Do the kosher food laws apply to Christians?

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

We keep Torah (Fathers Commandments) because Scripture says IF we Love the Father we WILL Keep HIS Commandments. Also when Paul wrote 2 Timothy 3:16 stating were to use ALL Scripture for Doctrine the NT wasn't canonized yet. All they had was the OT.

[@ervinhart1511]

Scroll and watch closely as he does his WebMD comparison of pork and lamb. Notice how he discovers the blessings and healthiness of pork, and then drives straight to the demon of lamb being," handle safely and prepare properly to avoid foodborne illnesses." ALL good carries that warning, but if you scroll carefully through the pork one, you will see a very long list of "unclean" things , that just aren't there in lamb. As well, I can't find a single scripture that describes a death sentence, or even a punishment, for eating pork. It could be argued that YAHWEH was making a dietary suggestion, not a commandment, ie " Thou shalt not eat bacon. For in the day that you eat bacon , ye shall surely die, or, "he shall be cut off from his people". Research those two terms in Exodus and Leviticus and you will soon find out how YAH let people know what was a command, and what was a health concern. Be well, Be blessed, PS, I am not a big fan of the fire and brimstone guy on the other side. We are called to be a light and example, I don't want HIS light, not his example.

[@ftldelay]

Your argument is flawed since you're disregarding what the early church believed. In 2 Peter 3:16, Peter calls Paul's letters "scripture", and the church at large was certainly aware of what Paul had been teaching, which would also be what the other disciples had been teaching.

[@rayray4192]

You don’t love God.

[@rayray4192]

You are babbling nonsense.

[@eazeetarget]

I love all your content. Even bought your Torahism book and I’m not a big reader. You are very clear in all your explanations. Do not change! Keep up the good work brother!

[@waltigerpo9714]

All Christians will agree that Jesus did live the law during his lifetime. He had to live a sinless life to be our perfect sacrifice for our redemption. There is a problem here now. A big problem. If you follow Mark 7:19 translated as “Jesus declared all foods clean” then he (Jesus) would have been changing God’s law. And if he were not a hypocrite, then, at that point in his ministry he would not only be telling others, but also living and practicing it himself along with his disciples. So let me expose what I perceive as flawed thinking. Christians believe that Jesus the Christ was a perfect man and therefore he was Redeemer and Savior. I have no problem here and I agree. The problem is the statement, "that Jesus declared all food clean". You say that "Jesus changed the law", and thus Jesus believed and taught “bon appétit “or “eat pigs “. As much as this would be nice, it is not what God said. Lev 11:13 "They shall not be eaten, they are an abomination (forbidden)". So, we should stop the debate right here. But if you were to make a case for that verse with the inclusion that “‘Jesus declared’ all foods clean”, then you would have serious problems. First, all Christian belief teaches that Jesus lived the law perfectly and died according to the law and therefore freed us from the bondage of the law at his death. How could Jesus have lived God's Law if he had changed God's law? How could Jesus simultaneously obey God's commandments if he radically changes or removed God's command to now eat what was forbidden, yes, God forbids these foods (Lev 11:13). “Jesus declaring all meats clean” did not fit with God's original clear commands (Lev 11). In 1Jn 3:4 it says " Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness, for sin is lawlessness”. So, the important question is did Jesus obey God's Law? Was Jesus the sinless and perfect sacrifice lamb to take away our sins? Second, if Jesus had changed the law during his life and did not fulfill the law as it is written, he would be contradicting his own teaching in the Gospels according to Matthew 5:17-18, “I came to fulfill the law“ and Mt. 5:19 “whoever removes a jot, or tittle from the law, is the least in the kingdom”. Therefore, Jesus would be considered a liar and hypocrite. I am also sure he would have lived his beliefs and taught them to his disciples too. This has not been evidenced in the Gospels (Mat 13:23-24). If He would have lived those beliefs, he would have been a sinner according to the Word of God. So, what is the answer? As I see it, we ought to stay as close to the Greek as possible. Recognize that Jesus had to obey the Father in what God set up in his Law, and not add to scripture. In John 15:10 Jesus says, “just as I have kept my father‘s commandments and abide in his love”. The most important thing to recognize here is that the Greek does not have the statement in Mark 7:19 “thus Jesus declared…” which changes the meaning of the passage. You just can’t find it in the Greek. And all the major translations before 1950 (Geneva Bible, Great Bible, ABP, Young’s Literal, KJV, NKJV, Darby, Tyndall, Webster, Wycliffe, Martin Luther’s version, Textus Receptus Greek, Westcott-Hort Greek and both my Greek versions) do not translate it as making all foods clean, but rather “but into the belly, and goes out into the waste bowl, purifying all foods?” (MKJV). It is talking only about the natural flow of the food through the body and that is all. For additional insight on Mar 7:19, we also have Mt 15:1-15, a parallel verse which is very clearly about ceremonially unclean hands. Mat 15:17 Do you not yet understand that whatever enters in at the mouth goes into the belly, and is cast out into the waste-bowl? Mat 15:18 But the things which come out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile the man. Mat 15:19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornication, thefts, false witness, blasphemies; Mat 15:20 these are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man. We also have Peter’s vision for some added perspective. About 7-10 years after Jesus’ resurrection, in Acts 10:9, during Peter’s vision of unclean food, Peter was very confused about eating unclean foods, and he said "I have never eaten unclean food". Peter was very much at peace to find out the vision was referring to Gentiles being considered unclean and not at all about food (Acts 10:28), and he changed the world by preaching the good news to Gentiles. So, can somebody please tell Peter that Jesus declared he could eat unclean food back when Jesus was still walking on earth? How much time and effort did Peter waste in vain and the thousands of souls that could have been converted because of a "wrong" lifestyle that Jesus supposedly changed 10 years before? So, either Peter is very slow at learning and observing Jesus's "new teaching" or he never got that teaching! So “Bon Appetit “? By no means! Authentic Christianity has always been returning back to its true Biblical roots. In fact, Christianity has been called Reformers, Protestantism (protesters), Puritans, Separatists, remnant, followers of the “narrow path“ and "The Way". Let’s make Christianity Holy again, Biblical Christianity. Mat 15:1 Then Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem and said, Mat 15:2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat.” Mat 15:3 He (Jesus) answered them, “And why do you break the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?" P. S. The Greek word for church in the Bible literally translates as “the called-out ones“. Let’s be the real church of God! 😊

[@truthwatch2858]

It’s about loving our brother and sister, Praise Jesus ❤

[@fatherofmany3018]

Only videos I've seen from that Enoch guy is him being very aggressive and harsh towards those who are not in the HRM.

[@billyhw99]

Hebrew Rooterism definitely has an image problem.

[@rayray4192]

He’s a pig that likes playing judge.

[@93556108]

i truly enjoyed by all your teachings. Congratulations please keep it up. Prat that God bless your Ministry.

[@waynehobbs5175]

Well explained, again, thank you Rob.

[@leo11190]

Thank you… once again, a very clear explanation of Yeshua’s fulfillment of Torah. I’m wondering if you can do a video on the Didache and the Torah’s influence on these writings of the apostles to the gentiles. Thank you as always for your videos … they are a gift to us Mr. Solberg.🙏🏽

[@G.S.Holland]

