These guys never value anything that isn't American. If the f22 does the same maneuvers it's fantastic but if a Russian fighter does it they'll question what the practical use is. Double standard.
@VKRenato2 ай бұрын
Sorry, maybe I haven't looking enough, but I have never seen F22 doing anything similar.
@davidrobert71802 ай бұрын
Honestly, I don’t get it. Anything that isn’t American isn’t good enough except the fact that 32 countries still can’t push Russia out of Ukraine
@josh_jc_cheng2 ай бұрын
@@davidrobert7180 because those 32 countries are inidividual volenteers and arms support, and most volenteers already leave Ukraine after the first two years. they ain't sending their unit in like the middle east.
@SlavaKochetkov-sl4of2 ай бұрын
@@davidrobert7180 52 страны, включая все страны НАТО
@FloofyMinari2 ай бұрын
At least f22 is stealthy. Su 57 is not stealthy. Its designers say as much.
@supraptosuryodiharjo43382 ай бұрын
Don't forget the pilot is 60+ yrs veteran, flew 4000 km to the airshow with no G suits or fancy gear, just tshirt and jacket......
@bobbyraejohnson2 ай бұрын
Well he was going pretty slow… so I can that.
@WalknTalknStevnHawkn2 ай бұрын
It's so weird to see this be brought up. I just knew when the image leaked and was being talked about you would see a lot of very low IQ people pretending the guy is "hardcore" just because he flew in a straight line for 4000 km to an airshow. It really just goes to show how your average russkie fanboy is at the mental age of a child.
@polinaalchikhanova16962 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnsonа Вам больше 70?
@nooooru2 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnson take that as a complement, in an airshow
@vikrants.choudhary67622 ай бұрын
@nooooru
@Nemura12Ай бұрын
They are holding so hard to say, dude, that plane is awesome 😂
@Toro_Da_Corsa26 күн бұрын
They were respectful of it i think. I expected different
@parrotbrand27822 ай бұрын
Of course a raptor is better. It has one combat kill against a helium balloon after expending 3 missiles.
@offiz2 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@ВасилийБатарейкин-т9ы2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@randycryptosavage34572 ай бұрын
hahhaahahahahaaaa
@NeilHunt-x7n2 ай бұрын
F22 and F35 won’t stand a chance vs. Su-57
@xalili022 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@mikhailk35722 ай бұрын
- High maneuvers are not so important - meanwhile Su-34 in real combat against 3 patriot missiles
@pavelvladimirov26512 ай бұрын
Jealous?
@aardque2 ай бұрын
I read that it was 5 Patriot missiles, Iron Man, Captain America and Daffy Duck.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
The video I can find is filled with russian shills just like here. Also it only has audio and it talks about evading one missile but somehow all the shills start talking like there is 2, 3, 4, 5 missiles. The one that got away was the exception. Why aren't you talking about all the times that su-34s got shot down by patriot missiles. They took down 3 of them in one night. So now do we start pretending that su-34s are just cannon fodder for the patriot? The exception doesn't disprove the rule and you need to live in reality and stop being shills.
@ffs_9992 ай бұрын
@@aardqueyeah and uSSranians are winning, sure… 🤡🤡🤡🤡
@Oliver-i7q7f2 ай бұрын
Cope russian boy
@littletweeter13272 ай бұрын
its an air show. what do you want them to do? show off their notching skills? so sick of double standard morons in the aviation community. raptor does this exact same thing and people go crazy praising it, but its russian so "wHaT iS tHe PrAcTiCaL pUrPoSe!?!??!." just shut the f up. you are not an 'aviation fan' if you just blindly dog on any aircraft because of its origin sincerely, f16 fan
@vladkorenev26432 ай бұрын
увернись от ракеты с тепловой головкой самонаведения на F35 или F22. по-хорошему по функционалу они ушли не далеко от F117 - упор на малозаментность делает из, формально, истребителей фактически тактические бомбардировщики и ОЧЕНЬ крепко их привязывает к ВНЕШНЕМУ целеуказанию.
@Zappina2 ай бұрын
True. Real aviator fans are looking at the plane and not it's origin. Just as well as experienced (US) pilots are pretty much respect the russian pilots and their aircrafts.
@MzeewaUjiji2 ай бұрын
Except that the Raptor is incapable of doing the "same exact thing"
@ericx83922 ай бұрын
Ur right. Only diffrence is that the f22 and the f35 never saw real combat. They only bomb farmers who have no own airforce or AA. but hey for 1 f35 u can buy 3 su57😂
@ObiWanShinobi9172 ай бұрын
@@ericx8392 Too bad Russia only has 25 of them to sell LMAO. Also both the Raptor and F35 have seen real combat
@AidilSulaiman9722 ай бұрын
Other video that pilot his age 62 age, and he came without a big team. He made everything himself.And the most surprising thing is that he landed in China and got out of the jet fighter without wearing a G suit, just wearing a tactical jacket,He is an experienced pilot who has flown various aircraft.
@dharmdevil2 ай бұрын
Yeah, the guy have the medal equivalent of medal of honor in russia.
@aadvert2 ай бұрын
@@dharmdevil He is a hero of Russia - this is the highest military award
@rosomak82442 ай бұрын
The guy is the chief test pilot at Sukhoi company.
@lagrangewei2 ай бұрын
he actually hop a couple of airport to get to zhuhai. imagine being the chinese airport ground crew watching a SU57 randomly pull up to the tarmac for refuelling... xD that's actually where some of the close in video are from...
@Sauerbrew7772 ай бұрын
He's one of the pilots of all time!
@AbdulazizKarimov-ik7fi2 ай бұрын
Everyone is so Jealous yet can't help admiring the performance of the plane and professionalism of the pilot!
@MiG-318932 ай бұрын
If I were American I would be laughing very hard right now. they have F-22 remember?
@Ruslan_Ivanov20232 ай бұрын
@@MiG-31893 И ГДЕ Ф-22 ? ПОЛЕТАЛ БЫ ПОСЛЕ СУ-57 ? СЛАБО ЕМУ ? СТЫДНО Ф-22 ЛЕТАТЬ КАК СУ-57 ...ПОЗОР
@petermokry80202 ай бұрын
These guys would dare not say anything positive regarding an opponents tech, just as they dare not say anything negative regarding their own countries tech. With 71% of the F-35 fleet not being operational with tech issues (should be around 30% as with most other planes) the Russians are certainly impressed. Bring it on!
@jocax1887232 ай бұрын
Couple of notes: 1) The demos at Zhuhai this year were flown by Sergey Bogdan, Sukhoi chief test pilot, aged 62. He's a legend, but age is slowing him down. Slightly. 2) The plane flown is an older T-50 prototype (specifically, T-50-4 [054 Blue]), so there's a lot of stuff that isn't here that is on a production Su-57. Sukhoi brought two prototypes down to show off - T-50-7 (Blue 057) on static display and T-50-4 (Blue 054) for flying. 3) The prototypes have 2.5D (angled 2D, like the newer Flankers) thrust vectoring, but the production models have new full 3D vectoring engines. We know this because they brought a couple of the engines down to show off too. Source: I was literally in Zhuhai Friday traipsing through the airshow. Hell of a time. Very fun. Would recommend.
