THE LEGAL QUEEN REACTS TO AMBER HEARD VS CAMILLE VASQUEZ

[@deerick3109]

This is why cameras should be made available in every courtroom. If this trial wasn’t being broadcast the media would be spinning this in Ambers favor to further its own agenda.

[@AmandaPaige71]

Agreed!

[@maryatkinson2586]

DITTO

[@randomperson-up5vt]

That's the truth

[@streaky81]

Yup, and that's why they hate it - and hate LawTube for making it accessible.

[@TR4zest]

DESPITE this being televised, mainstream media is still spinning in Amber's favour.

[@camrondirossi3249]

I'm so embarrassed that the English law let Johnny Depp down

[@GratifyMeNow13]

English law lets people down all the time. If convicted a 15 yo blind boy of murder just for being near the scene where a person was attacked and subsequently died. He’s still inside.

[@beckynelson6786]

Me too.

[@cdorberlee]

Could be the jury were bribe by the sun newspaper.

[@noneofyourbusiness9369]

camron di rossi * that's because Elon Musk has ties to the Sun Rag editor and owner. The owner of the Sun Rag is involved with Elon Musk's Tesla. Ambush Turd and Elon Musk I believe they both planed these lies to destroy Mr Depp's life. I believe she planned this as far back when she met Mr Depp. I always felt she would be poisonous for Mr Depp.

[@skyebowleyn6364]

Innocent untill proven guilty 😔

[@dreamweaver1832]

Camille is a beast in the court room. She’s so direct as well.

[@leahcasell1487]

AH is no match for hurricane Cammile

[@leahcasell1487]

I want to know how AH mother died from. AH threatened to kill JD

[@monsteryyyy]

@@leahcasell1487 “keep my mom out of you fking mouth” -AH

[@sallymj8957]

“What actual survivor of domestic violence would want that?” Exactly. What actual survivor, indeed.

[@sandracarson2509]

Amber is saying she is not an actual survivor. I thought the same.

[@vickipeck2323]

​@@sandracarson2509 she very angrily claimed she "was Not a victim" Exactly.

[@ilenetyrrell4484]

I testified recently against my ex-husband and I could barely speak about the events. I was an emotional wreck, I was only able to stare at my support person in the courtroom and yet Amber Heard is able to look not only at The Jury, The Judge, The Lawyers and Johnny Depp her alleged abuser. Without any form of emotional reaction. AS A SUFFERER MYSELF I CALL A BULL ON THE WHOLE THING!

[@stefan1draganov]

She turned her head every single time. And after the verdict, it was so ironic that she said that "this is a major setback for women"... Well yes, but because the most famous trial of domestic violence is actually about a woman lying about it.

[@kosar98]

Thats what the lawyer of law and lumber was talking about, he was handling more on DV, he said, you dont even have to shows recordings or videos, just to proved ur a victim, he explained that the statement alone, you can feel and see if ur lying or not ..

[@sekichdawn3913]

I'm sorry you went through that💔 Hopefully the sun is shining on you now🌞🌞

[@MsMadelineTwoPointOh]

I'm furious for you.

[@fxlyon]

I remember when I testified in court against my SA abuser I could only look at the person asking me questions. The only time I looked at the jury was when I gave my impact statement and even then as I scanned them, I don’t remember SEEING them, if that makes sense. Just blurs. It was only till after I left the courtroom that someone told me one of the jurors was crying after I gave my statement. I couldn’t stand being in the same room as my abuser, I could barely look at him. Amber Heard is so full of shit, always has been

[@gorgona1984]

Camille's Vazquez cross-examination of Amber Heard will certainly become the gold standard when teaching law students how to cross-examine a defendant.

[@cargopilotguy305]

You should also watch Earl Grey cross examine Daunte Wright’s mother. Absolute master class.

[@darshang1262]

@@cargopilotguy305 send thr link please

[@jesusislord9080]

Yeah comedy gold 😂 how to cross examine a pygmy 101.

[@stephenjacobson560]

Yes - 'how to go down in flames, and make a last ditch effort to fling shit and confuse the jury, in the hopes they have no idea what the trial is really about'.

[@cargopilotguy305]

@@darshang1262 kzbin.info/www/bejne/o363in94f8tlgtU

[@HMan2828]

Amber doesn't seem to realize that TMZ publishing the video 15 minutes after receipt, which only occurs if they have already secured the copyright, proves that she sent it to TMZ. The original copyright owner of the video is the person who filmed it, so for TMZ to acquire the copyright, they had to acquire the video directly from her, and no one else. And if that wasn't the case, her lawyers would be all over TMZ suing them and all trying to strike the evidence as illegally obtained. The fact that they did nothing further proves the point.

[@lizroberts1569]

Oh I think she does, she’s just lying as usual.

[@MisterRlGHT]

I believe her. I bet she shot the video, then immediately forwarded ti to one of her dopey friends and had that person make the cuts she wanted and send it along to TMZ. She thereby thinks she's answering honestly when she denies leaking the video, since she neither edited the footage with her hands on her own phone nor forwarded it to TMZ herself.

[@bereasonable8018]

The best part is that no one had to point this out overtly to the jurors, which could have caused that evidence/testimony to be thrown out. Depp’s attorneys were very careful about how to word their questions and Tremaine understood not to go there as well.

[@xZotiC454]

Not only this. TMZ lawyer was sitting on AH side? Clearly in kahoots (as such) it was 100% a piece of the puzzle that shows she gave it to them. If not why would he be sitting with them? That’s a red-flag and hopefully the jury caught on.

[@dianemoonstone4715]

@@xZotiC454 : Agree. And yes, hopefully the jury caught on.

[@AngelsVoiceASMR]

Let’s keep in mind she never says it was difficult to walk in heels the next day.. that it is difficult to swallow for weeks after being choked, how difficult it was to pee or sit after being sexually abxsed. She never backs up her supposed injuries with the post pain or difficulty of having them. My friend was punched in her face over and over and her cheek bone and nose was shattered. She was swollen for months. Arnica cream didn’t really help. Time was the only thing that healed the bruises. She still has problems inside her nose to this day. Amber’s face has never been punched or hit over and over also JD is right handed …. Her bruises would of been on the left side … smh 🤦‍♀️

[@triciac1019]

Yes, it would have on her left cheek, great point.

[@janefreeman995]

This is another detail ... It's arnica, but her lawyer called it amica. You make a great point about the lingering pain. I've had a friend with a personality disorder who 'cries', baits, ...has so many simular behaviors, it's eerie. The difference is the motivation of money.

[@JLynnEchelon]

That's thing that does it for me, too. Her SA story didn't make sense. She reported slipping all over the floor in her own blood, but then just took a sleeping pill and went to sleep? With all the glass in her feet? And then walked through the airport the next day? She flew home first class, not private and connected to another flight. How did she walk anywhere the next day if her feet were that cut up? And not one person noticed?

