The whole arrow thing really wasn't as black and white. They used both types of arrows. Just like a hunter nowadays they simply picked their ammunition depending on the animal they wanted to shoot. It would only make sense to use your strongest arrows for large animals with thick hides to inflict as much damage as possible. But you wouldn't want to waste your valuable stone arrows for small nimble targets like rabbits or birds because you'd miss a lot and a wooden arrow would be enough to kill it anyway.
@skilletborne7 ай бұрын
I don't know if this was available knowledge at the time, but broadhead arrows are definitely well understood. Adam was right about bleeding out, but not just for faster death, but for an easier trail to follow. The triangular shape of the head also makes it walk deeper into the tissue causing extra damage as the animal runs Lastly, hunting is a long, hard experience. Even if the difference was as small as Jamie thought, a single arrow fired could be the culmination of days of work - you need that one shot to be as much in your favor as possible.
@frizzlethecat20847 ай бұрын
Also, the arrowhead is re-usable if the stick gets damaged (by, for example, getting broken off when the animal runs away). Once the animal is dead, you can dig out the arrowhead and use it again on a new stick. That would cut the work-time to nearly none. And, if you were traveling to a different location, you wouldn't necessarily have to carry all your arrows. You could, though, carry a lot of arrowheads in a small pouch.
@holli9876 ай бұрын
The arrow head would also help keep the arrow inside of the animal, while the wooden one would be much more likely to fall out
@3fast5you5 ай бұрын
Let's not forget that if you make a lot of arrows, you're gonna be good at it, and it's gonna be faster to make them lol
@entropy6165 ай бұрын
internet was shit at the time and they were playing dumb most of the time
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
Stone arrowheads have another advantage that many people don't know about. Living tissue will constrict around a stab wound. Stone and glass are sharp at a molecular level and will continue to cut the tissue as the animal moves which means the tissue will not be able constrict and thus the animal will not be able to stop the bleeding. It also causes the animal to want to bed down instead of continuing to move. Stone arrowheads are less durable than steel broadheads, but if your shot placement avoids bone the stone will kill faster than modern steel.
@NateyC2146 ай бұрын
I'm just imagining old school cavemen arguing over these youngins and their new flint arrows that take forever to make.
@rockid79705 ай бұрын
"It's a gimmick sonny"
@derrickstorm6976Ай бұрын
"I liked things better back in my day"
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
None of them would argue. It's unfortunate that the mythbusters didn't look for an outside expert on this myth. There are hunters that use primitive weapons. A wood shaft might be deadly eventually but living tissue will constrict around the arrow which means no blood trail and a wounded animal that can travel farther. A stone tip continues to cut the internal organs as the animal moves leading to a significantly faster kill, more blood trail and an animal that wants to bed down instead of running. Stone tips are still the best hunting tips as long as your shot placement is good and will kill faster than modern steel broadheads.
@DeCode3436 ай бұрын
Arrowheads - sharpened wood tip: What they could hardly test is the fact that the arrowhead stuck in a moving animal will grind out a pretty big hole over time. That will make it bleed more.
@markshark75214 ай бұрын
And they had plenty of time to make arrowheads while watching the Flintstones😂
@jacquesbarnard36904 ай бұрын
The flint arrow heads are reusable, how many shots will it take to blunt the wooden tip?
@KandiKlover21 күн бұрын
Also he didn't do the sharpened wood tip right. You're supposed to fire harden it until the wood carbonizes for maximum effectiveness.
@heathermillsphantomlimb931418 күн бұрын
They also help the arrow stay in the animal, whereas a wooden tipped arrow may eventually fall out as the animal moves.
@hornetscales827417 күн бұрын
Also have to consider the target has bones: Can't imagine the wood tip holding up to that.
@leadslinger10 ай бұрын
RIP Grant. You will be missed
@IvanIvanoIvanovich20 күн бұрын
My favorite part of this episode is the idea that anyone would wear jeans to go skiing.
