Support me on Subscribestar www.subscribestar.com/millennium-7-history-technology Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7
@aviationaerospacechannel59873 жыл бұрын
Weirdly enough, many programs are getting the same architecture of 3 drones or UAV/UCAV configuration. It reminds me directly of the FCAS program, which is the other European 6th gen fighter project lead by Dassault with its partners AirBus, Thales, MBDA, Indra, SNECMA, SAFRAN, etc ... The FCAS is ambitious too, but in a more realistic way.
@112deeps3 жыл бұрын
India's HAL has already produced the unmanned wingman version for AeroIndia 2021.. Tell us about these
@Ms13unknown133 жыл бұрын
what can you say about the Mig-41?
@kaushik377 Жыл бұрын
Could u make a video on India's AMCA
@DilpreetSingh-19893 жыл бұрын
First Tornado, then Typhoon, now Tempest... What's next... Turbulence ?
@mrrolandlawrence3 жыл бұрын
fury, hawk and then hunter
@gospodinkenobi99033 жыл бұрын
Spitfire 😃
@RandomSwede-13 жыл бұрын
@@gospodinkenobi9903 That name is too glorious to be used again
@darveshzamindar3 жыл бұрын
Mosquito
@wkelly30533 жыл бұрын
Hurricane
@Elysian_Angel_3 жыл бұрын
Sounds like you had a lot of fun making this video! 😂🥳
@MM-wt2oo3 жыл бұрын
Tempest can actually be an amazing platform. UK has the engine technology … most difficult to develop and Sweden has experience developing a really well balanced, relatively cheap and multi role fighter.
@grantmccall.3 жыл бұрын
Skylon engines are probably hypersonic. Wouldn't hypersonic with vectored thrust be better?
@djl56342 жыл бұрын
@@grantmccall. no as hypersonic missiles will melt themselves. And they are wayy more aerodynamic
@roryforham2 жыл бұрын
gripen is hardly cheap $85 mil per unit
@_cyantist Жыл бұрын
@@roryforham the whole point of gripen is that it is cheap
@sdfopsdmsdofjmp78638 ай бұрын
@@_cyantist cheap to operate. Not necessarily cheap to buy.
@callenclarke3712 жыл бұрын
Military Technology videos are typically a bit grim and humorless. This is really fun! It's not just anyone that can add humor into these topics. It has to be done the right way. Well done. Count me a fan!
@FS-wd3hu3 жыл бұрын
the new thing will be everytime anybody amkes a new jet it will always be 1 gen. higher than the previous
@Joetechlincolns3 жыл бұрын
Or they can take a play from Samsung and Apple's rule book and just skip ten models at a time. Next stop, 16th generation. That'll get the bids rolling in.😂
@FS-wd3hu3 жыл бұрын
@@Joetechlincolns the amount og fanboys they Will create Will be unmatched! Unless...
@ericktreetops7413 жыл бұрын
It's just one budget cut away of being shelved or drastically reduced in scope.
@energiam8803 жыл бұрын
Especially after post-Covid Britain. Have you seen how much the GDP shrank? Expect a decade of extreme austerity, collapsing industries, and joblessness. BAE Systems and Rolls Royce are fragile at the best of times, with massive job losses. And we're far from the best of times
@Renegade-Master-883 жыл бұрын
Allot of jobs depending on this program, actually UK increased R & D spending. Sweden knows it needs to keep its home grown planes going too.
@sergarlantyrell78473 жыл бұрын
@@Renegade-Master-88 Yes... Expect to see a lot of infrastructure projects too as the Government tries to inject money into the economy. Also, that's after the double-whammy of Brexit and Covid.
