The Tanakh: the Old Testament Books of Jesus' Time

[@braveheart3417]

WHAT A GIFTED TEACHER! Many thanks

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@AlexisGreig]

This is so great!! My new favorite way of reading the Bible in this order 🙏🏽 🤲🏼

[@GossomerPenguin]

I've recently started watching your videos, and I find myself becoming a Bible geek now...

[@RebornRymo]

I love these teachings so much, thank you! I learn so much and I got to say your artwork is amazing! Praise God!

[@henock6]

I don't know what to say!...Thanks to God for people like you. Stay Blessed

[@EthioAlema]

You can not believe how much i have learnt. Pls keep on posting your video its so helpful 🙏🏽😊

[@dannywearsthecrown567]

I’m hoping you continue to do more videos, you are the reason I’ve been able to make any progress with my scriptural studies. I study by myself as I can’t find anyone and you have truly been a huge blessing for me. Thank you

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@dannywearsthecrown567]

@@LetsGoUSA share with me why you feel that way. Maybe you can get me up to speed?

[@LetsGoUSA]

@@dannywearsthecrown567 The book was written by European converts who are not of the blood line of Israel. That's why when you read the Tanakh you can immediately tell that it has no God Israel inspiration. It is totally foreign from the Torah. Writen by people who are what the Bible cost the synagogue of Satan.

[@InformationEngineer59]

Thanks for the video. Could you also go into the books, please.. Do they have the same chapter and verse designations that the Old Testament has? If not, how is that aspect worked out? I think that knowing these details helps when communicating with Jews.

[@cynthialong4679]

Clear, concise and throrough. Just started watching, I'm on my 5th video. Thank you! I appreciate the historical context, info on authorship and overview as literature. Truly the greatest story ever told. Well done!

[@OverviewBible]

Many thanks, Cynthia! =)

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@jessajanuary1980]

Thank you for all of your videos. It's very helpful for me & others as well.

[@terencebolden5150]

Excellent!...either a teacher for a living, or just a natural. Thanks for putting these together, very understandable and easy to follow.

[@OverviewBible]

Thanks, Terence! Not a professional educator-but consulting demands some similar skills. =)

[@LetsGoUSA]

The books written by the Ashkenazi white fake Jews are straight evil TRASH!!!

[@themcs9664]

Jeffrey, if you own this channel..you put a smile on the Lord's heart since you made mine. Thank you and may the Lord pour His blessings upon you.

[@raes5407]

Your way of teaching has helped me so much. Thank you!

[@Walk_with_ELOHIM]

Super brother. very much informative. may THE ELOHIM bless you abundantly. Love and honour from Kerala, India.

[@andrayaskhan282]

Excellent teaching with illustrations, well done!

[@danielcharrie7125]

Ty, nice and simple, that put some order in my mind,GBY, and ty Jesus 🙏

[@johnnyg3]

Thank you for sharing I have enjoyed every video you made 🙏🏼✝️

[@OverviewBible]

That's so kind of you to say-thank you!

[@markcheshire4413]

I was just thinking about the jewish books the other day and this video came up. Well done.

[@kimberlypalmer947]

I'm so THANKFUL TO GOD, I've tried reading the BIBLE OVER AND OVER. I GET STUCK because of my comprehensive abilities and my brain wonders. I THANK GOD for you because I can finally finally follow along.. Thank YOU ALMIGHTY ❤

[@EM-vr8ip]

There are Bible versions that are very easy to understand. My favorite is the NLT but there’s many others, like the CEB, etc. They use modern English. I hope that helps.

[@frankiebluej6902]

I just discovered your channel today! I wish I had discovered it years ago. Thank you for the information. I am a visual learner and the blackboard helped me understand this faster than I normally would. I greatly appreciate the hard work (research is such HARD WORK!) you put into this video (and the other vids I'll be watching.)

[@normanfrancis2365]

👌 Super teacher! Thank you very much for your clear explanation on the Tanak.

[@TrudyConway]

Just discovering the website and YT channel. I will be sharing with friends interested in our faith. Also, I want to get the Beginner's book for myself and a niece. Thank you for the very clear information!

