Tons of asbestos cleared out for free. Plus lucky Larry Silverstein got a massive insurance check, then got another.
@onthetongue4 күн бұрын
@@TheRealCalPerr But he had to pay all of it for the demolition materials and to everybody involved in the conspiracy to keep silent. So it was a wash. womp womp.
@dragonslayer8114 Жыл бұрын
it just takes 2 planes
@TheProptechScout Жыл бұрын
goddamn that was dark.
@colinbarnett7441 Жыл бұрын
Too soon
@TheGuardian019 Жыл бұрын
Nah, just 1 per building.
@DangerIncFilms Жыл бұрын
@@TheProptechScoutTrust me, as a New Yorker, I’ve made darker 9/11 jokes.
@dragonslayer8114 Жыл бұрын
@@DangerIncFilms same
@AnyoneCanSee Жыл бұрын
I was wondering why he said "Largest VOLUNTARY demolition" and then I realised.
@russelltalker Жыл бұрын
Holy shit now I just realised
@ScuitarRects2 ай бұрын
Yt Dimitri Khalizov playlist 47
@rxb364 Жыл бұрын
The TALLEST "voluntary"demolition? Hmmmmmm
@Duffman19370 Жыл бұрын
Better than a RUD(rapid unscheduled disassembly)
@inssafsliti9430 Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@oSTYNCLSYo Жыл бұрын
I was wondering the same thing, 9/11.
@mrandrossguy9871 Жыл бұрын
Yeah because no way the “twin towers” would have been approved of classic demo, Besides they didn’t comedown in a “controlled way” obviously 😂
@rxb364 Жыл бұрын
@@zockblattshickleblender7758 yup .. like the saying if it looks like a duck, sounds like a duck, quacks like a duck .... 🤩
@heyitscracker Жыл бұрын
George & Dick give this two thumbs up! 👍🏼👍🏼
@joncathcart1118 Жыл бұрын
I just knew the comments wouldn't let me down. 😊
@ac164619 күн бұрын
You are not alone 🤔😁
@jobskinner83315 күн бұрын
Now I see what you mean
@Constitution1789 Жыл бұрын
Building it is impressive, but taking it down is even more impressive.
@Anna-Laurie Жыл бұрын
That’s cool 90% recycled! Thank you humanity for being this responsible
@haroon456710 ай бұрын
You're welcome.
@BlackCobaine7 ай бұрын
Im welcomed
@SD-vy7gj5 ай бұрын
Metal has always been recycled. Wer still using metals from the bronze age. It's cheaper to recycle than It is to refine. It's not new. It's not eco. It's basic, ancient economics. We don't frow away metal.
@naufalam78406 ай бұрын
Acetylene torches? No Jet fuel? Yes
@churrascodupao64108 ай бұрын
Technically the demolition of those two towers that looked very similar was also voluntary.
@ScuitarRects2 ай бұрын
Yt Dimitri Khalizov playlist 47
@robertwalker2052 Жыл бұрын
This was the former Union Carbide building. A modernist touchstone. It's loss is extraordinary, because it's achievement was extraordinary, and will not be repeated.
@guywhocomments Жыл бұрын
It was a meh example of a style with better examples within a few blocks. Anyway, it was neither yours or mine, so neither of our opinions matter.
@PeruvianPotato11 ай бұрын
Ah yes, a literal rectangle.
@Ric9hardify11 ай бұрын
@@guywhocommentsEverything matters to the mind it matters to.
@roccon42469 ай бұрын
Pretty much half the buildings in New York look the same. Seagram Building, Lever House, etc.
@jeffreyjumisko51655 ай бұрын
Never mind the other replies. International Style and mid-century buildings are under appreciated for the stamp they made on our modernist world. This was a Skidmore Owings Merril building, and it was emblematic of the period. It is a terrible loss, and the building that replaces it is vulgar, lacks restraint, and looks like it was buiilt in the worst of 1990s architectural style.
