That’s the point. You tell each side the other is the enemy so it might aswell be yellow as blue is lying to both
@Grievous_Nix4 ай бұрын
Maximum realism
@RazorWinter4 ай бұрын
Confuse the enemy with colorblind statements. The strategy is so good it also confuses the people watching this video.
@thevoteman4 ай бұрын
@@adamkerslake1465no the point is he put the wrong color
@copper_corgi4 ай бұрын
This series feels like "The Art of War for dummies" and I'm here for it
@xerxerxo03844 ай бұрын
The Art of War is nothing like this video
@ibrahimhassan7114 ай бұрын
@@xerxerxo0384 I disagree "salami slicing" is pretty similar to Don't over-extend. "BSIA" is a lot like using the environment to your advantage, i.e. eating off the land. " Inkspot" fits rather well with utilizing the terrain, you've got to pick the correct locations to establish safe zones or risk being overrun in counterattacks. This video complements The Art of War pretty well. To deny any relation or overlap would be a pretty harsh assessment.
@Captaincapi2774 ай бұрын
Well you feel wrong
@GAMER123GAMING4 ай бұрын
But its not because its not about The Art of War
@xerxerxo03844 ай бұрын
@@ibrahimhassan711 This video is more tactical, the Art of War is strategic
@8MinutesExplainer4 ай бұрын
Here is what i like about this channel: 1: Gets straight to the point 2: No interruptions 3: Gives you all the information quickly 4: Doesn't drag on
@SHXRWOOD4 ай бұрын
Mate shut up, You run a failing rip-off channel of this masterpiece
@avivastudios23113 ай бұрын
It's literally the best channel on KZbin. No one else does it like this. 😁
@Toadey2012Ай бұрын
Boi so many ytbers be like that
@cornintime62714 ай бұрын
winning the minecraft pvp w this one! 🔥🔥
@Roarables4 ай бұрын
stoneworks
@Imam14-q6y3 ай бұрын
Yah
@arandomcommenter-mc8yl3 ай бұрын
Needing this for a team war lmao
@arandomcommenter-mc8yl3 ай бұрын
Nvm we lost:(
@zionicnight53063 ай бұрын
i walk to my enemy and they die idk. they just do
@notusneo4 ай бұрын
Remember that the first rule of war is to have fun
@me_12-vw1vi3 ай бұрын
second rule of war: first rule of war is fake 😔
@Wavy_Gravy2 ай бұрын
The true spoils were the frenemies we made along the way.
@Leongon3 ай бұрын
The decapitation strategy has proven really easy to backfire when used against cartels and other organized crime for example, because the replacing in command is often unwise and aims to take control by force, by proving to be tough and ruthless, thus is makes things worse as not that organization survives but makes decisions based on intimidation first making people suffer excessively, while the previous leader often was taking care of the population and controlling the amount of damage they were doing to the area they had control over so have some level of consensual support from civilians.
@1AmGroot4 ай бұрын
You should do "Every Olympic Sport"
@WilliamAlexander-u5q3 ай бұрын
Agreed
@angon253 ай бұрын
Excluding breakdance obviously
@lwo77364 ай бұрын
"salami slicing" is VERY relevant right now
@caliguladeux4 ай бұрын
Talking about this is antisemitic /s
@erhan12554 ай бұрын
Russia
@9x39mm.4 ай бұрын
@@caliguladeux "oy vey you cant say anything negative about israel goy. you wouldnt want to be an antisemite would you?"
@oldmanryss4 ай бұрын
this is what China has been doing to the Philippines
@ADNAN-sw9lg4 ай бұрын
Israel
@IERServer4 ай бұрын
I like using shock and awe in videogames, ngl, usually sacrificing defense for the strongest attack.
@CalvinLee6064 ай бұрын
It’s the best strategy when you don’t care about collateral damage.
@IERServer4 ай бұрын
@@CalvinLee606 Exactly.
@cumunist21204 ай бұрын
I tend to play weaker countries/factions so maneuver warfare is the way to go for me I like seeing the enemy struggle as I know out their infrastructure
@addisonwelsh3 ай бұрын
Attrition. Doesn’t matter the scenario, I will always go with attrition. Sooner or later the other guy smashes his keyboard and storms away.
