The Witch of Ipswich

[@JakeThrust]

You need to carry a card on you that says "Congratulations! You've just abused Section 43" Their faces would be priceless when they pull that out of your pocket

[@mcirelandosharma7411]

YES! 😂

[@dwaynekred9905]

😎👍

[@TheAIInvestor2024]

That would be priceless

[@danielderko]

😏👍

[@BlueShadow777]

Good one! 👏🏻🤣

[@30daymissionman]

The women officers are always the most aggressive. She came at you straight away and knew what she was going to do. No answer could have satisfied her to not do a search. She is a disgrace and I hope you pursue this through the courts.

[@carltonlambert7608]

It's a white knight and simp problem. You cut that out. You cut everything out.

[@barrysims9906]

Judging by that thumb ring she satisfies others as well. 😄

[@alexk3469]

A witches job

[@bucksteingold4334]

@@barrysims9906 Is that a symbol for something?

[@carltonlambert7608]

@@barrysims9906 How else will she gain promotion?

[@benderisgreat2917]

Sue the shit out of them, then go back again and thank them for the money 😂😂

[@mrwhite292]

Kerching

[@carolinewilliamson2284]

Like he did with the bully boy officer

[@bartonseagrave9605]

Her arrogance of her abuse of power is beyond her IQ.

[@MrSigmundJung]

She doesn't have. And I haven't seen her for a while in Ipswich. I think she has been transferred

[@Rhoogah]

@@MrSigmundJung Same, I’m always about town and haven’t seen her in a long time. Shame we haven’t had an update on the vid yet though.

[@nurhasan-sd2oy]

Trust me as much as they are making us safe they also do alot of bulshit. Guess what I have on my criminal record I have ,15 offenses from criminal damage to wasting police time, I served remand jail for 90+days,just completed 2 years community order and I have to go on trial for a possession of a knife in public even though it was in my shopping and my clothes inside my suitcase whilst homeless.😢

[@francishuhghes5229]

Jeez, You need to sue them, DONT let them get away with it ! !.

[@retroclickmedia4422]

"We have vehicles we need to use on a covert basis" No one knew that they were there untill she told the world

[@bazsnell3178]

Typical numpty plod!

[@soaruk3697]

@@bazsnell3178 Shouldn't be in public view then should they.

[@edweb9751]

@@soaruk3697 Exactly the egotistical morons never fail to enlighten us to their stupidity.

[@mcirelandosharma7411]

If they wanted a vehicle to be covert, why would they park it outside the very building they want it to have no apparant connection with 😂

[@alexanderduvill6878]

Its nonsens

[@Pennywise180]

After the Wayne Cousins debacle filming police private cars is a necessity.

[@AliScobbie]

@@romainreigns4639 someone shit in your cornflakes hun

[@collincovid6950]

Absolutely, and good on him for showing up the pigs

[@robertroberts3rd265]

@@romainreigns4639 lol whether he liked it or not, you could film him as long as you were in public. What evidence do you have that he's a nonce? Or did you feel like a big man saying those words from behind a keyboard? What a plonker

[@stevenlawton5319]

@@romainreigns4639 If a good cop, watches a bad cop, infringe on someone's rights or does not pull up another PC when they do something Illegal, then they too become a bad cop.

[@unhingedbracket121]

Agreed. Interesting observation that had passed me by.

[@mariac1448]

She’s so smug!! It’s unreal. I’m sorry you had to go through this

[@DaleSteel]

Well that's another £1500 compensation.

[@cryptonewbie3699]

it should be 15k

[@TheSadButMadLad]

£3k this time because he gave them fair warning and they still proceeded. And next time it's £4k. And it will keep going up each time a constable abuses s43.

[@fintonmainz7845]

It should be paid by the CRIMINALS like MaGuire who broke the law. Not the taxpayer.

[@w3w3w3]

@@TheSadButMadLad sad tbh... in the USA they get 100ks+.. UK give you fuck all... says it all really.

[@janspykerman9558]

Yes , another good spend on the homeless !!! AB number one !!!

[@TheBrawlBox]

There was a dumb cop called Maguire Whose arrests were utterly dire 'She'd cry forty-three It's the law you see!' But now she's been warned to retire !

[@franciscusgomarus5086]

🤣🤣🤣

[@therealdeal9698]

There’s a copper who acts like a witch , In fact she’s a bit of a bitch , They abused 43 , Violating AB , Her career she really should switch.

[@kennyholland4731]

@@therealdeal9698 haha Quality 👏👏👏

[@traceypace92]

If you go walking down black horse lane, Watch your back it's a bit of a pain But if you come across PC MAGUIRE Know your rights cos he's a liar

[@kennyholland4731]

@@traceypace92 beautifully put 👌

[@GetInTheVanE]

Complete abuse of power. No grounds. Her beliefs is not the law.

[@TDHurley]

That's not how it works, they just need to show to a judge/superior that their believes were in good faith "justified". That's why the more you talk to the police the weaker your case gets. This is still an unlawful search.

[@scottyscotty4558]

@@TDHurley this statement is nonsensical. What are you talking about. This search is NOT lawful under the terrorism act. Do some research on the terrorism act and searching before commenting.

[@TDHurley]

@@scottyscotty4558 I said it was unlawful you muppet. learn to read.

[@GetInTheVanE]

@@TDHurleyyeah i hear you, they can claim justification alll day long which is circumstantial evidence on paper but both videos, his and hers is hard evidence and shows nothing was justified to detain in the first place.

[@2icelollys1goat]

The belligerence of this female officer is the most shocking thing.

[@stephen3511]

AB is the underdog who stands up to the school bully…. and knocks him out 👊🏻💥

[@Skyswinger]

The frustrating thing is that woman will never understand how thick she is. Even after watching this video and listening to her words she will still not understand. So frustrating!

