The pixel race has been over for many years. People no longer buy cameras based on MP.
@Aragorn78847 ай бұрын
Spoiler Alert: No.
@jaughnekow7 ай бұрын
no. nice camera though.
@WarChortle7 ай бұрын
The fact a digital back can be used on older film Hasselblad's is very cool.
@hRt42kuo7jTtmk147 ай бұрын
@@WarChortle that is cool, but that option has been around for 20+ years and this piece isn't that.
@domramsey7 ай бұрын
Becca totally brings this camera to life with words. I think watching her videos must be a little like the feeling you get taking photos with a Hasselblad.
@irvb98817 ай бұрын
Beautiful - not the Hasselblad (it is), or the images (they are) - but Becca's reviews for The Verge. Wonderful stuff.
@stephenlee26657 ай бұрын
Bekka's passion in shooting has totally grabbed my attention, even though i am not a pro photographer.😂
@Addladdadd7 ай бұрын
Becca is killin it as allways❤
@ErikN17 ай бұрын
When the 907x was first announced I knew I wanted one. It fits my style of photography perfectly. I still have to work on the budget but I’m happy they are keeping it around. Thanks Becca for a great review as always!
@Thisath1007 ай бұрын
excellent video! these hasselblad cameras always get me - i am enchanted by the emotional resonance of the colour reproduction, and the way they really seem like memories. your videos always play well into that, and i think its silly to not appreciate your brilliant photography too, Becca.
@shunpillay7 ай бұрын
“Photos from this camera feel like memories frozen in time - pulled right out of my eyeballs.” “It will make you see the world differently.” Don’t think I’ve ever heard higher praise for a camera. Loved this review. Now I want one! 😅
@MrSerotoninman7 ай бұрын
give me a Hasselblad, and I shall move the world
@Zetaphotography7 ай бұрын
Exactly not a worthy person to do a review on this
@FeRoOOo717 ай бұрын
the only thing you will shoot is flowers, trees and traffic signs, waste of 8k camera
@hRt42kuo7jTtmk147 ай бұрын
Most people who move the world do it without a Hasselblad.
@realavx7 ай бұрын
Just a camera brah.
@IndoTitus_Pullo6 ай бұрын
and maybe a place to stand too ? 😅
@marcowolffphotography7 ай бұрын
I just love the way you do reviews. It’s very emotional, I can feel what this camera lifts you. Thank you for this ❤
@The_Hero_Is_Back7 ай бұрын
I love the black leatherette and chrome highlights. If Batman had a camera, it would be one of these. Based on what I paid for a Nikon D2X recently, I’ll be able to afford one of these Hasselblads in maybe 20-30 years. Admittedly I’ll be in my nineties by then, but I can wait. I’m patient. Good review, Becca.
@kgvertu6 ай бұрын
Another fantastic review watched by so many that dont even own a camera they just want to hear you talk about them. I can see the buttery images though my screen. Incredible pieces of tech.
@k-cАй бұрын
I think it is the special input of the photographer than the equipment, so you did a good job.
@bittiapina7 ай бұрын
Thanks for a fantastic review! I watched a few others but your review was just next level. Such good sample photos and explaining how the camera works and how it's different from what's out there in the market. Hasselblad cameras have always been a dream of mine to use but unfortunately they're way out of my price range. I could save up for one but considering I'd be too scared to use it in fear of breaking it, it's just not worth the hassle (hehehe). Still, really glad there are brands out there that do their own thing and continue to create unique devices that aren't the same as everyone else's products. Unfortunately you usually have to pay a huge price for that kind of unique design. Anyway, you keep being my absolutely favorite gear reviewer because when you review something you REVIEW it proper and with a very cool personal touch. Thanks for this!
@PratyushTewari6 ай бұрын
Your reviews are so real and from the heart. I wish verge had a channel or playlist of just your videos that I could subscribe.
@ironcrafter547 ай бұрын
The excitement I experience when I see a new Full Frame episode in my feed..
@ThinkingCap_7 ай бұрын
Not into cameras and this was just such an amazing deep dive by her. Really impressed by the editing and narration and I ended up learning so much about something I know nothing about!
@bismarchiavelli7 ай бұрын
Those pictures are beautiful
@mostlymushroom7 ай бұрын
What a great sentiment to get across, thank you for this awsome video.
@iloverendering7 ай бұрын
Great video! Another difference between the 50c and the 100c is the hot shoe attachment.
