Get 50% Off Your Kuku FM Subscription: kukufm.com/hindi?lang=hn&referrer=singular_click_id%3Dc7733a1a-16d6-4eda-8b87-8ef935f88c60& Coupon code - SSS50 (Valid for first 250 users)
@FahadAli-473 Жыл бұрын
@shortly nhi jo bhi ho nehru ne kiya hai
@kaushik-cy6vo Жыл бұрын
Video on shraddha and Nidhi? 35 pieces ?!/love jihad?
@kaushik-cy6vo Жыл бұрын
Video on shraddha and Nidhi? 35 pieces ?!/love jihad?
@FahadAli-473 Жыл бұрын
@@kaushik-cy6vo bhai aap se ek shawal hai jawab doge kya btato
@nutriLifevlogs Жыл бұрын
10:41 s mei GANDHIJI HOGA 🤬Netaji nahi I love 💕 নেতাজি সুভাষচন্দ্র বসু
@shivateja6849 Жыл бұрын
I don't know how Nehruji was close to children but one person that I know who was very close to children was Dr. APJ Kalam sir. If any children's day exists it should be on his birthday.
@GoofyAhhLion2937 Жыл бұрын
right
@siriog Жыл бұрын
There is already students day for him
@aedits581 Жыл бұрын
@@siriog I think teacher's day is celebrated on the birth anniversary of sarvapalli radhakrishnan
@siyamali5978 Жыл бұрын
Reading day is celebrated for Dr APJ Abdul Kalam
@devilback8871 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@pranaypriya5354 Жыл бұрын
Dhruv rathee and sham sharma Divided by opinions united by kuku FM😂
@roktimjojo5573 Жыл бұрын
Are bhai bhai 😆
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi Жыл бұрын
Sab Saale KuKu FM ko promote kar raha. Mohak and Think School bhi. Inko KUKU FM bula ke debate karwaye 🤣
@harshsingh-aug26 Жыл бұрын
@@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi sahi me 🙃😃
@infinityhumane21 Жыл бұрын
@@roktimjojo5573 are behan h
@namu4380 Жыл бұрын
You ate 🔥😂
@GaneshIngale. Жыл бұрын
Children's Day should on birthday of Dr.APJ Abdul kalam ❤😊
@adharmicindian491 Жыл бұрын
I am an ICSE student & I absolutely love Geopolitics- all because of people like S.Jaishankar, Abhijit Chavda & Sham Sharma Show...
@mohakroy821 Жыл бұрын
Matlab whatsapp chap gyan ki vajah se
@simbaa-lb2ju Жыл бұрын
Icse se hone ka koi relation nhi h isse tu bss shorts jyada dekh rha h inki
@shivakumarmathapati1259 Жыл бұрын
@@mohakroy821 nahi maa paa marne ki bad usko kane walo tum jaisi logo se😂
@shubhamsingh1539 Жыл бұрын
You should also check out world affairs
@HamaraPahad Жыл бұрын
*World Affairs* bhi ckeck kro...
@prateekmantri1728 Жыл бұрын
An eye opener for andhbhakts of Nehru Ji. One of the good intentions that you missed about Chacha Nehru is his interview to Play Boy.
@_avane Жыл бұрын
one side narrative
@omkarsakpal130 Жыл бұрын
@@_avane one side narrative is what we all were reading and listening for past 70 years . Now, whatever is coming out is the other side of that narrative.
@ashwinidesai4051 Жыл бұрын
@@_avane Aisa kya Nehru andhbhakt?
@protograde2723 Жыл бұрын
For the first time, a person is using the Andhbhakt word in a different way. God bless you sir...
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@omkarsakpal130 Lie harder, British bootlicking Sanghis will never get any credit for independence or for making of India.
Such a gentle way of saying the truth. One thing need to be changed. Nehru's intention was ANTI-HINDU and politicians say but they don't keep words because their intentions are not what they say. Nehru's intention internally and his execution of Anti-Hindu agenda was always there.
@ericgrey28843 ай бұрын
Tumko kaise pata ye, nehru ne sapne Mai aake bataya ye tumhe?
@amarkantkumar42333 ай бұрын
@@ericgrey2884 Tu kya sapne mein rehta hai. Nehru ki books speech uski policies nahi padhi?
@piyushkasariya7064 Жыл бұрын
Hello, just a correction Nehru was not elected, he was selected as PM of India by MK Gandhi, cabinet wanted to appoint Sardar Patel however Gandhi said we need a Harvard graduate that can deal with british
@nishitdas6499 Жыл бұрын
Nehru got the seat by cheating Sardar Patel...!!
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@venkatganapathy3123 Жыл бұрын
@@harisbhai20 your views are exactly what's being taught in the name of Indian history in our schools..😂😂
@manjurao9223 Жыл бұрын
Harvard graduate my foot! Mohandas and Nehru are nothing but British agents
@himanshupathak131011 ай бұрын
@@venkatganapathy3123Absolutely correct.😂
@vihaan2279 Жыл бұрын
Beti - KGB agent Khud - British Agent Lekin papa (motilal) freedom fighter! Waah kya logic hai!
@DhruvPatel-zg1zs Жыл бұрын
In December 1922, Chittaranjan Das, Narasimha Chintaman Kelkar and Motilal Nehru formed the Congress-Khilafat Swarajaya Party with Das as the president and Nehru as one of the secretaries. Other prominent leaders included Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy and Subhas Chandra Bose of Bengal, Vithalbhai Patel and other Congress leaders who were becoming dissatisfied with the Congress. The other group was the 'No-Changers', who had accepted Gandhi's decision to withdraw the movement.
