Fletch has spoken. All other opinions on the subject matter are now null & void
@iatsd5 жыл бұрын
Given he's frequently wrong, you'd have to be a fool to take anyting he says these days as gospel.
@davidlyon18995 жыл бұрын
@@iatsd Yeah,but,they,can,do,ANYTING.
@QuizmasterLaw5 жыл бұрын
yes, i used to think "this looks useless". thus am i schooled!
@jasskeeper81525 жыл бұрын
@@iatsd he's human being, it's normal.
@daviddevries82425 жыл бұрын
@@iatsd Please give me examples.
@NetTopsey5 жыл бұрын
1:38 "Except that without an engine of course the thing's absolutely useless" Another Fletcherism to throw at my friends.
@chaz87585 жыл бұрын
Without an engine they were used as trailers to carry supply's (towed behind tanks on the attack) and even for one of the first mine clearing line charges - the Conger.
@AirsoftReviewArgentina5 жыл бұрын
The sense of humor in this man is just priceless
@jakedee41175 жыл бұрын
Farmers around my home town bought these universal carriers as war surplus. They used them as tractors and general utility vehicles on boggy ground. Then I guess in the 60s and 70s they dumped them as they broke down and better 4X4s became available. Then in the 90s and 00's collectors dug them out of the swamps and started to restore them. It would be interesting to know the price of this vehicle when it was first produced, its price as war surplus and its price today as a restored running vehicle.
@stephenjones65005 жыл бұрын
@mandellorian £45,000 ish i still want one 😀
@Alan.livingston5 жыл бұрын
Same in Australia. Lots of surplus ended up as workhorses on farms.
@richardo365 жыл бұрын
In BC they were used as sliders for pulling logs out of the bush.
@spudgunn86955 жыл бұрын
I was brought up in Hampshire in the UK, near the South Downs, and there were two farmers still using these to get feed out to livestock in the winter in the 1980's. They also did a sideline in military reenactments. They might still be using them for all I know, I moved away in 1990...
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
That "armor" was a lot of extra weight to lug around. Did they cut the side and front plates away and just use the hull and running gear?
@thoughtful_criticiser4 жыл бұрын
My father spent his entire war in one. Across North Africa, Italy, Normandy, through Western Europe and into Germany. He loved it. Beats walking!
@herrrobert53405 жыл бұрын
I want David Fletcher to tuck me in at night and read me bedtime stories of WW2 AFVs.
@LMSILVIA5 жыл бұрын
Weird but understandable...
@spamuraigranatabru11495 жыл бұрын
I can relate.
@jacobq.22045 жыл бұрын
You just want the mustache tickles that come after ;)
@chrisbullock35045 жыл бұрын
dont we all?
@allanstott69995 жыл бұрын
Thought it was just me.
@jasoncarswell74585 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher drives to work in a Universal Carrier. He needed something heavy enough to carry his mustache.
@zxbzxbzxb15 жыл бұрын
Must say I rather envisioned the 'Tasche-man travelling to work on a Challenger 2 and leading a convoy of 12 Centurian tanks and 40 support vehicles carrying teams of special forces bodyguards
@@Rutherford_Inchworm_III They should stick a bagpiper in the back to provide suitably British traveling music. It's only fair, really. Think of all that mustache has done for us!
@TheCimbrianBull5 жыл бұрын
@@Gj23jk2 Ask not what you can do for your country but ask what your mustache can for your country.
@orangejoe2045 жыл бұрын
David seems to have trimmed his Frontal Bristle Armor there. I can actually see the lad's mouth!
@A.F.M.B.12345 жыл бұрын
I love these things; Are they any good at fighting? Nah Are they powerful? Nah Can they traverse anything? Nah So what do they do? *anything!* Carry stuff, pull stuff, transport people, brew tea, transport stuff, It's like giving a soldier a crowbar It's not a weapon, but ain't nobody is gonna complain about having a crowbar!
@TheLastSterling13045 жыл бұрын
Are they any good at fighting? Ask the Germans if they like Wasps. Are they powerful? Is a bullet proof, self-propelled 50.cal mount powerful? Can they traverse anything? Can a jeep do better? Never underestimate the power of a "utilty" vehicle. Given enough time, and the PBI will make some 40k~esk modification that even the factories start properly building them.
@jaykayguns5 жыл бұрын
😂
@Listless_Robin5 жыл бұрын
To be fair they were *universal* carriers. They were actually made to traverse pretty much everything from the mud of Normandy to the sands of north Africa all the way to the snow on the Eastern front!