@javieralejandrotrianapaz63433 ай бұрын
@@addisonwelsh I salute your patience but i ain't got no time for that and I'd like to win in a faster, more decisive conflict.
@ThePixelman04084 ай бұрын
I love this channel it explains everything so clearly with no fluff
@kovacs81gabor4 ай бұрын
I learned about salami slicing becouse during the early years of communism in my country, the main party kind of ate the other smaller parties one by one, slowly creating a state with only one possible party to vote for becouse party creation was also banned outside already existing ones, of which there was only one I also learned about the fabian strategy thanks to oversimplified's second punic war video
@sebastianrivera95373 ай бұрын
What country?
@kovacs81gabor3 ай бұрын
Hungary under the rule of Mátyás Rákosi
@delano45263 ай бұрын
@@kovacs81gaborWas it before or after the revolution
@kovacs81gabor3 ай бұрын
@@delano4526 they did the salami slicing before, undid it when Imre Nagy was in charge, then redone it, then came the revolution
@Galaxy-o2e3 ай бұрын
0:44 Not only that but a lot of militaries trained their non-senior members to be independent and take on the initiative
@sunrisejackdaw177923 күн бұрын
There's also the strategic strike problem. Often forces will have contingency plans specifically designed around C2 incapacitation...
@georgekalule95903 ай бұрын
I love how bait and bleed is just fancy third partying 😂
@ireallycant44166 күн бұрын
Islamic wars be like
@ender66593 ай бұрын
every RTS gamer must see this
@ОлегОледович4 күн бұрын
We need all cheesy RTS tactics. Kirov rush and ololo armies
@twylanaythias3 ай бұрын
Technically, ALL warfare is attrition - the end goal is to render your enemy unable (or unwilling) to continue fighting. Combat casualties, fortification failures, stealing/stopping supplies, or just drastic demoralization, the aim is to persuade your enemy that they cannot possibly win.
@delano45263 ай бұрын
A more powerful country can still be defeated early on to achieve victory even if they have more resources. Although you could say all warfare is logistics.
@delano45263 ай бұрын
One good example would be France in WW2. Industrially and logistically they were about on par with Germany, but their strategy and equipment was 30 years old.
@albabhuzaifa68533 ай бұрын
The colours used to represent salami slicing are very subtle. U are amazing keep it up! Love from Bangladesh
@Ekklo4 ай бұрын
The different studies of mathematics would be neat...also I am a math teacher, so there's that reason as well.
@jayymorris52854 ай бұрын
Or science haha
@sonalikshirsagar2293 күн бұрын
NO WAY A MATH TEACHER WATCHES KZbin AND HAS A OCTOPUS PFP
@abrahamlincoln16002 күн бұрын
@@sonalikshirsagar229the tentacles equate to a specific numeric value, so of course he has an OCTopus PFP!
@Syrenkai5 күн бұрын
Annihilation was also used rather notably by the Qin dynasty in the warring states period. Ancient warwise it was a legitimately breathtaking loss of life with around 650k dead to include 400k of the 450k brought by the Zhao in one battle creating an absolutely unrecoverable manpower shortage and their loss of the war.
@genocide91834 ай бұрын
My sister's not gonna know what hit her
@Psychonaut1654 ай бұрын
Be careful she might hit you with the salami slicer.
@Wyi-the-rogue4 ай бұрын
Oh god
@iamaloafofbread89264 ай бұрын
God speed, sir 🫡
@ShhhhhhOG3 ай бұрын
0:20 aka third party
@kristopherhayes19573 ай бұрын
Fortnite!!
@outtanowhere4023 ай бұрын
Decapitation ≠ Third Party
@tr3vsАй бұрын
@@outtanowhere402hes talking about the bait and bleed
@ThGuyOverThere4 ай бұрын
Great video! I think a video about the many types of hand held weapons (blunt/bladed/pointed) would be quite educational.
