Here's another recent build review of a different contest if you'd like to see more like this! kzbin.info/www/bejne/oKKsc4F4gcSiY9k There is also a playlist with all past build reviews on my channel.
@hatmanbuilder3 ай бұрын
Sometimes I think to myself "Why don't I join one of these competitions?" And then I see the results... I'm not even a builder compared to these people! I think I'll never be on this level. This is just... EPIC!
@captain-ki9hh3 ай бұрын
That's not true. You can do it as well. But the question is, "Do you want to be among these?"
@grim_al_kin3 ай бұрын
@@captain-ki9hh exactly this. You *may* not think that your builds are any good.. but if you ever have had someone, anyone, say "this is amazing" you know you've made it. Don't compare yourself to others.. just grow your own style and techniques. Heck, if you want to join a build competition... DO IT! :P
@RottenApplSalt3 ай бұрын
They were at your level too at one point :)
@bananagaming76123 ай бұрын
Survival building is so much different compared to creative building, survival building without debug and graining with commands is huge for building and of course many other creative aspects, but survival is a lot more about resource gathering and utilizing it as best you can. For example farming 1 million copper for a domed copper roof is gonna take you hundred hour in survival. While in creative only a frw
@hatmanbuilder3 ай бұрын
@@captain-ki9hh Actually after this comment I realised that no, I don't. I prefer to build small player-sized builds without (or almost without) commands and debugging. This builds are cpectacular and fun to look at, but I'm just going for the different style.
@SuperSideKian3 ай бұрын
Thanks for reviewing my build! Having it as a contender for the survival friendly category was actually a decision I made about halfway through. My main goal from the start was to use natural lighting/shadow as well as the irony of an empty community space to make the player feel the solitary theme while they explore.
@vemijoev3 ай бұрын
I loved the one seat that was flipped down, really sold the loneliness for me
@SuperSideKian2 ай бұрын
@@vemijoev Thanks! I hid a few singular props like this around the place to hopefully spread that effect
@ryanthescion2 ай бұрын
with just how important lighting is to artworks its crazy to review these builds with the night vision on. Also, plot 0,1(A_Dancing_Lamp)'s build really showcases their talent for being able to do things but also shows how important restraint is. The build is insanely overloaded and is nearly impossible to make any sense of without going over it with a fine toothed comb. It could easily become the best build of them all if it was more channeled and directed instead of just the explosion of color it ended up as
@solumrat3 ай бұрын
at 39:09 you can see that there is a single seat flipped down, i think that that's probably the idea for the "solitary" aspect of that build, one person using a huge structure meant for many.
@SideBit3 ай бұрын
I noticed that as well and was hoping someone else would. It indeed should maybe have ranked higher for that singular detail, but I guess maybe it wasn't contextualized enough in its summary/details?
@zhenshei93982 ай бұрын
I saw this too! I think there are a few examples within the build, like each section might have a “solitary” element. I noticed one of the theatre rooms had a single chair on the stage in an empty room and I also wouldn’t be surprised if the “empty” library actually had just 1 book, they just didn’t see it.
@acrylicbuilds3 ай бұрын
43:19 Hey that's me! Thanks for the feature. Congrats to all the contestants, a lot of awesome builds came out of this comp!
@Junglespeed75313 ай бұрын
The people who build things like this are not human. I wish i could do even a fraction of this kind of building and have the motivation to even start trying.
@opal95833 ай бұрын
They are human! Just like you and me! All it takes is to start, and have determination, and anyone can do it :) I believe in you! Start!
@Junglespeed75313 ай бұрын
@@opal9583 haha thanks 😊. I’ve been playing on and off since it came out back in 2012. I’ve made some cool bases. Right now I’m working on my own version of a floating island village and my industrial district looks like an alien computer tower, but I could never get to a point where I could stick with it long enough to do something like that though. Life gets busy and I have to step away for long periods of time.
