The Chaffee is a very aesthetically pleasing tank.
@jldouglas772 жыл бұрын
I agree. I wish the Sherman had incorporated more sloping and lower profile design features.
@chimichangapoops62442 жыл бұрын
@@jldouglas77 Yeah, however the Sherman has such a memorable profile. They both look properly American.
@totty25242 жыл бұрын
You could've just said that it looks good...
@disbeafakename1672 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it's been my favorite since I saw it for the first time in 'Battle of the Bulge'. Just the sound of it in that movie.
@RawPower72 жыл бұрын
I built a plastic model of when i was a kid, its been one of my favourites since then.
@MrHws5mp3 жыл бұрын
I've never quite put my finger on why, but there is something very 'right' and pleasing about the Chaffee, despite the fact that it's utterly conventional in layout. The 90mm gun in the Norwegian vehicles was the GIAT F2 from the AML-90 armoured car.
@vaclav_fejt3 жыл бұрын
It's efficient. Not as tall as a Sherman, not as long as a T-34. Plus it's a light tank, with a gun substantially more powerful than what its own armour can take. In many movies it was a sort of repacement PzKpfw. III (in grey and with crosses), which, if you squint (and keep squinting), is kind of proportional.
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
I agree, it just looks like a 'modern' tank to me. Very proper, perfect proportions. Also very useful for upgrades.
@BleedingUranium3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, it's definitely one of my favourite tanks aesthetically, it just looks really nice. The other mid/late-war US tank designs had a similar style, like the Pershing or T28/T95, as opposed to the more "bleh" 1930s designs. Interestingly, I feel the same thing happened with US aircraft too.
@MrHws5mp3 жыл бұрын
@@vaclav_fejt It also 'played' Shermans in the Battle Of The Bulge movie, with M-47s played Tiger IIs. The choice of tanks was pretty much dictated by the fact that he movie was made in Spain with the cooperation of the Spanish Army, and that's what they had.
@rdfox763 жыл бұрын
The conventional nature is what makes it so pleasing--the Chaffee, the Pershing/Patton family... if you just say the word "tank," those are the generic image that springs to mind. The proportions are right, they're conventional in layout, and they're simple, purposeful designs where you can see how everything works together to be a good solid machine.
@cboetigphone3 жыл бұрын
I would have to add a 3rd key use of the M-24. When used by the Japanese Self Defense Force against Godzilla. Unfortunately the 75 was not very effective. :) Another excellent overview.
@Venezolano410 Жыл бұрын
😆
@lockon1982 Жыл бұрын
Don't forget the danish monster movie Reptilicus
@ToEuropa Жыл бұрын
Those poor Japanese Self Defense Force tankers being sent against Godzilla. I've always imagined that when the commanders got their orders they yelled back, "Has this _ever_ worked?"
@stevedilucido3060Ай бұрын
@@lockon1982are you a fan of Mystery Science Theater? I assume so if you know Reptilicus
@lockon1982Ай бұрын
@@stevedilucido3060 I see a couple of movies of them, but they cover up the movies
@bryangrote87813 жыл бұрын
Always loved the opening scene in “The Bridge at Remagen” which used these both in the movie and the actual battle. One of the best opening scenes in a movie ever. They drove those Chaffees full out and really showed how those those tanks can move!
@PsilocybinCocktail3 жыл бұрын
It's a terrific opening scene and counterposes the Americans, with tons of motorised and mechanised units, versus the Germans, reduced to chugging along on sluggish trains. And as you say, those Chafees go like stink!
@AbaddonIre2 жыл бұрын
Dang, I was so trying to remember the name of that movie and failed.
@adamlauko44252 жыл бұрын
Just an interesting piece of knowledge: as the movie was filmed in Czechoslovakia in 1968 and East German government did not agree with the way politics was developing in there at that time, their newspapers spread a hoax saying that american forces started to occupy Czechoslovakia - in fact, those "occupation forces" were these tanks needed for the cast...
@ScreechingPossum2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for sharing that 👍 I had never seen that before, and while viewing it a moment ago, I first assumed the footage *must* have been sped up. But then compared to everything else in the shots, I quickly started to appreciate how it was legit.
@dougalbadger49182 жыл бұрын
something that disappointed me but I understand why they didn’t is there weren’t any Pershings or Sherman’s in the movie only greyhounds and Chaffees when I was hoping they’d recreate the part where the Pershings were providing cover fire and go to cross the bridge but realise they’re too heavy so the Sherman’s have to go across leaving the heavy armour behind.