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@aditijha813011 ай бұрын
@@harisbhai20 as u said… this clearly shows that he had no confidence in the people of this country but the brits and other Europeans…. or american
@IND4LIFE Жыл бұрын
If Lakshwadeep is Indian territory today It's just because of Sardar Patel ji
@lalitbhatisuper100 Жыл бұрын
Whole india is because of patel ji
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@lalitbhatisuper100 nonsense. Patel never wanted Junagadh and Kashmir to be part of India. Nehru and Gandhi worked for that.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
But BJP and RSS Sanghis have no role in expanding India. They are only known for reducing Indian territory and making India more unsafe.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@Warrior Bhai lame comeback of a sanghi
@cheeseman7493 Жыл бұрын
@@UJ00UJ seeing that old ghost mw2 on your profile pic, I would say, grow up and man up bro.
@raginipawanchaudah1824 Жыл бұрын
Best Example of NEPOTISM Nehru Indra Gandhi Rajiv Gandhi Soniya Gandhi Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi
@rmrrao2675 Жыл бұрын
You left out Gen. Kaulitz, vijayalakshmi pandit. Others can add more.
@pratyaksh979 Жыл бұрын
Amit Shah then Amit Shah ka beta in BCCI
@rmrrao2675 Жыл бұрын
@@pratyaksh979 amit shah beta becomes next prime Minister?
@mazterYT Жыл бұрын
@@pratyaksh979 how can you explain?
@garry951 Жыл бұрын
@@pratyaksh979 jali nh🤣🤣
@harshitvasavada201 Жыл бұрын
Sham Your hardwork will help Hindustan Jai O🚩
@akinapallysaikumar1419 Жыл бұрын
Lost half kashmir Lost half Ladakh in his terms Declared himself as Bharat Ratna
@akinapallysaikumar1419 Жыл бұрын
@reetu6836 so don't you think knocking the doors of UN on kashmir issue is a stupid thing, our army is capable of taking it back and asked for time. Why Nehru wanted UN intervention?
@akinapallysaikumar1419 Жыл бұрын
@reetu6836 I am talking about sovereignty of nation and you are labelling me to bjp. This is the problem with today's people who don't vote for bjp. If some one is taking pride on their culture and civilization, people starting labelling them as bjp ka banda and bhakth. May be this is the reason for bjp's success. If it is Muslim majority, then we should handover it to Pakistan? Aap ke logic ke hisab se Bharat ek civilizational centric country banana chahiye kya Aantankwaadi ko Kuch din mai tho Mita nahi sakte I am from telangana who voted for congress for the first time in 2018 just because they are responsible for the formation of state. It doesn't mean that I am andbhakth of congress and I will criticize them and I will not vote for congress in upcoming elections because there is lack of unity wich I clearly saw in recent bi elections
@boatpr0587 Жыл бұрын
We lost half of the kashmir, agree! But did you guys noticed everyone forgot about people of kashmir that includes kashmiri pandits and muslims. No big step been taken yet for there development, no govt. Ever helped them. If think, raja hari singh was the best ruler for kashmir because after him people of kashmir never been in peace. EVERY POLITICAL PARTY whether india or pak play same kashmir cars to gain votes, but no solution to the problem- the welfare of kashmiri people. People of kashmir now have 2 different opinions half want kashmir with india and half with pak. We should focus on what's next, not what blunder nehru did, he had a lot to do, bcuz india was broken that time Jai hind
@studer3500 Жыл бұрын
@@akinapallysaikumar1419 very well stated. congress PMs have been totally useless and sold out India. At least we now have a PM whom has the balls to walk with world leaders not behind them as was the case with that Jagmohan Singh
@optionseller143 Жыл бұрын
Apne dadaji se bolte yahi chizz ki kyu nhi gye ladni uss tym pura Kashmir hamara hota dadaji 2 tamacha mar kar bhaga dege
@bladey_0_10 Жыл бұрын
You forgot to mention Nehru giving away Coco Island and other regions to Myanmar, refusing the accession request of Balochistan and also the Port of Gwadar, and refusing the merging of Nepal as an Indian state.
@lalitpal4336 Жыл бұрын
Kaha se padhe ho??? This is all fake from watsapp university.
@businesssuccess184 Жыл бұрын
@@lalitpal4336 he studied at night from your mom
@lalitpal4336 Жыл бұрын
@@businesssuccess184 bilkul savarkar ke bhakt lag rhe.... 😆 🤣 kattar hindu saale ek mantra bhi yaad he sanskrit me... kitne number ate the school me chutiye
@cyanidepills1262 Жыл бұрын
@@businesssuccess184 why do I only see Hindus use abuse language that too on someone's mother is this written in your religious books?
