They want to charge us for the air consumed by our engines??

[@DarkIzo]

suddenly air leaks dont seem so unattractive anymore

[@duckdeez1845]

Depends which side of the meter the leak is on

[@greebj]

Yeah I was just thinking an air leak could be very useful in the right spot 😅

[@MrJ183]

Another intake downstream of the meter 😊

[@DiyNuke]

Poof the new. Passthrough manifold pressure sensor has been invented... By me. Step1. Get the sensor Step2. Drill the sensor Step3 install Step4. Send me the money you saved. Step5. Go drink beer

[@jesseharriott4253]

Or egrs lol

[@Smartzenegger]

April Fools is late this year...

[@SkyMarcR32]

Smart and what?

[@adrianglennbionat]

in that part of the world. it's not unlikely. soon California will do the same.

[@mitchellandrew3318]

​@@adrianglennbionatI'm canadian. We have been paying a carbon tax for over a year. The US isn't giving in yet. The European counties are right behind. Woke liberals could win this battle of control. 100k don't get you much where I'm on the map in Canada anymore.

[@op.par_3035]

Paying for air is crazy

[@victordauphin2949]

Here in Canada they actually increased the carbon tax on April Fools day. Sickos.

[@MultiReefa]

Jeezus don't give Britain any ideas

[@snorb1tz]

Why they've said that they're putting compulsory speed limiters to our cars come 1st of June.

[@chrischaf]