Yeshua is a modern interpretation name 7th Day Adventists came up with because they hate the name of Jesus. Do not be deceived. The son's name is pronounced differently in each tongue. This idea that the Catholic Church came up with Jesus to get people to say "Hail Zeus" is absurd on every level. Before the Sacred Name movement, which led into the Hebrew Roots movement and the modern Torah Truthers movement, the form of Yeshua is used by no one. Since the time of their movement, only the Sacred Name believers and people influenced by them, either directly or indirectly, use that version of the name of the Son. No such name exists in the Hebrew Bible nor in any Jewish/Hebrew English translations prior to the Sacred Name movement. To my knowledge, no such name exists in any extra-Biblical Hebrew literature. Dr. Ben-Gigi, an Israeli and the former head of Hebrew programs at Arizona State University, and author of First Steps in Hebrew Prayers and Fluent Biblical Hebrew, wrote that using “Yeshua” is "is rooted in a misunderstanding." He also writes, "there is no such name in Hebrew" and that "people invented it to fit their theology." is correct when he says that people invented the name Yahshua to fit their theology. I could go into much more detail, but His name, if you speak English is JESUS. Say it loud, say it proud, there's no other name by which we are saved. Those shaming others from using it are the same ones who want to shame Christians if they go to church on Sunday or eat pork. And this channel debunks nearly everything else about their movement. I hope the presenters exposes the "Yeshua" fraud for what it is. I will just share this: This modern translation can be traced back to the Sacred Name movement, which originated out of the Church of God, 7th Day, in the late 1930s. A source for this can be referenced in "A Brief History of the Name Movement in America" by L.D. Snow, a Sacred Name believer. According to Snow, John Briggs and Paul Penn were the first to pronounce and use the name Yahshua" (The alternate spelling is Snow’s). This was in 1936 and in 1937. Per the Sacred Name movement, they based this pronunciation on John 5:43, "I am come in My Father’s name." They reasoned “Yah” is the shortened name of the Father and must appear in the name of the Son. Yet Jesus never stated that His name contains His Father’s name. Or that His Father’s name must appear in His name. "I am come in My Father’s name" simply means Jesus came by His Father’s authority, on His Father’s behalf. Therefore, the reasoning they use to determine that the name of “Jesus,” which they reject because it doesn’t contain “Yah,” is the one “Yeshua” referred to as the “one who comes in his own name,” and therefore implies we should reject that person, is meaningless and a gross mistranslation. Jesus is referring to simply a human who comes in the name of their own authority. I have seen people claim that "Jesus" is the anti-Christ who deceived many to "Hail Zeus." The one who comes in his own name is King Caesar, as a study of Jesus' crucifiction account reveals how His statement is fulfilled later in the Gospel account. They rejected Jesus and said Ceasar was their true king. The anti-Christ/Satan who demands to be worshipped as God would love nothing more than to have people worship him under one name only, not different names among different tongues. Think about that. As with other Hebrew Movement points RL Solberg debunks, I doubt that for the better part of 2000 years the true intention and texts of the Church fathers was hidden and unknown and only in the late 1800s and early 1900s did people "crack the case" and reveal that everything we thought about Jesus was wrong. No, that's end times deception. Pray up, wake up.

[@leo11190]

@@G.S.Holland Thank you for your insight and the time you took to respond to my post. Everything you said seems to be based on historical research…. I will definitely look into this. Bless you.

[@spnola9650]

You have been mislead. Vist this channel for truth kzbin.info/www/bejne/qprOkGynaZesg68

[@onejohn2.26]

It is not a clear explanation it is deception

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

According to you Paul taught the dangerous beliefs of Torah-ism...... Here Are Examples Of Paul Keeping Torah: * Circumcised Timothy (Acts 16:1-3) * Took the nazarite vow (Acts 18:18; 21:17-26) * Taught and observed Gods holy days such as: * Passover (Acts 20:6; 1Cor. 5:6-8; 11:17-34) * Shavuot (Pentecost) (Acts 20:16; 1Cor. 16:8) * Fasting on Yom Kippur (Acts 27:9) . Paul and others made a Temple sacrifice for their Nazarite vow, . So Paul went to the Temple the next day with the other men. They had already started the purification ritual, so he publicly announced the date when their vows would end and sacrifices would be offered for each of them. Acts 21:26 . . Paul kept the Sabbath Acts 18:4 - And he (Paul) reasoned in the synagogue every Sabbath, and persuaded the Jews and the Greeks.(Gentiles) . . Paul taught that a believer in Yeshua the Messiah is saved by grace through faith (Ephesians 2:8-9). . After we are saved by grace through faith, Paul taught that we should follow the Torah (Romans 3:28-31). . . Paul followed the Torah through the help of the Holy Spirit (Romans 7:22). . . Paul did not teach people to observe the law in order to be saved or justified. . . That was not the purpose of the law. . . He taught them to observe the law in order to honor God as they walked out the Christian life in the footsteps of their Lord Jesus. . . By this we know that we love the children of God, when we love God, and keep HIS commandments. For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments: and his commandments are not grievous. .....1 John 5:2-3 KJV . . I dont have all the bible answers but IF Messiah declared the unclean, clean, by abolishing the Law of Elohim His PERFECT TORAH, Psalms 19:7, Instructions, Teachings for righteous SET APART living in this evil wicked world then HE SINNED by transgressing Deut 4:2 AND that would make Isaiah a False Prophet for making this end time prophesy of Messiahs return ….. Isaiah 66:15-17 . For, behold, the LORD will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire. . 16 For by fire and by his sword will the LORD plead with all flesh: and the slain of the LORD shall be many. . 17 They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one [tree] in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, Jeff. I’m not sure how many of my videos you’ve watched. But my position is that keeping those things is _permitted, but not required._ None of the things you listed about Paul was forbidden or prohibited. So we would certainly expect Jewish followers of Jesus to continue to observe those things. But they are not obligations for any follower of Christ. They are optional under the New Covenant. See: 1 Cor 9:19-23. Shalom, Rob

[@coffeeinfluence6444]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Can you do a video to please reconcile all this information with Isaiah 66:17-24

[@energizer7354]

“Real” Christians…. That is such a condescending and judgmental term.

[@graysonbr]

Gentiles who became Israelites under the Old Testament were not even required to keep kosher laws. Your videos have been helpful being one that likes material from Daniel Juster and FFOZ. Those sources are a lot more lenient with Torah application btw. I still think certain festivals should be kept in light of things to come as they foreshadow prophetic elements and not the legality of keeping those days. The mistake that many in the Hebrew Roots movement make is a type of constructivism and have a lack of understanding of justification by grace through faith. Also seen some break the 9th commandment in slandering other Christians.

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

You're unlearned in Scripture.... What was the meaning and importance of the Jerusalem Council? kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5vGnWSlp76Lj5I

[@graysonbr]

@@Jeffmacaroni1542 Thanks for posting this, I really appreciate this, I seriously don't believe I am far off in the thinking of video you presented. Gentile revisionism of ecclesiastical matters lends to a type of Nicolatian authoritarianism. I have not read Roberts book on Divergence and am interested on how he approaches this matter. The thing is that there needs to be an open dialogue with other assemblies to understand what was presented in the video. I would like to see the various denominations invited to some sort of conference on this topic. It's 2023, no pandemic, I would totally support this effort!

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

@@graysonbr Actually I need to start speaking using love not accusing people of being unlearned in Scripture, Were all unlearned in some areas, But we're saved by grace through faith then after that is where many disagree but were saved nonetheless. Jeff

[@spnola9650]

Sorry guys but nowhere in scripture does it say all foods are clean. Peter's dream was about the gentiles not food. Jesus took the punishment of the law. However, if you want to love God with all your heart mind and soul you will keep his commandmeets. Ye be separate!

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

“And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” _(Thus he declared all foods clean.)”_ ‭‭Mark‬ ‭7‬:‭18‬-‭19‬

[@spnola9650]

@@TheBiblicalRoots You can't take scripture out of context. The pharisees were trying to say that disciples had unwashed hands and therefore would be defiled. Jesus said what goes in a man's mouth does not defile him. This has nothing to do with food it's just a stretch that people want to make because they want to eat anything they want.. Jesus came to fulfill the consequences of the law so we don't have to pay for our sins because he already did . Jesus said the greatest commandment is to love God with all your heart mind and soul. You do that by keeping his commandments. Ye be separate!

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

​@@spnola9650 Thanks, Sp Nola! Yes, the Pharisees began the discussion talking about washing hands, but Jesus responded (as he often does) with a much broader teaching. "What goes into a person" is not unwashed hands, it's food. And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) Mark 7:18-19 Shalom, RLS

[@andrejones2147]

The funny part if we all stay in context, for an Israelite especially, which Jesus and the Pharisees were, What food is and what food isn’t was defined in Leviticus…God said unclean meats are not meat for you. Which means unclean meats aren’t food… with that being said a conversation between Israelites about food isn’t talking about unclean meats lol you gotta stay in context. There is no way to back your point . And to say Jesus fulfilled this law is a lie because Jesus didn’t even die on the cross at this point in time when he made this statement lol your hilarious

[@onejohn2.26]

​@@TheBiblicalRootsthe context of those verses was that the Pharisees were complaining that the apostles were eating without washing their hands! Stop deceiving people all of the law that applies to us under the conditions we are in applies to each and every person on the earth and as Enoch said eating pork is sin because it is a violation of the Torah we should gospel John specifically Defines what sin is a violation of the Torah 99.9 percent of Christians will not be saved because of teachings like yours

[@Unknown86483]

I don't know much about Christopher Enoch, but i do know he rejects the Apostle Paul.

[@StretchJED]

Unfortunately, that is where most Hebrew roots folks end up, rejecting Paul.

[@jaylar6442]

10:06 I'm pretty sure God wants us to be holy as well (Eph. 1:4; Eph. 5:27; 1 Peter 1:15-16)

[@timbeauxclary]

Well done, Rob.

[@jaylar6442]

7:21 another article??? Is that article ALSO more knowledgeable than God's Word? Come on, dude.

[@jaylar6442]

Mark 7 was not about what meat hould be considered food. Read the whole chapter. It was a conversation about whether or not it's sin to eat with unwashed hands. Guess what? The Torah never says anything about washing your hands before you eat bread. Not to mention, at the time this passage was written, no one considered pig to be food. Pork was not considered food.