@WILLATRONIX3 ай бұрын
it took the human out of me, 2/5 of my life was spent on that server during those three weeks
@Junglespeed75313 ай бұрын
@@WILLATRONIX See but that's what I admire about builds like what are showcased in this video and other places places like Hermitcraft. There's so much thought, time and effort that go into it. also the programs used in order to create the big stuff like world edit are beyond my comprehension. I might be able to get the hang of it if I had the time but I unfortunately do not.
@warden69082 ай бұрын
@@WILLATRONIX Your build is absolutely insane
@EmissaryofWind3 ай бұрын
I recognized Qu1nten's work immediately! He does a lot of this Renaissance/Neoclassical architecture style but the custom lighting is a new masterpiece for him. Love to see him get recognition for his talents.
@eneliauralguran97893 ай бұрын
There were a lot of exceptional builders in this contest. I appreciate the review of my plot even more, thank you 😀.It was indeed too difficult for me to finish all I wanted in just three weeks. I did my best and I’m glad it looks good, at least aesthetically. And yes, I could have added much more details to certain parts of the spaceship, even for the blue parts, but I started working on the interiors without considering how much time I had left 😅
@duckyboat50843 ай бұрын
You and shovel understood what I was trying to do exactly, appreciate the awesome feedback!
@BlockMasterT3 ай бұрын
Congrats on being in the thumbnail!
@nezzy69743 ай бұрын
Of course I had to watch this video when I saw your awesome build ducky - SenpaiArtic 🤗
@HAGCY2 ай бұрын
To make up for their judgemental judging 😂, this is unreal… every one of them! The amount of time each one must’ve taken is unimaginable!!! And the attention to detail is also insane! Outstanding job to every one of those builders 👏👏👏 something not everyone can do yet alone even a little part of it! Keep it up!
@Nolh263 ай бұрын
The second build is a replica of a small tower from a small and imersive video game (I'only watched 1 video of this geame but I'still recognised the tower, because of how detailled itis 😂
@SinWuu3 ай бұрын
To the builders from this video. It's amazing how your builds make people lose their sense of the game by how realistic they are. I'ts like I'm not even playing Minecraft. Amazing!
@seriouslolos26753 ай бұрын
This is a beautiful representation illustrating how Minecraft is an art medium, a poetry platform, an author's vision of their story come to realization, and how the possibilities are endless. Huge respect for all of the artists. And tysm for giving structure builders a platform to shine. ❤
@feddevandenbrink-lumennn96273 ай бұрын
Thanks for judging, I already thought i'd saw you flying around my build ;) 48:49 - Lumennn
@auromancy3 ай бұрын
really glad to have been a part of this, wasn't expecting to see my own build at the end there! The contest was heaps of fun and I hope to do something similar again. Awesome video
@vimupro64543 ай бұрын
Cool video, would love to see more of these competitions. But please show all the builds without night vision, makes a huge difference
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
I believe I do with the clips of them with shaders. some of them had interiors where nv is necessary to see properly in video. Plus, it's my habit to look at builds this way.
@opal95833 ай бұрын
@@MegRaethere should probably be a way for builders to inform the judges what way it's intended to be seen like
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
@@opal9583 there is. I didn’t judge the the same way I looked at them here
@opal95833 ай бұрын
@@MegRae oh! That's lovely then
@TheLoosestOfGooses3 ай бұрын
Dancing Lamps stuff is so cool!! Awesome video
@r1ght_12 ай бұрын
Hey ! you , Here ? 😂 i see you’re a True artist goose, love your videos keep up your uploads, from a now extremely depressed builder haha !
@Dvdm8572 ай бұрын
The oval shapes in the buried dome might be because in classical architecture the middle columns were usually spaced a little further apart so as to create the illusion of them being equally spaced.
@CarltonBank3 ай бұрын
Qu1ntens build is absolutely beautiful.
@daeins3 ай бұрын
Woooo! This is what I've been waiting for baybeeeee, I was so happy to see you involved in this when it was announced!!