[@livetotell100]

Not to mention all the rings he wears. There should be a mark from every ring on her face. Not just one bruise. She said JD split her lip. Yet the very next day there is a picture of her spreading her mouth really wide. If her lip was split, it would have started to bleed again.

[@holden6104]

She really went over the top with the injuries when she didn't have to. Amazing to me that her legal team didn't flag these issues before the trial.

[@LizbetPCB]

Well, this was a treat! Nice to get a British legal expert’s take on Heard’s testimony. Thank you! PS Ms. Vasquez pronounces her surname as ‘Vas Kez’. 🇬🇧

[@earicruz9105]

I really enjoyed this video. Didn't really mind the pronunciation. But I keep hearing Elaine saying it over and over.

[@LizbetPCB]

@@earicruz9105 oh gah! Elaine never pronounced it correctly.

[@DeltaAssaultGaming]

Hasn’t she ever watched Aliens?

[@LizbetPCB]

@@DeltaAssaultGaming yeah, right? And that Vasquez was another badass, too!

[@eduardovazquez9532]

In Puerto Rico we pronounce Vazkez.

[@elizabethanthony3916]

She absolutely did smirk, the full video has been on line for ages!

[@Obseye777]

For the first time in watching this, I finally figured out why she wasn’t ever humble or accountable… she’s really enjoying this, like a true histrionic.

[@yegmeshjwp]

I'm not familiar with disorders, do you know how/why they'd enjoy it? I could only think it would be hubris that they could fool everyone (to be fair, only really need to fool the jury).

[@1ACL]

Exactly. She loves it. She loves the attention even if it's negative.

[@singularity4049]

This is a real easy lie to catch - there is no way TMZ can claim copyright without the comfort that the original maker of the video has consented.

[@Zero-NotXenu]

TMZ SAID she leaked it when they broadcast it. Here's the link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/bIbbanWNeNB_Zrc

[@arunkp20]

Yeah. She would've had a much better chance of winning this case if she said the truth in these small details which can't be used to dispute her abuse claims. She's absolutely ridiculous and her legal team is incompetent. Why would they try to portray her as miss perfect when she's clearly not. They should've said the truth about everything and stood their ground only on the abuse claims.

[@sergiomontes2568]

@@arunkp20 I hink it is becoming clear Amber´s legal team do like Amber much and are taking her for a ride as long as she keeps paying them bills, they will keep givnig her false hope. HerLegalTeam: "no man, she is perfect, she did everything perfectly on the stand, her words and demenoer were impecable... is only that the jurors could not overcome the macho culture we are brought up, but on the apeal we will easily prove this and Amber will get what she deserves" Basically, they are taking advantage of a very vulnarable woman that suffers from several personality disorders and still has some money and motivation to pay.

[@Xocolatben]

The TMZ video was aired on Aug. 16, 2016 on the TMZ show. I remember it from then. TMZ outed amber as the leaker and questioned her motives. kzbin.info/www/bejne/anSUooiffclpr8U They were grandstanding for the publicity. One thing for sure, Joan of NARC's team were dazzled and rattled by the social media reaction. It seemed like Eve Barlow was feeding them bad news and they were influenced by it.

[@kellyhurley741]

@@sergiomontes2568 I said the exact same thing! & I feel like that’s why Elaine is basically on a press-run right now. Amber is too blinded by her own greed & stupidity to see that these lawyers are trying to run her dry. I’m sure she believes she’s smarter than her own legal team, judging by the fact that she thought the world & jurors would be too stupid to catch on to her lies

[@davidreynolds8551]

It’s amazing how easy it is to fake bruises when you use a “bruise kit”, as ScAmber Turd made the Freudian slip in both her UK deposition and actually on the stand in the American trial. The “bruise kit” is actually a theatrical makeup kit designed to make realistic bruises and abrasions.

[@alvinjohnson2402]

@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! the sharp object could be a TV remote, pencil, plastic spoon, or many things. Did the audio specify "knife, glass shard, large screwdriver" etc? did Amber testify it was a deadly object like a knife? I didn't hear that part of the trial. I'm quite sure you would be able to tell the difference if someone was chasing you. FIRST, you would SEE the object to fear it! Second, your response would be to fight or run. BEGGING someone to stop trying to kill you doesn't coincide together, my friend. Either the deranged person will inflict some type of damage (cuts, stab wounds, etc). MS Heard has already proved she's conniving and slick enough at producing the results she wants you to know...her side ONLY!

[@maryalvarez8302]

@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! amber is a abuser and if he did chase her gone girl ass around have you ever thought maybe he got tired of being abused by a narcissist. Only morons love Amber

[@bcpr9812]

@Asshats Love Johnny Depp!! Johnny Depp Es Racista!! post the link, then.

[@TheSmokey1523]

She even demonstrated the wrong procedure for concealing bruises, putting the color corrector first the foundation and the bruise color on top. People were trying out her procedure and all came out with “bruises”. She had so many Freudian slips too.

[@jenniechurch5337]

*Also the theatrical bruise kit, can be seen in the picture of Johnny, passed out with the awful ice cream that Amber set up!

[@TheBeelzeboss]

"She cant look at Vasquez because she's lying" According to Paul Ekman, liars actually HAVE to look at you when they lie. They need to know if their lies are being believed. That's why she's looking at the jury all the time.

[@mefford67]

Amber is a profoundly broken human being and I genuinely fear for her daughter’s well-being. And I’m not being hyperbolic…😬

[@beebz8922]

I literally can’t stand seeing amber talk. She disgusts me. She can’t at all keep herself from looking at the jury and trying to get them to believe her nasty story. It absolutely grosses me out

[@beebz8922]

@@Jase_TV yessss!! Al that beauty on the outside she goes and ruins with her dark insides. It’s so sad!

[@xino_z]

We are right here with you she makes me cringe so bad my daughter knows when I'm watching the trial

[@user-gu6fm3je5g]

I agree, the only thing that crossed my mind is if she genuinely has a mental problem and doesn’t realise what she’s doing. I’m not trying to make excuses for her actions, at all but hopefully if she has got genuine issues, let’s hope it doesn’t reflect on her partner and child.

[@1ACL]

I wanted to puke by the end of it. I can't even watch this.

[@birdenthusiast2095]

Same. She’s irritating.

[@virginiatozier9957]

I love how AH's lawyer admits " she's trying to answer the question the best she can." He left off "considering she's lying like a rug."

[@Guttergirl61]

Poor Elaine! She did the best she could with a client like AH. Honestly, watching Elaine while Johnny was speaking, looked truly sympathetic.

[@xino_z]

Virginia!!! 😂🤣😂

[@xino_z]

Oh SNAP!!! 😂😂 she got me 🤣🤣

[@sekichdawn3913]

When you're telling the truth you don't have "try to answer the question" you just do. I think her lawyers forgot about that. No instead they try to hold her hand like a toddler when answering questions.