@Mik3iOS Жыл бұрын
George W Bush Has Entered The Chat
@mlb6d9 Жыл бұрын
LOL
@wongsubalai71927 ай бұрын
And Larry Silverstein pull it 😂
@silverload3622 Жыл бұрын
Just fly a plane into it apparently they fall straight down into a neat little 4 story pile
@mikebyrd82783 ай бұрын
A neat 15 acres of debris
@user-ug8wx5er1w Жыл бұрын
The cost must have been RIDICULOUS.
@jamescameron204 Жыл бұрын
Yes that's why planes are used followed by an insurance claim,,
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
@jamescameron204 yes and birds are drones sent by the government and austrillia isn't real. /s
@jaredreck88211 ай бұрын
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams...
@rodg793 ай бұрын
it can weaken it.
@Cooldude-do9ykАй бұрын
You’re right, it weakens
@kinezo1961Ай бұрын
It can if its traveling 500 mph
@QuickToThePeterCopter29 күн бұрын
Yea but fire does bro
@themagnificentche111927 күн бұрын
I’m surprised they didn’t go for the “controlled demolition” route 😂
@barryredman2803 Жыл бұрын
Ask the 9/11 commission.
@LuigiCotocea Жыл бұрын
Bruh 😂
@cyrusdubash309710 ай бұрын
Why, they lie.
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
These comments make me feel like a genius
@bronxbearbud272 Жыл бұрын
Why didn't they just smash a plane into the building? It would have burned for 20 minutes before imploding in on its own footprint. Or can you only change the laws of physics on days that end in "11th"?
@disgruntledconservativevet17983 ай бұрын
🤣😂😝😂😝🤣. I agree, they play us as fools.
@MrAwesomedude80823 күн бұрын
There are numerous eyewitness accounts to 9/11. Not one of them support the inside job theories. building 7 was hit with debris from the north tower’s collapse. Fires burned uncontrolled. And before you say anything, “Pull it” refers to the rescue operation. Pull the fire fighters out of the building because of the already terrible loss of life. If you look at other angles of the building (not the usual ones showing the north face of the building) prior to the collapse, you’ll note the raging flames on multiple floors. The beams did not melt, rather they expanded and sagged due to the fire. and with regards to explosives why the fuck would ANYBODY in government want to kill thousands of their own citizens in a building? They’d likely be noticed because of how busy the towers were, even overnight staff could’ve caught someone planting explosives. The towers had a tubular construction, not webbed steel like most buildings. Built to withstand a 707 at normal speed on a foggy day, not a 767 flying at very high speeds. controlled demolition starts at THE BOTTOM, not the top. It would also leave specific debris patterns unlike the ones found at ground zero. Additionally, you would hear explosions before collapse, and the squibs would be present before the collapse also. For there to be a controlled demolition that caused the collapse, there would need to be detonation cords found in the debris, which are YELLOW. They were not found in the rubble, just look at ground zero images. The towers and building 7 did not fall at free fall speed, if they did, the debris pile would be more uniform. The collapse was progressive because the remaining structures kept falling due to the increasing load/weight of the buildings being held up. As the floors above began to fall, they exerted increasing pressure on the floors below, causing a cascading effect that led to the eventual collapse. Tower 2 fell first because it was hit lower and at an angle instead of straight on. Hearing explosions? The descriptions of the impact and collapse were similes “AS IF a bomb went off,” for instance, or “LIKE an explosion.” Other buildings in history have collapsed due to fire burning uncontrollably. Why even involve building 7 if 9/11 was an inside job? it’s not significant compared to the twin towers. Early reporting isn’t always accurate especially with events like 9/11. And because the day was so chaotic and traumatic, descriptions and statements can be conflicting with what really happened. Operation northwoods has ZIP to do with 9/11. It was REJECTED. There has been no way to accurately tie it back to 9/11 plus it was DECLASSIFIED long before the attacks. It’s uncommon but not unusual for items that are lightweight like the Saudi passports to survive catastrophic events. Need I say more? Oh and if it was an inside job, why would it be pinned on Al Qaeda, a group that is KNOWN to be hostile to the US? “It’s all there black and white clear as crystal! You get NOTHING! YOU LOSE!!! Good DAY, sir!” -Willy Wonka (Gene Kelly)
@bruceh6135 Жыл бұрын
Bet that was expensive!!