@danthesupplyman41135 жыл бұрын
Gordon Freeman would like to disagree with your statement of a crowbar not being a weapon
@pheels4 жыл бұрын
The universal carrier is like an enlarged tracked jeep in many respects was interesting to see the jeep trailer in the video
@ironheadr32 жыл бұрын
When I was about 8 or 9 years old my parents owned a petrol station and there was one of these in a paddock beside it. One day some army blokes came and worked it and actually got it going. A lot of the kids in the area had a ride. One of my best childhood memories.
@lemonflavouredquark5 жыл бұрын
My favourite variant was used by the NZ division. What you did was loot an automatic 20mm cannon from a crashed plane and attach it to the carrier.
@simonmorris42263 жыл бұрын
I want one!😈
@MakingMoneyyy8576 ай бұрын
Ive seen photos with 50cals and piats but not a hispano cannon! The Nz brigade were the best scroungers in the african campaign so not surprised!
@MrAnticlimate5 жыл бұрын
Rommel mentioned in his memoirs the advantage the British infantry had over the Axis, by the fact that it was heavily mechanized*. Even if they had to give up their positions they could retreat withou heavy losses, thanks to such vehicles as this one. *or at least motorized
@alecblunden86155 жыл бұрын
There was only one fully mechanised army at the outbreak of war - it wasn't the Germans, the Americans or the French. It was the British.
@Marc83Aus5 жыл бұрын
@@alecblunden8615 Which was shortly afterwards donated to Germany. The war wouldn't have lasted as long if they hadn't been able to prop up their appalling logistics with captured British, French, Czech and later Russian Vehicles. The Czech was so important they might likely have lost the invasion of france without it.
@Angrybogan3 жыл бұрын
The Italians got badly defeated by the British because they weren't mechanised /motorised and the British were.
@Rednukegaming5 жыл бұрын
' and also in Canada .... which is another country.....' greatness
@Giloup925 жыл бұрын
But the same queen 👸 !
@byebye18135 жыл бұрын
@@Giloup92 unfortunately.
@PatGilliland5 жыл бұрын
@@byebye1813 Oi!
@MrCyphermonkey5 жыл бұрын
Taken out of context.
@sandgrownun665 жыл бұрын
+Rednukegaming Did you actually listen to what David said in the video? He said, to quote: "And also in Canada, which is another country that turned out a huge number of them".
@ResaFMkII5 жыл бұрын
'Armoured vehicles need engines.' Cheers Fletch.
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
Now you know where you went wrong. 😄
@potatopants46915 жыл бұрын
Armored bicycle says hi
@BluJean66923 жыл бұрын
this has only been true for 100 years so it's worth noting lmao
@Zorro91293 жыл бұрын
I thought it was pedal-powered?
@Mad_S3 жыл бұрын
I can't believe 222,000 people forgot to like this. I absolutely love your presentation. Laid back and proffesional with a good sense of humor.
@kenclements30015 жыл бұрын
All across Canada, you'll see these vehicles parked out in from of Legion branches and armouries as a static display commemorating WW2.
@Lennart_Jensen5 жыл бұрын
Now I know what I can wish for christmas. A cute little Universal Carrier.
@Wolvenworks5 жыл бұрын
preferably with an AT gun mounted on it?
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
If you see a rather large box under the Christmas tree do not say I wonder what that is. We all know what that is. 😄
@thatguyoverthere96345 жыл бұрын
I prefer the top mounted 1917
@paulnorris82915 жыл бұрын
I'd love one too, one of my top five tanks though its not exactly a tank but its got to have a 50cal on board.
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
You'd bust your shins on the steering box and curse it by New Years.
@idanceforpennies2814 жыл бұрын
I met a New Zealand farmer who had several as work vehicles. It was common there into the late1960s. No better advertisement, farmers are totally pragmatic and don't use junk that loses them money.
@melorange1678 Жыл бұрын
Also used in the big forestry industry. Not mentioned was a lot produced at the GM Factory in Petone, New Zealand.
@TornadoADV5 жыл бұрын
I consider them as more capable Jeeps rather then direct armored vehicles.
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
Except the were used for far more than just a light truck. They really did use them as APCs and as self-propelled MGs during assaults.
@F4Wildcat5 жыл бұрын
@@jamestheotherone742 And they were armored. Okay, just enough for rifle calibres, but armored none the less
@daviddevries82425 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say they are objectively more capable. They have some advantages over the Jeep but the reverse is also the case.
@ptonpc5 жыл бұрын
They were not supposed to be used as armour. Some 113,000 were built up till 1960.
@daviddevries82425 жыл бұрын
@@ptonpc More of these built than jeeps? According to what source? Or did you just assume?
