The Next Battlefield Is Taking A Gamble

[@noverrr4508]

The main thing that modern shooters lack is grit and seriousness. Yes we are all playing these games for fun but when you have ridiculously cheesy, unrealistic, bright, colourful player models/skins, the games immersion is completely destroyed. Skins are great as they give you a roadmap of progression (if they are no paid, but earnt) and they give you character individuality. For paid skins, it gives the studios feedback/ more funding to keep renewing and updating the game. The key is to meet in the middle. Remove battle passes and bring in skins that fit within the world that don't make you look too out of place or ridiculous. Its more than evident that the lack of ambition and gamble in modern COD games is what is killing the franchise. There is a reason BF3/4 are so fondly remembered. Do not let this happen to battlefield.

[@Wolfpunkz]

i hate the never ending sniper glint, i wish instead of constantly being on it turns off after a second of you seeing it. that way the enemy has enough time to react and you have enough time to shoot.

[@glenn6284]

Ah the cancerous battlepass

[@NYG5]

Played one match of BF2024, saw the cringe "heroes" and uninstalled. They were a blight in BFV and ruined BF1's respect of the source material, but at least they didn't take over the whole game. It's disgusting to have the stupid dancing and the cringe one liners. It's also the same reason why I never played Siege when I played all the other R6 games, why would I want to play a game where I'm locked into one abrasive character when before I had total customization?

[@Blueesteel_]

1000000% agree

[@jocobibradshaw1327]

@@Wolfpunkzjust don’t stare down the scope the whole time they can only see glint while you looking down the scope or use a lower power scope with no glint

[@maxwelladams6023]

I honestly am just sick of battle pass and shops having weird skins and very overpriced skins on an already 70$ game I really hope they can find a way to make it better

[@claudio6572]

Im sorry, but this is the new wave, weather you like it or not you have to accept it, and look at the good side of it: new maps and new weapons are free

[@RyneLanders]

​@@claudio6572Unless you are FLAT OUT BROKE you're getting screwed. There is a cost for "free" and that cost is the loss of maps, weapons, skins, etc. and all done at a HIGH quality that we used to get. The math is very simple. Look at the count and delivery pace of new maps, game modes, and vehicles in the Battlefield 2, 3, and 4 expansion packs. Then look at the same stats for Battlefield 2042's "free" bullshit. It's less than a quarter the count of those.

[@claudio6572]

@@RyneLanders ok

[@RyneLanders]

@@claudio6572 show me the lie. How many new maps did 2042 put out? How fast was that? Battlefield 3 had 5 expansions with 20 new maps (some of the best the franchise has ever seen), numerous new gameplay modes, a bunch of new vehicles and weapons, and skins. And the expansions were on sale constantly so you could pick them up cheap.

[@gamerf1141]

​@@RyneLandersif your broke you won't be able to buy premium either so in away your kind of screwed both ways

[@mathissveistrup3575]

DO NOT PREORDER!

[@sneedler5993]

Never again... Last time I got burned was 2017 battlefront 2

[@chlorhexidine2506]

like farming

[@ImBored8141]

Made that mistake with 2042, never again

[@CasvalSVER]

@@ImBored8141 Dude them not letting me refund still pisses me off to this day. lol

[@aiden8834]

@@ImBored8141Fr💀 My first ever pre-order too🤣 I should've known from the BETA

[@SirCap.2]

I'm still mad that BFV didn't get a Eastern front expansion

[@iamgamernoob4121]

Be happy u at least got a Mosin-gernade launcher. We didn't get a proper navy or Italians.😢

[@you.knowit]

bfv was an expansion its self

[@Linked_Ahead]

Bfv was made with PC in mind first unfortunately. The UI, the controls, everything literally felt off. Aiming was crap. Sigh.

[@Sonny-zr9jg]

I'd still buy it if it came out now

[@tankdempsey558]

BfV was getting good when the pacific hit

[@undefinedundefined8775]

DO NOT PREORDER

[@commanderguardian7292]

PLEASE DICE… DONT MESS THIS UP!!!

