Never had I been so relieved that the Chieftain knows how to use a belt.
@bigblue69175 сағат бұрын
There are some sights you don't want to see on an empty stomach. Or a full one for that matter.
@thhseekingСағат бұрын
We almost got a look into Mordor - "The Crack of Doom" 🤣
@HarryFlashmanVC6 сағат бұрын
You suffer for your art, Nick and we do appreciate it. 😊
@rgfrank16685 сағат бұрын
I would like to say from the 'KZbin community' that we appreciate you for enduring the pain of stretching, banging and other physical activity's in armored fighting vehicles. It is interesting but to a degree also funny to see you struggling in such old vehicles and it gives a real sense of perspective. So while the phrase above was said in jest, I actually mean the overall message.
@BeyondTheGrave845 сағат бұрын
The radio device inside the vehicle is a Finnish produced portable radio called "Kukkopilli". They were designed to be used by on-site radio reporters at the 1940 Helsinki Olympics, but the games were cancelled because of the war. The radios that had been produced were issued to the Finnish Army and many of them were put inside captured armoured cars and tanks in order to provide radios for communication. Unfortunately, Kukkopilli radios were not suitable for that role, as their signal barely made out of the fully armoured vehicles nor could they receive any signals efficiently. After the 1941 battles they were recalled and used in other roles during the war. Oh and if you wonder why this car has Finnish swastikas on the mud guards like that, it is because the guys who painted them originally at the front during the war used some "artistic freedoms" when situating them. The official Finnish swastika stands and is not tilted that way. Later in 1942 we adopted the shortened swastika to separate our forces from the Germans.
@andersjjensen2 сағат бұрын
Ah, thanks! I was hella confused as to why a Soviet car would have Wehrmacht markings.
@johnfrench12396 сағат бұрын
It felt agonisingly claustrophobic even watching you. Thanks as ever for the great content.
@xcalibertrekker66936 сағат бұрын
Hope you never need an MRI. He is a pretty large guy though so he makes it look even worse.
@18robsmith5 сағат бұрын
@@xcalibertrekker6693 I think an MRI machine looks far preferable to that, after all the MRI is open at both ends (even if one's dignity is exposed)
@xcalibertrekker66935 сағат бұрын
@@18robsmith Well I have had several and have never had my dignity exposed before but maybe it was a bad comparison since most people have never had one.
@hideshisface18867 сағат бұрын
This looks like... with many soviet vehicles, it was made for far shorter people than the Chieftain.
@antcommander13676 сағат бұрын
looks like chieftain doing tank yoga again...
@bigblue69175 сағат бұрын
They were much shorter back then. The only upside to a Soviet famine.
@lavrentivs98915 сағат бұрын
Most vehicles are made for people shorter than the Chieftain, and people are in general shorter than the Chieftain, especially back in the 1930's and -40's (and not only in the USSR).
@RJLbwb3 сағат бұрын
And this is what we come to see.
@earlthepearl39223 сағат бұрын
And far younger.
@bernardlyons24226 сағат бұрын
I visited that museum last July. Highly recommended.
@soupwizardСағат бұрын
16:48 That was a very cinematic video shot, eyes peeking out, looking around for... something, anything!
@Dennys8542 сағат бұрын
That padded hatch with the pop up and Chieftain's Eyes reminded me of the Bugs Bunny What's Opera Doc with Elmer Fudd and his Magic Hewmit. Even to the point of sounding like Fudd... "Wailway Wheels? WAILway Weels? WailWAY WEELS?"
