There Are NO 'SCIENTIFIC MIRACLES' in the Quran

[@Some.guy.animating]

How dare KZbin hide this from me for 4 minutes

[@Zedrecon]

20 😡😡😡

[@LUCAS_7_7_7]

@@Zedreconsame >:(

[@salvadorisaiperezlopez1431]

@@Zedrecon well, for me it was 23

[@Zedrecon]

@@salvadorisaiperezlopez1431 Your late...

[@arvinnick647]

It must be Quran miracle

[@dhplaz1475]

Even if there was "scientific miracles", it doesen't change the fact that it could be inspired by satan, a fallen angel with greater knowledge than us humans.

[@michaelg4919]

he did have more knowledge? he didn't even know that Christ would rise again

[@itzNaddy]

@@michaelg4919 Of course Satan knows he even knows how he will die but his goal isn't to be worshipped but to drag down others with him

[@truthbebold4009]

Precisely! The same applies to the book of Mormon. LDS: "how could Joseph have known _______?" 😃 Me: 🥱

[@truthbebold4009]

​@@michaelg4919even if Satan didn't know that (debatable - I think) doesn't mean much in the way of him knowing way more than any human about science and such. Do we know for sure that he didn't know Jesus would rise again? I've heard Heiser speculate on that but just wondering if it can be proven. Peace

[@bruhice6058]

@@michaelg4919is that biblical?

[@Burlapyui]

"The quaran claims its revelations whilst in reality it took other preexisting information, got it wrong, and never gave credit" Well that explains the whole history of the Turks

[@KalebOfAxum12]

Based Greek

[@kze24]

Based Aristotle debunking a claim from a religion that didn't even exist yet

[@AbdirahmanAli-wz8lc]

This is false the claim that prophet Mohammed did not know how to read or write is supported by both Muslim and non Muslim historical sources. Muslims keep loving Jesus and some Christian’s keep disrespecting our traditions in return

[@kemalerdemsahin410]

Komşu, deme öyle komşu....

[@ruin1619]

And you Greeks lost so much land and cities to them…

[@darkwolf7740]

The only miracle is the friends we make along the way 🥰

[@briandiehl9257]

@@dirkjensen969 are you sure?

[@darkwolf7740]

​@@dirkjensen969I'm not surprised

[@kze24]

​@@darkwolf7740This comment made me laugh out loud

[@TopatTom]

@@dirkjensen969im honered to be the first.

[@capt_uncoolguy3285]

God bless you and everyone you know Jesus forgives just repent and have faith in him and you shall be forgiven Amen Alleluia✝️🙏🙌

[@timothytakang5407]

Muslim Apologist, Ali Dawah; "The scientific miracles of the Qur'an have been debunked".

[@pseudonym1515]

At least they still have the argument from intolerance

[@AliAbbas-eb9cb]

@@pseudonym1515 nahhh no one said that

[@stephengray1344]

@@AliAbbas-eb9cb The argument from intolerance is the one Andrew Tate gave for his conversion to Islam. So yes somebody did say that.

[@Topher3088]

He recently used the water getting darker argument as you go deeper. “How could Muhammad have known that?” Lmao 😂🤦

[@AliAbbas-eb9cb]

@@onyil0688 i want you to go search. "23 criticisms of the quran debunked." This is a youtube video, it has the answer to this and much more. pleas spare me the typing of something a 16 yo revert can explain.

[@Chinmookchin]

muhammad splitting the moon is the most hilarious for me

[@darkwolf7740]

Funniest thing is... the account doesn't even say that Muhammed did it. Muslims just assume he did because he's mentioned within the account.

[@jay-d8g3v]

For real 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@CarLivesMatter]

@@darkwolf7740some Muslims I debated had said that allah split the moon to prove muhammed is a prophet

[@EHed-kv2wb]

​​@@darkwolf7740hes not even mentioned in the ayah, it just says the hour has come and the moon has split in 2. Nothing indicates it was muhammad doing the splitting. Its only in the Hadith which come over 250 years after the quran.

[@KonUzer]

​@@EHed-kv2wb So they have been adding to the doctrine when mohamet wasnt even mentioned?

[@stevej71393]

Muslims trying to argue that 7th century Arabs didn't know you need water to live 🤣

[@xander688]

Yes, and there were people who knew that people were literally created from him.

[@WhoIsLikeHim]

Islamic dawah strategy: Confidence comes first, truth comes later.

[@salehal4291]

speakk to me and we would see.

[@aqibhussaiin]

@@salehal4291 leave them in their happy place🤣they cant debate on live television thats why they make these videos that are so out of context

[@christianriddler5063]

@@aqibhussaiin Apostate prophet and David Wood has debated muslims in the open multiple times and demolished the dawah folks every single time.

[@aqibhussaiin]

@christianriddler5063 havent seen it once 😂, your only weapon is taking things out of context

[@salehal4291]

@@christianriddler5063 give me the sources.

[@giorgaras1851]

Comparing ancient greeks with momo is like comparing rocket scientists with a caveman (even saying momo is like a caveman it would be an insult for the caveman)

[@EHed-kv2wb]

Academic scholars say he was not even illiterate, even though muslims love claiming the quran is a linguistic miracle.

[@fggarcia6010]

😅😂 Thank you for reminding me how amazing ancient greece was.. Even though they were pagan that time.. Loved the art & architecture..

[@KimberlyRuth-y8b]

Well, he did meditate in the Hira cave when Angel Gabriei came to him with revelation, I wonder if he was hallucinating, wonder if he became hungry and took some mushrooms or ate whatever was growing in that cave, felt weird and saw some visions cause shrooms cause hallucinations and came running down to his suger momma Khadija saying "cover me cover me" cause i feel cold.

[@HeLpLOstGOdAny1]

​@@KimberlyRuth-y8b Meeting Jabreel with 600 pairs of wings, a messenger for a 3 eyed god on throne held in space by goats is an overdose of something . ..

[@ItsNeoss]

@@KimberlyRuth-y8b you use such language for other religion and call ppl to your religion truly shame we muslim don't disrespect Jesus like you do him and other prophets.

[@Bolling0]

5:18 ''Not a race to who *comes* first'' 💀

[@Lawsolos]

which is bull how about you read the verses?

[@Bolling0]

@@Lawsolos What?

[@ericdanielski4802]

Nice information.

[@ericdanielski4802]

@@aidenhill960 Thank you very much.

[@Fawzy_dawah]

If it’s nice info then what did he even prove?

