These Whales Officially CONFIRM the Biblical Flood

[@juliebaker6969]

Not just sanctioned, in many states it's MANDATED that hormone "therapy" and medical transition is the ONLY allowable treatment for gender dysphoria. If a tharapist tries to treat the mental delusion instead of the otherwise healthy body, they can loose their licence to practice in that state. This ALSO applies if the person involved WANTS their delusion instead of their body treated. FYI, the same thing applies to homosexuality. "Conversion therapy" (treating the disorder rather than than applauding it), is prohibited in many states.....even when the patient WANTS to be "converted" from homosexual to hetrosexual.....even if they desire to change due to religious beliefs. There is NO excuse for politics to be involved in choices of psychiatric treatment.....none whatsoever.

[@canadiankewldude]

The same, if not worse, here in Canada. God Bless

[@alantasman8273]

Satan is the author of confusion...and the modern state is his tool of convenience.

[@juliebaker6969]

@@canadiankewldude Yeah, I don't know how you Canadians DO it. If I lived in Canada, I'd probably apply for political asylum in the USA, then I'd settle in a solidly red area of a solidly red state.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@juliebaker6969 If you moved from a blue state to a red state you'd raise the average IQ of both places.

[@juliebaker6969]

@@sciencerules2825 Considering my IQ is over 200, I raise the average IQ WHEREVER I am.😘😎

[@be.love.shine.]

Pray for the youth and the country, the Church and Israel ❤

[@RealHooksy]

And Palestine

[@alantasman8273]

@@RealHooksy Yes pray that the Palestinians have some remorse about their atrocities and can start loving their neighbors as themselves.

[@RealHooksy]

@@alantasman8273 Hamas isn’t Palestinians

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@RealHooksy You should actually do some research instead of blindly following your communist cult Masters. Hamas is a Palestinian Islamist political organization that was founded in 1987. It is considered a terrorist organization by many countries, including the United States, Israel, and the European Union. Hamas has been in control of the Gaza Strip, a Palestinian territory, since 2007. Palestinians voted for Hamas. In the 2006 Palestinian legislative elections, Hamas won a majority of seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council, which is the legislative body of the Palestinian Authority. However, Hamas and Fatah were unable to form a unity government, and in 2007, Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip in a violent coup, expelling Fatah officials and security forces. The international community, including Israel and the United States, do not recognize Hamas as the legitimate governing authority in Gaza because of its use of violence and its refusal to recognize Israel's right to exist. Since 2007, Hamas has maintained control over the Gaza Strip, while the West Bank, which is also part of the Palestinian territories, has been governed by the Palestinian Authority. It is worth noting that the Hamas has not held any elections in Gaza since the 2006 legislative elections.

[@MrAuskiwi101]

@alantasman8273 Does it make you feel good to pretend you're helping? Like to give your omni god advice do you? And you like to excuse Israeli atrocities, do you? They are 100 fold.

[@glf2424]

The piece on the gender issue and the people that started this thing never ever realized that it was a slippery slope into an abyss of no return. They don't realize that once the boundaries are pushed and broken, evil will continue to delude and deceive many to push it further and those previous supporters are horrified as how far it's gone. So the quote by R Zaccharias "Sin will take you farther than you want to go, it will keep you longer than you want to stay, and it will cost you more than you want to pay." is so very true.

[@sciencerules2825]

What does that have to do with whale hybrids confirming Noah's Flood?

[@SK-bw2cv]

​@@sciencerules2825 keep watching the video beyond the whale story. Story #2 is on that.

[@SK-bw2cv]

​@@sciencerules2825 start at 05:48

[@ThinkingOutLoudly]

And Ravi Zacharias of all people lived the truth of his own words

[@Woopor]

@@skeeterburke the fossils more accurately. Only someone who loved being taught that racism is fine would be so openly ignorant and hateful

[@SK-bw2cv]

03:10 "whales breed with whales and they make......whales" 😭🤣🤣🤣

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

Just like evolution would predict

[@abashedsanctimony154]

Evolution doesn’t predict anything. Evolution isn’t science. Genetics prediction due measurable science definition. What you are implying is evolution is your religion and god.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@@abashedsanctimony154 I'm sure that made sense in your head. But just try reading it back. I have no idea what you are talking about

[@howdydoodey3872]

Man killed off most of the whales. No wonder wrong whales have nooky with each other. They are rescuing whales in general.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@mattbrook-lee7732 I think you do in a general sense.

[@1jktful]

Sheesh you guys, it’s biblical timescale (including Flood) vs Evolutionary timescale. These two species were not supposed to be able to interbreed on their Evolutionary timeline. Interestingly, like mules, it can be calculated the percentage of fertile hybrids. That is the evidence that it has not been going on for millions and billions of years, as the Evolutionary timeline claims.

[@sciencerules2825]

_These two species were not supposed to be able to interbreed on their Evolutionary timeline._ Where did you get the data to come to that conclusion?

[@zerosteel0123]

​​@@sciencerules2825 we certainly don't get our information from your "sources." You can believe that.

[@JqQn-z2b]

​@@sciencerules2825Why does "data" matter if most "data" contained in textbooks are fabricated? Ever thought of that, smart pants?

[@sciencerules2825]

@@zerosteel0123 Your only source seems to be your nether regions.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@JqQn-z2b Ever think of supplying evidence to back up your false claim most evidence in textbooks is fabricated? Or were you hoping everyone would let you slide on that blatant lie?

[@rockymarquiss8327]

My parents where involved in the early days of Beefalo. For those who don't know, you cross Buffalo and Beef cattle you get Cattlelo's - after years of effort they got one that wasn't. Once down to 3/8 Buffalo they are no longer sterile - making Beefalo - which is 3/8 Buffalo and any type of Cattle... the meat is great!

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

What's your point

[@rockymarquiss8327]

No particular point outside of showing another area of hybrids... the idea of breeding within kinds...

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@rockymarquiss8327 OK. Sounds like a good argument for evolution to me. Wasn't sure if that's what you were getting at

[@rockymarquiss8327]

@@mattbrook-lee7732 not at all. Buffalo and cattle are both bovines... They are of the same kind.

[@sciencerules2825]

Quite off topic but about 30 years ago I was on a motorcycle tour of N. California when we stopped and had lunch at a little country tavern advertising beefalo burgers. Had one and as I recall it was quite tasty. The next day I came down with a terrible case of _E coli_ poisoning which laid me low for 2 weeks. Had nothing to do with the meat _per se_ , just how it had been improperly stored and prepared. Your post just gave me flashbacks. 😮

[@surrenderdaily333]

Instead of Christians being taught to stand on God's Word and Biblical authority, we were all raised to be "nice" and "polite" and "not disagreeable" (in other words, compromise and let more aggressive people have their way in order to maintain peace...) I'm not sure if that wasn't a big mistake.

[@NatalieCarter-t8n]

The political party responsible for pushing this on children should be jailed

[@rossrhodes1963]

I agree. Creationism should not be taught to children. It’s intellectual abuse.

[@Woopor]

What about the party that wants to literally indoctrinate kids with religious ideals?

[@WillCenteno1]

​@Quint-ib4nf i agree to an extent. But who are you kidding which side pushes their demon agenda? No matter what or who gets hurt.

[@burntgod7165]

Yes, creationism is a crime against sanity, and the lie of the world.

[@Gek1177]

Agreed, the Republicans who push bjgotry against LGBT children to score brownie points with their ignorant base should be jailed. Such an evil perversion of Chrstianity.

[@922dwj]

The days of Noah are here on steroids.