@idk_whatmynameis3 ай бұрын
They forgot about the classic strategies of carpet seiging, blockading, bombarding and save scumming :D
@makmet30244 ай бұрын
Hmm..interesting, I'm wondering where I heard of that before. 1:27
@maracmae53174 ай бұрын
Maybe somewhere in middle east.
@Sadiat-qg9yz4 ай бұрын
You mean isn'treæl strategy?
@muminssq83494 ай бұрын
I noticed that before.
@archysimpson22734 ай бұрын
It's what Russia was doing to Ukraine for years before it became well-known, right down to the defending our border argument.
@adalmeme86134 ай бұрын
The land grappin cult
@jkdking124 ай бұрын
I would love to see you use examples for more topics like you did for shock and awe. It would make understanding it easier.
@ibrahimhassan7114 ай бұрын
keep making military strategy videos, i want a part 3
@jawadsabih49793 ай бұрын
8:25 is what was utilised in the 2024 august kursk offensive
@BenderSnake2 күн бұрын
In theory yes, but it quickly devolved into another attrition front. I think maneuver warfare is truly dead thanks to drones, even Hezbollah is denying IDF the possibility to maneuver
@toedo90153 ай бұрын
2:46 Tiny correction: Fabian was dictator of the Roman Republic. He was elected as dictator for a limited time and stepped down after his time was up. The Roman Empire would first be formed around 200 years later.
@yoyosingh10884 ай бұрын
Why am I even watching this?
@prevail7774 ай бұрын
you are preparing for war
@vassalofthenight99454 ай бұрын
What for, we're gonna be meat fodder at best lol.
@42carlos4 ай бұрын
For the hoi4 skills
@joeysmith72964 ай бұрын
If the apocalypse happens, you can be a legendary leader
@ibrahimhassan7114 ай бұрын
@@joeysmith7296 I like how you think.
@Lejeron27 күн бұрын
Modern wars are mostly salami slicing. Public opinion can easily shift due to technology and media which is something that everyone in power would prefer to avoid.
@SIGNOR-G14 күн бұрын
I wouldnt really be so sure about the "prefer to avoid" argument. Even if they are found out what will you do? They are the guys with the guns after all.
@dimakapeev31564 ай бұрын
0:25 Decapitation also could create a martyr and harden the enemies' resolve to fight. That is why Russia does not strike at Zelensky, aiming to kill him
@RatsFunHouse1013 ай бұрын
Russia has literally attempted multiple assassinations on zelensky
@Bwubdle1983 ай бұрын
2:11 General Sherman says what
@6jpsalmsB-ne5jy2 ай бұрын
Napoleon: allow me to introduce myself
@jaysonp9426Ай бұрын
Hannibal has entered the chat
@thibs28374 ай бұрын
This one was great. Didn't you miss Defeat in Detail ?
@atig514 ай бұрын
He put it in another video
@azza35254 ай бұрын
I guess it’s classed as a tactic rather than a strategy
@thibs28374 ай бұрын
@@azza3525I'm pretty sure Defeat in Detail is a strategy not a tactic. I see its place with the others here.
@acceptablecasualty53194 ай бұрын
@@thibs2837Channel doesn't understand the difference between strategic, operational and tactical level.
@aminatandour5894 ай бұрын
@@thibs2837 it can be used as both. For example, napoleon used it as a strategy in Italy, whilst Alexander the Great used it as a tactic
@shadowhunter-sh9zj3 ай бұрын
Pincer strategy : forces first surround the area that they want to capture then attack from all sides Advantages : no escape for resisting forces and higher chance of success Disadvantages : only works if the military force has bigger numbers and a good geographical position Example : battle of Bukit Timah Hill (Singapore and UK vs Imperial Japan )
@shadowhunter-sh9zj3 ай бұрын
Chose your battle strategy : one side uses all their weapons in a very concentrated period that makes the opposing side consider if they just want to surrender as the war may be to costly or result in way too many deaths Advantages : this strategy can be used regardless of military strength Disadvantages : this strategy has a high chance of failure which will be detrimental as after the short term assault as it leaves most of the weapons used up Example:used in the opening stages of the Korean War (USA and South Korea VS North Korea )
@shadowhunter-sh9zj3 ай бұрын
Also for those who are wandering I did not include China and the Soviet Union as they have not joined the war yet BTW I do not have a life 😂
@Jetlife334 ай бұрын
When he said bait and bleed, I automatically thought about wait and bleed by slipknot
@ngprentee4 ай бұрын
Saaame
@av812bb4 ай бұрын
0:23 if the leader dies the second in command steps in and can use the death of the leader for propaganda to make more civilians join up.