[@TheAutisticKiwi]

Dice may not be saints, but the people who are responsible for most of the bullshit in recent battlefied titles are EA

[@commanderguardian7292]

Fair point, I’m just tired of the constant failure. For me it started with Star Wars battlefront 2015 and it’s just been fail after failure.

[@DevilsRockContract]

They already messed this, did you noticed AI art, ffs.

[@kamkam4484]

They will

[@1Orderchaos]

People said the same for 2042

[@ToiletGrenade]

As much as I want to be excited for the next Battlefield, I can't not let Andrew Wilson's "tremendous live service" comment linger in my head, and the marketing starting with the Black Ops 6 strategy of "Hey remember these dumb changes that never should have happened? We undid them!" Isn't something we should be praising as highly as people are, congratulations, you did something that shouldn't have even needed to be done if you'd actually understood the assignment at hand. The bit with them saying the game will have double the weapons of BF2042 is a hilariously low bar too, ~45 weapons at launch is still about half of what Battlefield 4 launched with over a decade ago (83). I really want to be excited, but I can't get excited knowing these things.

[@Learn_The_Cube]

I would listen to a 30 minute video about the cosmonaut’s opinions on different types of sedimentary rocks

[@CoffeeNSmokes76]

Get rid of "games as a service". Bring back privately owned servers. Put out a finished product on day one with at least ten maps. Every couple of months, put out DLC with 3 to 4 maps, mew weapons, new vehicles. If you can't afford DLC on release day, wait for a sale

[@eamonncowan2839]

DLC? Paid servers? What happened to free updates? Why do you want to pay for extra content? If they have been doing this for years, then it doesn't seem like the greed changed much. Just changed shape

[@The.flower.club.pmc17]

Because we got content, the amount of stuff that got added to 2042 in it's entire lifetime is less than 1 dlc for bf4..​@@eamonncowan2839

[@ponraul1221]

Yup, it’s not a service, it’s a scam. Just and excuse to drip feed a fraction of the content of paid DLCs and charging goofy ass skins for the price we paid for full DLCs with 3-4 maps and several weapons. If it provided better value these greedy corporations wouldn’t have ALL switched to it

[@samuraisurge]

Yes! DICE, Adults can pay for a better game with more content. Free to play a games as a service suck

[@eamonncowan2839]

​@@samuraisurge I do agree that free live service games suck, but I just never agreed with paid dlc. Especially for a game I'm paying upwards of 70 euros for

[@moritzrossbroich]

I love the fact that the community has come to the consensus that Battlefield 4.5 is a fitting term for our dream game. It's pretty much exactly what we and the franchise need to happen for Battlefield to not die

[@Operator_gloomy]

Battlefield 3.5 fr fr

[@Zeethos]

No, just you always online losers want that. The majority of people want the game to evolve and grow, not stagnate on gameplay from 10+ years ago. Also the battlefield “community” should be the last people listened to, nothing but the biggest crybabies exist with there. Go outside touch grass and stop crying about video games

[@tyleranderson530]

Give me the best parts of 4 and 1. One of those parts HAS to be the BF1 headshot sound. Loved it.

[@a.j.6832]

man... they said the same for 2042. Right now gaming is such a bad space with live service crap, battlepasses, etc. Better wait until this comes out before even being excited. Let them earn their customers back

[@Domaty]

i swear to god people better not start getting hyped over the next battlefield omfg lol. but then again im sure once dice drops le epic nostalgia bait trailer you people are going to buy this garbage wholesale. do not preorder.

[@heatgamer7008]

10000000000% this a nostalgic trailer hyped up le epic is the first thing we fall for.

[@HeadHunter697]

Not gonna fall for it again

[@kamkam4484]

People forget, people don't learn

[@capitancoolness942]

Be quiet reditor

[@Dorian_Kellum]

A war between NATO and a Mercenary company. Even though it’s a leak, I kinda hope it’s true as that could mean we get more than just American and Russian equipment to play with. Maybe even different vehicles depending on where the map is set.

[@chlorhexidine2506]

so basically amerimutts vs wagner/dogwater pmc?

[@trainenthusiast5199]

⁠@@chlorhexidine2506 or russimutts vs pmc.