@firefly84643 жыл бұрын
TSR 2 all over again I bet... as a Brit I hope not... but I won’t hold my breath 😢🇬🇧
@GonzoTehGreat3 жыл бұрын
@@energiam880 More austerity policies are unlikely in the current political climate, given their failure to turn the economy around over the last decade, Also, Covid-19 has actually made government intervention via fiscal stimulus more, not less, likely. In particular, commercial aviation has been badly affected by the pandemic and it will take several years for demand for flights to return. This has in turn resulted in a lack of demand for commercial engines, resulting in layoffs, including at Rolls Royce, who need "Team Tempest" to kick start their recovery.
@andrewpoole1602 жыл бұрын
Your video are always thoughtful, informative and fun because of your sense of humor. Thanks a million. God Bless
@muchadoaboutnothing61963 жыл бұрын
Quick video idea; it’d be cool if you did a video on all the changes that happened from the X35 to the production F35.
@aviationaerospacechannel59873 жыл бұрын
Hahaha the science fiction chapter was even a bigger laughing time ! Millennium 7* you're definitely the best humorist in military technologies ! Seriously, I didn't believed all these science fiction things too, when I first saw it months ago. 👍😉
@Ezekiel9032 жыл бұрын
i love "Effectors", instead of bombs today we say Effectors 🤔 this political correctness shit, only because today's public want hear deadly, they have to invent new names, so funny😄 like smart bombs, sounds as it would kill only people with bad intention, but it will kill everybody, depends only of the order, this bombs detonate no matter if it are civilian or not
@petersellers92193 жыл бұрын
I love the 'effectors' which sound so much nicer than old fashioned 'weapons'.
@Veldtian13 жыл бұрын
Orwellian libtardery at it's peak.
@petersellers92193 жыл бұрын
@@Veldtian1 I agree. God save us, those weapons might have even HURT someone.
@chrisrautmann89363 жыл бұрын
@@Veldtian1 How many libtards do you think are designing weapons for the military? Honestly.
@hardcard2543 жыл бұрын
@@Veldtian1 Sure, the ones building war machines and weapons are liberals...
@sparty943 жыл бұрын
i hope they are successful with this project, sounds like a hell of a plane.
@vensb88622 жыл бұрын
I really enjoyed the video especially your amazing sense of humor...wish you the best :) and looking forward to more...
@mwtrolle3 жыл бұрын
14:31 possibly it's more effective without a pilot in some situations, as it then can exceed the maximum G-force a human can survive.
@w8stral3 жыл бұрын
All "future aircraft" from every country = Buzzword BINGO Baloney Yea yea, they will be the best at everything, over perform expectations, come in under budget, be produced sooner than expected, and cost next to nothing for maintenance...
@munmunhazarika52473 жыл бұрын
Tejas is the best aircraft.... Thank you PM modi
@arkadeepkundu47293 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile the Chinese: BAE systems, RR, Leonardo, MBDA, Saab, GKN... So that's the list of companies we need to hack for our next research project?
@munmunhazarika52473 жыл бұрын
@@arkadeepkundu4729 chanakya neeti
@LRRPFco523 жыл бұрын
@@arkadeepkundu4729 They already had a senior engineer in Rolls Royce stealing everything he could gain access to. Same thing with Pratt & Whitney and GE. China is struggling to build a modern fighter engine that will last more than a few hundred hours. They can imitate, but not replicate.
@hopper1313 жыл бұрын
@@munmunhazarika5247 LMAO, wrong. Firstly, your country picked Raffale instead of Grippen E, which is a more expensive yet less effective weapon system. Secondly, a Grippen E would eat a Tejas 1 or 2 for breakfast due to its system integration, super-maneuverability, thrust to weight ratio, and armament. Edit: Oh and don't forget the fact that Grippen E has a world-class EW system. Tejas at present, does not. Tejas was a homemade interim choice that doesn't even meet IAF requirements.