[@mirzafatic1663]

Absolutely right 🙌

[@calebmundle5948]

Great video. Also worth mentioning, animals that don’t conform fully to their class (swarming things that crawl on the ground, chew cud, etc..) are declared unholy.

[@edwardcuevas5667]

I have always eaten goat just didn't understand what foods we can eat thanks for clearing that

[@onejohn2.26]

Read Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14

[@gospeltrax2513]

You quoted (Thus he declared all foods clean.) from the NT. These words are in brackets because they were added-in by the translators, who deduced (incorrectly) that this passage "declared all foods clean" - which it does not. The translators are making the same mistake you are making. In Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits that looked like frogs coming out of the mouths of the dragon, the beast, and the false prophet. We see "unclean" spirits being symbolized by frogs (an unclean animal). Peter explains that we "Christians" are "Israel". Paul explains that we "Christians" have been grafted-into "Israel". In the Book of Revelation, the "saints" or the "Elect" are those that 1) Keep the Commandments of God, and 2) Have faith in Jesus. [Rev 12:17, Rev 14:12] Finally, Jesus Himself said, "If you Love Me, then Keep My Commandments." Jesus also said, "Why do you call me Lord, Lord, and do not what I say?" Jesus lived a perfect, sinless life. This means He kept all of the Commandments. For sin is the transgression of the Law. We are commanded to "sin no more - be perfect - as your Father in Heaven is perfect." So the only conclusion we can make is that we MUST OBEY the commandments of God. Gentiles are not exempt from this Biblical directive because Gentiles are brought from darkness into the Light of Scripture - and Gentiles become of the household of Israel (God's Chosen People) when they believe in Jesus, and they become "BORN-AGAIN".

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Actually, GT, the phrase "thus he declared all foods clean" was not added by translators. It's in our earliest manuscripts. That comment was added by the author of the Gospel of Mark. Jesus didn't utter those words, of course. Which is why many translations put them in parentheses. But its a comment added by the author to summarize what Jesus was teaching. Shalom, Rob

[@gospeltrax2513]

He who says, “I KNOW HIM”, and does not keep His commandments, is a liar and the truth is not in him. [1 John 2:4]

[@beckyfrechette4439]

I’ve read through a ton of comments and replies on this video and I am thoroughly grossed out. I was once in the Torah movement, spent almost 6 years in it. At least half of those years of thinking I was better than mainstream Christians because I “had Torah”. Thinking I was qualified to school people on how the Torah works and how it still applies, etc. Criticizing mainstream Christianity and its “disregard” of Torah, etc… Reading the comments here reminds me of that same spirit. Yuck. I quoted from the same script, used the identical same arguments, clearly listened to the same teachers (though Torah followers will tell you they weren’t influenced by anyone). The Gospel is NOT taught in Torah observant churches, Jesus is an after thought, Torah is the focus. Glad that is behind me. Thankful to have been brought back to the TRUTH of mainstream Christianity. A decision to remove my Torah observant glasses and to do a plain reading of Paul’s writings was what opened my eyes. Even though I was reading my bible daily before, it wasn’t until I purposely ignored the indoctrination from Torah teachers that I saw the very clear message of the bible. Thankful for those exposing this false gospel! Christians need to be warned and made aware!

[@AlwaysLime]

I’ve come to the conclusion that HRM people believe Christ changed nothing. So why does it matter to them that he died on the cross? And they are so angry. A belief system that causes bad fruit. They want to tell me all the right ways and times to do things, but all I can hear is the anger, pride and lack of love that is motivating what they are saying. They seem to want to convert Christian to Christianity, while a lost and dying world is in need of The Gospel Message. It seems like the devil is causing this division so the focus will be completely gone of reaching the unsaved.

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

:Christians are quick to quote Leviticus 18:22 about the abomination of homosexuality, Yet they never quote Leviticus 11, Deut 14 about the abomination of eating unclean, Hmm., Christians just love their Bacon more than they love God.

[@joshuamelton9148]

Christopher Enoch reminds me of the Atheist Aron Ra with a haircut

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

Isiah 66:15-17 is a serious last days warning about those who eat unclean. Lev 11, Deut 14. Either Isaiah was a false prophet or Pastors today are wrong about the unclean becoming clean.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Actually, Jeff, those aren't our only two options. Stay tuned for my next video coming out Thursday. We're going to look at Isaiah 66 (among other passages). Blessings, Rob

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

@@TheBiblicalRoots You give your own interpretation.

[@waltigerpo9714]

The 1 Cor 15 verses refers only to eating meat ( clean ) to sacrificed idols. Not to eating unclean meats.

[@kennethknott9138]

But eating meat sacrificed to idols was not permitted under the Mosaic Law. If it's permissible to eat such meats, why not also "unclean" meats? The answer is that something radically and wonderfully changed concerning the Law, and that was its jurisdiction, which only applied to a living Jew. Believers, however, are dead to the Law and have risen with Christ.

[@billyhw99]

@@kennethknott9138 Amen.

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

@@kennethknott9138 Isiah 66:15-17 is a serious last days warning about those who eat unclean. Lev 11, Deut 14. Either Isaiah was a false prophet or Pastors today are wrong about the unclean becoming clean.

[@jaylar6442]

Trying to coin a catch-all name like "Torah -ism" won't make it any easier to dismiss Scripturally.

[@AdamBror]

What about fat? Fat is not said to be unclean in the torah so maybe it's still a sin? Acts also mentions blood, in lev 3 we see blood and fat in the same place, do not eat them. Why is it ok to eat fat then? And blood?

[@sundownsam3369]

I believe that true Gentile Christian believers, those who have a relationship with God through Yeshua, are saved; they have just been engraved with the lie that God's laws are done away with. God's laws are implanted in their minds and hearts, and they are ignorant of this truth. If they are married and lie with another man's wife, they understand and know exactly what sin they have committed, which is proof that the law is embedded in them, and I am not only talking about the Decalogues. As for Rob Solberg and many theologians, they need to trash their theology degrees and allow the Spirit of God to teach them scriptural truth. Gentile Christian believers, instead of leaning on the false teachings and false doctrines of these men, trust in God to teach you, even to teach you how to test if what is being taught is according to the Scriptures, and instead of responding with what you have been engraved with, why don't you truthfully weigh what is being said, then ask God to enlighten your mind with scriptural truth? Ask God to remove the wax in your ears that prevents you from understanding scriptural truth or to make another hole in your ears to allow yourselves to understand scriptural truth. Let me make this clear: I am sure that there are many theologians who are believers who ignorantly teach what they were taught and engraved with instead of teaching according to the Scriptures, but there are those who deliberately teach against what God made clear the first time he spoke. To say that the law of God is not required but permissible, you better really sit down and ask God about that statement.

[@TheWelshMaverick]

Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. Matthew 5:19

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

Moral, Ceremonial, Civil laws are found nowhere in Scripture. Just more man made commands like the Pharisees did who honored their own added commandments over Fathers Commandments. Mark 7:13 Making the word of God of none effect through your tradition.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

The idea of moral, civil, and ceremonial laws is certainly a man-made classification, Jeff. But they aren't commandments in and of themselves. Rather, it's a helpful way of understanding God's commands and why some remain and others do not. R.

[@patricialauriello3805]

I am a Catholic and eat anything I want. The bread of Christ is the best!

[@Nogames2281]

AMEN🙌

[@straitmind4762]

Rock on dude. Stay free. Those waffles are hot.

[@patricialauriello3805]

Gentiles are not under the law@@scented-leafpelargonium3366

[@coffeeinfluence6444]

Can you do a video to please reconcile all this information with Isaiah 66:17-24

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi, CI! I look at the OT prophecies, including Isaiah 66, in this video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/fYTNq4SufqaMgrc Blessings, Rob

[@rayray4192]

I eat pork regularly. My health is excellent. The little boy is ignorant. Christianity is not about the lunch menu.

[@rayray4192]

You can be in terrible health and be reconciled to God and a born again Christian.

[@siervodedios5952]

Exodus 12: 19, 48-49, Exodus 20:10, Leviticus 18:26, Leviticus 19:34, Numbers 15:14, 16, Deuteronomy 5:14. Dietary laws, feast days, Sabbath, and circumcision for Gentiles. Yet Gentiles never had to keep them eh? Come on, man. In Mark 7:18-19 Jesus was responding to the Pharisees who were mad Jesus and His Apostles were eating with unwashed hands. That's what He meant when He said that what goes into a person doesn't defile them.

