These Lenses Are Crazy!!! Sirui Sniper F1.2

Getting my hands on the new Sirui Sniper F1.2 Lenses!
What do you think about these?

[@akhyarrayhka4048]

Siruisly Cool Lenses

[@codythep]

Dude, nice

[@rayspencer5025]

I am waiting for Sirui to produce these in RF mount. On my R7 they would be like a 37mm, 53mm, and 90mm.

[@mohammed_the_train_spotter]

guys he's lying, check Arthur's video about these lenses they are not sharp and have bad autofocus 🤨🤨🤨🤨

[@AlexDon]

Why would I lie? I can show you the raw footage I got with these lenses to see how sharp they are. If somebody had a bad result with them maybe they tested it on the wrong camera.

[@mohammed_the_train_spotter]

@@AlexDon maybe because they paid you to lie? kzbin.info/www/bejne/rWa1Y3mMoKlrmdEsi=Dz7YemIS2qMVz8rH

[@TeePham]

Not only Arthur, Jason Morris also. In addition, I mentioned the auto focus issue on Sirui ads. They confirmed the bad focus was correct but they will fix it in the next update firmware. So how do you get the new firmware sooner than the others?

[@AlexDon]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/rJepZKuOZZ57oqM just watch my full review and see for yourself how the autofocus works. I'm not baking Sirui up but don't spread false information if it's not the case. These lease actually perfom good, of course it's not G master autofocus level but it's not the g master price as well so for people who are looking for a more affordable option with good perfomance I think these Sirui lenses are actually very good. @@TeePham

[@danfarmer_photo]

He’s paid by Sirui. In his full review he doesn’t announce a disclaimer so it can’t be trusted. Funny how out of all the reviews, the one who doesn’t have a disclaimer and therefore supported by the brand, magically finds them sharp. I guess everyone else is wrong! 😂

[@ediwitdaheat7798]

Sigma 16,30, and 56 are superior than these in every way. Sharper, way less fringing, weather resistant and price point are about the same. Sigma Wins.

[@mrait]

Hi, do you know what the Sigma model lens called? i need a 35 e mount. Thanks

[@ediwitdaheat7798]

@@mrait well there’s three: $339 30mm f1.4 DC DN | C, $1,499 35mm f1.2 DG DN | A, and the $899 35mm f1.4 DG DN | A

[@duyhungphannguyen3049]

@@ediwitdaheat7798 lol bro comparing 1500$ lens vs 300$

[@ruffmadman]

@@duyhungphannguyen3049 That's if you're comparing the Sirui Snipers against the Sigma Art line. But Sigma also has a kit of 16mm, 30mm, and 56mm Contemporary lenses for around $60 more that stomps all over the Sirui. The Siruis are better cine lenses as the chromatic aberration produces a cool look in video, but for photography, the Sigmas are sharper, have better autofocus (even after updating the Sirui's) and have less chromatic aberration. But if you're looking for a cine lens, why get the Sirui Snipers over the Sirui Nightcrawlers. They Nightcrawlers cost the exact same, but have teeth on the focus and declicked aperture rings...

[@mailais3403]

yeah no shit one costs 4 tines more than the other

[@robertluxamafreethinker]

😍 I wish we could see as well the same move from Mitakon S35 T/1 Primes Lenses with AF soon!! That would be great!!! But, obviously, with more sharpness and details at wide open f/1.0 (T/1) 🤦

[@vukhuat4251]

Just one question: Do they have weather resistence feature? Hope you will reply, thanks.

[@arturshepard2490]

Probably no, they are not expensive

[@yemaneehaile]

How do you get this image quality on a KZbin Short? Please explain...

[@bleucommelebleu]

Mxf

[@ethanfloyd9598]

It’s actually 56mm for the final lens, just clarifying for anyone doing the math and only getting 82.5mm full frame equivalents.

[@Falconry2525]

54mm

[@Falconry2525]

Sorry 84mm

[@nixone1941]

Wow good bokeh. I wonder how it compares to sigma quartet

[@mustafakamal8608]

Quartet? I know only trio

[@ediwitdaheat7798]

Sigma is superior; less fringing, sharper and weather sealing. Sigma wins in every round.

[@tommasomencarelli7952]

@@mustafakamal8608he is right, Sigma has 16mm, 33mm, 56mm and 23mm as well

[@tridinh1011]

Sigma, and even the cheaper viltrox lenses beat the shit out of these things, please dont throw your money away. Save up and get a viltrox pro 27mmf1.2, beats these things in everyway and beats actual 1st party glass in some ways

[@Donovanleonphotography]

I have Sigma Art lenses for good sharpness and I’ve just purchased these for more of a creative film like look…

[@the_designerskitchen]

What do you think? Do they Work on the Ronin 4d???

[@mslater92]

Ronin 4D is a full frame camera so it would only work in one of the cropped sensor modes

[@onlinetraderucom]

Canon rf mount?

[@Angelo_Paduraru]

Unfortunately not. I was looking the same. But this because they have autofocus, canon forbids autofocus third party lens 🙄. If was manual focus, then Sirui made for RF mount.

[@marcosjaviernicanorhernand7036]

No los encuentro en b&h 😢

[@henningmartin2000]

They're not yet released.

[@atherton1ful]

55 it's 56

[@masus7757]

Canon users crying rn

[@alanaperture]

Did they give you a script to read? Lol Several videos on these lenses say the exact same thing literally word for word.

[@mohammed_the_train_spotter]

yes they did, he deleted my comment

[@KwonFiveNine]

Yeah they paid a lot of youtubers to give these good reviews. Luckily I found a couple real KZbin reviews that gave the correct breakdown of these and they're not great, yet

[@mohammed_the_train_spotter]

@@KwonFiveNine he keeps deleting my comments exposing him....

[@fredriksvard2603]

What is a "creative" look?

[@j5daniel182]

3 different “focal lengths”. They are all the same size.

[@KNAPPAID]

Hence " focal " lengths

[@j5daniel182]

@@KNAPPAID referred to “Focal” as “sizes”.

[@KNAPPAID]

@@j5daniel182 oh my bad i forgot bout the video, too focused on your comment 🙏

[@iamwisdomsky]

those fringing on the bokeh balls are so.... yuck! 🤮 gotta stick to sigma.

[@KNAPPAID]

Dont get this if youre doing photos. Get this if you're mostly doing videos. Af i mediocre and its soft - its a nightwalker with af , optical performances are the same - even the dissasembled optics are the same.

[@owenjenkinsofficial]

I have noticed in reviews people on KZbin seem to have issues with softer lenses that are common to cine lens lines because they are used to laser sharp g masters. I haven’t owned the snipers and am not sure how soft they are but I am interested in trying them eventually and getting them if I like them. Definitely a lens series aimed towards a budget film and narrative type of cinematography, not the clinical g master KZbinr look. I totally understand the bokeh fringing is debatable on whether that’s just poor construction or a tasteful vintage look, given plenty of other higher end detuned lens footage I’ve seen still have much less fringing on the bokeh. It’s open to debate. I have seen reviews that show that fringing is only really prominent at the T1.2-2 range and it cleans up nicely above that.

[@tridinh1011]

​@@owenjenkinsofficialwhy do people have a problem? Because they marketed this as the stills lens and the nightwalkers as the cheap cine ones, we can understand the poor IQ on nightwalker because its apparently cine, but this? Nah, its gonna be torn to shreds for the absolute dogshit IQ