@MChronicleSword3 жыл бұрын
This looks like a stealthy eurofighter, just like how the F22 looks like a stealthy F15
@arkadeepkundu47293 жыл бұрын
4:01 "Basically, this is the best you can have in Europe if you exclude the French" Frenchies, sitting on Rafales: _Hon! Hon! Hon! Nobody excludes the French, the French exclude you!_
@uegvdczuVF2 жыл бұрын
France is cooperating with Germany and Spain on making FCAS. The original FCAS, the one before the Brits changed the name of their program from Tempest in to - also FCAS. Dassault, Airbus, Indra, Safran, Thales, MBDA -basicaly the best in Europe excluding the UK. Given this is developed for the three larges EU nations - Germany, France and Spain i'm not sure to whom will post Brexit UK be selling its fighter.
@loyalist57362 жыл бұрын
@@uegvdczuVF Well there are 3 countries who will have it before they pitch it to anyone else .
@VisibilityFoggy2 жыл бұрын
@@uegvdczuVF The issue is that Germany spends next to nothing on its military, and Spain will buy a token fleet to complement its F-35Bs. France will be the primary end user and will dictate development, which (like the Eurofighter project) will cause division and infighting given the usual arrogance of the French when it comes to... everything. The Tempest project is on much steadier ground, and there is talk that Japan could be joining the team.
@tomschmidt381 Жыл бұрын
As an American I'm glad to see the Europeans working on this. As you have posted there is a risk if everyone is using the same aircraft. It makes the adversary's role easier and worst if a weakness is discovered it becomes vulnerable.
@siddallj3 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait to see what they create with this aircraft sounds amazing 🤩
@cannonfodder43763 жыл бұрын
Honestly the magnets on the compressor blade tips were the most eyebrow raising thing to me. Quite clever thinking on creating electrical power though. Although I am dubious as to the virtual cockpit, VR tech has come a long way but we are not there yet IMO. Good and informative as always, although the music again seemed a tad loud during your narration and explanations. Better than the last one though.
@aviationaerospacechannel59873 жыл бұрын
This story of magnets or any other complex things like that, it's just good to make the aircraft not reliable at all. This tempest will be a new f35 full of problems.
@draleigh88813 жыл бұрын
its not going to be ready till at least 2035 so basically in 20 years we'll see a fully functional tempest. in 20 years the VR is going to be insane. remember, AI is only around the corner. once AI is functional these problems will be solved very fast.
@tandemcharge51143 жыл бұрын
The VR tech has been there for a couple of years now. It's just that it's absurdly expensive to integrate and most military infrastructure just can't support it
@Alorand2 жыл бұрын
16:00 I can't hear "Effectors" without thinking about Iain M. Banks' Culture series.
@pareshprajapati79162 жыл бұрын
You enjoyed making this video more than we enjoyed. Thank you 🕉️🇮🇳🙏
@michaeldenesyk31953 жыл бұрын
As usual, you are excellent!
@Falkenlp33 жыл бұрын
The looks of the Tempest Reminds me of the Gloster Javelin a bit
@taylorc25423 жыл бұрын
It looks like Boeings F-35 competitor before it went with a 4 post tail.
@Veldtian13 жыл бұрын
@@michaelkeller5008 That thing looked so sweet, it was like a manga cartoon construction, no f**ks given.
@P90F553 жыл бұрын
That's awesome. Now let's all watch in astonishment as it falls behind schedule and goes over budget.
@487060993 жыл бұрын
It is always interesting and fun to watch your stuff. Thank you!
@deftones87172 жыл бұрын
Dude, you are so knowledgeable.. why are you not getting paid to design aircraft? Or do you work in aviation? Your knowledge is really impressive. You also seem like a great guy. Love the content!
@dsdy12053 жыл бұрын
13:23 It's possible they're referring to using the bleed air used to cool the turbines as a heat sink. It's the only thing in that region that will probably be cooler than the electronic boxes, unless they're planning on wasting even more power on a heat pump or something.
@mSparks433 жыл бұрын
supercruise with cold running engines.... that'll be a game changer
@DireW0lf03 жыл бұрын
I still think the Japanese should work with Northrop to build an updated F23 Black Widow!