[@abrahamgn3614]

​@chlorhexidine2506 u have an inferiority complex, as most of the world does with the U.S.A

[@NYG5]

US was EU, EU vs RU, RU vs CN, CN vs US maps. The only way I see Europe actually paying for a military is if they break away from the USD and SWFT hegemony, and it just makes a novel concept, like Tom Clancy's EndWar

[@Dorian_Kellum]

@@NYG5 EndWar is almost exactly what I was expecting from this, setting wise. The deal might be a group of mercenaries funded by Russia and China, but they take on an anti-superpower cause instead of just an anti-western one. Might draw in more nations and bodies that way for them to actually have the ability to take on NATO in open warfare. BF2 also had EU in a dlc with a couple maps fighting China and MEC.

[@sensei4042]

Remember, no preorders.

[@CNM3]

Oh my some words!!! Don't forget Portal was a love letter to BF Fans and remember how it died almost immediately?

[@neerajoshi5473]

Remember, no pre-order

[@funny-gv3ml]

No one going to talk about how they use ai for there showcase

[@thecosmonaut4221]

Wait wha

[@funny-gv3ml]

@@thecosmonaut4221 You didn’t know that ea was using ai for there showcase?

[@thecosmonaut4221]

@@funny-gv3ml oh I thought you meant the concept art was Ai generated

[@Swaguley]

​@@thecosmonaut4221 it was

[@thecosmonaut4221]

@@Swaguleyholy shit you’re right

[@BrickReporter]

This before another Lego video is crazy

[@thecosmonaut4221]

Blame EA for dropping news on a random Monday

[@seanloftus5950]

​@@thecosmonaut4221Blame EA for ending Battlefront II's live service 😭

[@soft_cawfee908]

we MIGHT be back bros

[@rufinopascual5390]

"DO NOT PREORDER" seems to be the new slogan for the new Battlefield lol

[@massiverabbit3454]

There is a reason why spend around 600 hours of bf1, go back to that formula

[@WeedShaggy]

BF1's immersion and it's special classes (sentries and flame troopers) were amazing

[@BL_762]

What do you play on? I tried playing on Xbox and it was impossible to find a game.

[@jocobibradshaw1327]

@@BL_762 use server browser and check filters refresh

[@Texasmule]

​@@BL_762 on PlayStation I find games on most battlefields

[@massiverabbit3454]

@@BL_762 ps4 lol and i always have a match on

If the game passes the smell test, I shall be a medic that supports my squad ASAP!

[@MultiSlawa]

Please no more hero characters and stupid skins I can’t take it anymore

[@RoiDeCoeurs]

I don't know how you managed to make a well edited, well researched video with interesting thoughts in such a short period of time, but you did it, great job !

[@thecosmonaut4221]

Since the initial reveal I’ve gotten probably 12 accumulative hours of sleep

[@RoiDeCoeurs]

@@thecosmonaut4221 ahah

[@imnotusingmyrealname4566]

The first red flag is the global setting. The best Battlefield campaigns all had a connection between their locations other than "the plot happens here". NATO vs a PMC? Yikes.

[@TheKhakikid]

I mean, considering groups like Wagner exist and operate on a global scale means that they aren’t too far off. Russia uses Wagner to take care of shit that the government can distance themselves from. Take with that what you will.

[@brianmola711]

I’m cautiously optimistic now which is a miracle because I wasn’t even looking forward to this game at all originally. Reason being is that Vince Zampella is attached to the project. He’s a big name in the FPS scene so it gives me some hope it’ll be good. Regardless, don’t pre-order and don’t take the reveal trailer as what the gameplay will be like.

[@geplayer]

Personally one of the biggest problems with modern shooters is that Devs focus on the competitive scene, with all these metas for guns, attachments and perks. I just want to come home and play, not study a 50 page web article on what perks or attachments give me that 0.01% advantage. I'd be happy with the Battlefield 2 style, where there was no advantages with perks or attachments, it was only based on your personal skill with a chosen weapon.

[@thecosmonaut4221]

This guy gets it

[@DeltaDgtlAnimation]

Yeah I was fine with the respective default service rifles we got in BF2 lol.