[@rayray6490]

I feel like Rottenborn is just doing his job and knows his client is “problematic”. Elaine though seem to be on the AH train

[@creightonc8147]

Let me get this right, you let a diagnosed borderline walk into your courts and lead a judge around by his nose. She then goes on world wide TV and displays ever trademark of a narcissistic secondary psychopath that basically exist. The pathological lying, the exaggerated emotions known as mimicking, the inability to cry, rapidly shifting from exaggerated emotions to calm on a dime, the tell tale smirk, the pure malevolence displayed in the recordings, she has even glitched, on the stand. Actually glitching, the loss of control, “my dog stepped on a bee” and the facial glitch, the pure loss of control. You know why she doesn’t cry? She doesn’t know how. The fake control she tries to express, like her fake note taking. Her notes are mostly blank. The imitation game, she copied his clothes, his hair, she even wore the same pin as Johnny. What kind of idiot judge let that walk into his courtroom and fool them? She’s not even hard to spot. Look at her damn sister, she looks like Ambers pet, she can’t even look at her, always looking down. You can literally see the fear and Trauma flowing off of Whitney. Did everyone take crazy pills? How the hell has she been walking around getting away with it? Look at how she does her makeup, the sharp lines, the blood red lipstick. Gacey was more subtle than this. Here Johnny happy birthday, I got you knife, it says till death do us part, I hope like it, it’s your present. Oh boy I bet she had plans for that. Bet she was a cutter too.

[@eboli7146]

Diagnosed by Depp’s hired expert. I doubt she has ever acknowledged she has a personality disorder. The fact that she has been getting away with it shows the sexism and poor logic of the “believe all women” slogan.

[@nbodeh4658]

Amen

[@nsoldt]

Spot on! Well said.

[@user-ys7ur5em1k]

You should get at least 1k thumbs up

[@sandeshkaur9533]

Why would you even give a knife like that to an abuser in the first place, someone that you're so afraid of makes 0 sense ,oh actually because he wasn't the abuser she was .

[@diane4488]

This was a great day, for justice, and the victims of narcissistic personalities - men or women. Many of these borderline types do their best to ruin the lives of the people they live with, leave or divorce. She blatantly lied so much, and it was so obvious that she was acting, trying to pretend she was upset and distressed. Well, I hope she's genuinely distressed now, knowing that virtually no one believes her lies. Even when the FACTS clearly showed she was lying, she just continued to try and con everyone. I hope this sends a big message to other narcissistic people, that the rest of us are onto them. And we are no longer going to let them get away with their vile and malicious behaviours.

[@sekichdawn3913]

Histrionic personality more like sociopath. If I remember correctly they're about the same.

[@OnMyOwn__4]

Please do not disrespect people with mental illnesses like that. I’m diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder and I would never do this to someone.

[@livlovely2707]

She keeps looking at the jury when she answers because she is PERFORMING for them; she knows she must convince them. And juries really don't like that; it is confrontational!

[@georgesaguna]

Being such a litigious person I am pretty sure that she would sue TMZ if they published it without her consent.

[@Daniel-xu6kd]

Sounds like regurgitation of someone else’s words

[@georgesaguna]

@@Daniel-xu6kd I agree she does sound like she was defending herself as she was coached.

[@georgesaguna]

@@tagz12345 are we talking about Amber Heard we r some one else ?

[@georgesaguna]

@@tagz12345 I would love her to be innocent. There wouldn’t be a better outcome then her being innocent. This was not a game of football where there is one winner and one loser. This is the story of domestic violence victims. I see too many inconsistencies in her testimony, this is my own opinion and personally she doesn’t come through as being honest. She let me down big time. I seriously wanted her to be right.

[@georgesaguna]

@@tagz12345 I did have a look at your videos as it’s very important that people give the same opportunity to both sides to speak. I put the effort to listen to all the trial from day one. Both sides have their faults and dark sides but honestly she didn’t convince me. I tried my hardest to hear her but too many red flags. One which I can’t really understand is why would some one who was suffering from domestic violence gift a massive knife to her aggressor and then testify that she had nothing to fear. One other red flags was the people that she surrounded her self with, starting from her lawyers and ending with most of her experts. Most of them came through as arrogant and somehow ditched ( like dr Spigel). The way she looked at the jury was scary, I would have felt heiresses. At one point she said that she found the court case extremely triggering but she only sort or “cried” when she was being questioned by her own lawyer, she became very aggressive and evasive when questioned by Vasques. But these are my honest feelings of a spectator from home with out much background information about both of them.

[@nimascolari1508]

As a British solicitor and LPC litigation tutor I can openly say without reservation that I was surprised by Amber's team and their inability to litigate. Especially at the outset. However, Depp's team definitely came into their own especially during cross examination, while Amber's team rapidly declined. It was shocking to see how incapable Amber's legal team is and some of their methods highly questionable. Camille's incessant objections were a gambit, some were even rejected because she wanted to agitate a witness that is known to be volatile and snappy. Hence why some of her objections were overruled. She knew they would be, it was a very smart strategy and her rhythm/tempo of questioning was perfectly planned. Ben Chew has to take credit for assembling that team and their game plan was brilliant. I do feel sorry for Amber's lawyers as they had very little to work with, nevertheless, they were lacking.

[@MrScaramoosh]

They were lacking in spirit and passion, probably because they did not truly believe their client!.

[@LMC5690]

What is your professional opinion on the UK trial

[@awang557]

Lawyers wanted their clients to tell the truth even how guilty it looks so that they can do their job well. But Amber didn't tell the truth to her lawyers. She lied.

[@Noblesse_Azul]

Amber won’t tell the truth

[@анниелниф]

I feel sorry for Amber . "game plan" lol - lots of money......

[@toothdoc8206]

another aspect of camille's cross was that she moved rapidly through the questions, changing topics, and keeping amber feeling the pressure and being off balance. she tripped amber up a few times with this tactic and got amber to admit to things she might not have with a softer cross.

[@анниелниф]

Camille would tripp Jonny easily as well if she would be Ambers lower LOL

[@rachaelcook8113]

Like when she said I would have leaked it better and camille said she testified that she didn't know how

[@BabyKangaroo279]

@@анниелниф I highly doubt it..he didn't seem to get tripped up when Rottenborn did rapidfire cross and interrupted him at every chance. Plus, his story has been extremely consistent with evidence to back it up while AH keeps changing hers, which makes it easier to trap them

[@rotha012881112]

@@BabyKangaroo279

[@CrystalShadow]

@@BabyKangaroo279agreed! Mr.Depp was on the ball! His ex was a defensive mess 😅

[@swampophelia2098]

Johnny could slam as many doors as he liked, they were his doors, in his kitchen, in his penthouse. The rest of them were scrounging off a man who was quite unwell and deep into his addiction and Amber and her friends took full advantage of that

[@traciereynolds3057]

Exactly and subjected to crazy making from a full on narcissist. So sad

[@baseballjustin5]

This is his main house I believe but same theory

[@randomvintagefilm273]

I'm pissed the jury gave her anything! There must have been a hold-out juror the others had to make a deal with.

