I remember quietly tearing up in metro because I had spent the entire one-hour trip trying to make sense of one single paragraph
@yerimie5 жыл бұрын
Same
@lucreziapellanda92885 жыл бұрын
Kanjani 8 this is me at the moment. Sigh.
@MarceloVieirantr4 жыл бұрын
Put the blame on Kant and his followers
@m-bronte4 жыл бұрын
you don't have to be crazy to understand him but I think it might help.
@gerabadillo78894 жыл бұрын
"Hegel put me off by his language, as arrogant as it was laborious; I regarded him with downright mistrust. He seemed to me like a man who was caged in the edifice of his own words and was pompously gesticulating in prison." Carl G. Jung My thoughts are that Hegel was full of shit and employed that tactic of not being clear to make of himself great, by pretending and creating a language that if nobody could understood it was because they weren't smart enough to understand and made himself into a riddle on purpose. And maybe that is the main influence some nasty intellectuals got from him, elements of deception. Besides some few useful concepts. That's just my theory based on the reflection I quoted.
@essewaxegard94233 жыл бұрын
My first language teacher described reading hegel as literary self harm behavior, and as it would seem this is an apt description
@ewigerschuler39823 жыл бұрын
There are those people actually reading Hegel and those dragging his name in the dirt.
@joshuawalfenzao2 жыл бұрын
Ofc a teacher hates Hegel. Everything Hegel says is what Teachers stand against.
@PerspectivePhilosophy Жыл бұрын
It's a skill, once you understand the Vocab and style it's very rewarding. I have yet to find a richer thinker than Hegel.
@DexterHaven Жыл бұрын
Yeah, the president of my college said his own style of writing was influenced most by Hegel at one point. @@PerspectivePhilosophy
@DexterHaven Жыл бұрын
I wonder if you admire the German of Nietzsche and Wittgenstein as well, who also prided themselves on verbal economy. @@PerspectivePhilosophy
@Epig4209 жыл бұрын
Hegel - "you actually thought I wanted you to understand me, charming"
@hermessantos13438 жыл бұрын
Lol
@matiasmingo92897 жыл бұрын
Of course he wanted. Some philosophers just have simple voices others don't.
@nils1917 жыл бұрын
There is nothing more intellectually dishonest than Marxism. Marx stole his work from the French Socialist, and Father of the Libertarian Socialist school, Joseph-Pierre proudhon. Marx took his works, and degenerated them into a self-destructive and self-loathing jealous ideology.
@tarikfurtado55876 жыл бұрын
+Matias Mingo don't think you got the joke here m8
@kategoss54546 жыл бұрын
@@nils191 Whoo that's a very passionate response. As much respect as I have for Proudhon, he was not 'the last philosopher' and never will be. While I personally believe Proudhon's 'anarchist' politics to be superior to the Communism that grew from Marxism-Leninism, that's no reason to discard the works of Marx, and all the wonderful work done in response to him.
@oipstx5 жыл бұрын
"it might only by 2020's that we'll find the right balance between extremes" 2020: really?
@buildawall58035 жыл бұрын
Perhaps
@whiteduck55635 жыл бұрын
WWIII is here for the balance
@Nernbutt5 жыл бұрын
i just want to be down a few steps on this extreme, the 90s were a good balance i think
@AbdallahTeach5 жыл бұрын
@@Nernbutt a good balance between what?
@Nernbutt5 жыл бұрын
@@AbdallahTeach watch the video and read the comment I replied to. If you don't understand Hegel that's fine but I'm not explaining it in a youtube comment.
@guit64524 жыл бұрын
3:50 hey it's me from the future, 2020 has no balance, it's all extremes, thanks for your time
@andreascabreira3 жыл бұрын
Dont you think its funny that the average agree with this?
@kothostov11 ай бұрын
nah, 2020 was good
@ismeza769 ай бұрын
@@kothostovI mean it was good for me since I had no job, was in CC , found out I excel more with digital courses even if I enjoy in person so all A’s through that year and 2021 😂
@kothostov9 ай бұрын
@@ismeza76 congratulations!
@Nyxthebat048 ай бұрын
@@kothostov Objectively, it was kinda ass
@ShadowMii149 жыл бұрын
I'm going to die before I figure out how to make my interest in philosophy become a way of income.
@ShadowMii149 жыл бұрын
***** Inspired
@MoonLightPhoenixLove9 жыл бұрын
how exactly have you cracked it? Where's this information you speak of?
@NectroSpect9 жыл бұрын
+MoonLightPhoenixLove make youtube videos
@pampstamp9 жыл бұрын
+Skippo If you're good at critical and creative thinking, then it comes easy. If you study philosophy just to study someone else's ideas, then it won't. You won't necessarily get rich off of it either way unless you cultivate above par communication and speaking skills.
@ShadowMii149 жыл бұрын
Mikael Evangale As long as I have a warm place and food I'm rich enough, haha.
@Cthululz19 жыл бұрын
>you will never own a pastry shop named, "Hegel's Bagels".
@PRmoustache888 жыл бұрын
+Cthululz1 Nor "Montaigne's Madeleines"
@MikeGreenwood516 жыл бұрын
As a creative person I created a little one. But it's kept closed as I have something against to many bagels in society.