[@Mrchosen-c4g]

As a Muslim scholar, I must respectfully disagree with many of the claims and interpretations presented in this critique of Quranic scientific miracles. While I appreciate the effort to critically examine religious texts, I believe this analysis misrepresents Islamic teachings and oversimplifies complex theological and scientific issues. Let me address some of the key points: Embryology in the Quran: The Quranic description of embryonic development should be understood in its historical and linguistic context. While it's true that Greek philosophers like Aristotle and Galen made significant contributions to embryology, the Quranic account offers unique insights: The term "alaqah" used in the Quran (23:14) has multiple meanings, including "leech-like", "suspended thing", and "blood clot". Modern embryology has shown that the early embryo does indeed resemble a leech in shape and its attachment to the uterine wall. The Quran's description of the "mudghah" stage as "chewed-like" accurately reflects the somite pairs that form in the embryo, giving it an appearance similar to teeth marks in chewed substance. While it's true that bone and muscle formation overlap, the Quranic description of bones being clothed with flesh (23:14) can be understood as a simplified explanation of a complex process, focusing on the visible appearance of the embryo's development. The Big Bang in the Quran: The interpretation of Surah 21:30 as referring to the Big Bang is not universally accepted among Islamic scholars. However, the verse does present a concept of the universe's origins that aligns with modern cosmological theories: The idea of the heavens and earth being "joined together" before being "separated" does bear some resemblance to the concept of the universe expanding from a singularity. While this verse alone doesn't prove divine origin, it presents a cosmological view that was not common in 7th century Arabia. Water and Life: The Quranic emphasis on water as essential for life (21:30) goes beyond simply observing that living things need water. It presents water as the origin of all living things, which aligns with modern scientific understanding of life's origins in aqueous environments. Iron from the Heavens: The Quranic verse about iron being "sent down" (57:25) can be interpreted metaphorically or literally. If taken literally, it aligns with the scientific fact that iron on Earth originated from supernovae. While ancient cultures may have associated iron with the heavens, the Quranic verse presents this in the context of a broader discussion about the purpose and uses of iron, suggesting a more comprehensive understanding. Mountains as Pegs: The Quranic description of mountains as pegs (78:6-7) is more nuanced than simply stating mountains have roots. It suggests a stabilizing function, which, while not exactly matching modern plate tectonic theory, does reflect an understanding of the Earth's crust that was not common knowledge in 7th century Arabia. Stars as Missiles: The verses describing stars as missiles (67:5) should be understood in their context. Many scholars interpret this as referring to meteors or shooting stars, not actual stars. This interpretation doesn't contradict modern astronomical knowledge. Human Reproduction: The Quranic verse about the origin of reproductive fluids (86:5-7) uses the term "between the backbone and the ribs", which some scholars interpret as referring to the entire trunk of the body, including the reproductive organs. This interpretation aligns with the fact that embryonic gonads develop in the dorsal wall of the abdomen. Hadith on Child Resemblance: The hadith about child resemblance based on which parent's discharge comes first is not considered a scientific explanation but rather a simplified way of addressing the question of heredity in terms that 7th century Arabs could understand. Sex Determination: The hadith about an angel determining the sex of a baby should be understood in a spiritual context, not as a scientific explanation. It doesn't contradict the biological process of sex determination but speaks to the belief in divine involvement in human creation. Hygiene and Medical Advice: The hadiths about flies and camel urine should be understood in their historical and cultural context. Modern research has shown that some fly species do carry antimicrobial substances, and camel urine has been found to have some medicinal properties. However, these hadiths are not considered universal medical prescriptions in Islamic thought. Adam's Height: The hadith about Adam's height is considered by many scholars to be allegorical, not literal. It may be understood as emphasizing human potential and spiritual stature rather than physical size.

[@StardustSummoner]

@@Mrchosen-c4g I AM NOT READING ALLAT

[@lancetamama3674]

religious yapping

[@Mrchosen-c4g]

@@StardustSummoner ok Ig

[@AndersonJohnson-yc2tm]

evidence: nuh uh

[@Mrchosen-c4g]

@@AndersonJohnson-yc2tm May I ask what evidence is needed.

[@Wherearethenukes45]

I could theologically defend harry potter better than i could defend islam

[@LutzWeissmuller]

Not surprise, a pedophile, the contradictions on how to treat christians, the inaccurate stories, the inaccurate quotes, Ezra being worshipped as Messiah never happened, and the most ridicolous one, the Zu Al-Qarnayn part wich proves Quran is false no matter where you see it

[@Unitedsteaks.]

You don't need to say this bro I ain't fond of the Quran but there is no need for disrespect

[@Lawsolos]

i can defend islam better then defend a embarresment of a reiligon chrisshitstain

[@SuitedReady]

Its no disrespect litterly facts​@Unitedsteaks.

[@Unitedsteaks.]

@@SuitedReady ngl wellll it does

[@jimnicholas7334]

I showed this to a sceptic friend of mine, and he said watching it was like that line from Lord of the Rings: *both of us looking at the Quaran* "Never thought I'd be fighting side by side with a Christian" "How about fighting side by side with a friend?" "Aye I could do that"

[@AliAbbas-eb9cb]

Nahh your friend lowkey a hypocrite.

[@jimnicholas7334]

@@AliAbbas-eb9cb Yeah but calling 'em out on it doesn't make them change. I know 1st hand :/

[@AbdirahmanAli-wz8lc]

You trying to take a non thiest as an ally to “fight side by side with” to defeat fellow thiests shows how low some new age Christian’s will go

[@AliAbbas-eb9cb]

@@jimnicholas7334 ya i do

[@voltekthecyborg7898]

@@AbdirahmanAli-wz8lc Muslims are not fellow theists

[@Bigbrother-r2o]

Wow, I was almost convinced by a Muslim friend about the miracles of the Quran. KZbin saved the day 😂😂

[@guille6785]

It genuinely depresses me to see how many gen z's are converting to islam based on this garbage argument

[@yyxzyy]

What’s garbage?

[@Loveistheirwholehapp]

They're converting because it's trendy. They want something to fight (Islamaphobia), so they convert thinking it's a hip, foreign, non-white version of Christianity

[@ohwni]

@@yyxzyy Did you watch the video?

[@yyxzyy]

@@ohwni Yes and his arguments are not strong, takes hadiths as his source which is not reliable at all, uses translations of the quran and doesn’t give all of the context, or interpret badly the verses Did i answer your question?

[@guille6785]

@@yyxzyy zingus

[@GUTS-ff3]

Muslim: *shows a miracle* *gets debunked* Muslim: *it was a metaphor 😭😭!*

[@MISSPEDDLETHESEAGAY]

RELIGOUS PEOPLE ARE THE CRINGE PEOPLE!