@Saijwalith Жыл бұрын
true and later myanmar rented the same island to china and china is using it to spy on india
@KunalSwami Жыл бұрын
10:37 "Netaji aur Subhash Chandra Bose ke beech me jo differences thi" 😂
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@JhalakPaliwal Жыл бұрын
Thank you for saying the truth so bluntly 🧡👏
@cheeku1621 Жыл бұрын
Abe tere ko chutiya bana raha he.Sach jaana he naa toh book padhle
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@South_Asian.Fascist-98 Жыл бұрын
Nehru has always been HeRo? The Guy who is *big hearted* that he gifted POK to Pakistan, Coco Island to Myanmar and Aksai Chin to China is truly our National Hero! (Like his own property!) The Guy who strictly committed to *secularism* such that He allowed the Sufi Imam to make the Mosque but warned Rajendra Prasad to not attend Somnath Temple innaguration is really true Secular guy The guy who gave up the Permanent Seat of UN to China is *really Big Hearted?* (Today, We would have been more powerful due to that Veto Power) Our Books show His Contribution in our Independence, I respect that! But Books must not be afraid to talk about the other Facts of our so called National Heroes like Gandhi, Nehru, etc. I believe there is only one guy who had kept our Motherland United is Subash Chandra Bose! His absence during the Independence really hurts! 😔
@sadhiquet5495 Жыл бұрын
I accept that SCB is hero of our nation but why you hate Gandhi atleast he is a man who sacrificed entire life to get freedom for us
@biswajitmajumder9922 Жыл бұрын
@@sadhiquet5495 brother we think he try to United us but mk Gandhi, jawaharlal nehru, Mohammad Ali Jinnah are in the plan with British to divide the country In name of religion. For your kind information it was found that he was a sergant in the British Africa where he came to India to stop the national movement. Congress was also formed due to this purpose
@saatejnarapuram8047 Жыл бұрын
@@sadhiquet5495 🤣🤣🤣great joke
@shovan7039 Жыл бұрын
@@sadhiquet5495 and he spend his life in luxury, don't get into the khadi outfit, that's just for formality
@South_Asian.Fascist-98 Жыл бұрын
@@sadhiquet5495 Ignoring the Conversion of 2000 Hindus, Accusing the Victim to Resist for the Wrong doing, Giving away the 55 Crore to Pakistan, Snatching away presidency from SCB, Didn't let Vallabhai to become PM and what not! Everyone has flaws! He did United People of Bharat through NCM and Civil Disobedience but execution didn't reach the Goal! The Man Who was able to unite us a whole was Subash Chandra Bose!
@vedanshshukla6772 Жыл бұрын
My principal said in his speech on 14th nov. that nehru ji ko bachhe bhot pasand the,my friends & i literally shouted "aur mountbatten" bhi it was a hella moment even some teachers laughed 😭🤌.. ps- I'm in a school which is close to Vidya Bharti n all
@Navanildey_ Жыл бұрын
he was pedophile shuklaji
@patel.nilesh Жыл бұрын
@Rajat katal Kal he paida hua hai bhai tu....bada hoga to Jaan jayega😂
@shubhamchorwadi357 Жыл бұрын
@@patel.nilesh muje bhi nhi pata hai
@Nicks_Info Жыл бұрын
your friend is GIGA CHAD
@downhearted_prodigy Жыл бұрын
Mountbatten was a British officer wife in navy jo nehru aur nehru ji ke bed ke bhoot pass thi
@sagarrana2666 Жыл бұрын
German shepherd:- I fear no man But that thing Sham Sharma Sir It scares me
@snehachandra577 Жыл бұрын
Finally a video about truth of India , Mad resoect sir!
@allahlesboslu2_9 Жыл бұрын
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
@ex-muslim--zakirnalayak4703 Жыл бұрын
@@allahlesboslu2_9 mashalla
@akshayupadhyay5109 Жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/hGSoZmZqgtWefrc
@Adarsh.Singh555 Жыл бұрын
Not about truth but about propoganda 🤞
@mayur7164 Жыл бұрын
Watch this "Sahebs | History of Subversion of India" from channel: Prachyam
@chakravarthipathrudu9648 Жыл бұрын
Just seen "sahebs - who never left" really a goosebumps episode by prachyam. Now waiting for this
@ommadityarakshitxf3129 Жыл бұрын
Yeah recently Abhi and niyu commented on that one That vdo is much researched before uploading
@shivam958 Жыл бұрын
Spine chilling revelations
@allahlesboslu2_9 Жыл бұрын
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
@namu4380 Жыл бұрын
That video is just below this video for me . Gonna watch it.
@hmj3547 Жыл бұрын
@@namu4380 A Moa??
@neerajbhattacharjee8492 Жыл бұрын
I am afraid to hear when people says Nehru like children 😜🤣
@mdalimirza52398 ай бұрын
Sardar Ballav Bai Patel actually didn't want to get Kashmir at first. But Nehru wanted to add Kashmir by any cost because it was his birth place.
@Ayush-ty3dr Жыл бұрын
In case anyone missed it ! Prachyam has released the Indic documentary " Sahebs:who never left " ! Kindly watch it and share too ! It's high time to push Indic Narattive 🍂
@iskcon1118 Жыл бұрын
Caste discrimination is rooted not in religion but culture. Caste was an ancient system of occupational class delineated in Hindu texts that over the years developed into a rigid social hierarchy. The lowest castes, or untouchables, were marginalized and faced persecution. Caste-based discrimination is not intrinsic to Hinduism and should not be thought of as religiously sanctioned.
@akileshkrishna1694 Жыл бұрын
EXACTLY !!! 💯 💯 💯 Hare Krishna.
