Electrochemistry - Free Formula Sheet: bit.ly/3NLeylq Chemistry 2 Final Exam Review: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ooTQe4FnlNqJpqs Chemistry PDF Worksheets: www.video-tutor.net/chemistry-basic-introduction.html Next Video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/n4jUhoqtrrWeidU
@MATHBOSS2873 жыл бұрын
for years people have been wanting to see the owner of this golden voice
@berchin893 жыл бұрын
fax
@Engr92 жыл бұрын
When do you think he will reveal his face?
@asapstudy60652 жыл бұрын
True 😢 like just tell the username !! We will find you
@lalalanding2342 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ezudinezere60342 жыл бұрын
For years people have been wanting to hear the voice of this golden typer😜😜
@jonathanmendoza31546 жыл бұрын
dude, you legit explain things much better than my professor and my two textbooks combined together.
@RB-nh1om4 жыл бұрын
100% it only took me 5 minutes of this video to understand the whole thing. Teachers need to learn from this guy
@Guy_OFFICIAL3 жыл бұрын
@Idris Jalen wow my account got hacked in the process because instapwn is a total scam!
@incognito67513 жыл бұрын
@@Guy_OFFICIAL Both of these accounts are bots which were created at the same time to make Instapwn appear more authentic.
@_minus.X3RO2 жыл бұрын
lets clone him and let the clones replace all teacher on the planet... For a brighter future!
@Feyangel234 жыл бұрын
For anyone wondering why at 7:40 the answer is -2.20V it's because electrolytic cells can have negative cell potentials which is the difference between galvonic cells. When electrolytic cells have negative cell potential values they need energy to run. It's like when your smartphone is dead; you need to recharge it first before it can run again
@starsuperville68634 жыл бұрын
thanks!
@antoniojosiahphilipm.78174 жыл бұрын
How did u get -2.20V at problem 3?
@happy88713 жыл бұрын
THANKS!
@Ibnblackbird6 күн бұрын
God bless your soul for pointing this out!!!
@n.kxznnn6 жыл бұрын
this channel is legit helping me a lot with all my struggles in chem.
@sangeetakala17975 жыл бұрын
Me too
@srinidhi3106 Жыл бұрын
Fr
@nicolezalesak62814 жыл бұрын
I hope you aren't sick of hearing this; THANK YOU!!! I was stuck on this unit for two days. Your explanations are very clear and concise.
@jesus_saves_15 Жыл бұрын
Me too I was stuck and couldn't skip it either and he came and saved me
@tbdrosa85423 жыл бұрын
another neat way to determine which cell potential is "flipped" is which is more negative. The more negative a cell potential is, the more it wishes to be oxidized. And when we oxidize reactions in problems similar to these we will flip the reaction, which also can flip the sign to its corresponding reduction potential
@shan86132 жыл бұрын
Thanks!!!
@ISRAELCHERINET5 күн бұрын
Tnx
@kronosthewarrior92054 жыл бұрын
Thank you dude you are saving me from having anxiety attacks. Thank you thank you thank you.
@amina234147 ай бұрын
Now we are in 2024 and i'm watching ur vidéos all i want to say to you it's just you're perfect and thaaaaaank you for everything😻
@Quote_It_official6 ай бұрын
6 years and this is still golden.....i hope next generation finds this helpful too
@Lol98-wk183 жыл бұрын
Do you know how many lives you’re saving by making these videos ? 🥺 thank you so much 😭😭
@georgesadler7830Ай бұрын
Professor Organic Chemistry Tutor, thank you for showing How to analyze and calculate cell potential of a galvanic cell/ electrolytic cell in AP/General Chemistry. In this video, the examples are simple to follow and understand from start to finish. This is an error free video/lecture on KZbin TV with the Organic Chemistry Tutor.
@zancrowc96423 жыл бұрын
Im 10 min this guys explain 4 lessons better than a "AP chem" teacher did in combined of 4-5 hours =_=
@kingdomheartsroxas995 жыл бұрын
First three seconds and you already answered my question I had thanks man!!!
@fauzansyauqi28154 жыл бұрын
so fast huh
@adamc46402 жыл бұрын
fr so simple and i was wondering that after like 2 assignments and test tmr
@mysussyisnotbaka2 жыл бұрын
Sus
@ramao796153 жыл бұрын
the way he says reaction🥺❤️3:41
@ankledrew81505 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Using you for entrace test. Happy teacher's day!