[@sundownsam3369]

Rob Solberg: Assuming that the Tanakh clearly states that Yeshua made the covenant with Israel, Will he speak against the covenants? Yes or no? If yes, why, and if no, why? Most likely, you will not respond to this question, being that you avoid responding to questions I ask. Anyone can respond, but I really like Rob Solberg to respond, but I doubt it.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

What do you mean by "speak against the covenants," Sam?

[@sundownsam3369]

​@@TheBiblicalRoots If Yeshua made the covenants with Israel, will he speak against the covenants that he made, that is if he made them?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

@@sundownsam3369 What do you mean by "speak against the covenants," Sam?

[@sundownsam3369]

Let's assume Yeshua was the one who gave what you refer to as the mosaic covenant to Israel, would you still hold that they are not required but are permissible? Why or why not?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

@Sundown Sam As part of the Godhead, Yeshua _was_ the One who made the covenant with Israel at Sinai. He was there and knew, even as the covenant was made, that Israel would not be able to keep it. "And the Lord said to Moses: “You are going to rest with your ancestors, and these people will soon prostitute themselves to the foreign gods of the land they are entering. They will forsake me and break the covenant I made with them" (Deut 31:16). And at that time He also knew that He was the only One who would be able to keep that law perfectly and fulfill it. So in the fulness of time, "The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us" (John 1:14). And after living a sinless life, Yeshua laid down His life as our perfect sin sacrifice "once for all" (Heb 10:10), which would bring the Mosaic covenant to an end (Gal 3:24-25), and usher in God's New Covenant (Jer 31:31-34; Luke 22:20). Yeshua is the reason that Christians are not under the Law of Moses. Shalom, Rob

[@danielnicholas5911]

So if I go along with Dr. Solberg's conclusion that Christians don't have to follow or practice the Mosaic Laws and only practice love then Leviticus 20:15 no longer applies and I can love my pets in a more special way and receive no condemnation from God because as a New Covenant believer, I am no longer under the laws that the Lord gave Moses on Mt. Sinai.....Correct?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Ha! Not even close, Daniel. The "laws" of God that run the universe and define right and wrong were true long before the Law of Moses was given. So when God commands us not to murder today, it’s not because of the Ten Commandments. It’s because of His universal principle against murder. Long before God gave Israel the Law of Moses, Cain was judged for murdering his brother Abel (Gen 4:8-16). Same thing with sexual morality. Under the New Covenant, God doesn’t forbid adultery because of the Ten Commandments. Unfaithfulness and sexual immorality were wrong long before the Law of Moses, as we see, for example, in the story of Sodom and Gomorrah (Gen 18-19). Because mankind was made in God’s image, we have a compass of objective morality, so to speak, baked into our human DNA. R.

[@danielnicholas5911]

Interesting and enlightening response. So, if I understand God's universal principles that, as you say, existed prior to Moses obtaining the Laws of God on Mt Sinai then all the followers of God had the correct DNA to know how to love God (Deuteronomy 6:5) and love neighbor(Lev. 19:18) prior to Moses. Then God switched to a written Commandment based system with the children of Israel with Moses fulfilling the role of mediator, then Christ came and reestablished God's universal principles via objective morality thus no need for the laws of Moses....Is this a correct interpretation of your teachings?

[@danielnicholas5911]

When God instructed Noah to have more "clean" animals to enter the Ark than the unclean(Genesis 7:2) Noah knew the difference between clean and unclean animals without God having to define it. Was that based on your DNA theory of objective morality from your ethics class in a college philosophy school or had God, as a good father, instructed His child Noah in His Law.....you know....the thou shall and thou shall nots?

[@danielnicholas5911]

If God has bake "moral objectivity" into our DNA so from the beginning then why did he bother to give the Law, then go back to not needing it. Also, what's the point in training up a child in way he shall go when his DNA is already set from birth. This could explain predestination. Some DNA baked long enough to kill the leaven and some didn't. Obviously, So those at Sodom and Gomorrah didn't bake long enough so God gave it one more try with a fire from heaven.

[@georgebossie7426]

If sin is the transgression of the law, and although we are saved by grace, we should reject and avoid sin, dosnt that mean we should eat under dietary laws?

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi George. "Sin" can't be defined as a transgression of the Law of Moses, because that would mean that Adam and Eve never sinned. Rather, sin is disobeying what God has commanded of *you.* Not every command that God has given applies to every person at all times. Some of His commands were only given to certain people (ex. Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses), or for certain times (ex. building an ark, gathering manna) and we're each only expected to keep the commands of God that apply to us. And the ceremonial Mosaic commands do not apply to Christians today. (ex. Repeated blood sacrifices for sin are no longer required.) Blessings, Rob

[@jaylar6442]

If what defines a true Christian is solely love for our neighbor, then we should really stop proselytizing Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Catholics, Atheists, and most everybody else. Sounds like they're already followers of Christ.

[@ervinhart1511]

I posted this as a reply, but decided to bring it up here as well. "Scroll and watch closely as he does his WebMD comparison of pork and lamb. Notice how he discovers the blessings and healthiness of pork, and then drives straight to the demon of lamb being," handle safely and prepare properly to avoid foodborne illnesses." ALL good carries that warning, but if you scroll carefully through the pork one, you will see a very long list of "unclean" things , that just aren't there in lamb. As well, I can't find a single scripture that describes a death sentence, or even a punishment, for eating pork. It could be argued that YAHWEH was making a dietary suggestion, not a commandment, ie " Thou shalt not eat bacon. For in the day that you eat bacon , ye shall surely die, or, "he shall be cut off from his people". Research those two terms in Exodus and Leviticus and you will soon find out how YAH let people know what was a command, and what was a health concern. Cheery-picking has never excelled as an exemplary cornerstone for one's theology. Look at the actions of the disciples and apostles. Read and observe how after Y'shua ascended they rested on Sundays ( actually they were accused of doing it, and Stephen was martyred for it FALSELY, so imagine if they had actually done it? Would we not read at least once about how bacon , or porkchops tasted, just ONCE? Allow the Ru'Ach to enlighten you, use you Heavenly sight. Don't let men blind you to the truth. Oh ya, remember that time Y'shua had pork? Aren't we to be like him? Do as HE did? 🤔 " Wise as serpents and harmless as doves." Be well, Be blessed, Shabbat Shalom PS, I am not a big fan of the fire and brimstone guy on the other side, Mr Enoch? We are called to be a light and example, I don't want Mr Enoch's light, nor his example. Footnote. 13:10 he states that the Law, Hebrew word in Strong's H8451 = from H3384; a precept or statute, especially the Decalogue or Pentateuch:-law, was ONLY given to the Israelites. Numbers 15.29 would cause that idea some problems. These are the Egyptians that left with the freed Israelites. One might conclude , that Yahweh is saying, if you follow my laws and commandments ( and dietary suggestions) you will recieve the protection and blessings of the law. And Psalm 1:1 " Blessed is the " man " , not " Blessed is the Israelite or Jew or chosen person or Prophet ,,,,,." 13:20 , I am a Gentile Rob, ( not like you ) , I am graphed in. Romans 11 for sure, but even before that , through Ephraim. Joseph married the daughter of an Egyptian high priest, and in Hebrew tradition, the mother determines nationality. AND when Isaac crossed his hands, Ephraim and Manasseh received a double portion,1 blessing through Isaac, and 1 through Joseph. It's all in the OT somewhere. Jeremiah 3:8 is where Yahweh divorced Israel, he had to establish another covenant, but it ran alongside the Mosiac one. You can have more than one covenant running at a time. The Abrahamic covenant ran alongside the Mosiac one, and the first Mosiac covenant still kept going while Moseh brought on the other one from YAH. Notice Deut 5:2 and Deut 29:1 , 2 separate covenants. Notice the word " beside " in the second passage.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Thanks, Ervin! You suggested, "It could be argued that YAHWEH was making a dietary suggestion, not a commandment," but that argument could not be made from Scripture. Leviticus 11 makes it very clear that the food restrictions are a commandment of God. That chapter is packed full of "shall" and "shall not" statements. And obedience to those commands falls under the terms of the Mosaic covenant (Deut 28). Scripture also tells us why the food laws were given, and it was not a matter of health or nutrition. Those food laws were given as a way for Israel to be holy, which means "set apart for God" (Lev 20:25-26). Shalom, Rob

[@ervinhart1511]

@@TheBiblicalRoots exactly, when YAHWEH tells you to not do something, or DO something, he leaves very little doubt. Therefore, if he changed his mind about not following Sabbath as 7th day, eating things he declared unclean, and that his feasts don't matter anymore,,,, is not reasonable to expect that HE, or Y'shua, at least 1 apostle or discipline would have gotten an email, text, Instagram, or they have even done a quick tictoc vid about it, I am sure something THAT important would have been repsted across all social media platforms. But nothing, nadda, not even anything in the aprocrapha. You are adding to the scriptures, something that is forbidden. Mark 7:7-8 & Matt 15:9 , you are teaching traditional view points, just like the Pharisees of Y'shua's time, and he fought vehemently against the "adding to " & " taking away " from the scriptures. Shalom

[@onejohn2.26]

No penalty for eating pork? Violating the Torah is sin according to the Gospel of John in the punishment for sin is spiritual death

[@judemichaelvelez6789]

Fully agree...amen and amen. Life in Christ is not about eating and drinking. Real christians even refrain from admitting they are one in public....its the people around them that say they are so because of their fruits. Again, i thank God for Dr. Solberg. Prayers for u and family. Shalom

[@danielnicholas5911]

Life in Christ is walking as He walked. Did Christ have food addictions or was He a glutton......No....See on KZbin - Gluttony by Billy Graham (hard hitting 15 minute sermon on what Rev.Graham refers to the most common sin amongst those IN the Church). Why some which gluttony in the church today? In the popular belief in antinomianism, we are under grace and Law is abolished. Thus no sin to eat ..... Right? Rev.Graham begs to differ.