@zorkitipafed46262 ай бұрын
You confused T-50-7 with T-50-4. They have very straightforward bortnumbers, easily identifiable.
@NirudhaPerera2 ай бұрын
Edit: rewatched some demos and I was wrong, they hardly seem to move in those too. The nozzles don't seem to move at all compared to other demos of thrust vectoring aircraft. Not doubting that it has it but that was strange.
@jocax1887232 ай бұрын
@@zorkitipafed4626 You are..absolutely correct. Weird I messed this up, considering I have a photo of myself pointing at '057' on static display grinning like an idiot. Corrected, thanks.
@quyiter2 ай бұрын
"Production" they'll be able to afford maybe a dozen of these vs the US 630 F-35s lol
@ExpatZ2662 ай бұрын
So they were getting 3d vectoring perf from a 2d vectoring power plant. Yeah, that should be very concerning to the USAF/USMC.
@usupovtimur7352 ай бұрын
it turns out that today the su 57 is the only combat fighter that has participated in real battles against high-tech air defense systems and defeated them
@lockon2072 ай бұрын
Пока так получается, что это истребитель для борьбы с ПВО. Только непонятно, зачем ему тогда нужно так кувыркаться. Или как?)
@usupovtimur7352 ай бұрын
@@lockon207 Air defense and aviation are two inseparable airborne combat units, and combat fighters are trained from the day of their birth to somersault in the air, just as bombers and passenger planes are not designed for this.Fighting against air defense systems is an important but not the only function of fighters, including the Su 57
@lockon2072 ай бұрын
@@usupovtimur735 А может он сделан только для борьбы с наземными комплексами ПВО?)) Тогда зачем ему акробатика?!))
@usupovtimur7352 ай бұрын
@@lockon207 "aerial acrobatics" is a feature of all modern fighters and the su-57 is not unique in this sense
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
Defeated what? Russia keeps saying they destroyed patriot systems from the 80s to the point that they have somehow destroyed more systems than there are in ukraine and yet ukraine still has systems. ALSO THOSE SYSTEMS ARE FROM THE 80S. You will say any lie, won't you?
@leonardokdc1Ай бұрын
The fact is, the Su-34 avoided 3 Patriot missiles, which shows that maneuverability is essential in combat.
@fis-mat-ies40152 ай бұрын
Sergei Bogdan is really Top Gun. No fiction
@ahmaddanieal94682 ай бұрын
~ No Doulbt & thats for sure ~
@anthonystewart6772 ай бұрын
Su-57 already killed an F-16 from around 200 miles.
@kvsandeshful2 ай бұрын
How many Wars has he fought ?
@kvsandeshful2 ай бұрын
@@anthonystewart677 5th gen v/s 3rd gen ?
@anthonystewart6772 ай бұрын
@@kvsandeshful Well, the yanks always bragging about how the F-16 is so capable even compared to more modern aircraft.
@RustedCroaker2 ай бұрын
The F22 and F35 engines also smoke a lot with a sharp change in RPM. But somehow nobody cares.
@Russell852 ай бұрын
Because they are the best of the best of the best, sir yes sir! u s a, u s a! 😂😂😂
@pajcka2 ай бұрын
Yes. But still 57 is not a boil.😂
@charlesekpima82102 ай бұрын
At this point I think it's becoming a mental case
@Avtomat47742 ай бұрын
Star Spangled Goggles
@philippe81602 ай бұрын
Also this is not a SU-57. But one of the PAK T50 prototypes. This is why you can see the screws in a close up. The SU-57 has improved engines compared to the PAK T50.
@AlexDan-h4u2 ай бұрын
The world most powerful fighter jet. America can never get anything near to this. Jealousy and envy is all I see. Viva Russia 🇷🇺
@hugo-pg5tv17 күн бұрын
Not a single fighter jet is showikg everything at a demo. If u russians really show everything in these demos then that plane is getting killed by a 4th gen. The F-22 ain't even allowed to show everything it can do on a sim
@AAAAAA-yn9rw2 ай бұрын
For those questioning the focus on maneuverability in fighter jets, think about it like this: it's similar to asking why soldiers need to be fit or athletic if they use automatic weapons in battle. Both questions have the same answer.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
That is to get places. You aren't ducking into doorways in a jet and the russian jet is slower than the american counterpart. That was a bad analogy.
@dabo50782 ай бұрын
@@thomgizziz Yes you are when you are trying to out rate a missile or get nose authority on target. Combat is fluid ant not set piece simulations.
@sph19882 ай бұрын
@@dabo5078 It's always funny when people don't realize US 5th gen planes can launch missiles without nose authority, even at targets directly behind them, and we also fire at BVR. You don't need to be fast or fit if you're sniping a caveman in an open field 2km out.
@leonidjohnecuacion97272 ай бұрын
This is the best analogy for me! Spot on!
@thorsb6062 ай бұрын
Dude, the Soviet R-73 was the first off-boresight missile in the world. It was commissioned into service in 1984. Americans copied this tech from them, but here you are claiming credit. LMAO. Typical yankee doodle behaviour.
@mountedpatrolman2 ай бұрын
No matter what the detractors say, the Su-57 is a badass jet.
@haydukethor2 ай бұрын
facts
@warfarenotwarfair56552 ай бұрын
Why has it not gained air superiority over Ukraine then?
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
EXACTLY!
@hrtpdisu2 ай бұрын
@@warfarenotwarfair5655 Because the demo models have special upgraded engines that have a 200h lifespan tops. The serial production engines they can't get the performance done for the new engines without burning through them within a few hundred hours. That's the reason they can't be deployed - for this reason, the serial production is still running old 1970 Soviet Engines.. but then you can't pull off any of the stunts you see in this video.
@haydukethor2 ай бұрын
@ Russia 100% has air superiority in Ukraine. Whatever exists of ukraine’s air force they barely fly if they do it’s likely they’ll be shot down. Russia has not produced a large number of SU-57s yet but they don’t need them in Ukraine.
@Simply_Speaking_com2 ай бұрын
Just accept that this is better than what you have .
@ObiWanShinobi9172 ай бұрын
It isnt though. It isnt even close
@motropolitАй бұрын
@@ObiWanShinobi917😂😂😂
@WestCoastVisitor2 ай бұрын
Impractical manoeuvres at airshows are used to demonstrate the capabilities of the aircraft. They are not necessarily made to demonstrate actual combat manoeuvres.
@ivanlesovik44312 ай бұрын
Чем более манерный самолёт , там меньше его заметность на радарах и вы это должны знать .
@aramisone71982 ай бұрын
It has 5 radars front,sides, wings, back.
@roman335i2 ай бұрын
@@ivanlesovik4431 че за бред ты несёшь? 😂
@roman335i2 ай бұрын
Tell it cpt. America aka Salty Moover 😂 seems he's intellectual capabilitys aren't that good to understand this fact
@barrybend71892 ай бұрын
@@ivanlesovik4431I'd like to point out that those maneuvers would light it up on radar more.
@CK-jo9im2 ай бұрын
I am in a cave in Africa with my star link internet and a few Pet lions guarding the cave entrance watching this video with my chilled Heineken in my hands. This SU - 57 pilot amazed everyone around the world, except for a few sceptics. Bravo to the super performance.