[@studogskoff5034]

Dunning Kruger effect. It's well worth googling that one, it sums Ms Maguire up perfectly.

[@MrTrig84]

So sad because it’s so true. Sarah was killed by the police yet this stupid bint lives and works for the police. Oh the irony

[@Juls27989]

Ignorance is bliss .. poor deluded girl.

[@Skyswinger]

@@studogskoff5034 She is Dunning and Kruger's poster girl.

[@MikeEves]

She is thick.

[@oombee5709]

Yo AB, keep making the claims and filing complaints against pathetic power abusers until they learn their lessons. Love your work,

[@AuditingBritain]

🙏🏼

[@collincovid6950]

You are very much like myself in filing complaints and taking matters before the system to show that the pigs will not be allowed to get away with things. I am, laugh, well known to my pig force, and other forces, and banned from police response as my neighbour found out when she called the pigs over my being attacked outside my head, the culprits getting the worst of it and went away blooded and crying.

[@chrishartley1210]

Making complaints is pointless, the complaints system is broken, even the IOPC says so. The only way to get some sort of action is to make a civil claim.

[@shaundixon3645]

To be honest they won’t learn any lessons as they already know what law is .it is inconceivable that they don’t know of all the auditors in U.K. are doing it . They are knowingly harassing people with the aim of stopping a perfectly legal activity that they don’t like pretending it’s the law and that likes of you and others get so fed up of harassment you stop . Paying out occasionally compensation , it’s not there money it’s taxpayers. A bit like a parking ticket is to a taxi driver it’s just another expense that some one else pays

[@shaundixon3645]

On another side note : recent high court judgement about bell / camera is harassment and data breach , could this affect you?

[@ianrosie4431]

You were punished because she didn't like what you were doing, wether it was perfectly legal or not. How many members of the public has she done that to. Disgraceful. She cared less about you complaining as she knows she's untouchable. There's a change coming hopefully.

[@petermchugh4743]

Strange how police use a terrorism legislation simply cos they’re worried about a perceived security risk. The security risk itself makes no sense - risk that can’t use the undercover cars which can clearly be seen from a public street. If so concerned don’t park them where can be seen in public. Clearly abuse of their powers. If they truly believed you were a terrorist the 4 coppers would have been much closer, would have surrounded you and would have handcuffed you and used force. No way would they stop a suspected terrorist so politely (at least I hope not)

[@ADAM_truthfinderz]

Even if they know who these terrorist's are they let them kill sir David springs to mind! 👍🙏✌️

[@geekiejesus8482]

I totally agree. If someone wanted to do this incognito, a drone would suffice and likely, satellite/Street View images contain the same data.

[@johnrowe3019]

@Expo Scotland Absolutely

[@johnrowe3019]

To me they are perverts. What if someone was rapped or something and they put their hands all over them without consent. Fucking disgusting.

[@mast3rchief536]

Bunch of pussies, they kick off about a camera but the Manchester Arena bombing happened coz security and police where too cowardly to prevent a real terrorism threat. The CCTV showed the bomber struggling to carry his (oversized) back pack, walked past police officers and was even approached by security but they let him go and blow everyone up but they won't do that to someone with a camera, they kick a big fuss over that. Pathetic people.

[@clairelees6718]

She started panicking when he said he’d win cases !! She’s going to regret this . Wow what nasty piece of work

[@chrisbevis7725]

She should be fired as this flagrant abuse of Sec 43 puts every citizen at risk while she is at large. I would not even interact with such a corrupt cop and would demand an honest officer to deal with me if it was necessary. How many times has she abused people under the colour of law either through ignorance, egotism or because she thinks she can do what she likes without even a nod to the law. Her cases should be investigated just in case she has set some innocent person up to gain points. She cannot be trusted by her community, her colleagues who she will get into trouble or by any person she interacts with. Tax payers should not be forced to pay for cops like her.

[@sojourn6697]

Don’t think she was panicking. She said a “colleague” observed him filming and asked her to come out. My guess is the “colleague” was one of the fools that manage her so she is doing what the Nazis did by just following orders.

[@billyj2502]

I think she thinks she has a 50 50 chance because she thought he said he's made 4 claims and won two but I think what he actually said was he's won 2 previously and there's 4 ongoing 😂

[@spin6076]

She openly admits she would search ANYONE with a camera 🙈

[@libanmohamed5503]

She said “My Police Station” as well …she admitted to a lot of things.

[@johnvienta7622]

Would that include speed camera vehicles and CCTV which film private vehicles every day.

[@marklittler784]

@@johnvienta7622 There's forever if's and but's with the law, circumstances alter cases, your can't case out a joint intending to rob it, you can film but you can't carry out surveillance on places or people.

[@fintonmainz7845]

@@marklittler784 she said she would search everyone

[@johnvienta7622]

@@marklittler784 , i believe that there is case law which set a precedent in the UK in regard to filming in public, including filming private property from a public place. My argument would be that the premises of a Police Station are not generally accessible by the public but not private, apart from areas that may be set aside for that purpose, which would be covered by tacit consent. It would be an interesting tactic by an auditor if they said ( when approached by the Police ) that they were lost and seeking help, as that is an acceptable reason for being on premises belonging to another person. As for the surveillance issue, are people who reside over the road from Police Stations restricted as to how long they can stare out the window?

[@fredbear-sf9st]

She obviously hasn’t read the National Police Chief Constables Associations memo. Obviously knows more than those very senior officers.

[@bjsmith5444]

Don't interrupt me, she says and then interrupts him when it's his turn to speak. I've never liked the police.

[@Flozman1982]

That’s Policing by consent 🤣

[@DavidUKesb]

All the policy do that.

