These Huge Civilizations Have Never Been In A Civ Game!

What are the biggest Civilizations never to appear in a main-line Civ game? Here are out picks!
Music: Far Away - MK2
#Civ7 #CivilizationVII #onemoreturn

[@robertgronewold3326]

Okay, if I was to make some suggestions for future civs, I think I would have to go for; 1. Kingdom of Hawaii. I shared this one with you a few years ago and you featured it in a video. Still would be great to see. 2. Navajo. I can see them being a culture and religious focused civ and perhaps the Navajo Code Talker as a unique unit. 3. Kievan Rus. Progenitor of both Ukraine and Russia, and Saint Olga would make for a great leader. I could see her having the ability to use faith to have birds burn a city and take it over.

[@CynepMACTEP]

Согласен с 3 Киевской Руси действительно не хватает

[@BergilSunfyre]

My suggestions- 1- Italy. They're really the only big European country that hasn't appeared yet (unless you count Venice), and the Renascence and merchant republics give good flavor for a culture or science victory, and a focus on trade. The Condottiero could be an interesting unique unit (perhaps with negative upkeep when resting at full health, to represent being hired out. 2- Afghanistan. South Asia is kind of an undersampled part of the map (just Persia and a unified India), and they could be a good military civilization. Massoud or Durrani would both be potential leaders. 3- For a really obscure suggestion, the Gunditjmara. Not that historically influential, but I think they deserve respect for being one of the few civilization to independently invent agriculture, and they did it in a different way then everyone else, using eels a founder 'crop'. I'm imagining a unique district that acts like a dam, but also generates food and is available far earlier.

[@Tytoalba777]

I've mentioned before (years ago) that I want to see Burma under Bayinnaung in a Civ game. His empire was the largest (by area) in South East Asian history, although admittedly that empire collapsed almost immediately after his death. In Europe, I'm interested in seeing a Lithuanian civilization. They were the last pagan realm in Europe and held out for quite a while against the Northern Crusades, and conquered most of what is now Belarus and Ukraine. And in the Americas, I'm interested in seeing the Dakota people make an appearance, most noteworthy for the heavy influence they left on the American perception of the Wild West, Cowboys and Indians and all that, thanks to the Dakota wars

[@CynepMACTEP]

Было бы неплохо увидеть Литву

[@Dr.-Dank]

Honestly, with Poland being a civ, and leaders being able to lead multiple civs in civ 6, I'm surprised they didn't release a Lithuania with Jogaila/Wladyslaw III as a leader for both them and Poland, and/or making Jadwiga a leader for Lithuania. Was a damn shame.

[@jimpy476]

I think Mughal could just be done with Akbar as leader for India with a different UU or UB tbh. I would prefer the Timurids or Kushans or Ghorids for that Central Asian slot. Or Tamils for a different Indian slot. Belgium would never happen because of the Dutch but I do like the idea. I think Serbia or Bulgaria is more likely though in Europe. I'd prefer Great Zimbabwe in South Africa, but again maybe they just need to give us Mandela and Shaka as leaders for the same civ. Would probably prefer Kilwa which covers an area that has never been represented in Civ.

[@Dr.-Dank]

It genuinely infuriates me that Gran Columbia, the flash in the pan that it was, was put into the Civ franchise before Mexico. Mexico is older than Gran Columbia, Canada, and Brazil, and I might be biased in saying this but is just as influential as the later two if not more on global history and culture, so I stan Mexico as needing to be in the next Civ game.

[@iamspamus8784]

Aztecs...

[@Dr.-Dank]

@@iamspamus8784 that's like saying the Gauls are the French, or that the Greeks are the Byzantines.

[@zeytelaloi]

I'd like to play as Singapore.

[@fable147]

Civs I want to see I agree with Belgium and Mughals for your choices. maybe the mughals could also have a bonus to building wonders. Belgium would be a really good one too. Maybe with the belgian congo and their current diplomatic presence they could have a rare focus towards domination and diplomacy. I think the it is a miracle the Kievan rus has not appeared. as they were influential for both the russians and ukraine. for africa I would have chosen the kilwa sultanate. one of the most influential sub saharan civilizations, they had trade networks all throughout Africa, Asia, and the middle east. THey also traded for books, so maybe they could have a trade/science skew

[@iamspamus8784]

Woof. Leopold and Belgium are an AWFUL choice, due to the Colonization issues in the Congo. There is no way this could be chosen.

[@hawke9219]

My pick would be: -Ireland -Nepal -Kilwa Sultanate

[@CynepMACTEP]

Где видео?😢 Wears video?😢

[@MultiplayerMedia]

New videos coming soon!

[@CynepMACTEP]

Ураааааааааааааааааааааааа 😄 yes 😄 thank you

[@CynepMACTEP]

Я хочу азиатские страны вроде Казахстана, монгольской империи т.п.

[@007Boksik]

The most obvious for me is Israel. Seeing Papal States or Great Moravia would be nice too

[@desm3225]

😂 fucking really? What would their featured aspects be? The ability to attack cities without declaring war? Super spies? Zero war weariness? When a city revolts the advisor says, "The filthy Palestinians have revolted!" What's their special unit, "American leftovers?" Will they have a mandatory military alliance with America and England? I could understand Judah or Philistines, but Israel? Sure, if you want millions to refuse to buy your game.

[@artiomarenkov99]

King Solomon will be firee fs!

[@CynepMACTEP]

​@@desm3225согласен Израиль не нужен

[@SarcasticEnchilada]

And Palestine

[@artiomarenkov99]

@@SarcasticEnchilada lol you have the British Empire, Egypt and Saladin. You have Palestine then. Or you want them to add watermalones as a resources?