[@OverviewBible]

Thanks, Trudy-welcome to the jungle! =)

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@sheilaspaulding190]

Very good. One suggestion. Could we have a recap with just picture of whiteboard at the end so it can be put into my notes for further study.

[@antoleo97]

Thank you!!! ☺️🙏🏻

[@0animalproductworld558]

This is what gives me joy that God is for me, God is with me, God isn't against me, I am going to heaven, and I am not going to hell like many 🦬 God bless the animals 🍄

[@onelikeyouber1728]

Interesting and i will get back to watch in entirety.

[@behati9108]

When i was a muslim, we were prohibited to read or to even touch the bible coz its bad. But now since im no longer with the religion, i would love to know whats the content, the one thing that ive been wondering for so long. Then I found your channel, all your videos your presentations are very easy to understand as u put it in very simple manner, very enlighting and most of all filled up my curiosity. Your channel is a good starting point to learn about the bible. Cant thank u enough for all your harwork u put here. Cheers. Done subscribe and looking forward to hearing every future contents from this channel.

[@OverviewBible]

Thanks so much for the kind words! I'm hoping to release my overview of the book of Joshua this month--I can't wait to share it with you. =)

[@behati9108]

@@OverviewBible Wow.. i should better be hurry copying all the notes on your whiteboard so that i could catch up (Hope u dont mind!)😁 And can we have a video about Book of Enoch too? And the explanation why is it not included in the bible. Thank you sooooo much. Really cant thank u enough.

[@Raptiel]

@@behati9108 It's not forbidden in the Quran. Actually it says in the Quran that everything written in the Jewish scriptures is TRUE and they should keep having their sabbaths. I dont know what cult you was part of. But it is clearly not the muslim faith. I hope you are not deliberitely saying bad things about muslims or you just have not a clue. I think its the latter because it shows you never read the Quran. May God have mercy on your soul for saying things you clearly dont know

[@behati9108]

@@Raptiel regarding what i said 'they dont let me touch it', im referring to the old people in my small town, whose clearly ignorance. But i listen to them anyways since i was only kid. Now i know Quran, i understand the verses, i read translations, i read hadiths and i found the truth. Thats why im out. Maybe you dont understand whats in the Quran thats why u still with the cult.

[@ash9280]

@@Raptiel Quran doesn't prohbit but plenty of Muslim families do disgard Jewish/Christian bibles because according to them it has been ''corrupted.

[@rudyandfrancesartau8648]

Thank you for your insight and sharing it with us❣️

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@johnbeckett51]

Thanks very well explained.

[@vcp8908]

Very cool! Thank you very much.

[@mariakara4848]

can u pls talk about the written Torah and non writhing one，and thnx

[@HOLY.SPIRIT.LOURDES]

Wow! Excellent Job

[@hubertsimmons2283]

How can i get a version of this bible for my library ?

[@iankelly8666]

This is very well explained. I like the way you didn’t bring any nonsense tradition into it. Apart from your comments about the book of Daniel. Just because you don’t understand it doesn’t mean it’s bizarre. Just means you have to work harder!!

[@OverviewBible]

"Bizarre" isn't an assessment of how comprehendible something is. No matter how easy it is to map the "big little horn" of Daniel 8 to real-world figures, it doesn't make the image of a single-horned goat growing four horns (growing in each direction of the compass), with one horn growing it's own horn, which grows South, East, and Jerusalem-ward, then starts trampling the stars of heaven any less bizarre.

[@satomi3032]

We will have reporting today about the hebrew scripture and this is really helpful! Thank you so muchhh

[@LetsGoUSA]

This has nothing to do with Hebrew scripture this is made up European fallacies claiming to be word of God.

[@discipleG3101]

Awesome informative video!

[@luked.4812]

I’m learning about this in school

[@NathanMladenik]

you explained it perfectly

[@InjeeliMedia]

Great Job , God bless

[@andrericardosilva8753]

Peace be with you! Cool, thanks!

[@bibelstudiet7580]

Well done, thanks

[@sosassteelstrings9623]

QUESTION: I understand the explanation was great but, WHY did Christians decide to change the order and categorization over time? Doesn't it make more sense to read the O.T. the way the TanaKh displays it? (Its sill the same content but, different groupings)

[@OverviewBible]

Whoosh. Good question. These books have been grouped by "genre" for a while. The chronological order (putting Ruth between Judges and Samuel, and Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther directly after Kings likely makes it easier for modern non-Jewish readers to grasp the general timeline of the Old Testament. (It did for me, anyway!)