@neoanderson7492 Жыл бұрын
About 3.50
@corners3755 Жыл бұрын
That was my first thought when he called it eco friendly. To take apart that building floor by floor by hand must have been the most expensive demolition per floor.
@crons8557 Жыл бұрын
Also the site of the largest “involuntary”demolition as well.
@vitsadelhole Жыл бұрын
Nah that one was voluntary
@rxb364 Жыл бұрын
@@vitsadelhole yes by the owner who just had it insured for billions !?!?
@CSpottsGaming Жыл бұрын
@@rxb364 I'm curious. If you bought a building in July, how long would you wait to insure it? Because having a new insurance policy in place for the massive buildings you just bought a few months before seems like something anyone with half a brain would do, rather than a sign that he's in on some massive conspiracy.
@rxb364 Жыл бұрын
@@CSpottsGaming insured against terrorism! How many insure for terrorism and then bang it happens. Also he tried to put two claims in for double the money but the insurance said no, it was one event .
@CSpottsGaming Жыл бұрын
@@rxb364 People who own very high profile buildings, particularly buildings that HAD ALREADY BEEN THE TARGET OF TERRORIST ATTACKS. You may not be aware of this because you don't bother to do any research but the WTC was bombed in 1993, so when Silverstein bought them in July 2001, it would seem quite natural to insure them against a terrorist attack. The US government and the ultra wealthy do plenty of verifiably fucked up things, you don't need to create a conspiracy to criticize them, you can just look to the things they aren't bothering to hide.
@waynep343 Жыл бұрын
That contractor needs to contact the san Francisco department of building and safety to start working on a bid to take down the leaning tower there. But there is an unfinished leaning tower in new york
@rustomkanishka Жыл бұрын
This shit is fucking hilarious. Thank you for sharing this story.
@Nonyabusiness111 Жыл бұрын
The entire city of San Francisco needs to be demolished
@rustomkanishka Жыл бұрын
@@Nonyabusiness111 you know how much wealth that area represents, mate?
@solaireofastora8609 Жыл бұрын
Nah the CIA holds that record bro
@MrUranium238 Жыл бұрын
key word here is "voluntary"
@JustPlaneHistory Жыл бұрын
Well, the terrorists "voluntarily" flew the planes into the towers
@DeepakJAT0007 Жыл бұрын
When the demolition costed more than construction !
@DesertVox Жыл бұрын
Nine11 = 2 planes BUT 3 skyscrapers went down. Look it up from non-censored sources.
@MatthewSmith-kd3mu9 ай бұрын
R U M B L E would be the best source seeing that yt has deleted my reply to you twice now.
@mikebyrd82783 ай бұрын
An 8 buildings were destroyed
@John-ou4rm2 ай бұрын
Building 7 was a voluntary demolition.
@MrDefreeseАй бұрын
About a dozen buildings were destroyed that day. Yutzes.
@screaminlordbyron776726 күн бұрын
Yeah man the CIA don't fuck around lol
@harrywalsh791 Жыл бұрын
I can't see how it cost less to tear down and build new instead of upgrading/adding on!
@stevehamman4465 Жыл бұрын
JP Morgan, hes got money bro!! One of the alleged owners of the Federal Reserve Bank.
@shutupandcolor Жыл бұрын
So your saying if I dumped a pile of sand on a hot fresh pizza, you'd pick all the tiny grains of sand out; rather than throw it out and make a new one. Building have a shelf.
