The WORST Battlefield 6 Article Ever Written (I'm Speechless...)

[@ThatTonyFella]

All the of people who made Battlefield fun to play in the past have left DICE. This game is DoA.

[@M107Gaming]

Sigh...

[@cooldloop2381]

Devs come and go all the time, I think EA and Dice understand what we want now. I doubt they will give us exactly what we want but they will try to fix what went wrong. If they don’t the game will be dead on arrival but I doubt EA as a billion dollar company wants to lose their main fps title. But again it’s EA so they could.

[@M107Gaming]

@@cooldloop2381 They sure as hell could buddy!

[@BiG__Disgruntled]

Honestly, they could copy 90% of BF4s weapons, and add 15 new ones and it would be perfect.

[@M107Gaming]

@@BiG__Disgruntled I agree

[@xkinsey3831]

I feel like they have never played a BF game before. Do they not realise the gameplay is class-based? In BF4 there were 10 or 11 ish different categories of weapons, what we might expect if this one is going to be a modern setting as well. Imagine each class only being limited to like 3 guns. Not only would it be extremely boring, there would literally be no progression system, there'd be nothing to unlock. I am convinced it was written by someone who hasn't played before and thinks Battlefield is a hero shooter.

[@M107Gaming]

The inexperience is screaming loud. He definitely has a twisted perception of Battlefield games!

[@engineermerasmus2810]

I'd be really surprised if 6 is good, V and 2042 were insanly larger disapointments after the quality level of BF 1, why not just give a crossplay DLC to BF1, so I could play a good battlefield game with my friends on console...

[@M107Gaming]

well, they're not gonna be making that much money that way. we're talking about EA you know?

[@BiG__Disgruntled]

Maps maps maps. Winning battlefields recipe is simple to copy. 10 maps at launch, one month later another map or two. (Usually nostalgia remakes) By Christmas we need 12 maps. Each subsequent DLC needs 3 maps. After the first year, 18 -22 maps. These maps need full destruction. Running engineer was the greatest not only because you could take on vehicles by yourself but you could RPG a hole in a wall when your squad needed cover, or blow up a snipers window when he had you pinned down.

[@M107Gaming]

@@BiG__Disgruntled 👍

[@OPTIMUMELITE]

They don't know Battlfield like that 15 guns is crazy thatcehat 2042vl basically did. 35-40 at launch tbh.

[@M107Gaming]

Yeah, 15 is just a joke

[@armandassante5928]

Flashback of us playing C. S. 1.6 with 3 weapons.

[@M107Gaming]

@@armandassante5928 lol

[@ChampyOnPC]

I mean it did have a decent amount of guns, but its true that only like 3-4 were actually used (AK,M4,AWP,Deagle)

[@Frankenvergil]

I really hope they don't listen to that crap, the guy doesn't have a clue 🤣 P.s massive respect to your gameplay, mad skills! :)

[@M107Gaming]

Appreciate it buddy. I've got a really critical issue with my GPU, might not be obvious in the videos but the game runs like crap, with constant FPS drops and stutters. Makes it really hard to play...

[@Frankenvergil]

@M107Gaming the optimization of the isn't good, that doesn't help at all 😅

[@M107Gaming]

@Frankenvergil lol

[@OfKingsXI]

Respectfully good sir, if youre "P"s are popping in the mic you gotta back it up some, it kills the audio

[@M107Gaming]

Yeah I get it. Sorry for the inconvenience. The mic was alright, always used this one, even the distance seemed OK, but for some reason, this happened...

[@الداعية-22]

I wouldn't be surprised if dice ignores all their fans and decide to listen to this dude.

[@M107Gaming]

lmao

[@thebigsam]

How can 2042 have unique weapons, but lack variety? I must understand this word differently, but unique weapons are literally the basis of variety in the game. Bloat isn't, well balanced roster is. And just so I am clear, 15 weapons on launch is a joke. Like, you need at least 30 (±2) to cover most basic archetypes in each category

[@thebigsam]

Also, regarding other points in the video Nobody ever said they are completely distancing themselves from 128p idea. I am not saying that it will be in the next game, but nobody said that next game is 64p only. I personally believe we will see some 128p version of gamemodes in some form. Maybe in Portal if they actually decide to continue developing it. Henderson said there will 35+ guns on launch. Don't believe him, he doesn't have the best record with EA leaks. BF6 wasn't delayed. The development had a soft restart in 2022, but there were no deadlines back then. New game will have a normal (relatively) development cycle for BF game. Don't start overhyping it being "a year late from schedule" as "it had an extra year" BF4's weapon roster is a bloated mess where 90% of guns in each category literally feel identical. BF3 has around 70 weapons and its weapon selection is far better