@landarjohnson57415 жыл бұрын
“We gave a lot to the Russians; God knows what they made of them.”
@QuizmasterLaw5 жыл бұрын
I am still researching this but the obvious go-to move is the 76mm cannon.
@tomb76425 жыл бұрын
Russians: ah good they sent us more flat packs so we can make more T-34's!
@QuizmasterLaw5 жыл бұрын
@@tomb7642 2500 were sent in total though ru wikipedia doesn't say much more than that. ru.qwertyu.wiki/wiki/Universal_Carrier
@RGDcommentnode5 жыл бұрын
I'm sure some of the Russian soldier appreciated having a vehicle to ride on.
@dukenukem83815 жыл бұрын
they just stored them in Siberia and later sold them to western collectors for profit and bitched about how much lendlease did not help them
@Stoic-of-Rome5 жыл бұрын
My great uncle went to war in a bren gun carrier in the BEF aged 18. He had to leave it at Dunkirk and swim for it. Then fought The Africa corp in in his universal carrier in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya. Then Anzio and up through italy, before being returned to Britain to take part in the D-day landings. His war was ended when he was killed by machine gun fire from the SS panzer corp on the outskirts of Bayeux. Great vehicle for flanking gun positions, trenches and even armoured units.
@michaelvalenzuela25284 ай бұрын
I`ve called the "Bren Carrier" ever since I built the AIRFIX kit around 1970.
@stutzada5 жыл бұрын
"They didn't *like* them, but they used them."
@johnalan60675 жыл бұрын
Reminds me to Rumsfeld's quote when asked about Humvees in the second Iraqi war.
@andreww20985 жыл бұрын
I think the US built an extended version the second axle was made the same as the front one with 2 wheels instead of one, and an extended cargo area called the T16
@tomb76425 жыл бұрын
@Tom Sanders tell Fritz, I don't give a damn! *Boing boing boing*
@tomb76425 жыл бұрын
@Klantvinder.com they don't like 🦋 butterflies?
@MrFleem5 жыл бұрын
@@tomb7642 That's right, monarch butterflies taste terrible. I've never found any that I liked.
@larsschroter69945 жыл бұрын
I want a David Fletcher miniature figurine to put next to things in need of explanations! Would also look quite nice next to model tanks.
@bgoth14355 жыл бұрын
Now there's a business idea, I'd buy one!
@williamcarrington614 жыл бұрын
War gamers would agree , l'm sure ?
@gordonlekfors27083 жыл бұрын
and people seeing it would ask you why in the world you have a maniature of a homeless man.
@CybershamanX5 жыл бұрын
David once again makes my day! Not to get into specifics (I'm in a bad way medically/physically), but every time I listen to this man talk I just feel better. I don't know what it is, but I just feel like everything is going to be OK. Thanks, David! I hope things are going better for you than they are for me! ;) Btw, if I may speak on behalf of everyone here, I hope he knows he's well liked (well, more than that, really!). I gather that he might not go in for all of this "high tech nonsense", but in my opinion that just accentuates his charm. While I also have the feeling that he might not "get it", I at least hope he appreciates it on some level. I wonder if he tells the boys down at the pub about how he's a big KZbin star now... ;) Anyway, thank you so much for having him be part of the whole team (you're all great,too!). I always love what he has to say and the depth of his knowledge just astounds me sometimes. Here's to many more years of Tank Chats with David Fletcher! :D
@tutnallman3 жыл бұрын
I was privileged to spend some days with Sidney Jary. During this we discussed the use of the "bren Carrier" by the infantry. typically it carried their Kit- Large pack equivalent, resupplied ammunition, ferried hot food forward- even in contact, and removed casualties to company aid post . It enabled the infantry to fight more effectively. It was very reliable and they felt they couldn't function without it. Sidney was a wonderful man by the way.
@Ed-ty1kr4 жыл бұрын
As a former infantry soldier, I like the thing. Anything to save my knees is useful. Even today they are talking about cumbersome exoskeletons to help carry loads... when they could just bring this thing back, and save their backs.
@zenzen9131 Жыл бұрын
My father drove one of these for the 2nd Btn of the Monmouthshire Regiment who went over to France about 10 days after D-Day I think. They got as far as Antwerp when he was shot through the arm and was on a DC-3 back to Blighty the very same day. Subsequently the regiment took massive casualties in supporting the Americans during the Battle of the Bulge. All officers and most of the NCOs were killed and not many returned home at all. Lest we forget !