@eli_is_jelly29044 ай бұрын
These video are fire and hella enjoyable
@avivastudios23113 ай бұрын
Because the video was about war and conflict I was disinterested and I didn't click on it the first time I saw it. Man, I'm glad I changed my mind. This IS interesting.
@ibtastico3 ай бұрын
Thanks oversimplified for the background info on Fabian strategy (:
@BobfromSydney2 күн бұрын
This video is from four months ago. I think there is a clear reference to contemporary events in the section about Blockade strategies.
@ninonysoft68654 ай бұрын
While this is interesting, I do wish that you provided real world examples for more of the strategies. I know you did some for each, but would be nice for every strategy.
@KelvinWarren-eh9jp2 ай бұрын
The bait and bleed strategy can sometimes be callled winning by default in video games
@maxtonlopez93753 ай бұрын
Watching this before work, this’ll prove valuable at Chipotle.
@4T3hM4kr0n3 күн бұрын
Every vehicle armor type in 8 minutes or less. (Rolled Homogeneous armor, cast armor, cemented armor, composite armor, etc)
@GalifamackusАй бұрын
Great video! All that’s left is to fail art school.
@the-super-siblings2 ай бұрын
Hmm... very useful and instructive indeed... 😏
@SelfProclaimedGorl4 ай бұрын
Bait and bleed is literally what I do in doom
@SpeedKing..4 ай бұрын
It doesn't work in doom
@quadroninja27084 ай бұрын
@@SpeedKing..it does, at least in the first and the second installments. I believe it's called "monster infighting"
@SpeedKing..4 ай бұрын
@@quadroninja2708 oh I thought they were talking about doom eternal
@weeblordgaming60624 ай бұрын
Gonna get some wins in war zone with this
@jacobcampbell36373 ай бұрын
Can you do one about movement examples like flank, pinching, high ground that type of stuff. It matches and honestly cant find anything in one or more videos describing them all
@da_fishyman11064 күн бұрын
Whats the blockade called when you block far away access ports or channels? Like what Britain did to Germany in the First World War, blocking entrances in the North Sea and the English Channel
@jwil42862 ай бұрын
Bait and bleed: if the baiting side is REALLY smart, they’ll continue to BUILD UP strength, not just preserve what they have.
@akedus442 ай бұрын
Rome is my personal fave case of Salami Slicing
@kienngo46013 ай бұрын
Bro spent especially long time explaining about attrition war, clear and hold and blockage. Bro even brought how blockage can be war crime up. :> I wonder why. :>
@pained1explained13 ай бұрын
Great video!
@afrikasmith10499 күн бұрын
Bait and Bleed = The enemy of my enemy is my second prey.
@SlenderKS2 ай бұрын
Nice ! Freedom techniques !
@thepirateweasel4 ай бұрын
Every celestial body?
@Barbaryotaku11 күн бұрын
Clear and hold worked a treat in Afghanistan
@phineascampbell31033 ай бұрын
That Fabiius Maximus Varicosus preferred a strategy of taking your time over small steps isn't surprising...
@eclipticpeak84524 ай бұрын
@thepaintexplainer can we get a "every CQB Tactic Explained" video?
@pained2explained23 ай бұрын
Loved it!
@EdwardB-pl6mqАй бұрын
Shock and awe just sounds like blitzkrieg
@keyl25287 күн бұрын
if you think about everyone is at war right now using some of these strategies even without military action
@ZigzagEnd4 ай бұрын
arma and squad players assemble
@zelmonek4 ай бұрын
There is a saying in poland that translates to something like: where two fight, the third benefits. So this is the bait and bleed in my culture
@yvonnemoskera48174 ай бұрын
Excellent!