@keyboardcorrector23406 жыл бұрын
Kek.
@djundag98016 жыл бұрын
"I could not understand the taste of this bread."
@MikeGreenwood516 жыл бұрын
It gets up your nose Shirley.
@user-bn1yj2iw5u7 жыл бұрын
I really love how digestible and simplified school of life makes philosophy. Thank you very very much.
@raptakula84692 жыл бұрын
It is not a good way to seek digestability and simplicity.
@OfficialOffsideBall Жыл бұрын
Its a bad way to learn philosophy like this. Better read the books. This can be a starting point.
@krinkle909 Жыл бұрын
And inaccurate
@highmedic235115 күн бұрын
So simple that they barely covered the importance of Hegel.
@eneanavis7 жыл бұрын
As a German I have to say, that Hegel´s language is pure beauty. It might tend to drown in its own complexity at first sight, but if you read it again and again it unfolds to a thunderstorm of both, lyrical depth and precision. You would lose that quality by simplifying it.
@charlesfraunhofer78934 жыл бұрын
It's a great philosophy and profound like any other philosophy and even has its own books, although 1% of the time the words that don't make sense are a bit odd, especially that part that feels normal but gives you a heightened feeling, which is odd.
@joannebrown38463 жыл бұрын
Shame he didn't write in English. Initials brown
@Audio-qe7cs3 жыл бұрын
dont care + ratio + Sartre better
@jdzentrist87113 жыл бұрын
As an Amercan reader of the translations, I agree and lament I can't read the originals.
@MM-KunstUndWahrheit3 жыл бұрын
I would urge any fan of philosophy to learn german, it might take a long time to reach the levels of depth that is presented in philosophical ststements, but it would be a major adavantage to comprehend those profound people in their own tongue, plus you can flex in german with complex literal terms which I do
@pandacoco2735 жыл бұрын
You are here because you don't want to be like the audience in Jordan Peterson vs Slovaj Zizek debate
@OneMeInMyself5 жыл бұрын
precicely, haha 🙏
@joelwest55415 жыл бұрын
Accurate
@ItsCronk5 жыл бұрын
The audience? More like Peterson himself.
@ofirbenattar95085 жыл бұрын
those who are here are the real learner
@Bluzian745 жыл бұрын
@@ItsCronk You obviously weren't there.
@richardedward1239 жыл бұрын
I think the "Hegelian Dialectic" needs its own video. On this topic, this video leaves me still confused....
@edpavez9 жыл бұрын
Satoshi Chomsky yeah, this video failed to explain the most important aspects of Hegel's philosophy.
@jabeztomer9 жыл бұрын
Satoshi Chomsky his herrschaft und knechtschaft also needs its own video.
@milascave29 жыл бұрын
EduardoPavezGoye It's true. Marx made much use of this idea, but later he was taught as dogma and the idea of the dielectic was used but not understood well.
@DominicGudgeon9 жыл бұрын
Satoshi Chomsky I was actually hoping for that. I want to become more familiar with Marxism and the modern Left, so I have gradually been working back. But to understand Marx, one must understand Hegel, and to understand Hegel one must understand Kant. The video is good, but I think a few minutes on contextualising Hegel would be better - to show where he sat among his contemporaries (or the tradition he was a part of) and his impact. It was a very short comment on his Dialectics, which is probably his greatest contribution to Western thought!
@edpavez9 жыл бұрын
Dee Gee as a hegelian-marxist I think you don't really need to undertand Hegel to understand Marx. sure, it helps, but the problems and questions Hegel rises are totally different from the ones Marx was worried about. Marx is more an economist who happened to use certain elements from Hegel, but you can understand it pretty much reading him directly. Hegel is a different beast who takes years and years to tame and whose work has no practical use in "real life". ;)
@elenacosta10404 жыл бұрын
School of Life: It might only be by the 2020s that we’ll find the right balance between extremes. Netflix in 2020: ‘Cuties’
@Conn30Mtenor4 жыл бұрын
or when a 9 year-old boy dresses up like a drag queen and wears lipstick it's called "brave". I never imagined that the sexualization of children would be called that, but such are the times.
@alaskaoalaska4 жыл бұрын
"the 1960s may have turned out to be too liberal" It's only gotten worse since then, wayyy worse.
@dukemosby55524 жыл бұрын
@@alaskaoalaska Nah dawg. We just have the internet now to broadcast the extremes more. The sixties were next level.
@alaskaoalaska4 жыл бұрын
@@dukemosby5552 We have furries, dude. FURRIES.
@kylevicory26884 жыл бұрын
When this pendulum swings...how far will it go? That's the question
@rossstephen70139 жыл бұрын
This channel has opened my eyes to philosophy and I cannot thank you enough for the great content
@clayroberts29512 жыл бұрын
my coworker from Germany swore by Hegel and I wasn’t able to comprehend what he saw in his philosophy. Anyway after searching for a while I found this video to describe his philosophy (I could only remember his names started with an ‘H’). It’s still not easily comprehendable but it sounds like he is biting a little off of aristotle who said things have a mean. Anything in excess or lacking is not balanced and thus we have to find a balance in everything.