@LassetUnsSpielen8 ай бұрын
DeWalt should use the last clip for their advertisment. Which drill would survive an explosion?
@JP_39126 ай бұрын
Kinda wish we had high-speed film of the bullets from the mini gun tearing through the tree
@Ma_X6417 күн бұрын
The best advertisement of a cordless drill ever! :D
@chrism48413 ай бұрын
Something else they didn't consider with the arrow tips is that they could be made by anyone in the camp, people too old or sick to hunt can knap flint whilst the others are out gathering food.
@MetalBoozie2 күн бұрын
Not just that. I've seen a documentation where an experimantal archaeologist did an arrow tip in something between 3 and 4 minutes. He said something like"If you know what you're doing, you know exactly where and how hard to hit the stone to get the shards that you want." So I think it took our ancestors way less time to create the tips.
@thorthewolf88012 ай бұрын
You tested the jeans by sliding on its weakpont. Try grabbing not the two ends of the legs, but the top and bottom part (I know the show has concluded, still I wanted to add my thoughts)
@RussWoodget16 күн бұрын
Tory did it the right way. He wrapped both end to his wrist to make sure he can grab on it. There is simply no way to grab on upper end of jeans
@DepressyDuck4 ай бұрын
Problem with the gunpowder keg. It's only about a foot off the ground. If someone's carrying it, it's either by their hip (around 3ft) or on their shoulder (just under 6ft). Meaning there's more vertical the flame will have to go up before hitting the barrel and kaboom.
@nintendolover1144 күн бұрын
It’s based off cartoons, calm down
@scrivener688 ай бұрын
They needed to test reusability with the arrows. My guess is the pointy stick would require constant resharpening.
@Kolfonik7 ай бұрын
yeah but then you just sharpen it. *shop shop* and you're done. But if the stone break! 😱
@thrillerdill7 ай бұрын
Arrow heads cause ripping and tearing on the way in. A simple point just makes a whole that can clot around the arrow. That is why bow hunters use broad heads
@tomthomas34996 ай бұрын
@@thrillerdillAlso imagine pulling out arrow with an arrowhead, that would've been hurt if not fatal while on pointy stick, while it still hurt, probably won't do further damage
@thrillerdill6 ай бұрын
@@tomthomas3499 I had a stroke trying to read your comment
@IvanIvanoIvanovich20 күн бұрын
Neither would be particularly reusable, thus the importance of replaceable fore shafts. Also worth mentioning that an experienced and specialized craftsman could make an obsidian arrowhead in 15 minutes.
@PexiTheBuilder11 ай бұрын
There is good reason hunting is allowed only with proper cutting hunting tips. "Pointy stick" would only stuck into prey blocking wound and take days to weeks to kill it, when with cutting tip example deer bleed out under minute. Bad idea to use jeans that way, maybe weakest point of them. Better put both legs over and grab ancles and waist for best strenght..
@johnowens899210 ай бұрын
Also the tip can be continually reused
@reaganharder148010 ай бұрын
@@johnowens8992 Assuming you're able to recover it, which is not a guarantee.
@kikixchannel10 ай бұрын
@@reaganharder1480 Yes, but many times you will be able to recover it. If not, then that hunting method wouldn't have been useful in the first place. Besides, I assume there are some animals whose hides are too hard for wooden-tipped arrows to begin with, that stone-tipped arrows may be able to penetrate. Though I don't think those are animals humans would want to hunt in the first place, I'd imagine it's better to have arrows that can hurt them in case you need to protect yourself from said animals.
@eline80874 ай бұрын
Perhaps the glass arrowheads take longer to make, but then, if if the arrow breaks or something, you can recycle, costing you less time in the long run? I also imagine you'd have to resharpen the point less often with the glass.