@vyomchaudhary6272 Жыл бұрын
@@Horizon429 Also many caste apologist who justify caste or who glorifies caste system say that caste system is a western construct. Well the best thing about hindutva is that hindutva opposes this bloody caste system
@titfortatt-regionalist Жыл бұрын
@@Horizon429 that verse says about qualities of a person, and also, please check who is Brahmin, read Bhagavad Gita (if u r a ☪️, then u will have to commit Shariya if u have to read other religion's books) Btw Islam- Shiya, Sunni, Ajlaf, Ashraf Christianity- Narad Christian, Dalit Christian, Syrian Christian, Catholics, Protestants, etc. See mirror before questioning others
@nihilist7269 Жыл бұрын
Caste system or hindusim train or railway tracks jesn hy . Alag alg hy pr sath me hin chalte hy 🙄 kuch bhi krlo baley hi saren hindu Caste system ko ab promote nhin krna chate pr phir bhi kyon caste system ko katm krne ki baat nhin krah hy. 🥺 Me hindusim ki baat kra ho sanatan dharm ki nhin jo vedic philosophy pr based hy spirituality pr. Jabki hindusim mixture khichdi hy 🤫 . Caste system ,anglo adulteration , rituals festivals traditional ka mixture hy
@roguegamer2020 Жыл бұрын
@@Horizon429but good or bad are qualities your point don't proof anything
@jagrutsanatani9510 Жыл бұрын
Don't even call his name with "ji". He deserves "chhee"
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@closedinfinity9019 Жыл бұрын
Naheru was Never Elected... It was Sardar.. Alway He was there Due to Gandi... A worse enemy of State.. He did not Love Bharat.
@introvert2023 Жыл бұрын
Ranganathan Sir was best in pointing out nehru as a scavenger
@bhaskarwatve5236 Жыл бұрын
Scavenger. Best possible word for This Non Hindu suar ki awlad.
@darklord-ue8if Жыл бұрын
Greet work mann Finally someone talks about crusade war , atrocities hindu woman Kewp the great work up Jai siya raam 🚩
@sunilkaushal7171 Жыл бұрын
Great job putting Nehru’s legacy in perspective. “Good intentions poor…”
@knnpillai7438 Жыл бұрын
Nehru will remain a hero in the minds of all future generations. All attempts to belittle him wll never be successful.
@meempuraofficial Жыл бұрын
That Harry Potter part was just hilarious 🤣🤣🤣
@nishanktiwari1998 Жыл бұрын
Abra Kadabra! 😂😂😂
@localnerd104 Жыл бұрын
Basically, Lehru Chicha was among those Brown Saheb who never left India. Now Pappu is forwarding his legacy. By the way, Your videos are serious and full of Humor.
@BUSHCRAFTSURVIVAL Жыл бұрын
you should watch Sahebs Who Never Left by Prachyam
@chaitanyavelamala7268 Жыл бұрын
@@BUSHCRAFTSURVIVAL He most probably has seen that considering how he framed his sentence
@localnerd104 Жыл бұрын
@@chaitanyavelamala7268 exactly
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@localnerd104 Regardless of how much illiterate Sanghis work to brainwash you, the facts will never change.
@localnerd104 Жыл бұрын
@@UJ00UJ Same for chamchas and chatukaars as well
@mithushm3 ай бұрын
It's believed that "NEHRU", the surname was abducted from "NEHRI"... Courtesy "M. Mathai", the PS to Gazi Nehri's Son.
@Oregunian2 ай бұрын
Shambhav Ji is a true Hindu cultural nationalist. He was educated in a gurkul and lives a sadhu life in Hardwar. Be like Shambhav Ji 😂
@theplmotivationofficial Жыл бұрын
Sam sharma and german shepard are tied by kuku FM 🤣
@sugubeta Жыл бұрын
Just like your father's 😂😂😂
@rphanidattu1515 Жыл бұрын
😂😂
@realdemigod4339 Жыл бұрын
Calling him complicated character is silly, you are giving more credit than he deserves, he clearly had ulterior motives, and it was not good intention and bad execution, it was bad intention and well executed.
@malsh01 Жыл бұрын
Heartily agree with you
@kushwanthsai49 Жыл бұрын
If he had ulterior motives. Why does he care to even come to india. He was rich enough to stay back in Britain and relax there. He did want to do something to india. Why did he even marry kamala(his wife) and come back to india. He could have settled by marrying there itself. Narrow minded thinking
@kushwanthsai49 Жыл бұрын
I don't agree with sham on this one. Read his books. He was right for his age and Time for most part
@laxmipujari9395 Жыл бұрын
So true.
@shreyanshyadav8655 Жыл бұрын
What tells you that he had ulterior motives
@gratitude_belief Жыл бұрын
Now It is in the list of my one of my Favourite Video's... Gonna share to my Max contacts. 🔥🙏
@ManishGupta-vc6cw Жыл бұрын
Once a hero forgotten as a culprit, not because of his deeds but fruit of whtapp University..got independence in 1947 with famines & unsecured borders & disputes with in country with royal states...my only question is with out the consent of prime minister sardar Patel ji can go for state vilay or war against Nizam...we have great leaders don't blame or defame them.without knowing anything...
@Bobin1007 Жыл бұрын
His birthday should not be actually Children's Day it should be Chamdi Divas. ☝ no ka chamdi tha yeah. 1st product of Nepotism. He never won the election for 1st prime minister also. That Takla Monhandas wanted Gandhi name into History books. That is why he became the Prime Minister. His gifts to India are 75 years old Kashmir Issue, Nepal not being a part of India as state, when Nepal came up front that I want to become a part of India to name a few.