@TC2290-wh5cb2 ай бұрын
Are you Wagner?
@Cnupoc2 ай бұрын
@@TC2290-wh5cbare you retarded?
@BSland2 ай бұрын
😅
@NJ-wb1cz2 ай бұрын
Can confirm, I am Heineken
@leftafricalongtimego90672 ай бұрын
The SU 57 is an Angel Michael
@Daveincc2 ай бұрын
Sad that they gave no acknowledgement of the OG pilot. 62 years old and can still fly that beast with authority. Someone said he flies without a G-suit ! If so that’s just another level up !
@hcmisra86592 ай бұрын
Guys, the thing you all did not know? Mention? is that when Sergi (the test pilot) stepped out of the plane he had no g suit or anything, just slacks and a decent t shirt and his helmet.. Sergi is 62, and the test pilot for Suhoi.. Also this is the 2nd aircraft built, and is actually a T-50. The production Su-57s are quite different - different engines and stealth baffles over and beneath the engine nozzles. He flew the plane from Moscow with one stop and no support or maintenance crew.
@gdiwolverinemale4th2 ай бұрын
There were photos of T-50 being pulled out of a transport. So no, he did not fly all the way.
@josh_jc_cheng2 ай бұрын
slow speed demo doesn't have much Gs pulled
@specc_s14522 ай бұрын
@@gdiwolverinemale4th there are 2 T-50s. One was flown and the other one was transported
@megah1rz2 ай бұрын
@@gdiwolverinemale4th the second plane was for the presentation of the new engine, and the presentation of the plane itself to potential future buyers. the show was private
@gdiwolverinemale4th2 ай бұрын
@@specc_s1452 Sukhoi definitely does not share its organizational details with me, but I find the idea a prototype of an airplane would fly 10,000 miles to an air show somewhat far-fetched
@DioDancer2 ай бұрын
Вот и вся разница. Русские ветераны летают как боги, а кто то видосы пилит и слюной давиться, "мы раптер..."
@alessiosem22382 ай бұрын
Forget about those 2 mate, they are just yankee pilot unwilling to A) be informed properly before produce a video, like call it a SU-57 which is wrong, B ) dismissed any manouvers as useless while when it's a F-22 to perform it is super-kawaii. 🤣
@olgatixomirova36092 ай бұрын
у англичан это в кровИ.
@markhill77432 ай бұрын
one must also not forget that the F22 cost about 10 times as much to develop as the S57.... however, the S57 clearly has the better engines and it has the ability to work together with the Okhotnik (S70), which makes it extremely dangerous
@ObiWanShinobi9172 ай бұрын
Better engines?? The Block 1 F22 was able to do these maneuvers, in the 1990s. The F-22 is going into Block 31 currently. And has been upgraded with its engines several times since then. What are you talking about?? The F22 costs more because it has much more advanced technology, including stealth technology that the SU57 can only DREAM of possessing. You get what you pay for, and when you buy American you WILL get the best.
@rahulrathnayake11042 ай бұрын
@@ObiWanShinobi917 best ? Average Russian Tactical bomber SU34 within payload can easily dodging against 3 incoming patriots missile 😅 Your pet Raptor can do it ? Little doubt😂 I don't know man WTF
@ГретыйТумблер-ф2н2 ай бұрын
@@ObiWanShinobi917 😅😅😅😅😅
@ГретыйТумблер-ф2н2 ай бұрын
@@ObiWanShinobi917 Ваши дорогие танки Абрамс отлично горят от дешёвых российских "Ланцетов" 😂😂
@ra.japanfrcs42742 ай бұрын
@@ObiWanShinobi917Still engine have 2D thrust vectoring, su57 production model have gen 2 engine, The engine also showcased in China,
@Ana-sk4wx2 ай бұрын
The best plane, best pilot. Envy in silence 😂
@markforrest28642 ай бұрын
if its the best plane ,which obviously its not !Why are they afraid to use it. Its because the world will see its crap like all Russian weapons
@hugo-pg5tv17 күн бұрын
Best plane? Horrible stealth lmao
@infinitetk41652 ай бұрын
lol imagine asking the practicality of a maneuvers at air show
@bobbyraejohnson2 ай бұрын
Imagine people getting so butt hurt like you.
@infinitetk41652 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnsonwhat nonsense are you even saying nobody is butthurt🤣😂
@IkBigStepper2 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnsonfool
@roman335i2 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnsonimagine being stupid as moover😂
@beefch33152 ай бұрын
@@bobbyraejohnson My butt is hurt and I’m American.
@08yallvon2 ай бұрын
2:22 sir, can you tell/point the practicality of all things F22s demo in air shows?
@xaber_2 ай бұрын
As an aviation enthusiast I don't really care for people's saltiness on a Russian airplane over their political bias. Su-57 is a great plane and when you put that in the hands of a great pilot it is destined to produce awesome results. It's an air show and this is what exactly what they are going to showcase. It's true that F-22 is still cool and deadly but that shouldn't prevent us from appreciating something else that's awesome.(sorry Mover, but lighten up a little bit mate 😛) For me when it comes to tech - it doesn't matter where the origin is. There's a reason why people still love Tiger tanks, FW-109s and Japanese Zeros from WW2.
@user-di5rm9ee1p2 ай бұрын
It is not only about planes, Sergey Bogdan is one of the best pilots in the world. He was probably not even wearing g suit for this flight.
@xaber_2 ай бұрын
@@user-di5rm9ee1p yeah, I too heard that he wasn't wearing a G suit. He's definitely a pro and this airshow stunts must have been a cakewalk for him. Anyway I'm still glad both Mover and Gonky appreciating a fellow pilot on his capabilities like gentlemen.
@dharmdevil2 ай бұрын
From engineering perspective, that airframe is a work of art. Absolute domination over physics.
@SoloRenegade2 ай бұрын
nope. Russian aircraft lack sophisticated avionics, as we've seen in Ukraine. the Su-57 was picked up by patriot outside Patriot missile range (not stealth). Maneuverability counts for nothing in BVR fights. Russian aircraft have all proven inept in actual combat and lack advanced capabilities.
@maigepresents58402 ай бұрын
What's the F22 deadly against exactly? Hot air balloons are about all its actually gone up against... 😂
@hoilst2652 ай бұрын
MOVER: "What is the practical application of this part?" GRONKY: "It's awesome."
@samuelsuse87462 ай бұрын
Dogging missiles,getting an upper hand in a dog fight and escape from danger zone.
@samuelsuse87462 ай бұрын
Though they're building a stealthy fighter for long range fighting and equipping them with long range hypersonic missiles Suitable for modern warfare. They're also adding advanced avionics and information gathering high tech in these jets. They're lethal machines
@tcbowen122 ай бұрын
Mover. My dude. Why the constant hate?? We're allowed to give praise where it's due.
@themoverandgonkyshow2 ай бұрын
What hate?
@Ncs-Charlie2 ай бұрын
@@themoverandgonkyshow dumb ass American hating on anything which is not made in America.
@MrRjizzАй бұрын
@@themoverandgonkyshow are you delusional or what?
@hugo-pg5tv17 күн бұрын
Where did u see hate? They called it awesome and said the F-22 can do the same thing. Note to fact no fighte rjet goes all out on their limits on air shows. For example the F-22 ain't even allowed to show people everything it can do on a sim.