[@georgepoz1789]

1 minute online and 52 likes + 22 comments!!!!! AB you are going to be a star ⭐️

[@AuditingBritain]

The Witch will

[@LetMeTellUSomething...]

AB is a star and doesn't fully realise it .. modesty Get some merch on the go

[@TheSadButMadLad]

20 minutes online and 4000 views.and 550 likes.

[@degsiemcdegface459]

It's scary how casually they abuse their powers!

[@Passport-Bro]

Harassing someone filming in public while the UK is absolutely full of actual criminals.

[@nicelad3465]

She said she is searching you under the terrorism act, then she says one of the grounds are that her colleagues have the right to a private life as well 😂.

[@AuditingBritain]

😂😂😂

[@geodun]

If you want your cars to be covert do not park them at the back of a police station all day every day where terrorists and other criminals can see them. Now having searched him, the same video is being uploaded so nothing has changed regarding covertness of the vehicles.

[@canyouwhenyourdrunk]

You couldn’t make it up

[@fintonmainz7845]

@@canyouwhenyourdrunk well she made it up. That's the problem

[@davidspear9790]

The public have a right a right to a private life too, but they don't get it. You or your vehicle can't go more than a few metres from your house without being captured on film somewhere! They seem to think they are entitled because they are cops.

[@pilgrimoutdoors-uk6177]

I bet the Male Officer was GUTTED when she dropped him right in it! What a nightmare to work along side her. it was all "I this, and I that and, I suspect"...etc etc ..until the search then it was "...My male colleague". She never asked him once for his opinion, his input, his thoughts, his beliefs or if indeed he had any grounds to believe... Great TEAMWORK from the Female Officer there. ...... NOT. She is the kind of Officer that gets OTHER people in trouble.

[@stephenadams9767]

no way will the male pc be gutted he is to thick

[@patthewoodboy]

If I was the male officer I would have said .."its all yours , you do the search" or is she the station bike ;-)

[@pilgrimoutdoors-uk6177]

@@patthewoodboy My guess is he is on Probation or on his initial 'Street Duties' course straight out of training and she is his Mentor (a senior PC), hence why she was showing off and wouldn't allow her ego to take a back seat in front of this Junior Officer. She never included him in ANY of the basics of the initial contact and grounds. The male Officer is already picking up these terrible practices from her and sadly, will carry them forward in all of his future public interactions.

[@larryforeman7157]

He's whipped. He is her puppy.

[@MS-eo6mn]

the male as guilty as her allowing it to happen when he know it was wrong. And now likely to face sexual assault allegation as well as false imprisonment and common assault battery. Silly boy.

[@ianjames7280]

If there were a genuine fear for security, the back of the police station would be fenced and gated.

[@marklittler784]

Absolutely totally stupid place for covert cars used in anti terrorism to be parked anyway, any terrorist with even peanuts for brains would use a covert camera to film whilst delivering doughnuts.

[@svenpoletka5236]

Suspicious how they place those cars in plain sight and then violate people who see them.

[@TheMick991]

@Sir Scofferoff I think it was a bitch?

[@leethornley2480]

She is a joke , he is a little lamb, Cars cannot be traced online

[@omarshah9585]

They are so thick. She was on a proper power trip

[@stiz]

Imagine having to go home to that moose!

[@Peppzzii]

speechless..

[@alanjones4030]

abuse of the innocent will cost them money

[@valentinius62]

She certainly wasn't speechless. My ears actually hurt after listening to that crow going on.

[@westboundbadger]

@@alanjones4030 Not them personally sadly,...

[@_-_-_-6670]

It goes to show how disgusting their behaviour is when they KNOW they're being recorded!

[@_-_-_-6670]

Alan, until it comes from their wages or costs them their job, nothing will change.

[@greddy_v2]

Hows the claim on this one going AB?

[@FarangKyAy]

"let me finish, don't interrupt me" Then when it's AB's turn to speak, she interrupted him several times...so not only she abuse her powers but also she expect a respect that she doesn't give back...and she threw her colleague in the path of a civil claim ...nice job.

[@johnscott4693]

Well said. That annoyed me too.

[@jdk3]

she really was the height of ignorance and rudeness

[@adamphillips5215]

@@michaeldavies9533 If you are a barrister I truly pity your defendants if the above level of literacy is anything to go by.

[@RiverMersey]

@@adamphillips5215 ditto - I've just offered a rather more lengthy version of what you said!

[@johnscott4693]

@@adamphillips5215 I usually prosecuted. Retired now. But KZbin proves interesting, and still do the occasional case (for free) last year DWP … ten minutes to win £40,000. They were terrible. Fraudulent. Stupid. Easy work.

[@drchancer1098]

This female represents everything that's wrong with our public servants... we don't want her and big changes are coming!

[@drchancer1098]

@@SusanRoseArt That's just your twisted perspective but these public servants only have imagined power and it's coming to an end!

[@drchancer1098]

@@paulwhitte It's the public servants that are antagonistic. Search and detain has not improved anything except in the minds of the uneducated and delusional who think communism works for the people!

[@awraith4569]

What changes are coming?

[@GailOwens]

​@@awraith4569Sadly things will only going to get worse.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

6:58 AB: "So basically you think anyone with a camera - you can search them. Witch: "No, filming the back of the police station, yes". So why has the witch not charged Google under the terrorism act? Google have photos of the station, from above and at the back, and the Google Streetview car even went into the car park.

[@AuditingBritain]

👍👍👍👍👍

[@larryforeman7157]

It's part of their ego trip that they think their cars are special.

[@brainfreeze9481]

Great point

[@andrehulse11]

I think auditors should go and film The Cars purposely I think we should know the names of the police and there addresses

[@lindacousins9603]

Send a drone up ,she can try and get it on her broom.