[@MrBlazzin101]

Before any of yall think about pre orders or even buying day 1. Remember that " love letter to fans" which was a spit in the face to all of us.

[@heatgamer7008]

Definitely not falling for it after the failure of 2042. I’ve learned my lesson after getting hyped for 2042 trailer. They gonna put 80% of their money on the marketing and 20% on the actual development. I’m gonna wait for review and full release if it’s a flop then Rip battlefield for the third time. If it’s an actual Giga Chad and classic masterpiece I’ll be fainting on the cheese floor. Anyways nice vid ;)

[@adieraditz]

Simple, bring back class system and thats it..... Specialist bored as hell

[@heatgamer7008]

@@adieraditz if they pull out a Battlefield bad company or 3 on us I’ll DEFINITELY faint on that cheese floor fr.

[@adieraditz]

@@heatgamer7008 bad company isn't that bad, except single player

[@heatgamer7008]

@@adieraditz I’ll be selling my soul for an other bad company campaign

[@PBI45]

At least they've not been developing during covid, which had a huge impact on 2042s botched release. As in, 2020 was the year of the hero shooter/operator shooter, so they changed it to that from a gritty BF4-but-set-in-the-future style game (as you can see in the early early concept art). This time, there's no excuse.

[@morsecode980]

Remember: all the good senior DICE devs left over the span of the mid-2010’s to the early 2020’s, a lot of them to make their own studio called Embark, which created Arc Raiders and The Finals. This WILL NOT be like the old days. At best, it’ll be a ripoff of the CoD MW reboots. I’m calling it now.

[@gabbyprincip1575]

I'll be a bit disappointed if the conflict ends up being is nato vs a made up faction. I guess having russia, iran and china as the opposition is still a no go. But well we won't really know until we actually see what the game will be about

[@funny-gv3ml]

Wasn't it "leak" a few years back of it just being u.s. and nato vs some random pmc group

[@Lornext]

I dont want to see a single "PMC faction"... Those are so boring.

[@TheyTalkOnline]

Yes two armies going head to head is good. Although it should not been some "PMCs" or terrorist etc. It needs to be clear, real world countries just like earlier. Russia vs. NATO, China vs. USA in Pacific etc. PMCs could be DLC like awesome "Special Forces" was with legendary Battlefield 2. No fantasy pkease but real life countries in fictional modern conflict.

[@ponraul1221]

There should be PMC factions in some maps like there was ANZAC factions on a few BF1 maps. But they should be fighting for specific nations like irl

[@Skiivin]

I’m so glad that Zampella is taking the helm of battlefield. Just look at his track record- Modern Warfare, Titanfall, Apex Legends. Guy is a titan of the industry and I think BF6 is gonna be a classic

[@FunkyCryptid]

What's that kratos quote? "Keep your expectations low and you shall never be dissapointed, boy"

[@G7ue]

If the reveal has that dramatic techy Battlefield title card, similar to the BF3 era, and/or similar UI design to that era, then I will officially start getting excited.

[@GabrielMartinez-sd8pc]

All DICE needs to do….nameless and faceless soldiers like BF3 and BF4. And they’ll be fine. Stop putting weird Fortnite skins and Starbucks baristas as classes.

[@el_de_enmedio]

I wish they would add as many armies as in BF1, but nowadays they don't even have the guts to add China, probably not even Rusia. They will make the US fight some "evil mercenary group," and they'll add horrible skins like COD or even bring back the operators. Live service and no DLCs.

[@Shaarpest]

Going back to what players have been vocal about wanting for years is anything but a gamble

[@deiongoldsmith515]

I just hope the factions are US, EU NATO, RUSSIA, China. and maybe Japan jsdf?

[@Chronoverse1999]

Why does every shooter game has to have a friggin Battleroyale nowadays? Like stop with this trend chasing, It's very tiring.

[@tktxlegend4540]

I'm not gonna preorder, but I will say that I have faith in Vince Zampella's leadership. He has a great portfolio of games under his name and I have a feeling EA handed him the reigns of Battlefield because they trusted him to get it back on track. Edit: Also, I think the title should reflect what they plan on doing with the series going forward. Do they want this game to last and continue to receive updates for years to come? Just call it Battlefield. Is this just gonna be an iteration that receives 2 years of updates before another Battlefield game launches and this game stops getting updates? Call it Battlefield 6. The title should reflect their intentions for the game and franchise as a whole in my opinion.