@caseyalexander17053 жыл бұрын
Yeah.... it’s “coming”. At least 10 years before its first flight, another 3 to 5 before its live. Not to mention the political opponents it’ll face to try and stop its development. At least these videos keep the comments coming though.
@LRRPFco523 жыл бұрын
The money is really going to be risky to commit to the concept. I can see multiple parliaments not funding it at the rate that it needs to build momentum. That's also assuming the contractors can actually meet any of these requirements.
@sliperysid3 жыл бұрын
History does not bode well for this aeroplane's future.
@saucemaster94833 жыл бұрын
BEST CHANNEL OF KZbin PURE GOOLLLLDDD
@Ni9993 жыл бұрын
Outstanding job on this one!
@boejiden70933 жыл бұрын
India is working alongside Rolls Royce to develop the engine for the Tempest. They want to use the engine for their 6th gen fighter, the AMCA mk2
@sanjuktanaik24443 жыл бұрын
Bro it's 5.5/5+ AMCA
@davidsuzukiispolpot3 жыл бұрын
Damn you! I need to go to sleep, but I can't stop binge watching your videos they are so good!!
@oxcart41723 жыл бұрын
U lacked FCUS at the beginning! 😂😂😂
@scottyfox63763 жыл бұрын
Kinda sounds like you're FCUSing around some. 😇
@sheltr97353 жыл бұрын
Thought-provoking...as usual Entertaining...as usual Boy! That Rolls Royce video sure went all-in on the Bond-esque theme music, didn't it? It is great, no question. Smashing, even. High production values. You can just see James acknowledging all they're doing, with a simple tip of his martini glass in their direction...
@rikulappi96643 жыл бұрын
Voice commands? Still cannot imagine the pilot speaking to his aircraft while pulling 4-6 Gs... Or having a conversation with the AI while trying to outpace and outsmart enemy fighters, in order to complete the primary mission.
@jeanvaljean92933 жыл бұрын
It's already a reality on the rafale for exemple. And I confirm NO pilot ever use it when pulling Gs.
@brianarnold32503 жыл бұрын
Very informative. Nice to hear a knowledgeable report.
@janvesely63533 жыл бұрын
Augmented/virtual reality will definitely help a lot with integration of the ever growing complex information. I used to fly small aircrafts, so I wondered about analog instruments disappearing from the modern cockpits even in a backup role. They are basically gone, Russians kept some, but generally it's all digital electronics and LCD, OLED or whatever flat, buttons and knobs are replaced with touch screens. And they seem to get bigger with less redundancy. HUDs still relevant, but no longer mandatory, while VR/AR helmets are on raise. I personally think there are 2 main practical reasons aside of benefits in information processing: 1) increased reliability - modern displays and electronics became more reliable than analog/mechanical instruments and they handle high stresses, vibrations etc. better than sensitive mechanical devices, so if there is any backup, it's also electronic. 2) whole fly-by-wire, increasing role of the computers in flight - just imho, if the situation in the futuristic jet fighter would get so bad that a pilot relied on a set of analog/mechanical backups, which would otherwise be considered a generous instrument set in a small simple aircraft on VFR.. I'd eject immediately :D Btw I think they actually keep HOTAS in Tempest as the last stand of traditional physical controls, while the rest seems very minimalistic, indeed waiting for the next generation of pilots.
@lqr8243 жыл бұрын
14:35 hi-G turns would benefit from being pilotless of course. Main minus would be identifying targets for sure, and jamming.
@comediangj49553 жыл бұрын
Not out turning a vector thrust missile no matter how hard you pull. In any other situation pulling high-g/high-AOA will just make you loose speed and be a sitting duck.
@curtiscarpenter98812 жыл бұрын
You think of the number of patents filed per plane and then the sale of the intellectual property the world over Japan, Israel, Australia and Qatar would pay a arms and a leg to mess existing systems with newer ones. Any company within reason can with profit maximisation grow competitively with a market leading product.