[@nosimpingnocap]

Half a million soon and you're verified now, congrats AB

[@AuditingBritain]

Thank You🙏🏼

[@phillipowens5380]

@@AuditingBritain Hi AB I hope you take further action against these corrupt poilce officers and making a civil claim at the back of Brighton police station keep up the good work and our free time in bringing us these videos

[@ChocolateMilk..]

@@AuditingBritain Got yourself a new one now. Well not really new, but I haven't watched any of your videos for a long, long time. I unsub any auditor that doesn't follow up harrassment and unlawful arrests etc.

[@donmacrae3855]

Keep us updated on the outcome of the civil action mate 👍 Love you work peace ✌️

[@zoltar666pz]

what a joke the police are

[@rsqyoung]

ABracadabra - AB the auditing wizard and Witch Finder General, casts his spell on the Witch of Ipswich.

[@bazsnell3178]

Perfect comment.

[@AuditingBritain]

👍👍👍

[@tilerman]

I'm never quite sure how searching someone determines whether they are a terrorist or not. To determine that surely you would have to get into their heads.

[@stevehurrell]

That has often occurred to me, what do they actually achieve other than inflating their egos ??

[@G-ra-ha-m]

@@stevehurrell Harassment and fear: Fear is their currency.

[@MELLYBOY58]

Its if the backpack goes 'Bang' then they'll have ya 🧟‍♂️🧟‍♂️🧟‍♂️✌✌🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@rgc9125]

I always think they’re looking for loose wires hanging out of two mobile phones taped together, never happens though it’s always a pouch of tobacco and a bus ticket

[@jubear1493]

@Chris Oh you mean the ISIS Clubcard? That allows you to get three bombs for the price of two.

[@ade3628]

They know ur not a terrorist, just flexing as always

[@willx8837]

Another couple of grand coming your way AB

[@lordlucan9351]

Approximately £1200 guaranteed payout. That's what I usually get.

[@CarlJones-in8pm]

That much really could make a career out of that lol

[@Gustoking37]

@@CarlJones-in8pmorders camera 😂

[@CarlJones-in8pm]

@@Gustoking37 Too slow Gusto it's Ordered 😃

[@rogerborg]

Less 25% conditional fee from your solicitor.

[@tyrantwitness2482]

Can’t wait for the camera club to visit this station and show every part of it online !

[@hectorshouse5366]

Got be time for a weekly audience,

[@birdbreedinguk9979]

We all need to go together one day 🤣🤣🤣

[@daipigeon7561]

Brilliant idea that get the camera club down and about 20 auditors at the same time

[@georgeduncan5719]

The arrogance of the woman copper 👮‍♀️ unreal,

[@tyrantwitness2482]

@@georgeduncan5719 Where do you think she parks her Nimbus2000 ?

[@Volound]

very well done once again, extremely well handled. you have my respect. in anticipation of these kinds of things, you should fill your bag and pockets with documentation of the outcomes of previous civil cases where illegal searches were performed and action was brought against the officers.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

4:30 AB gave them enough warning. And the witch still carried on. That means it's even worse for them.

[@CharlesVeitch]

Witches of Eastwick booking flights to Ipswich to pick up the new member

[@djohn1671]

ips-B*TCH

[@theforcewithin369]

@@cherryvictoriaciccone9334 Nazis where doing their job and dey were hanged like witches as well Defies logic to say, "I give my consent for you to be robbed." Yet that is the basis of the cult of "democracy": the notion that a majority can give consent on behalf of a minority. That is not "consent of the governed"; it is forcible control of the governed, with the "consent" of a third party. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition people cannot delegate rights they do not have, which makes it impossible for anyone to acquire the right to rule ("authority"). Also, people cannot alter morality, which makes the "laws" of "government" devoid of any inherent "authority." Ergo, "authority"-the right to rule-cannot logically exist. The concept itself is self-contradictory, like the concept of a "militant pacifist. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition The men who wear black dresses and wield wooden hammers and refer to themselves as "the court" are seen as the madmen they are. Those who wear badges and uniforms, and imagine themselves to be something other than mere human beings, are not seen by the deprogrammed as noble warriors for "law and order" but as confused souls suffering from what is little more than a mental disorder. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition Mortals cannot alter morality any more than they can alter the laws of mathematics. Their understanding of something may change, but they cannot, by decree, change the nature of the universe. Nor would anyone sane attempt to. Yet that is what every new "law" passed by politicians pretends to be: a change in what constitutes moral behavior. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition Without the right to rule ("authority"), there is no reason to call the entity "government," and all of the politicians and their mercenaries become utterly indistinguishable from a giant organized crime syndicate, their "laws" no more valid than the threats of muggers and carjackers. And that, in reality, is what every "government" is: an illegitimate gang of thugs, thieves and murderers, masquerading as a rightful ruling body. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition In short, if the victims of authoritarian extortion, harassment, surveillance, assault, kidnapping, and murder simply stopped assisting in their own oppression, tyranny would crumble. And if the people went a step further and forcibly resisted, tyranny would collapse even more quickly. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition Everywhere you turn, be it the state or the church, the media or the schools, you are taught one thing above all else: the virtue of subjugating yourselves to mortals who claim to have the right to rule you. Larken Rose, The Iron Web Many have been able to recognize and oppose specific acts of tyranny by specific regimes, but very few have recognized that the underlying problem is not who sits on the throne; the problem is that there is a throne to sit on. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition But all ʻlegal’ means is that the government told you to do it. The way people view law these days, whether something is ʻlegal’ or not depends only on who gave the order. If the people who call themselves ʻgovernment’ do it, it’s legal. If anyone else does, it’s not. But whether the order itself is good or evil, and whether anyone should obey it, has nothing to do with who gave the order. Larken Rose, The Iron Web Every person who claims to act on behalf of "authority" is demonstrating that he has accepted an utterly ridiculous lie: that his position, his badge, his office dramatically changes what behaviors are moral and what behaviors are immoral. The idea is patently insane, but is rarely recognized as such because even the victims of the enforcers share in this delusion. Larken Rose, The Most Danger ous Superstition only those who do not need to be controlled-i.e., those already trying to live moral lives-feel any obligation to obey the controllers. Meanwhile, those who pose a real threat to peaceful society feel no moral obligation to obey any "authority" anyway. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition When enough people understand reality, tyrants can literally be ignored out of existence. They can't ever be voted out of existence. Larken Rose If, on the other hand, you value peaceful coexistence, compassion and cooperation, freedom and justice, then teach your children the principle of self ownership, teach them to respect the rights of every human being, and teach them to recognize and reject the belief in "authority" for what it is: the most irrational, self-contradictory, antihuman, evil, destructive and dangerous superstition the world has ever known. Larken Rose, The Most Dangerous Superstition