@mathiasvernet7636 сағат бұрын
The russian Wikipedia (not the best source, i know) mentions the presence of an extra 30 liter fuel tank on the BA-20M (compared to the BA-20), so i'd assume the port at the rear is the filling port for that extra tank that is probably missing on this particular vehicle
@than3572 сағат бұрын
Plus that would put weight on the rear wheels
@TheArklyte7 сағат бұрын
The story of soviet armored cars is a VERY weird one considering the background of tens of thousands light tanks produced and simultaneous consistent failures to develop domestic APCs(both due to problems with engines and with halftrack suspension). One could feel that they would have been better off delegating the armored car niche to BT-5/7 variant or concentrate effort on creating APC that can double up as filler for roles of these armored cars. BA-13(if I recall the name of 45mm armed one right) is especially egregious example of a questionable niche. P.S.: Komsomolets was an artillery tractor, not APC. It sadly provided no protection for the dismounts. Had it been wider or used T-26 chassis then maybe there would have been space to add side armor and get their own Universal Carrier. But, again, reality didn't turn out that way:(
@robertalaverdov81476 сағат бұрын
The thing is it made sense at the time and still kind of does. The Soviet Union was a vast country that needed a big army to defend its borders. Having had experienced ww1 and the Russian civil war, they realized the potential of the tank and armored vehicles. But they couldn't just build enough tanks for all their divisions. So they decided to build much cheaper armored cars in parallel to the light tanks. This way even the most basic rifle divisions could have some sort of armor elements. And they equipped them with bigger 37mm&45mm guns which were more suited to fighting the tanks of that time as well as machine gun nests and pillboxes. As apposed to light and heavy machine guns seen in other countries, which are more suited against infantry or trucks. Yes the armor could barely stop machine gun rounds and was useless against cannons. But the T-26 and BT tanks could also be knocked out in one shot. As well as most tanks in the 1930's. It was a sensible decision based on their limited resources.
@HappyDuude4 сағат бұрын
Those LED strip lights do a great job, would be handy to have for many tank interiors!
@ArchImperatrix6 сағат бұрын
"Warthog type ... Not a Puma."💯🙏👌
@bluehairedgirlstudio6 сағат бұрын
And certainly not a walrus...
@confuseatronica5 сағат бұрын
stop making up animals!
@Penguinius5 сағат бұрын
The record scratch double take of "Did i just hear that" was perfect
@Sm00k4 сағат бұрын
@@Penguinius Oh, I wasn't the only one then.
@Erdanya4 сағат бұрын
@@bluehairedgirlstudio Dangit, didn't I tell you to stop making up animals?
@neilwilson57855 сағат бұрын
Looks like a fantastic museum!
@samzala4 сағат бұрын
I had wanted to clamber in when I saw the door open when I went to the museum. Seeing entrance and exit here, I'm glad I didn't bother trying!
@18robsmith6 сағат бұрын
My father called mechanical drum brakes "maniacal drum brakes", due primarily to the maniacal laughter one emitted when faced with having to use them when going down ANY hill...
@andersjjensenСағат бұрын
So "gearbox and somewhat foot assisted breaking"....
@TheRedruffianСағат бұрын
After driving it once, my father compared the (hydraulic but poor) brakes on my early Morris Minor to his memories of 1930s cars. "Effect of applying brakes? FRNs. Faint Rubbing Noises".
@seanmosley5834Сағат бұрын
I worked on one back in the day and if you don't keep them adjusted good luck stopping the thing
@maxcleveland344640 минут бұрын
As Ford put it in their sales brochures of the time; " The safety of steel, from pedal to wheel". None of that new-fangled hydraulic stuff.
@kanamisprs43306 сағат бұрын
Never in my life have I experienced claustrophobia watching a video until today.
@naamadossantossilva47365 сағат бұрын
Have you seen any caving accident video?
@kanamisprs43305 сағат бұрын
@@naamadossantossilva4736 Strange as it may seem cave diving video's don't make me feel that way. Those are more of a "Why would you do that? Why? Are you insane?" kinda vibe.
@robertcuny9343 сағат бұрын
Judging from Forgotten Weapons videos, The Chieftan videos and Kamerastore, Finland must be a very interesting place to visit.
@davidotts72172 минут бұрын
Thanks! Love what you do and your sense of humor. Keep up the good work.