[@markiemisslane1188]

Where do I get this book

[@markiemisslane1188]

Where do I get the tnk afford able

[@ianactille3671]

Interesting narrative, however; what is the significance of the book of numbers?

[@swconnexion]

Thank you a lot ! it's enlightening

[@ljgood]

Jeffery, Hi... I hope to state this clear enough that you can understand. This video is awesome. Thank you. I am in the middle of a series that I am calling "This Gospel Of The Kingdom" One thing leads to another, right? I don't recall what exactly led me to you... but I am grateful. This is great stuff man. I would love to chat sometime.

[@OverviewBible]

I'm glad it's helpful! Thanks for the kind words. =)

[@ljgood]

@@OverviewBible I’ll try to remember to send you a link to the message! I stole your white board!!!!

[@LetsGoUSA]

THE TANAKH IS STRAIGHT EVIL TRASH!!!! WHAT A EVIL EUROPEAN SCAM... HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TORAH... IT'S FOOLISH AND EVIL... 😡🤬🤦🏻🤷🏻🤢🤮

[@gnieu1278]

This is exactly what I am looking for. The Lord God is Sovereign and He will exalt His Word above His Name.... Psalm 138

[@winfredbell7205]

Do you have a Statement of Beliefs listed anywhere?

[@OverviewBible]

Not yet, and if I were to write one it would be pretty loose, probably not building much beyond the Apostles' Creed and Nicene Creed. =)

[@alexisgreen-hernandez8604]

Great stories 👍

[@Wisebury]

They put together the Septuagint. Which is the old testament put together, Quoted by New Testament writers often

[@sandraross9355]

Thank you

[@laboratoriodellafede]

Hello. I don't want to be a know-it-all ... but to say that when the New Testament speaks of "Scriptures" it refers to the TaNaK does not seem correct to me. As far as I know, the "(holy) Scriptures" were "the Law and the Prophets", Torah and Nebyym. The books that make up the part that was later called Ketubym had not yet been "canonized". Greetings

[@Florida67]

Ok so finished Torah ...and. Joshua ...Im looking for help in Judges this one is hard to wrap my brain around..... Tanakh, I am struggling in after Joshua dies and how they are without a leader to finish clearing out the Canaan people...how this part goes seems rough...because the lands been divided but its a mess again....not clear understanding what was expected of them to know who they clear off of the neighboring ppl...????

[@LittleJoeTheMoonlightCat]

You didn't add the Apocrypha.

[@OverviewBible]

Correct: because the Deuterocanon wasn't in the Tanakh, and this video is about the Tanakh. ;-)

[@LittleJoeTheMoonlightCat]

@@OverviewBible Yeah Okay, Just a Little Something I Noticed, and I Read the KJV Mostly, So I'm just Now getting Familiar to the Style of The TANAKH, it was an informative video Thanks.

[@shuajackson615]

Fantastic!

[@Charles-tv6oi]

When Tanakh made ? Before or after what?

[@oglandonkoglk5530]

Elohim is first we are the people Religions are the 🧙‍♀️ Bnei Yisroel is 🇺🇸 🥷

[@stroolpete]

Very, very good.

[@gavinpeterson580]

@OverviewBible I have a question, you said that Cyrus the great built a temple for the people who worship God. So this was all about 500 years before Jesus' time? Does the Tanakh agree with modern scholars on the time period? I am currently reading Herodotus histories, so I am curious. Edit: thanks for the incredible resources btw

[@7349yt]

How do we know what the Jews of the first century meant by words and terms like "scriptures/writings", "word of God", "the law and the prophets"? What hard evidence do we have? And if we do have any, how widespread and authoritative would that have been? Did they really have the same kind of understanding about these terms that we do? Or even as, say, fourth century Jews and Christians did? I seriously doubt it. When and which "books" did they consider to be authoritative, inspired by God, God's revealed word, "inerrant", and/or "canonical"? The "Tanak" is a term that first appeared only a few hundred years ago, and didn't gain traction until recent times, mostly so that Jews wouldn't have to speak about "the Old Testament" (a Christian term) or even the Hebrew "BIBLE" (also a Christian term). As for the oldest known complete version of the Jewish scriptures, it is, ironically, not in Hebrew but in Greek: the Septuagint, which has "extra" books, which seem to have been dropped in the second century, at least partly because the early Christians considered them authoritative scripture. There is even evidence in the NT that these "deuterocanonical/apocryphal" books were known to the NT writers and were used like any other "scriptures".