@infinebow78103 жыл бұрын
"In 2020, we' might find a balance between the two extremes". Haha, sure.
@seanhavern98643 жыл бұрын
Both extremes just keep getting worse. two horrible, hateful tribes who think they’re different but they’re exactly the same
@bravefastrabbit7703 жыл бұрын
@@seanhavern9864 Haha perfectly named the Hegelian Dialectic
@stadtjer6893 жыл бұрын
🤠
@shimnakt9553 жыл бұрын
@Arminda Surface damm is it that easy❓😨
@Cellodore3 жыл бұрын
Actually, in a sense we have gotten this dialectic. It's just that the moderate democrats are synthesizing with ever-more extreme proto-fascists.
@STM10664 жыл бұрын
“It’s Hegelian dialectics, not personal animosity”-Caesar, Fallout New Vegas
@fatfuck23844 жыл бұрын
Ave, true to Caesar
@femmemachete4 жыл бұрын
*"Degenerates like you belong on a cross."*
@JohnTrustworthy4 жыл бұрын
*RETRIBUTION!!!*
@SirChips49464 жыл бұрын
Watch yourself profligate
@marloyorkrodriguez99754 жыл бұрын
I know you’re NCR you profligate!
@ibrahimmqami90068 жыл бұрын
He died the following year. *lesson learned*
@christopherbritton26776 жыл бұрын
Ibrahim Mqami roll credits
@MikeGreenwood516 жыл бұрын
Died November 14 1831.
@MagnumBullets476 жыл бұрын
@@christopherbritton2677 plays "now the world don't move"
@christopherbritton26776 жыл бұрын
MagnumBullets47 don’t get it?
@magnomaxx20105 жыл бұрын
"Hegel, a banal, void, disgusting and ignorant charlatan who mixes insanity and nonsense with unprecedented arrogance, what his partisans convey as if it were immortal wisdom held to be true by idiots ... condemned to ruin a whole generation of intellectuals " - Schopenhauer
@josephivernel20785 жыл бұрын
The idea that I like the most in Hegel’s philosophy is about the relationships, when he says that a relationship is the projection of the self in the other that determine the relation. That idea had followed me ever since I read about it.
@Lonewolfdebnf6 ай бұрын
He thinks there is no objective truth what a dumbass
@mrpalmero18 жыл бұрын
Even though I know little about Hegel, I'm quite sure that one of the most valuable lessons that his work can teach you is the fact that we need each other to know what we are and develop our "true" self-consciousness. This video should have explained this as well.
@Sascha____2 жыл бұрын
This sounds beautiful. Any videos relating to this ?
@porteal89862 жыл бұрын
yea I think this is one of the key ideas in the phonomenology
@LucklessGun2 жыл бұрын
@@Sascha____ lol yeah, the christian bible.
@LucklessGun2 жыл бұрын
hegel’s concept is literally just a perspective of dominance. “am i greater or lesser than [object/person]?” “how does it benefit me” “what is my relationship to it?” he makes it sound complicated largely because his writing is not clear or concise, a sign of midwittery.
@porteal89862 жыл бұрын
@@LucklessGun how the fuck did you get that from reading hegel?
@user-ib4bg9kg5s4 жыл бұрын
My Google assistant is going crazy everytime "Hegel" is said in the video thinking it's "Hey Google"
@femmemachete4 жыл бұрын
Hey, Gelgel.
@francis37744 жыл бұрын
OH SO THAT'S WHY!!!! IM GETTING ANNOYED IT POPS OUT OF NOWHERE
@fankaar31604 жыл бұрын
me too
@pattybert5890 Жыл бұрын
Lol “it may only be by the time we reach the 2020s that we find the right balance of extremes.” This aged very well. As an American, I can say that we have not reached a balance.
@highmedic235115 күн бұрын
Therefore, it did NOT* age well.
@Niloneez9 жыл бұрын
I have been a long time lurker of this channel, I just wanted to comment and let yal kno how much I appreciate you guys and gals who work to put up these videos! It has helped coup better with my self and all that is around me! Philosophy is awesome!!
@LordTrashcanRulez2 жыл бұрын
Based
@michallewandowski5706 Жыл бұрын
"It might be by the 2020's that we find the balance between the two extremes" ... that one hasn't aged quite so well
@hayteren5 жыл бұрын
I love this channel. Having Hegel who loved art, and John Locke, who thought it was pointless on the same channel shows there are all points of view
@konoko1002k5 жыл бұрын
Hello from 2020. No, we're still not there yet.
@larissawiratno48784 жыл бұрын
instead what is sex nobody is etting any we're confined to our homes haha
@jacobpetitta70384 жыл бұрын
We are getting there tho, progress is slow and painful like said but it is progress
@tvtitlechampion32384 жыл бұрын
It might be an example of the boulder of Sisyphus, always doomed to roll back down the hill.
@TheBibleWithTina4 жыл бұрын
This is 2020 and we still haven't found the right balance between extremes. We'll revisit in 5 years time.
@Mirrtamirrv4 жыл бұрын
Make it 10
@TheBibleWithTina4 жыл бұрын
@@Mirrtamirrv Lol. 10 it is then.