[@jameselliott8203]

@@cherryvictoriaciccone9334 I would imagine that 99 percent watching this would strongly disagree with you.

[@eddiek0507]

Lol...🤪🤣👍

[@GetInTheVanE]

@@cherryvictoriaciccone9334 Using section 43for this ain't doing her job!! and that will be apparent in the civil claim belive me. Get back in the sea.

[@plunderclat221]

She said at the end (in so many words) that she percieved you to "obviously" be someone recording for reactions, which is totally incriminating because thats the moment she has let it slip that she didn't suspect you to be a terrorist in the first place. She was also very nervous. I don't like it when nervous people have weapons.

[@fintonmainz7845]

Plus she said she was concerned about "privacy" and about unmarked police cars being identified. 3 "grounds" which have absolutely Nothing to do with terrorism.

[@Jester-Riddle]

She was too busy talking to assert herself to permit any time for her brain to operate ... Clearly she had been let off the leash to go and 'deal with' another nuisance auditor and she not only knew it, but also admitted it ! Fail.

[@AC-13]

Well noticed. Just authoritarian ego, infused with the corruption that is within that filthy sow.

[@larryforeman7157]

@@Jester-Riddle I absolutely agree. She didn't care what he had to say. She was sent to bully a citizen. The speed at which she escalated the encounter showed her original intent. She just blathered on and on with no effort to listen.

[@h.j7469]

Does carrying literature make you likely to commit a terrorist attack? God where are we going

[@cathykinn4516]

She is a monster. She makes up her mind that you have commited an offence & even in the face of contrary evidence she proceeds. As she said herself my "suspicion is" & That's IT! Her tone of voice is so robotic, doesn't matter what you say it's like she's not responding to a human being but a prompter or taking an order in a cafe. She really does not care.

[@lslad]

Cannot wait for another pass out of the cash video... Hope that WPC is on duty when you turn up with your winnings ! :-)

[@lslad]

@@drdave4430 why do you say that ?

[@Just-Tony]

"your winnings".... 😂😂 Love this !!!

[@DG-EditsYT]

@@drdave4430 they said that last time. Good luck

[@bewareofthedogs2959]

Ab catches wild pigs in the act

[@markbenjamin1703]

"extremist views or reading materials" I can bet anyone they would not consider the Communist Manifesto or Mao's Little Red Book extreme

[@rjim1]

Oh God no, they would be pleased if they found that crap on him!

[@G-ra-ha-m]

In a free country, we could read what we liked: regardless of UK Gov. Ltd's view on that.

[@meestermeesterhastings.3159]

"Ah sore".

[@BudSchnelker]

Or the Koran...

[@mcirelandosharma7411]

The English Constitution would probably be considered extremist material to these scum. They stamp all over it every single day.

[@DidierSachsCorporation]

if filming is such a security risk, maybe they should build 10 meter high walls around every police station

[@davidhawkings5548]

Exactly...if they were that worried they'd have high walls & maximum security..NOT a barrier anyone can go under or around & these 'so called' under cover vehicles would be put of sight ..obvs ...idiots .total abuse of power

[@Loddfafnisodr]

On their values, they'd rather gouge out the eyes of everyone from birth.

[@BiteWise65]

Lol northern ireland theres a reason theres not many auditors in Ireland

[@aumjohnfisher8181]

@@BiteWise65 I'm curious to know, the reasons.

[@BiteWise65]

@@aumjohnfisher8181 look up ardmore police station newry, or crossmaglen police station. Police stations in ireland are like military outposts with 15ft high walls and watch towers some of them, probably down to security risk I presume

[@kerfuffle7362]

It's amazing how searching AB helped secure those vehicles. They almost had to cancel all of their covert operations.

[@AuditingBritain]

👍

[@odakyuodakyu6650]

@@AuditingBritain surely actual covert surveillance would involve vehicles which dont park up at the local police station? they do have facilities elsewhere for their vehicles etc.

[@llewellynjones1115]

@Dreezy514 🔰 He allowed the illegal search because his civil claim then nets him a MINIMUM £1500. It's money for jam. That's why he asked her several times:- "Are you sure?"

[@marklittler784]

So they use "covert cars !" that can be covertly recorded in Police car parks and leaving and arriving, for anti terrorism use? Well that sure is intelligent!

[@marklittler784]

What they looking for, poisonous door knobs, Bulgarian umbrellas, radioactive wine ?

[@CraigDavies.]

Such a pity these people weren't on duty at the Manchester Arena when the terrorist killed 22 he wouldn't of stood a chance. Maybe they are after a job protecting M.P's.