[@romeovkuki]

I love this video

[@ningreingamkamei6323]

Hi Sir, I hear that Tanak and christian Old Testament are different. Jew guy said that Catholic Church fabricated the old Testament to match with the New Testament.Is that right?

[@MattDeVoreVisionsOfRapture]

The Tanakh (or Hebrew Bible) is the same content as the Old Testament in the Christian Bible - just in a different order and some books are combined. The exception is for Catholic Bibles which include the Apocryphal writings such as Tobit, 1 & 2 Maccabees, etc.

[@ninahuang7333]

@@MattDeVoreVisionsOfRapture Fact: The apochrypha books were a part of Jesus' day bible (OT). They used the Septuagint. All of his quoted parables come from it that are NOT in the Tankh, and definitely not the Masoretic texts which in fact were altered taking out references that once unanimously pointed to Jesus. Today they don't have chapters of Isaiah. They changed the word virgin, to young woman in the masoretic texts.... I love this guys KZbin videos but seeing he may believe that Jesus and his apostles didn't use the Septuagint is disappointing. He no less does the best job I have seen in regards to bible information.

[@kjstars]

Old Testament covers in the Christian Bible?

[@real_Gi]

Is it pronounced Tanach or Tanak? I mean, it has to be Tanak, because it is Ketuvim, not Che-tuvim right?

[@LAMarshall]

The "kh/ch" sound is a guttural throaty sound like in the German word "Bach". In Hebrew all letter Ks are pronounced like this when they don't begin a word. Hence, KeTuViM = Ketuvim, but TaNaK = TanaKH. There is no H letter used in the original Hebrew spelling, it's part of the transliteration to show the shift in pronunciation. This sound doesn't exist in English, so people pronounce it as a regular K. The CH sound in English "church" doesn't exist in Hebrew at all. You should never pronounce any "ch" in transliterated Hebrew like you would in English.

[@real_Gi]

@@LAMarshall What a great post. You obliterated my confusion. Thank you.

[@oglandonkoglk5530]

Elohim sent me

[@darianmarson9434]

Canonized?

[@VictorGonzalez-df8io]

Arius Calpurnius Piso - Who Wrote The New Testament

[@eliyyahu9968]

Why is Enoch not mentioned?

[@OverviewBible]

Enoch the character is mentioned in Genesis. A long time later, a few books arose that described visions Enoch had. While the author of Jude seems familiar with those works, and while Jesus maybe referenced them once (and that's a big "maybe"), they do not seem to have been historically considered part of the Torah, Prophets, or Writings.

[@tsifehnnduhkum7530]

In Jesus's own words I don't see were he limited the prophets, because he promise more prophets will arise that will do greater things, that includes the new testament and today, he even went as far to say fake prophet will also arise. help me understand better or referred me to your other teachings. thanks

[@tasfish1]

Before Jc bro. The protagonist in the old and new are two very different beings.

[@jp8871]

10:31 but jews don’t believe in Jesus.

[@jennapecor1865]

All Jews recognize Jesus existed, they just don’t believe he was the son of God. Which is exactly why he was crucified at the time. Many Jews at the time didn’t either, but many did. Jesus was Jewish and his apostles were Jewish. Paul was a Jew himself who converted. Hope that helps!

[@nothingbutthetruth613]

@@jennapecor1865 Actually jews don't believe in a lot more than just that he was the son of God. Many christians don't believe that either. They also don't all recognize that jesus existed. Jews actually have no idea if he existed or not. Nor do they care. He means absolutely nothing to them and if he did exist, it would be totally irrelevant since they don't believe he was anything more than a false messiah. He ends off the video saying how amazing it is that all the scriptures show how jesus fulfilled them. However, he never showed how jesus fulfilled anything. So not exactly sure what he's talking about.