@hrishikeshbandgar2162 Жыл бұрын
His birthday should be actually called as traitor 's day .
@allahlesboslu2_9 Жыл бұрын
Lehru was as b @ d as British rule to india 🤣🤣 jo log bolte ki iit banaya AIIMS banaya arre ulti buddhio 🤣 British ne bhi rail , road , COEP , amu fund kiya to firr wo khudke acche ke liye same for lehruu . Koi bhi PM banta to institutions banna Tay tha
@yaamdut.001 Жыл бұрын
Nepal alag desh hi thik hain bhai, Nepal is a independent Hindu Rashtra now. So, let that go.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@yaamdut.001 no it's not Hindu nation for last 15 years now. It's communist.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
Coward bootlicking Sanghis have no contribution in independence movement or in making of India. That's why they think everyone else should be treated like stupid Sanghis.
@nittorearun9435 Жыл бұрын
Please show this episode to your children to understand how opportunities for country’s development was missed high time & put against country’s interest.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
No, Sanghi knowledge shouldn't be shown to anybody.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@harshvardhan298 kata hua chutya detected
@rmrrao2675 Жыл бұрын
Nehru destroyed India's Auto, Aircraft, steel and other industries with his production limits, Licence Raj regime of seeking permission from him to make anything. Countries way behind India leapfrogged their development. His agents will tell you he built IITs. These institutes of elites trained students and sent them abroad to serve other countries.
@UJ00UJ Жыл бұрын
@@rmrrao2675 Nehru is the one who built it all. Uneducated Sanghi BJP is surviving by selling everything that he created. Go and get some education.
@krishnayogi Жыл бұрын
Best point of all
@drappukuttan44495 ай бұрын
Can't believe the comments. How these people are brainwashed thinking nehru was the villain.
@user-do4yo2kw4d2 ай бұрын
You can't blame the indian heroes because you forget that when mohatma ghandi struggled to azadi but RSS supported the British. Itihas ka patta dek lo jara. Sob kuch pata chal jayega
@Kavvagudemsunandha2 ай бұрын
Half knowledge is dangerous bro.If RSS wasn't in British army today Kashmir , Delhi was in control of Pakistan.because after independence Pakistan attacked India just after few months. Veer savarkar saw the SeCURilium of Muslims when he was in kala paani.thats why he suggested the rss to join the British army for training if he didn't suggested our Indian would be not ready for defence.And do you think only mohatma ghandi struggled to get independence😂😂😂😂😅
@sounakmallik4725 Жыл бұрын
Imagine if bjp existed after 1947 till now...there would have been no terrorism..
@anuragsarkar7671 Жыл бұрын
Netaji and his supporters used to beat up Hindu Mahasabha members.
@ajaykhanna2141 Жыл бұрын
*Hindu Rashtra* ❤️👑
@ChallaGamingYT Жыл бұрын
Imagine where India would be today if it was Netaji Subhas as the first PM.
@optionseller143 Жыл бұрын
Shayad fir india aaj hota hi nhi or aaj shyad hum Germany ya Japan ki colonial k under hote
@ruturajshiralkar5566 Жыл бұрын
Azadi ki jagah humhe Japan ya Germany ki Gulaami milti.
@adityahubli6517 Жыл бұрын
@@optionseller143 Nehru slave spotted
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in UNSC. Mr Chavda mentions about presenting on Nehru’s achievements which he has not done. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@ShahbazAlam-ph9mb Жыл бұрын
Netaji is a next level legend. Mahatma Gaandu is just shit.
@Kijaanamkaun Жыл бұрын
Lehru was the as wrong choice for PM's chair as it could get. An elite, culturally disconnected person who was more interested in Edwina than anything else was not the kind we needed then.
@sshyamnikhilesh4993 Жыл бұрын
Abhijit Chavda Sir always throws truth bombs
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@rahulmodi8706 Жыл бұрын
“The road to hell is paved with good intentions” - his ideology and arrogance destroyed the lives of millions of Indians
@DailyTimepass891 Жыл бұрын
Nehru ji took "make love, not war" very seriously!
@HackerTravis Жыл бұрын
,🤮
@speedyop7047 Жыл бұрын
Bhosdike wale Chacha kabhi neta ji na ban sake
@mr_factbody9053 Жыл бұрын
Teri dadi ma ka afair tha kya Nehru ke saath 😂🤣🤣
@anamikdas6 Жыл бұрын
Love ke bad war e ata hai, itna make love hoga to population baar jayga . So they will start fight
@ashiqmizan9287 Жыл бұрын
Make love means “Sex”. I am sure he didn’t mean that. Lol….
@GaneshIngale. Жыл бұрын
SARDAR PATEL ❤😊 #boycottcongress
@namansharma13 Жыл бұрын
We were blessed that we got Someone like Pandit Nehru as our First PM. Watsapp university se gyan lene walo ka sab ka yahi haal hai. Kitaabon main interest na ho to Watsapp uni. se hi gyan lena padta hai. Abhi I just read first 230 pages of The Discovery of India. Nehru was like a Gyan ka bhandaar. Well people like you won’t understand. Aap Watsapp Uni. main mehnat karte rahea aur all the best.