[@sshms414]

There was that's exactly what the juror said in his video after the trial they had to compromise because they couldn't agree

[@Mabrrrr]

Jury

[@ThePandalorianGaming]

It technically wasn't against Johnny, it was against his former lawyer. However, she still didn't win a penny considering the massive JD winnings

[@skyebowleyn6364]

Well if you think about it she really gets nothing . She owes Johnny 15 million and the best part she cannot file for bankruptcy on it. Its was malicious intent.

[@tamisum]

Don't be because from what I hearing it will make it harder for her to appeal.

[@mistyyoung5587]

She's constantly looking at the jury when she answers questions. To the point, supposedly, the jurors are angling away from her.

[@patricknez7258]

Yes, so true! She can't help it imo. She's so desperate to be believed, I honestly think she can't control it. People that lie a lot often gauge the response of others to see if they're being believed and how their lies are being recieved. Imo, she's so impulse-driven, and so invested in her lies, that it's almost involuntary at this point. She constantly feels compelled to check the jury bc the stakes are so high for her, and I think also she's very insecure about being believed. Imo, bc she knows she's lying. If I were on the jury, I would be so uncomfortable w her constant stares and explanations. She loves monologuing to the jury, it would be gross

[@mistyyoung5587]

@@patricknez7258 there is a couple channels with people who were in the court and said that the juror closest to the witness stand, was looking away and blocking his face a bit when she was on the stand. It's very uncomfortable watching her talk. It just seems so fake. And I agree I don't think she can really help herself with her lying. Even when caught she doesn't admit it she doubles down on the lie.

[@angelicsailor1st]

It’s really against etiquette to stare and “talk” at the jury

[@mistyyoung5587]

@@angelicsailor1st cause they are supposed to observe pretty much. Like a fly on the wall. I know that sometimes JD and others talked to the jury, but not pretty much "every" time like AH.

[@angelagivens545]

IMOPO. I feel it's manipulation she's forcing herself on the jury kind of like a subtle form of mind control. not only that also I feel she is reading their faces memorizing them to make the jury fear her. the looks she gives should have landed her lying ass in jail. she is a narcissistic sex craved addict. she was in a fantasy thinking that she could piss Johnny off so much he would have grudge sex something she insanely enjoys. she likes being choked to almost passing out it's euphoric and the orgasm is so explosive.... so I've heard. lol anyways she will do something to this lawyer and Johnny isn't done with her yet.. how do I know this you ask? I am just like her to a degree. I have put my poor ex through it to the point of no return. it's called women who think like warriors you know amazonian women who are strong with many personalities. it's like poor one minded Johnny has no chance against Ambers mental army. the only way to win was to expose her bring her demons to the light. Good will override evil anyway. just don't think it's over because you are small minded to her many voices. I'm no lawyer. I'm no judge. I'm just a bystander looking at Amber and wondering her next move she will stalk Johnny. she's angry. she will be quiet as a mouse. it's during this time her ass is the most dangerous. hopefully all involved keeps one eye open and one on her ass

[@SpinTheWords]

This is the reason a case like this would NEVER go well in the UK because it would be spun wildly without proof of the matter. Thank God they brought the case to the U.S.

[@aleccampbell7707]

Yet it went VERY well in Depp V The Sun in the UK for AH with the corrupt judge

[@alexandradixon3775]

Except for the fact where there *was* a case in the UK and the judge ruled that in 12 out of 14 cases Johnny Depp *did* abuse Amber Heard. And then he lost his appeal - in the UK.

[@B.Scruby]

@@alexandradixon3775 Incorrect. The UK Case was against The Sun and not Amber, and she had no business being there but went there anyway every single day. The judge then didn't rule for Amber, it ruled for The Sun. This US case is different in the sense that it's purely against Amber.

[@kennethroth6757]

Women rights in uk tops America women rights..

[@MRPandoraHartDR]

@@alexandradixon3775 JD's case was against The Sun though, not Amber and a lot of the evidence he's been able to bring into this Virginia case to refute her claims was simply tossed out by the judge as 'inconclusive' Plus, the police body cam footage wasn't available and thought lost. So it was never admitted. Also the ACLU refused to provide the evidence Amber had not donated the $7mil. Which lead to the judge making that 'donation' a crucial part of the reason he chose to side with Amber. Well that and it came to light Justice Nichol's son was working for The Sun and his ex wife was good friends with Amber so he should have been recused from the case. JD lost the appeal because he was dealing with the same biased and corrupt judge, who retired straight afterwards to avoid any recriminations for his handling of the case. Anyway now the truth is out, Amber may well be in for perjury charges in the UK particularly over the ACLU lie she told over here.

[@xino_z]

This was the best explanation as to why Camille left those questions hanging. The jury was left spinning and dizzy with contradictions like the rest of us.😵‍💫 Well explained.

[@Toby3610]

Yes I really like the explanation. Especially cause I struggle with these types of questions and I am unable to grasp the skills needed for this. I have watched this trial and other police (detective stuff). Plus I hate conflict, have bad social anxiety, and get panic attacks. I love strong, level headed, calm people.

[@KingsguardRP]

@@Toby3610 its actually psychology. We as humans tend to believe conclusions we come to ourselves more than the conclusion we are given. In the latter, we find excuses to disprove it but we dont try to disprove a conclusion we arrive on our own. With that said, what Camille does is lead the jury with questions to the end without actually saying what the conclusion is, she lets the jury fill in the blank themselves.

[@sandrabarrie84]

I have a sister who, like The Turd is a narcissist. She is self-centered, goes to extremes to get attention, goes to extremes to hurt people she is jealous of, is volatile, unpredictable and violent. And there’s no point arguing with a narcissist. They never accept responsibility or admit to wrongdoing. You tell them the facts, what the reality is and say “I’m not going to argue about this because you know that I’m right.” It tells them you won’t be manipulated and it drives them crazy.

[@andersonmicheal4734]

@@sandrabarrie84 Hello Sandra, How are you doing?

[@xino_z]

@@sandrabarrie84 firstly, I am so sorry you have to deal with that in your immediate family. It screws up the whole family dynamic and I hope you are able to cope with it. I am really sorry, though. I have a friend with a father who is a narcissist, she is 40, and he still wreaks havoc on her life any way he can. It's no joke. What you said here is exactly why I am very annoyed they found one count for Amber. Where most people would see this as a loss and run, she will see it as validation. Hopefully I am wrong but her press statement was not encouraging.

[@debbierobinsonakad.s.robso6298]

I was impressed with Camille because she was there to see justice done and didn't use dishonest tactics like Ambers did. And I did indeed listen to everything she had to say. I saw through her testimony straight away.