@MrBunker752 ай бұрын
Когда они в небе встречаются с Русскими,то кричат что это опасно,не профессионально,у них проффессиализм летать прямо,так как до такой фантастики полётов им только мечтать
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
No you don't do risky things because you might screw up and then you have dead people and an international incident for showing off. You are like the people that race in traffic, it doesn't always end poorly and you think you are being cool but the majority of the people on the road think you are an idiot and eventually you make a mistake and cause a bunch of damage and problems.
@alfredohumbertotonina50262 ай бұрын
@@thomgizziz Nadie se luce, cuando te estan haciendo las señales y no hace caso, ahi buscan correrte. Con la escusa de la seguridad hacen lo que quieren y los demas son los locos.
@elenanikitina52062 ай бұрын
у них профессионализм во все времена- это взлететь, отбомбить мирных и вернуться. А когда встречаются с реальными профессионалами- валят в штаны и визжат как истерички😂
@masterp4012 ай бұрын
F-35 aka pregnant sparrow😂
@Ruslan_Ivanov20232 ай бұрын
ТОЧНО..
@Stephen-bq4nq2 ай бұрын
It's a pregnant sparrow that can pull 9G so it's doing alright
@mtf_savage_beasts25652 ай бұрын
Fat Amy
@offiz2 ай бұрын
Good One!!!
@Ariana3212 ай бұрын
@@Ruslan_Ivanov2023 She's called "Fat Amy" for a reason, lol.
@AerospacejackАй бұрын
Being able to get the nose around to target enemies quickly in various ways of course is an advantage, the fact this pilot does not understand that is amazing.
@abca202Ай бұрын
ohh.. he knows it and clearly understands it... he just can't openly admit it here..
@Vandal-ml3mb2 ай бұрын
As a retired Marine Hornet pilot i can definitely say that I love high alpha and great nose authority. The SU-57 maneuvers like a legacy hornet on steroids. I want one!!! 🤫
@Kora8962 ай бұрын
@@OMG1961 👍👏
@llANNIHILATORll2 ай бұрын
Do you know how much of a breath of fresh air realistic honest comments like this are. Id bet American tech overall has a number of superiorities in aeronautics, but when the Russians find an area they can excel boy do they triple down. Why do we have such a hard time saying what we know is true when we want it to be different?
@cestmirvaner10272 ай бұрын
Nemá hák!
@Fischer9772 ай бұрын
Christmas is coming
@gnarl122 ай бұрын
@@llANNIHILATORllok can this jet outturn a IRST, AIM-9X, AIM-120D, Patriot or MICA?
@arianasogdovna50862 ай бұрын
I remember when Putin talked about the Sarmat, Avangard, Yars and Kinzhal missiles, the British and American and many Western media laughed and said that these were cartoons. And I remember when Putin talked about the newest Su-57 fighter, many Western media also laughed. As the Russians say: he who laughs last laughs best. This Kinzhal is the one that destroyed the Patriot system near Kiev and Kharkov, launched from this very model of aircraft. Great respect to the 62-year-old Russian pilot. Russia, only forward!
@TheMiddleVolga2 ай бұрын
Насчёт патриота под киевом))) Я тебе больше скажу патриот по кинжалу отстрелял полный боекомплект ракет(Есть видео), что то в районе 42 ракет и не попал ни одной и был уничтожен!
@roman335i2 ай бұрын
@@TheMiddleVolgaвидео в студию)
@nstvm822 ай бұрын
@@TheMiddleVolgaWet dreams
@conorrush36002 ай бұрын
@@TheMiddleVolgamaybe there's a mistranslation here, 42 missiles from a single patriot?
@TheMiddleVolga2 ай бұрын
@@nstvm82 Сны говоришь???? Ну тогда спи спокойно!)))))
@AoiKaze-xt6rk2 ай бұрын
Beyond the plane, Mr Sergey Bogdan is a legend. No American pilot would survive taking him on when he was in his prime serving in the RFAF
@Stephen-bq4nq2 ай бұрын
Stop with the hero worship
@AoiKaze-xt6rk2 ай бұрын
@@Stephen-bq4nq When a man is qualified on 50 aircraft types, he DESERVES hero worship, at least in my books. Truly a hero of Russia. FWIW, we here in Asia are not exposed to Western Propaganda, but we do value our long standing friendship with the Russian Federation, at least they don't start wars like the US does on a regular basis.
@Stephen-bq4nq2 ай бұрын
@AoiKaze-xt6rk well they levelled cities in Syria,attacked, Afghanistan,attacked Chechnya twice,attacked Georgia and they're now in the process of invading Ukraine so you really need to get out of your dreamworld
@keithgibbons57652 ай бұрын
Maverick would have kicked his ass! /sarc
@AoiKaze-xt6rk2 ай бұрын
@@keithgibbons5765 Yes. American pilots can only kick Russian pilots in the ass in Holiwood movies. LOL
@pork_friedrice2 ай бұрын
How can military aviators not know that the Su57 has 3D thrust vectoring? Shocking
@MH-lh1bf2 ай бұрын
Calm down buddy. They d know everything about it if they where still active duty. Mover & Gonky both retired years ago✌🏽 if you were an airline pilot: Would you get up everyday and study red air? No you wouldnt 😉
@5co7562 ай бұрын
@@MH-lh1bfDude almost every DCS player knows this stuff , so real pilots especially if they make such videos should educate themselves . Just use Google , 5 minutes of work .
@bigredneck7892 ай бұрын
@@MH-lh1bfnot active duty, but their new gig with YT revolves around their supposed "up to date" knowledge of military aircraft and flight/fight tactics in the air.
@lagrangewei2 ай бұрын
this isn't a production Su57, it is using a flanker engine...
@mediviclozada40272 ай бұрын
In denial
@stephenchandler47392 ай бұрын
Just a 61 year old armchair pilot here, i can remember when the MiG-29s and Su-27s debuted at airshows here in the UK. Their wing/body blending aesthetic and maneuvers i hadnt seen by any western aircraft were awesome to see though regardless of the practical applications in actual combat.
@SoloRenegade2 ай бұрын
yes, and they still have that beautiful aesthetic. but in combat they have so far proven inept against western fighters. The Mig29 is all but out of production with few countries still operating them for example.
@Leed8311002 ай бұрын
The pilot flying this jet is 63 years old, so yeah.
@ashhawk23462 ай бұрын
If only we saw them at Airshows in the UK today.. I would love to see the Russian aircraft in person.
@mostlymessingabout2 ай бұрын
Mover is so salty 🧂🧂🧂😂😂😂
@АлександрШершнёв-р6с2 ай бұрын
@@SoloRenegade сколько было реальных боёв су-27 и миг 29 с западными самолётами??? В Югославии когда пара миг 29 полетела на встречу армаде из сотен самолётов? Или в Ираке 10 миг 29 против сотен самолётов западной коалиции ???
@ichan83a2 ай бұрын
The amount of COPE Mover is putting out is just hilarious 😂. Don’t hate congratulate.