@KandiKlover21 күн бұрын
Also with sharpened wood tips you're supposed to fire harden them until the wood carbonizes. Also this is not an either/or type conundrum or even a conundrum at all. It's normal in archery since it's inception to use whatever arrow the situation and need dictates. The only reason you only find stone is that all the wood has disintegrated over time so they came to a false conclusion based on a poor and unscientific observation.
@IvanIvanoIvanovich20 күн бұрын
With stone and wood, depending on the (pre)historic context, fore shafts could be used. This allows damaged heads to be replaced or different types to be switched out in the field depending on circumstances. The same goes for the older technology of atlatl darts.
@joshmartin646416 күн бұрын
That chain saw must have been dull as hell. Cutting through a pine that size should have taken less than 45 seconds. I've cut through a walnut tree about that big in about 30 seconds. And walnut is much harder than pine.
@basis70893 ай бұрын
btw with the arrow heads, the reason the arrow heads are whats found is because the stone remains, wooden arrows would degrade over time even if they did use them
@terrydarhk2 ай бұрын
*Survival Bias
@basis70892 ай бұрын
@@terrydarhk precisely just as inanimate objects
@samable7724Ай бұрын
Jamie mentions it in the episode
@nikolaiiscoolguyproduction480723 күн бұрын
Conveniently Jamie mentioned that exact thing
@nugboy42022 күн бұрын
They SID just say that.
@BassFlapper6 ай бұрын
Adam really loved up to his name this episode! Adam SAVAGE Hillarious.
@AND-od5jt8 ай бұрын
13:28 With the arrows w/o tips you actually prolly could... the size of the wound is the main issue (you want it as big as possible)
@Zorothegallade-rpg7 ай бұрын
Having the arrow become lodged so that the target either can't pull it out or has to enlarge the wound to do so is also a great advantage.
@Kaeseloch7 ай бұрын
Stoneheads could have been wider in diameter causing a greater wound than woodarrows. And maybe they were favorable in things like sliding through bones (ribcage) and ligaments (joints)
@RamenHutt23 күн бұрын
With the sharpened stick the arrow plugs the wound, especially on large game. Without the cut in the wound channel you would have to turn your prey into a porcupine to kill it unless you hit something extremely vital.
@EinarEle6 ай бұрын
They've made an error in their thinking about arrow heads. They're looking the time it takes to chip out and arrow head and comparing that to sharpening a stick and concluding it takes many times longer, but that's not how an arrow is made. Suitable sticks have to be found, fletching needs to b gathered, the sticks need straightening over a fire, glue needs to be made, the fletching needs to be fixed on and then the arrow head goes on. The time taken for that final step that produces the best arrow is only part of the process. Without the arrow head nearly all the rest of the time is needed and the end result is less effective.
@Anterwaare3062 ай бұрын
Exactly my thoughts
@RaffyMaBoiАй бұрын
So, you mean your spending all that time to make the arrow, might aswell go all in and make the arrowhead rather than leaving it as a point?
@EinarEleАй бұрын
@@RaffyMaBoi Unlike the version Mythbusters (and subsequently lots of KZbinrs) show making an arrow shaft isn't jut sticking some feathers on a stick. It's finding the best sticks, it's straightening the stickers, it's finding the feathers, finding the resin to make the glue for the fletchings, making the glue, softening and splitting the tendons to make the string that holding the fletchings on. Chipping the arrowhead, especially when you've done it hundreds of times before, isn't five times longer than making the arrow, it's a smallish part of the total. A pointed stick with fletchings might have some affect, but after the time and effort put into making it you'd want it to be as effective as possible, or you've wasted that time. Not getting this equation right is right is the difference between living and starving to death.
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
@@RaffyMaBoi Its more than that. A straight wood shaft won't kill the animal fast enough, its also unlikely to leave a blood trail. A stone tip kills faster than even modern steel broadheads. Hunting is not only about making a kill, if you don't recover the animal all your time is wasted. There were arrows that didn't use stone points but they were used to hunt birds and small animals. People who hunted large animals always used a broadhead.
