A Short Campaign of Great Consequence

Рет қаралды 6,780

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 23

@josephwurzer4366 3 ай бұрын

A gem of a 2 volumes study. Don’t ignore volume 1. The look at first will be my gosh what thick & Dense tomes. Just start reading. You will be amazed. Just enough maps and the story flows well.

@sparkey6746 2 ай бұрын

Enjoyed this presentation, thank you.

@spiffinz 3 ай бұрын

It wouldn't be an army presentation without audio issues..

@K_Type 3 ай бұрын

Love Scott. Remember seeing him on those civil war shows from the 90’s and 2000’s, and he had no trouble getting chicks in his early days I am sure

@anselmdanker9519 3 ай бұрын

Thank you for this presentation. I learned a lot .😊

@clarkbuckner4900 3 ай бұрын

No one mentions Joseph Harsh 's books anymore. Maybe because he focuses on Lee and the Confederates.

@Edward-kk4dl 2 ай бұрын

Edward c barrow Ann Coulter laura ingraham ❤❤❤❤ good job

@Edward-kk4dl 2 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤❤ edward

@richardthomas598 2 ай бұрын

No, the ANV could not have been destroyed at Sharpsburg. Civil War armies were incredibly durable (the infantry point is sound, but not the entire story) and no major field army collapsed during the war until 1865. Morale had to utterly fail to achieve that result. Any move that might have gained a cauldron-like advantage would have merely prompted a retreat. Lee could have been smashed harder. He could have been forced to retreat (which, as described, would have been terrible for him). But not destroyed, not anymore than McClellan, Hooker or Meade could have been destroyed.

@carywest9256 18 күн бұрын

Sharpsburg! 4th. Texas lnf.Regt. Co.K-Henderson County

@Hotrichard 2 ай бұрын

Bro said "Lee will go number two"

@phil20_20 3 ай бұрын

The South started the war over slavery. People take the North's point of view when they say it wasn't over slavery but over-all it began over slavery in the new territories. Lincoln merely took advantage of the cause.

@steventhompson399 2 ай бұрын

I've known people who still insist it was the south defending their states and states rights from an aggressive oppressive north, they still don't want to acknowledge how central slavery was to the whole thing lol

@Pancito49 2 ай бұрын

You need to dig down deeper in research. State Rights, not slavery

@FlameQwert 2 ай бұрын

@@Pancito49 states right to do what exactly

@howardclegg6497 2 ай бұрын

@@FlameQwertLeave the Union...it matters little why. The States are soverign and they could just do it. Since they were dragged back into the union by the sword, the Republic died and we became a forced Nation State. The founders warned us that tyrants such as Lincoln would try to do what he did.

@Robert-g3l1v 2 ай бұрын

Slavery was the cause but it was the idea of states rights. Very similar as the abortion issue, gun rights, or the immigration issue. The South leans to the right on all these issues

@K_Type 3 ай бұрын

LFG

@InnovateAd-Solutions 3 ай бұрын

Hello The USAHEC, our team has been impressed with your channel and we'd like to offer you an advertising opportunity. Let's discuss how we can collaborate!