@stanislavczebinski9946 сағат бұрын
The air vent on top of the engine bay works probably very well - as cold air can enter in the front, below the radiator. Hot air raises up - and gets pushed out by the cold air. Additionally - the draft over the hood pulls it away. Mechanical drum brakes were the state of technology back then. Hydraulic brakes existed - but were still very unreliable as they were prone to leaks. Henry Ford called the former: "The power of steel - from pedal to wheel". Emergency braking wasn't so much of a thing yet. There were still plenty of horsecars around - which were almost impossible to stop if the horses went wild. A brake back then had the task to slowly decelerate the vehicle - not stop on a dime. Therefore - it was the pedestrians task to clear the road in time.
@bigdiccmarty933546 минут бұрын
I love the loose cartridges on the floor, very true to life
@davidolie83929 минут бұрын
These were often used for liaison work which is why there is space for a third person next to the driver.
@elgenvalcin68855 сағат бұрын
"Donating to their enemy" shots fired🤣🤣🤣
@faeembrugh6 сағат бұрын
Tankies in the British Army always tend to be on the short side (Paras as well for some reason). On the other hand, I knew a Dutch guy who was 6' 7'' and was told he didn't have to do national service as they didn't have boots in his size!
@1aapmens5 сағат бұрын
I seem to remember that the Dutch army didn't have helmets over size 63 either. So big giant heads were excused as well.
@mikkoolavijarvinen36532 сағат бұрын
The tallest Finn ever Väinö Myllyrinne did serve in army (he was 224 cm 7or ft 4 in during the service but grew afterwards because apparently growth works strangle on these very tall individuals) , his uniform and other is on display in the Artillery Museum in Hämeenlinna city center, i.e. very close to this one.
@JeffKogut2 сағат бұрын
Would love to see a video on the 8x8 Spahpanzer Luchs. Also, any post-war Japanese armor!
@Maple_Cadian6 сағат бұрын
I want the BA-10 beside the 20M now.
@johnsteiner34176 сағат бұрын
Jolly Green Giant crawling through the Lilliputian-mobile. 😁
@johnford15753 сағат бұрын
Another episode of does The Chieftain fit.
@ptonpc6 сағат бұрын
One of the few vehicles where you looked like you were about to have a panic or claustrophobia attack. I suppose if you were a soviet soldier at the time and told to get in it, you got in it. Refusing would not really be an option. The thing is, you can see moments of brilliance in its construction mixed in with soviet thinking.
@mattheweagle223Сағат бұрын
Wow I thought this channel had died away. Great to see you again!
@TheChieftainsHatchСағат бұрын
I've been on average releasing every other week. You might need to do some catching up!
@mattheweagle223Сағат бұрын
@TheChieftainsHatch aye, youtube did NOT keep you in my feed. I haven't played WoT for years so I kinda forgot about ya!
@01bdbark4 сағат бұрын
I don't want to be a know it all but, that alternator is actually a generator. most vehicles from that era used generators. This difference visually is a generator is housed as that one is in a long steel tube, and the alternator is a short aluminum cage. Generators use a voltage regulator to keep from over charging the battery and also give of EMF that can interfere with the radio. I've only own two cars in my life with generators. So they almost predate me. I hope this is informative.
@TheChieftainsHatch4 сағат бұрын
I sit educated
@anthonyjackson280Сағат бұрын
I would say all vehicles of that era. Alternators require electronic rectifiers that did not exist in a suitable form.
@samifyrqvist2586 сағат бұрын
I hope you do a T26 and also one of the KV-1s. And also the T-50, since these last two are so rare :)
@monostripeexplosiveexplora23745 сағат бұрын
1:13 "but this is gonna be fairly short..." YEAH.. only because there is no track tensioning.. we know.. we know..