@scottm8518 күн бұрын
If they included all the things you mentioned, it still takes longer to make the one with the arrowhead, as all the other things have nothing to do with the tip, they're identical. Since this wasn't about what arrow shaft type was used, what they said and did was completely valid.
@andrewjames29324 ай бұрын
Why did no one think to roll the jeans like a cable? Put one leg in the other, even it out, then twist the jeans into a cable.
@Forastero01111 ай бұрын
Such a great show
@digdugbingo9 күн бұрын
I know that there is a lot of information in this show. However, Kari just blows all that shit away. She just turns a show starring a bunch of nerds into something special. Something actually not so nerdy. Sometimes... This episode, when she gets to fire a freakin machine gun is so fu@%#! damn cool. I mean holy shit, I haven't had the chance to fire a machine gun yet. Anyhoos, and she is super cute too. Which I think Adam and Jamie obviously exploited. I mean, the Mentos myth when she was wearing a red bra and a lab coat was just smoookinnn fuc#$@! hot!!! I mean damn... That more or less made the entire show...
@charisanna49148 ай бұрын
They should have gotten an expert flint knapper if they truly wanted to time making arrows. Have you seen Phil Harding knap flint? There wouldn't have been that much difference
@Zorothegallade-rpg7 ай бұрын
But how much flint could a flint knapper knap if a flint knapper could knap flint?
@Canadian_Zac6 ай бұрын
Yeah, they tested the time with a guy who's never worked with Flint before. They'd have spent a lot of time and gotten good at making them well, and quick. Plus, its not like they had super limited time. You couldn't really go wandering around after night fall. So you could spend several hours after the sun goes down in the cave by a fire, just making arrowheads for tomorrow's Hunting.
@Zorothegallade-rpg6 ай бұрын
@@Canadian_Zac And that's how we lived before Netflix. Sheesh.
@borntoclimb711610 ай бұрын
I love the fan theory episodes, lot of interesting and nice ideas.
@DoRullings7 ай бұрын
This was by far one of the episodes I had most issues with when it was aired. The arrowheads were made for because they served an important function and it is highly unlikely that a stone age man made arrowheads for decoration. We find many preserved arrows made of wood here in Norway now that have been preserved in a glacier for hundreds to thousands of years including arrowheads made of a variety of different materials, including as bone, shell, mussel, bronze, iron, etc. This is found in Jotunheimen, a mountain area named after the home of the jotnene, the giants in Norse mythology. The glaciers melts fast now and uncover a lot that has been lost in the snow and has been preserved in the ice. I have searched and tried to find out if they have found an arrow without an arrowhead or a splinter for where the arrowhead was attached, but so far I have not found any. They used arrowheads of hard material all the time. If you want to watch the archeologists uncover old Norwegian arrows and other stuff you can go to the channel of the archaeologists who works there called: "Secrets Of The Ice".
@Druguaer123457 ай бұрын
They don't say they made them for decorations. They say that having the (Technology) in this case the arrowhead would have been seen as 'bling' and impressed the cave ladies. Because you were more advanced. 😢🎉
@Druguaer123457 ай бұрын
I bet you had issues with it considering you didn't understand what they were talking about
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
@@Druguaer12345 Thats stupid, and a very modern biased view. If you are surviving hand to mouth you cannot waste time on luxury. Survival is hard. The stone provides an advantage that the mythbusters could've understood if they had put some thought into the test. Stone has molecular sharpness and will continue to cut anytime the animal moves. Stone is still used by some modern hunters because it kills the animal faster than modern steel broadheads. The animal shot with stone also travels less distance than the animal shot with steel. The use of stone was about efficient hunting and survival. It wasn't some bling that you showed the ladies.
