Time to change the Leg Before Wicket (LBW) rule? Evolution of LBW in cricket explained

Leg Before Wicket, one of the most complicated dismissals in cricket, is at the receiving end of quite a lot of critics off late. In this video, we have covered every tiny detail of LBW and it's evolution.

[@shajijames]

1:38 Impact In-Line is unnecessary. It takes a lot away from a bowler who can spin and swing the ball to a greater degree.

[@shivakumar7578]

Great information. In my opinion LBW decision should be out of umpire's hand. Now that we have technology , LBW decision should be given by third umpire. In this way we can save the game rather giving out for a player who is really not out. It is worst to know that it is umpire's mistake later. I also think that the review system should be removed. We can not blindly afford umpire errors despite having great technology.

[@hoagy_ytfc]

Nice summary of the history of LBW, thank you.

[@soumyaranjanpanigrah]

I think Ian chappel makes a valid point and no surprise that most people agree with him (mee too). Great analysis by the way although i think i would not agree with ur last point because more the batsman tries to play with the bat more it makes the game interesting rather than boring. Also if you see now, most bolwers be it pacers or spiners are trying to keep the ball straigth with as little deviation from the surface as posible because there is no reward for seam and spin. Hence if the seamer or spinner is not getting reward for seaming and spinning the ball and beating the batsman/women then whats the point!! No wonder we are seeing more and more bowlers who can bowl stump to stump without much skill of spinning or seaming the ball.

[@shivamporwal6115]

Why no more videos?

[@vikasninama7316]

Just Remove Umpires Call

[@amareswarmishra6870]

No need

[@gowravshastry2463]

The current LBW rule shouldnt be change.. Its good..

[@amritashv.6021]

Is Bumrah a Chuk bowler???