[@24Mansfield]

Don't get hyped... don't get hyped... don't get hyped... oh, no...

[@Echo4Papa]

This felt longer than it was. Great breakdown and explanation of what we want. This is just my opinion, but BF3 had something that BF4 didn’t have. It was dirtier ,grimier, grittier, etc. BF3 was the greatest multiplayer game I’ve ever played.

[@Privat3Kag3]

V Still playing BF1 button

[@FoxFire128]

With Vince Zampella leading it, I'm feeling pretty good about it.

[@e-c-dia]

Dont get hyped yet! Just chill

[@bleakfurball5334]

Hope there lots of factions to play as,would be cool

[@ChampyOnPC]

They could make a WAR mode where every battle you win matters in a grander scale war. Just a grunt doing his duty...

[@vorpal2087]

That would be awesome. Then it could put some actual sense into how 2042 global catastrophe happened. I'm a story lore guy and the fact that 2042 completely abandoned the "plot" pissed me off.

[@Texasmule]

​@@vorpal2087I'm saying, I was really into seeing how it would turn out because I love near future earth predictions like cartels over taking governments, nations dissolving into factions/tribes/clans or massive nations arise out of thin air conquering the land

[@idancemyassintothepaint7571]

Isn't that a thing? Grand conquest or something!

[@idiopathictendencies8453]

Game development used to be about making a decent game that was fun and bug free. Now its about making a game that they can break into bits to sell piece mail and an experience that's just good enough to play and just bad enough to incentivise microtransactions.

[@idiopathictendencies8453]

Ye

[@aspen9102]

"We've been here before"

[@strikemanpop]

Do not preorder do not get a sponsor by them do not glorify before the full release DO NOT GIVE THEM HOPE

[@IndianaJones44]

Remember: do what ever the hell you want. Idc

[@Est3ban__M0rales]

Please Donald Trump Please Save me from another shitty Battlefield

[@josiahsawyer1105]

"If you want a different style of game, you wont even have to leave battlefield" "tremendous live service experience" "battle royal and/or extractions shooter". It's not looking good as much as I would like to be excited about it "returning to basics"

[@michaelmyers5782]

You need to stop hyping this up. It’s just concept art

[@feliputs]

"No one wants the game to fail at launch"... I want it.

[@BL_762]

Honestly kinda scared because if the game fails Battlefield will 100% die and we’ll probably never get another battlefield game.

[@soundclock2939]

Thus the honeymoon period begins

[@jayk3lly]

This is the most accurate statement ive seen in a while

[@StarchieHalo]

The first thing they can do is price it at 60$, there's no reason to have games be 70$

[@WwZa7]

EA has to look at Ubisoft and NOT FUCK THIS UP

[@boruta1034]

I already see a few red flags there 1) Multiple big developers working on one game. Can't DICE handle it alone, and if so, why? 2) Live service model was already mentioned in one interview. They can tell use all those beautiful things about BF3 and 4 being inspirations but we know how live service works. COD started actual soldiers and operators but ended up with clowns and celebrities. 3) NATO vs PMC, it already tells us that the game is going to be as boring as 2042, in terms of the setting. In 2042 it's literally a group of random dudes fighting eachother where in the next BF you will fight a faceless evil company. Come on, cowards, give us Russia and/or China. I'm honestly expecting to be disappointed again, because the era of simple and fun shooters seems to be simply gone. Everything has to be monetized to hell, with whacky skins and quirky characters.

[@FollowingStorm0]

Remember, soldiers: Do NOT preorder! Let's hope it lives up to our hopes and expectations once we've seen gameplay footage of the CTE. Personally, I hope it's like BF3 (sound, character callouts, atmosphere, advancement in graphics and map quality coupled with a mixture of various gameplay improvements, modern combat gadgets and vehicular variety made by BF4, with more modernized smooth animations and movement. Also, only 64 players sounds abit disappointing to me, as i feel like 80 players or 100 players could be a good sweet spot to fill up all vehicles and sense of scale to the battlefield; but if the map designs are as good as in BF3 then maybe i'll find it satisfactory. 64 player count felt like it was soooo next gen back in the days, but my dream has always been even more players. Albiet BF2042 taught us just how important good map design and scale is over sheer player count. This game is gonna make or break the future of this beloved franchise. I'm cautiously optimistic going forward.