@dirtrider8818 күн бұрын
close your eyes 30:11
@DrBarbequeSauce11 ай бұрын
Yay! Symmetrical sound
@RootedHat6 ай бұрын
Stereo*
@Goalsplus2 ай бұрын
What type of arrows do "natives" use nowadays? There's still a few tribes around the world who hunt with arrows. And why all the talk about large animals? Small animals and birds are much more abundant and wood or flint would work equally well as far as killing goes. A rabbit with a wooden arrow through it isn't going far. Accuracy over distance may be a factor.
@andygeary3531Ай бұрын
Kari's face looked so serene while firing the minigun 😅
@giannisksanthopoulos43005 ай бұрын
pause exactly at 27:16, i thought at the moment "WTF are they drawing here"..i was so confuse at first 🤣🤣🤣
@lu44146 ай бұрын
Best ad possible for that drill
@sarah2585957 күн бұрын
Another element i'm not convinced about for the arrow thing: they kept going on about the efficiency of making the arrowheads, but efficiency _to what end?_ did they have a quota? were people's stone age bosses getting on their cases about stone age quarterly reviews? it feels like a very modern perspective. the arrowheads perform better and don't take a starve-to-death amount of time to make, which means they help you survive better, so why _wouldn't_ you spend the time? or do it while chatting, or make a tween work on it, or etc
@pepe66667 ай бұрын
given a long distance, i think the stone would have a much better penetration power than wood as shown here, because the stone has momentum. tho that would depend if the entire arrow weighed more with a stone tip. just like why bullets are heavy as possible.
@Teabag-jtАй бұрын
The most unrealistic myth, the Thompson didn’t jam once in that. That’s unheard of, they jam if you tuck it back into the case correctly that night. That is infuriating.
@DepressyDuck4 ай бұрын
Problem with the arrow one. Does the shorter bleed out time of the arrowhead counter the extra time it takes to make it? I would do this test hands on table, start timer, make an arrow, run 25 feet, fire the arrow into a target. Pointy stick gets a 2 minute penalty for bleed out time, arrowhead gets 30 seconds bleed out time. They said the shorter the bleed out time, the sooner you're eating. But are you if even the longer bleedout of a pointy stick still makes the target drop faster than if you had to craft and arrowhead out of stone before heading out to hunt?
@RenanDavidSoriaAhumada4 ай бұрын
this is professional level, even had chapters!
@RandallChase111 күн бұрын
Would the cable being frozen (in winter) be different than it being warm (in summer)?
@AtomicHazeАй бұрын
Do we know if stone age arrows actually had feathers as stabilizers? Quite a lot goes into doing that. Not only getting a good feather, but you need some kind of adhesive (they could use pine tar) and then you want to wrap it with string or some long thin fiber. So if you've gone through the long process of attaching feathers and making sure the distance between them is equal and everything. Then attaching a tip isn't going to be the deciding factor in what takes too long. But if stone age arrows didn't have feathers in the back for stabilizing. The arrow head would definatly help in the accuracy department.
@IvanIvanoIvanovich20 күн бұрын
We have historic examples of stone-pointed arrows from the 19th and even 20th Centuries in North America. Not to mention atlatl darts that predate the introduction of bows, some of which are also fletched as preserved in caves. From a functional aspect, a straight and well balanced stick and fletching is a time sink but can be made to last longer with replaceable fore shafts.
@double-h-farms11 сағат бұрын
In the Navy we used jeans as a flotation device, you knot both ends of the leg and then jump into the water holding onto the waist end and just like it fills with air and your pants float..
@humaux22 күн бұрын
I can confirm when I was a much dumber teenager, years and years ago, I used a semi auto shotgun to cut a pine tree down. It took lots of shells and some time but it is possible.
@PyccoloSantos7 ай бұрын
its weird to know adam is just 3 year old than Tory and Grant.
@Okurka.7 ай бұрын
Grant stopped aging.