​@@snorb1tz What "problem" are they attempting to say that compulsory speed limiters will actually "solve"? Traffic accidents? Severe injuries? A person can be run over and severely injured or killed by a vehicle traveling as little as 5mph (8kmh). To the question of how something like that could happen, here's a case in point. My sister was driving at about 5mph up an alley and nearing the end of it. A young girl came flying around the blind corner on a bicycle, head on with my sister's car. *Both* reacted fairly quickly, indeed, *overreacted* due to the severity of the situation, by slamming on their brakes. That caused a problem because the alleyway was *not paved*. It was dirt and sand, with a scattering of rocks/gravel mixed in. My sister's car did not have anti-lock brakes, though I don't know how much difference it would have actually made in this particular situation, as the highest speed vehicle was the bicycle which, of course, didn't have ABS. Anyway, both slammed on their brakes, and both slid. The child lost control when the bicycle slid and she and the bike disappeared down below the hood-line, which convinced my sister that she had just run over a child. She got out of the car and ran around the front, to find that the bicycle had gone far enough under the car that it was partially crushed, but the child hadn't. I can't remember if she was pinned or not, but my sister backed up off the bicycle as the child's parent came running up. The parent had somehow seen what had happened and didn't blame my sister at all, and said not to worry about the bicycle, it was her kid's fault and she was just happy her kid was alive. So, no deaths or serious injuries that time, but that's basically luck, as 1mph difference in speed of either vehicle or my sister or the child not reacting quite as fast, could have resulted in serious injury or death. The point being, that cars *can* be dangerous at *any* speed. This got really long. The short version is that I don't think putting speed limiters is actually going to prevent accidents or make driving less dangerous. It might actually end up causing *more* accidents, and make driving even *more* dangerous. The extended version is *very long*. ************************ LONG version below ;) *********************** Most accidents happen in cities, where speed is already reduced to much less than the maximum speed of the car. Most happen in residential areas and small rural roads, fairly close to home. So putting a cap at highway speeds would not prevent most accidents. Also, at highway speeds, sometimes you need to hit the gas in order to *avoid* an accident. So you can't reasonably limit the speed to the posted highway speed limit, without potentially causing accidents that otherwise wouldn't happen. And since the limiter can't be set to the actual speed limit, then everybody would have the option to speed up to the point of the limiter anyway. And I believe, if all cars were limited to, say, 10 mph above the speed limit, even *more* people would just go ahead and drive at THAT speed, feeling that (since their car was speed-limited) they couldn't really be considered "speeding". In town, that problem would probably be even worse, especially during "rush hour" and/or on high traffic roads. Because in those situations, there are really 3 types of drivers. 1) drivers that try to rush *ahead* of the pack 2) drivers that prefer to drive *with* the pack 3) drivers that will drive *at the speed limit or less*, and don't care what the rest of the pack is doing. That works reasonably well, because the people that want to speed ahead, quickly get ahead of the pack, where they present less of a danger to *the pack*. While the main pack will generally just go the same speed as each other, whatever that speed is. The slower drivers are quickly left behind, so both the faster drivers, and slower drivers, are quickly "separated from the herd" and each group ends up playing by their own groups sort of rules. But... If you set a speed-limiter on the vehicles, either *at* the posted speed limit, or slightly above... Then suddenly you have a mess where the most *aggressive* drivers are mixed bumper to bumper with the regular *drive-the-same-as-the-rest-of-the-pack* drivers AND what would normally be the *slowest* drivers. "Pack leaders" will STILL be determined to get to the front of the pack, but since they can't quickly just outpace other drivers, they will have to constantly "jockey for the best position", and since the pack will be even more dense (because nobody can quickly outpace each other) they will have to take *even more risks and chances* to get ahead. And the resulting mess is likely to force the low and medium speed drivers out of their comfort zone on a regular basis, which will increase stress, distraction/confusion, and likely force slow and medium drivers to speed up and drive more aggressively in order to survive. It also is likely to "train" drivers to just put the gas to the floor. I mean, *why not*, if your car is speed limited to the posted speed, you'd never really have to worry about speeding, right? So just floor it all the time, get up to the limit, and stay there. I used to commute to a large city every morning, and the closer I got to the city, the more drivers I'd drive who were effectively just like that. They'd pretty much punch it at *every* stop light, trying to get up to the fastest speed they felt they could get away with, as quickly as possible. On the way *to* work one morning, I actually got rear-ended because I didn't take off fast enough. It was a little old lady and she was just, like "Oh, I'm sorry, I thought you'd gone on" Neither car was damaged, so we agreed not to bother with anything official and just left. Then as I was going home each day, it was *even worse*. The gearing on my small truck wasn't the best for take off, so I had to take off right around tire chirping speed and keep the little 2.8 v6 floored till I got up to the speed of the pack, and the whole time others were zipping around me, so even though I was taking off as fast as I possibly could, I wasn't "getting ahead" of *anybody*, but I still had to take off and go as fast as I possibly could (up to pack speeds) just to keep from getting run over. Pack speeds at that time during rush hours tended to run anywhere from 5-15 mph over the speed limit, with faster folks getting on ahead at the first few lights so at least we didn't have to worry about them any more. It'd also be an absolute mess to try to have the speed limiter somehow "sense" what the speed limit is supposed to be where the car is at. Like, is it supposed to limit your speed to 30, in 30mph zones, and 70 in 70mph zones? I haven't seen any sort of technology that could do that, that *isn't infallible*. GPS? I just recently watched a video where GPS keeps sending delivery drivers *literally* through a guy's yard. He put up cones to try and stop them, and they just moved the cones lol GPS is *totally NOT infallible*, and with the way I've already mentioned about how a lot of drivers would get *trained* to just floor it all the time, since it's limited so why not? Well, what happens when somebody used to flooring it to get to or stay at 30, or 45, suddenly decides it's okay to go 70, or unlimited? I mean, you'd kind of have to have some sort of unlimited mode, otherwise in a "smart system", what would happen if it loses connection with the signal or whatever saying what the local speed limit is? Would the car just, like, *stop*? And what happens when you are passing somebody at 70, and suddenly your car decides the local speed limit is 30? Does your engine just cut out? The whole framework required for "smart limiters" would be *ridiculously complicated and expensive, while STILL not being infallible*, making it a very expensive way to potentially cause even more accidents due to taking control away from the driver in potentially dangerous situations, while simultaneously training drivers to be even more aggressive and take more chances, because of increased traffic density and the belief that you essentially "can't speed" anymore. "Dumb limiters", that just set the max speed at, or a little above, the maximum highway speed in the country - wont decrease lower speed accidents (although the possibility of problems with the limiters causing issues that could lead to accidents would now also be there), but could potentially *increase* high speed accidents in any case where a little more speed could have prevented an accident, and/or cases where the limiters might cause a problem that could lead to an accident. Not only all that, but you also create a potential "black market" for devices or services that will defeat the limiters, AND will have to create some sort department to try and somehow monitor/enforce the use of the devices, and to try and eradicate or at least decrease the black market that was *created* by the devices in the first place. The devices have to be manufactured by someone, and installed by someone, and that'll have to be watched over/controlled by someone. An entire unnecessary industry will need to be created. So, more legislation will be required, more laws, more cost, upon cost... And who is going to pay for all of that? What will punishments be for failing to comply? High fines for not using the stuff your higher taxes paid for? Jail time? Will they take your vehicle? And who is going to be considered *responsible* for any accidents and/or property destruction caused when these devices malfunction, because of course, a percentage of them WILL malfunction. And a percentage of those malfunctions will cause some deaths. So, what do we consider *acceptable losses* caused by these limiter devices? Driving is a dangerous. But taking various levels of control away from the driver, isn't necessarily going to make driving "safer". It *might* even make things MORE dangerous, in many ways.