@VitaminsB12125 жыл бұрын
The universal always struck me as basically an armored jeep, so incredibly versatile like the jeep but now armored up and tracked
@timengineman2nd71411 ай бұрын
Exactly! I wonder why they just didn't just run the exhaust system up and back and put heat shields around it to protect the troops....
@thetourettesgamer88515 жыл бұрын
The god of all Tanks and various other armoured fighting vehicles has spoken
@Zoydian5 жыл бұрын
I totally love Mister Fletcher's tank chats! Not only they are very informative, but I must admit I also use them as a means to relax. His voice, together with the soft hum of the airco in the background are a recipe for inner peace... thank you, Mister David Fletcher!
@MrSGL214 жыл бұрын
this guy is one of the best personalities on youtube.i feel like i have an old British uncle who works at a tank museum.
@johnsabini33515 жыл бұрын
Like the way he ends his presentations - no fuss "thank you very much" Old School British Gent!
@billestew7535 Жыл бұрын
Just 2 of these vehicles armed with Vickers.303 machine guns as well as Bren guns could give smaller infantry units withering fire support, but my favorite version is the wasp flamethrower vehicle, as dangerous for the crew as it was to the enemy seeing as it had a large fuel tank in the back of the vehicle, the Germans hated it.
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
When your alternative is walking, anything will do.
@Bird_Dog005 жыл бұрын
Unless it's a Matilda 1...
@Celebmacil5 жыл бұрын
The worst ride is better than the best walk.
@allangibson84945 жыл бұрын
@@Rabhadh Canada had trucks (about one for every three Canadian soldiers were made).
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
@@allangibson8494 Most of them were carrying logistics and none of them would get them across that last 500m.
@allangibson84945 жыл бұрын
@@jamestheotherone742 Without logistics you don't get to the last 500m. That was the Axis powers one uniform failure - all of them without exception had lousy logistics and as a result had troops starving without fuel in the field. For examples, on D-day the German troops hadn't had food for four days. About 10% of the Canadian trucks wound up armored (they were converted to armored cars).
@ADVtheMISSIONARY5 жыл бұрын
a bunch of Aussies in Carriers charging across a field with guns blazing.......yes Aussies loved them
@SgtMjr5 жыл бұрын
My Uncle CSM W.E. Bird RWR was KIA in one of these 25 Sept '44 near Calais. Bringing up ammo he was directing the driver where to go when he was shot by a sniper. There was a warning message sent to avoid the lanes near the orchard where the action was but sadly Uncle Bill didn't get the note. In a scene much like in Saving Private Ryan the sniper was caught and almost executed on the spot but was spared. Turned out he was a Lithuanian not a German and was kept as helper and servant before eventually being sent to the POW cages.
5 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr David Fletcher.. Your efforts are appreciated by many.
@jameswright39325 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher... what a gent.. a star! Thank you sharing all your incredible knowledge.. captivating!!!
@paulwallis75864 жыл бұрын
The Boyes anti-tank rifle got a new lease of life among the Aussies at Tobruk. Useless as an anti-tank weapon, but with "a lot of stopping power" against infantry, according to my old man.
@sandgrownun665 жыл бұрын
As well as the UK and Canada. These were also built in Australia, New Zealand and the USA.
@keithammleter3824 Жыл бұрын
Tank Museum guy said they were made in Britain and Canada. Actually, they were made in various places. Large numbers were made in Australia, principally by the South Australian Railways Workshops. Quite a few were made in the USA, as Britain could not make enough. My father drove one in Australian Army service in North Africa. He said they were a typical British military design - inadequate space for the driver, uncomfortable, prone to breakdown, must have been designed by a committee.
@beckster1815 жыл бұрын
My Dad was in the Aussie 7th Div Cav Regt in WW2 and they had these things that were sent to Egypt and then grounded as not serviceable and required parts to be swapped to make them work ok when Japan entered the war they were recalled to Australia and after training for jungle fighting they were sent to Port Morsby in Papua New Guinea still with their carriers all grounded and once they arrived the carriers were all chained to some trees on the outskirts of Morsby and the Regt was sent to the north side of Papua New Guinea to a place called Sanananda Road where they fought as Infantry and when pulled out officially 9 months later the Regt consisted of less than 100 members all the rest had been KIA WIA or evacuated with serious illness and after that the unit was never sent as a whole into combat again and technically ceased to exist
@gregmottl9782 Жыл бұрын
My grandfather in Canada after the war. Purchased a Bren gun carrier. I know a little difrent then the Universal. He cut all the armor off and turned it into a flat deck tracked vehicle to use for moose hunting. With a winch set up in the back to winch a moose on. And to be able to get into the swampy areas while hunting. He used it right up into the 70s. Always wonder what ever happened to it. I am sure most likely was scrapped sometime after he stopped using it.