@antyey6437 Жыл бұрын
Thank you, I can't describe how much I appreciate the lessons you give us.
@elegiacleena Жыл бұрын
Never knew that a study ASMR also exists ❤
@johndawson60575 жыл бұрын
You're the best man. I friggin' love you!
@sangeetakala17975 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@HimanshuRaj-ry2gx5 жыл бұрын
You gay
@sangeetakala17975 жыл бұрын
@@HimanshuRaj-ry2gx to whom are u saying that??? 🤔🤔🤔
@aleks4564 жыл бұрын
Bro quit dreaming
@fawazali84904 жыл бұрын
The heros we need (sakht launda)
@Cryptomaniac7193 жыл бұрын
I’m studying chemistry in Greece and your videos are amazingly helpful..Thank you ;) !!!
@alirezasadeghifar38154 жыл бұрын
I love your voice! Your videos are so helpful!
@nofacefreak89865 жыл бұрын
You just explained what my teacher told us in 1 and half hour in freaking 10 mins
@sumaiyarashid89305 жыл бұрын
true dat my teacher just confused me so much that i had to revisit the whole thing again
@arexqui6256 жыл бұрын
In Standard cell potential don't we subtract the cell potential of cathode from anode as per formula?
@shubhamsinghhh996 жыл бұрын
Bkr video h nhi hai isko knowledge
@chisomovuegbe42485 жыл бұрын
Mohammad nasir you do, but he reversed one of the reactions, that’s why he still got the correct answer despite adding them.
@manishbarnwal38164 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamsinghhh99 I think you should check yourself before accusing him.
@jerymarschmid61764 жыл бұрын
yeap it should, that's how is shown on the books
@thabangmoloi15534 жыл бұрын
His half rxn are standard hence he can choose to reverse the other one
@arielwise96643 жыл бұрын
what do you do when you're not told if it's electrolytic or galvanic?
@JulianHernandez-bt7il3 жыл бұрын
"A standard cell potential has to be positive" can't believe my professor never mentioned that in lecture man haha
@avationmusic3 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind when he says that it has to be positive, he means the overall potential for the entire cell, and it only applies to galvanic cells. Electrolytic cells can be negative because they are powered by an external source. You can also use the value of the cell potential to determine if the reaction will be in equilibrium (Ecell = 0) or if it’s spontaneous (Ecell = positive) or non-spontaneous (Ecell = negative). Hopefully you knew this already but I’m adding it just in case :)
@AverageMED2 жыл бұрын
@@avationmusic can an electrolytic cell be positive?? I am having a hard time wondering why they ever would be
@user-pr5py8cw9x2 жыл бұрын
@@AverageMED He's wrong. An electrolytic cell, by definition, has a negative Ecell. Always negative. Never positive. First time I've seen him make a big mistake in a video.
@AverageMED2 жыл бұрын
@@user-pr5py8cw9x yeah i was gonna say by definition it has to be negative
@sneha39274 жыл бұрын
Explanation was too simple.... Thanks 😊
@CaptainKanundrum3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video, it is exactly what I was looking for! One question: for cases like Ag/Mg reaction, why does multiplying the Ag equation by 2 not change the cell potential at all? I keep thinking that if I have to move twice as many electrons, the potential should double.
@arhamralam2 жыл бұрын
Cell potential is an intensive property, so it will not change even if the number of moles vary.
@xii-cb.s.gokulakannan19452 жыл бұрын
hi dude the basic thing of this chapter is electrode potential do not change with how many moles , pressure , temperature you add the ep donot change . i think my answer would clear your doubt .
@srinuchandaka39594 жыл бұрын
Thank you!!! *Organic Chemistry Tutor*
@jesus_saves_15 Жыл бұрын
You don't know how much thankful I am .. i understood many other stuff too Thank you ❤
@davidcherilus91123 жыл бұрын
Can anyone explain equation 3 ? Thank you. In contrast to a galvanic cell,the most positive standard reduction half reaction within an electrolytic cell is the one that experiences oxidation. With that in mind, Why did he reverse iron half reaction and not the Br half reaction (where Br would be our anode and Fe be our cathode? Ered of cathode - E red of anode.