@varunkoganti90673 жыл бұрын
That disco reveal of a mock-up. That's how airbus is spreading their money.
@MonMalthias3 жыл бұрын
The gamers have taken over the military industrial complex with their RGB.
@jakedee41173 жыл бұрын
All very cool. By the way, the science fiction writer Iain M Banks used the term "Effectors" to describe the super high tech electromagnetic weapons in his "Culture" series of books.
@daviddavis6023 жыл бұрын
Love this video 👍🏾😎
@avatar2thewayofwater33 жыл бұрын
Design of Tempest😍,especially the nozzle design🤘.
@PotatoeJoe692 жыл бұрын
5th gen fighters are brand new, the majority of countries don't have 5th gen fighters yet, and the technology is classified. 6th gen fighters are 30 years away at least.
@chrissartain44302 жыл бұрын
#1 of my 2 best youtube creators.
@coltsinglearmy2 жыл бұрын
Your videos are always funny and informative!
@markwoods45743 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget it’s not just the UK its Sweden , Italy and Japan is also involved in some part.
@Siiello3 жыл бұрын
It did not appear to me that the engine is used as a heat sink, it appeared that a heat sink basket it put around the engine to cool the engine. The other end of the heat sink system with the cylinders appeared to be a mechanism for converting the heat into power of some from thereby consuming the heat.
@billhanna21483 жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏 AGAIN for an excellent succinct informative and flawless video 👍🙏💪...I can't find this information anywhere in national media
@phoenyx67163 жыл бұрын
Thank you for exposure ❤️
@ericferguson99893 жыл бұрын
Nintendo switch controls sounds like it could be a problem if the pilot scratches his nose in flight.
@richardbradley85353 жыл бұрын
I love the Terminator music on the RR video
@kalle55482 жыл бұрын
Considering all the beautiful yet very effective jets SAAB have built, I really hope the final product isn't that bulbous looking thing with a huge price tag and it needing to scrap BAS90
@jcgongavoe3373 жыл бұрын
I recommend you to talk about concept planes in games such as ace combat, especially pros and cons
@SalihGoncu3 жыл бұрын
Using the turbine for heatsink is genius. - the bypass air is cooling the exhaust as it's adding to the thrust and if you heat it 2-3 degrees before mixing with exhaust won't effect the heat signature but you will have a constant efficient heat dispersion for the onboard avionics that produce a lot of heat.
@MrM970 Жыл бұрын
Really easy to listen to👍
@markwoods4574 Жыл бұрын
Don’t forget Rolls Royce invented the concept of Super sonic air speed eg concord, lets not forget that the Japanese have now joined the Tempest program .
@markwoods45742 жыл бұрын
I do hope there’ll be making a naval version of the Tempest the two British Aircraft Carriers would suit this new 6th generation fighter jet’s .
@svartmetall3 жыл бұрын
'Effectors' ....someone's been reading their Iain M. Banks :D
@notsoserious09443 жыл бұрын
Aircraft, like automobiles are becoming increasingly more expensive to design, build, and operate. The slavish devotion to stealth is also making them of decreasing utility as their stealthy payload shrinks. It remains to be seen if, say an F35 sortie would prevail over a reasonably equipped, numerically superior enemy willing to absorb the limited damage the F35 can inflict. Compound that with unmanned (stealthy or not) essentially throw away air to air drones and I don't know if there will be a gen 6.
@Asghaad3 жыл бұрын
problem is, that no airforce today can "absorb the limited damage" as you call it ... you cant just do URRAAA charge in the air because the F35s would just destroy most of your non-stealth attack force from relatively safe distance then just pull back to rearm under cover of second wave of non-stealth / ground based AAA only to do the same thing in few hours. Stealth is HUGE advantage in air to air combat making defeating radar guided ordnance frankly trivial, just making a viable lock on any stealth platform is difficult enough, now imagine what employing basic defensive maneuvers does to the missile that can hardly lock on to the target in the first place.