[@onejohn2.26]

Christianity is about faith and obedience to the laws of God The creator of this video is absolutely wrong

[@gillianjackson9403]

1Corinthians 10:31 "Whether therefore ye eat or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God". There is not one part of our lives that our Heavenly Father is not interested in. Unfortunately wishy- washy teaching would have you believe there's areas of our life that doesn't interest/bother/concern God.

[@jaylar6442]

13:06 "Jesus was Jewish" Excellent! That leaves the door wide open for anyone to dismiss literally ANY Law from the Torah they don't want to do...."those were the ones for the Jews, and I'm not Jewish." What about 1 John 2:6? "Walk as [Jesus] walked, except for those Jewish laws. He just kept those because He was a Jew." Right? Is that what it says?

[@folkeholtz6351]

Ity is most intresting to know that the Phrase : Thus he declared all foods clean is wrong translation. it says this: " It comes out at the toalett, Cleaning all food." it is the digesting in the stomach and tarms which clean the food. So the words Heeby he declared ..." is not in the Greek text al all. Have you Solberg not seen this? It as not all about food but about washing the hands the discussion started. Keep it to that and do not mix it with Kosherfood. Going now to Acts 10 and hear Peter saying: " I have never eating any unclean food. So Jesus coule not have teach his disciples to eat non-kosher-food. Now the vision has to be interpret, and Peter does understand that it has not to do with Kosher laws WHICH IS STILL VALID!!!!!!!!!!!!!! for Jews!!!! But the interpretation he gets when he arrive to Cornelius. I know that God does not make any differences between people,but if any seek God he will be received by Him. So dear Solberg The Kosher law as well as the whole Sinai-Covenant is still valid. But to be a true Christian has nothing to do with keeping Kosher but to believe in Jesus.

[@SpotterVideo]

New Covenant Whole Gospel: Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. Watch the KZbin videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.

[@judgejury5177]

Why is this a confusing issue with Christians? Kosher laws were given to the Jewish people when God have them the Torah. They were never meant for nonjews. Acts 21 makes it clear what non Jews who were believers should follow. The Jewish council gave them 4 things to follow. Rob is wrong in saying that Kosher laws are done away with Jesus.Jews who are believers should follow Kosher laws. Jesus fulfilled the Torah but he didn’t take away or abolish the Torah. It’s 2 different meanings. Check Matt 5:18. Kosher laws are part of the eternal covenant God made with the Jewish people. Rob is confused on this. The Torah means instructions in Hebrew. It was never meant to attain salvation but it was Gods instructions on how to live a righteous life.

[@billyhw99]

Jesus is for Jews too. Jewish believers in Jesus are Christians, and are part of the New and better Covenant now. They are under no obligation to continue keeping the ceremonial precepts of the Old and obsolete Covenant any more.

[@judgejury5177]

Jewsish believers in Jesus aren’t Christians. They continue to be Jews. Christians are non Jews that believe in Jesus. Matt 5:18 , Jesus confirms the Torah is intact. Acts 21, Paul confirms the same thing. I’m sorry but What your saying is not scriptural based..

[@billyhw99]

@@judgejury5177 Sola Scriptura is so amazing it is the gift that never stops giving, thank you Martin Luther.

[@judgejury5177]

Why don’t you include scripture to support your view point?

[@scottmoran9338]

God gave the laws to all of isreal, all the 12 tribes which includes the the 10 lost tribes disperse amoungst the nations otherwise called gentiles The Jews were just a small minority of those given the law too. Let’s not forget, the law does not bring salvation into covenant with God, the law was for righteous living for those already in covenant

[@tkmasala]

I can't believe people are still using that phrase in brackets in Mark 7. Scholars agree it was a copyist insertion. I wish bibles would be honest and remove these known additions. Like this and the woman caught in adultery.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hi, Tom! With the passage about the woman caught in adultery, you'll notice that in most translations, that passage is [[placed inside brackets like this.]] And the reason for that is explained in the footnotes. For example, the ESV footnote says: "Some manuscripts do not include 7:53-8:11; others add the passage here or after 7:36 or after 21:25 or after Luke 21:38, with variations in the text." We do not find the same thing with Mark 7:19 because Scholars don't agree it was a copyist insertion. Why? Because the Greek phrase καθαριζων παντα τα βρωματα appears in the earliest manuscripts. For example, you can see it for yourself in the Codex Sinaiticus: codexsinaiticus.org/en/manuscript.aspx?book=34&chapter=7&lid=en&side=r&verse=19&zoomSlider=0 Shalom, Rob

[@shellyblanchard5788]

What it is people want to put a curse upon people because want to eat certain foods. God told Noah he could could eat whatever he wants with an except of a few things after the flood. God said he gave it to them for food. My mother claimed that you should not eat pork because it caused gout. It probably would if you ate enough of it, but it doesn't make us sinful. 🤗

[@scottmoran9338]

Ther was 7 clean and 2 unclean of all animals So if Noah even then knew was was classed as clean and food. had he eaten anything unclean, that would have been the end of that animal forever as it would not be able to mate and reproduce. Now what is highlighted by this that the knowledge was there beforehand, is that the commands and laws of God, are not new rules, but a reminder of what is acceptable to God to those who had been enslaved and forgotten his ways.

[@shellyblanchard5788]

@@scottmoran9338 you have to remember, things were a bit different in Noah's day. Clean and unclean didn't matter. God preserved them on the ark. It wasn't until the old covenant that Moses was told of what could and couldn't be eaten of the animals. We are no longer under that covenant to keep the food laws. It doesn't mean you have eat them, it just a thing if you want to or not. Just like if you want peach pie or pumpkin pie.

[@scottmoran9338]

@@shellyblanchard5788 there was already a distinction between what God deemed clean and unclean. So why would Noah and his family chose what God had classed as unclean, when we know Noah trusted what God said. If somone tells me something is dirty, I don’t think ok I’ll eat it. So why would Noah be any different. If he was different, then he would of put his judgment above Gods. Now if we come to God like most do, which is to start from sinful, and try and strip back from there. Then maybe we miss what is deemed food, as our minds already class certain things as food. But if we come from a place of emptiness, knowing nothing like Jesus instructs us too, like a little child, then we need to put all our trust in God and ask him what is clean to eat. And when we do it that way, we see clearly what he says. See the laws were never abolished. Jesus clearly says he hasn’t come to abolish them. And Paul has no authority to abolish them either. And the law is not the covenant. It is the instructions of righteousness to those in covenant. But we are under a new covenant, because we broke the first. So Jesus brings us back into a new covenant rather then leaving us separate from God. Roman Churchology has taught us Jesus came to set us free from living the way God instructed us.

[@kennethknott9138]

@@scottmoran9338 Scott - consider that God told Noah in Gen: 9:3 that ALL creeping things were good for food, when prior they were not (only green herbs were permitted). If you want to advocate that God was only talking about clean animals, then you must be hermeneutically consistent with the first part of the chapter and the rest, which would lead to the very awkward conclusion that only clean animals would have the fear of man (verse 2) and that God's covenant would only be with clean animals (verses 10-11). Of course, that just doesn't make sense. It's much more plausible to interpret just as it reads, that God made ALL animals food for Noah and his descendants. So yes, Noah could eat a rabbit or a snake if he wanted to. You cited in a previous post that eating unclean animals would make them extinct because there only one pair on the ark. Torah observers seem to love to cite that argument as a "gotcha" moment, when really there is no gotcha at all. For starters, Noah's family could certainly do the math - they could have deferred to preserve a species until it repopulated, so your problem is solved. Or, they could have eaten an unclean animal right away, such that it had no chance to populate - in which case, so what? Face it- Noah and his family could eat all living things. That is what the text says. It was not until Moses that the Law was given to the Israelites stating otherwise.