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
@shutupandcolor bad analogy. Better one is putting more water in a water balloon than the balloon can handle
@allowmi11 ай бұрын
Kudos to the team for minimising the waste stream.
@SD-vy7gj5 ай бұрын
We dont landfill metal. Never have. Never will. Its always recycled. It's not new and it's not eco.
@andyhollister4610 Жыл бұрын
The fact That you used the word voluntary is I don't know how to explain ...dark maybe
@jacobviator3118 Жыл бұрын
Why??
@philswift8311 Жыл бұрын
@@jacobviator3118 9/11 was really voluntary
@ddb5736 Жыл бұрын
Or, just crash a large plane fully loaded with fuel... might not be as echo friendly... ask the terrorists for details.
@danieljurca211311 ай бұрын
funny
@PhilSaunders-c3n10 ай бұрын
It was recycled in China
@jamesfinseth157 Жыл бұрын
How much did it cost? How much money was recovered from the sale of salvaged materials?
@mohamedchahban4127 Жыл бұрын
It costed 160 million dollars
@crons8557 Жыл бұрын
About 2 Trillion dollars.
@vannersp Жыл бұрын
You could do all that, or just fly an aircraft into it. Apparently that also causes a perfect demolition 😉
@MrAwesomedude80823 күн бұрын
No one has said that the collapse was perfect. And before you say anything, building 7 was hit with debris from the north tower. Fires burned uncontrolled. “Pull it” refers to the rescue operation. Pull the fire fighters out of the building because of the already terrible loss of life. The beams did not melt, rather they expanded and sagged due to the fire. and with regards to explosives why the fuck would ANYBODY in government want to kill thousands of their own citizens in a building? They’d likely be noticed because of how busy the towers were, even overnight staff could’ve caught someone planting explosives. The towers had a tubular construction, not webbed steel like most buildings. Built to withstand a 707 at normal speed on a foggy day, not a 767 flying at very high speeds. controlled demolition starts at THE BOTTOM, not the top. It would also leave specific debris patterns unlike the ones found at ground zero. Additionally, you would hear explosions before collapse, and the squibs would be present before the collapse also. For there to be a controlled demolition that caused the collapse, there would need to be detonation cords found in the debris, which are YELLOW. They were not found in the rubble, just look at ground zero images. The towers and building 7 did not fall at free fall speed, if they did, the debris pile would be more uniform. The collapse was progressive because the remaining structures kept falling due to the increasing load/weight of the buildings being held up. As the floors above began to fall, they exerted increasing pressure on the floors below, causing a cascading effect that led to the eventual collapse. Tower 2 fell first because it was hit lower and at an angle instead of straight on. Hearing explosions? The descriptions of the impact and collapse were similes “AS IF a bomb went off,” for instance, or “LIKE an explosion.” Other buildings in history have collapsed due to fire burning uncontrollably. Why even involve building 7 if 9/11 was an inside job? it’s not significant compared to the twin towers. Early reporting isn’t always accurate especially with events like 9/11. And because the day was so chaotic and traumatic, descriptions and statements can be conflicting with what really happened. Operation northwoods has ZIP to do with 9/11. It was REJECTED. There has been no way to accurately tie it back to 9/11 plus it was DECLASSIFIED long before the attacks. It’s uncommon but not unusual for items that are lightweight like the Saudi passports to survive catastrophic events. Need I say more? Oh and if it was an inside job, why would it be pinned on Al Qaeda, a group that is KNOWN to be hostile to the US? “It’s all there black and white clear as crystal! You get NOTHING! YOU LOSE!!! Good DAY, sir!” -Willy Wonka (Gene Kelly)
@alexandersuvorov200223 күн бұрын
@@MrAwesomedude808How many US men were killed and injured in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq after 9/11? Did they find Bin Laden in Afghanistan? Did they find WMD in Iraq? And you are wondering how can US govt do this to its citizens? It was trillions dollars conspiracy. The greed level was insane as well as their actions. Conspirators really wanted to take it to a new level of control and domination. Hence Patriot Act and restriction of freedoms for everyone. Hence cover up with drama of everything related to 911. The largest terrorist attack in US history and all the evidence was shipped to China for recycling. I really don’t get it why would anyone invest their time and energy defending evil. May be it is comforting to think that “folks in govt” take care of you and you can just relax and watch your favorite Netflix show. Unfortunately, denying facts just makes false sense of security. More you keep denying the obvious, more it will popup again and again (e.g. COVID-19)
@paulkersey98579 күн бұрын
@@MrAwesomedude808 If you believe all that junk, I pity you.