[@M107Gaming]

👍

[@M107Gaming]

Tom said we're gonna have *45 weapons at launch Yes, nobody said we're gonna go completely away from 128p, but the way these guys did it in 2042, i doubt they can pull off anything better in terms of server and general game optimization and i believe they know that pretty well. So the better guess is that 128p is not considered. There were no deadlines for bf6, correct. The thing is, 2042 hasn't got content in quite some time, i believe something like 6-7 months if we consider HAVEN the last real content. This will continue to be the case in 2025. When your live service game isn't live service anymore, you're supposed to replace it with another one, simple as that. With all the issues that BF4 had back in the day, it took them 3 years to release BF1 which literally had one of the best if not the best launch of a Battlefield game!

[@np2869]

The kind of person who wrote that 'article' is the one the devs and management take as gospel. Not the players. They believe that this is the target audience.

[@M107Gaming]

@@np2869 This is so stupid even EA knows it lmao

[@slyice3551]

USa needs 30+ guns, Russia needs 30+ guns, 20+ veichles

[@M107Gaming]

That's not gonna be balanced. 10 russian weapons might so for the beginning. The rest should be distributed between the US and the rest of the EU! Some can even be from middle east (Israeli ACE Galil for example! )

[@imjeffbuchanan]

Battlefield 6 will have more than 15 weapons, if they're smart. Dude who wrote article is delusional. I think if Dice knows their core/long time audience, they will include not only a wide variety of weapons, but also a more expansive weapon modding system (similar to Escape From Tarkov).

[@M107Gaming]

I doubt they go anywhere near tarkov though!

[@Merty1388]

Issue with modern shooters isn't the amounts of weapons they have, issue is the gunsmith systems. There is no need to use a high TTK/low recoil weapon in games like BO6 or Delta Force or Tarkov because you can just turn low TTK/high recoil weapon into a recoilless laser beam in gunsmith, not even just recoil but you also can give every weapon 50 round drum mags, there is no reason to use weapons like P90 or Bizon in games with gunsmith because you can just slap on a 50 round drum to every other weapon. There is a reason why millions of people watch those ''no recoil assault rifle setup'' videos for games like Delta Force or Call of Duty, everyone copies the same ''meta'' weapon build and everyone uses the same guns. BF6 or BF 2025 should just NOT use a generic gunsmith system and weapons will naturally start to feel unique. They should keep plus system of 2042 for BF6 but instead of mags they should have an ''accessory'' segment just like BF3 and BF4 imo. Mag sizes should be fixed unless it's also another ''accessory'' for select few weapons. I dislike how every weapon has 30 different mags in 2042. Removing that and adding ''accessory'' option would be far better imo. Gunsmith also makes base weapons exceptionally bad, they want you to grind 50 attachments for the same weapon just so it can feel good which is something I don't like, base weapon should be good right from the start instead of artificially making it bad with lots of idle swap, lots of clunkiness etc.

[@M107Gaming]

Couldn't agree more

[@trashaimgamer7822]

The problem isn't the gunsmith, it's the balancing.

[@Merty1388]

​@@trashaimgamer7822 Gunsmithing creates that problem though. MWII was a balancing mess because a single red dot gave you ADS penalty, sprint to fire penalty, moving speed penalty etc. Delta Force is a huge mess because you can create no recoil hitscan weapons in gunsmith. And there is BO6 which is just okay but makes you wonder why you need gunsmith in a game like that since every attachment is so incremental, you won't notice a huge change unless you use gunfighter and equip 8 attachments instead of 5. Just make that 5 attachment setup base stats of the weapon itself and give option to add 2 maybe 3 attachments(ehem.. pick 10 system). It just artificially makes base guns bad on purpose and gives you a false sense of progression. BF4 still has the best customization in militaristic shooters to this day because of that imo. You couldn't just turn a high recoil weapon into a laser beam unlike in the gunsmith games, if you wanted high RPM low TTK weapons you had to learn the recoil control or burst firing. BF6 should just follow BF4's attachment system combined with plus system. I mean just look at most popular militaristic shooter currently, CS2. No one asks for gunsmithing or 30 different attachments for a single AK. Because people are aware making AK a no recoil weapon with 50 round drum mag would break the game.

[@LapinM40a3]

We’re fucked if they start to do like call of duty, yahhh season 1 you’ll have this one and this. Nah bro, we don’t want a game half released. They had 3 years of development like I feel they became lazy asf.