@rexringtail4713 жыл бұрын
"Would be another one here in the front if someone hadn't nicked it" "The Norwegians of all people" I'm dead 😂😂
@kevinwatts733 жыл бұрын
I was laughing so much at the comment of someone nicking the 30mm Browning.
@ShadowDragon86852 жыл бұрын
It really is amazing, how David Fletcher puts on such a perfectly-distinguished, knowledgeable chat... And then in the middle he says "if someone hadn't nicked it," and yes, my sides died laughing, too.
@SporksINTL2 жыл бұрын
as a norwegian we are not sorry edit:Kinda weird we used our version the nm116 until 1972 when we converted 54 of the 123 we had to recon veichels
@shaunvduke2 жыл бұрын
@@SporksINTL unrepentant... that's an outrage!! 👍
@jamesschiller18592 жыл бұрын
I had to play that part back just to be sure he actually said that. Lmao..
@danepatterson81073 жыл бұрын
It really was the pinnacle of 'light tank' design and technology for World War 2. It did literally everything very well and nothing poorly. I don't know if it was expensive compared to M5s or M4s
@genericpersonx3333 жыл бұрын
It was more expensive for sure, but the gained capability over the M3/M5 line made it worth the increase in materials and money. It could go more places at better speed thanks to its wider tracks tied to a better suspension, and the 75mm was capable of destroying any enemy scout vehicles, unlike the 37mm. Its high-explosive shell also was definitely better for engaging the infantry and anti-tank guns that represented the other major problem for scouts. So long as M24 was used a scout, it was indeed the best light tank.
@roadsweeper13 жыл бұрын
@@genericpersonx333 Well, I guess by late ww2, there wasnt much in the way of enemy armour left.... so its main targets would have been anti tank guns and infantry. In which it excelled at.
@anonymousturtle85623 жыл бұрын
Don't take these as authoritative rather than mere guesstimates; but the average cost of a Sherman medium tank was probably around: ~$20,000 in manufacturing the weight in armor, plus $35,000 for everything else Cost of a light M24 Chaffee was probably ~$10,000 in manufacturing the weight in armor, plus $??? in everything else. ____ I can't find actual order prices for Stuarts or Chaffees, or I would have given those...
@michaeldunne3383 жыл бұрын
@@roadsweeper1 I seem to recall reading somewhere that use of high explosives in support of infantry, taking out positions, dealing with things other than armored fighting vehicles made up majority of the work for American tank crews during the conflict. Maybe it was a piece by Steven Zaloga? But, the Americans didn't see much tank vs tank warfare in Italy, nor in the early days of Overlord.
@charles19642 жыл бұрын
@@michaeldunne338 Absolutely, it was all about tactics. The 75mm H.E. was well suited for taking out bunkers and machine gun emplacements in support of infantry. By D-Day the the USAAF had total control of the sky and any German Armored Vehicle that moved during daylight was just asking for it.....
@slamdaddyshapirowo98933 жыл бұрын
There really is nothing wrong with the Chaffee. Incredible vehicle.
@scockery3 жыл бұрын
"Chaffees don't chafe," they said. Okay, they probably didn't.
@timengineman2nd7143 жыл бұрын
I think that, perhaps, the only "flaw" in the Chaffee was kinda like the WW1 Royal Navy Battlecruisers, some idiot heard 75mm cannon and basically wanted a light scout tank to do the duty of a MEDIUM tank!
@MonotoneCreeper3 жыл бұрын
They’re a little big for their role as a light tanks, but not irredeemably.
@TheSchultinator3 жыл бұрын
Eh, lack of a turret basket's pretty glaring, but since everyone had a seat, it's not as big an issue as it could be
@blaster1123 жыл бұрын
@@timengineman2nd714 is it really a flaw? if it did run into some infantry or light-medium tanks it had to deal with it could. Compared to the other guns in service its a very viable gun. It's a lot better as the 37mm used on earlier lights. Using the same ammo as the 75mm shermans saves a lot of logistical hassle as well, compared to for instance using a british 6 pounder. For a light tank however it was tough having a decent amount of effective armor for its weight. The way it was build did allow it to fight if needed, sometimes an assault comes your way or a unit needs quick support. Better to have the gun to do the job in those situations, even if they don't appear very frequently. In terms of size it's not that much larger as the M3 and M5 stuarts either. Its 5.56m long (with gun) compared to the M5's (4.62m), 3m vs 2.39m wide, 2.77m vs 2.33m tall. So yeah its about 20% larger as its predecessor, but much more lethal. If it has any flaws its that the engine is weaker as the M5 while being heavier (18.4 tons with 220hp vs 16.5 tons 296hp, although things like the transmission can still make it more mobile).