[@wallsendfrog]

We the public love this.... keep it up..good work

[@bozos2799]

Class stuff AB make sure you let us know what happens with these claims they’re very interesting

[@daleanderin1]

The unmarked cars are public vehicles! They get spotted in public as soon as they are used to respond to an emergency. Hardly 'covert' filming, ABUSE of section 43 plain and simple.

[@guinnog2]

Tyrants abusing their powers once again. Don't be disheartened AB. Your work is important. Keep it up.

[@wesmatron]

Important how?

[@nicolanicholson4339]

@@wesmatron jog on copper...

[@michaelrejoinbradford1282]

@@wesmatron because it shows what they are like and abuse there powers

[@guinnog2]

@@wesmatron Important because the police cannot police themselves so they need members of the public to keep them honest. It's called accountability.

[@wesmatron]

@@nicolanicholson4339 Completely wrong, Captain Assumption

[@uberbeast113]

AB you are tonight's new hero for me. I don't know much about the law but I know when my mouth drops open an something feels wrong. I feel a sense of outrage. The learning bit, that's coming bit by bit, and your videos help a lot. I hope you didn't suffer too much indignity at the hands of these fools. Did you sue successfully, may I ask? Did you get an apology? Subbed.

[@jamesmurillo144]

It's always the police on a power trip. Pathetic as AB said.

[@T.H.Man.]

Another Karen...another pay cheque for you AB haha love it!!!!

[@jonmills5097]

Wow she was something else 😳 LOVES the sound of her own voice LOVES the power . Vile woman . If she puts this much effort into actual crime ( which I doubt ) she may be quite a good officer! It’s all about reputation and PR with the government police and its ‘agencies’ now not actual action just protect their own and their agenda

[@AuditingBritain]

👍

[@alanjones4030]

*YES IT LOOKED LIKE A HIDEN MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEM YOU CANT HIDE THIS KIND OF ABUSE*

[@shelleylyme6402]

Years and years of box-ticking recruitment of every inadequate wannabe bully who will use the uniform and badge as a carte blanche licence to abuse the people they are meant to serve. The police all over the UK are now infested with these appalling creeps, and this endemic corruption is quite irreversible.

[@interestedparty00]

Do you have an update on your claim against the Witch of Ipswich?

[@AsloAso]

Her boyfriend is a stuffed cat on her pink bedding. A personality like that she’s likely a very lonely person, I bet any family members haven’t spoken to her in years.

[@dominicgeorge9567]

Her ignorance is shocking

[@johncheffy4775]

They don't get it they think they deserve an explanation . They're not far from me and they all think they have loads of powers that do not have .

[@sheffieldzamo7444]

Police proving over and over that they cannot be trusted with the powers given to them. She actually thinks she can assume you are guilty, demand you provide evidence that you are not, and if you refuse to provide that evidence, then she has reasonable grounds to detain and search you. Is it because they are thick or do they just think they are untouchable? Both probably.

[@bik3-spurt776]

@@pocolol8424 It does not matter if AB is the BIGGEST BELL END in the UK, its not illegal to be a douche bag. The majority of Police are power tripping low lifes and the women are so aggressive as they have the slightest bit of power.

[@tyrantwitness2482]

Stanford experiment !

[@gordonhutchison9647]

It's because they think that they are the law and don't realise they only represent the law hence they became officers but used to be constable, their as corrupt untrustworthy as the government corporation

[@clockwork1956]

The only way to stop this is to keep claiming and winning, excellent work AB.

[@jeffjones6107]

Pair of power crazy Muppets. Well done AB for keeping your cool 👍

[@paulpovey]

COVERT CARS , PARKED IN THE STATION CAR PARK , IN FULL VIEW OF THE PUBLIC . What a ridiculous statement , that wpc saw the windows , and saw it as an opportunity to flex her muscles to her colleagues at the station . A disgrace to the force , her ego and her desire to make a name for herself were the reason for this infringement on your rights .

[@user-kn3jx3sw3r]

Filming by itself is not reasonable grounds to violate rights.

[@PINACI]

The police will never learn to stop abusing powers, especially section 43. They lost section 44 because of the abuse but now they just use section 43 as their 44 regardless of reasonable grounds. Maybe you should provide them a copy of their own NPCC advice of vloggers recording police stations for them to look at before they abuse their powers ? But I would still bet they choose to ignore it and carry on with the abuse anyway.

[@AuditingBritain]

Section 43 is used to feed their ego👍

[@DjLuisFAC]

Yea, give them NPCC advice and say you have written permission to film 😂

[@geordieal9658]

Is it right that if they think a person is a terrorist they should in the first instance contact their anti terrorism team?

[@PB22559]

@@AuditingBritain Yeah, what were they expecting to find on him. A bomb in his top pocket?

[@PINACI]

@@geordieal9658 Yes, but we all know that this is not the case 99.9% of the time because they know he's not a terrorist. IMO the main reason they abuse section 43 is so they can look for ID because as we all know ID is like crack cocaine to police officers.

[@djcoprerodrigues2780]

Section 43 Section 43(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 gives a police constable the power to stop and search any person they ‘reasonably suspect’ of being a terrorist, in order to determine whether that person has in their possession any object that could ‘constitute evidence’ that they are a terrorist. The officer’s reasonable grounds for suspicion should be based on a two-stage test: The officer must have formed a genuine suspicion in their own mind that they will find the object The suspicion that the object will be found must be reasonable In this case the officers misused Section 43 because the power doesn't give officers to search "in hopes" of finding an "object unknown to them" they must have suspicion of finding SPECIFIC OBJECT to use Section 43

[@sunnyinsanya2]

What a psycho officer. She just can't stop herself talking. At least you can walk away AB, imagine living with that every day at home.

[@Matt-wr9cc]

@Chris pigs should get with other pigs they should there own piggy dating app and stay off our civvy apps. Pigs.