@Zetaphotography7 ай бұрын
Not a good review. It’s for clicks since this is a hot release
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
@@Zetaphotography probably sponsored like all the other ones released today
@ZsoltVajda6 ай бұрын
Becca's reviews are so sooo gooood. she knows what she's talking about, elegantly worded, well shot
@daultonvenglar99057 ай бұрын
Not a single mention of being able to use it with old Hasselblad film bodies?! That’s like the entire reason this camera exists.
@ryanyep16 ай бұрын
actually shocked that she didn't mention this point
@KeeeeenW7 ай бұрын
Your photos look awesome! Thanks for the review! The best part about the new CFV 100C is that the price of CFV 50c is going to go down (hopefully) enough that I can finally buy one for my Hasselblad 500CM (yes, you can use the CFV back for a 30-year-old film camera).
@Chris-ey7zy6 ай бұрын
And be able to use flash
@AchanCover7 ай бұрын
Great review! There's a question I've always had about medium format like Hasselblad though: I guess the main advantage of the system comes from the larger sensor (around 1.3x that of full frame), which supposedly comes with better bokeh and allows higher ISO at the same noise level. However, I see that most Hasselblad lens actually have smaller aperture (usually F2.5, sometimes F1.9 at most) than full frame (which can go up to F1.4 or even F1.2 on mass-production lens). Wouldn't that actually cancel out the advantage of the sensor? For instance a F1.9 lens on Hasselblad would theoretically have similar bokeh and low-light performance as a F1.4 lens on a full frame camera. Does that mean the main advantages would only be better color science and more pixel count?
@andyvan56927 ай бұрын
NO, you miss one point, as the sensor gets bigger depth of field gets SMALLER, so for any given f-number the dof is thinner; in Hasselblads case, Also in LF to, the max is normally f-5.6 or f-11 {LF}, or f-2.8/2 for these mf's, as to focus it it would be IMPOSSIBLE if you had a 1.4 or 0.95 like in the Leica Noctalux lenses, as the dof is even thinner than that!! so, to allow the focus system to cope, and YOU, via manual focus (500c\m's, etc) the aperture max is limited to f-2.0; but the main point is this dof allows for excellent subject isolation, as the edges are soft, or crisp (f-no# dependent), which is why magazines like vouge, etc. use them for their 'spreads'. but if you want to see this affect at max, look into LF photography, esp. model shoots in studio, then this "excellent" subject isolation morphs into mind-blowing!!!
@AchanCover7 ай бұрын
@@andyvan5692 Thanks for the reply. Hmm, I'm not sure if I'm getting the point you're making though. I guess that's what I meant, right? The bigger the sensor, the *shallower* the DoF becomes (so more bokeh and separation), but that's only up to a scaling factor of 1.3x for medium format vs full frame, so say F2 actually gets divided by the factor and has equivalent DoF as full frame F1.5 (just like F2 for APSC sensor is multiplied by a factor of 1.5x and has equivalent DoF of full frame F3), but even so, full frame F1.4 or F1.2 would still have shallower DoF than a medium format F2, at least theoretically, which is why I'm wondering if medium format actually has an advantage in bokeh (and low-light), since it has a larger sensor, but usually smaller aperture in lens.
@almostinfamous427 ай бұрын
For a fixed subject distance, focal length and aperture, the depth of Field remains the same regardless of format. What changes is the area of capture. As you go from larger to smaller formats you are effectively cropping the image in a optical way.
@AchanCover7 ай бұрын
@@almostinfamous42 Yes you're right. I guess what I meant is that standing at the same object distance and using different focal lengths (say F2 50mm on full frame and F2 65mm on Medium Format) creates the same field of view, but the same F2 on Medium Format has about 1.3x more bokeh than F2 on full frame (simply because its physical focal length is 1.3x larger), thus the concept of "equivalent focal length" and "equivalent aperture". However, what I'm saying is that if I simply use a F1.4 50mm lens on full frame instead, it will likely output a similar viewing angle image and create the same bokeh as F2 65mm on Medium Format (which is close to the largest aperture a Hasselblad system can get, but a full frame system can get to F1.2 for a reasonable price or even F0.95 in rare cases), so in a way the advantage of the larger sensor is cancelled out by the smaller aperture, at least in terms of bokeh (of course, you still get more pixel count and better color science, but that's another story).