@pcka125 жыл бұрын
During WW1 horses and mules were used in vast numbers to haul everything including artillery around, in the 20 year interval between the wars the use of equines in peacetime activities fell drastically and the British Army changed into a mechanized force (interestingly the majority of the German army did not become mechanised). The British used lorries (trucks) artillery tractors and these things which follow on from the use of some WW1 tanks as freight vehicles to support the rapid advances made possible by those tanks which were fitted with guns. Whilst as always in war men suffered at least the carnage suffered by horses in previous conflicts was greatly reduced since horses have been just too vulnerable in war once 'modern ' weapons were developed.
@theromanorder2 жыл бұрын
2 years ago i came into my class room and my techer introduced me to this great chanel but because of the blocker at that school many videos in the playlist were skipped making this my first tank chats video Since then i have learned so much and hope one day i will be able to go to Britian and see all the many museums including the tank museum hope to see you there
@CharlesvanDijk-ir6bl5 жыл бұрын
"They were not supposed to pull AT-Guns but they did." So the carrier and the 6 pounder combo was not approved of? Thanks God rules are meant to be broken.
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
Needs must when the devil drives, and all that. Plus if you tell a group of men not to do it you know that they are.
@kirotheavenger605 жыл бұрын
He might mean that towing guns was not oart of the original design intention, rather than being generally discouraged.
@Rhubba5 жыл бұрын
The official towing vehicle for the 6pdr was the Lloyd Carrier which is similar to the UC. If the Lloyds broke down, then any UC would do.
@ptonpc5 жыл бұрын
The carriers were used for just about anything that could be thought of.
@chaz87585 жыл бұрын
The troops did what was needed, the British used tanks at times to tow the Infantry AT guns during an assault, this meant they had their AT guns ready right away for the inevitable counter attack rather than waiting for them to be brought up by rear echelon often by trucks.
@TheFflynnie4 жыл бұрын
My Father joined the Middlsex regiment in 1936 and started out on the Vickers machine gun, he used to talk about these, and was probably referring to the older vehicle, and probably left it on the beach in Dunkirk. on d day he was a bren gunner with the Middelsex , and was probably in one of these, he latter joined the Ox and Bucks, again as a bren gunner he finished up joining a company called T force, the ones that went behind enemy lines to capture various German scientist and other bits and pieces. He was demobbed in 1946. we are trying to trace his military history, love these clips keep em coming.
@dirus31425 жыл бұрын
Maybe Mr. Fletcher could do an audio book reading for The Chieftain's book.
@JLSMaytham3 жыл бұрын
The only thing my Dad ever told me about his war experience (Essex Regiment, North Africa and Italy) was that these things were useless for anything beyond bringing up supplies!
@isengard15005 жыл бұрын
The universal carrier was a war winning machine. Why? Logistics!
@Legitpenguins994 жыл бұрын
Just that word melts my brain
@poisonousteapot23944 жыл бұрын
Germany: logistics is judenphysik!
@davidquak43984 жыл бұрын
You can basicaly have every platoon outfitted with a cheap support vehicle
@davidquak43984 жыл бұрын
@@poisonousteapot2394 lol. That's hilarious
@Cancun7714 жыл бұрын
@@poisonousteapot2394 And goes on to steal wooden, horse-drawn _panjewagen_ from poor Russian peasants after their own "modern" horse-drawn carriages with rubber tiers have broken down and their own racially superior horses have all died.
@Womble-freestation663 жыл бұрын
I have some very fond memories of these great little vehicles. Firstly as a child at Steam Rallies where universal carries were used as paid rides around the fields. Later on in my youth & hitching home one cold fenland morning after a heavy night out & one of these pulled up. It was an amazing 20 mile drive & with my head in the breeze blew the evenings cobwebs away. An amazing experience & truly privileged to ride in one.
@neillh5 жыл бұрын
Australia and New Zealand both made universal carriers as well
@bipolarbear99174 ай бұрын
My dad was a WW2 D-Day and European Campaign veteran. He was in charge of 2x Universal Carriers each carrying a 3-inch mortar. I think there were 11 guys in his crew.
@lavrentivs98915 жыл бұрын
A private group vehicle collection in northern Sweden has one that was used by a power company for maintenance in areas without roads.
@kevcom20015 жыл бұрын
My Grandfather commanded a Universal Carrier in WW2. Glad to see it getting some love and a tank chat! It would probably make him happy to see it.