@paulkirkland32633 жыл бұрын
There's still at least one M-24 at Dien Bien Phu, forming part of a memorial to the battle. It was remarkable how they were transported in pieces and reassembled in the field. Great tank!
@DonWan473 жыл бұрын
In 2007 this wonderful man took my detachment on a tour of the Tank Museum. One of my favourite memories in uniform. Knew everything and loved talking about tanks.
@AmericaLexicon2 жыл бұрын
KZbin is at its best helping keep these stories alive.
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
"it had the same main armament as the Mitchell Bomber" seems dropping bombs from a tank might be problematic, to me...
@scockery3 жыл бұрын
Not as easy as dropping Mitchells from an airplane.
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
@@scockery I see you know Mitchell.
@Brave_Sir_Robin3 жыл бұрын
Please tell me if this is a joke but he was referring to the 75mm on the Mitchell
@TheSchultinator3 жыл бұрын
@@Brave_Sir_Robin This was indeed meant as a joke, no worries
The M24 Chaffee is my second favorite tank right after the M41 Walker Bulldog.
@hunterjarman47283 жыл бұрын
I love the m41 bulldog too :)
@Panzer4F23 жыл бұрын
Tamiya has a 1:35 scale plastic model of the M-41. It's a basic kit, but really shows the sleek lines and details.
@hunterjarman47283 жыл бұрын
I have it and love it 😊
@Paladin18733 жыл бұрын
@@Panzer4F2 I've seen it at Hobby Lobby, but my modeling days are over.
@XanderMan77-np1ln Жыл бұрын
Yes! Bulldog needs some love!
@WildBillCox133 жыл бұрын
The Japanese self defense force was a major recipient of M24 based combat vehicles after the war. I've seen footage of Japanese Chaffees and their M19 "Paleo-Duster" cousins on several occasions. Something perhaps worthy of mentioning is the Chaffee spawning a whole combat vehicle family. The M37HMC (a mini-Priest), the M38 Mortar Carrier (for the 4.2"), the M19MGMC (twin Bofors guns . . . I mean, who wouldn't?), the T77 (armed with 6x .50cal MGs), and the T41/M39 ACV/APC. Of these, the Chaffee and the M19 saw quite a bit of service. The idea behind the Combat Vehicle Family is the ease of maintenance and logistics earned from the use of a single basic chassis and drive train.
@WildBillCox133 жыл бұрын
We ignored the 75mm gun M7 Light/Medium, waiting two more years for the "right tank" which arrived too late for real duty in the war as a result. I'd've rather had M7s in '43 than all the Chaffees in the world in '45.
@dieselelectricrazor3773 жыл бұрын
pretty common to see the JSDF M24 Chaffees in early Showa era Toho Kaiju films tbh
@WildBillCox133 жыл бұрын
@@dieselelectricrazor377 Yeah. I'm an old "Gojira" fan.
@tacomas96023 жыл бұрын
Wow that twin Bofors sounds AWESOME.
@KMac3293 жыл бұрын
The Chaffee is a gem of a tank, and this is a gem of a tank chat. Thank you, Mr. Fletcher!
@Vrelk3 жыл бұрын
Thanks again, Mr. Fletcher. Cheers.
@JohnoO_O_3 жыл бұрын
I always think of the movie "Battle of the Bulge" when I see this tank. Exceptionally well designed vehicle
@itatane3 жыл бұрын
I'm one of the fortunate few outside of the military and historians to have heard of Adna Chaffee. My family is from Orwell, Ohio (Chaffee's family hometown) and the village park is named after him. For being the middle of nowhere, Ashtabula County sure spawned some colourful figures.
@MrJweastma2 жыл бұрын
I live in Ashtabula small world...Any idea whatever happened to the Sherman that was parked outside of the NG Armory?
@ApacheSenior3 жыл бұрын
A museum near where I grew up in Norway has one of these on display next to the highway. Always nice to see it when driving by.