[@bbjornr]

so if god killed every human save 2 people, tomorrow...would you be ok with it? i'll give my answer now. it was be the most evil act to have ever happened on earth.

[@Ocapela215]

​@@bbjornr I would be okay with it. Look around

[@chriskdayton]

Thank you for bringing up the transgender issue. I’ve been doing extensive research since my 17 year old Granddaughter said she was trans after being sexually assured by a 48 year old co worker. One thing I would stress is no one can change their sex. There are 6500 differences between men and women. No amount of drugs or surgeries are going to change that fact. In a hundred years if a trans person is is dug up and tests are done on the bones they are the sex they were born with. The problem with “trans”people is in their minds and emotions not their bodies. Get the minds and emotions the healing they need and the problems are solved.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

_"Thank you for bringing up the transgender issue"_ They don't know anything about that. They should remain quiet. Or they embarrass themselves.

[@Ottawa411]

Your bigotry shines through.

[@bewernia]

It's actually "8.35 gazillion years" ago.

[@coolhawk2003]

Lol time is magic

[@IAMhassentyou]

For the word of God is alive and active. Sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. Hebrews 4:12 All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every good work. 2 Timothy 3:16-17 Your word is a lamp for my feet, a light on my path. Psalm 119:105

[@howdydoodey3872]

Sanctimonious clap trap.

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@howdydoodey3872 be careful. God's word never returns void.

[@John-cv9yf]

​@@philhart4849 Have you even given God a chance? How do you know and what if you're wrong.. Where is your proof He isn't real? Furthermore man you have value.. don't go selling yourself out to some theory we're just here on the planet for no reason or purpose. I refuse to hear that.. because God made and loves every single person! Do you not see that the Bible is a love story of God's love for mankind. Even though man has rejected and turned away countless times.. I mean why do you think Jesus came to die on cross? God made a way for us to be saved.. from our own destruction of sin which we chose. You are not an accident! So don't talk like you are one.. what do you have to lose in giving God a chance. We're all going to die someday anyway.

[@PhilHart-j9y]

@@John-cv9yf "Where is your proof He isn't real? " Your logical fallacies are: shifting the burden of proof, special pleading (for your particular god), category error (there is no such thing as proof in science, only in mathematics, liquor and numismatics), projection (you have made your god in your own psychological image), and false witness (claiming that Jesus died on the cross for us). Nobody has ever demonstrated the existence of any god, let alone the God of the Bible. My death is assured and final, and I have no qualms about accepting that fact.

[@ArgothaWizardWars]

I must have missed it. How did those whales confirm the flood, specifically?

[@stanley1554]

me too

[@shadowknightgladstay4856]

As far as I can tell the implication is that the evolutionary theory of time is wrong. And kind as referenced in the flood is the real basis of species. Henceforth proving Noah was a true account. I agree a really round about way to say evolution is wrong again. I'm guessing it helps to beet the moderation of content on the web.

[@stanley1554]

@@shadowknightgladstay4856 oh i see. Thank you for explaining.

[@luish1498]

@@shadowknightgladstay4856 « evolutionary theory of time is wrong. « what?

[@RealHooksy]

They didn’t

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless AIG 🙂🙏✝️ thank you for being faithful to Gods word

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

Except, they're not. Period.

[@gowdsake7103]

Faith when you have no EVIDENCE

[@Patriot-Vibez]

whale then!

[@sandyhardy3419]

Sign of Jonah ?

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Very interesting! Thanks for the info, AIG. Nice to see you guys reacting to a current event. I just saw something on this today over my Internet feed. 🙂🙏🕊️✝️

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

🤮

[@hleigh7201]

​@@--..-...-..-.--.... You need attention that bad? My goodness, grow up.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@hleigh7201 🥺 🤮

[@ediwansilva7761]

please, make videos with cuts of these videos

[@slicknicv1362]

Happy Valentines Day God Bless All Much Love To All ❤❤❤

[@kimpittman4102]

Hello to slicknic1362

[@thunderous-one]

Valentines is of pagan origin and thus none biblical. Proverbs 18:13

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@thunderous-one The holiday is believed to have originated in ancient Rome as a pagan fertility festival known as Lupercalia. The festival was celebrated on February 15th and involved the sacrifice of animals and other rituals to promote fertility and ward off evil spirits. During the 5th century AD, the Christian church sought to replace the pagan celebrations with Christian holidays and began to associate the feast day of St. Valentine, a Christian martyr, with the pagan festival of Lupercalia. Over time, the celebration of St. Valentine's Day became associated with love and romance, and the holiday evolved into the modern celebration of love and affection. Stamping out evil practices by changing the day to be about Love sounds like something God would approve of. Christians are called to love others, and expressing love and affection for others is a central aspect of Christian teachings. Whether or not Valentine's Day has pagan origins, Christians can still view it as an opportunity to express love and gratitude toward the important people in their lives.

[@thunderous-one]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven utter garbage, every word of the “word salad” you have responded with. All you have done is use a desperate form of rationalisation to justify a clear demonic practice dressed up as “an expression of love that god would approve,” I mean, really? Since when between Abraham (circa 2000 BC) and John (97 AD) has God ever approved of practices that have been co-opted into the mosaic law or the law of Christ? Your the sort of person that would justify/accept and promote vile anti biology lifestyles because those contrary to nature relationships have/express “love”

[@thisissparta8884]

​@@CelticSpiritsCovenIt is traced back to Nimrod the same one who gave us easter and Christmas. He is also the beast of revelation. I would be very careful what I worship. The entire calendar is pagan.

[@dekutree64]

More detail on Chicxulub, please. Hard to reconcile with what else I know of the flood model. It would have to have happened after most of the deposit layers were in place, but would it create the concentric shock features if the sediment was all still wet, not hardened into rock? And how did enough debris get cleared out of the atmosphere for Noah to get off the ark within a year, especially if the 40 days and nights of rain had already happened at the beginning of the flood? The remaining high-altitude dust does help explain the ice age, though.

[@SK-bw2cv]

06:20 if these adults really cared about the children they would never suggest these things. Instead they'd rather promote political agendas to prove a point.

[@anttisalminen1110]

Gosh, you made a new whale of a finding, I cannot wait for the nextone, maybe dolphins, or something

[@astatine0085]

Yes. The medical dependency is about coin

[@mixi1141]

Is this some crazy humor show? That people looks like they mean it. Good actors! It seems so serious!🤓

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

Interbreeding shows kinds. Nice!

[@sgtjameslindsey2493]

This story reminds me of a story that I read about Ligers. A cross between Lions and Tigers, the largest cat on the planet, but is also able to produce offspring. I believe there were some produced who had cubs in Oklahoma in 2021. Thanks for sharing this brodcast. God bless.

[@CarlTuckersonn]

The Ligers are like Nephilim cats lol… same type of thing happened when the Watchers and human women mated, made giants/nephilim…. The Lions are like the Watcher and the female tiger is like a female woman…. When the genders are switched it creates a different hybrid the Tigon but isn’t a “giant”. All this miscegenation was one of the forbidden secrets these Watchers practiced and taught man during the times of Enoch.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

Hogle Zoo in Salt Lake City had a Liger many years ago.

[@IAMhassentyou]

The grass withers and the flowers fall, but the word of our God endures forever. Isaiah 40:8 As for God, his way is perfect: The Lord’s word is flawless; he shields all who take refuge in him. Psalm 18:30 Therefore everyone who hears these words of mine and puts them into practice is like a wise man who built his house on the rock. Matthew 7:24 Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away. Matthew 24:35

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@philhart4849 you don't have to do anything

[@PhilHart-j9y]

@@IAMhassentyouThen it pleases me to call out the Bible for the nonsense that it is.