@SnEaKyGiTau48 минут бұрын
great insight into the interior challenges & terminology difficulties! :) , would love to see one on the inside of the big sister next door the BA-10
@mark950-d7d6 сағат бұрын
The fire wall between the engine and the crew compartment appears to be standard civilian issue. It appears that it was only able to only handle unarmed civilians who do not have Molotov cocktails.
@kettujabamiesukkeliukko6 сағат бұрын
People were smaller back then. Like tankers in soviet tanks are small, no wonder you struggled to enter/move around/exit that thing.
@barelyasurvivor1257Сағат бұрын
Thanks for another interesting video.
@Rom3_292 сағат бұрын
Those large Finnish swastikas make that truck look like movie prop from Charlie Chaplain Dictator movie.
@Colinpark2 сағат бұрын
I get the impression that using the radio antenna as a handle was verboten.
@HypoceeYTСағат бұрын
Had an interaction with the guy on the screen in this one. "OK, I'm inside." Are you really though, Nick? "...No I ain't."
@justjeff15066 сағат бұрын
I wonder if the driver and passenger side windshield armor were switched. Also, the company owner at my last job had a bunch of early 20th century cars and I always found it easier to get in and out through the passenger side.
@fredhogg4361Сағат бұрын
Delivered with a bare minimum of contractually obliged enthusiasm whilst deeply regretting committing to the Finnish expedition
@cmck4724 сағат бұрын
No mention of the spent brass lying around inside...
@charlie156272 сағат бұрын
I bet they used a spent shell casing to keep the top hatch cracked open. You'd have plenty of them around, it'd keep it open less than a half inch, just enough to see around, without opening it enough for an easy shot to enter the vehicle.
@kevchink6 сағат бұрын
Yay, I love armored cars, especially these old school Interwar/WWII ones that retain the silhouette of normal passenger cars.
@antlamaki11085 сағат бұрын
By the way Ford built the whole GAZ-factory to SSSR and sold unlimited licence for Ford AA and Ford B-model, so those components weren't actually copies. Henry J. thou felt some regrets about it later, his mention was to affect and make better soviet system like inside. After his own words at least.
@gordonfraser80203 сағат бұрын
Being a BA20M this is an improved version? Methinks the Elbonians might be interested.
@andersjjensenСағат бұрын
Yes... this is the improved version... I haven't seen the base version up close, but I can't for the love of me figure out what is improved in this one....
@michaelbourgeault94093 сағат бұрын
Looks all right, Colonel, but where is the chrome?
@Masada19112 сағат бұрын
This vehicle does seem to be lacking in chrome
@adrielcamilo25647 сағат бұрын
Plz do a T26!
@MrHws5mp6 сағат бұрын
Could it be that the vision plate in front of the driver with the low slot is simply mounted upside-down? The bolts on the brackets look like they might be vertically symmetrical.
@CTAJIEBAP6 сағат бұрын
Or they just swapped them accidentally during restoration process and the driver's one ended up on the door.
@anaphylastiks3 сағат бұрын
" I guess it beats getting shot in the face ". 😂 Made my Day Mr Sir
@B9oyd5 сағат бұрын
6:25 Warthog? Now you're just makin' up animals!
@davidhansen50674 сағат бұрын
I'm telling you, man, it sure looks like a puma.
@brosefmalkovitch31212 сағат бұрын
Man, imagine having to get in and out of that thing wearing any kind of kit whatsoever! Ergonomics have come a long way since the 30s.
@andersjjensenСағат бұрын
Imagine trying to get out of this in a hurry because the Finns got a couple of Molotov cocktails on target.....
@jaysherman26152 сағат бұрын
The one vehicle I want in this series is the total nonsense of the T-35 heavy tank in Kubinka. It is a mess and I love it.
@TheChieftainsHatchСағат бұрын
It'll be a very long time before I'm back in Kubinka, I suspect
@AlarmingVirus4 сағат бұрын
ww2 vehicles really give you appreciation for the modern stuff.