@yoshineitor3 жыл бұрын
I love this channel, it reminds me of how HUGE tanks are, look at the size of these "light tanks". It also teaches the true story of tanks, reminding us that a lot of tanks were designed for fighting troops and not other tanks.
@SlavicCelery2 жыл бұрын
Chaffees are genuinely smaller than you'd expect standing next to them. There's an outdoor tank park/museum at Cantigny Park for the Big Red One. And they got WW1 - modern units there. The man with the mustache is pretty pint sized.
@6perk3 жыл бұрын
One of them still stands at the gate of a Norwegian army base today. It was picked up and shipped by trailer as part of the huge NATO exersize in 2018. We used a Chaffee and a WW2 german panser 3 of all things. I had time to go into both of them. They both stay outside, and not kept as nice as you guys do at Bovington sadly. I have always hoped they could display the old stuff. That can help pay for some of the work needed to preserve them better.
@ihcfn3 жыл бұрын
High praise indeed from David Fletcher!
@JTA19612 жыл бұрын
G00D point.
@okrajoe3 жыл бұрын
Always thought the M24 was a sleek-looking tank
@gabbz45403 жыл бұрын
I snapped a picture of a modernized Chaffee standing outside the defence museum at Akershus festning (fortress) in Oslo. Really cool seing old and new fused together
@derekmills10803 жыл бұрын
' ..... but the Norwegians weren't really fighting anybody .....' classic David. Another enjoyable 'chat'. Thank you.
@MrKeys573 жыл бұрын
Norway was occupied by Germany, and they bravely fought for their country, but loss many good men, the Norwegian resistence movement (incl.SAS) also contributed to slow down/stop Hitlers acces to "heavy water" to make the atombomb.
@derekmills10803 жыл бұрын
@@MrKeys57 I knew that. It was David's remark off the cuff that was curious.
@MrKeys573 жыл бұрын
@@derekmills1080 AND the coward sweden did contribute to over 10000 Norwegians soldiers death, this you did propably not know, -- i am a Finn, and both my parents did participate in WW2, not as refuges, - but both at the front, hence my interest in war history, Levi
@derekmills10803 жыл бұрын
@@MrKeys57 dear Levi, I've always been puzzled how endless documentaries brush Sweden's behaviour in WWII aside. Incidentally, I have a particular interest in this channel in that my late father was in the Royal Armoured Corps in WWII. Fighting in Sherman tanks in N Africa and Italy. He didn't say much about his horrendous experiences, but luckily escaped his tank being knocked out soon after crossing the Rapido over Amazon Bridge in the Cassino battle. I have a picture of him in front of his later marque Sherman with the American 3" or 76.2mm gun (with enhanced frontal armour as a casting - there aren't the usual bolts to be seen as on M3 and early M4 tanks) described by David in an earlier 'chat'. After victory in Europe, his unit was disbanded and he served in various areas in Europe but never, ever talked about what he saw there. Derek
@derekmills10803 жыл бұрын
@@MrKeys57 I forgot to mention his unit: 2nd Lothians and Border Horse, B Squadron.
@55vma3 жыл бұрын
Great! You found the cache of the Australian War Memorial films. 🇦🇺🐨🇦🇺
@quadcannon3 жыл бұрын
I love Mr. Fletcher. He's a gem.
@Philtopy2 жыл бұрын
In my opinion this is hands down the most beautiful and well designed tank. It looks appealing, yet efficient. It is fast, but also packs a punch.
@klenner2 жыл бұрын
Ahhh Mr.Fletcher thank you for you apperance!
@jeidustry2 жыл бұрын
"between 18 and 20 tons" *Depending on whether or not you're American or British I took it both ways as you talking about the different measurements of tons and the different weights of the crew 😭
@JTA19615 ай бұрын
Good one...tanks for the observation
@bigmandrel11 ай бұрын
What a human being! Such a sweet & sour wit that lands so tellingly yet lightly.
@ncrveteranranger35593 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love this thing. Idk what it is about the Chaffee but it's just so pleasing to look at
@CAARaeed2 жыл бұрын
These liberated my country. It's the most iconic tank in all the grainy archive war footage we saw growing up. I think I've been programmed to find it aesthetically pleasing in its lines and proportions
@StealthySpace73 жыл бұрын
I have been waiting for this video, and the fact that my favorite mustache man it’s the chap to deliver it makes it sweeter
@chestercallahan88563 жыл бұрын
Can't get enough of tank chat!