@antudas8471 Жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@vishnukant953 Жыл бұрын
One thing which I found regarding Nehru's contribution, that : After independence and during the process of decolonisation, many emerging third world nations had adopted democracy but very soon their leaders turned their political regime from democratic to military dictatorship like, in the case of non-aligned nations like Ghana, Chile... He controlled his ambitions by not entering in a totalitarian state, as he could if he wanted like others...
@arjunsinghrathore9252 Жыл бұрын
Sardar sahab is alive our hearts
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@jogendra8249 Жыл бұрын
Neheru Gandhi was British Agent 👍
@pavan.nudurupatisiva479 Жыл бұрын
Nehru is the worst of the worst... he made India run backwards... took us more than 50 years to undo what he did... still left with a lot of issues
@ARYANSHARMA-qg3yr Жыл бұрын
At 10:30 you said netaji and Subash Chandra Bose instead of nehru ji 😂😂😂, by the way love your videos
@LifeaAndLiving07 Жыл бұрын
Good to see that in the name of giving respect to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Subhas Chandra Bose we start abusing nehru and Gandhi 👏🏻👏🏻. We thought or true also that in past 70 years government did not pay such respect which sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Subhas Chandra Bose deserved but we also never disrespect and abuse any freedom fighters because all of them are our heroes and all of them are on same page. Leaders should be scrutinized and criticized for wrong decision and praised for good one but we should not disrespect any freedom fighters at all. It is very sad to see that we start abusing our heroes.
@bhavishyapathak9391 Жыл бұрын
Thats one i believes
@kandarpkhari_ Жыл бұрын
He is not our hero and never will be
@shifujikafan3720 Жыл бұрын
I am a centrist and u are right but we should not ignore their negative side
@DarkPheonix0702 Жыл бұрын
Bro ❤❤❤❤
@theinevitable8000 Жыл бұрын
Absolutely
@327partha Жыл бұрын
When Nehru Ji died & many congress leaders were crying, a very famous leader said "Why are you crying? What Nehru actually did?" He said, 'Nehru gave the INDIA ASH, Nehru gave the WORLD GAS, & Nehru gave his DAUGHTER CASH.'
@shobhitk89925 ай бұрын
Nehru was thinking 100 years ahead of his time. In 1947 he created IITs, IIM's, AIIMS, ISRO, DRDO, EPFO, LIC, SBI, RBI, Kendriya Vidyalayas etc
@anuragsrivastava4828 Жыл бұрын
20th November is International children's day. And 14 November is being celebrated as Children's day in India since 1957 and not 1964, as portrayed here. And nothing was shifted. We similarly celebrate Teachers' day on 5th September while the world does so on 5th October. Kindly refrain from spreading misinformation in the name of untold truth
@echochamber8350 Жыл бұрын
I disagree with the "good intentions" statement
@akhilrajt144 Жыл бұрын
7:17 I told same thing to one of my foreign friend. He asked me proof. Sadly I had only some random KZbin videoes as proofs. So he denied my statement.
@theinevitable8000 Жыл бұрын
That's why we tell to actually read and verify sources than to believe any random youtube guy Gandhi & nehru patel & bose were all true heroes
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@sevenseasgamerz5698 Жыл бұрын
I have lost enthusiasm for children's day.... This time I didn't even wish happy children's day to my kids or in WhatsApp groups. I hate chicha Nehru sooooo much that I find this celebration disgusting!!
@undamatlaraju3922 Жыл бұрын
తక్షణం చేయాల్సిన పనులు... 1.నెహ్రూ పేరుతో ఉన్న అన్ని సంస్థల, కట్టడాల, పథకాల, పురస్కారాల వగైరా వగైరా పేర్లు మార్చాలి 2. వాడే ఎంపిక చేసి,వాడికి వాడే ఇచ్చుకున్న భారత రత్న పురస్కారాన్ని వెనక్కి తీసుకోవాలి. 3. వాడి దిక్కుమాలిన, చచ్చు, సన్నాసి, నికృష్ట, సాంస్కృతిక విధ్వంస పాలన లో దేశం ఎంత నష్ట పోయిందో పాఠ్యాంశాల్లో సందర్భానుసారంగా వివరించాలి. 4. ఆడవాళ్ళ పిచ్చి ఉన్న ఈ చిత్త కార్తే గాడి పేరు తీసేసి,బాలల దినోత్సవం రోజు ఎవరో ఒక మహనీయుని పేరు పెట్టాలి 5. దేశ విభజనకు కారణం అయ్యి, లక్షలాది హిందువుల ధన మాన ప్రాణాలు బలిగొనీ, కాశ్మీర్ ను రావణ కాష్టం గా మార్చిన ఈ దేశద్రోహి విగ్రహాలను దేశ వ్యాప్తంగా వెంటనే తొలగించాలి 6. వీడి స్మారక కట్టడాలను, భరత జాతి ముద్దు బిడ్డ నేతాజీ సుభాష్ చంద్రబోస్ వారి జీవిత చరిత్ర తెలిపే పవిత్ర క్షేత్రలుగా మార్చాలి.
@dreamscometrue2068 Жыл бұрын
*I want to bring this to your notice.Please watch 'SHAHEB'S WHO NEVER LEFT'.A groundbreaking reality of congress and India.I want you to please make a video about this and make it viral as it should be made noticed by other Indians🙏*
@AdeshAtole Жыл бұрын
Left or Right, Kuku FM is permanent
@the90sbornmallukid18 Жыл бұрын
One quality of Nehru ji I admire is that he was very nuch insistent on India catching up with technology ( space research, nuclear power, defence research..etc..) with the western nations even when the liberals and communistsythen arguing India should not be looking towards technological development since it is a poor country. At least that he did not fall for the liberal narrative.