[@AlexZender-uf6et]

Debate me

[@AlexZender-uf6et]

Debate me on whats wrong in islam

[@AlexZender-uf6et]

@@jamilah278 i did theres even channel debunking all his vids

[@AlexZender-uf6et]

@@jamilah278 i def did theres even channel debunking all there vids

[@NekoSam395]

don't forget the infamous 'different ocean water ain't mix up' while all of the footages shown were actually between ocean and river

[@TestifyApologetics]

Almost included that

[@nevergoingtogiveyouup161]

And the sun set in the muddy water😂😂

[@Clash-Always]

What are you talking about, The quran literally says that different oceans mix in surah-Alrahman

[@NekoSam395]

@@Clash-Always you sure love inconsistencies, don't you?

[@Katō-sao]

Are you familiar with the argument that Muhammad came up with the idea that female spiders only make webs? I have a friend of mine who brings this up constantly and says no one knew this knowledge before the Quran. ​@@TestifyApologetics

[@adhot_garang]

W ✝️

[@kotimara8711]

All religions are unscientific. Guy turning water into wine, walking on water are also pure unscientific bullshit

[@sufyaneducator]

Don't be happy you think Earth is 6000 Year's old dummy.

[@Robust311]

@@adhot_garang fr

[@observerre]

@@adhot_garang Please, as a Christian, I say let's respect other people's religious beliefs.

[@Eh-Mungu-Nguvu-Yetu-q8p]

0:58 it isn't even accurate for the seventh century let alone modern science

[@MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun]

Bees has 16 chromosomes and Chapter the Bee is Chapter 16 ! This is just one, and there are SO MANY MORE pattens of 16 and even 32 too ( Male BEE = 16 chromosome, Female BEE = 32 chromosomes ) just regarding this topic of BEES and Chapter 16, The Bee alone !

[@kinbruh]

@MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun how do you explain the things in the video, tho like the sex determination

[@MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun]

@@kinbruh I am more into chromosome counts of organism only. Sex determination I don't really understand much. Sorry

[@kinbruh]

@@MeemHaMeemDhal--khaYaRaWawNun i understand it and i can tell you quran is wrong

[@ozzymandias7346]

Great video. From the imagery and your rational arguments I'm deducing you are a REAL Apostolic Christian. Keep up the good work here; the word is indeed getting out in the mohammedan world.

[@andro6534]

4:41 Muhammad really prooved that pee is stored in balls.

[@LightningBiue]

@@andro6534 what that just logic

[@theliopleurodon]

@@andro6534 ... no?

[@gogeta7664]

😂😂😂😂

[@Nexusbeyond]

@@andro6534 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ObsidianTortoise-x6y]

ngl stars being used as missiles to hit Satan is pretty metal

[@Onlyafool172]

Its very cool I admit, but they dont believe the devil is a angel

[@MOEKIO]

They should make an album out of it but instead of demons being hit it's Allah himself

[@Christusvinci]

​@@Onlyafool172well the "angel" that visited momo, didn't want give his identity away. Hence the jinn decoy😂😂😂

[@Onlyafool172]

@Christusvinci lol

[@kareempadsha2007]

Before I watched this video is was Muslim….albamdulliah I’m still Muslim after this video 😭😭😭

[@TestifyApologetics]

thanks for binge watching

[@mathewpt4478]

Back in the 90s and early 2000s if any of you all know They used to say Niel Armstrong Hear their prayer in the Moon while There is no sound in space 🤣

[@Sky-xd2nu]

It was a metaphorical sound.😂😂

[@kze24]

​@@Sky-xd2nuJust like how Muslim apologists have metaphorical girlfriends. Or they got a literal one by force, as the case may be.

[@ebonymaw8457]

Neil himself came out and said that was a lie 😂

[@killgoretrout877]

@@Sky-xd2nu found the muslim moon worshiper

[@abdouboukerroucha169]

اTell him that Muhammad lived in an era in which foreign books were not yet translated

[@Christusvinci]

Who said 😂😂😂😂? While traders were all over the place peddling this "scientific" during that time, its pretty easy to pick on it. that's why they called him "the ear"😂

[@MrBromedy]

This was a great watch! Thank you as always

[@nilsondorigo9658]

you forgot Lily's dawah tagline,"and we are proud of that"

[@drumpogrom]

The verse about child resemblance is actually stolen from the Talmud

[@maxmccarrick5671]

Proof and Talmudic verse? otherwise, appeal to assumption and Hitchens razor

[@pizzaninja5145]

@@maxmccarrick5671 R. Isaac citing R. Ammi stated: If the woman emits her semen first she bears a male child; if the man emits his semen first she bears a female child; Babylonian Talmud, Nidda 31a

[@TestifyApologetics]

Double oof

[@drumpogrom]

@@maxmccarrick5671 🥴

[@maxmccarrick5671]

@@drumpogrom No need for that, i was simply curious for proof.

[@Kingdragonkhs]

Womp womp to the Quran W to Bible the words of God

[@Choppar9853]

You broke rule 1 there

[@AlexZender-uf6et]

False

[@dback50]

Also when he "splits the moon", you'd think someone else would see it right? I mean, for Jesus's death, when darkness fell, scientists in Asia reported an eclipse happening right then. One would think that at least someone would have noticed if the WHOLE MOON split in half.

[@polokucoch8112]

The ENTIRE WORLD DIDN'T SEE THE MOON SPLIT IN HALF WHEN MILLIONS OF PEOPLE WOULD HAVE BEEN STARING AT THE SKY AT ANY GIVEN TIME. islam is comical and it doesn't explicitly say that allah's partner mahamed split the moon in half i believe...

[@dback50]

@@polokucoch8112 I’ve never heard a solid rebuttal 😂

[@polokucoch8112]

@@dback50 Neither have I EVER heard a solid rebuttal from the muslims. It SERIOUSLY is COMICAL.

[@anisaka6860]

I am from a Muslim country, we study these types of stuff, and most of us students hate it since we are all forced into learning them, but the thing they told us abt Mohammed splitting the moon was to prove the people which were against Allah that he actually existed and Mohammed was his profit, of course there's also some of our religious teachers saying that the reason some parts of Quran is messed up is because (if I'm correct) Mohammed heard the words of allah from an angel, and told them to a person which could write, and that could've changed some parts of it, but again, I'm not defending Islam for some of the weird stuff it has

[@polokucoch8112]

@@anisaka6860 Yeah. Very WEIRD religion. It's so easy to see that islam, and mahamed and his partner are all 100% FALSE. Thanks for sharing that!

[@Apav]

Love how he's using different synonyms to change things up from "here's the kicker"

[@GovernmentOfRomania]

It baffles me how muslims still havent realised Muhammad is a false prophet 💀🙏

[@Utahime222]

Dont you read quran?