@juancruzlives11 ай бұрын
2022 here, no signs of balance
@GrahamMilkdrop9 жыл бұрын
I discovered that if I could identify and silence my reaction of annoyance and resistance at reading what appeared to be the same sentence only structured slightly differently over and over again, and then learned to not try so hard to keep all concepts from the start of a paragraph, in a place in my mind where I could consciously remember them all and follow the the links and associations that were being made, then suddenly, reading a page became like the written equivalent of a magic-eye picture of the kind that forms a 3d image when you disengage your standard focus reflex and allow the edges to blur... Not in a pictorial sense like using text characters to render an image but within my mind if the words moved at a steady pace and weren't held back then a blurring of meaning began to take place and I learned that it didn't matter if the concepts fell away into the back of my awareness as they would be contained in the next sentence too... the writing style was doing the job normally done by the 'working memory' or biological version of 'RAM' in the brain which, instead of doing that task as per usual, my conscious awareness had the image of some simple but definitely 3 dimensional geometric shapes forming. It was quite unlike any other book I read and I really wish I had not tried so hard to force it to make sense at every step in the standard way, when I first picked it up, because that was exhausting! If you follow my meaning..!
@cd70028 жыл бұрын
mu
@nordfreiheit8 жыл бұрын
+Graham Loines This is excellent. People assume that Hegel was being cryptic on purpose. But I think his language speaks to us on a different level- one that requires a well-trained mind to read into. Just as I wouldn't dismiss Calculus because the average person who doesn't have a solid grasp on Algebra doesn't understand it, so too is it irrational to dismiss Hegel because many people have a hard time understanding him. He wrote of many different concepts that the video didn't touch on. Studying Hegel is an exercise of the mind and intellect. It teaches us that philosophy should be read carefully and analyzed critically, instead of mindlessly consumed.
@KikomochiMendoza8 жыл бұрын
+Graham Loines Reading this is like listening to a one-sided conversation where one person rambles on delineating their ideas in a flowing manner and at the same time without pausing in order to form a single coherent thought but rather create an entire idea much like a painter brushing on a canvas without once lifting their hand to pause for a moment which is not to say an inherently bad thing rather it can be quite tedious to read as it challenges the reader to keep up with the pace with writer without stopping for a moments breath in order to ponder on the writer's soliloquy. [this is challenging to do, but fun. I should do this more often to piss off my professors]
@GrahamMilkdrop8 жыл бұрын
KikomochiMendoza I have received similar feedback before! It's quite similar to criticism of Hegel's style... but also a potential hazard with attempts at posting conversationally in a KZbin comments section... I think! I'm not an academic and recognise that there are certain structural elements lacking which, would perhaps be habitually included by someone who is regularly submitting work for formal assessment. But... I do enjoy delineating in a flowing way when the mood takes me, especially if I'm ranting... long sentences, sparsely, perhaps incorrectly punctuated, to invite the reader to perform some mental agility in order to keep up, without letting up, relentlessly moving forward but implying that a pause is coming up only to fly right past the opportunity, just to see if the reader managed to keep up and then as I am recalibrating my sense of direction, so as to allow adjustments to my trajectory and slamming on the brakes if necessary (maybe too late... ) without warning... and sliding spectacularly close to the limit.... waiting for the next check-point to come into view (I might just make it after all.... it's gonna be close though...) and then hitting the accelerator as soon as I'm pointing in the right direction... and repeating the process until I have visited each checkpoint and I feel fully expressed! Sometimes it ends up making sense and other times it's just a mess... I can laugh at it either way, and as no grades are going to be affected, might as well write in the way that i like and all the better if it's unexpected! Perhaps I'll install Grammarly sometime in the near future if I am likely to write more regularly... Make it all a little easier on the reader... What do you think...? Good idea?... :)
@Yochillitsthatserious8 жыл бұрын
Absolutely hilarious.
@silvio254324 жыл бұрын
To quote Gregory Sandler - “Frankly, I don’t even know if Hegel got Hegel.”
@daniabadeister15269 жыл бұрын
Could you please put subtitles on your videos? For deaf or hearing-impared people, for non-native speakers who want to learn English with your lectures.
@Josh-vg2lj9 жыл бұрын
+Loïs Jotry Just press the CC button next to settings and theater mode
@daniabadeister15269 жыл бұрын
Joshua Bechhoefer theatre mode?
@Josh-vg2lj9 жыл бұрын
when you mouse over the video on the bottom bar
@MohamadSafadieh8 жыл бұрын
+Joshua Bechhoefer The prom is that the subtitles are auto-generated. That's better than nothing but it's not entirely accurate.
@richardwestwood82123 жыл бұрын
An advice to everyone who wishes to read Hegel's greatest book The Phenomenology Of The Spirit; you should start first with his other book, Philosophy Of History, where he sees ancient empires as moments in the evolution of the Total Spirit, and this is the golden key to his imposing and magestic phenomenological conception. After reading his lectures on the history of Philosophy and his aesthetic theory, go straight to Logic part 1and 2. Don't be overwhelmed by the title, it's really a great read, in it he talks about great cultural events; empty logical categories have no meaning for Hegel. Wish you good luck sisters and brothers, read Hegel for he is the summit of western metaphysics.