[@scottmoran9338]

@@kennethknott9138 when we use this argument, we must put it to the plants and fruit. Now we all know there are some plants and fruit that would be unsafe to eat. We also know that by the numbers of what Noah took on to the ark, he knew what animals God deemed clean and unclean. And he knows by the sacrifices that it’s only the clean that are pleasing to God. So when it comes to eat, thoug he physically could eat any…. Does he make his decision based on his own thinking, or does he base his choice on what God thinks. Does he eat snake, knowing God says it’s dirty and doesn’t find pleasing to sacrafice. Now I base my option that Noah trusted Gods judgment above his own. After all he built an ark, when there was no rain because God said so, so he deffinetly trusted him above his own understanding. We are all created to be an image of God, to represent his ways, to like what he like and dislike what he dislikes, why would Noah have been any different

[@FormerTrucker]

Fully cooked pork is the key.. I love Bacon!

[@onejohn2.26]

So you bother bacon more than you love Jesus? Good luck with that

[@johndias3993]

Many mite want to do a study on the word "liberty " which is what our fathers laws brings if you keep it!

[@estilldotson2284]

Ok so how can Jesus brake and follow this command at the same time-Deu 4:2 - Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Hello, estill. When the Lord said "you shall not add to or take away from my commands," who was He talking to? Rob

[@estilldotson2284]

All of Israel, the native born and the stranger one law for all

[@estilldotson2284]

@@TheBiblicalRootsstill does this now can we can add to other laws or take away if jesus did we can do like he did right ???

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

@@estilldotson2284 Right, the warning about not adding or taking away from the Torah was given to the Israelites. Those rules are for God's people, not God Himself. R.

[@estilldotson2284]

​@@TheBiblicalRoots ok so let me get this straight ? so Jesus came and rebuked the Pharisees for adding and taking away from Torah and not following Torah and called them hypocrites then Jesus took away from Torah but sense Jesus is God its not a sin form him Deu 4:2? Gal 4:4,born under the law 1Pe 1:19without blemish and without spot 1Pe 2:22 Who did no sin Heb 4:15 was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin..../..thanks for your patience Rob and may you have a blessed night.

[@savvycavvy7859]

Kudos my brother! I’ve heard of that guy Christopher Enoch before. I’ve kind of noticed that many of these Torah teachers amazingly have old testament biblical names??? Anyways, thank you. And also thank you for mentioning about quote that he declared all foods clean”… their argument is that was added by the translators! However if you look in the king James version, it is all red letters!! “Purging all foods“, of course as you have taught before, “purging“ clearly means “cleansing“! Praise God for some honest teaching!

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

Isiah 66:15-17 is a serious last days warning about those who eat unclean. Lev 11, Deut 14. Either Isaiah was a false prophet or Pastors today are wrong about the unclean becoming clean.

[@siervodedios5952]

@@Jeffmacaroni1542 Ah but they wanna ignore the Prophets and the Old Testament at large. They'd rather just read the New Testament and very little of the Old Testament.

[@PopoolaTemidayo]

Jesus didn’t married, then by Hebrew Root team logic we shouldn’t marry too since we want to follow Christ by example 😊

[@PopoolaTemidayo]

@@scented-leafpelargonium3366 fallacy of generalization. How many percentage of catholic do not marry for you to claim that was what catholic do? You see how your mind stinks? However they didn’t claimed they didn’t marry because Jesus didn’t.

[@digimike8]

🥓🥓🥓If you believe in keeping the Kosher food laws aren't you saying Messiahs sacrifice on the cross wasn't enough? 🦐🦐🦐

[@siervodedios5952]

As Christians we are to follow in Christ's footsteps. Christ was circumcised, kept the holy feast days like Passover, Feast of Tabernacles, etc. He ate clean and didn't eat unclean junk described Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14.

[@digimike8]

@@siervodedios5952 No where in scripture Hebrew Torah or Messianic Torah does it give food laws, Sabbath or feasts to gentiles. It just doesn't. You make implied references because of what we know but it's not what scripture teaches.

[@siervodedios5952]

@@digimike8 No dietary laws, holy feasts, or Sabbath for Gentiles? Hate to break it to ya bud, but... Exodus 12:19, 48-49, Exodus 20:10, Leviticus 18:26, Leviticus 19:34, Numbers 15:14, 16, Deuteronomy 5:14, among others tells a very different story. Ah but most mainstream Christians read the New Testament while often neglecting the Tanakh/Old Testament.

[@digimike8]

@@siervodedios5952 If gentiles were to do these things it would have been covered in Acts 15. Pretty clear Gentiles have always been treated differently by God even has different food laws in your Torah.

[@digimike8]

@scented-leafpelargonium3366 The red letters of Yeshua make it clear on the dietary subject, once a law but no longer. What else could this mean? Mark 7: 14-23 There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.” And he called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand: And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, theft, murder, adultery, And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. coveting, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, envy, slander, pride, foolishness. All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.” We're I'm a new covenant now with Yeshua. Isreal broke the old aka Mosaic Covenant.

[@tbishop4961]

Most of these teachers leave off the levitical punishment for bacon cheeseburgers.. "unless thou art thoroughly stoned at 2am" which in hindsight may not be a punishment 🤔

[@jaylar6442]

Did you really just cite WebMD as a medical case for pork? Because I'm pretty sure I have at least one terminal disease based on the symptoms I've typed into that website. It's probably best to stick with Scripture, at least to start. Just saying.

[@jamiea.thompson2050]

Thank you! Jewish roots are going a step further saying that we as Christians are Israel and therefore we should keep the laws. Check out “who are we ? Called out. By olive branch 🤪

[@luiscajigas5567]

what are you called?

[@aProdigalSonReturned]

Yeah, and there are some Jewish writers saying the same kinds of things. Check out "New Testament" the second chapter of Ephesians by Paul. Oh, and Romans 11. And that Peter dude was saying that we are a peculiar, holy Nation and he backs up Ephesians 2 by quoting Hosea from that Old Testathingy. Good thing we know better as gentiles. Uh, the nations part of gentiles; not the heathen part.

[@luiscajigas5567]

@@aProdigalSonReturned So, are you associating yourself with the commonwealth of Israel, or are you developing your own group of people?

[@aProdigalSonReturned]

@@luiscajigas5567 It would be hard to fully explain it in a comment, as it's backed up by a whole lot of scripture. But essentially, yes. I am adopted into Israel by the blood of Jesus. Grafted in, as per Romans 11. Once was a gentile, but not anymore as per Ephesians 2. God only has one people, and that is Israel. They have had their ups and downs and have been divided, but prophecy says they will all be brought back into one group. Possibly still with tribes because of how New Jerusalem is laid out. 12 gates with names of tribes. If you want to research the Word for yourself, a good place to start is Ahijah the prophet. Follow through Jeroboam's rebellion, and on to Jeremiah 3 where the House of Israel is divorced. Check out the divorce laws over in Deut. 24, and keep that in mind next time you read Romans 7. There is much more, such as Abraham's seed not being simply descendants. Isaiah chapter 56. The list goes on. Peter wrote to the strangers scattered (House of Israel), calling them the same titles that God called Israel. He references Hosea. Hosea is all about this topic. The House of Israel being divorced, but being able to return in the end. It's literally all over the Bible. Gentiles means nations. We are in the world, but are we supposed to be of the world? Gentiles is sometimes translated as heathen, as well. And just to be clear, this isn't replacement, but adoption. Judah is my brother, and he remained in Covenant until Messiah came. When Messiah died, Judah was widowed; however, he can enter into the New Covenant just as we can. Through Obedience, and Faith. We should obey God, rather than men. He who said you should not murder; is He not the same that said keep the Sabbath Holy? Did He not also give commands regarding food? Solomon concludes that everything we do is vain except obedience to God. While he failed at some point, it doesn't make his conclusion any less true. Sorry I got off of topic, but it's all interconnected.

[@luiscajigas5567]

@@aProdigalSonReturned so, you in agreement with scripture or with Rob, distorted view?

[@Nogames2281]

God would be more upset if you waste food. What if it was eat pork or die?? My god will forgive me..waste is a sin🤗🤗🤗

[@judemichaelvelez6789]

Good day Dr. Solberg. Like to request an indepth scriptural exposition on the "10 lost tribes of Israel", coz i bro.is a torahist and this is his go to arguement in dealing that he is not a gentile but is one of the lost tribes of Israel therefore is a Jew therefor obligated to follow the torah not unto salvation but as an expression of his love for God yet eating pork will send u to hell. Thanks and shalom

[@scottmoran9338]

The lost tribes were not Jews, The Jews, the house of Judah are the 2 tribes who stayed in the southern kingdom. The 10 tribes are the lost sheep of the house of Isreal, the northern kingdom. We see clues such as people of the nations travelling back to Jerusalem for the feast of weeks / Pentecost It is highly wrong to think Jews means all those who were at Sinai. It’s also wrong to think all Jews followed, the additional rules and regulations we see today in Jewish culture, these were just the sect of the Pharisees.