[@M107Gaming]

Correct

[@nilsggr]

That whole article sounds like it was written by a badly prompted AI

[@M107Gaming]

lmao

[@dt9233]

Sounds like some still trying to get the views or stir up toxicity..... Battlefield 2042 was still nice. I still enjoy it. Be cautious there are very toxic people trying to mess up gaming period and that shouldn't be accepted. That guy has been sleeping under a rock... I agree with you.

[@M107Gaming]

Ofc i'm trying to get views too. What do you think people do when they start a youtube channel? Lol And no 2042 wasn't still nice. 2042 is literally one of the worst Battlefield games if not the worst. Let's just accept the fact. I enjoy playing it, but that doesn't mean it's a nice game. I guess we all agree that the author was sleeping under some giant boulder though!

[@dt9233]

@@M107Gaming Get your views... My opinion, still a great and fun game to play. I love the game and now I am waiting on the new battlefield "BATTLEFIELD NEW UNREAL ENGINE TEASER" kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIuZh4Kbe753edUsi=wAhp6ACp3etpBEhY

[@M107Gaming]

@@dt9233 👍

[@DigitalinDaniel]

Bad Company 2 Vietnam only had 15 guns and it was amazing...

[@M107Gaming]

Dude, that was an expansion, not a standalone game! It's like calling BF4: Final Stand an independent game!

[@DigitalinDaniel]

@@M107Gaming Okay? It was a standalone expansion completely separate from the main title, none of the content affected Bad Company 2... But we can just go with Battlefield 1943 which only had half as many guns and was also extremely fun. I don't think it should be that low, maybe a similar system to 1943 but like each faction gets 2 primary per class and 2 all-kit sidearms... (10 guns total per faction) so 20 guns by default and adding a new faction adds +10...

[@M107Gaming]

@@DigitalinDaniel I get it but the only thing I don't get is why? I mean if it's about the fun factor, BF3 was also fun with +70 guns, BF4 was fun with +100 guns. What's gonna be the catch if they only start with let's say 20 guns?

[@DigitalinDaniel]

@@M107Gaming You don't have to have a bunch of modelers, sound designers, and whatever else wasting time on weapons that feel and function relatively the same? You look at games like BF3/BF4 that had the illusion of a bunch of weapons, LMGs for example you had the 25 damage LMGs and the slower 34 damage LMGs... they all had the same copy/paste attachments, 100 rounds or 200 with "extended mags", they are all between 600-800rpm, you have functionally 2 weapons pretending to be 15? They honestly could have just had the M249 and M240 for Americans, and the RPK and PKP for Russians and really focus on making those few weapons feel as perfect as possible. (Err I think the M27 is the in-game mirror of the RPK, and was technically suppose to be the replacement for the M249 irl) Not to mention when you get stuff like swapping ammo/damage in BF2042, in addition to blanket attachments, it makes the guns feel even more saturated.

[@M107Gaming]

@@DigitalinDaniel 👍

[@The_Post-It-Note]

I think it’s been confirmed that there will be 45 weapons on launch

[@M107Gaming]

Not confirmed, but tom henderson from insider gaming first said it was a leak. His leaks are often accurate though!

[@The_Post-It-Note]

@ sorry that’s what I meant. It’s a solid start down the road of improvement. This boosts my confidence a bit more now

[@M107Gaming]

@@The_Post-It-Note Yeah that's a great start

[@MOIST_FLAPS]

Yeah, stop catering to children and cater to the OGs who helped make BF great. Pretty clear the old ones were better than the newest version

[@M107Gaming]

[@whatmattrsmost]

My all time favorite still and always will be bf2. Simple and fun

[@M107Gaming]

👍

[@somehalonerd1176]

Typical game rant imcopetence

[@M107Gaming]

👍

[@crayab]

I don't think a less is more approach on wespons is a bad idea. It worked well for Titanfall and Quake. No point in having 15 different ARs when they all do the same thing

[@M107Gaming]

Well, those games are not big scale shooters, their player base is definitely not used to a whole variety of weapons (107 guns in BF4 for example). So you just can't compare them to Battlefield so easily. And also, there is no point in going less with guns. What's it gonna add to the game? There are different teams working on each part of the game, you can't just bring weapon designers over to work on the Single Player Campaign!

[@Secret_Pickle]

Jesus christ get a pop filter.

[@M107Gaming]

@@Secret_Pickle there was an issue with the mic. Won't happen again

[@dawidr6559]

Great vid

[@M107Gaming]

Thanks buddy!

[@mattm7007]

Take the mic out of your mouth.

[@M107Gaming]

@@mattm7007 it was actually far away lol. It was the mic, won't happen again