[@IAMhassentyou]

@@PhilHart-j9y it pleases me to please God and serve Him and that is exactly what I am going to do until the day I die.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

It is a tautology. The definition of God is the being that is perfect. The word for a perfect being is God.

[@dianebankston4131]

What’s wrong with the adult parents, shameful.

[@TomasPböckerlyftningschack]

Surprising and interesting but no mystery. Apparently those two whales sometimes do interbreed, (same as the finches on Galapagos). I agree it means that the concept of species is not as simple as it is often presented in school books.

[@TearDownThisWall]

Yet more confirmation and proof of God's creation and design, not to mention the literal impossibility of the theory of evolution.

[@TearDownThisWall]

@@philhart4849 "observed routinely"😂Care to share one example? Just one...

[@PhilHart-j9y]

@@TearDownThisWall Covid-19 is routinely observed as evolving. Your "crickets" remark discredits you.

[@TearDownThisWall]

@@PhilHart-j9y So changing viruses is confirmation of the theory of evolution? Got it. 😂Your absurd ludicrous comment discredits you.

[@PhilHart-j9y]

@@TearDownThisWall I thank you for confirming that you are willfully ignorant about evolution. Your willful ignorance is emblematic of all god mobsters. And I thank you for the laughter that you have given me this day. 😀

[@TearDownThisWall]

@@PhilHart-j9y Despite claiming to defend science and evidence, it amazes me how often atheists draw conclusions without any supporting evidence whatsoever. In your case, you concluded I'm "willfully ignorant". First, what's your evidence that my supposed ignorance is "willful"? Second, what's your evidence that my differing opinion on the theory of evolution is the result of ignorance? It could very well be that I'm just as learned as you or more on the subject, but have a different opinion based on differing interpretations of the evidence. So, what's your evidence on your conclusions? Or don't you have any? And if you don't, it would be just as likely that your conclusions on the theory of evolution are also based on a lack of evidence.

[@loricalass4068]

Wow. I didn’t know about all the medical and emotional problems “transitioning” causes. While the medical establishment makes big bucks.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

And which _"transitioning"_ do you mean? Transitioning to atheism is liberating. And about other transitions, AIG knows nothing.

[@loricalass4068]

@@edgarmatzinger9742 your post is typical of people who support atheism and particularly evolution, which you no doubt believe. When you are presented with scientific data, you just evade even mentioning any of it. You don’t try to refute any of it. In fact, you say zero about science at all. That is the pattern I have seen over and over and over. I used to call myself an atheist. It wasn’t liberating. It was delusional. It was denial. I will be praying for you. Best I can do. Welcome to mute.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

@lass4068 _"I used to call myself an atheist. It wasn’t liberating. It was delusional. It was denial."_ Most people who call themselves an atheist and are now a christian, weren't atheists at all. But hey, you do you. AiG never presents any evidence. They can't as the evidence doesn't support their world view. And doesn't confirm their bias. _"Welcome to mute."_ Would be a wise thing to do: keep silent on things you know nothing about... Word of advice: evolution is fact. And the bible is *NOT* a history document. It's a set of stories. Nothing more, nothing less.

[@victoriaconger6363]

do you know about Dr. James Tour?

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

Are we living in the end times? No one knows when Jesus will return, but the rapture could occur at any moment. God will deal with sin either by grace or by wrath. John 3:36 says, “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on them.” Those who do not accept Jesus Christ as their savior will remain under the Lord’s wrath.

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@Quint-ib4nf after his 1000 year reign

[@marcocynicalis484]

There is no rapture,as Jesus comes in the clouds to conquer and destroy this evil world government system his people will be caught up to him as he descends and will rule with him a thousand years(the stone cut without hands that grows in to a mountain and fills the whole earth as taught in the book of Daniel).

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

@Quint-ib4nf it's in Revelation. You should check it out 🙂

[@Woopor]

Everyone has been thinking they’re living in the end times, being constantly on edge over the fact that the world could end any second is probably a key part of the indoctrination in some sects

[@idi8874]

​@Quint-ib4nf I think we are in the end times. And what we should concentrate on is making disciples and preaching the gospel. And, of course, preparing ourselves for Jesus returning.

[@phoebelim5040]

You repeatedly mention kids looking for attention. I expect that is some of it, but I think most kids (especially around puberty) feel disoriented with their bodies. I think a lot of the people that want to transition feel like if they can start again (in their case with a new gender or identity) all their problems will be fixed. Obviously that will not happen. I am really glad to see the pendulum swing back towards sanity and deny permanent and life altering therapies to young people who need help in other ways. And time heals a whole lot.

[@Flownthecoup23]

When it comes to the topic of Transgender, we must remember that because of the Fall, we all have a SIN nature and not everyone gets a choice on how that’s expressed. I myself transitioned later in life and let me just say, I wouldn’t wish this struggle on my worst enemy. It’s also a great evil to guide children into this. Let them be children. Later things can be sorted out. However, for those dealing with this dilemma let me say that Jesus took your sin penalty at the Cross as well. The Bible does say that God wants none to perish so He paid our sin debt with His blood. There are no exceptions. You must however go to Him and ask for that forgiveness. It’s not automatic 😊

[@bigbabatunde1218]

How did you know you were trans? You have only ever been yourself so who told you, or made you think you were the other gender? Why didn't you consider that you weren't stereotypical gender type or that you were struggling with anosognosia tinged body dysmorphia?

[@statutesofthelord]

Praying you have repented and have become who God made you again.

[@wingednut2283]

Or shake of the shackles of medieval faith. Just be who you are

[@bigbabatunde1218]

@@wingednut2283 People can be who they think they are without resorting to permanent surgery and endocrine system damage. Saw one on TV earlier tonight. Total bad joke. A "mental health condition' made manifest in the flash they were.

[@bigbabatunde1218]

77th brigade strikes again. 🙄

[@sherrylburgess4637]

Are any of your books, etc? Available in Australia? The postage between America and Australia is way more than the cost of your publications.

[@wingednut2283]

Dont do it Sherry, having faith is 100% okay but denying facts like these guys do is not okay.

[@mehallica666]

How else are they supposed to scam money out of believers?

[@australiasindustrialage689]

That sounded like Bodie, will the real Geogie Purdom please stand up!

[@the.imprint]

Sinkholes do too! They were made the same way you see bubbles in the sand at the beach

[@jessebryant9233]

66 million? So how much erosion would have occurred in that amount of time? ...

[@thomasmaughan4798]

"These Whales Officially CONFIRM the Biblical Flood" Did they confirm it in English?

[@dnisey64]

Thank you

[@gowdsake7103]

For what ! ignorance and lies

[@dnisey64]

@@gowdsake7103 your opinion. Sad you felt you had to comment on a strangers response, instead of making your own. Thank you and have a blessed day.

[@coolhawk2003]

​@@gowdsake7103going for the easy comments. Lol. Tell us how its lies..... go on

[@allenchang6185]

convergent evolution is very common, i dont see whats crazy about 2 unrelated fish that have similar features, esp in the simlar environment, bunch of different birds and incests and bats got similar feature but they are unrelated, which is ability to fly. It doesn't prove anything...

[@christtheonlyhope4578]

Thanks for sharing AIG. 🙏 We know that evilution can't possibly be true. It's just a matter of time and we can figure out the details on why.

[@burnttoast2790]

*We know that evilution can't possibly be true. It's just a matter of time and we can figure out the details on why.* A shame then that creationists overwhelmingly _accept_ evolution.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

How long do you need. You've been trying for 150 years.