@TheLastSterling13045 жыл бұрын
The Carden-Loyd Tankette, arguable the most sucessful tank design. No Joke. You have designs based of it from Great Britain to as far as Japan.
@richardm30235 жыл бұрын
Calling that a tank is like calling a Fiat a Limousine.
@Weisior5 жыл бұрын
@@richardm3023 Technicaly it was a tank goddamit
@olivierr.57525 жыл бұрын
Yea, and in Canada too... which is another country... :)
@Paciat5 жыл бұрын
The first allied tank ace of WWII E. Orlik got his kills on TKS 20 tankette witch was based off Carden-Loyd. But back in the 20s Britain and France were the only designers in the world and Britain was selling to anyone. Thats also why the 6 ton Vickers E was a success.
@stuartparry86162 жыл бұрын
My father used these carriers for reconnaissance during the second front. They also trained on them using what they called ' "fast deployment" whereby a man would ride on the side of the vehicle with a foot on each bogey and they would fumble off when required. This was done in experimental training but was not adopted for action.
@roboaten69315 жыл бұрын
"Without an engine, the thing's absolutely useless." Why do I feel like l have been told off? What an absolute legend.
@gusgone45275 жыл бұрын
Thank you Mr Fletcher for bringing your own unique British style to the world of military vehicles. I salute you!
@nukemman5 жыл бұрын
The Universal Carrier was the "jeep" of tanks!
@traceybest8047 Жыл бұрын
My brother and I rebuilt 3 T-16 Universal Carriers purchased out of Southeastern Equipment in Augusta Georgia. Found there were 2 types of track, 3 types of bogies (solid, straight spokes, curved spokes).They'd do about 35 mph on concrete roads, a little less on grass. What fun! My brother hit a patch of ice on the road and ended up going sideways. Youza! Right hand drive, steering rods, brake rods outside of them. Ex Swiss modifications including these cute little turn signals that popped out as needed.
@minuteman41995 жыл бұрын
A lot of these were used as farm utility vehicles in Canada after the war. You used to see them for sale occasionally into the 80's and 90's.
@AlistairAi5 жыл бұрын
That's adorable
@alcoles96605 жыл бұрын
These long videos are excellent. Some previous Tank Chats episodes were too short and left out so many details. Not to mention that I could listen to Mr. Fletcher talking about water tanks for hours and still be amazed. Thanks to the Tank Museum staff and David Fletcher MBE.
@drbedlam97865 жыл бұрын
Imagine if David Fletcher built a tank..... could we even stop him if he built such a weapon?
@nacho71ar5 жыл бұрын
Great... Now I WANT him to build one...
@drbedlam97865 жыл бұрын
We're talking about a weapon to surpass weapons that surpass Metal Gear here.
@tomb76425 жыл бұрын
Just ask him to tell you all about it. Should keep him busy for a while ;)
@byebye18135 жыл бұрын
But would you want to stop him?
@drbedlam97865 жыл бұрын
Mister, we all know what happens to those who defy Fletcher. Remember that historian who said the Valiant was a good tank? Me neither, and we all know why.
@graemer36572 жыл бұрын
My grandfather drove one of these in the North West Europe campaign. He said the main cargo was usually bringing drinking water and rations forward. He was REME attached to the Highland Light Infantry.
@sneugler5 жыл бұрын
I’ve always loved these and kettenkrads, they’re so fun
@CNMikado4 жыл бұрын
David fletcher thank you so much for dedicating your time to bring us these videos and thank you to all the others at the tank museum for keeping these vehicles alive greetings from Canada 😄
@darrenchard22215 жыл бұрын
“If I listed them all I’d be here all day” . . . Well I’ve made a cup of tea, I’ve sat down I’m ready to hear the list please
@r0guestorm9645 жыл бұрын
Mind if I have a seat next to you? I will gladly give Mr Fletcher all day or as much time as he wants.
@darrenchard22215 жыл бұрын
R0gue Storm I’ll put the kettle back on, tea or coffee?
@axelrajr5 жыл бұрын
very nice. and i could probably sit here all day listening to David Fletcher list all the variations of the Universal Carrier he knows of.
@mrfahrenheit38675 жыл бұрын
I've seen a few on farms in New Zealand back in my youth, I guess they were cheaper than a tractor after the war :)
@alicecooper55333 жыл бұрын
goverment deer cullers used them to get acess into river valleys in in alps
@gunner6785 жыл бұрын
Superb vehicle. A post Great war experimental tank had similar steering, the Johnston light infantry tank, snake tracks!