[@Itstoolate496]

@Chris i had the EXACT same thing happen yesterday, I ended up blocking her because she became so abusive

[@DG-EditsYT]

Yea cops are odd one on dating scene..they will land you in it and go through your life..paranoid etc.. they NEVER stop being police..ever

[@chrish281]

That female police officer is everything wrong with the force...she let her ego get in the way of doing what was right

[@matman4464]

She pretty much just loves the sound of her own voice!🙄

[@AuditingBritain]

I can tell You for sure .Shes a bad apple.I do feel sorry for all who came across her.Absoluyely off her head and no knowledge of the law.

[@misssparky5574]

@@AuditingBritain why have you stopped asking them to call their sergeant to the scene? Some of the times he told them to un detain you as what you were doing was perfectly legal. He would have a short chat with you and they all did the walk of shame.

[@amreens9987]

She needs to home and bake a cake

[@Bestmanstan]

1. They have illegally searched him 2. They have sexually abused him 3. They have use section 43 of the terrorism act. 4. Haven’t asked to film him 5. They have wrongly asked him for his details These officers need to get a life. He should put in a civil complaint

[@EdMcF1]

Should get life for misconduct in public office.

[@Leppo7]

they need to be fired thats what is the problem, idiots like this shouldn't be in the police force simple as

[@MrJonny2324]

1: Yes 2: Come on.... 3: Yes 4: They don't need his permission, though they do need to make him aware. Also yes, he should sue for that pathetic search.

[@MrJonny2324]

@@EdMcF1 Who should get life, what are you talking about?

[@Bestmanstan]

@@MrJonny2324 Dude, I want replies on my comment to be kind, respectful and safe. I do not want people judging my comments! Please remove this comment as soon as possible.

[@Stardust_Truth_Seeker]

To have your body autonomy and rights violated because of filming the back of a Police Station that does not even have a high wall or physically sectioned off area is absolutely absurd. you handled that very well and it was clearly an abuse of power.

[@trevorphilips6306]

If only the tyrants put in that much effort catching the grooming gangs.

[@JC-mb3cq]

Too much effort. Especially when the police and the government are up to it

[@brumsgrub8633]

It's amazing how they still haven't got a clue it's him. Surely everyone police officer must know what he's doing.

[@TheSadButMadLad]

It shows the incompetence of the police that they can't even pass on the info to all police stations to not approach AB as they always lose and make themselves look like fools. Correction: Act like fools.

[@stuntman591]

She said "it's quite obvious your filming Police Stations". So why use section 43. She admitted she knew what you were doing wasn't terrorism.

[@jeffreyrichards4110]

Hey AB... Great stuff... You know when they say "that's fine"? It is because generally dont do follow up civil claims and they know it. Here in North Amarica, the public has started to do just that and the criminals are scattering when exposed to the light of the camera and litigation. Keep up the great audits.

[@tompreen3856]

3.1.1. Section 43(1) of the Terrorism Act 2000 provides a power for a constable to stop and search a person whom he or she reasonably suspects is a terrorist, to discover whether that person has anything in their possession which may constitute evidence they are a terrorist. You should just ask if they suspect you of being a terrorist. The only answer they can give is yes... if they say I don’t or no they can not use this section

[@pluckstevenson1731]

I'm getting a camera and heading for that station been a while since I've had my winky touched I will insist she does the search great job AB

[@yb2anti957]

You weirdo

[@simonb6306]

Amazes me how they will question every passerby with a camera but won’t put a solid fence up. If it’s so secure they are that worried spend some tax payers money on a fence. Security risk is so funny, if you were really gathering evidence you would do it covertly to stay longer and get more info. The investigative skills of modern policing.

[@bodysuitguy]

Cost of fence, about the same as AB will get paid out from his civil claim.

[@mareksan1123]

Exactly, if they are concerned about security then secure the premises and not just have a boom gate

[@chrisbevis7725]

Nor will they come out when their is real crime afoot.

[@robertcaffrey6097]

Her eyes started vibrating with fear and regret when she realised she completely messed up.

[@InTheFieldd]

"well it's my penis". I have never giggled so much in my life. Brilliant work AB.

[@AuditingBritain]

😁

[@fintonmainz7845]

I'm not so sure. She said it was "her" police station. Perhaps she owns all our penises also?

[@nasapayrollsystem8701]

It could be used as a dangerous weapon,

[@MajorRoadAhead]

"I'm using the Anti Terrorism Act." She says. If he was planning some terrorist activity is it likely that he would risk attracting all this Police attention in broad daylight? The answer is no, he wouldn't.

[@tohrasup]

If only the police could intercept real terrorists en route, peculiar that

[@martinkk2943]

They can not do such deep logical thinking. They are just territorial bullies. If they do not want their cars seen, build a wall. Anybody can go there and have a look - and film with a hidden camera.

[@waveman2952]

@@tohrasup When have your cops actually stopped a terrorist? Just curious.

[@craigefc]

@@waveman2952 Well. They managed to shoot a Brazilian tourist in the head because he had a backpack on.

[@theghostwatcherkeepitreal4618]

Another abuse of power another £1500 AB ❤️❤️

[@geoffpeyton6556]

Women police? Why??????????

[@benjamincarlin4021]

I've no idea.

[@christopherjohnson-cu9nr]

That police station needs a Massive audit. Every vehicle entering and leaving needs to have its registration number recorded.

[@geoffbreen2386]

that would be awesome to watch and clearly show them up as AB says "You're pathetic".

[@Mean-bj8wp]

With freedom of information anyone can get the make, model, registration and current status of any police marked or unmarked.

[@BibtheBoulder]

Is it me, or do WPC's always seem to be way more aggressive than their male counterparts?

[@mrwhite292]

Power trip

[@TDHurley]

They have to over compensate because it takes effort for a woman to be this much of an arsehole.

