The ULTIMATE Sony APS-C Upgrade (Amazing Value!) Sigma 18-50 f/2.8

  Рет қаралды 4,174

Joseph Valenti

Joseph Valenti

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 13
@20111111jorg
@20111111jorg 7 ай бұрын
Thanks for that, just the comparison I was looking for. Well.... I looked at these on my 25" Dell photo monitor and could hardly tell the difference. If I had no 18-50 lens, I'd buy the Sigma. But since I have the kit lens, I think I'll just stop down a bit to f5.6 plus or put it on a tripod if I really need a good photo. Otherwise I'll enjoy the small cheaper and wider lens knowing it will be good enough for all but largest of prints, and then only to a pixel peeper most likely.
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 7 ай бұрын
Exactly! There is a slight side note to that is how important bokeh is to you, if you need it for what ever creative reason, I do really like the bokeh on the Sigma; but the kit is a beast still in my opinion
@america.onwheels
@america.onwheels 3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review. That's exactly what I was looking for. I have a question please, wich lense you did when explaining in the table ? I am looking for this angle. Not sure If I can have with the sigma 18-50. Thank brother!
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 2 ай бұрын
The lens in the table is a different one, but that field of view should be achievable with the 18-50mm.
@simonjenner5173
@simonjenner5173 9 ай бұрын
Thanks for the review 👍 been thinking about upgrading to this, how are you finding shooting at the longer focal lengths without stabilisation?
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 9 ай бұрын
It’s really not too bad for photography! The more you photograph the easier it gets. Especially during the day when you can shoot at higher exposure rates
@pablographix
@pablographix 19 күн бұрын
Well, neither one of those two lenses is really good for a6000... The kit lens has OSS but is sharp just in center. Taking shots at f3.5 sides and corners are absolutelly poor quality, at f5.6 is getting a bit better... Sigma is much sharper and brighter (f2.8) but lacks OSS so not the best lens to shoot under conditions other than sunny day outside... Maybe if someone takes photos with tripod only... Kind regards!
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 6 күн бұрын
I feel as if, as time went on - oss (for me at least) is less and less needed unless I am shooting like 200mm+
@mehenry06
@mehenry06 9 ай бұрын
I got the finger in the first 30s this video. I am however liking this sigma lens.
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 9 ай бұрын
Whaaaa
@mehenry06
@mehenry06 9 ай бұрын
​@@JosephValenti*:34s
@CocoKoi321
@CocoKoi321 9 ай бұрын
tamron 17 70, it has VC, i wont buy it.. im getting the 18 to 300 cause i wanna see what my fav focal lengths are and need bird shots, and it has VXD and vc isntead rxd
@JosephValenti
@JosephValenti 9 ай бұрын
That sounds like a solid plan to figure out your favorite focal lengths and capture those perfect bird shots!
Who Is The King Of APS-C Value - Tamron 17-70 or Sigma 18-50
10:29
Mark Bennett's Camera Crisis
Рет қаралды 102 М.
“Don’t stop the chances.”
00:44
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 62 МЛН
STOP using the wrong APERTURE.
18:46
Mads Peter Iversen
Рет қаралды 395 М.
Sigma 18-50 vs Sony 16-55 vs Tamron 17-70 Lens Comparison
11:56
SONY A7RV - Thoughts after a YEAR as an AMATEUR (with photos)
19:42
Jordan Spowart
Рет қаралды 5 М.
The World wasn't ready for these Crazy Lenses
12:18
Cong Thanh
Рет қаралды 295 М.
Sigma 10-18mm f2.8 - Better than the 10-24mm?
17:16
Andy Mumford
Рет қаралды 71 М.
Starting Photography on a Budget in 2025, This is What I'd Buy.
15:22
Curtis Padley
Рет қаралды 662 М.
FX30 - Sigma 18-50 or Tamron 17-70? - Well, It Depends
16:00
Thomas Fransson
Рет қаралды 63 М.
CAMERA METERING EXPLAINED: Spot, Evaluative, Partial or Center?
10:31
PhotographyExplained
Рет қаралды 336 М.
SONY 24-50mm f/2.8 G - Is This TINY Lens Any Good?
11:15
Kyle Meshna
Рет қаралды 33 М.