@steveasher92397 ай бұрын
Thanks. You've reminded me of the good old film days. When I actually thought out each shot. And now I'm back with Kodachrome 64, my own darkroom, the custom lab within walking distance of my apartment. Guess I'm going to pull out some of my saved work.
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
I still mostly shoot film, 10/10 would still recommend :D
@ziggyziggyz17563 ай бұрын
This is essence of photography in this broken ,,Z, R, ect."" plastic camera world. Your first few words about shooting with this camera perfectly capture the spirit of this equipment. "Some slower, some dreamer..." :)
@shtrier6 ай бұрын
I'm not really into photography, but thank you for this video! The interactions and thoughts going in to this camera makes me so happy, and if it wasn't for the price I would probably buy it right away
@LoyalSlime7 ай бұрын
Answer: Nothing. It's no better than any other full frame camera mirrorless camera out there.
@nickthaskater7 ай бұрын
It's medium format
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
@@nickthaskaterit's a baby medium format, still a big crop compared to many digital backs. But I would disagree with @LoyalSlime - it's better than full frame cameras for some specific use cases. I for one like vintage portrait lenses and some of them cover the 44x33mm sensor size with no issues, making them even more amazing than they were originally designed to be. People talk about megapixels too much, forgetting that there's over 100 years worth of lenses that can be used on mirrorless cameras, not just the latest stuff.
@draughonc7 ай бұрын
Love this form factor. Almost bought the 50c last month. Didn’t know this was coming
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
Form factor is amazing and gorgeous. Just wish they didn't push megapixels, but bigger size sensors. This is still very much a cropped angle of view compared to the Hasselblads of old with 56x56mm images.
@memofromessex7 ай бұрын
That looks extraordinarily difficult to use and it looks easy to drop. And then there's no image stabilisation. And nothing to hold it with. And easy to grab of someone. What exactly are you paying for?
@ericcarabetta11617 ай бұрын
The name.
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
The vibe. The feels. The nostalgia. The megapixels. The design. But really - in my book the "mini" Hasselblads and Fuji GFXs fill an interesting niche - of using vintage portrait lenses beyond their official use. Lots of old lenses cover the bigger than "full frame" sensor and can get amazing results in an artists hand. Otherwise it's like with every technology, expensive cars, expensive watches, expensive phones, expensive clothes, expensive jewelry, it's mostly for show.
@tjpurba96 ай бұрын
One day I’ll be out there freezing the moment with a medium format camera. One day.
@chuckz29347 ай бұрын
Great content and one of the best presenters on YT
@yoki97436 ай бұрын
skipped over here from your channel becca.... love your work on both channels.... being a A7C owner your thoughts etc have been really informative... now just have to save the money for this new camera you are "playing with".... thanks yoki..
@maxix5457 ай бұрын
Becca really draws you into photography unlike any other tech reviewer, even if you are not deeply invested on it. Her feelings and thoughts about the piece of technology she is talking about come clear throughout the video. Great stuff, Becca.
@ideatorx7 ай бұрын
The photos on my ultrafine display in 4K are just spectacular. oh my dear lord.
@Lab-Rat6 ай бұрын
The images for food photography or pet photography and of course people photography just dreamy
@FrancoDFernando6 ай бұрын
No one going to mention how the photos she took are genuinely good photos?
@youngien7 ай бұрын
Having today's technology that work with something that was created almost 100 years ago is something that is extremely rare and magical.
@WilliamCheangSingapore4 ай бұрын
Totally agreed. How nice too it would be Rolleiflex would have a digital version but stays true to its system.
@antoniomartins29007 ай бұрын
I loved the photos Becca! Becca you are such a great journalist. Love your reviews
@bethjaynes7956 ай бұрын
Love the way she describes this camera.
@U2haveanicedayty27 ай бұрын
Becca I so thank you for this Beautiful camera, Just like the Beautiful surroundings. Awesome Video. Again Thanks so much for sharing what I have missed. ✌️💯
@testshoot7 ай бұрын
Big fan of your reviews. I'll be grabbing the X2D in a week, this may join it in my camera bag
@chrismofer6 ай бұрын
amazing stuff. I love the idea of getting this back and putting on my hassy 500 body and lenses. I do quite like how the form factor and ergonomics force you to cradle the camera and take your time composing the shot. It's not about the megapixels, because nothing beats having a sensor that large. It literally shrinks the world in terms of DoF. In a few years when this becomes old hat, maybe i'll be able to afford one ;)
@beefyasian886 ай бұрын
Just want to say.... THANK YOU. ☺
@JJadx6 ай бұрын
thanks for the vid! if i see someone with this at night i know what i gotta do
@JJadx6 ай бұрын
i never had 8,200€ at once. really hope i meet that special someone fr fr
@bennyfactor7 ай бұрын
Hasselblads (and MF cameras generally) are really cool. Too bad they aren't doing OIS, though. Sure pay enough for them to implement it.