[@DJNefarious447]

I know everyone is mad at a BR being most likely added but it's not DICE making it this time around. A different studio entirely dedicated to a free to play element of Battlefield can only benefit the franchise. Bring more players to the game and thus more money which gives the devs a bigger budget for new games.

[@jesswwuerthner2102]

They already had a br for bf 5

[@xtremea3165]

They could add a shop, battlepass, skins, etc. BUT leave away the meme, colourful and unrealistic skins to COD and Fortnite, and go with a militaristic skins theme. Seeing a colourful character entering is My Littlw Pony tank breaks immersion and ruins the experience. BF3-4 sold easily without all that and had character skins and vehicle skins reassembling real-life camo.

[@dawninn]

Exactly bro because if this game failed there's no more battlefield

[@nitroxylictv]

I really hope this game is current gen only so we can finally take advantage of the Series X and PS5 hardware. I wanna see this game running at 4k60 on my Series X.

[@RoachDoggJr2112]

TBH I want a battlefield set in a conflict that hasn't been covered by the series before. This includes modern/near future fictional conflicts. I'd love to see a Battlefield set sometime in the interwar period between WW2, the American Civil War, perhaps even a non-firearms based conflict like the crusades or something. But considering it IS a modern setting, it had BETTER be a proper milsim, not a COD clone. Even BF3/4 were COD clones IMO. Give me 128v128, realistic ballistics, logistics, 1 shot kills at 100 yards with an assault rifle, etc. Having a minimally destructive environment is not enough anymore. I realize I'm jaded, but I do not have faith that this game is going to be anything but absolute cheeks, with a battle royale mode and lootboxes galore. Also, get your eyes checked. 5:17 looks quite literally NOTHING like a Blackhawk. Not tryna be rude dude but glasses may be a requirement lol.

[@thecosmonaut4221]

4 hours of sleep made me see a black hawk

[@WeedShaggy]

A Korean War Era Battlefield would be interesting.

[@GodofToast]

What a world we live in People need to be reminded not to pre-order 💀

[@ryanjamesbaldock5370]

“I miss the idea of it”

[@prod.yvmu1]

why am I hyped by just looking at fucking concept art😭

[@insidersosa5250]

As excited as i am, dont pre-order. Lets wait and see

[@Spazmo]

I've fallen for false promises more often than I'd like to admit and have no hopes left for the next Battlefield game. Also, almost all of the Battlefield developers have left DICE. Maybe embark studios will make a game that's reminiscent of Battlefield, at least in terms of core mechanics. But I doubt it. It seems they don't want Battlefield be their only legacy.

[@nicolasboissiere]

People keep talking about how the 2042 trailer was great and how the game launch was a dissapointment. I'll tell you what's a good game trailer, the BF3 multiplayer reveal trailer. Why? It actually shows the game. Not some pre rendered ultra hype machine cinematic with tornadoes and explosions. Keep it simple ffs

[@TheKittyHenry95]

I hope it drops in spring ‘25. Don’t think it should try to compete with gta6

[@Homespun19]

5:01 to me the jets look like MIG-29s or SU-27 jets could be wrong though

[@thecosmonaut4221]

I can definitely see them being MIG-29s

[@ako_gare]

I wanna keep a positive outlook on what the game's gonna be, hopefully it's good and I trust Vince Zampella because of what he did on the early CoDs with Jason West plus what he's done with Respawn afterwards. But with Battlefield I'm gonna be weary of the next game, I'll probably get it eventually but I'll definitely won't pre-order anything.