@TheDiner503 жыл бұрын
Except that there is 3 dam ad brakes baked into the videos now. To the point of not wanting to watch or give them a dime. Charity should not be begged for every 10 (or in this case 5) minutes.
@crabhuman Жыл бұрын
I absolutely adore this man.
@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab3 жыл бұрын
Love this tank, my favourite US WW2 tank ever since I saw 'The Bridge at Remagen'. Good vid, as usual. Thanks.👍🏻
@brentlabeau3 жыл бұрын
American’s are glad you named our tanks. We keep the names you called them and started doing the same from WW 2 and beyond.
@JTA19615 ай бұрын
& planes...Catalina...
@leehopkinson68242 жыл бұрын
Mr D Fletcher is never allowed to retire at any time or any reason. He is after all Mr Bovington. Many thanks David. Please keep adding more and more
@iambiggus3 жыл бұрын
Thank you as always sir for the excellent presentation.
@FoxtrotYouniform2 жыл бұрын
As an aside, I'm thrilled to see that the museum has so fully embraced their online fame and are giving people opportunities to support the collection in so many ways.
@patrav55423 ай бұрын
I like this tamk, it is very well thought thuru. Also very nice design. The hydromatic is awsome for its time.
@rontonkin77512 жыл бұрын
My grandfather drove a Chafee in France and Germany, left me with some great stories. M24 holds a special place for me.
@seavpal Жыл бұрын
Absolutely gorgeous machine, one of the most beautiful (in my opinion). 😍
@fatihonal62732 жыл бұрын
Love the look of the Chaffee! Such beautiful design 😍
@conradealie93042 жыл бұрын
Another great tank chat hosted by David Fletcher.
@loupiscanis94493 жыл бұрын
Thank you , Mr Fletcher
@AdamMGTF3 жыл бұрын
Production value has increased substantially, it's subtle but wow. I've enjoyed these chats since some of the very earliest. They just get better. I noticed you've taken other people's comments about editing in "adverts" for the shop/patreon as well. They fit in perfectly now and the cuts to diagrams/the parts of the tank that Mr Fletcher talks about are as good as (probably better than) anything I'd ever seen back in the hayday of educational TV.
@headshot69593 жыл бұрын
I put up a comment asking the purpose of the large removable hatch at the front, two kind people explained it was for access to the gearbox; yet that comment was removed somehow. I even paid tribute to Fletcher's epic moustache! I'd like to thank Nick Turner and Chris Long for explaining it to me.
@derin1112 жыл бұрын
Looks like a lovely smooth ride. I wouldn't mind one as my daily driver for doing the weekly shop! 🙂
@paweszymonjasinski71583 жыл бұрын
Super cool small tank. Thank You so much for this video!
@floydvaughn8363 жыл бұрын
Thank you for mentioning the French users. I remember a photo of Group Mobile 100 with M 24 tanks in a convoy. The M 24 tanks also were featured in The Bridge at Remagen movie. Were they Yugoslavian Army? I bet yes, as I'd find it hard to believe that Hollywood would fly tanks to Europe.
@mflem2993 жыл бұрын
Adna Romanza Chaffee Jr. (September 23, 1884 - August 22, 1941) was an officer in the United States Army, called the "Father of the Armored Force" for his role in developing the U.S. Army's tank forces. There’s a Fort Chaffee in the state of Arkansas named in his honor.
@carlbyronthompson3 жыл бұрын
LOVE David.
@CyberZayne3 жыл бұрын
My favorite WW2 US tank. Thank you so much for talking about it!
@robertvoss61453 жыл бұрын
I've always liked the M24 Chaffee , it just looks right . Plus i have always loved the film 'the bridge at Remagen' . I can't look at the M24 and not think of the opening scene where the American forces are racing to capture a bridge .
@michaeldunne3383 жыл бұрын
The lunge for the Oberkassel bridge? Some great shots of the column moving at apparently rather rapid speeds: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5PZep2PoZ6Gi5Y
@brentsmith56472 жыл бұрын
Brilliant man ❤️👀👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
@JoeyNYSDnomad2 жыл бұрын
You are very knowledgeable and entertaining.
@jasonz77883 жыл бұрын
Thank you gentleman for the great work
@henke78643 жыл бұрын
The M24 Chaffee is one of my favorite tanks from WW2. And i love the Norwegian upgraded one. Same goes for the Chilean upgraded M24. Armed with 60 mm HVMS gun.