@bob-gk3to Жыл бұрын
Paint iron ferrite in the hallways stair wells taking insurance policy double a day before it happened
@orobinczaia5527 Жыл бұрын
World's largest removal of forensic evidenced.
@bjohnston3659 Жыл бұрын
I missed the part when he said WHY they were doing it
@katal00311 ай бұрын
bc the building was old? bc they wanted a new one? idk man normal demolition stuff lol
@JackArkitekt10 ай бұрын
Chase who operates and own building doesn't want it anymore, new Taller 1382 feet tall building already topped out with entire 60 floors occupied by Chase Worlds Headquarters only!!! Building is have 72 built floor including cellar, mezzanine, and mechanical floors!!! New tower have setbacks and will have Art Deco looking stylied facade.
@bjohnston365910 ай бұрын
@@JackArkitekt thanks!
@wyomingadventures6 ай бұрын
That building was damaged during 911.
@bjohnston36596 ай бұрын
@@wyomingadventuresthat's a more selfless explanation, thanks very much!
@LMays-cu2hp Жыл бұрын
Thank you fir sharing.
@LMays-cu2hp Жыл бұрын
I still love New York since I live there but in the 1970s.
@elvisperezley9244 Жыл бұрын
Why was it demolished?
@shrinivaasraghul8325 Жыл бұрын
It’s the Old JPMorgan headquarters building. Making way for the new headquarter building at the same site. The construction is already halfway through.
@jamesedmond3351 Жыл бұрын
To start a war, and make a lot of money.
@terrenceswanson944 Жыл бұрын
All he said was lead paint and asbestos. Sometimes you reach a point where it costs more to renovate a building than to demolish it and build a new one. He said they were also able to recycle ie steel from beams and girders.
@madmazdamini Жыл бұрын
Takes 2 planes and seconds these days 😢
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
"These days" 24 years ago
@zenapsragegaming9658 Жыл бұрын
SHES SO BEAUTIFUL WHY DEMOLITION
@drewogenesthedog Жыл бұрын
Ask Mossad. They're good at skyscraper demolition.
@wongsubalai71927 ай бұрын
Urban Moving System 😂
@JC-er7je10 ай бұрын
😮. Looks very efficient and controlled. Good job NY.
@AMANiac. Жыл бұрын
What was the project cost??
@dummytummy9974 Жыл бұрын
What's the salvage cost and demolition cost ?
@7eis Жыл бұрын
Could've just called the CIA and cashed in on the insurance
@jobskinner83315 күн бұрын
Simply amazing. The logistics are staggering!
@StephenPalmore-u7j Жыл бұрын
One airplane 11 and a half minutes ...geeessss
@chadgrov Жыл бұрын
But wait all those 9/11 wish version of Alex Jones’ses?!
@bartman898 Жыл бұрын
turn it into a homeless camp. they would have destroyed it in 6 wks.
@keithcollins3284 Жыл бұрын
Worked at 270 from 10/2010 to 11/2011… had a cool lobby…
@BrettELothrop Жыл бұрын
Why was this building no longer desirable?