[@skate7destroy1]

This is my first time listening to The Legal Queen give a legal analysis of anything, but after listening to this I can emphatically say that she's one of the best at explaining the small nuances found in the cross examination by Camille Vasquez, just dropping facts out there, drilling down when more information in necessary and she can prove Heard is being dishonest, but just asking questions and after Heard tells a lie, just moves on, just creating doubt, giving Amber enough rope to hang herself, letting her obvious lies be told, and moving on. Great analysis Legal Queen. SUBSCRIBED!!!

[@growlow2880]

I wish she had touched more on how Amber turns to the jury to answer every question, it is the most bizarre and blatant attempt at manipulation I've ever seen. It's beyond disingenuous. She has the self and spatial awareness of a sociopath.

[@skulletorable]

Idk why people are up in arms about this. In a trial you are not convincing the lawyer, you are convincing the jury. You are answering the questions to the jury. That’s why she is talking to them. I’m not team amber either, I hope Johnny wins cos she’s a piece of trash, but this is normal when jury’s are involved.

[@1mol831]

my friend studies spacial engineering, she has a great spacial awareness as well, I don't think she is a sociopath though.

[@growlow2880]

@@1mol831 thanks for pointing out my error, kudos to you.

[@Cunning.Stunt.777]

She would of been told to do that, I was a witness in a Crown Court and was told I was to answer all my questions together jury, not the Solicitor! It was actually really difficult to look away from someone directly talking to you, to answer! Amber has definitely found it as a tool to look away from Camille imo.

[@brilliancebipolar]

Yes however I don't think the general population has the knowledge nor confidence in any knowledge of mental illness to where such signs and symptoms would be so obvious to them.

[@sayawolf1061]

Vasquez probably knows how to treat a narcisisstic person. Because these kind of people can't answer simple yes or no questions. Everything is never their fault, they're perfect and the most clever people on earth. You can't argue with them. They're constantly lying. Reminds me of my dad.

[@anrkyking720]

In the closing arguments, I think the bombshell she dropped was that fact that no one showed up for amber in court other than paid experts and her sister. That really speaks volume in my opinion…

[@stephenjacobson560]

Oh yes - we should all be judged on how many people come to our funderal. You fool.

[@bereasonable8018]

For me the best part was Camille pointing out that to believe Amber you would have to believe more than 20 other people all lied on the stand.

[@nsoldt]

@@bereasonable8018 But..but...they were all coming out of the woodwork for their 15 minutes of fame in the Johnny Depp show! Miss Heard told me so! *trying to squeeze out a tear*

[@benedicthampus4964]

@@nsoldt 😂👏

[@dianemoonstone4715]

I guess none of the so-called witnesses wanted to perjure themselves in court. It's different lying to tabloids, especially if there's financial remuneration, but consequences are more dire with the whole world watching on. But apparently not for pathological liars and malignant narcissists.

[@MatteoPrezioso]

This cross examination is the literal definition of 'majestic takedown'.

[@mirandabensch1081]

I love that she said that about the video of Johnny hitting the cabinets! She was so spot on about that! I still to this day, even being with my partner of 8 years who has never laid a hand on me, still jump and get defensive if I hear anything loud or like people yelling just out of that habit of the fear thinking it's going to turn on to me next! She just stood there and videotaped it and a few times moved the phone to keep it on him and then I believe even smirked after! She wasn't in any kind of danger she was being a narcissistic malicious b****. Not for nothing what kind of person in the first place even does that if not for some kind of messed up reason.

[@sallymascorro]

Miranda Bensch you nailed it 👏 👌 🙌 👍

[@septopus3516]

if the UK legal system wasn't shite, this trial wouldn't have been

[@victorstaniste8614]

Its actually amazes me that the UK courts decided in favour of Amber H. I thought our courts are shit, but man, was i wrong :))

[@QuestionableLifeChoices]

nah, it was that specific judge. he made some seriously shady rulings throughout that screamed his bias. things like AH constantly describing the australia incident as a hostage situation and JD's lawyer rightfully pointing out that hostages don't have free and open access to their phone, a car, or the rest of the house, nor do they constantly keep trying to STAY in the house with their abuser. the judge decided "oh well she was clearly being hyperbolic, let it go." like, literally

[@nimascolari1508]

Far superior to the US, system. This was a public policy decision and the ruling was based on lies on the back of the "me too" movement which is why she timed it for then and she could face perjury. There are far more instances of injustice in the US system including executions which later are found to have been innocent people. Don't be fooled by one high profile case.

[@Ghoulza]

well no, it was a different trail then, it was not Johhny vs Amber, it was Johnny vs the times. Johnny had to prove that the times knew the details were false before they published and that is not something they could have done, they took Amber's word on it and had pictures that supposedly proved her point so in their eyes it was correct and that's all they needed to prove. for Johnny's case to have won in the UK he would have needed to prove that the times knew it was false. the same would have applied in the US. actually, it probably would not even have gotten to a trial in the US. the trail in the US is completely different, as it's Johnny vs Amber directly, and now Johnny needs to prove Amber lied, and by doing so she hurt him financially. which it seems he has done. problem is a jury of plebs now how to decide what to do, that always bugs me about trail by jury, there is no telling what a room full of morons will do

[@lizroberts1569]

The UK trial wasn’t Depp v Heard it was Depp v The Sun newspaper, she was just a witness, a witness who obviously lied. Judges like jury’s can be wrong let’s hope this time the jury gets it right, but remember the jury haven’t seen ir discussed what we have.

[@bdhu2001]

No. Vasquez labors the point, because TMZ won’t publish the video without verifying that it belongs to the person who sent it. Since Amber took the video, she has the copy right. A friend or someone who’s not Amber’s agent wouldn’t given TMZ the right to post it. Instead, TMZ posted within 15 minutes. TMZ would have taken days or hours to research who had the rights. That was the whole purpose of getting Tremaine so that he could explain TMZs process. As far as Amber at the courthouse, that courthouse has a private entrance and exit for public figures. They automatically ask them if they want to use the private entrance and they have to specifically say no. In addition, That building has about 6 different entrances. That’s why Press shows when alerted to what door or etc. Otherwise they’d have to watch all entrances and still wouldn’t be able to monitor the private entrance.

[@danifaja87]

Practicing attorney at that courthouse who files DVROs- she didn’t have to be there in person either.

[@bdhu2001]

@@danifaja87 True that.

[@RedRose4141]

I'm still in shock yrs after that weird UK trial. Amber was allowed to be arrogant, cocky, rude, chomp on food etc. Nobody ever in the U.S. would be allowed to conduct themself that way.

[@caribind3]

The UK judge Andrew Nicol hid his connections to litigants and their lawyers. That trial was very corrupt.

[@RedRose4141]

@@caribind3 yes that was so obvious

[@julybaby8523]

It's a good thing it happened because we can see her real personality.