[@jenex5608]

There are Jews who believe in Jesus

[@EM-vr8ip]

@@jenex5608 yes, there were a lot of Jews who believed in Jesus. They were the Apostles and the first church back then was composed of believers that were Jew converts and non Jews like the Greek and such. The “Twelve” were all Jews. So yes, Christianity’s roots are Jewish. And most importantly, Jesus was Jewish. But He challenged the way the Jews were practicing their “religion”.

[@Wuggins157]

Jesus is God no matter what any of us think I declare this in his presence and precious name in Jesus name amen

[@homosapien.a6364]

Ok i Decide to learn hebrew and i started with saving the torah So 1- barishit bra' elohem att ha shmayem ve att ha erets 2 - ve ha erets lub lub luah I forgot the rest of it 🙂👌

[@joseg.solano1891]

the hand-emoji is a 666.

[@pamelaleibowitz3019]

There is no Old Testament.. It is the Tanach. 24 Books.

[@MC-sn2so]

Around 70% of the scriptural quotes in the New Testament are from the Septuagint. Verifiable by comparing the passages to their equivalent in the Masoretic or Septuagint texts . The masoretic texts weren’t completed until around 800ad .

[@tonokreepersssr6083]

@OverviewBible Nahmsayin'

[@william1863]

The Lord our God your God the Almighty God and Father of the Saved bless you and keep you safe in Christ I pray 🙏💔✝️❤️‍🩹👍For he is the LORD of hosts our CHRIST God with us in Spirit but to return as the Son of Man. Selah 💖 SHALOM ✌️

[@sajjoexam8083]

I like you may our LORD YESHUA MESSIAH Grace with us

[@CD-123]

Who?

[@coloradofranksantiago1242]

💛💚💙❤🧡

[@anthonyevans4298]

Garbage. Jesus isn't in the Tanakh, but you stop every eighth of second to reference him. Huge disservice to Moses, Abraham, Issac, Jacob, etc. Wait until you find out Jesus is an idol, and who you've really been worshipping.

[@Cats3to2]

Hello Yah's son!

[@catwhisperer911]

Let me preface what I am about to say by stating up front that I am not a scholar. I have been a secular Jew all my life until I began studying the Tanakh. So here goes. There is nothing in the Tanakh that would support the prophecy of Jesus. Nothing! Christians distorted passages in the Tanakh when they wrote what they call the Old Testament. Why did Christians do that if Jesus was real. Jews will never understand that and Christians should be asking themselves the same question. We cannot accept Jesus as a human manifestation of GOD as GOD forbid human sacrifice and therefore Jesus could not have died for our sins. Also, "put no other beside me", that's the 1st of the commandments that GOD gave to Moses. Yet Christians pray to Jesus and not to GOD. I am sorry if this offends anyone but the truth must be told as GOD declared the people of the book to be his voice and there is only one true GOD and that is the GOD of Israel as written in the Tanakh and not an intentional misrepresentation like the Old Testament. If you really seek GOD then you must forgo all other books and read and study the Tanakh. GOD loves you all. You are all his children.

[@OverviewBible]

These claims would be a lot more compelling with evidence. For example: - Which Tanakh passages, specifically, were distorted by Christians? - What is this "prophecy of Jesus" you speak of? - When was the Old Testament written by Christians? (I'll accept that Christian printers arrange the books in ways that are different from the Tanakh-hence this video-but the claim that the Old Testament is a single Christian work needs evidence.) - "God declared the people of the book to be his voice" … corroborating evidence would be really helpful if you're going to make this claim. - "Christians pray to Jesus and not to God." First of all, this is simply false-especially given that even the New Testament favors prayer directed to YHWH. Second, equating divine allegiance to prayer is a rather grave reduction. - "If you really seek GOD then you must forgo all other books and read and study the Tanakh." This undercuts centuries of Israelite worship that predate the Tanakh, and it introduces the troublesome problem of God's ways being exclusively available to literate people. As Moses says, "the word is very near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart so you may obey it."