@tevandorkin74022 ай бұрын
Bro the F-22 can't do that stop mid air tail down and nose up neither can it do that flat spin and still have control over the direction it goes, SU-57 is awesome
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
The plane didn't stop, that is called a cobra and it was useful decades ago, now it will just get you killed faster. Flat spin is only doable because of the 3d vectored thrust and that screws with its stealth because of how they designed the plane.
@douglascooper19872 ай бұрын
You're Incorrect, 22 can do everything he was doing.😐
@Ruslan_Ivanov20232 ай бұрын
В ГОЛЛИВУДЕ МОЖЕТ ....🤣🤣🤣🤣
@ObiWanShinobi9172 ай бұрын
The F22 can and has done literally everything this SU57 is doing
@samgold98812 ай бұрын
Нет не может🤣. У ф22 подвижных частей 4, у су57 8 частей. Ф22 никогда в жизни не сможет делать то, что делает су57 в воздухе. К тому же, у су57 векторная тяга движется во все направления, когда у ф22 только вертикально. Ни о каком сравнении тут не может быть и речи.
@MightOfMjolnir2 ай бұрын
don't understand half this commentary because it makes no sense... actually after i had watched this when it popped up in my feed a week ago i had to go look up an F-22 demo(circa 2018) and the ONLY noticeable difference between the planes capabilities was the F-22 had slightly faster climb rate and a little tighter turning. but after reading how old the pilot is and the fact he's not even properly suited up it begs the question that they purposely underperformed the planes full capabilities. also lets not forget that "nothing a Raptor doesn't do" is kind of hilarious i'd say more or less that it's the Raptor that doesn't do anything this plane doesn't do BECAUSE it's based on maneuvers and the SU-27 Flanker which was doing aerial acrobatics well before the F-22 ever came onto the scene... timelines fellas, i realize you might not be old enough or maybe huffing too much oxygen in training has killed a few brain cells but ya'll talk like a lot of the people that have dismissed me predicting much of this Ukraine war to at least an 80% accuracy and nailing some things dead nuts on!
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
You didn't predict anything, you have a case of confirmation bias. Also your whole nonsense about not wearing the suit is just nonsense. You don't know the pilot and he is their top test pilot for a reason and you don't even know the g's pulled here or that it could actually do any more you are just literally making stuff up trying to pretend the aircraft is more capable... might as well start saying that the F-22 isnt taken to the limit because the US forbids showing its true capabilities and the reason the russian didn't have a suit was because he didn't need one and this is the limit of what a su-57 can do.
@MightOfMjolnir2 ай бұрын
@@thomgizziz uh... I worked on private charter airplanes(Gulfstream, Lear, Hawker) for a number of years lol. this is an airshow so they obviously can't push stuff into super sonic because of risk of damage to property from the shockwave. and yes I've predicted outcomes with some pretty uncanny accuracy before. I'm just able to extrapolate information better than most people but it does sounds like you need a tampon, a heating pad and some chocolate though if this upset you that much!
@MightOfMjolnir2 ай бұрын
@@davidvaughn7752 yea I saw it was a prototype, usually they're a far cry from the final iteration. the handling will also be different too with a full tank of fuel and weapons onboard so as the event implies "airshow", they're just showing off *some* of the capabilities.
@cdyjv1182 ай бұрын
And you think the Raptor Demo (for how awesome it is) is really showing off that jets full capes?
@MightOfMjolnir2 ай бұрын
@@cdyjv118 because we'll never sell it to anyone it doesn't NEED to compete on any level(it's an airshow, the public just want "flashy"). they did their demo as instructed but the commentary that downplayed the Su-57's demo as somehow being lesser than the F-22's all around and them not being impressed tells me they've never seen any other Russian jet because the Su-27 Flanker wrote the playbook on military acrobatics anything that came after was standing on the shoulders of giants. the US has a lot more technology and we don't need to execute fancy maneuvers so you'll probably never see anything like that ever used in an air to air situation unless Russia or China catch up with the avionics. the MiG-25 is also still the fastest production military jet anywhere in the world that is getting towards the end of it's service life, it's like the A-10 in age but the A-10 program is being reopened because of this entire Ukraine Russia war and the need for CAS while the MiGs are being retired because they simply did not keep up with producing parts. hell even the F-22 program was almost all but shut down but they've taken another look at reopening that and the potential need for a plane that has seen little to no service. F-22 was an expensive program for something we opted not to sell to anyone ever and barely gets use.
@polnoeceloe2 ай бұрын
The good maneuverability of an aircraft so low to the ground can be very useful during a combat sortie. It has more ability to survive, to quickly change direction when danger is detected, it can better react to sudden threats, it can better dodge missiles. If the US did such a show, they would trumpet it to the whole world as a great achievement, but if Russia did it - "Oh, that doesn't make sense."
@MegaPopilu2 ай бұрын
two Americans cooking in their own nostalgic sauce with a touch of envy! Keep it up guys! Russian war pilots have the most up to date and direct experience in the world right now, if you add to this a good airplane... you know 😉
@FraserFir-sb4lk2 ай бұрын
They'd die by the dozens on day 1 if this conflict spilled over. Had it been the US invading Ukraine they would've established near total air supremacy over the bulk of the country in less than 100 hours. Russia has absolutely failed to accomplish this feat after nearly 3 years. They can only maintain limited superiority over select portions of the front lines. The USAF would utterly destroy the VKS, don't fool yourself into thinkin' otherwise.
@MegaPopilu2 ай бұрын
@@FraserFir-sb4lk The United States bases its experience against a regular army on the “heroics” of Vietnam. What you write here is based on the Hollywood experience 😅
@FraserFir-sb4lk2 ай бұрын
@@MegaPopilu Boy, the US could field and logistically support a combined quarter of a million men for a decade straight. In 2 separate countries over 6,000 miles from home. Russia can't move half that many men 120 miles into a neighboring country with a shared land border without a severe logistics breakdown in less than a week. We wasted nearly 2.5 times the entirety of Russia's GDP in GWOT and our economy still grew, and we maintained our status as the world's largest economy. Russia would be so bankrupt every little Natasha and Lyudmila would be lettin' anyone stick anything they want up their turd-chutes for a $5 bill and a potato. No, they wouldn't win a conventional war with the US. They'd get stacked like cordwood. Putin has to hide behind the nuclear bitch switch, child.
@fqeagles212 ай бұрын
During Red flag the US Always put themselves in the worst situation so i don't agree@@MegaPopilu
@barrybend71892 ай бұрын
So where is russia's T-14s and the SU-57?
@VKRenato2 ай бұрын
F22 scraptor flying like that, only if Tom Cruise is a pilot. 😂 Ooo man, the Hollywood really fck you up.
@MlLKMAN2 ай бұрын
@@VKRenato lol iran just found out how good modern russian technology is 😆
@abayyoo42522 ай бұрын
Damn scraptor 🫵🤣👍
2 ай бұрын
@@MlLKMAN you mean all those missiles from Israhell they shot down?
@davemccrillis14702 ай бұрын
@@MlLKMANActually we haven’t seen anything. I haven’t seen evidence that planes were involved. The only videos were clearly missiles and many of them were destroyed in the videos by anti air missiles that they claim to have destroyed.