[@autumn007]

The chomping on food was the deposition in August 2016 a few months after her RTO. Not sure if she was eating food in UK trial. I haven't seen that one yet.

[@annicecooper8105]

@@autumn007 neither eating nor cameras allowed in UK courts at any time. Only court drawings.

[@Guttergirl61]

Speaking to real victims, of abuse, I have to say BE STRONG. Once a victim, I am now free but still suffer with nightmares. When you are abused, everyday, your soul begins to die. When you are being abused, you build a wall around yourself. When you are abused, you become a very quiet nervous person. When you are abused you start to believe you a stupid and ugly. When your abused you may think suicide is your only out. There is a way out. Tell the world & they will listen. God Bless you Johnny! You are victorious! 🏴‍☠️🖤

[@CrystalShadow]

Blessed be to you my dear ❤❤❤

[@jennyjohnson9579]

I couldn't help crying when reading your comment because it resognated to me! Well said! I'm not good with my words and communication but I understand every word you said. And thank you so much!❤

[@gerrimilner9448]

she admitted to using a bruise kit, then backtracked. a bruise kit is for making bruises and one of the most popular versions can be seen in the bottom of the picture with the ice cream

[@tanyaabram8336]

Really glad to finally find a Lawyer from the UK give their options on this trile, I enjoyed watching your take on this. I used to strongly believe we shouldn't have cameras in the UK courts, but after watching the full trile live streamed I have changed my mind. I think the press would not give a true and accurate account of what happened where as we can all see the truth for ourselves being able to watch it real time

[@aimeeleigh398]

With all the evidence which has come to light showing AH committed perjury in our UK court to win her case here, can the UK system hold her accountable for this now? Same with Australia? We now have evidence she took the dogs deliberately to Au, and lied to their justice system saying she didn't. She's made a mockery of two courts, surely she should be held accountable for this. Otherwise the message she's sending is that anyone can lie to the courts and get away with it.

[@waterdeptworker]

UK judge was Currupt

[@stavroulaantoniou9898]

I would imagine they could.....under "new evidence" or something else to do with proof of perjury....I am just a lay person though. Some legal bodies need to chime in .

[@teedub1990]

Seems to me the courts made a mockery of themselves. Just my humble layperson opinion though, what do I know.

[@bornfree0507]

Yep she respects no laws!

[@redrumtruecrime]

Adam Waldman is on it. He's aware she purgered herself in the UK trial against 'The Sun' !!

[@thelegalqueen]

Thank you to everyone that commented on my video! I am a Family Solicitor that practices in England & Wales! Please let me know of any videos you’d like me to react to!

[@Westpark16]

Would luv more takes on this trial

[@theowl3756]

This was an excellent review. What is absurd is the complaint by Amber's lawyer that the trial was broadcast on TV...!!! If you have the facts, you would want the entire world to see it...!!! .The pathetic excuse by her lawyer confirms that both Amber and lawyer were lying.

[@stacystallard4327]

He had just found out he owed 650 million in taxes. That’s why he said “did I say this involves you? “

[@CrystalShadow]

He didn’t owe taxes, he’s was embezzled.

[@panther7681]

If we could only have a jury like you, the falsely accused would never happen.

[@_La_Knight]

We have so many that are falsely accused even with a jury. Other factors come into play.

[@Rexhunterj]

AH is a terrible liar, so no the jury isn't the issue, it is lawyers not trying too expose the lies of the women, they usually just tell the dude to settle or plead guilty

[@kjhill8846]

Not true.

[@calliew311]

We have falsely accused, and also have innocent people in prison. No jurisprudence system is perfect, they all have their positive and negative parts. But, I am partial to a jury system.

[@cellyszn20]

"You didn't bother to wear makeup to go the courthouse?" Answer: "I did not call TMZ or any other news source, I have never done that." Ermmmm well that wasn't the question. Why wouldn't you say with full confidence "I chose not to wear makeup that day, its my right. I got tired of covering up for this guy" lol

[@BeeKay4444]

Amber is actually addressing the jury when she looks to the right. She doesn’t even look at the lawyers only placating to the jury all the time.

[@ahsan7807]

That is actually the worst thing to do

[@mary-janegreen1513]

It is unbelievably distracting and annoying.

[@amberpowell2609]

She looks at the attn for the questions then answers to the jury but she just stares longer and more intense than most people.

[@dm7232]

It is the jury that decides her fate, of course she is speaking to them, I don’t get why this bothers people. Maybe too much Law & Order?

[@notagain2856]

@@dm7232 12:18 that eyeroll must have left a positive impression on the jury

[@Bethania2022]

She was proved to be a criminal even though is a civil case. The way she just responded only to the jury showed lack of respect to the legal team, attendance and the Judge!!! Stupid!

[@cdnerin]

Excellent breakdown, thank you. The few parts of the trial I've seen, mostly just excerpts the witness testimony, Camille utterly & completely destroyed AH! I was amazed at how fabulous she was. She blew my mind, to be honest, the way she remembered EVERY WORD AH said on the stand & threw it back in her face very skillfully!

[@FaithfulandTrue949]

🎯 true victims are too terrified to even report abuse in most cases in fear of their revenge. We don't goad like Amber did, we flee with great losses counting our lives as the prize. The Judge in my case saw who the credible witness and true victim was, a wise Judge with integrity- thank God we are now safe. Shame on those who support perpetrators. Shame on those who try to put children back in harms way!

[@maily3243]

Camille's voice is so soothing, sweet, clear & assertive. ❤ Not raspy & annoying.

[@scottnelson9]

I’m going to need absolutely everyone to stop mispronouncing Vasques. Period.

[@rosebudramirez39]

I know! My Mexican ears are aching. Lol.

[@elephant_888]

It hurts my ears too!! Dang. Saying it properly is also simpler. “Vas-kez” or “Vaz-kez” please!! The “qu” is Spanish, not English!! 😓🙏🏽

[@PlayShorts3]

Probably because in English, it's pronounced as kwez since the spelling is ques... Similarly with the word quiz, pronounced as kwiz but spelling is quiz. But in cases where the name is properly pronounced over time but someone continues to mispronounce the name, it's annoying. Maybe this lady just read the name and never heard the proper pronunciation of the name. Just thought of defending the lady.

[@cheyennejones9952]

I only know how to pronounce the last name because it was one of my teachers last name, it’s a bit irritating hearing it pronounced wrong

[@serenitymuszings]

@@PlayShorts3 imo that may be true, but they mispronounced it in court. It has nothing to do with your qu pronunciation. It's disrespectful and if you're a commentator, you should research pronunciation - as you would someone with any other foreign name.

[@nathansteyn7358]

I love how respectful your responses are and how calm you sound

[@scottbattaglia8595]

What a beast of a lawyer, literally using procedure as a tool to slowly dismantle her opponent......amazing!