@PeruvianPotato11 ай бұрын
@@BrettELothropIt was 60 years old by the time of demolition. Plus, it kinda looks pretty boring ngl
@milospajic432Ай бұрын
🛩️🏢✅. (Fast). (Cheap) 🏗️🏢❌. (Slow).(expensive)
@stuartwiner7920 Жыл бұрын
It's surprising that they couldn't rehab it profitably. The exterior looks OK.
@RaysGuide Жыл бұрын
Those words asbestos and lead paint I think are the story there.
@aaronhuffman48525 ай бұрын
@@RaysGuidesales pitch!
@Bye_All_Means Жыл бұрын
Probably 25x more expensive than just blowing it up
@RayEttler11 ай бұрын
is there something like godwins law in conjunction w 9-11? if so it can be admired tight here.
@mjg687410 ай бұрын
Probably cost 3-5 times as much as a demolition by dynamite..but seems a little tight to try that without expensive containment so I wonder how all the other old towers are gonna be demolished if it costs so bloody much. Maybe revamping the structure and renos weren’t feasible?
@NoOneAM2 Жыл бұрын
were there any 5 dancing _____ to document the event?
@NoOneAM2 Жыл бұрын
did the ______ who were around the tower get a message through an app hours before about demolishion?
@markcampbell757711 ай бұрын
Actual good work. WOW.
@Casca-su3ty Жыл бұрын
Why was it demolished if the building was actually new
@PeruvianPotato11 ай бұрын
60 years old = New Give me a break.
@scronx10 ай бұрын
thanks for some great news! Do you mean volunteer or voluntary?
@sneedfeed3179 Жыл бұрын
I love stuff like this.
@GaryMcNeil-hv9zx Жыл бұрын
Sure buddy whose apartment was next door with the window open appreciated all the lead particles floating into his cereal in the morning.
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
Better than imploding the damn thing.
@BrunoMontanhez Жыл бұрын
You all making jokes about 9/11 being the biggest controlled demolition miss the point that maybe this video was made before 2001. Am'right?😅
@nickv1008 Жыл бұрын
Was it pre 911?
@oSTYNCLSYo Жыл бұрын
False, 9/11.
@gordondeitz7838 Жыл бұрын
twin towers. still pissed
@theyy_hatecj9992 ай бұрын
oh just 2 american airlines
@Siv__Cho2 ай бұрын
I know it takes one plane 💀
@cosmojetz20002 ай бұрын
So what you're saying is that the original plan for demolition 20 years earlier had bad gps coordinates?
@ElwoodBluesAK Жыл бұрын
One year lol Bush did it in 12 minutes.
@michaelodendaal577615 күн бұрын
Price tag?
@carloskissoondhan9641 Жыл бұрын
Bullocks!! Nothing beats September 11 brah. 😜😜✌🏾
@42luke93 Жыл бұрын
That’s terrible There are so many other crumbling buildings and this one looked nice.
@lanebrady9810 Жыл бұрын
Much better than wiring a few buildings with thermite - flying some planes into them and then setting off the explosion with thousands of people still inside the buildings.
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
@lanebrady9810 man doesn't understand what jet fuel is
@lanebrady9810Күн бұрын
@@archimetropolis jet fuel is a highly combustible liquid that DOES NOT BURN GIRLS VERY LONG NOR KEEP ITS ORIGINAL HEAT
@dennisfitch7791 Жыл бұрын
could have done it in just a couple hrs just ask the USA government
@h8GW9 ай бұрын
Conspiracy theorists with extreme evidence bias are gross
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
THIS
@johntinus9068 Жыл бұрын
What is a voluntary demolition?
@charlesdoran5829 Жыл бұрын
What's up. Why we don't get the rest of the video???
@RayEttler11 ай бұрын
the "most eco friendly demolition" is no demolition
@cheekyswildlife4983 Жыл бұрын
Ask the US government
@lyfandeth Жыл бұрын
When was this?
@MabrysDad Жыл бұрын
Just got to fly a plane into it.