[@Utahime222]

Look iam onther religion iam from norway look your not cool imagine someone making fun of your religion you will be pissed same as me just respect them there all same spiecies like us

[@Light56372]

​@@Utahime222 remember my friend Truth hurts more when you reject it The Bible is always TRUE Jesus is the only way

[@Utahime222]

@@Light56372 ok but about islam you cant force them even says quran dont force non islam to islam

[@andrewthefatwatso5639]

You leave Islam, you get ki||ed that’s why 2 billions are scared to leave.

[@cr-mv7fi]

"It is one of the miracles of the Qur'an,!!! The words of the Qur'an and their count in the Qur'an: Dunya (World): 115 | Akhirah (Hereafter): 115 Angels: 88 | Devils (Shayatin): 88 Muhammad: 4 | Shari'ah (Law): 4 People (An-Nas): 50 | Prophets (Anbiya): 50 Righteousness (Salah): 50 | Corruption (Fasad): 50 Iblis (Satan): 11 | Seeking refuge from him: 11 Man (Rajul): 24 | Woman (Imra'ah): 24 Life (Hayat): 145 | Death (Mawt): 145 Righteous deeds (Salihat): 167 | Bad deeds (Sayyi'at): 167 Public (Jahr): 16 | Outward (Al-'Alaniyyah): 16 Trial (Musibah): 75 | Gratitude (Shukr): 75 Guidance (Huda): 79 | Mercy (Rahmah): 79 Notice the words and their opposites. These statistics indicate that this Qur'an is from Allah and that humans cannot produce anything like it. Some words have been repeated a number of times for a divine wisdom: Reward (Jazaa): 117 | Forgiveness (Maghfirah): 234 Meaning double. Why? Because Allah's mercy and forgiveness encompass all things. Difficulty (Usr): 12 | Ease (Yusr): 36 Meaning 3 times. Why? Because two eases will never be overcome by one difficulty. Some important observations from the statistics: The word (Salah) (prayer) is mentioned 5 times, and the prayers are 5 times a day. The word (Yawm) (day) is mentioned 365 times, and there are 365 days in a year. Among the divine miracles in the Qur'an: The word (Ard) (earth) is mentioned 13 times, and (Bahr) (sea) is mentioned 32 times. If we try to find the percentage of repetition for both words, we find that the word (Bahr) occurs 71% of the time, while the word (Ard) occurs 29%, which corresponds to the actual ratio of seas to land on our planet's surface.

[@JoeMCool]

You obviously didn't check your numbers - you're just copy/pasting dawahganda BS that you've never bothered to even verify. Your math ain't mathin. Check your numbers again, bruh.

[@ينوس1]

​@@JoeMCoolare you angry?? You don't want to accept the truth?

[@ينوس1]

It's not worth debating Christians they will refuse to believe,they are blind . 6:33 "We certainly know that what they say grieves you, but it is not you they reject-it is the signs of Allah that the wrongdoers deny."

[@JoeMCool]

@@ينوس1 Nope. Not a bit angry... Just shocked and astounded by the sheer willful stupidity of some Muslims. 😆 You quoted a verse illustrating how nobody believed your pdf-file prophet because of all the errors and contradictions he kept bringing. 😄😄😄 Wanna talk next about how he and AlLlah thought that women have sperm? 🤓 86:6 خُلِقَ مِن مَّآءٍۢ دَافِقٍۢ ٦ ˹They were˺ created from a spurting fluid, - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran He was created from a fluid, ejected, - Saheeh International He is created of spouting water - T. Usmani He is created from spurting fluid, - M.A.S. Abdel Haleem He is created from a gushing fluid - M. Pickthall He is created from a drop emitted- - A. Yusuf Ali He is created from a water gushing forth, - Al-Hilali & Khan 86:7 يَخْرُجُ مِنۢ بَيْنِ ٱلصُّلْبِ وَٱلتَّرَآئِبِ ٧ stemming from between the backbone and the ribcage.[1] - Dr. Mustafa Khattab, The Clear Quran [1] Testes and ovaries are formed in the abdomen of the fetus during the first weeks of pregnancy, before descending to their permanent place in the pelvis. Both are sustained by arteries originating between the backbone and the ribcage. Emerging from between the backbone and the ribs. - Saheeh International that comes out from between the loins and the chest-bones. - T. Usmani then he emerges from between the backbone and breastbone: - M.A.S. Abdel Haleem That issued from between the loins and ribs. - M. Pickthall Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs: - A. Yusuf Ali Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs. - Al-Hilali & Khan *Tafsir Ibn Kathir:* Allah says, فَلْيَنظُرِ الإِنسَـنُ مِمَّ خُلِقَ (So, let man see from what he is created!) This is alerting man to the weakness of his origin from which he was created. The intent of it is to guide man to accept (the reality of) the Hereafter, because whoever is able to begin the creation then he is also able to repeat it in the same way. This is as Allah says, وَهُوَ الَّذِى يَبْدَأُ الْخَلْقَ ثُمَّ يُعِيدُهُ وَهُوَ أَهْوَنُ عَلَيْهِ (And He it is Who originates the creation, then He will repeat it; and this is easier for Him.) (30:27) Then Allah says, خُلِقَ مِن مَّآءٍ دَافِقٍ (He is created from a water gushing forth.) meaning, the sexual fluid that comes out bursting forth from the man and the woman. Thus, the child is produced from both of them by the permission of Allah. Due to this Allah says, يَخْرُجُ مِن بَيْنِ الصُّلْبِ وَالتَّرَآئِبِ (Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.) meaning, the backbone (or loins) of the man and the ribs of the woman, which is referring to her chest. Shabib bin Bishr reported from `Ikrimah who narrated from Ibn `Abbas that he said, يَخْرُجُ مِن بَيْنِ الصُّلْبِ وَالتَّرَآئِبِ (Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs.) "The backbone of the man and the ribs of the woman. It (the fluid) is yellow and fine in texture. The child will not be born except from both of them (i.e., their sexual fluids)."

[@JoeMCool]

@@ينوس1 Are these the signs of AlLlah that you meant? 🤓

[@jeremysepicrun]

You've done plenty on atheist, Mormonism and Islam. How about Judaism, Hinduism and buddhism? It's really interesting learning about other faiths and how to proselytise to them

[@LucienMahikai]

Honestly? Buddhism is probably the faith you don't need to criticize. They worship no false gods(Buddha never said to worship him, and while Bodhisatva Guanyin is sometimes said to be a Goddess, that's not canon), and they're generally good.