[@tarron3237]

You're a smart and honest woman. That's really great to see. Thank you for being impartial.

[@Armadacon]

If I was a Lawyer in that Courtroom. The times I would've called: "Objection, bullshit" are without number.

[@jarid114]

“Objection, she’s freaking lying!”

[@damilolaojuri4895]

Lol

[@earthling8585]

This entire event is such a pleasure for me. Being one who was nearly killed by my abuser, it's validation in it's purest form. There is no line they won't cross, no one is off limits. They follow no guideposts of Law or Morals. They will not stop until FORCED to. Mine even said in Court "I feel like I lost a Mom". If he had killed me, he would have said it then too. Everyone in the room was just shaking their heads thinking the same thing I was. "So, this is what you did to someone you consider a Mother to you". They cannot help but be who they are. They build their own cases, against themselves. The best thing is to take the proof to a Court and EXPOSE THEM.

[@Wavegazre]

Your guy in the back who put this together is a star. He did an amazing job pulling interesting clips from the trial and putting them together in one of the best short compilations that I've seen. Give him a bonus!

[@bxz-um9mg]

If Heard doesn’t spend some time locked up it’s almost unfair. She committed perjury and need to be accountable for it…

[@Thewu168]

No one get locked up for civil trials. It’s not a criminal procedure

[@arunkp20]

@@Thewu168 Perjury is a criminal offence even if it happened in a civil trial.

[@eileenmcconnell8420]

TMZ could not get a copyright that fast unless it came from her.

[@valerieneal2747]

EXACTLY. AH WAS SUBPOENAED TO TURN OVER HER PHONE BUT SHE NEVER DID.

[@carriebartkowiak]

@@valerieneal2747 At one point she even claimed it had been hacked.

[@ateam404]

Give me more of the Legal Queen ❤️ I love how she is breaking down the effective process of cross examination.

[@_bestcatdad]

I like that you brought up that as a cross examiner, you need to keep the questions going. That’s exactly what Camille did and it caused Amber to falter. Camille’s questions were so quick and stern that Amber wasn’t able to keep up. Amber’s lawyers gave her plenty of time to think of what they had rehearsed, so she was able to “act” her emotions and think of her answers. Camille did not let her do that and toward the end, you can see the frustration in Amber’s face, you can hear it in her voice.

[@RemoGutierrez1]

Amber's legal team was abysmal! It seems they had a terribly weak case against Depp.

[@blair7185]

On a lighter note I just found your channel and I’m so glad I did. 🤗

[@ThatChrisPryce]

Have followed on TikTok since the start, I’m so happy to find that you’re also on KZbin. Plus, I have followed this case so much that I loved hearing your thoughts on it as you are absolutely amazing. Just subscribed, can’t wait for the next one!! Love from Scotland 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@MisterBF3]

I dont think you should be following a trial on 'tiktok' of all places. It is not a reliable place. Videos are highly edited and biased and literally doesnt transfer to the spirit of a broadcasted trial in which every second is published while tiktok has to shorten it down to such little amounts. Hope JD gets a win from this one

[@mamayao6733]

Camille is me questioning my kid’s actions.

[@rhondamalotte5073]

Pay attention to how AH begins her answer: "What ACTUAL victom of DV would do that?" I found this answer to be very telling.

[@simon-515]

Thank you. You understand how a person that has been in a violent relationship would not behave like she did. Every single woman or man that has been in that situation saw it immediately. And not only did she have no fear while he was venting she kept pushing buttons. She knew he had been ripped off millions, his mother had just died and she kept at him. Never, ever would a real victim do this. She still hasn't stopped. Interview after interview to keep her lies in circulation. What this "person" and her equally disgusting lawyer don't realize is how many people , 44%, have experienced it. They should stop before they become the biggest laughing stock in the world. It's even awfully close right now.

[@childofgod1458]

good to see a UK lawyer reacts to this I'm just trying to figure out how in the world did Johnny Depp lose his case in the UK she did the same thing there the smirking the mocking the LIES

[@Garbeaux.]

Bc it was against a British newspaper, not Amber. The paper printed what Amber was alleging. All they needed was Amber crying abuse. So it didn’t fall back on the paper to be liable but on Amber.

[@childofgod1458]

@@Garbeaux. pretty much just needed to confirm that's what it was thank you

[@annicecooper8105]

Lots of evidence was ruled inadmissable in the UK case. None of the audio tapes made it in not the deposition tapes.

[@LawyerDells]

Why OH WHY did Amber take on such a huge burden of proof where none of her evidence was commensurate with the INCREDIBLE claims, will never be understood!

[@danielroger9012]

Because she was succhessful in GB.

[@Thor11th]

You're truly a legal queen. You've explained it so well. Thank you please keep making videos

[@elliemar6687]

the worst part is when she said she could have leaked things a lor earlier and in a more effective way when a few days prior she testified that she wouldn't even know how to leak a video. I mean she is a pathological liar, no question about it.

[@Gatitasecsii]

She actually said she could do it better immediately after saying she didn't know how to

[@k54254]

She had planned to frame up Johnny since Day 1.

[@shanedaley6236]

@@k54254 not sure about that with her personality disorder she loved him more then anything at some point towards the end that all changes to end him

[@k54254]

@@shanedaley6236 yes dear. But when we analyze the experts AH showed textbook signs of the personality disorder and it was manifested on how she carried herself on the witness stand. My own opinion though it will not matter is that indeed both JD and her tolerated their toxic relationship dynamics until such time someone totally snapped out of it🙂

[@tanhongyi7180]

She's trying to stack two arguments : One is the zero possibility of her knowing how to do it, second is LOWERING the possibility of her doing it this way if she could suggest doing better. She's blindly stacking arguments assuming more is better. What she doesn't realize is that both argument cancels out each other.

[@giuseppe6166]

This is fabulous, you are fabulous, why is this channel unavailable in the states?

[@RealCazTv]

I love the fact she always says oh I was on the plane as if you can’t just purchase Wi-Fi on the plan lol

[@protasiagwala6765]

Jesus this woman knows exactly what she’s talking about love it

[@goldengirl5165]

Camille Vasquez realized Amber is going off on a tangent and stops her there. Psychologists call that word salad where someone asks a question and the person that's answering the questions goes off on a tangent and never answers the question. It's to confuse the person asking the question but I feel because it's a court case, she's trying to make the jury forget about the question Vasquez just asked. I understand that's what narcissists do.

[@ninaappelt9001]

Like all Biden nominees.

[@cyncynn1357]

@@ninaappelt9001 tRump* I fixed it for ya!

[@jewels3846]

@@ninaappelt9001 you could say politicians but instead you decided to show bias. It happens on both sides but ignoring it on your side is naive and doesnt actually help progress any issues.

[@SoFeeYah01]

You’re right. It is what narcissists do

[@JCJW101]

I'd like to see a video on why so many journalists are trying to gaslight the public over this trial, it's absolutely shocking, maybe not for this channel though.