[@a134-j2b]

@@chrischaf i am not reading that

[@MultiReefa]

@@snorb1tz Really that won't bother me the slightest I'm that guy that holds everybody up for work doing the speed limit

[@chrischaf]

@@a134-j2b I'm glad to hear that :) I wouldn't want someone who didn't like reading long posts, to read a long post.

[@deepblue812]

so charging for breathing is next I guess? Metered mask on your face with heavy fines for taking it off.

[@lachan41774]

Saw a movie like that

[@EvgeniBelin]

​​@@lachan41774came to say these exact words

[@johnhershey4010]

That's Russia for you. If it the Gas prices going up its the Air prices.

[@bradbeck2601]

Covid was a test run for it...

[@gregharris4139]

The alternative is to arm yourselves with something big and heavy and stop being lame.

[@jerrykrovichdrvlof1362]

Easy: change engine's rotation to counterclockwise and use the exhaust as the new intake You would even get paid for using your car 😂😂😂

[@miniwattnetwork8204]

I almost had a heart attack of laughter 😂😂😂

[@miniwattnetwork8204]

I just farted, instead

[@greebj]

And we thought they modded that engine to spin backwards just for gits n shiggles. They prepared for this, 7D chess masters right here

[@danielwardle5374]

I'm sure these did that already 😂

[@Hellsong89]

Nah, it would be same as old but not oldest cars odometer, turns forwards regardless witch ever direction it spins, but i appreciate the thinking there.

[@austinfleck8664]

I get a dollar a year is cheap but unless runs only on idle when you are actually driving around your engine will use MUCH more air.

[@Dusky_The_Husky]

Well... To the USA it's a dollar a year because the ruble is worth $0.01101 USD after the sanctions placed because of the Ukraine situation. But to the hard working Russians who have nothing to do with it. A Ruble is still a Ruble. It stinks that now he has to put them on all his "experiments". 😥

[@b3notafraid960]

@@Dusky_The_Huskyeven so why should we let them tax the air my car breathes? We invented America to run away from taxes. They aren’t having that on my car

[@fadingbeleifs]

​@@Dusky_The_Huskyit's not about the amount... It's about the principle of it... It's just fucking wrong.

[@Dusky_The_Husky]

@@b3notafraid960 it's not for America. Valad said it's for them. But I did see a few others in the comments section saying that he's joking. I hope there right!