@catastrophicdemon9493 жыл бұрын
Br is the one receiving the electron therefore it is a reduction and Fe is losing electron therefore it’s a oxidation. Knowing that reduction is cathode and oxidation is anode. Using the formula Ered-Eox or Ecathode - Eanode = 1.09-(0.77) which is 0.32
@ShubhraShandilya295 жыл бұрын
Explained wonderfully! Thanks!!
@somasch75522 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH ILY YOU ARE SAVING MY GRADES
@kashrathore31465 жыл бұрын
How did u get -2.20 ..I got +2.20 in the last question
@mohammadrezasharghi86488 ай бұрын
In an electrolytic cell, you have to put in energy to do the electrolysis, so Gibbs free energy is positive here, which means cell potential needs to be negative, not positive.
@artswithus2622 жыл бұрын
I like ur way of speaking .You are just fabulous.👍👍👍👍👏👏👏
@fluffyflooff32703 жыл бұрын
Thankss! Ezpz to understand ur explanation ! My brain feels relaxed now😃 hopefully i will get my quiz n test excellent marks!🥺
@joshm82564 жыл бұрын
1 bit of constructive feedback: invest in a quality microphone. I love your videos; you are great at explaining things.
@pydipaparao53796 жыл бұрын
should we multiply the E°cell value when equation is being multiplied?
@TheKennethfilm4 жыл бұрын
No since the standard potential is in volts and not in volts/mole.
@7dnein9442 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for this my friend, much obliged
@1messi_THEGOAT6 күн бұрын
I can’t believe this appeared after just throwing such question yesterday during chemistry exams 😢
@freezer-monkey Жыл бұрын
Bro this guy is a better teacher then my actual teacher
@atttomole2 жыл бұрын
Interesting. It’s a bit confusing when it comes to the redox flow battery. Can you do it for iron redox flow battery reactions.
@anvayaiyer56143 жыл бұрын
You saved me some tears... Yet again
@themaninred73524 жыл бұрын
Hi question, does molarity of the substances affect the cell potential?
@jarodhans37584 жыл бұрын
yes it does. for calculating cell potential in standard conditions (1M) use the method in this video. for concentrations other than 1M use nernst equation
@zoudek1234 жыл бұрын
In 10:56, +109, pls tell me how to get that number..
@Sammi-nm8bg4 жыл бұрын
dude. if i had a million bucks i would give it all to you
@Ρατζ6 жыл бұрын
You are best ... India 🇮🇳
@sneharyan97015 жыл бұрын
Where the hell comes india man.. can you see anybody commenting usa france Germany etc.. don't make india look bad because of your stupidity. . I am indian also but for god sake don't write everywhere i am from india love from india
@Villainous12 Жыл бұрын
U are a legend professor. God bless U😇😇
@ab123tube42 жыл бұрын
Great.please make video how to affect using active and inert electrode on the product of electrolysis
@BrownCookieBoy5 жыл бұрын
First you say the cell potential has to be positive, then you introduce a nonspontaneous reaction (were the potential is negative) without explaining. Im confused. So i wouldve had the wrong answer if i flipped the Standard for aluminum so i could do 1,66 - 0,535?
@giordicsaga5 жыл бұрын
same here! XP
@iubescman5 жыл бұрын
for galvanic cell, that's the rule that it must be positive. in electrolytic cell it can be either
@sangeetakala17975 жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation dude 👏👏👏👏👍👍👍👌👌👌👌
@frankthetank87485 жыл бұрын
please dont ever stop making videos please
@sajjadkazemi61866 жыл бұрын
You are a real teacher! Thanks!!!❤️
@sanchitbolinjkar82914 жыл бұрын
Electrode potential is an intensive property and non additive in nature so we can't directly add it the way you did. Instead what we have to do is add all the reactions and equate it's Gibbs free energy to the final free energy. Could you pls solve this confusion for me?
@moonandtanu75912 жыл бұрын
Yea thats what im thinking
@lanercat36Ай бұрын
Oohhh!!! I get it!! Light bulb. Thank you so much!!
@ethioupdatedinfo.5 жыл бұрын
On question 3) (7:35) you don't multiply Fe^2+ potential by two. So the overall result should be -0.45v not +0.32v. If this is the answer why galvanic cell result negative?
@nahuelfernandez41905 жыл бұрын
because its asking for an electrolytic cell.
@nurulhdm23 күн бұрын
Question- why the volts are added together inside of subtracting it? Wouldnt you be incorporating based on the following emf formula E cell= E cathode - E anode instead?