[@idi8874]

​@@mattbrook-lee7732 wrong. Scientists try for almost 200 years to prove evolution, but fail miserably from some point of view. No one ever denied that natural selection exists, or that there can occur changes through speciation because of adaptation or isolation etc. The problem is that the well known evolutionists claim that simplicity forms complicity, inferiority forms superiority, life from nonlife, order from chaos, one animal kind into another etc. There , scientists fail completely to explain these questions from the evolutionary point of view. In fact, they are sure no God exists and some even said that although all evidence points to God, they cannot take that in calculus because he is not matter or something like that. How dumb. Since when do scientists exclusively ignore a point of view (or the explanation) that is older than 5000 years and try to explain it from another point of view and still fail for 200 years?

[@mehallica666]

You've had over 2,000 years to prove creation and 150 years to disprove evolution. What's the hold up?

[@Wayne--O]

Thing with evolutionist is that you need 150 million years. No big, but that span has to be 'Stable'. Stable atmosphere, Stable habitat, Stable food chain, Stable climate.. guess what, the earth doesn't show this stability in any fraction of that time frame. This is science, observable science. Not even going into absence of cataclysmic events and other variables. Time is the hero there, but you still would need numerous miracles for that extremely slow and drawn out process to have occurred. Also, the Bible does not give the age of the earth. Deducing a genealogical line is your doing and assumption. Conjecture and sounding a bit stupid putting words into something that isn't there.. isn't scriptural.

[@MarkSheeres]

It seems like the whale thing would be confirmation of “created kinds” so why did you call the video official confirmation of the flood, and not confirmation of created kinds?

[@mikeelder6298]

What gets me is the evolutionists say that life evolved out of the sea, but with the whale, it's like after they evolved for life on the land, they said, OH NO! THE HECK WITH THIS! I'm going to evolve back to the sea. The evolutionists seem to be unable to get their story straight.

[@sciencerules2825]

What's wrong with the scientific narrative? Tetrapods colonized the land roughly 400 MYA. Over the next several hundred million years they evolved into various groups including mammals. Around 55 MYA some of those mammalian species began living near the water and catching fish as part of their diet. Over the next 10-20 million years those species evolved to be semi-aquatic, then eventually fully aquatic to best survive in the new environment. That's what the fossil and genetic evidence shows.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

We have a very good fossil record of the evolution of the whale. We also have a lot of semi aquatic animals today (hippos, penguins, seals). Its really not that hard to see if you just stop seeing genesis as a literal explanation

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

​@@mattbrook-lee7732 I am going to walk you through a story to help you understand how evolutionists are just making it all up.... Let's say there was a fish (who we will call Fred), who's offspring would eventually "evolve" into a gecko. Fred wants to breed, so he finds a girlfriend fish named Susan. They have babies, but one of the babies seems to have a birth defect. We will call this baby Sam. Sam (amazingly even though he has a birth defect), is able to survive and meet a girlfriend who we will call Carol. They have babies, but one of their babies seems to have a birth defect that is a gecko. We will call him Dave. Dave must survive his birth defect and then his offspring will be geckos. In order to prove that one species changed into another species, you need something called an "interspecies". In order to prove an interspecies, you need the direct lineage of the particular specimen. In this case, you need the fossils of Fred and Susan, you need the fossils of Sam and Carol, you need the fossil of Dave, and you need the fossils of Dave's offspring. The problem with evolutionists is that they don't have the direct lineage of the individual specimen. You just have random fossils. How do you know who the parents were of these specific fossils? How do you know who the direct children of that fossil is? You don't. You just have a random fossil and then imagine that one species changed into another. You are looking a birth defects and imagining a story. You do not have direct lineage. There is no direct evidence for macro-evolution. It's just guesses from people don't want there to be a god.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven That's a great example of creationist understanding of "science". 😅😅🤣🤣😂😂

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@sciencerules2825 YT is doing something weird. I cannot see the comment that I made, that you replied to here. Now please show us the entire lineage of that individual fossil so we can clearly see how the birth defect's offspring eventually turned into another species. Like I said, if you don't have the lineage, then you are just looking at a birth defect and using your imagination. But you are attempting to claim otherwise, yet you present no evidence.

[@gump1005]

I came on here to look for the whales to explain/confirm the Flood not some gender hormone therapy session.

[@gowdsake7103]

Nothing can confirm something that never happened

[@gump1005]

@@gowdsake7103 So, you don't believe in the Bible or God? Interesting. At the Throne Judgment, you will find something that does confirm it.

[@troywest7045]

Most of America's Founding Fathers didn't believe in it either.​@@gump1005

[@rahowherox1177]

Comedy gold.

[@noneyabidness9644]

This is a bigger problem for evolution, but not for the reason that you pointed out. Because these whale "species" have never actually been separated by any degree of time or space, yet they are in some way modified from one another.

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

Where darwinism fails scripture speaks.

[@wingednut2283]

What is darwinism?

[@refuse2bdcvd324]

@@wingednut2283 type "define darwinism" in the search engine.

[@poliincredible770]

@@wingednut2283 look it up, it's an actual word with a real definition.

[@wingednut2283]

@williamcox4616 do you mean researcher/author? Not sure why you chose the word father.

[@wingednut2283]

@williamcox4616 cool i dont respect Michael jackson but his music is good. Judging someones work on them personally is weird.

[@rharris22222]

The old whalers would laugh at the biologists. Back in whaling days, those two "Species" were known as "Blue finners" and "Gray finners," i.e. two breeds of the same family line. It's not just that they were both large whales of similar shape. They are also similar temperament and toughness. Of course, being the biggest, the blue finners were the toughest of the tough. The old whalers avoided them in the days of wooden ships and hand-thrown harpoons.

[@brendahilburn1099]

😂 I was thinking the other day that evolution requires DNA mutations. I used to work at a children's hospital and remembered the genetic diseases I had seen that was a result of genetic mutations and chromosome anomalies.

[@hleigh7201]

Skipped basic biology class, eh?

[@idi8874]

​​@@razark9 😂😂😂 Funny what you assume. But let me ask you something... Who is the open minded here? Creationist who take everything into consideration and make logical conclusions after their observations OR Evolutionists who reject from the beginning the bible and the hypothesis that there is a creator? They even said: although everything points to a creator, it will not be taken into consideration. So, who's the open minded here? Evolutionists? 😂😂😂

[@samburns9350]

@@idi8874 _Who is the open minded here?_ Certainly not the creationists who reject 99% of the scientific evidence just because if goes against their literal Genesis narrative. That is the exact opposite of being open minded.

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@samburns9350 Evolutionists/atheists are the ones that say "it cannot be because of a god". They do not even consider the evidence for god. Sounds pretty close-minded to me. At least theists/creationists have considered the evidence and made an informed decision. What informed decision did you make about God? Did you sit through classes, as an adult, in university, learning about God? Or did you just accept "it cannot be because of a god" without even putting any thought into it?

[@samburns9350]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven No, they say "there is no evidence a God did it", and they are right.

[@WNYXeb777]

Wait a minute, you mean to tell me that they didn't decide grass and ground were better then being constantly wet so the crawled into land. Then after a time they changed their minds - gave up legs for fins and flollopped back into the sea???? Who'da thunk. I'm still waiting on the fossilized whale with legs and fins.

[@burnttoast2790]

So... does the sequence of fossils going from _Indohyus, Pakicetus,_ and _Ambulocetus_ to _Kutchicetus, Rodhocetus,_ and _Dorudon_ not mean anything to you?