@MlLKMAN2 ай бұрын
@davemccrillis1470 the iranians haven't seen anything either 😆 😂
@sergeyshorokhov2167Ай бұрын
"В чем практический смысл, в чем практический смысл?" Не надо завидовать так громко, ребята. Практический смысл в том, чтобы показать, что наши самолеты лучшие в мире, а ваши так не могут, вот и всё.
@josh_jc_cheng2 ай бұрын
Gonky got smoked by an Su30 during BFM training when that sukohoi pulled a J-turn during a one circle fight, and there's a video of it. So yeah there's a practical use with all those high-alpha fancy maneuvers that people called "not practical"
@RenesisActual2 ай бұрын
Pretty sure he was referencing the kvochurs bell specifically having no practical use in combat. It looks cool but its effectiveness in any scenario is dubious at best. I don’t think anyone will argue with high alpha capability being useful in dogfight scenarios.
@dharmdevil2 ай бұрын
@@RenesisActual It's not meant for combat, but meant to show off that capability. Cobra and bell could be translated into a useful combat maneuver. J turn for example is a nasty move and from a plane that has the yaw authority as the felon(thanks to its 3d vectoring), it's a deadly AF.
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
@@dharmdevil which is WHY we don't want to fight the Russians! Their fighters, being objectively superior to ours, are deadly AF.
@warfarenotwarfair56552 ай бұрын
Smoked? He bested that pilot 3 out 3 😂. Clearly you didn't watch it. Another absurd Canadian.
@warfarenotwarfair56552 ай бұрын
@@dharmdevilYet Gonky easily beat the SU-30 pilot 3 out of 3 in a Super Hornet.
@necsoiub2 ай бұрын
01:24 is this guy for real?! It's an AIRSHOW not a combat scenario! The "practical application" is to show the maneuverability of the aircraft and entertain the public...
@RedTail1-12 ай бұрын
Are you for real?.. pay attention to what they actually said.
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
Did you miss the part where Gonky said that these maneuvers gave the Russian fighters better nose authority? Did you miss the part where he said that said nose authority would be useful in a fight?
@necsoiub2 ай бұрын
@@markymarknj I'm talking about what the other guy said hence the video timestamp at the beginning of my comment...
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
@@necsoiub okay.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
@@necsoiub You aren't being clear about what your meaning is over both your comments.
@EGvids12 ай бұрын
The Su 57 is so beautiful. Amazing fighter 😎
@mansurazeez22292 ай бұрын
Superb handling of the Su-57 Felon with pilot Sergey Bogdan at the controls! Just look at the short take off and crazy turn and landing!
@Skelterer2 ай бұрын
Well, actually, this arrogant guy who doesn't see anything special in the capabilities of a plane he knows nothing about is right in that the real power of a modern fighter is not so much in what tricks it can do in the air, but in how it is integrated into the overall combat system, and what weapons it can carry. And he knows nothing about that, so there's no point in listening to him. His opinion means nothing.
@НиколайОрлов-ъ4шАй бұрын
Во Вьетнаме было доказано то что иметь ракеты без пушек опрометчиво😅
@jasonkeating9958Ай бұрын
And don't forget that this is the old engine and a prototype airframe, they are now in production of the new engine with multiple angle thrust vectoring, The new engine has over 20% more of everything so it would be interesting to see what that can do.
@PUSHKINcXYEM2 ай бұрын
These guys are jealous.😂
@sabprogroup86232 ай бұрын
That is not the su-57. It is the Pak - T 50 prototype.
@tukituki76802 ай бұрын
💯Да👋😼
@nooooru2 ай бұрын
it is what the russians call it, and they call it SU-57E, on their poster, right in front of the airplane, at Zhuhai airport.
@sabprogroup86232 ай бұрын
@ these specifically at the air show are t-50s. They can label it whatever. That’s for advertising purposes. But those are not the same 57 in production.
@nooooru2 ай бұрын
@@sabprogroup8623 yeah, they should hire you for proper naming services
@kosmos59682 ай бұрын
Да и ещё на старых турбинах прошлого поколения
@Leshka198712 ай бұрын
This is an air show, the main goal is to show the work of the aircraft in extreme modes. There is no point in discussing the practical application of these or those maneuvers. If you are shown how a sports car accelerates to 300 kilometers per hour, this means that at a speed of 200 you will be able to smoke a cigar and steer. If the car accelerates with difficulty to 200, then at 210 it will simply fall apart, that's all.
@danguid27532 ай бұрын
Debates without objectivity, allowing an oversized ego to be expressed. The pilot is in demonstration mode, not combat. Your problem is that you believe yourself to be superior, but you are heading towards disillusionment.
@toriyshaov22452 ай бұрын
F22 smoke as well.
@rendesvouz2822Ай бұрын
Mover: - What's the practical application of this manoeuvre? Raptor pilot: - Uhm.. well, I've never tried such figures, but... Mover: - Wait a second, dude, you just said that there's nothing in this video which Raptor doesn't do! Raptor pilot: - Stop with that Putin's propaganda!!!
@homestyle20002 ай бұрын
"what is the practical application of this maneuver?" it helps sell planes. similar to ads you see plastered around DC meant purely for procurement officers.
@DMGamer-m6d2 ай бұрын
6:53 вашим пилотам очень помогает обзор в ф-16. да так что к нему истребитель незаметно подлетает и пилот роняет кал.
@alexjakobsson11712 ай бұрын
причем подлетает не какой нить стелс а обычная сушка )))
@barraberson2 ай бұрын
Yes, recent intercept 😂
@TheSinsirUA2 ай бұрын
@@barraberson это когда истребитель сопровождения бросил своего подопечного и сбежал? 😁🤣 Да еще и прямо в прицел к вражесскому самолету? Мега крутые пилоты у вас😆🤣😂
@barraberson2 ай бұрын
@@TheSinsirUAYou confused me with muricans 😂
@TheSinsirUA2 ай бұрын
@@barraberson its not for you answer, just in this trend
@galinnedelchev19112 ай бұрын
Interesting how the comments are mainly related to the appearance and maneuvers of the aircraft. And neither of these two "commentators" guessed that this was actually an engine demonstration (anyone who knows at least a little about such engines will know what I mean). And in the world, apart from Russia, there are only two or three other countries capable of building such an engine. And yes... if it's Russian made, it's - Meeh... But if it was American, it would be - Cuttingedge, wonderful, ground breaking and game changer.
@poolboyjohn2 ай бұрын
This Russia jet is only made possible with stolen micro chips from washing machine
@aceace51572 ай бұрын
Yeah, from a washing machine that is made from Russia, lol!
@shavkatparmankulov68162 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@gogadgetgo3125Ай бұрын
And 'spades', LOL.
@victormanuelpolanco9222 ай бұрын
No matter what in front of their eyes. They only watch raptors.
@JesseJames-kv7xc2 ай бұрын
repeat after me: THAT'S FU*** AWESOME MANEUVERS DUDE.
@gamerboy78202 ай бұрын
This thing the T 50 a prototype of the su 57 so it’s kinda a stripped down version without any of the important stuff
@Parim_pravilno2 ай бұрын
Т-50 это первое имя этого изделия, позже он получил официальное название су-57.
@broko34302 ай бұрын
@@Parim_pravilno Ты не понял. Это прототип.