@keinname34003 ай бұрын
WOW ! i love them all thx for spending so much time on them to all the artist !
@ProfJeffy2 ай бұрын
I love that Firewatch tower. It looks so amazing.
@antoninbourgoignie9393 ай бұрын
Each of these builds are mind-blowing
@opal95833 ай бұрын
Gods these builds are incredible. Cant imagine how hard it was to rank them
@vigigy484Ай бұрын
16:43 gerg should not see this! He made an entire video about BLOCK VOMIT, BAAAAAD!
@WILLATRONIX3 ай бұрын
Thanks for reviewing my plot!
@mdcuber21523 ай бұрын
the cathedral gives me vibes of the Vierzehnheiligen cathedral in bavaria but mostly from the interior perspective.
@mdcuber21523 ай бұрын
especially how its on a mountain
@quakxy_dukx3 ай бұрын
Now this is art
@toesnt3 ай бұрын
i had no idea this was happening whattt this is the craziest vid ive seen :o more ppl need to see theseeee
@lemmonaade3 ай бұрын
im still surprised on how little subscribers you have, you deserve at least three times as much !
@CarltonBank3 ай бұрын
I feel that the judges overvalue the importance of texturing. Texturing works in many builds, but I think some builds like TicoChs look better with minimal texturing. Most real buildings are made of a few materials so the texture throughout the building is largely the same. Texturing works for fantastical architecture but having a smaller block pallet makes the buildings more realistic and beautiful in its own way.
@WILLATRONIX3 ай бұрын
i think my build unproves your point, texturing was absolutely everywhere, even though lookout towers are mostly wood
@CarltonBank3 ай бұрын
@@WILLATRONIXi think yours is an exception because of the scale it was built in. Trying to texture a smaller scale building can make it look grainy and messy.
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
Only one thing remains, this is a contest with many other plots to compare things to. I’m not saying it’s bad because it lacks texturing. The purpose of a build review is I’m simply looking for ways each build can be improved. This is how we all learn and grow.
@dr4track13 ай бұрын
Sorry but I am going to disagree with u on this and I see this statement repeated enough that it peeves me whenever I see it. In real life actually buildings are made up of many different materials and materials in real life are was less consistent in "texture" than minecraft is. Any average brick wall in real life that is not brand new(and even then) has way more variation in texture that what u would get in MC when one block with the exact same texture is repeated over and over. Particularly when viewed from up close. In real life most of the time when one looks at a building it will be from far away. If one is trying to take in the whole of a house or building one will have to move back and look at it from quite a few meters away , with that distance being greater as the building gets bigger. In my experience and I look at buildings in real life a lot. I walk a lot (I hate cars , I almost never go in them , I am particularly sensitive to the effect of acceleration)and one of my hobbies is looking at architecture, there are very few buildings that look "good" when viewed from very close. Also "texture" in minecraft is a lot about colour variation and in real life unless a wall or other element was just freshly painted and is in full light there are tons of colour variations in a wall of even the same material. Depending on the weather even 5 years can do a lot to the colour of a brick wall. Reality is much more noisy than a minecraft build if there is no block variation. Noise is a whole subject on its own and while I do not want to expand on the topic too much but reality is noisy. Whether it be sight , sound or taste our bodies are subject to a huge amount of noise on a regular basis. A forest is Hella busy, whether sight or sound there is a lot going on. But our bodies are accustomed to it and in a way anything that is not noisy feels less real. A "straight"line AFAIK does not exist in nature. And digital audio recordings especially in the early days suffered from this. One of the easiest ways to introduce a bit of life and body to a digital recording that is too clean is to introduce a bit of noise in the background. Analog audio recordings are incredibly noisy. Now I would agree with u that in some cases less variation in "texture" can provide an easier viewing experience. But even then my opinion is that it depends on what one is used to. Personally I find the heavy block variation stuff attractive for a while . Even back when MC had less blocks and builders weren't doing it as much as today I favored highly detailed builds that seemed noisy or busy. I am accustomed to it and find anything without a certain amount of noise bare and sparse looking. Builds that do not have much block variation do not look realistic to me. Especially if noise is not introduced with a good amount of finer detail work. What it looks like to me is minecraft or Lego. I personally find it looks uninteresting. I personally enjoy noisy no matter what the scale is. If you are saying that less "textured" can be easier on the eyes of someone who is unacustomed to it. Or that it can work better for a specific composition or that u prefer something less noisy or busy then I would agree on the premise but if u are saying less realistic I am going to have to push back. A photographer or painter or cinematographer spends a lot of time trying to reduce or control "realism" to create a specific effect, theme , feeling or idea imo. Anyways way too long to read and I apologize for inserting myself into your post.