[@WNYXeb777]

And this is your proof of Naturalistic Evolution? You're kidding right? I see different animals..... why is there never transition critters? After all for every 1 you listed Darwinian evolution states that thousands to millions of " in betweens " must have been. Yet none exist. So honestly I'll look deeper into what you state but in my regard I did study some on human biologic anthropology and found " most " variance to be incorrectly assembled bones, to down right fraud to Lucy who was a monkey. When people refuse truth they have nothing left but to manufacture lies. @@burnttoast2790

[@mrastin821]

@@WNYXeb777 You want a whale with legs? Durudon. It's a toothed whale that has tiny vesitgal rear limbs (with front limbs evolved into flippers as with modern whales). As to transitional fossils, we have thousands. Let me ask you a question. What do YOU think a transitional organism would look like? What characteristics do you think it would have to have for it to be convincing for you? Feel free to use examples, descriptions, a hypothetical, whatever helps you to explain. If you do that, then I think we'd have a good basis for a conversation.

[@WNYXeb777]

You have none and your argument is lame. Plz go research cell biology for a start. No life has every come from nonlife and no anything has ever turned into something other - reptiles don't turn into birds ect. Your concept of transition fossils is complete absurdity. Have you ever researched the supposed human evolutionary line - total crap - Monkeys/chimps/apes or human. Not one into another and between the frauds " piltdown man " and manipulated skeletons/ or impartial one there is no link.@@mrastin821

[@mrastin821]

@@WNYXeb777 I have several degrees in biology, so I'm very well aquainted with the material. I'm not using an argument from authority, merely that I have experience with this field. I asked YOU to define a term, so we could have a discussion, and you instead went off on a nonsequitur. 1. We have thousands of great examples. You hand waving and saying "nuh unh" is a childs argument. 2. Birds evolved from a branch of the dinosaur group, which evolved from reptiles. Archaeopteryx is a famous example of a transitional fossil; it has both bird and dinosaurian features, exactly as you'd expect a transitional organism to have. 3. Humans ARE apes, by biological definition. It is the group we belong to according to even Linnean taxonomy. 4. Yup, Piltdown was a fraud. You know figured that out? Physical anthropologists who were extremely suspicious of the fossil, and worked out how it had been made. Science self corrected, exactly as it should. You know who DIDN'T figure out the fraud? Priests. You can't hold up such events as proofs against science when it was science that found the proof. Now, you say we don't have transitional fossils. We do. So, what do YOU think a transitional fossil would have to be? What characteristics would it have to include in order for such evidence to be convincing for you? If you say "it can't", it just means you are not open to the idea on religious and ideological grounds as opposed to scientific ones. That's fine, but you should admit such instead of saying that science CAN'T demonstrate it. Its more that you don't want to hear it.

[@1VFA666]

Are we all agreed whale hybrids have nothing to do with a literal Noah's Flood?

[@SK-bw2cv]

Only you atheists agree on that. Lol 😆

[@juliegouker4946]

I will tell all of you that you live your life the way you want. We live our lives with our beliefs .

[@Faust2Dr]

Define 'kind' please.

[@marcusmuse4787]

Definition of “Kind”: The Hebrew word for “kind” is “min”, which signifies subdivisions within a larger group. In Genesis 1, God created plants and animals “according to their kinds.” The Bible’s plain reading suggests that plants and animals were designed to reproduce within the boundaries of their kind. If two things can breed together and produce offspring, they are considered members of the same created kind. Examples: Dogs, regardless of their specific breeds (wolves, dingoes, coyotes, or domestic dogs), can easily breed with each other. When dogs breed together, you still get dogs-thus, there is a “dog kind.” Similarly, chickens come in various breeds, but they all breed with each other, resulting in more chickens. Hence, there is a “chicken kind.” Misconceptions: People often confuse the term “species” with “kind.” However, “species” is a man-made classification system, and its definition can be challenging. The Bible consistently uses the term “kind,” emphasizing the idea that creatures were created to reproduce within their designated boundaries.

[@VintageTealDog]

Example of “kinds”, zebras and horses are the same kind, but scientists classify them as different species

[@sciencerules2825]

@@VintageTealDog That isn't a definition. What scientific tests can you use to determine what "kind" a species belongs to? Surely there must be some genetic signature is a "kind", right?

[@Cr1msonFir3]

A KIND is a singular type of animal. Multiple sub species/breeds can fit into a single kind such as different species of cats interbreeding, such as a lion and a tiger. Even when they do successfully breed to form a liger it's still a cat and no one denies that. Different types of canines are another example of multiple breeds under one Kind of animal type. Different dogs can breed together and have dogs. What this means for evolution is that species are completely incapable of making something that it isn't. A cat will never birth a dog or a fish.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@Cr1msonFir3 _A KIND is a singular type of animal._ By that definition all mammals are the same "kind". In fact all eukaryotes are the same "kind".

[@Leo-qw1dv]

How old is the whale species.😯

[@luish1498]

The first «whales« appeared 50 million years ago

[@alantasman8273]

Whale skeletons in a vertical positions have been found in coal seams around the globe. How did they get there is best explained by those whales being caught up in the Noahic Flood along with other sea creatures and then being deposited among the biomass that later became coal.

[@luish1498]

The fossil was not vertical. It was 40 to 50 degrees off horizontal, and the fossil was oriented parallel to the strata. In other words, the whale was horizontal when buried. The strata were later uplifted and folded into their present orientation.

[@markduell2468]

Noah's Flood is a copy of a copy.

[@alantasman8273]

@@luish1498 Thanks for confirming at least one whale was found in a coal seam...

[@RealHooksy]

There were no whales when coal was deposited

[@luish1498]

@alantasman8273 a fossil of a whale found in California that was alleged to have been buried and fossilized in a vertical position. As evidence for a global flood, some creationists and catastrophists have pointed to the strange tale of a fossil whale from California that was found buried "in a vertical position" and intersecting several rock layers. Investigation of the tale revealed that it was mostly false.

[@temporary4384]

Did they start talking ?

[@burntgod7165]

No they officially don't! Why does AiG lie?

[@gowdsake7103]

Because all they have is a myth and confirmation bias

[@nathanhale7444]

He said "evolution is always evolving with new data". I would add "and with new bandaids to patch up their haphazardly constructed theory and cover up anything that either points to the truth or contradicts their cult.

[@jgr7487]

The young earth interpretation of Genesis is less than 300 years old. Therefore, your faith is always evolving with new revelation.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

_"haphazardly constructed theory"_ Or how to write "I know nothing about evolution..."

[@SK-bw2cv]

God's word always proves true. So of course this is going to point to creation also. Jesus for the "W" again. 😉

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@razark9 so sorry but you are wrong. As always. The Bible is truth. Will always be truth. Is irrefutable. Your religion of atheism will get you nowhere in the end.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@razark9 atheists don't know reality when it comes to the things of God. You don't even believe there is a world beyond this one. I'm certainly not going to take "reality" lessons from you. 🥱 There is a God. He exists, He is real and is coming to judge the dead and the living.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@razark9 There is a God. He exists, He is real and is coming to judge the dead and the living. I don't take reality lessons from you guys because you don't even know what reality is. But you'll find out one day! Guaranteed.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@razark9 I'm showing a lot of patience with someone who acts like you. There you go. There is your display of God. Galatians 5:22,23. And I'm 100% certain. Speak for yourself.

[@SK-bw2cv]

@@razark9 how certain am I? Willing to bank my life on it.