[@battlefox8460]

I'm just hoping that they add more naval combat like they did with battlefield 1 with the player movement of battlefield 5 and of course destruction and leveloution

[@kingd2393]

I hope it brings back BF4 gaming system

[@Pixelatorist]

They said "Back to Basics" when BF5 was being developed. Don't shill out your money until the game and reviews are out

[@Texasmule]

Hope they keep the building and squad leader stuff from BFV

[@TheDustmeister88]

That picture gives me Karkand vibes. I like it.

[@DadbodZz]

Apparently it’s Gibraltar

[@aidanwj]

How people can even be excited for a dice game i will never know

[@gamerf1141]

same way people get excited by COD game

[@mesuper455]

They've made decent games at worst and peak at best. I might be a minority but i'm incredibly excited for this

[@not_hAck3r]

@@mesuper455 I was incredibly excited for bf2042. I preordered it for 90$ This is my biggest regret in video game history…

[@epic8923]

Extremely low quality standards. We're simply getting bf3/4 recycled and that's it. People are losing their minds over being able to replay games that have been out for 10+ years lol.

[@iammad8ro]

It'd be pretty cool if they took maps like Amiens from Battlefield 1 but modern day

[@Average-Illinoisan]

EA! DON'T MESS THIS UP!... AND MY LIFE!... IS YOURS!

[@DakotaofRaptors]

Hope it's more than just Russia vs US: getting rather tired of M1s vs T-90s, M4s vs AK-74s, etc...

[@asoftraiden]

Do not preorder! Scummy companies do it so that they can earn all the money and not have to finish the game into something great afterwards because no motivation which is because they already earned their money.

[@abracing199]

They said all of these things to the community for 2042... Do not trust a word they say.

[@TerbrugZondolop]

Preorder and if its crap, YOU are to blame.

[@Not_Laci]

The scoreboard is such a meme 😂

[@JohnJohnson-lk9vy]

I really hope a battle pass and skins dont ruin the feeling and aesthetic of the game. That's one thing I liked about battlefield 4 was each side having specific gear and soliders that gave them a certain look and character. Modern warfare 2019 was the first call of duty I really enjoyed in years but after a while they had the ramp the skins so people would buy them and it didnt take long until everyone was bright colors and shooting lazers. Dont even get me started on the other modern modern warfares.

[@K_Ri-mw4hr]

I've said it once and I'll say it again: All Battlefield needed to do was take BF1 and change the setting. And may be update the graphics in a decades time. But already, losing faith in this Battlefield. Tom Henderson has leaked that it's a NATO vs PMC story in modern day - and I hate this. the PMCs will run around looking like absolute goons, and wouldn't be surprised if it's used as a skin money cow.

[@Blueesteel_]

If they do not go exactly back to the gameplay of BF3/4 the franchise is done.

[@visiblehiggs130]

2042 was best sounding BF game yet but look how it ended up.

[@lostchee-lj7ie]

It’s not taking a gamble… People like the older games.

[@gerrysmith5597]

They say BACK TO ITS CORE!!! WHY KEEP MENTIONING WARZONE AND A BATTLE ROYALE MODE FFS - And on another note, Frostbite engine can't be THAT hard to use, the hackers know it inside and out that's why in an interview with KZbinr GhostGaming they stated that they will have their cheats and hacks ready when the next BF game comes out - search for Ghosts video. FREE to play Battleroyale WILL kill battlefield once and for all and bring in all the sad cheaters and hackers, the dregs of the gaming community - A MAIN AIM WOULD BE TO KEEP THE HACKERS OUT leave stuff that to COD FFS along with the stupid skins and trinkets to hang on your weapon - it aint Battlefield!! Go on Dice f*ck this up... Ghost Recon's new game might be the next game on my playing list then.

[@Caboose858]

2042 was still leagues better than the new MW3,especially now that it’s a lot less buggy than at launch. I reinstalled it like a month ago and I have been having a ton of fun playing it again. Portal was the best at launch when you could choose the era you wanted to play but now the whole game is good

[@VancouverCanucksRock]

Oh cool, so 1/2 the classes will be Woemen, guaranteed. If not 3/4's;since, they can't shove Specialists down our throat.

[@undefinedhuman7404]

dawg, you clearly didn’t learn anything from 2042 if you’re hyped for this lol

[@thecosmonaut4221]

Skip to the last segment