[@Dusky_The_Husky]

@@fadingbeleifs Your Right! I'd like to believe that Pres, Putin wouldn't stoop that low for war funds. I did see a few others in the comments section saying that he's joking. I hope thats the case. Lol

[@dermetzger]

Even tho 79 rubles only converts to about $0.87, that is still some fuckin bullshit

[@SF-dy6hn]

That’s how they get ya first it’s a bullshit fee but it’s cheaper later on down the road the price inflated and people keep paying

[@KingTrump2024]

Sounds like a woke WEF policy to eliminate cars

[@dakoderii4221]

Not to eliminate cars entirely. Cars are for the ultra rich as they can afford the tax. Leftists say this ensures money and power will not be centralized in the hands of a few. They also say men can get pregnant.

[@GlennLittleford]

I dont think you know what "woke" means.

[@KingTrump2024]

@@GlennLittleford and I don't think you do either. Stfu

[@dakoderii4221]

@@GlennLittleford Take your own advice. Look deeper into who is leading the "woke" movement. You won't like what you find IF you TRULY stand by your beliefs and just don't go along to get along with the crowd. If you don't have any solid values and beliefs then hey just go where the wind blows.

[@KingTrump2024]

@@GlennLittleford I think it is you that needs educating on whats going on with this world.

[@Dan_Gleebalz]

Coming soon to California.

[@jacobrzeszewski6527]

God, I could see CARB doing this.

[@jetpackjbd]

This is a joke to anyone unaware, no law like this is planned to take effect anywhere

[@ferencfarkas9003]

well, in times like nowadays one cant be 100% sure...

[@cpuwizard9225]

Yet. You forgot that word. It's all a joke until you try and think of 3 things or actions that aren't taxed, regulated, or outright prohibited. Then it seems less like a joke and more like a proposal.

[@Sangoreborn]

Justin Trudeau : Hold my red socks!

[@leerusch7392]

Give it time.

[@luyyyu]

Yet

[@Peelt_back]

We shutting the motor off every red light with this one

[@Atomic-ProductionsYT]

Wait til he finds out most new American cars do that 😔

[@oskarpolanski3152]

That is one weird Mass Airflow Sensor😅😂

[@istvanpapp1974]

This is bullshit 😂

[@Kalus_Saxon]

I’m surprised it’s not in the west already

[@arcflash2053]

​@@Kalus_Saxon It would be too effective in reality. Western politicians are much more focused on the appearance of effectiveness. Generally speaking.

[@CGrantL]

@@arcflash2053what? 😂 it would cost more to install these silly meters than the taxes collected. If you insist on some environmental tax then just tax the fuel

[@arcflash2053]

@@CGrantL If they implemented this in the United States I'm sure they would make the vehicle onwer pay for them. Then they would tax the install and inspection. They'd make you pay tax on the actual air you used according to the meter too. They wouldn't care about how much it cost because they wouldn't pay for it. Is the vehicle owner would. Fuel is already taxed but they don't use that tax money for road infrastructure like they are supposed. As for me I am not for an environmental tax. Nor do I believe in unrealistic fuel economy standards. I believe automobile should be manufactured to last as long as possible. They should be as maintainable and repairable as possible. Not chasing unrealistic energy efficiently ratios while becoming ever more fragile and short lived.

[@CGrantL]

​@@arcflash2053 you are definitely wrong there. passing the cost of compliance and collection on to the taxpayer like that isn't a common tactic in the west - the closest we have to that is income taxes.

[@anonymousinc6330]

Let's start with charging power plants and manufacturing facilities for the air they use. This BS will get dropped overnight.

[@IceAge20017]

This actually seems like something the American Democrats would do.

[@chrischaf]

I think you got it backwards. It would be republicans. But there would be a stipulation that anyone making over $60,000 a year would be exempt.

[@jusb1066]

t did you see what trump is going to do Z,?

[@SpoiledBadgerMilk]

Shhhh dont give em any ideas

[@erikcourtney1834]

My god get Trumps name out of your mouth because your to ignorant to understand politics or even simple news.