[@Lord-521]

Buddhism is more of a philosophy then a religion

[@JustDanka]

Yeah Buddhism is good

[@rip_goat958]

1:33 you quoted the verse wrong. It actually says, "and we brought forth from water every living thing". This statement adequately aligns with modern day understanding of abiogenesis

[@micheledicecioc]

Yo this Is an unrealesed video, first! It was

[@jcmtjmtbgb]

@@micheledicecioc lol

[@micheledicecioc]

Yoo you found it too​@@jcmtjmtbgb

[@Catholic_Crusader14]

Christ is king ✝️

[@RegularPeashooter]

Not the god

[@MateusPicolli]

@@RegularPeashooter Christ is God!

[@RegularPeashooter]

@@MateusPicolli who's his father again?

[@MateusPicolli]

@@RegularPeashooter God, the Father.

[@RegularPeashooter]

@@MateusPicolli a God, who has Son? And gender? What god is this? Jesus never claim he is God. But instead pray to his god, Allah SWT

[@TheTrueCaesar]

From Alexander To Embryology Average Aristotle Win

[@pizzaninja5145]

*Deenresponds filling with rage making angry response video*

[@darkwolf7740]

*Furiously keyboard spamming*

[@pizzaninja5145]

⁠@@darkwolf7740​​⁠ *turning into a angry tomato* 🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫🟫 ⬛️⬛️🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛️⬛️ 🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟧⬛️🟥🟥🟥⬛️🟧🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛️⬛️⬛️🟥🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥🟥 🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥⬛️🟥🟥

[@TestifyApologetics]

Didn't watch does he really think Song of Solomon is talking about Mo?

[@HumanityInCrisis]

@@TestifyApologetics OMG 😂😂😂 you have to consent to be civil before you can comment. Yet here you are mocking billions of people 😄😄😄 its always the W rage hahaha with the double standards. Anyway.. its funny how ya'll make these rage bait stuff for views. Lol 😆🤣😂 well ppl need to eat! Thanks for the laughs !!

[@Dagestanidude]

​@@TestifyApologetics bro you have to make response video. His smug tone of voice pisses me off

[@Peter-wy9kj]

nah, that "whoever came first" is just wild

[@fildafernandes4366]

Testify there is a Muslim apologetic channel called deensrespond and has made lots of videos on you

[@darkwolf7740]

Man's obsessed with Erik

[@PoppinPsinceAD33]

He’s goofy, bros child mirage videos make hmm sus

[@TestifyApologetics]

Free rent

[@avivastudios2311]

​@@TestifyApologetics You mean "free advertising". 😅

[@racksityentertainment]

1:51 One Piece is real Confirmed 🤯 🏴‍☠️

[@unleastzgaming9282]

@@racksityentertainment one peace is real!

[@unleastzgaming9282]

One peace is real!

[@superhealing5511]

@@racksityentertainment let's go find it out,

[@EnHacore1]

Mohamed fails every single time

[@Er1HM]

Muhammad most likely didnt even exist

[@RaifX39]

Wow.. What a claim, many history books talk about his existence apart from the Quran

[@Er1HM]

@@RaifX39 yes, but they come 150 years after his death. All other existence „claims“ refute todays islam

[@VAYLINN3309]

@@EnHacore1 Quran: astronomy geology numerical miracles Bible: Jesus love you Jesus love you Jesus love you Jesus love you Jesus love you

[@Bougainvillea_42]

⁠@@VAYLINN3309inaccurate where is the updates

[@jfr45er]

Muslims will conclude that Aristotle must have been a Muslim. In fact it’s a transliteration of Aristabdool. You seeee!

[@Heyurgirlistotallyrandom]

Islam wasn't even there in ancient greece, it was all paganism

[@NewVibesLyrics]

Astaghfirullah brother

[@joonalehtinen8041]

Lets pray that many muslims will see this! 🙏

[@gargamel3478]

Is every muslim a medical doctor?

[@Semipro436]

Jesus Christ is King

[@TrendingPolitics-fe1ko]

quran in , logic out

[@polokucoch8112]

Let's not forget that the quan copies virtually stories upon stories upon verses upon verses upon concepts upon concepts and there's not supposed to be any book like the quran? It's the most COMICAL THING I have EVER SEEN!!

[@phibik]

the sounds effects are crazy and I love it

[@ITRNHWithoutThisGlazer]

29 views in 1 min bro fell up he’s winning 🏆🏆🏆

[@mkzhero]

"Mom, ehy do i look like you?" "Well you see, dad really knew what he was doing.." 😂

[@chadparalosamigos1887]

Alhamdulillah ☝️👳🍺🐪

[@signal1111-g4w]

Halelujah🍻🍺... lgbt parade in America: "Jesus is 🏳️‍🌈" where christian?? majority in USA....?? ✝️✝️

[@ronmohomar]

if Muhammad was a scientist, the largest library would be in his house

[@fotisk-sg2sh]

Testify, since this video will bring anti theists and muslims saying: "Well, the bible has scientific errors too!" I suggest you do a video on those as well, and explaining them.

[@lowballinn]

The Bible doesnt really make scientific claims.

[@EHed-kv2wb]

Thing is apart from some evangelical fundamentalists, Christians generally don't claim the Bible has scientific miracles like muslims do. Muslims do but even top academics admit it has none.

[@Therandomdisciple]

@@lowballinnit says we have innumerable stars

[@lowballinn]

@@Therandomdisciple verse?

[@TomKarp.slomsk]

​@@HERRAMAĐR Death is irreversible, so according to science, Jesus is dead. Heaven, hell, and God cannot be proven true through empirical evidence. Snakes can't talk, and enchantments defy the laws of physics. I could spend an entire day discussing the unscientific aspects mentioned in the Bible...

[@tahakamran649]

May Allah guide you.

[@finnishrealkk124]

May Allah stay away from me.

[@jeterank9847]

Jokes on you Allah doesn't exist. Oh wait he does exist he's the devil 😂😂😂

[@Alperen236]

@@finnishrealkk124 Allah is everywhere.

[@finnishrealkk124]

@@Alperen236 Oh no, I’m doing oooo mashallsh eeeee *prayer* (may prison be upon Mohammed)

[@suraj1311]

Nicely explained.

[@Moneynis]

lol these thumbnails and edits make my day!