@ritapatel92466 жыл бұрын
This is awesome way to understand... Thanks👍👍👌👌
@venusz61344 жыл бұрын
hmm I'm not quite understanding how he got +0.21V for Q2. After reversing the iron's rxn, it becomes an oxidation (anode) with E= +0.44. So should it be: E cell = E cat - E ano = -0.23 - 0.44 which is
@sandeepsammy94804 жыл бұрын
Even I have the same doudt and going through the comments...so that anyone can reply me .
@sandeepsammy94804 жыл бұрын
If your doudt has clarified .. can you please tell ?
@venusz61344 жыл бұрын
@@sandeepsammy9480 Sure thing. For this question, it'd be helpful to arrange the half-rxns in the decreasing order of standard cell potential values - we will have Ni (-0.23V) then Fe (-0,44V) so Ni+2 rxn is reduction (cathode) and Fe+2 is oxidation (anode). The formula (Cathode - Anode) works according to the standard potential values of reduction half-rxn. Thus, since anode = -0.44, Cathode - Anode = -0.23 - (-0.44) = 0.23 + 0.44. Hope this helps :)
@venusz61344 жыл бұрын
@@sandeepsammy9480 Also it's a galvanic cell meaning Cathode - Anode always > 0
@sandeepsammy94804 жыл бұрын
@@venusz6134 thankyou ...I understood ..thanks for the clarification
@ridhima193316 күн бұрын
Thank u so much sir, u cleared my confusion
@anivaldosambo73944 жыл бұрын
YOU SAVED ME AGAIN!!!
@Bohnr3 жыл бұрын
I always have to speed these up, but good stuff
@catewebb64302 жыл бұрын
loving this content
@nourahd69946 жыл бұрын
Why i didnt watch your videos a couple of years ago 😣
@sangeetakala17975 жыл бұрын
Seriously man🙁🙁🙁🙁
@adinahojda66694 жыл бұрын
when we calculate the cell potential we have to do subtraction. The formula is cathode - anode. In the first example you added the values and now i am confused.
@ayushdudhani4 жыл бұрын
In that formula we use reducation potential where as he used oxidation and red potential respectively
@allandumagay99084 жыл бұрын
Bro +0.80-(-2.37)=+0.80+(2.37) Still the same bro.
@punishmentbegins6 жыл бұрын
You're the best! Thank you.
@rajendrakumarmakwana89414 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much God 😇🙏👼 bless you all😄😇
@govindarajuankadala85634 жыл бұрын
Best explanation
@sajidmehmood69766 жыл бұрын
Dont you think when we subtract one from other with opposite charge the net result with sign of those which is larger term...as you did in case of secnd e.g ...suggest me please
@sajidmehmood69766 жыл бұрын
As in Ni and Fe eg. The net sign is negatve... I have read this eg in another book with Ni used as oxidation
@nathanmulopo93666 жыл бұрын
@@sajidmehmood6976 If Ni is used as oxidation it's wrong cause with half - reactions, one half - reaction must be reduced and the other oxidized . Both of them can't be oxidized. Fe is already oxidized
@lizardis89 Жыл бұрын
I learned in class the formula for ecell was to subtract ecathode and eanode? Can you explain why you are adding them?
@101nevergiveup8 ай бұрын
This is the same problem I'm facing 😭
@atlma26 жыл бұрын
Should the cell potential for electrolytic cells always be negative (so deltaG is +) since its nonspontaneous via the equation G = -nFE?
@johnhopley1545 жыл бұрын
yes my same thoughts. especially for the Br2 2Fe2+ one he does at like 7:30
@antoniojosiahphilipm.78174 жыл бұрын
Saeemm
@brennan78462 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to know if the balancing of the electrons changed the cell potential for my homework. Thankfully I have found somewhere where it says that it does not change. Where else can I find the answer to this question? Like actually I was surfing this channels videos to find this answer.
@bbboyyy513 жыл бұрын
Please tell me why souldn't we need to balance the last example?
@rosey53573 жыл бұрын
omgg thank you so much! This literally helped me alot!