[@sundownsam3369]

Rob Solberg, my question to you: If God called the pig an unclean animal and instructed his people to abstain from eating its meat, if one ate pork, would you agree that they were disobedient to God's law and if so, they sinned against God? Yes or no? Now, we both know that Yeshua only spoke that which he heard from his Father, with this being said, did his Father changed his mind or did Yeshua spoke on his own if he said: "Now you can eat unclean animals?" Previously, I responded to you on this topic in one of your videos. But I understand that theologians think they are the answers to the questions that are being asked and the statement that is being made. Your followers are starting to realize that all you do is repeat the same thing over and over, which is why your followers are fading, the grass that you are regurgitating, they are tired of feeding on it. You are going to find yourself as the only person in the grass field and I am not being malicious in what I am saying. Rob Solberg I want you to think about what I told you many times and take this seriously. Nietzsche, an atheist, suffered a mental breakdown; a man who was trying to prove that God did not exist died without God in his mind. If you continue to aggressively attack God's laws, you might one day die lawless. Learn from Nietzsche. I encourage you to read Romans 1. As for christopher enoch, I can't say much about him because I do not know what he believes.

[@salpezzino7803]

God also declared pig Good. We don't see any pig eating restrictions till Mount Sinai. I also wonder how you figured out Believers shouldn't eat pig, and Jesus's Bride missed it for 2000yrs? Seems NutZ

[@kennethknott9138]

Sam - (this is the same response as I gave to Scott prior): consider that God told Noah in Gen: 9:3 that ALL creeping things were good for food, when prior they were not (only green herbs were permitted). If you want to advocate that God was only talking about clean animals, then you must be hermeneutically consistent with the first part of the chapter and the rest of the chapter, which would lead to the very awkward conclusion that only clean animals would have the fear of man (verse 2) and that God's covenant would only be with clean animals (verses 10-11). Of course, that just doesn't make sense. It's much more logical to interpret just as it reads, that God made ALL animals food for Noah and his descendants, and that the fear of man was upon ALL animals and that AlLL animals were part of the covenant. So yes, Noah could eat a rabbit or a snake if he wanted to. You cited in a previous post that eating unclean animals would make them extinct because there only one pair on the ark. Torah observers seem to love to cite that argument as a "gotcha" moment, when really there is no gotcha at all. For starters, Noah's family could certainly do the math - they could have deferred to preserve a species until it repopulated, so your problem is solved. Or, they could have eaten an unclean animal right away, such that it had no chance to populate - in which case, so what? Face it- Noah and his family could eat all living things. That is what the text says. It was not until Moses that the Law was given to the Israelites stating otherwise.

[@endtimesnowwithjohnnybargo3028]

Did God change His mind on the yearly sacrifices of the animal for the temporal forgiveness of sins? Did He change His mind on stoning? "I will make a covenant "NOT" like the covenant I made with their father's".. not like means some things are gonna be different.. there was a change in the priesthood, by necessity there must be a change in the law (Hebrews 7:11-12)

[@sundownsam3369]

@@salpezzino7803 You are ignorant of scriptural truth. Tell me, prior to Genesis 9, did God say unto Noah: Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female; and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female? If yes, then you would have to admit that there were unclean animals prior to the flood, which makes it clear that you cannot analyze grammatically what Genesis 9 is saying, unless you believe that they became clean after the flood, and if so, why would God give laws of the clean and unclean? If God said to abstain from unclean animals, that would mean that they were always unclean. Tell me, what does unclean mean to you in Genesis 7:2? You probably would avoid answering this question. In brief, prior to God giving Israel the laws of what animals to abstain from, God told Israel that if any soul touched any unclean thing, whether it be a carcase of an unclean beast or a carcase of unclean cattle, etc., he also would be unclean and guilty (Leviticus 5:2). So, if he called it unclean, now one can understand why he gave laws about what animals to abstain from. The law also taught them how to distinguish between clean and unclean animals. I am not here to change your mind; I am here to put on the table what God made clear the first time he spoke. If you want to continue eating pork, shrimp, or any other unclean animal, go ahead and indulge yourself in it.

[@sundownsam3369]

@@endtimesnowwithjohnnybargo3028 You are ignorant of scriptural truth. Read my past posts to Rob Solberg, and you will have your response. Now he understands that the command that God gave regarding the priesthood has nothing to do with God's laws being dismissed. You have been engraved with the lie that God's laws are done away with.

[@Pverb623]

Do you believe in the oral Torah professor…….? A Christian cannot perform things like Shechita……..you must be a Jew. Deuteronomy 12:21 If the place which the Lord thy God hath chosen to put His name there be too far from thee, then thou shalt kill of thy herd and of thy flock which the Lord hath given thee, as I have commanded thee, and thou shalt eat in thy gates whatsoever thy soul lusteth after. Please give the verse(s) that explains Shechita……. A pig professor cannot be killed kosherly………learn the anatomy of the animals……….the artery in the neck…….look up the difference from kosher animals and non-kosher….. Leviticus 11:7 And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you. Deuteronomy 14:8 8 And the swine, because it divideth the hoof, yet cheweth not the cud, it is unclean unto you: ye shall not eat of their flesh, nor touch their dead carcase. Isaiah 65:4 Which remain among the graves, and lodge in the monuments, which eat swine's flesh, and broth of abominable things is in their vessels; Isaiah 66:17 They that sanctify themselves, and purify themselves in the gardens behind one tree in the midst, eating swine's flesh, and the abomination, and the mouse, shall be consumed together, saith the LORD. Isaiah 66:3 He that killeth an ox is as if he slew a man; he that sacrificeth a lamb, as if he cut off a dog's neck; he that offereth an oblation, as if he offered swine's blood; he that burneth incense, as if he blessed an idol. Yea, they have chosen their own ways, and their soul delighteth in their abominations. Proverbs 11:22 As a jewel of gold in a swine's snout, so is a fair woman which is without discretion. God says don’t….don’t……yet this wasn’t given to the Christians , so why is this even an argument. Daniel 10:3 I ate no choice food; no meat or wine touched my lips; and I used no lotions at all until the three weeks were over. Daniel 1:8 But Daniel was determined not to defile himself by eating the food and wine given to them by the king. He asked the chief of staff for permission not to eat these unacceptable foods. Now God had caused the official to show favor and compassion to Daniel, but the official told Daniel, “I am afraid of my lord the king, who has assigned your food and drink. Why should he see you looking worse than the other young men your age? The king would then have my head because of you.” Daniel 1:12-17 “Please test your servants for ten days: Give us nothing but vegetables to eat and water to drink. Then compare our appearance with that of the young men who eat the royal food, and treat your servants in accordance with what you see.” So he agreed to this and tested them for ten days. At the end of the ten days they looked healthier and better nourished than any of the young men who ate the royal food. God gave these four young men an unusual aptitude for understanding every aspect of literature and wisdom. And God gave Daniel the special ability to interpret the meanings of visions and dreams. So eating kosher foods allowed them to have more insight and Godly knowledge….. Psalms 119:98 Your commandments make me wiser than my enemies, for they are always with me.

[@billyhw99]

Why did you post 20,000 pages of copy-paste bible verse spam in the combox? Why can't you interact with people like a normal human being?

[@Pverb623]

@@billyhw99 20,000 ….cute Tells me you didn’t read it….. Torah says we are to give the source……and if that source is always the Torah/Tanakh……..then my opinion doesn’t matter, what is Gods opinion. Normal should be that pride shouldn’t between us……but seeking to know more about God. I can provide the scriptural proofs of Torah’s arguments……that contradicts the NT……. Why do Christian’s always attack another character…….the story of Jacob wrestling with (Esau) (Satan) the Angel struck Israel’s hip, because he could not defeat Jacobs Torah knowledge. The US is Edom…………The quarreling brothers……oldest allies. Hosea 12:3 In the womb he grasped his brother’s heel; as a man he struggled with God. Genesis 32:24 So Jacob was left all alone, and there a man wrestled with him until daybreak. Genesis 32:28 Then the man said, "Your name will no longer be Jacob, but Israel, because you have struggled with God and with men, and you have prevailed." Genesis 25:23: And the Lord said to her: Two nations are in your womb; two peoples will come from you and be separated. One people will be stronger than the other, and the older will serve the younger. Now normal human being….what would you like to talk about….?

[@Pverb623]

@@billyhw99 I use the copy and past, one because I know the content….it’s quicker this way instead of typing it all out…. Second I use the Christian translation to show that I am not making up verses…..it in there book……they just have to read to verify what is being spoken.

