They Parted As Brothers After Clearing Misconceptions - Shaykh Asrar Rashid And A Deobandi Student

[@farazmobin2776]

Never seen someone more knowledgeable and eloquent than sheikh asrar rashid in barelvi school of thought.

[@tayeebhussain5014]

There's no such thing as a barelvi school 😂

[@elfyjohnson261]

I can only say for sure, you never heard any barelvi scholars sincerely before, except in video forwarded to you by wahhabis.

[@farazmobin2776]

@ nope I heard them all they do is just shout

[@SajaadHussain-ow5gz]

@@anneeq008because it’s not a school of thought in academic terms

[@tariqaslam1853]

AlhumduLILLAH Ya RasoolULLAH maybe one day we will be good . Beautiful words dear shayk for our Beloved and our Creator, May we all worship HIM sincerely Ameemn

[@tariqaslam1853]

Rooted in Sunni Sufi belief Inshaa ALLAH

[@fskhankhan6155]

All the problem is because people comprehend hadiths and quran aayats as per their own understanding to suit their narrative without considering other hadiths. Hadith should be understood in a holistic way and not in a standalone way. They should be by correlated with other hadiths, quran Aayats and writing of the Ahle Sunnah scholars to comprehend it correctly Another important point is people will read hadiths without even knowing the context and the very reason for the occurrence of that particular event and other associated hadiths and quran aayats with it. It's like the case of a non medical person claiming he can perform a open heart surgery just because he has read a medical book (and is able to understand English) meant for cardiologists and surgeons on 'How to perform open heart surgery' without having idea that this book is meant for medical students (doctors) who have completed more than 6 years studying medical and who will be able to understand (with context) each and every line written of that book without the context itself written in that book since they have studied in previous years. In our context it is the Ahle Sunnah Ulemas who go through stringent study of hadiths for more than a decade (10 to 15 years of study) after which they are able to correctly interpret hadiths and quran aayats Hadiths and Quran Aayats should be understood as was understood by prophet (saw), sahabas and mother of believers, understanding it otherwise is a grave sin. This is the reason why we need imams like Abu Hanifa, imam Malik, imam Shafi (Rehmatullah-hi- aalamin) etc who had by heart lakhs of hadiths and were able to comprehend hadiths much better than a layman who cannot correlate with other hadiths and quran aayats. Finally we need to understand this hadith, “Among the progeny of this man will be people who will recite the Qur'an, but it will not go any further than their throats", by visiting the following link and correlate with my above statement. facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=585053554874509

[@rhettcalloway]

Wahabis aside, aren't barelivis committing shirk?

[@fskhankhan6155]

@rhettcalloway If some of them are not following the laws it doesn't make the whole community criminal.

[@rhettcalloway]

​@@fskhankhan6155I'm talking about the law itself

[@isaacismail2173]

This is years old; why repost it?

[@Aqi_momo]

For knowledge purposes?

[@hussinabdulrahman6869]

the Jews are the most populous in the world and shieaism shiea rafidh is a faction of the Jews and shieaism takfiri wahabism salafist is also a faction of the Jews

[@abdi7149]

😂😂😂

[@Spc20241]

Is believing in mawalid, whether prophets (SA) ilmul gyib, or made from noor has anything to do with Islamic creed? Are these pre- conditions of being a Mu'min or Muslim? No. So why these fruitless debate? Asrar Rasid , your arguments are 90% based on what other imams ,ulamas opinioned in their books, their commentaries, that's are your sources of references. You can not win any arguments if you have to give dalil from Quran, and sahih hadiths. What scholars opinioned in their books is not islamic references , its their opinion not hard fact. You can only use scholars references where they put arguments for or against whether a hadith is sahih or not. But you have made up your religion with what your chosen scholars wrote in their books. You cant win a debate even with a kid with chatgpt if you are restricted to give reference from Quran and sahih hadith only. Period.

[@elfyjohnson261]

Next time, why don't you debate with him if you are so confident

[@n3rdtronix]

@Hopeof24 yes they do have deep relation with creed and help in strenghtening iman and immense love with our Beloved Prophet ﷺ

[@abdi7149]

imaam ahmed raza khan never held these beliefs. asraar is deobandi apologist, why does he have to lie about the aqeedah of ahlus sunnah wal barelvi?

[@physixonfirehighfashionclothes]

ya nabi

[@holimolibebalanced9348]

I like sh asrar,but he is ignorant of tableegh jamaat,ml ilyaas was a big sufi,just like all the elders. First go to nizaamudeen and ask ml saad directly

[@JesusSaysIslamSaves]

ML. Ahmad Sadiq Desai, is a Deoband Alim. He is also a staunch believer in the Karamat of the Aulia Allah, (The Friends Of Allah) His Q & A is P. O. Box 3393 Port Elizabeth, South Africa 6056

[@azizedries8210]

Then you must know this is the same Mufti Desai who ran away from his own house when he was confronted by a Sunni Bareilvi scholar from Pakistan, Allama Shafei Okarvi to a DEBATE.

[@abdi7149]

imaam ahmed raza khan never held these beliefs. asraar is deobandi apologist, why does he have to lie about the aqeedah of ahlus sunnah wal barelvi?