@bhabak.2oot Жыл бұрын
Lol mallu
@user-nw9mr2by3i7 ай бұрын
In reality this is not even 1 percent of bad side of nehru
@gamingpro3270 Жыл бұрын
I must that Nehru Ji's legacy is totally irrelevant in today's india. We only remember him when it's 14th November. 😅
@mb59621 Жыл бұрын
People seem to be seeming the real connection between Nehru and children. Nehru liked children . Mountbatten had a fetish for small children . Nehru liked Edwina . Edwina do , children lo.
@syamalans3214 Жыл бұрын
His father financied Gandhis political shows and purchased pm post according to Bratish interest. The sole agents of Indian disasters (partition and conseqens of wars and terrerism) Nehru and Gandhi Any dought read The real untold truth behind the closed door of the Indian independence movements . Con Gvt banned book written by an Indian read 56 years ago. Ever since the real heroes Chandra sekhar Azad Bhagath sing ,Nethaji lives in my Indian heart .
@thribhuc2827 Жыл бұрын
Close ties to USA too early = Pakistan, S. Korea, Germany. Weak foreign politics (at best), mediocre economy (at best).
@NANUFREEFIRE Жыл бұрын
Hamare school me kisine bhi children's day celebrate nhi kiya 100% true I am not lying
@hagemaru-uk69pm Жыл бұрын
Jai shree Ram♥️ Without lies Islam dies Support Ex Muslims sahil adam seeker and zafar heretic channel💪
@ShivamKumar-cs4lu Жыл бұрын
why we Indians are intent on ruining the legacy of our heroes. Be it what Congress did to Savarkar or what the BJP is now doing to Gandhi and Nehru, Why don't we make these efforts to bring out the truth about real monsters like Churchill? I can acknowledge that two or three years ago, I knew Churchill as a war hero of the 2nd World War, not as a mass murderer who has killed millions of Indians. Is not that shameful for me as an Indian?
@ajaymall6575 Жыл бұрын
7:35 this is completely a lie. If you read the formation of UN then u understand 5 permanent member usa England Russia china and France was there on very first place in 1945. In 1945 china was a republic country after 1950 communist china came to power. So that time USA thought to offer permanent seat i.e. by replacing china. They thought but not offered. They started monitoring Nehru’s trip to South East Asia in June 1950. India had supported US’s first UNSC resolution on North Korea. Although reluctantly, India also supported their second resolution, which talked about aiding South Koreans with arms. But during the third resolution, which was about US taking over command of all the UN forces in the Korean War, India refused to vote in favour of America. With that, the whole idea of establishing India as an American ally effectively ended, and, consequently, US’s attempts to induct India into the UNSC. And the same story goes in 1958 with a slightly different challenge. P.s. India never offered a permanent seat in the UN. All offers made by the US state department was casual not a serious offer. Remember It's 1950 USA was deeply aligned with Pakistan not India. Nehru legacy 1 IIT 2 IIM 3 BARC 4 AIMS 5 Right to vote every individual 6 planning commission now called niti ayog Many more
@chinmay6144 Жыл бұрын
If country was broken in the name of religion then why only we are still following the Secularism
@shifujikafan3720 Жыл бұрын
becoz we have Jews,Christians,Sikh,Jains etc.
@siddarthshah1773 Жыл бұрын
@@shifujikafan3720 hahaha sikh is not a religion.. christians were converted by discriminatory taxes so were mullas and i am a jain.. dont try to full us.. first learn sikh religious books its all about hinduism.. joker.. i can write write and write about how their guru maharaj itself were devout hindus
@chinmay6144 Жыл бұрын
@@shifujikafan3720 Christmas and Jews ka Jane ne origin alag he. Sikh or Jain to alane hi bande he na bhai.
@VishalThakur-mb5gi Жыл бұрын
but subash chandra boss is also socialist and anti american so if he become pm india will be on same path as nehru , actually all our freedom fighter are socialist and communist ( bhagat singh) so its difficult if we think that we become capitalist like japan and south korea which are heavily monitor by USA
@chetanjejurkar7449 Жыл бұрын
Becoz of nehru we lost permanent seat to UN, lost war to china, lost POK, aksai chin. Such a disgrace
@sarthakgupta7108 Жыл бұрын
We get institution like iit, iim, aiims and isro because of nehru brother please make moderate view.
@chetanjejurkar7449 Жыл бұрын
@@sarthakgupta7108 doesn't sum up the fact that prior blunders he committed before iit,aiims etc
@sarthakgupta7108 Жыл бұрын
@@chetanjejurkar7449 I am not saying that he is a perfect at his job nobody is perfect in this world every one has pros and cons but their intention is not bad for country.