[@paularoberts866]

No

[@ktown4751]

This is why the Edomite Christians created Jesus.. 👀. (Obadiah 1:10) “For thy violence against thy brother Jacob shame shall cover thee, and thou shalt be CUT OFF for ever.” (Obadiah1:18)...and there shall NOT be ANY REMAINING of the house of Esau 👱🏻; for the LORD hath spoken it.” (Amos9:12) That they may POSSESS the REMNANT of EDOM, ...

[@208dany1]

Tornevket. The law of 3 for humans

[@bettylilyrodriguezhenrique8346]

Tanakh means Hebrew bible

[@salmanakram1523]

Its good to guide people and show them the right path but if people follow you then you have their responsibility on you. But how you ignore a book or a prophet whose message tell us everything which happened form Adam till Jessie. His name is Muhammad and the book is Quran. Why not you do your research on it so you have complete information to give to people. Jewish people not accept Jessie, but the truth is when Jessie come the prophecy of Muzis revoked and when prophet Muhammad comes the teaching of Jessie revoked and same thing is Christian doing and Muslims believe that Jessie will come in near future so first look whole picture don't leave a part of it. So my humble request to everyone please read Quran and message of Muhammad don't give excuse the day of judgement that God we haven't read Quran so i convey you the message to read by your self please.

[@jenex5608]

Genesis Exodus Leviticus Numbers Deutorenomy are the septuagint names

[@EM-vr8ip]

They’re called “The Law Books”, or “The Books of Moses”, or the “Pentateuch”.

[@BrandonDanilition]

This is just not true. The Jews didn’t have a universally accepted canon of scripture till the councils of Jamnia, which was well after the time of Jesus. Pretty much all Jews universally accepted the Torah. However, what was included in the Prophets was quite divided amongst differing Jewish sects and groups, and many included the book of Enoch and likewise texts. The canon you explore was more consistent in the councils of Jamnia, which was in response to the Christians who already had a council of specific books to be included in the Bible, under Pope Damasus, from Genesis to Revelation. This gave Christians a universally accepted canon of scripture. The councils of Jamnia also banned Christians from synagogue worship, so you’re trusting in an anti-Christian council that was set against those who believed Yeshua to be the Mashiach.

[@tonokreepersssr6083]

#ƧG

[@estherpurim66]

L'chaim

[@j.brandon7402]

Jews today still use the Tanakh and it's kind of cultural appropriation to use the same books in a slightly different order and come up with a new religion that had these scriptures as the basis and rename it the Old Testament. No, it already has a name. The Mormons didn't rename the bible, the Muslims didn't rename the New Testament or the Bible.... so why are you renaming our text. You should still call it the Tanakh.

[@OverviewBible]

Christian parties have enacted a lot of hate (and cultural appropriation) against the Jews through the ages, and that's wrong. You'll find plenty of examples of disrespect for Jewish tradition in the history of Christianity-but I don't think citing this as an example furthers your rhetorical goals. "You should still call it the Tanakh." Unfortunately, you may have made some historically inaccurate assumptions in reaching this conclusion. A few things to consider: 1) The term "Tanakh" wasn't its name when Christianity began. That term wasn't recorded until medieval times-it was called "Mikra"/"Miqra" beforehand. Tanakh isn't the original name, and it didn't become a common term for the Hebrew Bible until well after Christianity started. 2) The reordering of books happened before Christianity, too. The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek around the third and second centuries BCE. This translation was called the Septuagint, and the books were arranged differently from the Tanakh. Hundreds of years later, Greek-speaking Christians made heavy use of the Septuagint, and Christians have (roughly) used the Septuagint arrangement of books ever since. 3) There's no "renaming" effort at play here by Christians. In fact, you can trace the names Christians use in several languages for the books of the Tanakh back to the names that were used in the Septuagint (which, again, predates Christianity by more than a century). Hopefully this is helpful!

[@tonikume8364]

keep in mind that the bible and tanakh are the blacks hebrew book and not yours.

[@kanwalafzala3750]

We don't believe Tanakh is God's word as it's not written by prophets but written by men.

[@OverviewBible]

Exactly! No known extant document on earth can be correctly referred to (without caveat) as "God's word" because every known extant document on earth was written by humans. You get it!

[@auntygrace4715]

Thank you