@RRD-ye6edСағат бұрын
I just recently picked up a mosin nagant that was donated to the fins as well during that same time period 😂
@anaphylastiks3 сағат бұрын
Nothing wrong with being short. I can move through the bush like a cat
@allanlarrett60154 сағат бұрын
Thanks!
@TheChieftainsHatchСағат бұрын
I appreciate that
@Tankdestryer16 сағат бұрын
would you work with LMM in Britain to do an armored train? also wonderful video!
@jon-paulfilkins78205 сағат бұрын
Is there still a replica of the one that ran on the Romney, Hythe and Dymchurch railway about, that would be a 'fun' one... (for those not in the know, Its a 'miniature/small gauge railway, an armored train was built in WW2 for patrols along the 15 miles of so of coast the line runs across, armed with machine guns and an anti-tank rifle).
@naamadossantossilva47365 сағат бұрын
Whoever went into battle in this is not just braver,he is also shorter.That looked cramped AF.
@anaphylastiks3 сағат бұрын
I call them hoodbonnets. Like clipmags
@mavvh10546 сағат бұрын
I use you as a metric for whether or not Ill fit in a vehicle... not that I would ever need this information, but Id rather have it and not need it.
@ImRuined6662 сағат бұрын
What's the armoured car to the left with the 37mm (?) turret? Would be curious to see a Chieftain's Hatch on that one, too...
@V_Gert2 сағат бұрын
Nice RvB reference
@stanislavczebinski9946 сағат бұрын
7:40 "The smallest air filters I've ever come across" - the air filter (singular) is that can-shaped object on the lower left side. It's an updraft-type carb. I think you mean the priming cups. To get this thing running when cold - you pour some fuel into them. I'm just wondering what that modern part on the low right is. Any ideas?
@banaana12345 сағат бұрын
The thing bolted next to the carb with fuel lines? It seems bolted to the crank case and looks like one so mechanical fuel pump most likely.
@CobraDBlade4 сағат бұрын
It's possible that the vision slits for the driver aren't at the correct height because the armored panels accidentally got swapped left-to-right during the restoration process as well. That is if the vehicle was restored, there is an awful lot of crinkled sheet metal on it that makes that questionable.
@no1DdC2 сағат бұрын
It was restored (there's no way the paint is original), but it certainly wasn't restored well.
@andersjjensenСағат бұрын
@@no1DdC Bashed into shape (optional), some rust removed, some bog applied and painted with a brush.
@kennethkaczypenski62244 сағат бұрын
Man I do not see any man over five foot three manning that weapon system. BTW I am curious before you climb into one of those small tanks/APC's/jeeps ect...do you have the local fire rescue phone number on speed dial?
@johnfisk8117 сағат бұрын
So the Irish army was ahead of the game compared to the 1930 Soviets. Thank you for the video. I watched in mortal fear of builder’s bum but decorum was maintained.
@haldorasgirson94635 сағат бұрын
Perry suspenders are the bomb
@WildBillCox136 сағат бұрын
The rear of the BA-20M is strikingly similar to the front end of the Italian AB41*. *Bronnimat Avtomobilyah vs Autoblinda . . . Armored Car vs Car Armored . . . does syntax win wars?
@vicpecka73562 сағат бұрын
Are you going to do a Chieftain's Hatch on the BA-10?
@spamotron11786 сағат бұрын
Out of curiosity are you having any trouble with KZbin's image recognition bots hating a certain symbol causing videos to be demonitized?
@TheChieftainsHatch4 сағат бұрын
Hasn't hit me yet
@terrancelopez9631Сағат бұрын
"It's not a puma" Was that a Red vs Blue reference?
@DavidJohnson77383 сағат бұрын
Cars of that era had a generator not an alternator
@StratfordWingRider7 сағат бұрын
Greetings from New Zealand :)
@slateslavens3 сағат бұрын
Thanks Nick. Nice to have an object lesson in how _not_ to design an armored car. :D
@patrickporter186435 минут бұрын
A post on what would have happened if the usa had not provided lend lease to the ussr during the war. Would be interesting even if it just covered military vehicles and aircraft.