@RustedCroaker2 ай бұрын
Which was disassemble and assembled back probably 20 times.
@gamerboy78202 ай бұрын
@RustedCroaker yup
@Grom0zeka2 ай бұрын
T-50 for Su-57 is like X-35 for F-35. Also, if it flies like that, it meant all the important stuff is onbaord. Some electronics may be not. I know the radar was installed on the 3rd prototype, this one is 4th. Most probably it most important system on board but not the full suit.
@russia_klimovАй бұрын
Это авиашоу. Боевые маневры американские пилоты увидят в реальном бою с этим самолетом )
@vikrants.choudhary67622 ай бұрын
1st of all it's not Su 57, it's PAK FA prototype
@nooooru2 ай бұрын
1st of all, it is what the russians call it, and they call it SU-57E, on their poster, right in front of the airplane, at Zhuhai airport.
@vikrants.choudhary67622 ай бұрын
@nooooru they would, wouldn't they, as they didn't bring the real Su 57E to the airshow, but brought a prototype for crowd display but their aim is to tell Su 57E & not this unfinished prototype. So please buy what they claimed at the airshow rather than match the claims with other data available on internet 👍
@nooooru2 ай бұрын
@@vikrants.choudhary6762 oh yeah, what a bunch of dishonest russians. they really should hire some guy on internet for better naming.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
@@vikrants.choudhary6762 Yes you sell your car by bringing not your car and telling people that it is similar. That sounds like a great idea. How are you this slow?
@vikrants.choudhary67622 ай бұрын
@thomgizziz especially when am doing it in a backyard of somebody who stole the design if my previous car
@chackos1232 ай бұрын
2:15 ................... that maneuver has the practical application of rotating the nose very quickly to get a missile lock. In close combat this has a great deal of "practical" application. Also, "guns only" F18 verses SU57 would result in a US military wife becoming a widow.
@ObiWanShinobi9172 ай бұрын
If you are in a position where you have to rotate like this to get missile lock, the enemy plane has already locked onto you and fired a missile at you which you cant avoid because you are now slow in the air. Its already too late. This maneuver has no value. The only way this works is if youre in a rate fight or a 2 circle fight with another aircraft. And guess what? The Raptor, F35, F-15, and SuperHornet all have insane nose authority as well. THEY CAN DO THIS TOO. Not to mention, you will never get into a dogfight in a modern environment. Combat will ALWAYS be BVR and American stealth ALWAYS wins that
@Russian_Captain_2 ай бұрын
Чувак говорит что в реальном бою эти маневры бессмысленны и это так.Но он забывает что он смотрит демонстрацию маневренности,а как всем известно зачастую, кто быстрей навелся тот и победил.Хотел бы посмотреть мнение американских пилотов,а не любителей.
@Pavel_Nevolin2 ай бұрын
То есть, наш Су-34 "бесполезно" маневрировал от трёх (!) ракет "Патриота" и вернулся на аэродром?
@TheSinsirUA2 ай бұрын
@@Pavel_Nevolin это случайно не в той ситуации когда самолеты прикрытия просто сбежали бросив бомбардировщик, который и сбил Патриот?
@Pavel_Nevolin2 ай бұрын
@@TheSinsirUA Самолёты прикрытия? От ракет ПВО? УА, забыл принять таблетки?.. ;)
@TheSinsirUA2 ай бұрын
@@Pavel_Nevolin кто? ваш дед полоумный?
@Pavel_Nevolin2 ай бұрын
@@TheSinsirUA Мои оба деда уже давно покойные. А полоумный здесь, очевидно, лишь ты. ;)
@salcanales41142 ай бұрын
SU-57 is bad ass !! Superior to F-35 for 1/3 the cost
@cyberdemon65172 ай бұрын
so for 1 f-35 you get 3 russian f22s
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
EXACTLY! That's why we want to avoid a war with them. Unlike our F-22, which is cancelled and out of production, the Russians can produce as many Su-57s as they want.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
@@markymarknj They literally can't. They don't have the parts to do it and they turn them out really really really slow. Stop pretending you are american, comrade.
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
@@thomgizziz we shouldn't be underestimating the Russians. After all, we haven't won a war since WWII. I'm just sayin'.
@markymarknj2 ай бұрын
@@thomgizziz I'm aware that the Su-57s are, shall we say, trickling off the production line? Even so, at least it's still open. They didn't have a Commie Obama cancel it like he did the F-22. That was one of THE DUMBEST decisions ever made! We should have 1,000 F-22s or 500 F-22s and 500 F-23s.
@PedjoGT2 ай бұрын
Truth is that F22+F35 is SU 57
@Ozchuck2 ай бұрын
Neither of those American planes have exposed rivets lol
@cyberdemon65172 ай бұрын
@@Ozchuckprototype model, irrelevant
@MlLKMAN2 ай бұрын
How many su57s are in service? How many hours do russian pilots fly in a year? 😅
@MlLKMAN2 ай бұрын
How is the replacement parts supply and maintenance situation in russia? 😅
@PedjoGT2 ай бұрын
@Ozchuck that is T50 prototype...look pics of SU 57...you have eyes
@douglaswong86102 ай бұрын
Normally, people are excited, these two guys sounded so sour, have you eat a lemon for breakfast? Lunch? And dinner?
@VKRenato2 ай бұрын
😂
@colleenmonfross42832 ай бұрын
I hate to say it but that's one cool jet, from the paint job to it's acrobatic abilities.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
I hate to say it but that is one ugly jet, from the styling to the paint job. The people that like paint jobs like this tend to be the same people that think flames would look cool painted on the jet. The jet looks fat and squished. I'd take chinese or american jets in the cool department over this.
@BerndBarsch2 ай бұрын
Not an Su-57 or Su-57M with new engines, but 4th protoype as T-50. But good to hear a statement without prejudice.
@SoloRenegade2 ай бұрын
It's a su-57. YF-22 --> F-22 X-35 --> F-35 T-50 --> Su57 prototypes are supposed to be well made, hand crafted, high quality representations of their production counterparts. if the prototype isn't stealth, how can you know teh production model is? If you didn't test RAM and such on teh prototype, then how can you know the production model will? It's just a cope from Russia worshippers.
@Ghost904sniperrАй бұрын
Mover man cmon the 57 is dope the cobra is dope , don't be salty I'm a huge fan of yours for years I've never seen u salty like that
@PatriotFalcon2 ай бұрын
The SU-57 is one of my favorite aircraft, as are all Russian fighters. It looks like Mover is not interested in Russian military hardware.
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
So you are biased... and you are trying to throw shade on somebody because they don't have the same bias as you do and you seem to think that you are flexing here.
@owensparks50132 ай бұрын
Mover : Watch this landing! Gonky : Wow, dude, yeah. That was just fun. A couple of dudes enjoying a machine and the skill of the pilot. Just a few minutes of escape from the day to day grind. No politics, no over the top hype. Airshows are awesome. Thanks gents.
