How to Ace a Contract Law Question

[@lalindraranatunga2244]

Great work Shaveen. Keep up the good work.

[@harrycb189]

i got 100% on my offer and acceptance exam !! thank you !!!

[@TheLawSimplified]

Congratulations Harry!

[@libertytatendadzoro7294]

from Zimbabwe at the university of Zimbabwe, some differences with our contract law but thanks a lot

[@boombap2023]

Thank you for this please do more

[@katesithole8629]

Your work is exceptional. Thank you.

[@Unknown-zw8kl]

great work bro appreciated :) and keep going on like this..

[@TheLawSimplified]

Many thanks. I'm glad this was helpful. If you're interested, I conduct several one-on-one masterclasses. Drop a message on the official Facebook page: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified

[@Arehman45542]

Hi the email iiii

[@TheLawSimplified]

[e-mail]

[@sylvesterelleamoh464]

Well done!

[@Binu8767]

Thankss this helped a lot!❤

[@Ksye003]

I have a question, if betsy emailed accepting the offer but with new terms, which was "asking for a sixth month guarantee." would that not calssify as acceptance due to the mirror rule?

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Lisa. That’s an acceptable argument. However, because the material terms of the offer would change with the inclusion of the “six month guarantee” if would have to reciprocally be met with acceptance from the opposite end.

[@Ksye003]

@@TheLawSimplified Makes sense, thank you so much

[@RISHIRAJ-xc7tu]

In Indian corporate context, after all tendering / negotiation process, Purchaser sends a PO to seller for acceptance, with some additional terms. Normally, seller accepts PO with some comments & limit liability say 10 % of contract value. Afterward purchaser does not send revised PO (even doesn’t object on comments) and work started. Seller send deliverables and purchaser release payments. My question is whether PO is considered as valid. At this juncture, I want to safeguard interest of seller and not purchaser.

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Rishi. Irrespective of the written terms and the procedure followed, based on your scenario, the conduct of the parties would be admissible in Court to establish a contract between the parties enforceable by both buyer and seller.

[@RISHIRAJ-xc7tu]

Is it acceptable in view of sub-silentio. Whether terms as commented by seller , shall hold good as well. Thanks 👍

[@sandrabediako3470]

Hello, I'm Sandra. I just chanced upon your channel, and I thank God that I did!!! What you are doing is really great. How can I contact or reach you.

[@TheLawSimplified]

+Sandra Bediako Hi Sandra. Please drop a message on the official Facebook page: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified

[@joelariel]

Very useful thanks

[@smallbigsister_]

Thank you!

[@Diajg3qp]

Could you do a commercial law one too? :)

[@munirahjohari8890]

brilliant

[@TheLawSimplified]

+Munirah Johari Hi Munirah. I'm glad this lesson was helpful. If you're interested in a private tutoring masterclass, drop a message to the official Facebook page: facebook.com/TheLawSimplified

[@elenaferrer7543]

fantastic video, thanks for sharing it. 😊

[@dattaeswar6086]

Thanks bro

[@aminakhan9605]

Hi Shaveen, is this English Contract Law?

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Amina. Yes, this is English Contract Law. If you'd like further guidance on answering questions or would like to arrange a Masterclass, drop an email to: [e-mail]

[@danielkenyi5941]

Law of contract

[@anishrao2086]

Hey! Are you Sri Lankan?

[@TheLawSimplified]

Yes, I am 😊

[@Daugi5613]

can someone tell me the answer to this problem, please???

[@TheLawSimplified]

Hi Daniel. If you'd like to discuss how to structure answers, drop an email: [e-mail]

[@gabrielacioban7484]

❤

[@lukeford3310]

Thankyou very helpful