@stevencheng79973 жыл бұрын
10:14 isn't it -1.12 , because e cell= e reduction - e oxidation??? I am so confused
@tomato74533 жыл бұрын
might be a little late, but its -2.2 because its not a galvanic cell. So the value can be negative. He added the cell potential for both (like in the others). Both equations work but the addition is when you are switching around the half reactions (like in the video where he flips a half reaction and the V is flipped in turn)
@brianreyes58313 жыл бұрын
thanks for always making it all seem easy :))
@ruthkoi81654 жыл бұрын
Wow! Thanks man you're helping me alot ❤🙏
@wallflower18523 жыл бұрын
I wanna hug and kiss this guy. Thank you so much!
@lost_saint.7 ай бұрын
5:51 how did you get those cell potentials
@aliyaiffat52172 жыл бұрын
Forgalvanic cell cell potential hs to be positive. For electrolytic cell it can be negative positive or zero.
@nurislamshimul54026 жыл бұрын
clear lecture.... thank u
@biancafrancis77882 жыл бұрын
how did you come up with the reduction potentials?
@useful-__ Жыл бұрын
Sorry I need clearification on problem 3 as I think you didn't need to change the sign of the 0.77V to negative as the equations were in order.
@johnnyzheng4233 жыл бұрын
An easier and quicker way is looking at the electric potentials of both half reactions and picking the largest electric potential. That will be your Ecathode , so you can subtract that with the lower electric potential (your Eanode) to get your overall cell potential. For example, for #1 you pick the 0.8V since it is the larger number and subtract that with -2.37V which will give you 3.17V.
@sunny11097ify6 жыл бұрын
wait, isn't getting the cell potential of a galvanic cell done in a way in that, E(oxidation)-E(reduction)? And it seems like we do not gave to change the signs when flipping the equations around....
@ahmedader42832 жыл бұрын
Thankz 😭😰 u saved me
@pelebrapsgp4 ай бұрын
Do they often give equations along side😢.Here at my school you don't dare expect any cell equation💔. Please do a video for assigning which one should be oxidized or reduced when two elements are under consideration. Or send me a link if it is already available . That is just my challenge presently😢
@sumaiyarashid89305 жыл бұрын
this video was helpful
@mishal81 Жыл бұрын
thank you sm :) god bless u. sending love your way
@alphajohnalbert45174 жыл бұрын
Where did they get the value of Voltage?
@xtiiin44672 жыл бұрын
In your second example, why did you reverse Fe and not Ni?
@nathanmuni37454 жыл бұрын
How do we know which reaction we have to reverse??? Either one or two 🤔🤔
@omsingharjit4 жыл бұрын
Why cell potential of lead acid battery is 2volt if lead and sulpher potential is much lower ????
@Fifi004165 жыл бұрын
i was soooo confused, thank you sooooo much
@khnithhgor96983 жыл бұрын
when the electrons are present on the same side then which reaction is to be inversed and on what basis?
@andrewquintana20683 жыл бұрын
If a galvanic cell, invert the reaction that will result in a positive E. If an electrolytic cell, it depends what they are looking for. The "E" can be negative, positive, or zero. Thus it doesn't matter which you invert.
@jameschem Жыл бұрын
The question 4 was kinda weird to me, hope you could explain more
@binodanandbipin59605 жыл бұрын
Do we have to remember the data as you have shown in example 3..
@fable99584 жыл бұрын
Question 3 is wrong. It states that its an electrolytic cell but has a positive value for standard potential value. That will result in negative value for delta G meaning its spontaneous. Electrolytic cells are supposed to be non spontaneous. Maybe that question should I have stated that is a voltaic/galvanic cell question.
@charitydoeses5 жыл бұрын
But the last examples answer doesn't make sense because you said the Ecell value should always be positive?? Help
@evwerenisaacoghenenyerhovw232 Жыл бұрын
Sir , please I'm confused..... Is E cell= Ereduction - E oxidation How come did u just add together instead of subtracting please explain cos I'm kinda confused
@JohnMcCaine-oo2uo Жыл бұрын
Both ways are correct, it depends on what you've been taught.
@evwerenisaacoghenenyerhovw232 Жыл бұрын
It didn't gave me same answer sir
@JohnMcCaine-oo2uo Жыл бұрын
@@evwerenisaacoghenenyerhovw232 Have you tried to check if the oxidation sign is supposed to be reversed or not? + or -
@passthejay10 ай бұрын
Subtracting a positive number is the same as adding a negative number
@anonimuselleАй бұрын
i dont understand?? i thought you dont reverse the signs of Ecathode and Eanode, you use reduction potentials directly in the formula