@zhanezar6 ай бұрын
I Love her passion , it come across in this review wish it was longer
@juantelle16 ай бұрын
These photos are amazing
@Aragorn78847 ай бұрын
That camera better mow my lawn and do my laundry for that much 🤑
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
It's a camera for hobbyists or professionals, and for those two groups of people the cost is justified :P
@totallypixelated6 ай бұрын
Well, it's a tool for earning a living so you can pay someone to mow your lawn or do your laundry!
@gregcorker21933 ай бұрын
Great review!
@marqessanzcora40897 ай бұрын
I'm glad you're still with us ❤🤝
@roydelonga48607 ай бұрын
Great review and so well put......thank you!
@metaforically7 ай бұрын
These photos are stunning! 😮
@TumblingMustard7 ай бұрын
Just to be clear, while I think this camera is kind of cool, I would never get one. I’m only here for the Becca review.
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
I'm waiting for the previous model prices to drop in the second hand market. Several years ago medium format was in an unobtainable price bracket, nowadays the first generation GFX sells for under $1500 and it's still an amazing camera.
@Astropowergtv7 ай бұрын
Lovely review so natural just like hasselblad ❤
@moazhmi7 ай бұрын
Becca and Nilay Reviews = Gold ✌🏾
@Theogwill7 ай бұрын
This is not just a camera it’s a medium format, even tho it’s not the full size medium format sensor compare to the bigger model it’s still great Hasselblad. Also Hasselblad ain’t the only company with LS lenses there’s also the Phase One XF or 645DF+.
@ak_hoops7 ай бұрын
Becca 🤝🏽 greatness! This was amazing
@atonal4407 ай бұрын
The original one was such a weird product I was sure it was a one-off. I'm amazed they updated it like this, and yeah, it's just good to see weird cameras still being made in this age of do-everything mirrorless marvels.
@moringaflower19986 ай бұрын
Aruba❤ thanks for capturing our beautiful island 🥰
@liulso6 ай бұрын
Vídeo delicado e preciso com algo tão subjetivo quanto o "sentimento" de utilizar um equipamento dessa magnitude. Considero a marca Hasselblad como uma expressão maior da arte de fotografar. Algo muito parecido com que a marca Leica transmite, ao seu modo.
@Guy_on_Youtube7 ай бұрын
Becca is the best. Knows what she's talking about, and super passionate!
@camerafusionАй бұрын
Great Review!
@altrujillo35667 ай бұрын
Wonderful, clear, succinct review! I think I'd still get the 907X 50C just for the savings....but if I one camera to carry on my yacht it would be this one. :)
@tvariuness7 ай бұрын
8k to learn to be "still" is for white rich folks haha
@hRt42kuo7jTtmk147 ай бұрын
If I want to be still I just throw back some weed, then it takes no effort, and it doesn't cost anything close to $8K. Couch-lock is the only way to fly...
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
or buy a film camera for $50
@eavesphoto7 ай бұрын
Did the LCD have some type of grid or level overlay? Also, can you use an old style cable release with it for the shutter?
@Lab-Rat6 ай бұрын
And oh yeah excellent review you had my attention the whole way
@alanpearly7 ай бұрын
Great review and a reminder to be still!
@xyzgta7 ай бұрын
EVERYTHING that is said from @5:34 is MY DREAM.
@lorisfeuillatre7 ай бұрын
That color science and scrip images are worth the price 🤯
@ThoughtFission7 ай бұрын
Ahhh, another youtuber with a piece of kit that the vast majority of us will never be able to afford.
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
That's what you get on product launch date, a bunch of sponsored "reviews".
@pimpingkek49477 ай бұрын
I have the 50 cfv will be cherishing it. My upgrade path will likely be the X2D.
@zacktonature7 ай бұрын
What type of lens was used for 1:55? This and the following one are such gorgeous shots. They could easily be the opening frame for a Wes Anderson flick.
@Kids111117 ай бұрын
It’s a crystal photo chrome X500 lens
@zacktonature7 ай бұрын
@@Kids11111 What is that? I can't find anything about it on Google.