[@HammerSpam]

The bible actually does have scientific miracles. In Revelations 21:15-21 12 gemstones are used to build the new Jerusalem. “The first was jasper, the second sapphire, the third agate, the fourth emerald, 20 the fifth onyx, the sixth carnelian, the seventh chrysolite, the eighth beryl, the ninth topaz, the tenth chrysoprase, the eleventh jacinth, the twelfth amethyst.” The property that these gems share is that their crystal structure is anisotropic. When you observe anisotropic crystals with a microscope using cross polarised light the show all the colours of the rainbow, whereas isotopic crystals like diamond or ruby behave like a polarising filter meaning at certain angles, cross polarised light would make them appear black. Nobody knew about this phenomenon until centuries later and John the apostle sure as heck didn’t know about it either

[@rightousnesspursuer6523]

​@christianfreedom-seeker934 So? All 12 gems are anisotropic. Whether it's symbolic or not doesn't hide the weird coincidence that all the gems mentioned are anisotropic.

[@puyaaaa]

This channel did a hit on islam, with second it exploded, guy found his rent paying hack.

[@getonmyabdi3332]

Alhamdulillah I'm a Muslim

[@betherpflumberm]

Alhamdulillah, you gladly did not succumb to suck poor arguments.

[@ninjatall15]

@@betherpflumberm what was the poor argument in the video.

[@betherpflumberm]

​@@ninjatall15 False Embryology Argument: He claims the Quran states flesh were developed before bones, however his argument is false, (23:14). The Quran does not deny the simultaneous development of the skeletal structure, but states how bone development precedes, the secondary flesh embodiment (encapsulation of flesh around the bone).

[@betherpflumberm]

@@ninjatall15 Claims of obscure scientific evidence of fetal development, significance of water, etc., yet fails to recognize the lack of availability of such knowledge to a civilization within a vast desert.

[@justaguy5770]

6:23 Trying to picture how Moses' family would have fit on a 30 cubit ark

[@Shade_KHAN75]

6:22 the fact that; according to science human a growing more taller and are taller on the average than they were like 1000 years ago

[@Tai91827]

Ex Muslim of 5 years, the quran claims to be perfect, but is the only book ever not to be in chronological order LOL.

[@VîctørîøûsWåtchmån777]

Yes! Thank you for doing a video on this. I asked for this yesterday. God bless you, my brother in Christ!

[@FabMos1]

Same here man. Thanks, Testify. God bless ya', brother!

[@heartlyartsak8661]

Here in India online Mulims claim two 'scientific theories' in Quran. First is Embryology and second is - Muhammad predicted that deep ocean is dark! 😂

[@robertdegroot8302]

Embryology: You really should have pointed out that in embryology, only the sperm is mentioned. No EGG! Exactly what we'd expect from a fool. Waterbasis of life: firstly, it is wrong because Quran says Jinn are made from (smokeless) fire, so not water. This is because the water verse is not referring to water, but to 'fluid'. It's trying to say life is made from sexual fluid, i.e. sperm. Iron: most iron does not come from meteorites. More importantly, when Quran speaks of 'sending down' something, it doesnt refer to meteorites from space. It just means it's a gift from Allah up in heaven. It also says cattle and clothing were 'sent down'. By the way: when discussing scientific miracles and blunders in Quran, better restrict yourself to use Quran only. Hadith are easily dismissed by Muslims. There are lots of verses to show the earth is flat with the sun circling around it.

[@kyoungd]

Embryology. Good point. Water: This is repeat of the "Primordial Water" creation myth, where water was there before the creation. The Qur'an also mentions that Allah's throne was upon water before creation. Iron: The Qur'an states that God "sent down" iron, as well as other things like kettles. Following this interpretation, one could say that cows were also "sent down" from space.

[@hassabelrasoulomar9183]

You could have spoken with some respect I respect your points thank you❤

[@TheLifeConqueror]

Actually, the claim that there are "no scientific miracles in the Quran" overlooks both the Quran’s approach to scientific knowledge and the limitations of interpreting ancient texts through only a modern lens. The Quran’s language and imagery are not intended to be a science textbook but to guide, inspire, and encourage reflection, using terms understandable in both the past and present. Each point mentioned, if thoughtfully examined, doesn’t debunk the Quran’s statements but shows how complex knowledge has been understood by different cultures and times. For example, embryology as described in Surah 23:12-14 isn’t meant to “copy” Aristotle or Galen, as the speaker suggests, but describes stages that align broadly with what science later confirmed. Many ancient thinkers had theories, but the Quran’s description aligns remarkably well with what we know now, and it stands out in its poetic accuracy for a 7th-century text. On the creation of the universe, Surah 21:30 mentions the heavens and earth once being a single entity, which was then “parted.” This is not merely copying Genesis but speaks of a “oneness” that scientists only began to theorize with the concept of the Big Bang. And when the Quran says, “We made every living thing from water,” it conveys a fundamental truth of biology, discovered centuries later-that water is essential to all life. To assume that desert dwellers had such insight without revelation strains credibility. Saying Aristotle also observed life’s connection to water doesn’t negate the Quranic reference, especially since the Quran’s statement isn’t just a passing observation but an affirmation of a scientific fact that stands the test of time. As for the Quran mentioning “iron sent down from the heavens” (Surah 57:25), this aligns with scientific knowledge that iron came to Earth via meteorites. Yes, the ancients may have referred to iron as “heavenly metal,” but the Quran makes a clear, deliberate statement that iron was “sent down.” This kind of specific phrasing resonates with modern understanding that iron is indeed extraterrestrial in origin. Claiming that such a detail doesn’t qualify as insightful or remarkable ignores the precision in the language chosen. The video mentions that the Quran’s description of mountains as “pegs” (Surah 78:6-7) is not miraculous. But consider: the fact that mountains do have “roots” that extend into the Earth’s crust was only scientifically confirmed centuries after the Quran’s revelation. True, Job 28:9 or Psalm 18:7 in the Bible refer to mountains metaphorically, but the Quran’s term “pegs” directly relates to the modern geological fact that mountains stabilize the Earth’s crust. No ancient text spoke of mountain “roots” in such a stabilizing context until modern geology verified it. Regarding the Quran’s mention of stars as missiles for devils (Surah 67:5), this is often misunderstood. The Quran’s descriptions use metaphorical and symbolic language, not scientific slang, to convey deeper truths and principles. This symbolic style is seen throughout ancient texts, including the Bible, where poetic language describes events in ways that aren’t literal, but deeply meaningful to readers across ages. The claim that the Quran’s view on reproduction is inaccurate ignores that terms like “between the loins and the ribs” (Surah 86:5-7) are general descriptions for locations, not scientific terms. Similarly, the hadith about Adam’s height or camel urine is not part of the Quran’s message, nor is it central to Islamic belief. To take these literally and then use them to undermine Islam is like taking isolated statements from other religious texts and claiming they define the entire belief system. No where in the Quran does it say to "drink camel urine." The prophet just used camel urine once as a medicine to help someone feel better. Even today, scientists use camel urine in some medications that we use because it's effective. The video’s final comments about “miracles” being more like “errors” reveal a misunderstanding about the purpose of scripture. The Quran’s references are worded to offer insights while remaining timeless, inviting deeper understanding as science advances. Miraculous or not, the Quran’s statements, revealed centuries ago, align well with modern knowledge, which is worth thoughtful consideration rather than ridicule.