@mikea6835 жыл бұрын
Sir David:"If you find that you like t.." Me at the top of my voice: "YES I DO DAVID, YES I DO!" Other passengers on the train: :-/
@pencilpauli94423 жыл бұрын
Gotta love the UC My father's first job on leaving school was at the Wolseley factory in Birmingham on the Bren Carrier lines. IIRC Canadian produced vehicles were converted to take the engine used by the British
@elistickband5 жыл бұрын
I once drove that one when I worked at MVEE/FVRDE Chobham. Always wondered what happened to it.
@robertvoss61455 жыл бұрын
A excellent tank chat once again. What a brilliant little workhorse the universal carrier was . So good , even the Germans used captured carriers
@moose25775 жыл бұрын
I see mustache, I click video. It is my purpose.
@logoseven33655 жыл бұрын
Chris You are not alone
@TheCimbrianBull5 жыл бұрын
His mustache is my spirit animal.
@Juhnaaa5 жыл бұрын
You can't be sad watching videos with David talking in them. It's impossible! He always makes me laugh and smile :D
@billb03135 жыл бұрын
I see Fletcher's mustache I click. The tank discussion is just a bonus.
@ronasaurus745 жыл бұрын
I have tried to get into the driver's seat in an Australian made one at Puckapunyal. For the life of me ,I couldn't figure out where my right leg was supposed to go- there just wasn't enough room between the steering wheel and the hull side. Can't fathom how crews spent long hours in them - so much respect!
@Jonahch2v95 жыл бұрын
Canadian War Museum in Ottawa has a flamethrower version. (I think it was called Wasp)
@jetgold5 жыл бұрын
Great video Sir David Fletcher is the best, and this little Universal Carrier was a old plastic model kit for me as a kid way back.
@andrebartels16905 жыл бұрын
8 people are disappointed, that David Fletcher didn't list _all_ the purposes, the universal carrier was put to.
@willwallacetree5 жыл бұрын
My favourite is the one that a Canadian unit in the Netherlands lashed together as an experiment for harassing German positions and pestering sniper nests. It had 15 (maybe 20?) PIATs on a wooden rack, set to fire together in a high arc.
@Hanfgurkenhasser5 жыл бұрын
@@willwallacetree Wtf :D
@willwallacetree5 жыл бұрын
@@Hanfgurkenhasser it's a completely insane concept. Indirect fire gave a range of something like 400 yards, and they'd all drop out of the sky at the same time to cause great excitement. The creature was fired a few times for test purposes, then probably dismantled by somebody sensible. Picture here :) www.bocn.co.uk/vbforum/attachments/1piat.jpg
@SentaDuck4 жыл бұрын
@@willwallacetree Probably dismantled when people started asking questions about where all the PIATs went.
@anthonylee63225 жыл бұрын
My favorite British tracked vehicle. I read once they were not liked in Korea. No reason was given. Better then walking or carrying 100s of pounds of gear . I enjoy David's commentary. He is well informed and speaks well.
@903strikerunit5 жыл бұрын
Did the British tried to shoehorn a tea-maker in this thing?
@Wolvenworks5 жыл бұрын
no. this comes before that, sadly
@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
What do you think the trailer was for. It's full of tea. Got to get your priorities right.
@Trev7945 жыл бұрын
The teas made us never shoehorned in its intrinsic in every British tank design since the mark 4 boiled the gunner and loader
@tomb76425 жыл бұрын
They start with the tea maker then design the vehicle around that, obviously!
@Kevin-mx1vi5 жыл бұрын
I believe it was originally designed as a tea carrier, hence the three compartments in the back (tea, milk, sugar) but they found it could also carry less vital things such as ammunition and other stores. 😉
@Splodge5425 жыл бұрын
I love universal carriers. They look so useful but I didn't know they were fun to drive. I used to hate carrying ammunition boxes in the cadets. They seemed the heaviest most painful objects ever. Much better to have lots of these little beauties doing the heavy lifting.
@johnfisk8115 жыл бұрын
There was no need for one big load bay. Everything that went on was supposed to be portable by two men once unloaded to bring it forward to the battle line.
@michaelmolloy3653 жыл бұрын
I had one here in Australia in the 70's. I stripped most of the armour off it to lighten it up and used it as a beach runner to get to the better surf spots. Brilliant little things and a hell of a lot of fun to go bashing around the sand dunes.
@robertvictor3237 Жыл бұрын
Sand dunes that took hundreds of years to form destroyed in seconds by idiots, good onya
@rokinz32703 жыл бұрын
Um you forgetting New Zealand 🇳🇿. Over 1000 were built and we had never built anything like that
@gurtsmunta14 жыл бұрын
Fabulous talk on my favourite tracked vehicle thank you.