[@JoeBidenIsNotMyPresident]

​@chrischaf Yea, like the Republicans were forcing people to take an experimental jab and want Americans to get rid of gas vehicles for electric cars that can't go over 150 miles without charges and when a battery pack messes up, it totals out the car. You got it all wrong buddy.

[@1chumley1]

The gas station charges me for air. 25 cents a minute.

[@DashCamSerbia]

It is the electricity for the compressor what they are charging you, not air itself.

[@TerrorTubbie666]

And they charge for these nice brand new long air hoses that get stolen again and again. At least, that's why it's more like a euro a minute over here in Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

[@mihneacireasa4613]

@@TerrorTubbie666In Romania it’s usually free, some gas stations even have 1 air compressor at every gas pump 🤷‍♂️

[@mariog.8331]

@@mihneacireasa4613 Mexico is same thing as well

[@mihneacireasa4613]

@@mariog.8331 weird how our countries are considered third world while in 'wealthy' countries you pay even for air

[@phatcowboy76]

Taxing air. Carbon tax. Same thing. Same stupid.

[@Adrian-qc7ky]

The Australian government has joined the chat !! 😃

[@weppanx]

The 'Australian Government' is a fraud.. A UN owned subsidiary corporation. Just all the Aussies forgot with all their tech. Except me and about 500,000 of us. Join the de jure Commonwealth of Australia ,proper nouns ,proper English.. And get away from the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA. It is Rancid and a human smuggling operation.. 10,000 people every year disappear. And are never found. But don't worry just watch RBA and see them ponce around with nobodies ,who haven't hurt or killed anyone. ,trying to make themselves look good.. While the real criminals ,they protect to this day..

[@MiaFeustel]

So less then a buck for a year? 79 rubles is like .86 cents usa

[@jusb1066]

Exactly, also then it would be impossible to do.. what's the stop you changing the manifold etc. and he's complaining about less than a dollar a year

[@andreibarbulescu3276]

Rusia is not America. Most people are dirt poor. And thats for the car idling when you drive it sucks a lot more air

[@nicholasholloway8743]

​@@jusb1066 That's the mistake we make, give them an inch and they take a mile. Ain't that much? Sure id agree but what door does that open? What's next?

[@volvo09]

It's a joke 😂 that's a water meter

[@jusb1066]

@@nicholasholloway8743 how did they expect to pay for the war they are waging

[@TylerRivera635]

Literally taxing us for the air we breath manifested 😆

[@joaoc_PT]

Ursula: hold my Pretzel

[@jefdamen2977]

What happens if u put vacuum on the input?

[@JohnSmith-jl3fm]

Suppose the law won't apply running "on" a vacuum not "in" a vacuum 😂😂 Technicality accounted for. 👍

[@dfdempire8912]

79 rubles. thats £0.69 Per year

[@jaredkennedy6576]

When a country finds itself in need of new income streams, often it's the citizens who get the bill. After sending off a bunch of folks to die in a pointless war, maybe forceful extraction of money like this will initiate a desire for a political change.

[@krie8879]

That is crazy. Hopefully this will never happen.

[@enormousdork3831]

Propane injection will decrease the ambient air consumption. "IF" you can put together a HHO or browns gas generator that is efficient enough, the gas generated can also replace a portion of abient air ingested be an engine.

[@marck0060]

This is so funny considering LPG conversions are extremely common in Russia

[@RaspingPompano2]

$79 rubles each year doesn’t sound all that bad. That’s less than a dollar here in the States. But you have to look at like this, $79 rubles goes about 40x further than $1 here in the United States.

[@Ottonic6]

Anyone see the movie "In Time"? You're not charged for the air you breath, but on your 25th birthday you are automatically given 1 yr in time on a chip embedded in your arm. You work for time, you pay for things with time, Time can be transferred from one person to another, but if your time hits 0... You die.

[@billynomates920]

yes i remember that movie.