@BigyetiTechnologies4 ай бұрын
Shock and/or what?
@gnomewithaglobe23 күн бұрын
Gonna go hard for rainbow six siege
@mrordinarity2 ай бұрын
Winning a group chat country rp with this one
@ghazelthegreat32483 ай бұрын
By the way the roman General used it against handball and handball used the war will feed itself
@shadowhunter-sh9zj3 ай бұрын
Uphill strategy : forces will first secure a higher geographical position before attacking making the other force fight an uphill battle Advantages : the force will have an overlooking view of all target points supply routes buildings shipment ports etc Disadvantages : the forces are usually left very exposed to areal bombings Example : battle of Waterloo (French Empire VS English empire )
@amiralfrancais37002 ай бұрын
This is not a strategy, this is a battle tactic. It can only be applied in a small scale both in space and time, as you won't see the entire front of an army looking for the upper ground to fight nor will you see them do that the entire war (unless the war lasts only one battle). The only exception i know where the entire war was fought in uphill battles was the Italian-Austrian front during WW1, because the entire front was located in the Alps due to the Italian war-objective and the geographical borders of the two countries.
@Trigin-b1u2 ай бұрын
Shock n’ awe my specialty😂😂
@kamalissa81173 ай бұрын
Turkey really LOVES salami slicing
@staypuft244 ай бұрын
I was looking for the blitzkrieg strategy in the thumbnail, I’m assuming that falls under shock and awe
@thebaconman1624 ай бұрын
That was in the first part(AKA, his tactics video vs this being his strategies video)
@ArchaeopteryxGaming4 ай бұрын
Not realy. Blitzkrieg is manouver warfare. Shock and awe requires a numerical and or technical superiority. Germany never had that during WW2. They used mechanized forces to find weak spots in the enemy Defences and rapidly push through them to cut them off. Shock and awe is post war idea from the US, as He said in the video.
@addisonwelsh3 ай бұрын
Actually, that’s breakthrough tactics, and was back in his tactics video
@BloodKnight0034 ай бұрын
I think I tend to use that last method (maneuver warfare) most often when playing war strategy games (be it video games or tabletop) though I usually jokingly refer to it as “Flank ‘em and shank ‘em”
@NotTellingYoo4 ай бұрын
Do every zero-day vulnerability in 12 minutes
@glassghost87993 ай бұрын
What’s the difference between Fabian and attrition warfare? Or Battle of Annihilation and Shock and Awe?
@avivastudios23113 ай бұрын
This video shows one thing: People can be so cruel.
@asakayosapro4 ай бұрын
6:13 is pointless, all it takes is for one bot to fire a flare and- *[Bot Drop Detected]* Lessee, two factory striders, six tanks, more than a dozen hulks, and the rest is mostly shield and rocket devastators. And oh, there’s three gunship patrols coming, and they’re all alerted. Enjoy.
@addisonwelsh3 ай бұрын
Hence why Helldivers don’t hold ground.
@definerednek96992 ай бұрын
by your definition the SS were actually the first to implement shock and awe in the 1930's with blitzkrieg.
@sunrisejackdaw177923 күн бұрын
No? The idea of shock assaults is very very old.
@definerednek969923 күн бұрын
@@sunrisejackdaw1779 yes because the example he gave as one of the first was after the ss.
@Hardlett3 ай бұрын
Imma try these into tw games
@GavinRowe-p4v2 ай бұрын
what strat should i use for thumb war? i was thinking inkspot 😂
@JustinMansfield-w9dАй бұрын
Forgot about scorched earth.
@VirtualKota4 ай бұрын
You missed an S in the Inkspot introduction
@deltha_the_1st4 ай бұрын
You should be way more reconized by your work than other copycats that have appeard all over youtube, Your work is always understandable and quick as a professional you are
@Pete675u4 ай бұрын
Blitz kreig
@iAnonymous8774 ай бұрын
I think that was in part 1
@alexblu92234 ай бұрын
I think it's a tactic, not a strategy
@wapandaforever2424 ай бұрын
@@alexblu9223What's the difference?