[@geordieal9658]

I think that virtually all the time, but then I think is it just me and my underlying views on women! Not sure 🤷🏼‍♂

[@jameson566]

They get a huge chip on their shoulders. Without the uniform they wouldn't dare approach a guy with a camera, but they know when they're working, and when they have male backup, they can do what they want without any consequences.

[@larryforeman7157]

I think it's their habit of talking incessantly and never listening. It makes it very hard to learn and improve if all you ever hear is your own blather.

[@bigbaxi]

Keep letting them abuse section 43. They will soon lose it.

[@mcirelandosharma7411]

They will never lose it. Its the most important step towards totalitarianism being 'legal'. It will only get worse as they find reasons to make the law be more intrusive. You are mistaking the fact that these laws are not intended to protect you.

[@MurrayHerts]

The only concern she said is not liking you filming private cars, how does detaining you for an illegal search make any difference regarding that concern

[@carltonlambert7608]

He's letting them stack up lawsuit's. I don't blame him.

[@nickflair2947]

"I am detaining you under section 43 of the terrorism act because my colleagues and I are entitled to a private life"..... That's what she said, right?

[@fintonmainz7845]

100%

[@goodyeoman4534]

Mindboggling stupidity and incompetence, mate. And terrifying to think such horrible people are in such positions of power (petty power though it is).

[@stvbee7479]

Just a couple of points; If they have 'TOP SECRET' vehicles they use for covert operation in that parking area, why are they in full public view? If she is concerned about the safety of their rear parking lot, why are they not making a request to the Chief Constable to put in a wall or a fence to protect it? She states just before they carry out the search that it is to satisfy 'HER' suspicion and belief, but the legislation clearly dictates that it needs to be 'objective' and not merely 'subjective'.

[@pattskatoey3139]

I was thinking the same thing. They have lockups that they use for those kind of undercover cars.She was talking rubbish.

[@gurglejug627]

She's 007 mate - just needs a pair of stilts and a brain and she's halfway there...

[@robslade2571]

In the late 90's all the unmarked police cars would park up together down Bramford Rd in Ipswich and I would go past and remember their number plates.

[@jimmydempsey6857]

Don't know why the auditor mentions the cases he's won to female cop , she's not botherd nothing comes out of her pocket, it's taxpayers that pay for it.

[@pussinboots1145]

Parking lot?i think you mean car park.

[@ChefEarthenware]

A blatant abuse of Police powers. We must find a way to hold these thugs accountable.

[@spencel4850]

So she has now told you that those vehicles are used in covert operations otherwise you wouldn’t know 😆

[@peteyfiske9107]

The female officer really does talk a lot…expressing her thoughts and conclusions before investigating the situation. She also makes up law as she delivers her speech and continually interrupts to make her points.

[@Polecat54941]

@Sir Scofferoff she at no point really thought he was a terrorist nor did her lacky and if the pigs really thought you were a terrorist they would have an armed response team show up if they had any sense at all!

[@originalherdsman3524]

I think them officer's knew exactly who, what and why he was there !! The main concern for the Police is what she was trying to explain that some of her colleagues and unmarked car's are involved in COVERT operations and he is opposing a risk to them by filming with no concidaration for that fact !!. It will not matter how high wall's and fencing is , the police will still be having their cars and faces filmed entering and exiting. If the police are investigating someone for instance spiking people's drinks at a club , they have to put officers undercover and also have to use unmarked car's in other types of investigation to blend in. If they are videoed by someone auditing then that officer and car will be useless to the investigation. Also imagine if you was a police officer and wanted to better your career in this line of policing you wouldn't be able too because of having your face on a KZbin video for everyone to see . I think the police will win this one again and make it three two , because of the lack of concidaration for covert operations angle that will be argued .

[@Odysseuss.]

@@originalherdsman3524 So they have "covert" operations running out the back of the police station. Now let's think what could possibly go wrong with that...

[@originalherdsman3524]

@@Odysseuss. why you comment on what you don't know !!!

[@cptredwell]

We’ve clearly got too many police officers if they have time to stand around talking bollocks to the public and not understanding the very laws they are supposed to enforce, these clowns prove the point clearly

[@northernthrifter8817]

They're supposed to uphold not enforce law, there's quite a difference. They like to use the terms enforcement and compliance more and more, it might seem subtle but it's an ever increasing narrative to support more authoritarian policing along with a much more intimidating uniform, the attitude just caps it off. What these morons don't realise is their setting the template for their own families and children's future misery and totalitarian control. They only employ people too stupid to see their just expendable pawns for the rich and the corporate business. They seem less and less interested in real crime and more interest in protecting the top tiers greed and corruption. How stupid do you have to be?

[@dgnash]

@@trapmafia4716 Bullshit.

[@xana7196]

It's the same when nurses and doctors were too busy dancing while claiming they had hospitals stuffed with "dying" patients during of so called pandemic

[@imani3975]

@@xana7196not rlly they were dancing during break

[@krystjanchanerley9288]

@@imani3975 They shouldn’t have It was supposed to be a pandemic

[@broken2352]

i would love to see more about the outcomes of this and any others you are aloud or willing to say i guess . love your work AB sending love from Western Australia :)

[@niall8632]

AB! Please, please set up patreon so we can support you financially. The legal expenses are not cheap and you would be surprised what your supporters would be willing to give to help fight against these power abusing scum bags. Set up something so we can aid!!

[@AuditingBritain]

Thank You Niall.Watching my videos and is enough help🙏🏼

[@onwardstotruth5810]

When WPCs & PCs start paying out of their OWN pocket they will realise the mistakes of their judgements and unlawful detainments Respect to you AB This witch will be presenting herself to Professional Standards if not they should come for her