[@the_kombinator]

I'm absolutely sure I can bypass this with minimal effort.

[@andrewburnham1726]

Please tell he how long a law enforcement vehicle runs during any transit or while extracting subjects from their vehicle? Dues that apply to law enforcement since they enforce the law?

[@NeuKrofta]

This is a clever way to reduce gas consumption. Less air means less combustion, less combustion means less fuel burned

[@marswell2408]

This air consumption was only tested at idle. Will be more during actual driving

[@blueridgemountainprepper2166]

Y'all better stand up and say hell no. Once a freedom is gone, it takes enormous effort to get it back

[@Salador1777]

I turn my engine off anyways. I hate idling. It causes all the bad pollution. One starter motor. It's almost thirty years old. Anything more than 30 seconds you can just restart the engine

[@jhoughjr1]

Interesting idea to measure air consumption

[@Theo59er]

There IS Something named Air fuel Mixture use this so you can lift the Gas price instead of using Something Like this .. If this even where real 😂

[@Cripinub1]

We in London have to pay ULEZ if our car is below Euro 4, £12.50 a day 😮

[@Thatrandomwhiteguy]

RIP freedom

[@timfeeley714-25]

Holy crap, sounds like something California would do!

[@johannviljoen64]

If the government gets a foot in the door with this law its over, the rate will increase annually until everyone is back on horseback, unless there is a tax on horses already?

[@AgustinCesar]

We need to start doing stuff to stop this

[@KeyboardBuster]

We need to low key quietly rediscover the stan meyer water fuel cell trchnology and build it for our own private use. Fuck big brother and fuck the oil Aladins.

[@gtd360]

Thats about 20% of a penny a day in USD. Or 87 cents a year. Am I missing sarcasm? Or is it because the equipment to measure it is more expensive than the government will get back. Sounds like curruption. Whoevers making the measuring device will make more than the government.

[@jacoblittle5869]

Wooo a whopping 87 cents lmao

[@carlherrnstein9544]

I literally cannot tell if it's a joke. This is something I could believe being tried in California. That meter looks an awful lot like a water meter for a irrigation setup. Beware of the danger of memeing things into existence.

[@taxstampinsurrectionist]

feds can install that meter on DEEEEEEZZZ...

[@policenineplayz1724]

NNNNNUUUUUUUTTTTTTTZZZZZZ

[@zackatwood2867]

Wearing a mask=wearing a seatbelt, you lost before you started when you can get a ticket sitting alone in your car w/o speeding or drinking

[@JesusisJesus]

What does a kopek or ruble convert to in money terms?

[@robs93jdmaccord]

The guys with diesel trucks are gonna cry lmao

[@volvo09]

In before everyone realizes this is a joke video.

[@kxpes]

With everything that is going on, i would not assume this is joke in best case scenario whisle blowing.

[@ferencfarkas9003]

We almost had air tax in the 90s in the country where Im from...

[@gregharris4139]

Time to get a big plumbers wrench to put on my back seat

[@Mr_Ender_05]

Where can I get that air gauge it looks fun to play around with

[@ashleym2878]

That will cost the government more policing that policy than its worth in air tax. So hopefully someone has some commen sense and doesn't pass

[@stevesepaniak5565]

So 79 rubles is about $0.87 American per year.. one rubel is equal to $0.011 us.. that being said love the satire

[@MrKalashnikov47]

Connect the intake to a politicians mouth. Free air for life! His😂

[@snapped4433]

As a person with a modified vehicle i will be removing or plugging this for 99% of the time

[@T_Burd_75]

*looks lovingly at my Geo Metro*

[@location_florida]

None of that will ever be on my equipment lol. Good luck with that

[@jrwizz]

Yeah 😂 let em try... let em TRY

[@gavmansworkshop5624]

If you drove to work all year and it came up low air consumption they'll probably look for what you did so cheating it might be hard too.