[@CrystalShadow]

I agree, it’s shocking. It maybe to do with who’s attending their sex parties because it just makes no sense

[@michelebliss5431]

This was such a brilliant legal assessment, that I decided to subscribe to your channel, even though I live in the US.

[@RealTico]

We would absolutely love to see your reactions to a few more clips from this trial! Johnny vs Rottenborn, experts testimonies, ect. First time watching The Legal Queen and truly enjoying it! :) Thank you!

[@CazzyB1]

Poor JD, he'd just discovered that his agents had stolen millions from him. I'd be banging cupboards and punching doors too if that happened to me. That was the context of his anger but AH still tried to make it about her. Classic narcissist.

[@Wagoo]

Not to mention his mother had just passed away..

[@toditron]

Why did the UK system fail so badly at this case with much of the same evidence?

[@Ghoulza]

different trail, it was johnny vs a newspaper, not johnny vs amber. johnny had to prove the newspaper knew it was fake before they published which is very difficult to do

[@AcousticTelevisions]

@@Ghoulza true. As well as come questionable decisions by the judge in allowing certain evidence without question - the Blackbeltbarrister explained a bit of it on LegalBytes live stream of verdict watch day 1

[@lizroberts1569]

@@Ghoulza I imagine it would be difficult to charge her with perjury as they’d have to drill down on every comment, and offer proof.

[@Ghoulza]

@@lizroberts1569 not really, based on what she's said in this trial vs video evidence from the last trial there is clear evidence of perjury. thing is whether it's worth pursuing. if they win it's honestly not worth it, if they lose still not really worth it.

[@reflections_with_Shay]

I love the way how your mum speaks. Can she do more of this please?

[@gaelablake2692]

This was in my KZbin feed and I have truly enjoyed this vid. It seems genuine and not malicious in anyway. Thank you for sharing content. This was refreshing.

[@j_vasey]

“Vasquez is over here” that’s the jury where you indicated. When she is asked a question she looks at Vasquez, then when answering she looks at the jury it’s really odd.

[@NateWilliams190]

When family and friends tire of challenging an habitual liar, the habitual liar comes to believe they're just that good of a liar and go through life lying. Usually, it's irrelevant because people in their orbit ignore or discount what they say; but, when it really matters, like in court, these liars experience a rude awakening.

[@lazylady880]

When she looks to the right she is looking at the jury. Camille is in the front.

[@raveclo9924]

The camera is probably inverted for her that’s why

[@pursuitolikes5217]

Yes, she's trying to appeal to the jury, so consistently turns to look at them.

[@Quark.Lepton]

People-Vasquez is not pronounced “Vaskwez”, it’s pronounced as Vas’kez’ both here in the US and in Mexico. But great summary folks-thanks!

[@evilloki85]

Not once in the trial Amber's lawyer pronounced it correctly despite her last name being pronounced correctly various times. That annoyed me to no end.🤣

[@16MedicRN]

Unresponsive means not answering the question. When Amber said, 'Why would I be (afraid)?' I sooo wish Camille had simply said, 'Indeed, Ms. Heard', lol 😂 Camille was the BOSS at leaving statements hanging. Also, a brilliant way to save on their time, as a whole.

[@darlaaddams7169]

You are making an excelent point. As a person who’s gone through DV did I record fights sometimes to have evidence of the abuse? Yes. Was I shaking, terrified? YES. I pressed record and was praying For the best. You always have in your mind what if this time something really bad happens.. and that is gonna show in the recording naturally, not because of acting or making it up putting the other party in a staged situation like AH did in the cabinet video.. Amber did not sound scared, terrified at all. There was one audio where it sounds like Johnny wants to self harm but we don’t know for sure, where we could hear some worry in her voice but she could have been acting since she was the one recording. If you are trying to record someone with a malicious intention of course you gonna stage yourself as the good guy, the worried one, that was what I heard from AH and not the voice and behavior of an abused woman and in no way I want her to represent me and the millions of abused women anywhere.

[@sammyg6387]

Ooo I absolutely love these videos….. please do some more, it’s fascinating hearing your thoughts on this trial👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

[@Thisismyaccount82]

4:30 “what ACTUAL domestic survivor wants that” why is she saying Actual if she claims to be one. I am one and I don’t say I am an ACTUAL survivor no I say I am a survivor.

[@tm13tube]

Camille has an organized brain. Cannot say the same about Amber. Amber has two sets of information to keep track of, the lies and the truth.

[@vanessarojas2793]

OMG! I'm blown away by how clever you are! You are such a great lawyer :)

[@shannont390]

I’ve been stumped as to why she even went to the courthouse that day. TRO or ERO does not ever put the complainant in front of a judge. You literally fill out your court request for relief from abuse attach your affidavit and wait for a judge inside their chambers to agree to the temporary order (usually up to 10 days) or they deny it. There is a celebrity entrance and exit which was not used. There was no face to face with a judge AND TRO are for imminent harm only. No marks on face prior to court appearance. No marks after court appearance and no RO ordered after the initial 10 day meaning she didn’t meet the criteria in front of a judge for a real in person restraining order.everything about this is suspicious. Not how US restraining orders work at all

[@SamSolasdonSaol]

Vas-kez is the correct pronunciation of Camille's last name. (Don't want ya to be accused of pronouncing like Elaine) 💞 Love your 2¢

[@Wagoo]

The pronunciation is burned into most of our brains already from the film Aliens :D

[@SamSolasdonSaol]

@Nic B You're not alone.

[@nats2976]

it's a Spanish surname, both pronunciations a likely to be wrong

[@SamSolasdonSaol]

@@nats2976 I'm going by how Camille pronounces her OWN last name. Shall I call you Nuts instead of Nats? I don't think so. Your 2¢ is silly.

[@killereverb3928]

Nicely done my dear. Notwithstanding the UK Court did a poor job in the trial against The Sun I thoroughly enjoyed your perspective and insights. As an American Civil litigator I’m always interested in the opinions and observations of lawyers from across the pond. Cheers!

[@bababooey.26]

i love how this video got recommended to me so i watched it and liked it, so i click your channel to watch more and i can’t 🙄 youtube says it’s not allowed in my country… so why did they let me enjoy your content but now i can’t binge anymore of it?!?! ugh youtube sucks 😭

[@Goldenfeather77]

Camille is a great attorney. The whole legal team was above and beyond.

[@jewels3846]

I agree about the being weirdly calm about recording. All my recordings come from my abuser making sure he could access all my electronics remotely but everything had to be set up by me so I actually have all those records saved still. Never once did it occur to me in the moment to record the scenario even after 5 years of abuse. I got out by luck that he left because he said having a lesbian friend was as bad as cheating with a man and i refused to drop my friends. I thank my lucky stars every day I got out from his manipulative abuse