@EndlessNine99994 ай бұрын
@@wapandaforever242Tactic wins the Battle, Strategy wins the war
@wapandaforever2423 ай бұрын
@@EndlessNine9999 kk thx
@demonprancer6453 ай бұрын
Me who’s used half of these strategies in hearts of iron 4:
@Lechuga18154 ай бұрын
Defeat in Detail, aka, Divide and Conquer?
@addisonwelsh3 ай бұрын
That was in the tactics video
@IAmThanSolo3 ай бұрын
How many of these did Palpatine use throughout his lifetime(s)?
@wistual4 ай бұрын
third partying in apex 0:00
@JGerrity3 ай бұрын
So… everybody hates on yellow, but yellow never even sees conflict?
@soloshottie3 ай бұрын
isnt attrition warfare a strategy of numbers? basically playing an eye for an eye kind of game, which would be used by a side that has a significant numbers advantage, and chooses attrition to end the war quickly and decisively so that the opposing force has minimal time to change plans what you described for attrition here sounds much more like hit and run tactics, used in the revolutionary war since the Americans had significantly less forces and resources than the English. which speaking of, the words and hit and run are never used in this video, but it's one of the most well known strategies culturally, especially since it effectively represents underdog stories
@valentinov9012 ай бұрын
yeah,but the numbers are usually replacement speed instead of sheer number of units if you can replace loses quicker than the enemy,you can outlast them,even if they initially begin with more numbers than you for example russia vs ukraine russia had around 12k tanks in storage,ukraine around 4k russia is losing tanks faster than ukraine,at some point of 2025/2026 ukraine will have more tanks than russia unless russia manages to massively increase its production a smaller opponent can use attrition to wear down and soften specific capabilities of the enemy (tank,air defense,supplies etc) in preparation for the quick phase of the conflict
@grantsmith17443 ай бұрын
Bait and bleed is just 3rd partying😂😂
@rickms36714 ай бұрын
Every important science theory explained
@Mururm4 ай бұрын
Cutting the pie
@pyeitme5084 ай бұрын
Yes
@Wavy_Gravy2 ай бұрын
Sun Tsu was a larper.
@basvanheumen42313 ай бұрын
Attrition warfare might go hand-in-hand with guerilla/skirmish tactics. If resources are costly and the enemy has an overwhelming amount of troops/resources to spend, you may want to invest in small, independent groups or organisations that can attack the enemy while you rebuild your resources in the meantime. Sometimes, these independent groups attack both sides during the conflict, profiting of the unfolded chaos. For example during a civil war, a crusade or independence war. Blockades can be done both on land and sea, even sometimes in the air. Examples of them: A land blockade could be the European borders. Passing through an neutral or NATO allied land can work as a blockade, you may want to go around that area. A sea blockade is exactly as shown in the video, sometimes there's a fleet nearby the blockade, usually an aircraft carrier or a few battleships. The big ships are mobile headquarters, housing more support on the insides, especially the aircraft carrier as it can send out planes to patrol and fight where the blockade can't go. An air blockade can't stay in one place, but overwhelming AA guns or the presence alone can stop an airforce from coming to you. (Example of an air blockade could be the battle of Britain, where the Luftwaffe couldn't safely reach England, without getting hit by AA guns or enemy patrols. Another example could be the American presence in the Pacific during 1944, where Japan could not reach the islands safely with this much American ships and fighter planes.)
@mihong11873 ай бұрын
5:17 isreal moment
@abracadabra162343 ай бұрын
When 57 Islamic countries are against you and you still come out on top 😂😂
@delano45263 ай бұрын
It’s not a war crime if Palestine does it, right?
@DeadManWalking012 ай бұрын
@abracadabra16234 when you can't count and don't know anything about politics
@IlayShrikiАй бұрын
Don’t attack us
@反ヨーロッパのサムライ5 күн бұрын
@@abracadabra16234 bogus western propaganda you only fought 7 lol.