[@me8042]

How much air will a Lada use in an hour? 4 or 5 cubic ft? IT’S A LADA! They’re lucky to run an hour.

[@leo959]

79 ruples to USD is .87$

[@vvorldnewsmedia]

what a great troll love it you guys are great

[@123fourfive5]

Thats a new method. Is it used anywhere else?

[@FZERO20]

Charged for air consumption??? No way

[@MindsMouth]

Was this April fools??

[@ImigrentfromMars]

At least this would be better than Canada's real bs carbon tax

[@guy_incognito7538]

79 cents in USD I laughed out loud when i ran the conversion

[@kennethphillips6362]

Next year they're considering a law to fine you if you don't have a zebra in your possession at all times better hope they don't pass it.

[@mercoldswfo]

For anyone wondering: 79 Rubles is $0.87 American dollars.

[@yaxeldavid]

Please tell me the conversion. I believe I did ot correctly and it showed 87 us cents, per year. If that is the case, the meter will cost more than the year, correct? Guys, please fact check me, i would like to know.

[@janzelf]

You know there's always gonna be pedigree One own the air one pay to breathe

[@erkinalp]

We already have a word for this in Turkish (bedava), but it over time eroded out of meaning, and is now used to mean "free of charge".

[@joshuatheaveragejoe5786]

That is something I expect California to do

[@clintonkirker5154]

I’m surprised California hasn’t tried it yet.

[@bobbyshands]

Literally the lorax

[@thomasbarlow4223]

World governments are getting out of hand

[@Gkitchens1]

Gotta feed the war machine man. It’s probably temporary

[@Ang3lUki]

The price for imports is WAY higher! Wow!

[@mechanicallycreative9788]

.87 us cents. Jesus. It's just the Soviet Union 2.0.

[@kanggoo57]

79 rubles is under a dollar lads, it doesnt really matter.

[@beaumontlivingston8084]

Interrupt the input from the meter and just block it off. Problem solved.

[@glencalhoun9544]

Dayum Brother.... I Pray 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 that Doesn't Happen To You ALL!!! That Sucks!!!

[@andypdq]

It's a special environmental operation, to help fund you know what....

[@mrtechpat]

79 rubles is like .87 cents American But he did say at idle

[@gothicpagan.666]

The value of Toyota rally cars just went up🙂

[@envisionCamusa]

USA We'll say no. 1A Don't listen and we'll go with the 2 plan

[@蘇服-q7v]

looks like something that EPA and MOT in Taiwan will do.

[@exhaust_momyrow2702]

Wouldn’t this result in more pollution tho ? The fuel won’t have as much air as normal

[@ovalwingnut]

Yeah. But it's that just a lot of "hot air"? I'm asking for a friend.

[@Iowa599]

Haha! No, they won't. The amount of air ingested has little to do with the amount of pollution exhausted. well they shouldn't, but Putin is crazy.

[@dockvada]

That $1.19 per year in Canadian

[@gravyd316]

Wow...My truck probably ingests that in one revolution of it's engine. I thought it was getting bad here. Now their using the green goblin in Russia.

[@tylerlowder2338]

I van see this coming to the EU & then the US soon.

[@thurston383]

Do you pay road tax? Ours is supposed to be based on emissions but I’m pretty sure it has nothing to do with emissions 🤣

[@dragan3290]

So I'd go bankrupt with 300 g/s at full throttle? Lol 😂

[@kingofthecards9767]

Sounds like another uncalled for tax

[@samleen]

Time to flip the lid😂

[@MrLamf2939sh]

Easy. Add a little hole in the intake

[@masautomx2131]

Y cómo van a controlar todos los autos que hay para medir el aire consumido y asegurarse de que todos pagaron?

[@sergioramses2615]

What did they smoke to think that 😮

[@KeyboardBuster]

They smoked a bong full of canukistan crystal brand stupidity.

[@fisshuman]

At this point, why bother? Just ban the whole car and we didn't have to go through this.