@FreakGeSt3 ай бұрын
@@Okurka. oof
@MADExCLEARxMEDIA11 күн бұрын
As for the diff in arrow heads, a sharp stick will just fall out or be pulled out, the flint head anchors itself and continues to cut,
@Schulzffw7 ай бұрын
This Chainsaw must be so blunt
@draco84oz7 ай бұрын
You'd be surprised how hard it can be to cut through a tree depending on what type of wood it is - hardwoods do take longer to cut through, and you don't want to force it in case it disrupts the course of the chain. Also, pro tip - never use a chainsaw on a palm tree. Not unless you like cleaning out the chain and the guide for an hour or so afterwards...
@seanfoltz764518 күн бұрын
They actually did the powder keg routine in a movie - the guy has a large barrel and is attempting to race it to the castle gate as the burning powder follows him but the burning powder reached the barrel before he reaches the gate - Flesh and Blood was the movie.
@chriswiththehoodie56609 күн бұрын
Wish they tested the arrowhead against bone because wood likely wouldn’t penetrate
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
I cannot imagine a scenario where the fire on the trail of gunpowder would surprise the person holding the barrel.
@redneckinfantry505914 күн бұрын
A Thompson submachine gun fires a pistol round so it is considered a submachine gun. A SAW is a light machine gun and fires 5.56 rounds (around the same size as a 223) and the mini gun uses 7.62 which is the same round as used in a m240 medium machine gun so the mini gun is only considered a medium machine gun. A heavy machine gun fires .50 caliber or higher round also known as the round fired by the m2 browning (ma deuce) heavy machine gun
@redneckinfantry505914 күн бұрын
They should've used a ma deuce for the finale
@TheShieldery5 ай бұрын
U got anymore of those Pixeles?
@yourmuse44616 ай бұрын
Wonder if you could use your belt instead of the jeans. Put it around the line, buckle it up and then use the buckle since its metal, not the leather part
@jefo24054 ай бұрын
Someone who is good at flint napping can probably produce 100 arrowheads in a day. Look at how fast Phil Harding (Time Team et al) knocks out a spearhead from flint. I would even go as far as to say that someone with the right knowledge and tools can craft a decent arrowhead in 3-5 minutes. Stone arrowheads increase reuseability, especially if you miss your shots (unless you hit rocks) whereas a wooden arrowhead will break no matter what you hit. Of course you can resharpen it just as fast.
@Matthew-h6e7 ай бұрын
We're all ignoring the fact that on the zipline jean eascape, the sliding guy would just slide down to the very next chair behind him?
@ShadowManceri4 ай бұрын
Size of the game also matters. Pointy stick is fine for rabbits. But try that against a bear and you only make it angry. It's hard to make draw strong enough for the just wood stick not to shatter on impact. It's well worth the time making the arrow head against bigger game. Doesn't really matter if it takes a week to do it. And reason why stone tips are found more is because stone just preserves better.
@xJokerzWild21 күн бұрын
Man, i wish they used 30-06 for the Machine guns or 8MM mauser. Most of the WWII 'machine guns' were chambered for those, and would definitely take a chunk out of a tree with just a few shots. & the zipline theory is still plausible. They used cable car lines, which are notoriously thick & dont exactly have a lot of slack to them.
@Wanton1105 ай бұрын
What if the arrows hit bone, would the wood point do as much damage as a flint end?
@d_pete3615 сағат бұрын
The flint napped arrow head won't come out as easily. If the game runs after being hit, the arrow head will stay in and continue to cause damage as the animal runs whereas the pointed arrow would just fall out.
@storrentMC18 күн бұрын
Now THIS is television
@richardcurry3662 күн бұрын
You should have tested what angle it would have taken instead of stopping at the 25° angle .
@joelepack93811 ай бұрын
The thing is flint head arrows will continue to do damage causing the target to bleed even more while it’s running away. The head keeps cutting.
@saucierboar26014 күн бұрын
It should be pretty obvious that ANY gun can cut down a tree if you shoot it enough.