@rottensauerkraut60847 жыл бұрын
absolute knowledge is by far one of the coolest parts of philosophy. his ideas about synthesis and analysis are very important to know when your trying to write or be creative.
@manifold.curiosity9 жыл бұрын
Hegel's prose obviously didn't work for me. I gave it a try and, without understanding most of it, I came to think of him as just a metaphysical rambler. Interesting, but too dense for me to sift through casually. Anyway, this video clears things up nicely. Thanks! By the way, there's a fellow on KZbin called Dr Gregory Sadler who does a weekly series delving into The Phenomenology of Spirit. His videos are a little beyond me at the present moment but some of you may be interested in his in-depth reading.
@saIvete9 жыл бұрын
The Manifold Curiosity To be honest with you and everyone, sure this video INTERPRETS his philosophy in a nice manner, but it doesn't -of course- begin to engulf its entirety at any good level. Hegel's philosophy goes way beyond this and in many ways diverges from the narrator's perspectives. With all respect to Alain (who is nonetheless a great speaker), this just falls into an interpretation of the thinker -and this applies to each philosopher and author they cover- and accommodates the thought into their convenience (with the 'optimist' philosophy they are trying to shove).
@SDSen6 жыл бұрын
Read about Taoism must more interesting and real
@esmolol40915 жыл бұрын
Just take Schopenhauer instead and you will be happy. Schopenhauer is all about logical reasoning, Hegel is about magical thinking, which is NOT philosophical at all.
@ObsidianMiner324 жыл бұрын
Philosophy is purely about qualitative things, which you regard as “magic”
@emmanueloluga97704 жыл бұрын
@@esmolol4091 THE FUCK! Have you even bothered to open "The science of Logic"? Damn it with all these overgeneralizations of one of the most rigorous people to ever walk the earth. That is what our society lacks today in non-analytical fields..RIGOUR
@guydeborde32228 жыл бұрын
Hegelian taught us so much more. He taught us about systems and how to create and maintain those systems. He taught us about social media and trends before anyone else as well I believe. Especially with indespensable terms like Zeitgeist.
@lol2333333555558 жыл бұрын
Nope! Try again, Schopenflower fanboy.
@Alrisch9 жыл бұрын
I believe Hegel's prose is really hard to grasp. However, it is not unnecessary as some of you have argued. Hegel's work is way more than just a couple of points. He tried to critically overcome Kant's ideas in order to give us a new comprehension of the world around us. When Hegel argued about history, he doesn't believe exactly that it could be just "useful" to look back and remember something. For him, concepts and reality itself gain meaningful content through processes. In other words, things are now as they are because they were what they were. This idea is specially important for him, because points out that the study of history, in regards to the observer works as a play in a theater in which the observer already knows the end of it. Those who study history, while they do it, know what is going to happen. But the notion of knowing the resolution lets you see the intricate connection between two facts and the possibility of deeper relation between them. Through that, he proposes dialectics as a method of understanding that deeper connection between history and man as a result of history. Because he believed, against Kant assumption, that because things are not presented to us (humans) directly though our senses, it doesn't mean that we can't have access to that other side of reality (absolute). So, in his works, he tries to build reality through his method, in a way in which you can only understand the entirety by observing its entirety. Many readers and academics who work with Hegel will tell you that once you reach the last chapter of the Phenomonology of the Spirit, things just clicked, and a second reading is immediately necessary, for those things that did not make any sense suddenly are comprehensible. And that is not Hegel's prose fault, is is a particular circular way of presenting ideas at the same time than a method. A method that is not easy to understand, but is full of tools to better comprehend reality as an object which resides in society at the same time that society in reality. As Hegel said "philosophy can only be learned by doing philosophy." A last thing. Hegel was a Liberal who argued, during the french revolution, that the principle of Monarchy was the best way to care for liberty and individual rights. You can be in favor or against that idea, but Hegel thought of it because of the particularities of its time. He was profoundly Liberal. The stories say that when he was a Teacher, he used to gather at night with his students to hold conversations about liberty and the french revolution in a time when those practices were strongly prohibited. And one day, one of his students was caught and imprison for divulge Liberal ideas on a public space. As a result, Hegel and his students went on a boat, every other night, to speak to this student imprisoned to speak about Liberal ideas and the news regarding the french in latin (in order to avoid being caught).
@Gguy0619 жыл бұрын
Alrisch I find this insight very interesting. I never thought of things as defined through process
@naimepeci68275 жыл бұрын
Sources?
@erenozdemir55283 жыл бұрын
He was a charlatan.
@lionzion6195 жыл бұрын
If you are interested in Hegels view on history, I recommend you the tragedy of man by Imre Madách, a relatively short drama where Lucifer attempts to make Adam commit suicide by showing him the future of humanity. It has a bit bitter feeling because of the plot, but it is a good presentation of the thesis-antithesis-synthesis system.
@azaichissi59802 жыл бұрын
hi can you recommend other plays influenced by Hegel I"m really interested
@stringtheoryguitars49522 жыл бұрын
Fascinating premise; although Lucifer can't see the future. We fail to grasp the spiritual drama that took place in the garden, so people tend to fictionalize it.