@MarkMclaughlin-qm8kq Жыл бұрын
Interesting did u know engineers in sf have found way to straightened leaning building they are gonna use water to straightened then high strength concrete to stabilize brand new technology power of water
@jnaveen6317 Жыл бұрын
How to get job in this field
@TSquared200111 ай бұрын
Priestly Demolition is probably blushing
@themagnificentche111927 күн бұрын
That’s very impressive the demolition crew must have been paid a handsome fee for that! Imagine how much copper, steel and aluminium would have been “weighed in” 😂😂
@corners3755 Жыл бұрын
Sure, it might have been eco in the sense you recycled a lot. But i bet this was one of the most expensive demolition projects in the history per floor. Since each floor had to be dismantled literally by hand floor by floor.
@SD-vy7gj5 ай бұрын
All metal is recycled. Always has been.
@kulturfreund6631 Жыл бұрын
What a cool building. Why was it demolished? It’s a pity. How many of New York‘s skyscrapers have been taken down over time?
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
It was outdated and a building twice as large is filling the spot.
@nickajk1 Жыл бұрын
They brought the third building down in less than a day
@pattidrier9593 Жыл бұрын
I am so glad to hear they recycled so much of the building. As it should be!!
@miggzzz Жыл бұрын
See “9/11”
@DOCTORJAN714 Жыл бұрын
And what did this demolition cost?
@daal77679 ай бұрын
The previous record holder was building 7
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
nah
@davidempire4874 Жыл бұрын
It would've made more sense to demolish it Twin Towers-style
@krisgonynor6895 күн бұрын
How do you recycle asbestos? Recycling it into what, exact;y?
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
The asbestos most likely wasn't recycled
@kie-skatemods4141 Жыл бұрын
What does it take to take down old buildings in New York? Geez I don’t know, 9-11 maybe
@kie-skatemods4141 Жыл бұрын
😂😅
@guyjoslin7682 Жыл бұрын
How much did it cost?
@BubbleyGorl10 ай бұрын
I thought it was the Deutsch Bank building?
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
Nope, this is a different building, though they were demolished the same way
@marcy3098 Жыл бұрын
Unbuilders! Game changing construction
@muwahid5022 Жыл бұрын
Ask the bush family
@YourAviatoRR Жыл бұрын
I think they tried this in 2001
@george2113 Жыл бұрын
Why was the building demolished?
@archimetropolis3 күн бұрын
It was outdated and a building twice as large is filling the spot
@xMikeDezzyx421 Жыл бұрын
I knew these comments were going to be entertaining
@PeruvianPotato11 ай бұрын
Nah, just NPCs parroting each other because they're about as original as Amy Schumer
@leob440311 ай бұрын
@@PeruvianPotatoyou're the NPC
@PeruvianPotato11 ай бұрын
@@leob4403 Care to elaborate? I'm one of the few saying something genuinely new.
@leob440311 ай бұрын
@@PeruvianPotato wait what are you saying that is genuinely new?
@PeruvianPotato9 ай бұрын
@@leob4403For one, not being a parrot and repeating the same jokes like a retarbeb walrus
@angelopalmieri434 Жыл бұрын
The largest voluntary demolition was tower 1 & 2 of the original wtc and the cost was many innocent lives plus a war we were never meant to fight.
@somewhatinformed1208 Жыл бұрын
we funded this war over a hundred billion dollars so we could sell them our fracking gas.
@rubencohen2936 Жыл бұрын
You just scratch the surface of the Deep State. A new independent professional investigation needs to take place on what really happened on September 11th, 2001. None of the physics adds up that morning. The Pentagon is obvious that no Boeing aircraft disappeared into the structure.
@StarstruckChiroMusic Жыл бұрын
That was a terrorist attack
@angelopalmieri434 Жыл бұрын
@@StarstruckChiroMusic *controlled demolition*
@StarstruckChiroMusic Жыл бұрын
@@angelopalmieri434 Quit lying, the collapse is so easy to explain too