@SpookyWatcher11 ай бұрын
Rip old buster
@RamenHutt23 күн бұрын
For the question "can you cut down a tree with a gun" any answer other than, YES... with enough ammunition. Is completely false. There are even videos of people cutting down trees with slingshots.
@saucierboar26014 күн бұрын
Another good reason to use stone arrow heads it that they are more reusable than sharpened sticks.
@WeinertronerКүн бұрын
13:56 🤦🏻♀️the spines are too flexible to test for accuracy. Second arrow heads do take longer to make but only because the objective is to lodge and penetrate the vital organs and do more damage than poking holes hoping it will drop.
@The5rude8 ай бұрын
Why am i so reminded about austin powers?
@Okurka.7 ай бұрын
Why am I so reminded about Rosie Jones?
@VeggeMight6 ай бұрын
Every episode this was my favorite expulsion
@spacemandan797115 күн бұрын
WTF kind of drill is that that survives 2lbs of gunpowder exploding?? I want that drill.
@markshark75214 ай бұрын
How did they know they put feathers on the shaft of arrows, and any bowhunter will tell you that you rarely shoot a animal from 10ft away, as a arrow would tumble trying to shoot any distance! So they should have tested firing arrow from 15-20 meters away and they would have gotten there answer why arrowheads work
@greenfox765719 күн бұрын
22:33 is eye black a baseball thing? I thought (American) football immediately
@thni17035 ай бұрын
What if you wring the pants and only use the legs where they are not sewn. The would be harder, have less surface to get stuck and should thereby go smoother
@Lee-At-Green-Pheonix-Rc2 ай бұрын
The first gatling gun the grandfather of the mini gun were mainly owned by rich or the aristocrats used to cutt trees down to entertain guests at parties
@vic1373 ай бұрын
I think for the arrow it's just that the cavemen thought stone tipped arrows are better so thats what they used.
@AliZafarshah4 ай бұрын
Adam is hilarious!
@randallclemons86388 күн бұрын
About the arrow heads, there is a reason you over looked. Same reason hunters use razors today. When the animal is shot, it is instinctively going to run. When it runs, the sharp flint is going to move around and cut up the inside of the animal. Doing more damage and making it go down faster. You have to physically track the animal, the big ones, after you shoot them. The Arrowhead is going to make it bleed more from the internal damage it does when the animal runs.eans it goes down faster and less tracking. A wood point won't do that. It's going to flee a lot longer and you may not find it at all. It could actually survive it. With small animals like a rabbit, yeah, it could work. Not all arrowheads were works of art. I like to tell people you really think people back then didn't half ass things..... Like people still do a lot today. Lol. But yeah, if you had to, you could use a sharp stick. And at one point, it was what they used. Until they figured out you can bring the animal down faster with a a razor sharp rock inside of it, to cut it up as it runs, after you shoot it. Even today, no matter if you use a gun or an arrow, you have to find the animal after you shoot it. The blood trail also helps. They taught us that in that hunters education class that made all school kids takes in my state, when we were growing up. Then they gave you an orange card with your name on it. And you couldn't get a hunting license unless you had one. Also, they used an atlatl (not sure how you spell it but it was a throwing stick) used to launch the arrow way before they figured out the recurve bow. And the weight from the Arrowhead would help the arrow fly further. You didn't want the arrow to go all of the way through the animal. You wanted it to lodge inside so when the animal ran, it would cause that internal damage.
@badad016611 ай бұрын
I wanna see Jamie and Adam re-unite and hug. Just once.
@Okurka.7 ай бұрын
Adam said too many bad things about Jamie.
@Joker-ik1sp6 ай бұрын
@@Okurka.They had beef?
@beehambonio33785 ай бұрын
The tendrils of Jamie's moustache reaching out to embrace his former colleague
@SteveWoodford-yz8dcАй бұрын
With the trees the gun was a handheld GE M 134 mini gun
@jeffburnham661117 күн бұрын
The jeans technique was all wrong. They should have folded the jeans horizontally on top of each other, then put it over the line. This way you have no seams that can rupture or catch on the line.