@motostarmx17772 жыл бұрын
@@stringtheoryguitars4952 im not so sure about that..
@stringtheoryguitars49522 жыл бұрын
@@motostarmx1777 Not sure about what, Lucifer’s ability to see the future?
@jameschristopher2540 Жыл бұрын
What bit?!
@ewwwmoreewww72464 жыл бұрын
if 2020 was a piece of writing, it would be of Hegel's
@user-vs1qd1hu2i4 жыл бұрын
Based
@Eliu55649 жыл бұрын
I recommend the Philosophy of History for newcomers; the writing here is significantly more accessible than his other works, such as Logic and the Phenomenology
@sunilprajapati63774 жыл бұрын
Me: *Watching this on 5th June 2020* Video: "it might only by 2020's that we'll find the right balance between extremes" 2020: *snorting cocaine*
@takemytail24414 жыл бұрын
Dang wtf lol
@yoshireallyizbaddclark34234 жыл бұрын
😭😭😭😭😭
@mileslc59254 жыл бұрын
School of life: In the 2020’s we might find balance between the extremes 2020: We shall have extremes with no balance.
@rishabhisthename4 жыл бұрын
A complete visual and intellectual treat, I admire your work, thank you for all your efforts 🙏
@EliasVergsen Жыл бұрын
"It might only be by 2020s that we'll find the balance between extremes." is hilarious
@purpandskizo9 жыл бұрын
Thank you SO much School of Life for making this video! Best channel on KZbin.
@jacobsaintjames9 жыл бұрын
Hegel's work is an attempt at scientific analysis of the eternal present moment. He treated consciousness as having evolved through a succession of primitive forms along with the human body, and saw our consciousness as defined by the archaic structures upon which it was built. The will to dominate was his particular displeasure of mankind, to which he proposed we raise our collective spirit with a will to morality, which he believed to be fundamental knowledge a-priori, possible in all humans possessing reason.
@giovaniprodan38 жыл бұрын
Neat.
@alexd58847 жыл бұрын
Thanks for that. That's pretty much what Hegel is about.
@matthewjefferys18556 жыл бұрын
Jake James Is this a quote from somewhere? KZbin won't let me copy it. Brilliant synopsis either way.
@tvtitlechampion32384 жыл бұрын
Oh, absolutely. The historical context of 'knowledge' is an evolving form built upon antecedent schools and conveyed through multiple conduits, including the Bible and scientific empiricism. The reference points in the content of our character started before literacy. Morality is the skeletal structure upon which the meat of discussion is placed.
@paddyoak125 күн бұрын
Huh?
@HaruKomorebi3 жыл бұрын
I appreciate you guys for going through his writing and transforming it into everyday language. Major props.
@spiritofmodernity9679 Жыл бұрын
It's terrible. Not Hegel at all
@sss584836 жыл бұрын
Philosophy is the best thing humans have invented. Love you hegel from Saudi Arabia.
@boldswagon3 жыл бұрын
Great effort to summarise an otherwise greatly confusing thinker. 5 stars 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
@willferrous86779 жыл бұрын
This is definitely worth the wait. Bravo!
@alauc8 жыл бұрын
I have read all comments and can say that in 7 minutes is not possible interpret his contribution. I have studied 45 years his books. He did help me to understand history. His Philosophy of history is the best one, because he did use four Aristotelian questions. He did give the best answers ( freedom is the purpose, volition and knowledge are means, the state is the form, etc)! Renegation ( negation of negation) is the best interpretation of nsturl and social processes. We need links that people
@xiwang21298 жыл бұрын
but 45 yrs is too much. one never knows how long will stay. I read and taught Hegel last semester and I understood him and my student were pleased...And now in middle of composing my own system of thought...wait!
@wildanfirdausb65307 жыл бұрын
How old are you?
@i1bike7 жыл бұрын
Ante Lauc and how did u contributed to that coruptive country u have in your picture ?
@DraganBakema6 жыл бұрын
Your first two sentences are so full of arrogance, you in-contributing nothing. Make your own channel and do it better than the school of life.. or help, but don't start with arrogance.
@edgarkretschmann47538 жыл бұрын
You guys are on the top of a mountain, with an idea so fresh and in need as never before. I just hope that as many people as possible can enjoy and make good use of this condensed and well interpreted wisdom you sharing with the world. Good job good people, please go on informing :)
@ayam68502 ай бұрын
I become addicted to this channel couldn’t pass my day without watching 3 videos at least.
@universallemon66314 жыл бұрын
Its good to hear Hegel explained in a simple to understand way, hopefully this will encourage more interest in Hegels work, it did with me.
@morethan37563 жыл бұрын
All I know is even Hegelian dialectics can't explain why the Kardashians are famous.
@justbrowsingtheweb77918 жыл бұрын
I think I like Hegel. I'm going to read some of his books.
@J0eman49p8 жыл бұрын
good luck
@lol2333333555558 жыл бұрын
You should uhhh first read the ancient greek philosophy. Then you should read Descartes, Kant, and Martin Luther (yes, the guy who led the protestant reformation). Only then do you have a real basis to start reading Hegel.