[@96nissan]

Been wondering what happened to sea critters when rhe Flood occured

[@mrastin821]

If the flood had been real, all life on Earth would have ended (you need to realize the amount of energy involved in that much water, and the heat the flood as described would have resulted in). Even without the heat, the vast majority of marine life would have died (broken food webs, lack of photosynthesis due to cloud cover and water turbity, decreased oxygen concentrations as all that dead life decayed, etc etc).

[@gowdsake7103]

It did not so you do not have to worry

[@sonniepronounceds-au-ni9287]

​@@mrastin821 Dude, it only rained for 40 days. That's not enough to kill all the algae. You would be surprised what many microorganisms can survive. We have found microorganisms in extremely hot springs near volcanoes. We have found worms and other life at the bottom of the sea where there is no possible photosynthesis. We have found spores that survived being launched into the stratosphere and even space. You don't know half about what is possible.

[@geoffcrumblin9850]

Was this post scheduled for release on April fools day. 😂

[@cristiandumitrana6510]

Fallen people always let their fallen brain , to think and do whatever they want ..... That's why redeem people have the guide the TESTAMENT OF THE CREATOR LORD GOD NAMED BIBLE WHERE IT TEACH THAT ..".TO DON'T THINK MORE THAN IS WRITTEN " 1 CORINTHIANS 4:6 With all respect for TRUTH AND KNOWLEDGE

[@Emanuel_carey]

This is worse than the veggietales. This is a 33 minute video of textbook bad faith argument. And ohhhh thee irony of bad faith, is not lost.

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@Woopor That's exactly what zealot cult members say about people not in their cult. Why are you a zealot?

[@wingednut2283]

​@@CelticSpiritsCoven you might want to read the definition of a cult and stare into a mirror

[@hozn]

They made some whaley good points that blow some evo claims out of the water

[@HereIam-rg3vy]

This is a total nonsensical presentation 😂😂😂

[@justaregularguy115]

How so?

[@TickedOffPriest]

People let in a little sin and then are shocked when the flood gates are opened.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

Noah's flood never happened. Period.

[@TickedOffPriest]

@@edgarmatzinger9742 That is both off topic and wrong.

[@edgarmatzinger9742]

@@TickedOffPriest Off topic maybe. But wrong? Nope. You seem to believe a dumb story.

[@samburns9350]

The scientific illiteracy of these people is staggering. When one ancestral species diverges into two there isn't a hard and fast barrier when one day the two can produce offspring and the next day they can't. What happens as the species diverge genetically we get a time where offspring have a 99% chance of being interfertile, then later 98%, then later 97%, etc. That continues until the two species can no longer interbreed. How long this takes is not dependent on *years* since the split but on things like effective population size and more importantly *time per generation.* For example, horses and zebras last shared a common ancestor between 4-5 MYA. Horses and zebras have a time per generation of 12 years so we're looking at roughly 400,000 generations yet they can still produce offspring. Blue whales and Fin whales last shared a common ancestor between 8-9 MYA. Their generation times are much longer than equines however, 30 years for a Blue whale and 25 year for a Fin whale. That means they've had roughly 320,000 generation since the split *which is much less that equines.* So why are these guys so amazed that Blue whales and Fin whales can still produce offspring?

[@idi8874]

Bruh , you are talking about speciation. No one ever denied that this happens and that species change through isolation and adaptation. What is scientifically incorrect is the "fact" that all kinds of organisms evolved from LUCA. Also, what isn't proven and evolutionists claim it indirectly are these: something comes from nothing, complexity from simplicity, life from nonlife, information from non information, order from chaos etc.

[@bigbabatunde1218]

Here's public record comments from one of your side..... *"The absence of fossil evidence for intermediary stages between major transitions in organic design, indeed our inability, even in our imagination, to construct functional intermediates in many cases, has been a persistent and nagging problem for gradualistic accounts of evolution."* Stephen J Gould. Did he say that? Yes or no? *"A major problem in proving the theory has been the fossil record, the imprints of vanished species preserved in the Earth's geological formations. This record has never revealed traces of Darwin's hypothetical intermediate variants. Instead species appear and disappear abruptly, and this anomaly has fueled the creationist argument that each species was created by God."* Stephen J Gould. Did he say that? Yes or no? What about...... *"Well represented species are usually stable throughout their temporal range, or alter so little and in such superficial ways (usually in size alone), that an extrapolation of observed change into longer periods of geological time could not possibly yield the extensive modifications that mark general pathways of evolution in larger groups.* *Most of the time, when the evidence is best, nothing much happens to most species."* Stephen J Gould. Did he say that? Again, yes or no? *"Anything that we dig up that is supposedly more than 250,000 years old should have absolutely no radiocarbon in it whatsoever. But instead, we find it in everything that we dig up, even dinosaur bones. This is clear evidence that the “millions of years” theory is simply a bunch of nonsense”.* Stephen J Gould. Again, you know the drill, Did he say that? Confirmation of yes condemns your brown shirt atheist foundation agenda. Denial condemns your brown shirt atheist foundation agenda. Fed up of having to teach you lot about what your side has said in books, talks and interviews. Talk about being willfully ignorant of science. Atheists win Gold in the dishonesty Olympics every time.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@bigbabatunde1218 More of the same creationist quote-mining you're already been corrected on? Thanks for showing yet again how intellectual honesty is an alien concept to creationists.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@bigbabatunde1218 Your last quote is not from Gould. You have been corrected on this several times already. Now you're simply lying for the sake of lying.

[@idi8874]

​@annieoaktree6774 yes it does. Don't blame me if you don't see it. It's a classical speciation described, but ok.

[@shawnpa]

That was wise discussion on the-trans issue. Trendiness is huuuge to children.They need help dealing with this hyped up trendy solutions to emotional issues. Parenting, gender role models, and counseling to get at the root issues are needed. 🙏

[@APR4U]

I always appreciate the subject matter, but wish you all would learn how to do it more professionally instead of jamming on and on like I don’t know what like unprofessionally. Much love keep working on it folks. Love you all.

[@faithfulwarrior7]

Lol, Christians aren't in competition with the entertainment you watch from the world.

[@arboristartist-treeevan8910]

Have you considered that they are being professional at like, I don't know what, like "what THEY DO just like THEY DO IT"?

[@carmenwiker2016]

Ok, well I’m pretty sure I’m not going to convince you otherwise but if what you are saying is that one species can become another species I do not believe we have any evidence of that. I do believe we see adaptation within species that has been programmed into the DNA. Thank you for your reply, I appreciate it.

[@sciencerules2825]

What evidence would it take to convince you one species can evolve into another similar species? Because we have a ton of fossil and genetic evidence for such speciation as well as documented cases of observed speciation. 🙂

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@sciencerules2825 None of that proves that a species turned into another species. It's just speculation from people who don't want God to be real. It's an excuse.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven Heh. You don't even know what the evidence is but you're already sure it is wrong. That big red nose sure fits you.

[@idi8874]

​@@CelticSpiritsCoven you mean kind. No animal kind cannot turn into another kind. A species can become two different species because of adaptation, geographical isolation etc. But this is called speciation. What I mean, for example Darwin's Finches are one great example of allopatric speciation. Because the initial individuals couldnt fly over the sea from one island to another, the population were isolated, and so there were formed subspecies of the same species . But that's speciation. Not evolution as how they say. God created animals and plants after each kind, so the cat kind, the dog kind, horse kind. No problem with that. In time, (after the flood ) there could be mutations, isolation, adaptation etc which bring different species or subspecies. For example, saying that the dog evolved from a wolf (through adaptation and mutations, and , well, natural selection, meiosis) it's ok to say it, because they are of the same kind. But saying that a dinosaur, a reptile evolved into an avian animal namely birds, there is the impossibility. See the differences? Evolutionists tend to confuse speciation with their theories (which includes also what Darwin and others claimed, that complexity comes from simplicity, order from chaos, information from non information, life from nonlife etc). Here's the problem. No scientist (even Christians) denies that there are changes within species and populations. The problem we have is, well, what I said before and which all processes in living organisms contradict. Hope this helps. Be blessed.