@notsoserious09443 жыл бұрын
@@Asghaad The F35 can't lose the BVR fight because it can't carry an internal AIM9. It also has to turn and run on time if things don't go its way because it is slow. If it is facing a flight of SU27s with a dozen R77-whatevers on each aircraft, things had better go perfectly or the F35 with four missiles is in trouble. The F35 does appear to be doing a great job as an F117-type attack aircraft for Israel. If it can easily defeat anything, nearly effortlessly, as you believe, I think that would be great. But I doubt it.
@Asghaad3 жыл бұрын
@@notsoserious0944 dozens of missiles that cant ever lock onto the target might as well be a ballast weight ... purpose of stealth is to NOT to get into VVR... secondly the F35s will be shadowed and covered by F22s ... same advantages as F35, much higher performance and will absolutely roflstomp any 4th gen fighter (remember when you see F22 lose in training excercises they mount special equipment to nullify the stealth and are usually put in unfavorable position the jet will never be in real combat. Now imagine what will happen when British F35s start flinging Meteors instead of AMRAAMS xD
@notsoserious09443 жыл бұрын
@@Asghaad You do know that the F35 will have to defend a missile heading its way? IOW, if a threat is coming your way, locked on or no, the pilot will go defensive. You also seem to think we have a lot more F22s than we actually have. You do know that our Air Force is actively buying more "legacy" airframes? Why?
@Asghaad3 жыл бұрын
@@notsoserious0944 except there wont be missile going its way because F35s will be firing at distances opposition cannot get viable targetting solution... if they fire blind all they will be doing is wasting the missiles because active radar missile being fired without viable lock against targets that you dont even know from which direction they are coming from (you do know that ONE F35 can guide other planes in the vicinity which can be aproaching the enemy from completely different direction right ? ...) has about ZERO chance of successfully acquiring a lock afterwards ... it would be like throwing darts at target 50 meters away BLINDFOLDED and hoping to score perfect bullseye ... as for F22s there are about 180-ish in service (to be precise 187 operational craft + 8 testbeds with 5 crashes meaning there are still at least 182 production Raptors in service not counting the test planes) with and Airforce is buying more "legacy" airframes because F22s are expensive to operate and unnecessary at the moment as the enemies US is facing kinda lack any proper airforces ... which is why they are investing in legacy airframes that are more than enough to deal with anything they are expected to face ... also there is that little thing of F22 having no equal in the air even more than 20 years after it was put into service... there isnt a nation n this planet that put sufficient enough number of comparable fighters into service to warrant any worry as currently those are barely out of prototype stage and not expected to be put into service in any relevant numbers for years to come as they are simply too expensive to produce and maintain.
@OXYOXYOXY4443 жыл бұрын
love your work ,keep it up
@vickydroid3 жыл бұрын
Missed the Typhoon, Tempest name connection but love this speculation. You're right to doubt the wisdom of novel controls (like haptic gloves being necessary). I'm excited by what'll come out of the wash in the end, all the players are very experienced in advanced aircraft development, so it'll be a great team to follow. lLANCA surely had you going but it was "effectors" that had me chuckling. The enemy was "effected" out of his flight plan....
@DavidLee-df8883 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised to hear you say that looking back on your posts. I made the connection way back when I heard that the Brits were going to call their version of the Eurofighter the Typhoon. Although back then, I was/am a big fan of the Harrier, mostly because I had a gap year tour of the RR plant in Filton where they were making the Pegasus engines. I still wish I went to work there.
@vickydroid3 жыл бұрын
@@DavidLee-df888 yeah, I kinda missed it for years after seeing the EFA testbed flying, then for more years seeing the Eurofighter monicker, it didn't register deeply , funny as we had Lightning and Tornado fighters (although MRCA still sticks in my head from pre-ADV variants) if we're going that way then can't wait for Whirlwind (Westland) and Hurricane (Hawker) to make their way back into RAF inventory. Although Whirlwind was a chopper for me as a child.....Son still tells me off for using Soviet in the present sense🤪
@andrewlambert72463 жыл бұрын
The equasion is simple. The more the aircraft become complex the more expensive they will become which means fewer aircraft which means easier to take them out on the ground. Longrange missiles and cruise missiles have CEP of a few meters and perfect to carry out pre-emptive strikes. Anyone today that has anything bad to say about Israel pre-emptive during six day war.