[@notinfluencedbywindsofshif8120]

Solberg you said: Wouldn't you think that Jesus would of told us at least once to avoid pork, and he never did! But wouldn't you think that Jesus would of said you can now eat pork at least once? BUT, he never did!

[@billyhw99]

Jesus declared all foods clean and Prof Solberg quoted the relevant verse from Mark.

[@digimike8]

The character of God in Genesis and Job reveals God’s heart and all 10 commandments are in Genesis and Job. Only the 10 Commandments written on stone by the figure of God were put in the (Ark of the Covenant Law, NIV translation). This Ark is a copy of what is in Heaven, The other Mosaic Laws were in a book set beside the Ark of Covenant Law. The book of Mosaic Laws were only for the stiff necked humans of Israel. They pointed to a need of a Messiah. The 603 Mosaic Laws started ending when Jesus was Baptized, then crucified as the final blood sacrifice on the cross and ended completely when the temple was destroyed. You yourself know the Levitical Priesthood and Temple are gone no more, fulfilled and ended. The 10 Commandants in the Ark of Covenant Law are eternal, they existed before God wrote them on the tablets of stone. The real Ark of Covenant Law is seen in Revelations 11:19. What’s not seen in this vision? The book of Mosaic Laws. Why because the Mosaic Law was completed by Jesus Christ. The Charter of God has never changed; his eternal commands/laws have never changed only how he has interacted with us humans. Open your heart up to real truth. Open your eyes to the bigger picture of God’s simple gospel, Love.

[@notinfluencedbywindsofshif8120]

@@billyhw99 Did Jesus specifically say that all unclean category of LEVITICUS 11 and Deuteronomy 14 are now clean and that you can now eat pork. No he did not! Mark 7 true context is not about the unclean category of LEVITICUS 11 and Deuteronomy 14, neither is Bread!

[@salpezzino7803]

@@notinfluencedbywindsofshif8120 May I respectfully ask, Do you believe that for these last 2000yeara that not a Single man of God understood the Scriptures you just quoted? And that Jesus sat around and watched His Bride eat pork until the Millerites or even today's Hebrew Roots teachers discovered this new truth?

[@notinfluencedbywindsofshif8120]

@@digimike8 Love includes loving God to the point of obedience to all his ways. That's the example of one of the tablets of the two tablets and 5 of the ten commandments is focused on loving God. I fully understand the other 5 are focused on loving your neighbors. The reason the instructional writings of the Torah were left on the outside for men to learn the instructions directly by God. Like you said the Israelites were hardheaded and did not follow the instructions of the Creator that's why the gift to the Gentiles to come to the Torah and show the Israelites how listening to God is done, by fully loving God in obedience to all his instructions. P.S: there is not 613 laws. That's misinformation of what the Torah teaches!

[@reanmouton8413]

I can't watch even just 5min of your teaching any longer. I start to get so angry in my heart, that I have to stop. You really have to STOP with your false teachings. I mean, just your sentence: "the new covenant teaches that Christians can eat anything they want" - WHAT THE HELL BRO!!!!!!!!!!!! Where do you get this from??? PLEASE, stop with these videos. You are breaking the Father's heart.

[@TheBiblicalRoots]

Bless you for continually watching my videos despite the personal angst they cause you, Réan. The sentence you cited comes from Mark 7:14-23, Romans 14:14-17, Acts 15:1-29, 1 Corinthians 10:23-30, plus the fact that no one is commanded to eat kosher anywhere in the NT. Blessings, Rob

[@billyhw99]

I know it's scary for the first time, but you need to take off those training wheels.

[@reanmouton8413]

@@TheBiblicalRoots and that's your biggest issue: You think/read the scriptures in terms of "Testaments" - a man-made concept. PS - Yeshua did command them to 'eat kosher'. See Matt 23:1-3 1 Then Jesus spoke to the crowds and to His disciples, 2 saying: “The scribes and the Pharisees have seated themselves in the chair of Moses; 3 therefore all that they tell you, do and observe, but do not do according to their deeds; for they say things and do not do them. This sounds like Jesus referred to (your favourite saying) Law of Moses and He instructed them to DO and OBSERVE it all, which includes eating clean. Slowly step away from that ham sandwich please....

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

@@TheBiblicalRoots Christians are quick to quote Leviticus 18:22 about the abomination of homosexuality, Yet they never quote Leviticus 11, Deut 14 about the abomination of eating unclean, Hmm., Christians just love their Bacon more than they love God.

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

@@TheBiblicalRoots The Holy Spirit just hasn't opened your understanding of Scripture yet Rob and right now you teach false doctrine, But I won't slander you instead I'll pray the Holy Spirit shows leads you to the truth. You're like the Pharisees and you make up your own Doctrine.

[@Jeffmacaroni1542]

The Holy Spirit just hasn't opened your understanding of Scripture yet Rob and right now you teach false doctrine, But I won't slander you instead I'll pray the Holy Spirit shows leads you to the truth. You're like the Pharisees and you make up your own Doctrine.

[@scottmoran9338]

If we live for God, then there is no need to try and justify what God says through science. What God says should be enough For me I want to walk as a representation of our father, to walk in his image as we were created to be. So I eat what God says is food, and I stay away from what he says is not. For yes the bible says all food is clean, but not all meat/flesh is classed as food. For just because it can be eaten, does not mean it is classified as food. Take human flesh for example….almost everyone would agree it is not good, yet there are slim minority that would eat it and claim it as food. And I see nowhere when read in context, that says God has reclassified pork, shrimp etc as food. On another note, when the bible refers to Gentiles, it generally refers to the 10 lost tribes who were spread across the nations. All who were part of Isreal and also given the law too at Mount Sinai

[@salpezzino7803]

I wonder if those at Mount Sinai said the same thing you did, 'God why are reclassifying pork and shrimp ..... '

[@scottmoran9338]

@@salpezzino7803 I believe it was a reminder to those who had forgotten Gods ways, for we know God classed certain animals as clean and unclean for Noah took 7 clean animals, yet only 2 unclean of each breed. And if Noah had eaten the unclean, then that bread would have been gone forever as would not be able to mate and reproduce.

[@salpezzino7803]

@@scottmoran9338 Noah didn't eat animals only plants and seeds. God Commanded to do so before and after the Fall. So he wouldn't have taken them for food. They were for sacrifices. The Flood destroyed the plants So, we see God telling Noah he can eat all moving things as I gave you plants. There were fish in the water. Abram was a Gentile he also could have eaten Pig.

[@billyhw99]

@@scottmoran9338 How does bread mate? Like with bacon, lettuce and tomato in a sandwich?

[@scottmoran9338]

@@billyhw99 not with bacon….. bread is far too clean for that

[@HAChrist]

"Thus, He declared all foods clean" It would have to read, "Thus, He declared all non-foods clean". Thus, proving, that only clean foods are still clean. Eating human meat, fecal matter, pork, etc. will always be unclean. Neither meat, fecal matter, pork, etc. was never considered food. This video is an example of rebellion against the Kingdom of Heaven and of its Instructions. Rebellion will not allow you to enter the Kingdom of Heaven but obedience to His Instructions. In order to Love your Brother (JEW) stop eating non-foods that are recorded in a Holy Book as unclean and an abomination.

[@billyhw99]

This is the most demented line of argument I have ever encountered on the internet. Well done. Surely there must be a prize for that.

[@HAChrist]

@@billyhw99 That is why, your inheritance is damnation! You are only looking into a mirror; thus, you speak unto yourself. Your comment is a sign of the reprobate mind!! I've had conversations with reprobates like yourself, who've admitted to me that eating human meat is acceptable, who proclaim their love for JESUS. Therefore, your prize will be 'damnation' be rest assured!

[@salpezzino7803]

Wasn't Pig food for the Gentiles? God can make Gentiles Clean Yet He can't make Spare Ribs and Shrimp 🦐 Clean? You serve a weak tiny god

[@HAChrist]

@@salpezzino7803 You're not clean by belief, but by consecration and sanctification, which you understand of neither one, or else you wouldn't have made that stupid comment. Consecration and sanctification are actions that must be taken by the individual, not mental ascent of belief.

[@HAChrist]

@@salpezzino7803 No, all descendants are from Noah, who knew the difference between clean and unclean, which is why they were two different groups entering the ark (7 pairs clean and 2 unclean). After the flood, if Noah had sacrificed or eaten the pigs, (qty.2) they would be extinct. All humankind were expected to not eat both the blood and avoid eating unclean animals, birds, fish, and insects. Witches and the evil world utilize the unclean for their potions, witchcraft and covenant meals. Flee Babylon and the Whore!

[@rayray4192]

They are not my friends Rob. They are disgusting judges