@matthewJC19903 жыл бұрын
Love your tank chats
@eskhawk3 жыл бұрын
Adna Chaffee Jr was the first Chief of the armor Branch (before this time the US Army had both cavalry tanks and infantry tank units)...His father commanded the US forces during The Boxer Rebellion...
@Geoduck.3 жыл бұрын
Not far from our home is a small National Guard Station. A well cared for Chaffee is the proud entrance sentinel.
@Oivindjensen3 жыл бұрын
We had one on display at our base when i was in the Norwegian army.
@raymowery51222 жыл бұрын
(1) I understand that the 75 had a "concentric recoil system" in the Mitchell B25 bomber, giving it a much shorter recoil. This allowed it to operate within this relatively small tank turret. (2) The lack of a "turret basket" inside also allowed for more ammunition storage - usually asking for 70 rounds in most tanks. (3) The US armored divisions had battalions of 3 Sherman companies of 17 tanks and one company of M5 Stuarts. The Stuarts at the time of the arrival of the Chaffee were used mostly for rear-area liaison missions, held away from the chance of an encounter with German armor. When the Stuart tankers got the Chaffee, then went all-out to the front, with a chance to compete using speed, agility, and a good gun.
@420glass3 жыл бұрын
Just love this ole dude
@Subzero21512 жыл бұрын
Great little tank
@1987phillybilly2 жыл бұрын
This was a good one, always wanted to know a little more about the Chaffe
@johnberryhill81063 жыл бұрын
Sadly, in the mid 70's, I remember shooting at these tanks as hard targets while stationed in W.Germany.
@genericpersonx3333 жыл бұрын
Hey, still serving a role. A tank is a tool of war, not an aesthetic piece of art, and as long as we have some examples of a tank available for tank developers to reference so they can make better tanks, I am not heart-broken if most of its fellows end their days training new soldiers. Better that than being scrapped to make razor blades or other trivial product.
@Cramblit2 жыл бұрын
@@genericpersonx333 That being said, I really wish these vehicles were saved and restored more, and not just from WWII, but other wars as well. It's an era that is fascinating, and it's sad so many vehicles simply don't exist anymore except in film. It would be great education for both school children, and hands on visual learning for upcoming engineers, and of course history buffs to truly see the differences, and advancements, pro's con's, and how lessons were learned, and being able to see these vehicles in person, and really compare them would be a huge benefit, and awesome thing.
@cptnkrenon3 жыл бұрын
Easily one of the best looking WWII tanks. Genuinely surprised to hear that they had a 5 man crew!
@williamsample26313 жыл бұрын
That one surprise me to
@Silverhks2 жыл бұрын
Basically a US requirement. All tanks had to have a bow machinegun. If you have that gun you need 5 crew. This combined with the minimum shell requirement (I think of 90 rounds) was one of the delays in deploying the M26 Pershing. The development board could fit the ammo or the bow gunner but not both in the tank.
@averagebuffaloresident.54883 жыл бұрын
My boy finally got covered
@halflifeapc87773 жыл бұрын
Excellent work
@gabbarrf17453 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the 17pdr challenger footage.
@MisteriosGloriosos9223 жыл бұрын
*VERY informative...Thanks for share!!!*
@ThinkingFingers3 жыл бұрын
I love the Chaffee. It's cool knowing it really was a good vehicle. Can't believe the Norwegians used it all the way into the 90's. That's pretty nuts.
@PsilocybinCocktail3 жыл бұрын
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just give it a much bigger gun.
@feedingravens3 жыл бұрын
The most viewed Chaffee will be the one in "Don Camillo and Peppone", the tank they supposedly hid since WW II in a barn.
@thatfriggingbathroom26563 жыл бұрын
I do remember that scene but haven't seen it in ~30 years, not knowing much about tanks back then and always kind of thought it was just a Sherman
@feedingravens3 жыл бұрын
@@thatfriggingbathroom2656 Just rechecked, it is a Chaffee. The wheels betrayed it. I got the DVD's, for me this is the perfect comedy, nostalgic and reminds me of my childhood, my parents and all. I regularly start crying... Another thing I looked up: It could play everywhere (well, everywhere in the Po delta), but in the movie you can see the name of the village. So I checked - yes, that is the real name! And it still looks the same, there is a site where a guy literally looked for all the sites in the movie. This market place with the church looks IDENTICAL, he found the place where Don Camillo went swimming, and so on. I am almost tempted to go there myself, is not so far away from me, after all. I can only recommend to watch it again. I can imagine you will have similiar feelings.