@heyidiot2 жыл бұрын
14:05 _"Nobody is thinking that the plane is more effective without the pilot."_ Unless industry consultants have gotten _at all_ smarter since I worked with them back in the day, I would _guarantee_ that someone IS thinking that _exact_ thing. 15:59 Case in point? The dude who thought up that _Effectors_ *B.S.* I can also guarantee that someone will be saying that this aircraft HAS NOT been "designed"... It has been _"architected."_
@mikmak31543 жыл бұрын
You should design a "Gastric Band" !
@Bigdangleebles3 жыл бұрын
I just pissed myself 🤣🤣🤣
@yosup1252 жыл бұрын
do what music was used for the rolls Royce jet video?
@joseluismatabuenasedano68812 жыл бұрын
13:23 I don't know if they're planing to actually use the turbine or the gas turbine (the whole engine) as a heat sink, if it is the second option it is possible to use the bypass (small amount of air moved by the fan (first compressor) but not going into the core (so, not going through the combustion chamber and turbines)). You can put some heat exchangers in this bypass and heat up the flow (just as the combustion chamber does but without spending any fuel $$$) and get some extra thrust. I think the spitfire had a similar concept, but this time they're taking advantage of the compressor and a higher heat input.
@30jugalvbiju743 жыл бұрын
India may join the TEMPEST program
@123Andersonev2 жыл бұрын
why do you need vectoring or a heat sink when you are using FLAVIIR?, also they won't be removing the stick, the point of it obviously is the software vs hardware upgradability, if it's not function critical, removing it removes the main maintenance cost overheads and facilitates upgradability with software version updates vs physical hardware, also the final version of the lanca will hopefully be able to finally get the name designation "spitfire" as hypothetically an air superiority AI driven drone in a swarm formation that can pull more g's than a human laden aircraft effectively smokes any exclusively human piloted counterpart.
@theczechfamous3 жыл бұрын
at 13 mins when you are talking about heat - RR have/had some connection to reaction engines and even owned the patent to the engines for HOTOL. Engines which use amazing heat exchangers - I guess this is the technology they are going to use to reduce the heat signature.
@Millennium7HistoryTech3 жыл бұрын
Interesting, any pointer?
@mikewade7773 жыл бұрын
Darpa imagined an F35 with a precooler so it's possible that is the route.
@nk56022 жыл бұрын
Doesn't intense heat of the compressor destroy the magnets?
@Aufenthalt3 жыл бұрын
Completely agree about the ridiculousness of making all touchscreens. Try to drive a car and set the navigator by touchscreens....removed the touch feeling you have to use your eyes for everything, a nightmare when you have to watch the street constantly.
@marklowden50543 жыл бұрын
You need to write a book
@alexandertheissl55173 жыл бұрын
I don't like the name Tempest... They should it call the 6 th generation Fighter . " Harpyie "
@slmyatt3 жыл бұрын
I heard a rumor of the return of a version of wing warping, with ability of the skin of of wings/body to warp, change shape.
@lqr8243 жыл бұрын
I was hoping to hear more about the directed energy weapons. In plain English, the turbine/generators put out huge power to what seem to be currently empty bays that at some point will contain something that can peel the enamel off your enemy's teeth, I suppose.
@prokremelskidezolati14263 жыл бұрын
Nice mock-up. What is that, wood? :)))
@terifarley47703 жыл бұрын
Thought he was Russian all this time.
@sergarlantyrell78473 жыл бұрын
Where is he from then?