@chetanjejurkar7449 Жыл бұрын
@@sarthakgupta7108 his actions does support his intentions
@GawaroKaMasiha Жыл бұрын
The Sham Sharma Show And Guests On Renveer's Podcast Opened My Eyes And Changed The Perspective Of ( shri 😖 ) Gandhi And Nehru
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@Ovijitbasu Жыл бұрын
Nehru ek Muslim tha aur oh Hindu ko discrimination karte the
@Aryann-sharma Жыл бұрын
अब्दुल हो या आफताब सबने पढ़ी है एक ही किताब💯🔥🔥
@vsgopalakrishnan Жыл бұрын
Nehruji was great in many aspects. But you have omitted to say that HIS WORST MISTAKE WAS IN ERECTING A DYNASTIC SUCCESSION. No one had a clue about economics. India lost valuable time till 1991 when we openedup.
@MultiVisel Жыл бұрын
He was never elected, niether selected, he was one of favorites of karamchand.
@dilipgodara Жыл бұрын
The truth that you are freely making a video on him without any fear is because of him
@AsmitkPapa Жыл бұрын
The biggest legacy of jehru ji is Kashmir ssue which is still relevant, after claim millions of lives and economical advancement of our country
@md.suhail81816 ай бұрын
You are right
@Ani-ii7jg Жыл бұрын
Nehru for me is the first Sattalobhi PM of Independent India
@bhautikpatel8769 Жыл бұрын
Watch khan sir, oza sir, vikas divyakriti sir , study iq ias, drishti ias, dont make blindly faith in one youtuber👍🙏
@utkarshagrawal2002 Жыл бұрын
Ya we saw both. And alsp this youtuber said that nehrujis intention was never bad they were good but execution was bad just like notrbandi with good intention but bad execution
@banda224 Жыл бұрын
My favorite love story is nehru-Edwina's❤️ story and the role of Mountbatten🧐 (husband of her) for developing love between them.😅
@suvojitdutta3913 Жыл бұрын
Nehru already had in his mind what could be the consequences of those acts which u r calling as "good intentions". In other words, he deliberately did those acts for his self interest and political interest. After all, he is a politician, he has far seeing ability. A politician has the power to understand what can be the consequence of a particular act.
@harisbhai20 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with the fact as to how JN was chosen rather than elected as PM and how Vallabh bhai had to give away what should have been his role, clearly Gandhi was enamoured by Nehru’s outlook and charisma. But the manner in which he has been presented in this clip reveals a very biased view of a freedom fighter who was the longest serving PM of India. Nehru inherited a different India, an India ravaged by British excesses, an India that still had states yet to accede to the Union of India (like Kashmir, Hyderabad etc). He had a lot of challenges at the time. He played a lot of roles besides PM and was involved in making many major decisions militarily, financially etc. His vision of India was that of a modern, advanced, self-reliant sovereign country. He wanted India to be a secular country perhaps left leaning. He did not want to be a pawn in the hands of US or Russia when they sent ‘feelers’ around to have India’s view on joining the UN Security Council in 1950 and 1955 respectively. Don’t you think this would have been vetoed by other member countries like ROC (Republic of China), France which were already members. The UN charter had to be amended to accommodate India and this would have required all 5 members to agree. When the UN was actually found (created), US, UK, ROC, Russia and France ratified the UN charter to become permanent members. In 1971, when PROC (People’s Republic of China) was recognised by the UN as the sole legal China that they replaced ROC at the UNSC. Nehru did not want to create an enduring animosity with China, with whom we share our border. He wanted to establish a long-term relationship with it. He believed that India would one day earn its place in the UNSC. As a responsible researcher of history, he has to present a balanced view and also explain what was or may have been Nehru’s thinking and vision behind the decisions he took. We owe some respect to a man who spent years in jail during the freedom struggle and helmed the most important role of PM during very difficult times for India. Most women of his household including his mother fought for the freedom of India and his daughter was assassinated as serving PM. Hindsight is a wonderful thing. It is very easy to pick holes in a fabric without understanding what the fabric has been through it’s lifetime- it may have clothed a person, kept food warm, cleaned the worst surfaces, used as a tie if long enough etc. What I mean it is very easy to pick up on someone’s mistakes and state they should have done it this way or that way and things would have been rosier. Nehru chose of mix of socialism with private enterprise. He did not go the American way ‘consumerist’, ‘capitalist’ because he did not like American society or culture. Perhaps if he chosen the American way, we would have been a less religious and more agnostic society like the US, UK, Europe and there would less religious conflicts and more cultural acceptance and tolerance of diversity as it is in these countries now
@amitdahiya8746 Жыл бұрын
Jai Shree Ram Jai Hind Sir 🙏🙏
@Arrow-gk7hg Жыл бұрын
J Nehru did everything other than protecting the national interest of India .
@himanshusingh-ko6ey Жыл бұрын
Yakeen mano current ki sarkar to jaise good planning aur very good execution ka example hai 😌
@vrshenoy Жыл бұрын
How can you call the intentions of a British proxy good? You are being too kind. Nehru's intentions were British and their execution was good.
@neonargon8048 Жыл бұрын
Those who criticise modi for being a dictator either dont know about nehru or purposedly avoid the topic
@Supriyos_on_YT Жыл бұрын
10:38 bro called Nehru Netaji ☠️
@darshangurav5671 Жыл бұрын
सर, विर पृथ्वीराज चौहान जी🚩 की तुलना नेहरू से करना गलत है
@maheshpariharvines7492 Жыл бұрын
😁
@shivam958 Жыл бұрын
Please review on the documentry by Prachyam - Sahebs Wo Never Left
@Come_with_me9 Жыл бұрын
the greatest prime minister Narendra Modi and Great Jaishankar Ji is key of New INDIA