@edhouse4826Ай бұрын
Ruskies got the longest range air to air missles now. Should be crazy
@mcal272 ай бұрын
Guys, This is actually NOT a Su-57. It’s a late model T-50 Prototype, hence the slightly smokey engines and rough finish of the body (which has gotten alot of coverage) Russia is using it as a demo unit. Obviously the Su-57’s are ‘busy’ elsewhere
@SoloRenegade2 ай бұрын
It's a su-57. YF-22 --> F-22 X-35 --> F-35 T-50 --> Su57 prototypes are supposed to be well made, hand crafted, high quality representations of their production counterparts. if the prototype isn't stealth, how can you know teh production model is? If you didn't test RAM and such on teh prototype, then how can you know the production model will? It's just a cope from Russia worshippers.
@cyberdemon65172 ай бұрын
aka an early su57, imagine the production sukhois
@vp60872 ай бұрын
This is not a prototype, this is a decoy of a 5th generation fighter
@SoloRenegade2 ай бұрын
@@cyberdemon6517 the production sukhois are in rough shape, many have been shot down.
@mcal272 ай бұрын
@ yeah ok… let’s wait for ‘fat Aimee’ to do the same routine hey? 😉
@Real_Claudy_Focan2 ай бұрын
6:00 The Su57 hold still for 20s, big silence and they talk about paintjob.. Yeah, they are very insecure.
@vusisibanyoni467727 күн бұрын
First time watching the SU57 in action and all they can talk about is the raptor
@enclavex692 ай бұрын
Excellent early warning radar and long range missiles
@Олег16042 ай бұрын
Я читал такое мнение, что при демонстрации таких маневров делается акцент не на саму возможность сделать такой маневр, а показать как работает двигатель при таких режимах.
@falconfighting47932 ай бұрын
Su 57 fly like a dream jet , for any pilot.
@thomaskipkemoingetich35532 ай бұрын
Objective Nice to appreciate good airmanship
@alexkessel59802 ай бұрын
Милые мальчики и девочки! 😊 Российские военные летчики обладают умением станцевать болеро в небе . Я смотрела видео с американской девушкой - военным летчиком. Замечательная красивая блондинка, которую сопровождал к самолёту почетный караул из бравых военных, чеканящих шаг . Более получаса я наблюдала, как симпатичная девушка лет тридцати поправляла обмундирование, обходила , осматривая самолёт , надевала шлем...всякие защелочки, замочки, поправляла очки и микрофон, переговаривалась с командным пунктом...Я ждала увидеть изящество полета, но показали лишь девушку в шлеме с очками расцветки глаз мухи внутри кабины...Было столько восторгов и обьяснений в любви, что я таяла от умиления , 😁 как мороженое под жарким солнцем. Я ждала , ждала и лишь увидела посадку ...забыла , как у нас это называли, когда самолёт несколько раз подпрыгнул...такой своеобразный пук... Но , все это выглядело симпатично, хотя и ...долго... От себя хочу добавить...Не уверена, что такая девушка ,встретившись в небе с российским парнем ...устоит ... Уверена, что не сможет отказаться от приглашения на аргентинское танго...😅 Мне одной показалось, что второй парень , какой ревнивый?
@anthonydempsey7693Ай бұрын
Brilliant 👌 Liverpool UK
@alexkessel5980Ай бұрын
@anthonydempsey7693 Oh... thanks , Anthony , for your so nice words 😁 to me 🙏
@Hanimichal2 ай бұрын
"what is the pratical application of this maneuver" this is just am empty plane showing how it easy to fligh and control, in combat it will be equiped and already tested in many real battles and is approved 👍👍👍🕺💐📣🎸👏
@marcog.95302 ай бұрын
The best aircraft ever
@AlexCamful2 ай бұрын
The practical application is the ability to develop new tactical maneuvers based on machine capabilities. Having such flexibility, pilots feel free in their experiments. Having ability is much more then haven't. You may disagree, but I clearly see your jealousy, you see great capabilities, but anyway looking for drawbacks... as an example, you always blame SU-57 for bad visibility which is relevant for close combat, and at the same time blame maneuverability of SU-57 because nobody uses close close combat in modern warfare. Guys , whom you're trying to cheat?😊 😊
@jojoma40252 ай бұрын
The "crazy maneuver" is part of an airshow demonstration, not a dog-fight which are vastly different arenas.
@RobertoBroche-qm9mq2 ай бұрын
Brutal , only the Russians perform these spectacular maneuvers, I have see the F-22 Raptors perform maneuvers but not like the Russians. The plane they took to the Air Show is not the SU-57 . it is the T-50 Pak Fa , the First Version
@aliyangco81782 ай бұрын
Airmen always respect each other even if they're enemies.
@michealkelly14142 ай бұрын
Unless your Mover😂
@lastmanstanding93892 ай бұрын
You mean real Airmen
@Isaac-muntz2 ай бұрын
Facts ❤
@Jeremy-kq5bs2 ай бұрын
The guy on top trying to act chill while he's clearly shocked by what he's seeing. Lol
@themoverandgonkyshow2 ай бұрын
Nah. Just the Nth time to watch it. Not everyone gushes like a 12 year old girl. That’s reserved for Airwolf.
@atanasvasilev32282 ай бұрын
And still Su-57 has way more enemy jet kills than f-35 and f-22 COMBINED! They got a balloon and maybe a drone. I mean, you must be stressed at what you saw, since you were salty about it even tho it is just uniquely marvellous! 😊
@Belisar5052 ай бұрын
That's why it is called SU-57, F-35 + F22
@Stephen-bq4nq2 ай бұрын
What type of jets has it shot down?
@atanasvasilev32282 ай бұрын
@ Mig-29, su-24, su-27
@davebudah2 ай бұрын
The Mover guy was trying hard to pretend like he wasn't impressed, but he couldn't say anything solid to justify why he wasn't impressed. Anyway the fact that they even did a reaction video is proof that Mother Ruso proved to the world that its machine may not be perfect but its awesome.
@sdm101869Ай бұрын
Mover got Butt hurt there. but I appreciate Gonker's honesty....
@search2learn7762 ай бұрын
Oh my God, they are real Americans. They did not talk anything about the distinctive take-off and the rest of the movements. They were looking for the practical feasibility of each aerobatic movement, forgetting that these movements are to demonstrate the aerodynamic characteristics of the plane. If American planes perform with this quality, why don't you record such videos instead of just talking?
@michaelnoor84232 ай бұрын
A french journalist once interview an F16 pilot in the 80s or early 90s regarding the cobra of the mig and what would he do the pilot say he would eject 😂😂😂😂
@shubhampatil.68612 ай бұрын
Mover was soo sad and pissed that other dude was liking everything about Su57, the joulousy is awesome 😂
@wheelsdeal2 ай бұрын
I dont know much about capabilities but in a beauty contest the Russians win...their airplanes are sexy.
@starikanleks31982 ай бұрын
🤣👍 согласен🇷🇺🖖🤣👍
@thomgizziz2 ай бұрын
I think they look ugly and bulky. So in a beauty contest the Russian lose hands down, I'd take chinese or american planes over the russian ones.
@kostyapetrov6662 ай бұрын
СУ-57 это не просто истребитель, он еще и многофункциональный борт управления боем! раздает целеуказания не только ракетам на борту, но и всему подразделению в связке, в том числе и беспилотнику "Охотник".
@ramario70510 күн бұрын
Они наверное не знают, что рабочее название Т-50 ПАК ФА))) ( перспективный авиационный комплекс фронтовой авиации)