@justbrowsingtheweb77918 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I borrowed the book History of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell but I never finished it. Maybe I will return to that book before continuing, recently I've been into kierkegaard though
@soulreaperichig08 жыл бұрын
^his book is too fucking hard.
@Asatru558 жыл бұрын
Hegel isn't THAT hard to read. At least in german i guess. It's definetly convoluted and at times a bit frustrating but i like the sense of satisfaction i get when i think i understood his point finally.
@SeannyOg2 жыл бұрын
"It might only be by the 2020s that we'll find the right balance between extremes", HA!
@mattriarchal5 жыл бұрын
You can tell by the usually relaxing voiced narrator that the difficulty reading hegel really pissed him off
@-_-58814 жыл бұрын
I really agree with the second idea. We are really protective when it comes to our ideas so if we learn from things we dislike, we are more easily able to transition to the correct statement.
@noobieexplorer46972 жыл бұрын
Sadly tho consumer big techs have created an echo chamber for everyone
@MaryamPirzada4 жыл бұрын
2020 here. We haven’t found the balance between the two extremes.
@bomberharris84399 жыл бұрын
I do like Hegel, but every time I've tried to continue reading his "Phenomenology of Spirit", I can't continue because of his writing style.
@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine3 жыл бұрын
The shredder
@kritikajeffrine52744 жыл бұрын
This is one clear piece of knowledge. I wish I could have seen in during my second semester. although, I got the idea but not with this clarity. It explains everything so clearly. I was just able to identify the wires with matching colours, and now it is connected. Thank u so much
@Liwaabeaini3 жыл бұрын
We learn from history that we don't learn from history - Hegel
@cris_yeager5 жыл бұрын
ITS 2020 AND FEELS MORE EXTREME
@SPihlaja9 жыл бұрын
God, these are really good.
@SameekshaRana4 жыл бұрын
Each philosopher has got their own ideas to impart.
@ileilanambingaamtheleader1154 Жыл бұрын
Hegel is awesome, Hegel inspires me everyday 🙂
@the1inAmillionSPERMКүн бұрын
Everytime the speaker in the video said "Hegel" my Android phone started listening as it heard "hey Google" 🤣🤣
@andrewrubner76849 жыл бұрын
Hegel is under-read, he is not that hard to understand if you've read Kant and Marx
@Mollchicken9 жыл бұрын
***** Yeah, and I would even say you can´t understand Marx´ philosophy without knowing Hegel, because Marx made some mistakes we only can understand by knowing dialectic.
@euhm86799 жыл бұрын
+Andrew Rubner I think it also depends on the translation. Marx is very easy to read in Dutch, Kant is still very understandable but Hegel is just awful. I heard it's better in English though.
@MaxvergaxS7 жыл бұрын
He's FAR from under-read, damn most philosophy "academic" papers cite Hegel and his fever dream ramblings
@BobanOrlovic7 жыл бұрын
I have and hegel still makes no sense
@charjl967 жыл бұрын
Why would you want to read Marx? It's better to be ignorant than misled
@ticonimafia9 жыл бұрын
Any chance of doing David Hume? : 3
@woderoll14868 жыл бұрын
nah this channel is way too continental to consider someone logical tbh
@GrahamMilkdrop8 жыл бұрын
I think they will... ;)
@worganyos8 жыл бұрын
Oh really? :P
@DJYungHoxha7 жыл бұрын
they did!
@BCtruth7 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/foSYY3uVeNaNgqc David Hume
9 жыл бұрын
I absolutely adore this channel! XD
@simongarrettmusic4 жыл бұрын
Alain drops some bangers :D fascinating
@jbidwell6054 жыл бұрын
I'm taking the History and Theory of Architecture at Harvardx and have absolutely NO IDEA what the prof is describing about Hegel. Thanks for this video; it clears a lot of things up for me.
@rehmsmeyer9 жыл бұрын
Ahhhh, I see my boy Hegel finally gettin' some air time! Only one man understand him, and rumor has it that even he does not.
@trorisk5 жыл бұрын
"The owls of Minerva fly only at dusk."
@Guitarista19925 жыл бұрын
I am surprised that the School of Life hasn't made a video on Ludwig Feuerbach yet.
@Clandonw4 жыл бұрын
That was wonderfully pellucid!
@kevingruenofficial3 жыл бұрын
I needed this breath of fresh air.
@paulandreigillesania53595 жыл бұрын
Learn from those you disagree with and you'll learn things you nevernknew about, and maybe you'll find more reasons to disagree with [them] even more. So, win-win!
@sihyuanwu54925 жыл бұрын
I just noticed. This is pretty much one of the only channels on youtube that doesn't remind you to "LIKE, COMMENT, AND SUBSCRIBE!" at the end of the video.
@noahlazarides9413 жыл бұрын
The last frame literally says SUBSCRIBE in bold letters
@krinkle909 Жыл бұрын
Not one idea here can be attributed to Hegel, but the explanation of dialectics is terrifyingly inaccurate!
@Charmhole6 ай бұрын
This video is horrible. Not only does it shit on hegel immediately with no reasoning as to why "it's hard to read cause it just is!!" he then makes no mention of tautology nor thesis/antithesis/synthesis. Disgusting.