@ProfJeffy2 ай бұрын
11:20 It's from a game called Firewatch. Most of the details come from that game.
@EmissaryofWind3 ай бұрын
I would love to see more reviews from this contest if you want to make more
@MexaHuk1803 ай бұрын
I would like to express my deep gratitude to this wonderful group! Your videos were a real revelation for me: first they attracted my attention to building in Minecraft, and then taught me many useful techniques. Thanks to your tutorials I was able to create my own unique buildings. You inspire and share your skills with us - it's priceless! Keep up the good work, you are doing wonders! 🚀🏗️
@DoggoDoesStuff13 ай бұрын
Shovel sounds so different when he's not forcing the youtuber voice
@gen.tucker60242 ай бұрын
Every single build is crazy good o.O I just spent a week or two making a huge and beautiful build compared to my previous standard, but tiiiiny and giga meh in comparison to this. I mean it kinda looks okay even in comparison to some of these but insanly smaller so it's like a tiny part of any of these builds, and that is being generous. I don't understand how anyone can build any of this in such a short amount of time. For me it takes ages to build a single building even with creative and worldedit. Really new to worldedit but still, don't think I can get super much faster at it.
@gingie20083 ай бұрын
GWON WILL!! timestamp: 8:30
@wii3willRule3 ай бұрын
love your vids, keep em coming!
@crazywarriorscatfan90612 ай бұрын
Amazing!
@Runn1n93 ай бұрын
I personally think its sad that the Buildings were not realy rated after the real quality of the building for exmaple detailing, coloring, etc it mostly is just about epicness. Out of the buildings u showed there were only two which actully had a realy high building quality: Qu1ntens and _astarothhs
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
yeah, these contests are challenging because there's more criteria than just build quality. Theme interpretation is huge, but that combined with other areas of aesthetics, complexity, and originality. That's why we had multiple rewards this time around for those plots that didn't do as well overall but still had great craftsmanship for specific things, like best interior. Every judge has a different idea of what is a good build too. Like all art, it's going to be very subjective.
@benrex77753 ай бұрын
It is awesome what people can do in three weeks.
@micaiah_smbdy3 ай бұрын
Plot 1,1 Tetoala2 had a rose and a bell. A Belle. It feels somewhat beauty and the beast inspired but I’m not sure if thst was really their vision.
@WILLATRONIX3 ай бұрын
yes that was their inspiration
@OTDRGR3 ай бұрын
damn this builds are impressive
@danielwhite2693 ай бұрын
This is so awesome
@mircoedler95523 ай бұрын
Normally I never comment on videos but I had to. I wanted to ask if there is a tutorial for the giant owl statue that is in the background in the beginning of the Video. I would be really interested in building two of those on each side of my base entrance. Great Video too :)
@mircoedler95523 ай бұрын
Please answer me :,)
@WreckJaw3 ай бұрын
awesome builds
@SkyBlueCreationMC3 ай бұрын
Hey! Great video!! I was wondering what mod you are using to rebuild the builds in this video 😊
@bottlewisp3 ай бұрын
the observatory is best, because everything else has too much detail
@SeraphAttack3 ай бұрын
plot 0,1, destroyer of bitrate
@DarthWill23Ай бұрын
8:36 i thought this was a 3d model 😮
@opal95833 ай бұрын
Yooo!! It's shovel!