[@idi8874]

​@@sciencerules2825no Christian has ever denied speciation. Don't confuse it with the theories Margulis, Haeckel, Lamark, Darwin etc claimed to be true.

[@johncipolletti5611]

Whales were land animals many moons ago. They then went back into the sea. This proves EVOLUTION!

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

Who saw whales being land animals?

[@sciencerules2825]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven Millions of professional scientists have seen the huge amount of evidence cetaceans (and other marine mammals like manatees and seals) evolved from land animals.

[@idi8874]

Well yeah? Every teacher showed me and other biology students only the diagram with Darwin finches (which is a classical example of allopatric speciation). Never has anyone ever shown a diagram of an ancestral land animal becoming a whale. Even when I looked up on the internet.

[@bigbabatunde1218]

So you were told. Here's something you missed.... *"No fossil is buried with its birth certificate. That, and the scarcity of fossils, means that it is effectively impossible to link fossils into chains of cause and effect in any valid way....to take a line of fossils and claim that they represent a lineage is not a scientific hypothesis that can be tested, but an assertion that carries the same validity as a bedtime story, amusing perhaps, even instructive, but not scientific."* Dr Henry Gee 'Evolutionist' and Senior Editor at Nature.

[@bigbabatunde1218]

​@annieoaktree6774Paid for artists impressions are not evidence.

[@polymorpheus9745]

In the first story you indicated how separate species interbreeding may cause mules, but when speaking of transgender surgery you failed to indicate how the process is making mules of our children through sterilization. As with so many in media, you missed this critical point.

[@Bearthalamass]

The theory of evolution proves itself. Just look how much the evolutionary time scale has evolved in the last hundred years...😂

[@wingednut2283]

Almost like science is a consensus amongst the masses of experts.

[@Bearthalamass]

@wingednut2283 Experts.....if that's what you want to call them. Fun fact: Charles Darwins grandfather/2nd cousin Erasmus Darwin is actually the first guy to publish a book about evolution called zoonomia where he hinted at yt ppl being more evolved, and Africa being the birthplace of mankind because that's where the most primates are. Real scientific huh? Charles Darwins son/2nd cousin leanard Darwin, that Charles called slow and backwards as a child, grew up to help found the eugenics movement, and is on record advocating for surgically sterilizing minorities, blind and deaf ppl, ppl with disabilities and even poor ppl to cleanse the gene pool. Is that the kind of expertise your referring to?

[@Kathie-np8ge]

This is what happens when you don’t bring up your child in the way the Bible says

[@blblbl115]

This is all nice and dandy. I applaud the efforts. But I must say something. You cannot use "science" (the very thing people USE to *try* to disprove God's existence) against the very people who do just that. Atheistic people won't accept these findings, NOR will they even listen to them. They will not listen to these things because they have ZERO faith. This is NOT a matter of "They CAN'T believe," this is a matter of "They REFUSE to believe." Regardless of facts and proof. (Oh well... their choice.) Fighting fire with fire is pointless. You CANNOT beat the Devil at his own game. Instead, continue speaking about the prophecies that the Bible speaks of, that are coming true in this day and time. That is the only "un-deniable proof." It is said in the Bible... "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse." - Romans 1:20 This verse means that God has given everybody ENOUGH proof of his existence. So that when they stand before him at "Judgement..." They will be *"without excuse"* for not believing in him or Jesus. They will not be able to say: "I'm sorry, I didn't hear about you (God/Jesus)." "I never heard about The Word." "There wasn't enough proof." God will NOT listen to statements like that during Judgement.

[@keylanoslokj1806]

Western protestants are obsessed with science and other secular/logical proofs

[@georg7120]

Why do they confirm a flood, they are living in the water?

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

In what sense does any of the whale story confirm a biblical flood? Flat lie right there in the title

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

Predicted evolutionary timescale. Keep up.

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@CelticSpiritsCoven that doesn't even begin to answer my question. How does 2 whales getting it on confirm a biblical flood? What is the connection?

[@mattbrook-lee7732]

@CelticSpiritsCoven my question has nothing to do with evolution or any timescale. It's quite sweet that you think it's me that isn't keeping up though

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@@mattbrook-lee7732 Awwwww, thank you sweetheart! 💋 Just missed you for Valentines day.

[@teks-kj1nj]

@@CelticSpiritsCoven Where does evolution theory say after a specific number of years 2 divergent animals can no longer breed? Hint - it doesn't, there is no 'set' time period that this must happen in. It depends on many factors such as rate of mutations, rate of change from selection pressure, etc, etc....

[@angielovesusa]

All whales are one Species. They can be different Breeds, but they are still the same species.

[@sciencerules2825]

This place is famous for its silly click-bait non sequitur titles but how in the world does hybridization of two whale species confirm a global Noah's Flood??

[@joinjen3854]

Geologic rocks confirm massive flooding. Science confirms. Astronomy has signs of intelligent design. Catch up. You may be wrapped up in your belief system that you unable to see the obvious.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@joinjen3854 This video claims whale hybrids confirms a literal Noah's Flood. Please explain the reasoning behind the claim.

[@joinjen3854]

@sciencerules2825 watch the video, and LISTEN.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@joinjen3854 I did. There is no evidence or reason given that whale hybrids evidence a literal Noah's Flood. If you think differently then *please provide that reason here.*

[@marcj3682]

@@sciencerules2825 "a literal Noah's Flood" There's evidence all around you for a flood.

[@surrenderdaily333]

I love all of this hysterical evidence the evolutionists have!

[@RealHooksy]

No they don’t 😂

[@ulrichhartmann4585]

Two species interbreeding is quite common and neither new nor a problem to science. The distinction between "species" and "created kind" is only possible in the English language and neither scientific nor biblical.

[@sciencerules2825]

"Species" is a human construct to catalog the observed natural world. Since biological life is analog and species are observed to evolve it is both known and expected there will be gray areas at the species' boundaries. "Kind" on the other hand is supposed to be a Divinely Created category with very sharp distinct boundaries which can never be crossed. That's why creationists have such a hard time trying to decide what "kind' a transitional species is.

[@bigbabatunde1218]

​@@sciencerules2825'Kind' existed before the term "Species'. Species isn't even accurate as can be seen when the scientific community fabricated a 'new species' regarding the peppered Moth. The light and dark moths are still the same species, but not according to 'evolutionists' desperate for a win at any cost. 'Moths', as a kind of creature, is both informal and more accurate a term that everyone understands.

[@sciencerules2825]

@@bigbabatunde1218 "Kind' isn't a scientific term. In science words have very specific definitions because describing and communicating scientific knowledge requires precision. Wishy washy layman's terms like "kind" are not included in technical science discussion for a darn good reason, one you obviously don't understand. BTW the _carbonaria_ example of the peppered moth wasn't designated a new species. It's one of the three _forms_ of the moth. (dark, light, and intermediate)

[@sciencerules2825]

@@bigbabatunde1218 Then why do creationist fools keep insisting we use it as a science textbook?