@giovanawhitney89042 жыл бұрын
Hegels had an intelligibility problem his students faced with the challenge of editing his writings we can all agree that like we can all agree his insights are truths valuable to any nation to learn from old history to create new and better societies. Absolutely inspiring for any leader.
@tullussulla61677 жыл бұрын
ShoddyCast brought me here. And I like it, you sir just got a new Subb, I always do love history and vids like this.
@danieldemarse80993 жыл бұрын
every description in these videos is utilitarian. which is ok, but there was more to kant and hegel than practical applications. i understand that this channel is meant to popularize philosophy, so rarely does The School of Life get into the nitty gritty- attempting a rounded out general conception of the philosopher.. However, I still watch these videos if I need to take a breath above water and get to the core positions of these philosophers, and how they still influence us.
@jamesgraham42428 жыл бұрын
Guff. I've studied Hegel for decades. This is verbal incontinence.
@5retsam8 жыл бұрын
thesis antithesis synthesis. this process is left out entirely in your description.
@Arnold_Satan_zz1yp8 жыл бұрын
Which is good because those are not Hegelian notions
@B10Esteban7 жыл бұрын
5retsam where do those notions come from ?? Because I'm being taught just that
@srrlIdl6 жыл бұрын
Fichte.
@alessandragerlero48162 жыл бұрын
Very good content❤!!!!
@blug28706 жыл бұрын
Amazing.Should I say just amazing.A very comprehensive talk and/or writing and/or video.
@lisaonthemargins5 жыл бұрын
0:06 What an odd sound. This is someone's name you say?
@danielrosler38932 жыл бұрын
He absolutely did not write horribly. I can't believe that characterization.
@sebastianviruzab79869 жыл бұрын
Heraclitus would have been proud of Hegel.
@alyssa01825 Жыл бұрын
thank you for explaining this in simple terms, I have a presentation on Hegel and I had no clue how to understand and address his philosophies
@joebonyak99903 жыл бұрын
And I thought it was my mental shortcomings not being able to understand Hegel. What a relief!
@KozAndEffect5 жыл бұрын
No master and slave, yeah I'm out
@tubesurfer14475 жыл бұрын
Wannabe victim
@blenderfannr18555 жыл бұрын
@Lisa Jones the master and slave concept is one of the main ideas that Hegel had
@Caligulashorse1453Ай бұрын
I like Kierkegaards view
@undergroundskeptic29168 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain how the idea of community is lost in the modern age? Thank you.
@kuhj2788 жыл бұрын
Because in the modern age we live in a socially atomized, cosmopolitan, and fundamentally secular society. People in the first world are more lonely and alienated from each other than they were even just 30 years ago.
@alirezazarrineghbal60268 жыл бұрын
in my view capitalism and it's work to just survive
@AnnaKraft978 жыл бұрын
The slow but deliberate erosion of the idea of social class which is being orchestrated by economically liberal politicians and the media. We live in an age of selfish, gluttonous individualism and people wonder why we are so alienated from each other.
@undergroundskeptic29168 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your explanation, but could you please give a concrete example to further illustrate this? I still can't quite understand it.
@AnnaKraft978 жыл бұрын
I haven't actually read any Hegel yet, because people say it's extremely complex, although I understand a little bit of it. I would suggest you read or watch some of Slavoj Zizek, because he is very influenced by Hegel. Zizek will explain it better than me, lol. Also, hello fellow mermaid!!!
@AleksandarBloom7 жыл бұрын
I agree on Hegel but Anglo philosophers always confuse 'clear and direct' with shallowness and lack of imagination if not plain mediocrity.
@BaronessStrange3 жыл бұрын
"It might only be by 2020 that we might find the right balance between extremes". Oh dear. I miss 2015.
@Ana-fp7po7 жыл бұрын
Please, put in descriptions informations about the containt used in the videos!! There are so many images and pictures that I wished to learn about, however I dont know how to begin to search...
@Le-cp9tr4 жыл бұрын
“It may only be by the 2020s that we fine the right balance” Greetings from the future: shit’s fucked
@NinjaBassetHound9 жыл бұрын
I quite like the presentation in this video, but I honestly can't accept the fact that not one time the Spirit is mentioned, aside from just the title of the 1807 Phenomenology. And what about the importance of Religion, by which Art receives its truth, or Philosophy, which ultimately gives truth to the entire life of the Spirit, for example?
@fredrikolsson75685 жыл бұрын
School of Life is an atheist project so it comes as no suprise that they're hostile to all things religious or spiritual. E g They refuse to make a video about Carl Jung for pure ideological reasons. Look up its founder Alain de Botton.
@F_M_M4 жыл бұрын
"It might be only by 2020s that we'll find the righ balance between extremes." I rather go on a time machine to the 60s, but it was a good idea :)
@ubaidbutt9709 Жыл бұрын
What is the balance? Elaborate on it
@שאולנקר Жыл бұрын
THANK YOU. I MAY NOT STUDY PHILOSOPHY IN UNIVERSITY, BUT IT'S GREAT TO GAIN KNOWLEDGE OT THIS TOPIC FROM YOUR CHANNEL.
@lukasmisanthrop8557 Жыл бұрын
"it may only be in the 2020s that we will find a balance in the extremes" well.. turns out...