@Dwight5112 жыл бұрын
When's the modern Spitfire? :P
@johnpatrick15883 жыл бұрын
Last I have read is the UK only designated 2 billion for R&D over 10 years which in military aviation is pocket money.
@positroll78703 жыл бұрын
As suspected, there will be money problems ... Janes reports: UK cuts GBP370 million from Tempest programme The UK government's Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA) has revealed in its annual report published on 15 July a GBP370 million (USD510 million) cut in the budget to build the Tempest Future Combat Air System. In its first public assessment of the programme to build a replacement for the UK Royal Air Force's (RAF's) Typhoon combat aircraft, the IPA gave the project an amber/red risk rating, saying there are “major risks or issues apparent in a number of key areas”. For the first time, the scale of UK Ministry of Defence (MoD) funding for Tempest was revealed to be GBP9.46 billion. Looking forward to a joining of the two (Tempest / FCAS), hopefully with a family of aircraft produced.
@junkieshere3 жыл бұрын
Dunno if its been mentioned or not. CFA-44 Nosferatu here we come.
@NoName-ds5uq3 жыл бұрын
Do you think “Adapable Physical Architecture” will effect the basic airframe’s weight in order to make it more flexible?
@d.cypher29203 жыл бұрын
Your channel is great. Your comments on previous video, saying most viewers appear to be more interested in *quality* over quantity, is true here. Ty, be well. 😎🇺🇸
@tommothedog3 жыл бұрын
Really enjoyed it
@paulbrooks43953 жыл бұрын
AR makes sense, but not VR. The optical fidelity is very low compared to the eyeball and a failed display would cost the pilot his vision, unlike an AR lenses. Also, why would the plane need displays if it’s using VR?
@noob_cabbageleaf92043 жыл бұрын
AMCA plz 🙏🏻
@robsmith95962 жыл бұрын
Why is there no vertical thrust vectoring like the F-22 at least, when it should have 360 degree thrust vectoring like the SU-57?
@andrejmucic50033 жыл бұрын
my father said to me when I was young: "Andrej! Never buy English car!" He was an engineer. I think same applies here.
@x2515-u2k3 жыл бұрын
must be an ethics thing
@kenfelix87033 жыл бұрын
No Rose Royce for you then!
@x2515-u2k3 жыл бұрын
@@kenfelix8703 wat
@kenfelix87033 жыл бұрын
Where do you think Rose Royce cars are made?
@x2515-u2k3 жыл бұрын
@@kenfelix8703 do you means rolls Royce?
@patrickchase56147 ай бұрын
Could RR's claim of a "distortion-tolerant fan system" be related to the lack of either DSI or conventional diverter? Are they betting that their engine will be so good at dealing with flow distortion that they don't need either? Another possibility is that they're considering a "suck-in" system as planned for the F-23 (though not present on the YF-23 demonstrator).
@calinsa38803 жыл бұрын
wil we get a video on the FCAS program? (they would have been better off calling it " the European FACS" XD )
@uegvdczuVF2 жыл бұрын
There is *the* European FCAS and it's not this. It's a joined program of Germany, France and Spain.
@solobackpacking2 жыл бұрын
By the time the Tempest goes into production the electronics will already be badly outed. Just how much testing is required for fighter jets?
@mikewade7772 жыл бұрын
How can it be outdated if the technology doesn't exist yet. That is like saying that the F-35 technology is outdated. Yet very little is known about it and there's no evidence that it's outdated
@Renegade-Master-883 жыл бұрын
Looks like a great team of contributors
@miltonturney4533 жыл бұрын
Nice design
@Akelehimarenge3 жыл бұрын
Wow lithium Ion or other kind of solid state 🔋 to store energy similar to MGU - H and MGU - K in F1.
@shaider19823 жыл бұрын
Also a recent Japanese submarine
@suokkos3 жыл бұрын
They also plan to adapt F1 technology to remove turbo lag.
@ravener963 жыл бұрын
Remove turbo lag? Do you mean engine spool time? I find that very hard to believe.