@muchasgracias69765 жыл бұрын
That moustache seems to have grown a David Fletcher!
@marcdavis45093 жыл бұрын
I’ve ridden in a Universal Carrier a few times. It’s pretty nimble and very effective when used properly to bring troops to a relatively safe site to dismount. It was probably best used as a mobile way to call artillery in then scoot. Also for transporting the 3 and 4.2 inch mortars and ammunition
@logoseven33655 жыл бұрын
“The American didn’t like them” The Government, the brass, or the men? Ignore the first two, the third group is all that matters. I bet they liked them.
@Predator42ID5 жыл бұрын
If he said the Americans didn't like them then it was the men. Trust me its usually the stuff that is still loved the bureaucrats hate. I can see why as well, the jeep provided plenty of mobility and firepower without tracks, the Alligaters and Duks were better and overall so much more tolerable.
@demonprinces175 жыл бұрын
Didn't we one called the weisel?
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
The men. The Universal Carriers really weren't a very good vehicle if you were used to White scout cars, halftracks, etc. It was tiny and stupidly... er... inefficiently laid out.
@88porpoise5 жыл бұрын
LogoSeven Probably everyone. Considering the context in which they were used it isn’t surprising. A bunch were being shipped across the Pacific in early December 1941 to equip Canadian troops Hong Kong and the ship pulled into the Philippines because they couldn’t get to their destination when suddenly a large enemy navy was between them and their destination. So they were used by troops with no training or doctrine for them and no maintenance or supply system while facing a much better equipped and prepared enemy and used them in roles they weren’t designed for.
@jamestheotherone7425 жыл бұрын
@@88porpoise A bunch were built in India too. I'm not sure where they went though, mid or far East.
@ethanmyshorts69845 жыл бұрын
Mr Fletcher is the reason I subscribed.
@zxbzxbzxb15 жыл бұрын
Would love to drive one of those to work each day, in summertime at least
@sparky6945 жыл бұрын
Who in the bloody hell would give a thumbs down to David Fletcher!?
@belchnasty5 жыл бұрын
Philistines!
@MrDeadsr5 жыл бұрын
The Germans also used them, they even found some on the eastern front
@gordonhoran43733 жыл бұрын
I think the Canadian army had the highest percentage of these, the Canadian 1st division in Italy used them to great advantage and yes we towed everything with them, they were a very light vehicle with a lot of power and huge drawbar potential, I drove one years ago and really you couldn't have more fun unless you took your clothes off
@lostinpa-dadenduro75555 жыл бұрын
We didn’t like them because of the lack of machine guns. For sure you can get at least four .30 cals and two .50 cals mounted on it. 😀🇺🇸👍
@peterwallace13985 жыл бұрын
A bit like this? natlib.govt.nz/records/22840176?search%5Bi%5D%5Bsubject%5D=New+Zealand.+Army.+2nd+NZEF.+Battalion%2C+28th&search%5Bil%5D%5Bsubject%5D=Universal+carrier+%28Armoured+military+vehicle%29&search%5Bpath%5D=photos&search%5Btext%5D=battalion
@peterwallace13985 жыл бұрын
or this? www.pinterest.nz/pin/708261478870789735/visual-search/?cropSource=6&h=406&w=530&x=15&y=10
@lostinpa-dadenduro75555 жыл бұрын
Peter Wallace That’s the spirit! But surely there can be more. 😀
@michaelmolloy3653 жыл бұрын
They can also carry four people with surf boards, Heaps of beer and steaks as well as any camping gear you need for a surfing weekend where nobody else can get to! lol
@lostinpa-dadenduro75553 жыл бұрын
@@michaelmolloy365 Hmm. Ok it’s starting to grow on me when you explain it like that. 👍
@carabus03545 жыл бұрын
I would sit here all day and listen. Would have been nice to have a tour inside the UC and even see him driving again.
@yellowjackboots26245 жыл бұрын
David Fletcher identifies as a universal carrier. The man's a cultural zeitgeist.
@TheCimbrianBull5 жыл бұрын
So true! 😀
@greybeardp5 жыл бұрын
My father (2/8th Bn, 19th Bde, 6th Div, 2nd AIF) drove one of these in the Middle East and Australia's Northern Territory. By the time the battalion moved from the Territory to Wondecla in North Queensland in June 1943, for conversion to a jungle establishment (i.e., no Carriers), the Carriers were pretty well 'clapped out' and were scheduled for disposal. So, they removed most of the armour and upper works (and governors), and had 'drag races' along the dirt edges of an airstrip. I'm told that it looked like the driver appeared to be perched on top of a fast-moving cloud of dust.