[@YeshuaIsTheTruth]

That quote at the end is beautiful. You see!

[@TodoWasTaken]

1:00 Perhaps more importantly, the Quran makes no mention of the fertilization of the ovum by spermatazoa, which other ancient scientists didn't know about either. It seems to reflect the idea that babies are made directly from semen, a common misconception in ancient embryology. Something similar can be seen in Surah at-Tariq ayah 6. Of course, semen simply carries the spermatazoa which themselves develop into embryos, but ancient scientists seemed to believe that humans are basically just hardened semen.

[@glmathgrant]

4:13 When you pronounce the word "literally" as "littery" and still have a better grasp on the English language than the Quran has on science

[@TestifyApologetics]

yeah that was an accident and I just let it go rather than re-record and re-upload.

[@abubakaraslam-x4u]

The Quran is not a book of science. The quran gives very concise descriptions about many scientific phenomena. Also, the Quran uses the arabic word مصابيح in chapter 67 verse 5. The word مصابيح means lantern i.e. any source of light. So the Quran cannot be restricted in the meaning of that word to just refer to stars. This therefore makes it evident that the Quran did not get the terminology wrong as meteorites can also be a source of light as it experiences friction upon entry into the earths atmosphere although it (the Quran) is concise and does not focus on science

[@wildanimus2559]

'But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,' ~ 1 Peter 3:15

[@johnwilkizns6770]

Thank you for always dropping bangers. I was wondering if you could would touch a bit more on the nature of God from the Muslims perspective vs the Christian/ Jewish perspective

[@idris_noob]

Aristotle observed that embryos develop gradually over time, but Prophet Muhammad described specific stages of embryonic development that Aristotle did not mention.

[@JoeMCool]

True - because Muhammad got everything wrong, starting with the idea that sperm lives in the mother's womb for 40 to 50 days; also note that Muhammad clearly stated that BOTH the mother AND the father must continue sperm (his from his lower backbone, hers from her upper breastplate) and that whichever of the two O'd first, the child would resemble. Wow. Might scientific. 😅

[@micheledicecioc]

Lets gooo

[@buffalowofficial9181]

Tbh the verse being intentionally unclear, so people can make their own asumptions based on that💀

[@Lord9Genesis]

You Seeeeeeeeeeee! Islam is truuuuuuuuthhh.... Stars are missles and the sun sets in a pool!

[@DoctorJain-vy2gx]

😂😂

[@lancetamama3674]

for being lies

[@anthonytoscano8952]

I was waiting for the comment about water in the desert. I was so happy when I finally landed. Got to send this one to the wife🤣

[@maxmccarrick5671]

Hello, testify! I have 2 questions, one is about the inaccuracy of the LXX and how the church fathers relied on it, and the issue of about the authorship of Timothy and Titus can you answer one of them, it would be much appreciated! if you'd like I can send you my argument of the LXX so you can understand my objection better.

[@TestifyApologetics]

I discuss the pastorals here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJ21eJ-Mp9Kko5I LXX is fine, but I don't have content on that. I don't really focus on OT issues at the moment.

[@maxmccarrick5671]

@@TestifyApologetics Oh thank you! For the LXX the issue I uphold is the LXX is unreliable and incorrect translation. This is only compounded when you see no church father could read Hebrew except Jerome. This means ONLY post Jerome is reliable. Another objection I hold is Isiah 7:14 translation of the word עַלְמָה‎ (Almah) to virgin rather than young women. (Note: I am a native Hebrew speaker)

[@Dee-nonamnamrson8718]

​@maxmccarrick5671 At that time, young unmarried woman would be synonymous with "virgin", right?

[@maxmccarrick5671]

@@Dee-nonamnamrson8718 That argument is an appeal to assumption. Unless you can prove social standards in the antiquity of Israel equivocated virgins and young women as synonymous.

[@sebastiankaczmarek635]

@@maxmccarrick5671 LXX was used by Jesus. modern PROTESTANT scholars literally admit that. your version of the bible came 800 to 1000 after jesus lived and died and even if you push date down , you wil atmost get 100 to 200 after jesus lived and even then we don't know for sure because jews debated eachother which books are inspired and which aren't and if you add some signs of their bias like removing virgin birth to young women you will see big problem with jewish translation. Really man seek information out, early church fathers and jesus himself used LXX so why you don't listen to verison of old testament that god himsef used?

[@jesusforever444]

Happy that My Lord Jesus Christ is the Alpha & Omega, whatever our Lord does is a Miracle

[@KadeKreuger]

As a christian who has studied the Quran, I must say that the strongest piece of evidence FOR it is the way that it is written. Islam claims that Muhammed couldn't read or write, and while that may be false, it doesn't change how absolutely beautifully written the Quran is. If you could make a video on the linguistic structure of the Quran, that would probably be the slam dunk for anyone who has read it with sincerity.

[@anumkhalid1621]

Thanks for reading it sincerely. Quran is a revelation from Allah. Hazrat Muhammad( peace be upon him) recited it and his companions recorded it.

[@AmbatublowOnYou]

@@KadeKreuger thats the best you can think of? Lol even secular texts from the similar regions the quran was written was written more beautifully than the quran. And if the argument is "its beautiful therefore it could be true" is like saying an attractive person is way more trustworthy because theyre eye candy lol

[@idi3284]

I could perhaps shed some light on this. Since you have studied the Quran, you likely are aware that many of the stories found in it are plagiarized. Well, this also accounts for a lot of the Quran’s “beauty”, many beautiful passages from it are just reskinned Christian hymns about Jesus, ironic right? And on a personal note, as someone who has also studied the Quran, even buying and reading part of a physical copy, its not all that beautiful. About 99% passages consist of “X is among the wrongdoers, and surely a most grievous punishment awaits them.” or “Allah is the most X and the All-Y (99 times over)” And for the little parts of the Quran that could possibly be original, the “eloquence” just sounds like an 8th grader trying to do an impression of an English aristocrat, you can so obviously tell Muhammed was trying to use big words and fancy phrases where they add nothing to the text. There is even a Hadith where Muhammed says that he has been blessed with eloquent speech, so we can infer from this he was already somewhat known for his unique style of language, not exactly hard to translate those skills into your “revelations”. Lastly, even if the Quran really was more beautiful and brilliantly eloquent than any human can do (which its not), it can easily be explained as the work of a fallen angel, evil spiritual beings with far greater knowledge and skill than us. Consider the voice we hear from the one TRUE God in the Bible, it is firm, still, and plain, God feels NO need to impress us with fancy words and poetics, when he speaks in first person in the bible, its always in a way the reader can understand, firm, commanding, yet still and plain. Only Satan and his minions feel the need to flaunt with poetics. Hope this helps.

