Constructive criticism: The explanation would be better if we could hear the sound of the chords and melodies that are being displayed on the screen. Those who do not have any piano around, cannot imagine what all of this sounds like. You could also write the name of the chords and notes below the stave. Greetings from Catalonia.
@decipheringguitarmusictheory7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that. Noted
@burtshort99006 жыл бұрын
Androux Guitar that makes too much sense.
@AEFic6 жыл бұрын
Yeah that was pretty frustrating
@lennartjakobs1213 Жыл бұрын
Best analysis I've seen so far! Clear and concise information in a re-watchable format. Thanks a lot!
@decipheringguitarmusictheory Жыл бұрын
You're welcome Lennart Jakobs. Thanks for watching
@thormusique9 ай бұрын
This is so concisely and brilliantly laid out, cheers!
@decipheringguitarmusictheory9 ай бұрын
You're welcome
@innocentoctave7 жыл бұрын
Excellent content. Presentation a little dry and monotonous. A few musical illustrations would have been welcome. Subscribed.
@PeopleR2sensitive7 жыл бұрын
flight of the coltranes over here
@jeffcrusan21026 жыл бұрын
Very clearly explained -- not only for people who want to analyze music but for people who want to write it as well.
@decipheringguitarmusictheory6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jeff!
@fingerstyleguitarjournal95935 жыл бұрын
I'm very impressed by this and look forward to watching and studying more. Thanks so much for doing this.
@decipheringguitarmusictheory5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome. Glad you found it useful. Thanks for the comment
@7thson3413 жыл бұрын
AH I GET IT!! you want me to get off my ass and grab mah darn instrument so my music-ILITERATE ASS can figure out how those scales sounds!! no easy way outta this one. what principality! i like it!
@robbes7rh3 жыл бұрын
Useful? Definitely. Powerfully illuminating and epiphanous? Big time! Key concepts in physics are explained by invariance and symmetries. Considering that the field of physics began with the investigation of pitch and harmony, it seems fitting that underlying structures in music can be understood and explained by these same very principles.
@decipheringguitarmusictheory3 жыл бұрын
Yes, there has always been a relationship between music and other fields. Fascinating how it all ties in. Thanks for the comment
@urzathehappy722 жыл бұрын
Wow alot of great info packed into this video. Plz add the music next time tho since my sight reading is very basic
@decipheringguitarmusictheory2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Roger [kirkbydudelol] Waters, yes my later videos have the music. Thanks for the comment
@royercrafter5 жыл бұрын
This was a great explanation, not only do you explain what the theoretical framework of what the changes do, but you also give some useful examples to get your gears going! Thanks
@decipheringguitarmusictheory5 жыл бұрын
You're welcome. Thanks for the comment
@halasimov13623 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the Big Step by Step!
@decipheringguitarmusictheory3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@unsatura3 жыл бұрын
can't wait to try it out ... thanks
@decipheringguitarmusictheory3 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@rockingbuddah6 жыл бұрын
Great video!!
@decipheringguitarmusictheory6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Ivan. Appreciate the comment
@robertaguirre86327 жыл бұрын
great stuff!
@Kosmo9997 жыл бұрын
Comic sans!
@robertaguirre86327 жыл бұрын
but it is not an equal division of the Octave. It is composed of 2 Major 3rds and a Spetimal Major 3rd. But when the Augmented Triad completes the Octave it is actually using 2 Major 3rds and a Spetimal Major 3rd. A Major 3rd is 386c. 386+386+386 = 1158 And so 3 stacked Major 3rds is 42 cents short of the Octave. 42 cents is the Septimal Diesis. 386+386= 772 1200-772= 428 and 428 cents is the space of the Spetimal Major 3rd with a harmonic ratio of 9:7 *The Septimal Major 3rd is actually closer to 435cents. the reason that there is space between 435 and 428 is due to yet another diesis.
@decipheringguitarmusictheory7 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this
@wyc7tjmf7947 жыл бұрын
Robert Aguirre Well, I guess it is quite clear from the video that he talks about equal division of the octave in the context of 12-ET. An interesting point anyway though.
@EllieMcEla7 жыл бұрын
well the simple ratios are irrelevant when discussing jazz theory where everything is based in 12ET. would be fun to hear this piece in just intonation though
@gottliebfischer57207 жыл бұрын
Coltrane was thinking more about Slonimski, search the thesaurus by Nicolas Slonimski is really good
@andres-quezada7 жыл бұрын
thank you, very well explained :)
@decipheringguitarmusictheory7 жыл бұрын
You're welcome
@Rheologist6 жыл бұрын
Lmao comic sans
@markusschultz46377 жыл бұрын
Is the uploader British?
@decipheringguitarmusictheory7 жыл бұрын
No, from New Zealand
@HADJEE6 жыл бұрын
I think that he is from New Zealand.
@williamwinslow65826 жыл бұрын
I could tell because a fan of Flight of the Conchords.