@nintendolover1144 күн бұрын
My question is, who wears jeans skiing? If you’re stuck on a ski lift wouldn’t you be wearing waterproof ski pants that are smoother
@joshmissen42586 ай бұрын
Biggest complaint about the arrowhead stuff was the the fact that they didn't have someone who is experienced at flint knapping for the time trial. Yes flint arrowheads are harder to make but for an experienced "professional" it wouldn't be as much of a time difference. Also ancient hunter gatherers had less stuff filling up their time so investing time for a small improvement in hunting ability was probably worthwhile for them.
@codyhughes44727 күн бұрын
Who else saw that explosion and thought the drill made it for sure?
@williamgray810419 күн бұрын
It's so the flint would break off inside the animal and tear it's way around every time it moves
@splatninja944718 күн бұрын
I have that sword!!! The thing weighs a metric ton. The sword in Jamie the barbarians picture.
@bishopsteiner71346 ай бұрын
2200 rds for a single tree... so.. about $2170 if buying bulk 147g FMJ (today ..2010, one might get it for a bit under $1000, depending on source)..... jayzuz.
@jonathankamysek799810 күн бұрын
43:34 needs more research and man it's been a long time since i last saw this show i think i was a kid at the time
@unfortunately_fortunate2000Ай бұрын
29:11 I feel like the only thing this myth would actually accomplish is degloving peoples hands...
@zakariyasuleman996118 күн бұрын
to be fair cavemen didnt have perfect knives to sharpen sticks with
@rafaelsodre_eachday5 ай бұрын
Jeans these days are not near as good and resistant as in the good days.
@trex703 ай бұрын
Turn the Jeans 90 Degrees so that the leg seams face downwards and Pee on it. Maybe you have less friction then and it will not rip.
@wrightyy10 ай бұрын
Love the show. Adam's voices add nothing.
@SirHorned1910 ай бұрын
I would say they actually retract from the show. Thank god you can skip it on youtube.
@Okurka.7 ай бұрын
It's the same as Rosie Jones in a quiz panel.
@ferrluces526711 ай бұрын
I biggest fan in mexico
@Druguaer123457 ай бұрын
I liked when they did the man vs women one and did the emotion read test with the casts eyes when they do different expressions. And old walrus man had no expression. It did always impress me when he cracked a smile on a few occasions
@treehuger19786 ай бұрын
Chainsaw was blunt, small size compared to log and not used by a professional.
@Valfaun6 ай бұрын
the minigun is horrifying and now i wonder how long it would take to cut a body in half
@Megoover5 ай бұрын
With that caliber - a few or even a couple of bullets and fraction of a second
@audiencesmember6 ай бұрын
16:18 so good. They should've made a collection of all the kari fits from all the episodes..
@derrickstorm6976Ай бұрын
4:51 7:07 11:10 14:54
@juankfuentesr11 ай бұрын
Big fan here from Colombia
@kcnichols89689 күн бұрын
I wish they'd have gotten an M2 to use on the tree because I reckon it'd cut down a tree real nice
@NamedNameless17 ай бұрын
14:30 Thank you Jamie, that's what I was thinking. So my biggest question now is why the archaeologist didn't think of that?
@michaelnewswanger240922 күн бұрын
Because the archaeologist probably knows what they are doing and in this case Jamie is talking out of his butt. There are modern stone age tribes that we can study and we know what kind of arrows they make and why they make them. No one hunts large game with pointy sticks because even if you kill the animal you will never recover the body. Stone will kill the animal very quickly. There are actually many specialized arrows for different types of game and even completely isolated tribes make very similar arrows. So there are arrow types that were very likely made by cavemen that we don't find but they would be made to hunt different animals than the stone tipped arrows. The pointy stick is not used by anyone that has ever been studied because its not good for any game.