@PebelWasTaken3 ай бұрын
Good video, but yeah the night vision was annoying.
@mosshivenetwork1173 ай бұрын
Dank
@ZOZOYOYO693 ай бұрын
Minecraft is an art form
@BinaryWhale3 ай бұрын
What version is the server URL in the description? Not knowing much about servers like that, is it OK to grab schematics or world downloads?
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
It’s 1.20.4. While this is a public server I don’t think it’s ok to grab a schematic or download of a build without the builder’s permission.
@BinaryWhale3 ай бұрын
@@MegRae Well Discord has refused to let me use my account for over a decade since I made it, so I guess that's right out. :(
@irubemontes9923 ай бұрын
Is there any world download? I would love to see some of them fore myself, specially the prison
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
I don’t own these builds. I have instructions in the description for how they can be viewed on the server
@mullemeck50153 ай бұрын
Wish u showcased the works with shaders
@thelostenderman-pinoyminec28273 ай бұрын
adding shaders without installing shaders. 25:27
@darren38483 ай бұрын
What is the mod that makes you fly faster in creative🤔
@-scrim3 ай бұрын
W
@sensuku3 ай бұрын
how long did they have to build these?
@Daoist03 ай бұрын
Beautiful builds, I got a question though, did they use chisels & bits or was it some other tools ?
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
@@Daoist0 not chisels and bits but they did have other creative tools like worldedit, FAWE, arceon, axiom, etc.
@zoron173 ай бұрын
how can i submit?
@jonelmanajero760124 күн бұрын
is this bakery smp
@delta63782 ай бұрын
how do you know the build at 28:15 is a cathedral? cathedral isnt a architectural style, and it isnt based on the size of the building. there are many large churches that are not cathedrals, see for example Basilica of the Sacred Heart, Brussels or the largest church in the world, st Peters basilica in the vatican city. a cathedral is simply a church that has the seat of a bishop in it. these can be very small, see the Holy Trinity Cathedral, Oulu for example. furthermore, the build has no crosses i could see or interior that would suggest it being a church, these suggest to me that the build is infact, not a cathedral.
@MegRae2 ай бұрын
The word "church" also refers to a gathering or group of people, not a building, yet in our modern world we've adapted the word to apply to the building style itself even though Biblcally that's inaccurate. All I know is, everyone I've seen in the building community refers to the style as cathedrals and if nothing else it's a way to define the style without coming up with an obscure term no one recognizes.
@RelaxvibesRV3 ай бұрын
Mod? Link
@thelostenderman-pinoyminec28273 ай бұрын
I get a sense that the Leonardo's and the MichaelAngelo's of today migrated from Fineart (Now dominated by wokeism) to Minecraft.
@frossida3 ай бұрын
What a terrible review for otherwise incredibly beautiful builds. The comments made by the reviewers are so *off* that it hurts to even listen to. The “dialogue” was very shallow, “What do you think of this build?”and comments made are so imprecise yet so wrong. “Detailing… details… what i like about it is detailss… what i don’t like about it is details…” (The “I love the details” comment made for a plot that clearly prioritized forms and silhouettes over everything else is criminal. And vice versa, comments such as “It’s too much to look at” to a build that CLEARLY aims to look chaotic and manic with pearlescent colors.) I don’t comment that frequently, but the ENTIRE commentating was terrible, so I couldn’t help myself.
@MegRae3 ай бұрын
I'm sorry youtube recommended a video you didn't enjoy, but I've never claimed to be an expert commentator. Watch at your own risk! :) Also, was not expecting it to get this much attention.
@donteatdanktrains54803 ай бұрын
you dont have to listen to the dialogue :) also constructive criticism is probably better than just plain hating
@darren38483 ай бұрын
What is the mod that makes you fly faster in creative🤔