@stanislavczebinski9946 сағат бұрын
I doubt that thing in the very rear was a fuel tank. This was long before electric fuel pumps became common in cars. The front tank is higher than the engine - or at the same height. Carburettors don't neccessarily need a pump - they create enough draft in the fuel line due to how they work - to feed themselves. But I doubt they would be powerful enough to draw fuel all the way from the lower rear.
@jon-paulfilkins78205 сағат бұрын
I am looking at this and thinking, open that slit louvre, open the drivers vision ports, is that the heater?
@WildBillCox135 сағат бұрын
Attach by chains an infantry sled at the rear and you've got the Bradley's great grandpa.
@ROBERT-p5d8r5 сағат бұрын
In the Civil War, they mounted an MG on either a cart or sled pulled by two ponies ("Tachanka") en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachanka. Could have been towed by an armored car
@cedhome79457 сағат бұрын
Greetings from Devizes Wiltshire England 👍
@Zackary10054 сағат бұрын
Please do the ERC-90 Sagaie
@Teh0X5 сағат бұрын
BA-10M following soon? T-50 would be very interesting as well.
@TheWalterKurtzСағат бұрын
It almost like they were designed to be captured to foil the enemy.
@GARDENER426 сағат бұрын
I'm sure I saw one of those heading through Belgorod towards the front at Kursk last week...🙃
@michaelbourgeault94093 сағат бұрын
running boards are there for you and your driver to scrape the mud off your boots whilst you climb into the car.
@bongfuhrer5 сағат бұрын
Well, that is what the running board is for. To rest the foot you're not able to get inside the car..
@cheekibreeki46385 сағат бұрын
This seemed.... okay, til I saw the turret rotation mechanism. I don't know how thats better than letting it freely rotate.
@tfio78386 сағат бұрын
I wonder if the driver's shutter has just been installed upside down.🤔
@petesheppard17096 сағат бұрын
The driest, most dead-pan humor on KZbin!! 😁 Nick, you made it look like a kiddie car by just standing next to it. I suppose 30 years younger and a foot shorter would have made a difference.
@Marcus-ki1en6 сағат бұрын
Oh Bugger the... never mind, BBQ is up.
@HumbleDirtMerchant6 сағат бұрын
6:42 Spare pistol port.
@alm59924 сағат бұрын
Would this really be in the thick of battle? I thought they more of reconnaissance cars with an MG for a few infantry run-ins.
@WilliamTestaert6 сағат бұрын
Interesting!
@quentinking43515 сағат бұрын
I understood that reference
@jakubl82716 сағат бұрын
Looks like a vehicle to be used in area with well developed infrastructure, like cities, to fight against not so well armed people, like protesting civilians, partisans on occupied areas at most..
@stanislavczebinski9945 сағат бұрын
I highly doubt that little box is for the battery. This was long before the age of lithium-ion. Batteries were big, heavy and bulky back then. Maybe those lived in the lower rear....
@ramdynebix4 сағат бұрын
It’s probably a 6V car, so the battery is tiny
@stanislavczebinski9943 сағат бұрын
@@ramdynebix Not really. We're talking 1930ies here. Even at only 6 Volts - those batteries had to be big and heavy. Yes - today we have (motorcycle) batteries that would fit in that compartment. But even those wouldn't have enough power for this application. Even considering it probably never had a starter motor - just to get enough power to run the radio whilst running the engine would require a big chunk of lead and acid. That's why I think they might have been in the lower rear.
@kemarisite5 сағат бұрын
If all the enemy has is rifles with ball ammunition, then the 6 mm armor is likely fine.
@seanmosley5834Сағат бұрын
What's that vehicle next to it?
@davidolie839214 минут бұрын
BA-6 (aka BA-10).
@mattblack118Сағат бұрын
Theses vehicles seem to be designed for a different species.