[@KadeKreuger]

Let me be clear, I am not talking about the use of big words, anyone can write big words. But if you look at the Quran in arabic, there are many beautifully written verses that are read the same both forwards and backwards, and has many other amazing literary features which Muhammed did not call attention to, it was only when it was studied many years later that these things were discovered. As for the argument of the Quran perhaps being the work of a demon collaborating with humans, this IS possible, but not at all conclusive. Let's not take away from an interesting discussion by dismissing it as "satanic" without any solid proof.

[@anumkhalid1621]

Some people have made changes in Bible. If one notices similarities between Quran and Bible, its because both are from the same source.

[@hassanrafiqi8820]

His argument about shooting stars being called missiles in the Quran which shoot down devils is not false because in the Quran allah talks to all humanity and all of ages so basically in that age people didn’t knew the concept of shooting stars and that is why it is told in the Quran metaphorically to try and make sense to the humanity of that ages.

[@Petru-r9b]

Yo testify can u debunk the "altered bible" problem? I really didnt manage to get any solid information yet

[@Rocky-ur9mn]

Watch inspiringphilosophy video reliability of the new testament textual corruption

[@stephengray1344]

What do you mean by the "altered bible problem"? Do you mean the Muslim claim that the Bible must have been altered because it contradicts the Quran?

[@JesusSavedMe34]

Cmon man, Muhammad compared to Jesus Is not reliable at all, If I had a choice to choose between Muhammad and Jesus based of their contexts and stories, I would rather pick Jesus, For I want to serve a live Savoir

[@Petru-r9b]

@@stephengray1344 yes, i see all over the internet saying the bible is false cause it was altered and that Jesus didn't really die, its just an alternation of our Biblie and many more blah blahs. And i cant find information

[@stephengray1344]

@@Petru-r9b The copying process for the gospels was completely decentralised, and our earliest manuscripts are exceedingly early compared to other documents from the classical era (we have gospel fragments from the second century and complete copies from the third century). And countless citations of the gospels in the writings of the Church Fathers. This means that any major alteration would have to have been made extremely early on for text critics to detect it. Something as major as "Jesus didn't really die" would have to have been edited out in the first generation of copies for all four gospels. If you want to look for more information on this there's an old Mike Winger playlist called evidence for the Bible and several of the videos deal with this. Or you can read James White's book The King James Only Controversy which is a good introduction to text criticism. Muslims making this claim are basically contradicting their own scripture. The Quran repeatedly claims that the Christians of Mohammed's day have authentic scriptures called the Injeel (the Arabic version of the Greek word for gospel). And that Christians should judge Mohammed's message by how well it measures up to that. Since we have so many copies that pre-date Mohammed we know for a fact that the gospel text the Christians of 7th century Arabia had was the same text that we have today. Watch any video on the Islamic Dilemma for more info on this.

[@samaritan_sys]

There is a song here on YT parodying 'My Favorite Things' from which one line always jumps into my head whenever I hear apologists proclaiming the scientific illumination in the quran: "The quran is perfect, Allah never fibs, semen comes from between backbone and ribs..." Never fails to make me laugh.

[@SalemAhmed-pb4tf]

From the saying of God Almighty: (My sperm-drop came forth from my rib and my backbone) instead of (Man is from my sperm-drop, then he came forth from between my rib and my backbone), meaning the human being is the fetus in his mother’s womb now, then we will return on the Day of Resurrection, meaning he will be resurrected as a new body.

[@SoulFireApologetics]

Gabriel told me you’d post this video.

[@DeadEndFrog]

If one attempts to debunk all religious texts with a consistant methodology, one might arrive at science. If one picks a favourite ideology first, one might just end up with religion, and by picking methodology second, one becomes an apolegetic.

[@briandiehl9257]

He has laid out a very consistent methodology

[@DeadEndFrog]

@@briandiehl9257 'very' isn't enough, im talking about a consistant methodology. I wrote comments on all the videos before too, can't say im impressed by the consistany. Every rule one has should be used to consistantly across all evidence. One would probably arrive at regular ol' science if one did this, but im open to new approaches.

[@caprimercenary2522]

"Bloodshot eyed wojak Muhammad isn't real, he can't hurt you" Testify videos: --- In all seriousness, thank you for your work. I don't always agree with your conclusions, but I do appreciate your works, diligence, and commitment to a very intellectual approach to Christianity. God bless!

[@theotakuoutlook]

Muhammad did his best but he was limited by his time lol.

[@elijahcandage]

1:23 They were of what?

[@moczs]

We finally found it, the ONE PIECE IS REAL !!

[@miovicdina7706]

The thumbnail is 👌

[@qplayer3219]

This is very refuteable because Muhammad peace be upon him, was never able to read and write

[@Andevar0]

He had scribes lmao

[@MythicalMaestro69]

This doesnt prove anything that the video claims. If you want to debate, then debate the problem that have been shown in the video. Not just blindly claim that your prophet is illiterate therefore all of its content is true. That doesnt make any sense the world of science. No wonder your people still act like people from 600 AD. Your reasonal thinking doesnt even developed and you cant even bring any reasonable reason to a debate. Go educate yourself and learn in a scientific way. Not like a caveman that live in the years 600

[@darkwolf7740]

You're implying that Muhammed was stupid. If so, why would you even trust a word he says? Be consistent!

[@qplayer3219]

​@@Andevar0yes but someone else write it for him

[@qplayer3219]

​@@darkwolf7740this us actually a gift from god and because Muhammad was never able to read and write this video is easily refutable 😂

[@Emewn]

It's nice to see people becoming aware.

[@CrisFut7-q3h]

Bro just saying, you don’t have to hate us and pull out reasons for it being fake. Just make videos about your religion, without disrespecting us at the same time 😕

[@Hamilton219]

well, he is not blind hating tho right he is just pointing out the things in the Quran and comparing them to the science

[@betherpflumberm]

@@Hamilton219 However, his stance is hilarious when there is a clear deficiency of science in the Bible. ✝= ❌

[@Therandomdisciple]

Deen responds: (insert Carl Johnson meme)

[@NailTouze-l2k]

Daddy Big Deenis Will be very angry with him

[@AbdulRehman-xq4zw]

I think brother failed in biology exam last year

[@mizutxko]

Muhammad coudn't read or write so he probably got things mixed up, and he's not the best person either.