@jtoddjb3 жыл бұрын
one of my favorite tanks. Seems to be able to do a little of everything
@VosperCDN3 жыл бұрын
This, the M3 and M5 (or the British equivalent) are some of my favourites when it comes to the smaller, less glamorous tanks of WWII. (PS - saw this first time it was uploaded, couldn't comment in time before it was pulled)
@rileyernst9086 Жыл бұрын
Noticed the footage from the Australian war memorial. Australia trialled these tabks in late 44 and 45 and found that the automatic gearbox was not suited to jungle warfare. It'd be hunting a gear whilst you're trying to do slow work.
@haywoodyoudome3 жыл бұрын
I like how he starts to ramble, realizes it, and stumbles back on script.
@MrDgwphotos3 жыл бұрын
ARVN used them during the Vietnam war, too. Because of their participation in some of the coups within the South Vietnamese government, they were known as "Voting machines."
@600joe3 жыл бұрын
IF THERES A BOBBLE HEAD OF MR FLETCHER IN THE TANK MUSEUM STORE, IM BUYING ONE. IF NOT THEY NEED TO MAKE ONE.
@MrDaniel-West19709 ай бұрын
Uruguay ( Uruguayan Army ) used the M24 Chafee with notable success until 2018, with good maintenance, repowering its communications equipment and diesel engines.
@TheDivinepromise3 жыл бұрын
I spent hundreds of time playing as a chaffee in WoT… Love to see this vid…
@ralphnicolailatorena11513 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@tor66843 жыл бұрын
Just saw the notification, but I'm pretty busy right now. Though, as it's David Fletcher MBE, I immediately clicked Like... and then I can actually watch it a slightly better time.
@Rhubba3 жыл бұрын
Quite the mover as well as witnessed at the start of the movie Bridge At Remargen and sliding around corners in The Day The Earth Stood Still.
@SteamCrane2 жыл бұрын
What a beauty!
@gabrielpacana85969 ай бұрын
The Stuart and Chaffee look worlds apart from each other. The former is typical of the interwar period, whereas the Chaffee already has that Cold War look. Beautiful tank.
@FiveTwoSevenTHR3 жыл бұрын
The Chaffee is one of my favorite tanks. It's a lot of fun to use in War Thunder.
@patton33383 жыл бұрын
"It only weighs between 18 - 20 Tons. Depending on, really, if you're British or American. I suppose." Savage.
@StaffordMagnus3 жыл бұрын
I don't think that was a crack at Americans, just that US tons are lighter than UK Imperial Tons.
@kenbrown28083 жыл бұрын
@@StaffordMagnus and it doesn't answer the question people in the UK don't say £2240 is a ton of money.
@JohnyG293 жыл бұрын
I do.
@shawnmiller47813 жыл бұрын
Two people separated by a common language
@gunner6783 жыл бұрын
There is a difference between US tons and British tons and of course the metric tonne.
@mortensandmoen52083 жыл бұрын
I remember them when I was in the army in 1985! And the M48 diesel.
@jerdasaurusrex5573 жыл бұрын
I dare say this tank is one of the most tank tank I've ever seen.
@BigBellyEd3 жыл бұрын
Love the Chaffee. It looks way more modern than WW2. Especially the suspension looks so similar up to the M60 tank.
@AyebeeMk23 жыл бұрын
just what I thought.
@poekielover93043 жыл бұрын
Ah, look who's here! My favorite tank!!
@nriqueog3 жыл бұрын
Would love to see you guys or the Chieftain do a vid on the Norwegian 90mm Chaffee.
@billevans79363 жыл бұрын
Awesome.....as always..
@garyowens74543 жыл бұрын
Of all WWII American tanks, this is my favorite. I must have put together 9 or 10 model kits of the M24 over the years in 1/35 scale, and this year have undertaken building one in 1/6 scale. For anyone who collects vintage 1960s G.I. Joe or Action Man, I think you can work out why I decided to do this. A tank commander shouldn't be standing around next to a huge jade-green radio set all day, he should be tearing around the back yard in style!
@christianvik3400 Жыл бұрын
The M-24 Chaffee in Norway was used for airfield defences against potential airborne Warzaw forces.