[@bigbabatunde1218]

@@sciencerules2825 It's you lot that want the Bible to be a science textbook for some reason. Here's what gets said about the peppered moth.... There are several melanic and non melanic morphs of the peppered moth. These are controlled genetically. A particular colour morph can be indicated in a standard way by following the species name in the form "morpha morph name". The use of "form" in the method of Biston betularia f. formname in detailing these variations is also a widespread practice. These forms are often accidentally elevated to subspecies status when they appear in literature. Not adding the "f." (forma) or morpha implies that the taxon is a subspecies instead of a form, as in Biston betularia carbonaria instead of Biston betularia f. carbonaria. Rarely, forms have been elevated to species status, as in Biston carbonaria. Either of these two circumstances might lead to the erroneous belief that speciation was involved in the observed evolution of the peppered moth. This is not the case as individuals of each morph interbreed and produce fertile offspring with individuals of all other morphs; hence there is only one peppered moth species. By contrast, different subspecies of the same species can theoretically interbreed with one another and will produce fully fertile and healthy offspring, but in practice do not, as they live in different regions or reproduce in different seasons. Full-fledged species are either unable to produce fertile and healthy offspring, or do not recognize each other's courtship signals, or both. Breeding experiments have shown that in Biston betularia betularia, the allele for melanism producing morpha carbonaria is controlled by a single locus. The melanic allele is dominant to the non melanic allele. This situation is, however, somewhat complicated by the presence of three other alleles that produce indistinguishable morphs of morpha medionigra. These are of intermediate dominance, but this is not complete (Majerus, 1998). On the continent there are three morphs. The white morph typica (syn. morpha f. betularia), the dark melanistic morph carbonaria (syn. doubledayaria), and an intermediate form medionigra. In the UK, the typical white morph is known as typica, the melanic morph is carbonaria, and the intermediate phenotype is named insularia. In North America, the melanic black morph is morpha swettaria. In Biston betularia cognataria, the melanic allele (producing morpha swettaria) is similarly dominant to the non melanic allele. There are also some intermediate morphs. In Japan, no melanic morphs have been recorded as they are all morpha typica. So there you have it. Is the darker and lighter moths different species or not? How many differences are needed to be an 'evolutionary' jump despite not being anything to do with how 'evolution' is taught? Suppose it depends on how biased and militant the 'evolutionist' you have the misfortune to be talking to is.

[@samburns9350]

Question for the creationists: Forget about human for a minute, consider the rest of the great apes. Are chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and orangutangs the same "kind"? Yes or no, and how did you tell?

[@jayyrod1]

I'll give you my opinion but first I must say that I don't consider man as one of the ''great apes', as your preface would imply, however the reasoning would also work with humans. Here is my reasoning and I am sorry that it doesn't answer your question directly... Can those types of apes interbreed? If so, then they are the same kind. If not, then they are not the same kind. You can breed lion and tiger - so they are the same kind. You can breed servals with caracals so also the same kind. You can not breed a lion with a serval - so they are different kinds. Same with tigers and caracals - different kinds. When research is done on the apes we will know better u til then, that is how I look it. Hope this helps.

[@idi8874]

​@@jayyrod1very well explained.

[@austindailey8746]

Whale, whale, whale! Lol I bet Bodie wanted this one! 🤣

[@jockyoung4491]

Of course closely related species can interbreed. It happens all the time. It's because they are closely related. Duh. Just as evolution predicts

[@Cartoonicus]

Do you think the Chicxulub impact could have been enough to break open the Great Atlantic Ridge, thus starting the flood?

[@gregcollins3404]

So instead of using the term "atheist" we should start using the term "Theisphobic"

[@truthgiver8286]

Comedy Central the only thing missing was their red noses and makeup.

[@stevekooyers6920]

trust science, trust the government, swallow everything that they tell us. trust me, i'm a doctor

[@Slow810]

Whales breed with Whales and produce Whales......Thats a Whale of a Tail

[@jamesanderson1135]

Does the presence of useless legs and feet in Whale skeletons prove intelligent design?

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

Those "worthless legs and feet" are fins and are used for navigation. So they are not worthless at all.

[@CelticSpiritsCoven]

@annieoaktree6774 It is important to note that the expression of the Tbx4 gene alone is not sufficient for hindlimb development. Other genes and signaling pathways, such as the Sonic hedgehog pathway (SHH), are also involved in hindlimb development and are necessary for the proper formation of the hindlimb. Chemicals cannot evaluate whether a certain trait in the overall physiology of an organism will be able to survive. Do chemicals in test tubes talk to you? I've never heard them tell a species how to survive. Did you hallucinate that they did? You believe in magical thinking chemicals! Rocks having dreams! Imagine that....

[@bigbabatunde1218]

​@annieoaktree6774You were told that by 'evolutionists' who got paid to have careers as 'evolutionists'. It's the same for snakes and their embryonic state. Pro 'evolutionists' said they had remnants of legs. Later turned out to have been more lies as what 'evolutionists' were looking at and telling lies about was the snake's external genitalia before being fully formed. Look at what 'evolutionary' biologist Richard Lewontin said about himself and his peers.

[@gregcollins3404]

We are to be good stewards of the animal? How does that square with eating them?

[@majesticmalfeasance]

A 7 mile wide rock hit the earth and made a crater. Where's the rock?

[@luish1498]

crater chicxulub is an impact crater buried underneath the Yucatán Peninsula in Mexico.

[@richardgregory3684]

Vapourised for the most part. The impact was about 100,000,000 megatonnes - roughly 5000 times the power of all the nuclear bombs in the world going off at the same time.

[@jimmiewomble416]

Absolutely hilarious!

[@coolhawk2003]

I love how many people dont believe in God but watch this. Love you people. Great to see you watching. Love to hate but if you love it do you really hate it?

[@michaelthompson7217]

i love it. this channel probably creates and reinforces more disbelief than anyone could hope for.

[@michaelthompson7217]

AiG is the tip of the killing spear driving into the heart of religious fundamentalism in the US

[@billbrenne5475]

Very weak argument. Doesnt prove Genesis.

[@juliegouker4946]

Doesn't prove evolution.

[@billbrenne5475]

@@juliegouker4946 I fought evolution for some time, because I had a picture of it as being empty of meaning and purpose, which I saw as contributing to rampant agnosticism among philosophers and scientists, and this really repelled me. I think it helped first to read Catholic theologian and scholar Hans Kung's 700-page book, "Does God Exist?", which finally drilled it into my head that God works by way of Natural Law--violation of one means violation of the other. And my dad--ironically himself an agnostic's agnostic--stopped me in my tracks when I was on about the lack of meaning involved in the millions and billions of years over which evolution operated, saying, "Why does it matter?". From that point on, I embraced the picture of God having the right and reason to work things out as He saw and sees fit. I dont want to be another Job. Finally, I latched onto Tolkien's book, "The Silmarillion", the beginning of which is quite beautiful. It's one of the very few books that I've read more than once (along with The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and Stephen Baxter's book, "Coalescent", about a human hive along the lines of Star Trek's Borg, but more primitive and basic. I've been motivated all along by something that Christian apologist, Josh McDowell, wrote in the preface of his 1992 book, "Evidence That Demands a Verdict", in which he said, "My heart cannot rejoice in what my mind rejects as false". I was bound and determined to keep God no matter the cost, while not buying into things that dont make sense. What I see is that the world and universe is a Tapestry that unfolds moment-by-moment at the Hand of God, meaning that if I want to be close to God, I must be real in my words and actions--i.e., stop lying to myself and others, which is a full-time job, not allowing any time at all to even think about another life. This is the only meaning in life that I know, or that anyone else really knows. So i keep God and evolution, both, without contradiction or inconsistency. Why not?

[@stacy6994]

Mules can breed seldomly

[@Gator-fromOZ]

I’m so thrilled I’ll hardly be able to sleep tonight 😏…