@gibbsphotography2 ай бұрын
WITH OUT LOOKING AT THE FULL VIDEO... I COULD TELL YOU WERE IN OUR HOME TOWN OF ARUBA. WE SHOP AT TIN WEI! HAHHA
@aardsengel87 ай бұрын
Thank you and thank Hasselblad. Slowing down is essential to photography.
@nodrogkam7 ай бұрын
fantastic review and thoughtful.
@dukeofpokhara3 ай бұрын
Is the Hasselblad 907x 50c and 907x 100c are interchangeable?
@xyzgta7 ай бұрын
we all want to love someone the way Becca loves Hasselblad...!!
@ledged_up7 ай бұрын
I can't fathom why they wouldn't put IBIS in this but they have it in the X2D 100C. The body is certainly big enough...
@kyrreloftaas7 ай бұрын
Informativ, inspirational and cosy, somehow. 😊
@26alexxkidd6 ай бұрын
Such a beauty!
@rumblestar57717 ай бұрын
Nice review, thanks!
@mruczas6 ай бұрын
Hi nice video , do you know maybe where its made?
@gemini99555 ай бұрын
This little boy knows a lot about photography
@coardcreatif6 ай бұрын
this is insane
@sridharamirneni7 ай бұрын
Which lens is she using?
@-AtomsPhere-6 ай бұрын
Isn’t the NIKON ZF a full frame camera with a leaf shutter?
@bobrob88397 ай бұрын
So, why this camera and not the X2D? Same sensor and stabilization seems like you'd only buy this if you wanted the nostalgia of shooting with a traditional Hasselblad.
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
You answered your own question :D
@bobrob88397 ай бұрын
@@KNURKonesur fair enough!
@andreasoberg20216 ай бұрын
You can use it with 503 and its lenses. You can also use it as a technical camera. All interesting things to me but probably not for most others.
@GGori_997 ай бұрын
If i want to go back to those golden days of shutter sounds and everything.. i'll just pull out my traditional DLSR.. this being $8200 is not great for such a nostalgia and the sake of being different.. anyone still using D750 ????? This boy still rocking solid here..
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
No DSLR I ever used had a really satisfying shutter sound though. It would have to be a film SLR like the 8001 Nikon, or a Pentax 6x7, or the mother of shutter slaps - the Graflex 4x5" SpeedGraphic.
@totallypixelated6 ай бұрын
Put the back on a 500C body and you can have a shutter whump every time you press the release.
@krishnansrinivasan8307 ай бұрын
Awesome & Thanks :)
@JanSchiffman17 ай бұрын
Wonderful review.
@tenphan0n07 ай бұрын
I see Becca, I like video
@TheSujanroy7 ай бұрын
25 years ago I asked a photographer who sweared by Hasselblads "What's so special?" So he set up a test. Same film, same settings, same subject. His Hasselblad and my cheapest available Yashica SLR. After I saw the results, I never question a Hasselblad again. It is worth every penny!
@KNURKonesur7 ай бұрын
Wonder what would happen if he set up that Hasselblad against a Pentax 6x7, Mamiya 7 or Fujifilm 680 :P
@madrat51767 ай бұрын
Against my CHEAPEST camera 🤡
@viralmody97727 ай бұрын
How do you view the photos | Take Pictures in bright daylight using the LCD-Viewfinder ? The glare will make it difficult, correct?
@GetOutsideYourself4 ай бұрын
Going to Iran to trek with the nomads, and this would be amazing . . .
@rayamatsoleman39857 ай бұрын
enjoying your review again, so what's new :D
@hRt42kuo7jTtmk147 ай бұрын
Add in another $8K for 3 lenses. No thanks. It would be a fantastic studio camera for commercial work of food, products, etc, but it has no place in the outdoors. Plus that shutter sound is nothing like the fantastic thud sound you could get out of an old 501CM. Passssss.
@gc21614 ай бұрын
And yet, even with this camera, in fact with this camera, I will never be able to capture a photo like The Pond-Moonlight by Edward Steichen.
@lemon584216 ай бұрын
I know that the camera body is not weather sealed, but can it be used in misty and humid conditions, for example, in a forest early in the morning? When looking closely at the part with the sensor, it simply clips onto the body! I get the feeling that it's not securely attached to the body, just a click without any sealing based on what I see. Does dust and moisture have a way of getting in between the body and the sensor part?