This AI Tool Does Literature Reviews in SECONDS (100x faster than you)

[@EddaFredericks]

specswriter AI fixes this. AI tool accelerates literature reviews.

[@ingowinkler1168]

Another very interesting tool. Given the Nummer of tools you suggested on your channel, I wonder when you start talking about resonsible use of AI in academia.

[@rutger4131]

I'm afraid that the amount of b.s. that's going to be published in the coming years is just as worrying as how worringly good this is. It's already happening but it will scale up. The REAL challenge in academia in the future will be finding papers that are actually of value.

[@stuartedwards3622]

Plenty of bs published in academia at the moment and finding papers of value can currently be a challenge 😂

[@CaptZenPetabyte]

Recently completed a Masters (here in Australia) and frequently the marking was released late as people had turned in nearly 100% AI research reports?!

[@AnswerThisio]

I believe it's crucial to educate students to view these tools as resources rather than just means to complete their projects. Much like a hammer can be used for both good and bad, AI carries the same potential. While we may witness remarkable publications in the future thanks to improved access to literature and enhanced writing capabilities, it's equally important to prioritize responsibility in their use.

[@ahmedamin3429]

Hi Dr. Great tool, we always expect you to come up with great things. Thank you very much. What bout plagiarism?

[@AnswerThisio]

Entertaining and great overview of our tool, Andy! We're all about helping researchers save time without sacrificing quality. Glad to see AnswerThis fitting right into your workflow. We’ve built the tool entirely around what researchers need, and we're always open to feedback as we continue to roll out new updates. If anyone has questions or thoughts, don’t hesitate to let us know!

[@Foodieme610]

Thanks for sharing such a wonderful tool.....am going to use it for my project work...

[@brandenborn9510]

Andy, your stuff is amazing and your enthusiasm for teaching is contagious. Thank you for helping people understand the opportunities provided by such AI tools. As a faculty member, I very much appreciate your regular comments that people ultimately also need to actually *read the text* to hold the knowledge for themselves. I'm a bit amazed and equally skeeved out seeing the generative capabilities, though again, thanks for being explicit about not using that as original work. What are your thoughts on the ever-moving gray line between such AI generated text and original text? I think once people have such detailed text it's hard to just rework it into their own voice.

[@coldlyanalytical1351]

Your switch to a dumb phone is interesting. I now need to upgrade my phone .. but do I get a newer phone which supports that new ChatGPT AI speaking buddy, or do I save my soul and get a dumb phone? Tricky. What about Google Maps, Whatsapp etc?

[@vik6986]

Great video as always. Please review Romo AI. Worth buying or not

[@nab5035]

that random tangent about researchers being bad kissers😂😂😂😂 i love it, can disagree though

[@lifeprinciplespodcast]

Andy, Salam. Thanks. You are amazing and making our lives so much easier. Thanks. Just a question. Is this now your favourite tool? Or you're still recimandung others?

[@AnswerThisio]

Andy should choose his next words wisely! 😂

[@tulioeguez4228]

Hi, which one do you think is better for summaries of qualitative data, SciSpace or answethis ai? Thanks!

[@Seanchai_Tostach]

The etymology of the word passion lies in the concept of suffering. So maybe it's not entirely far off the mark?

[@PRITIYADAV-u8n]

Hi, do you have any suggestions on reading literature review papers quickly and efficiently?

[@nab5035]

remove distractions + have a plan (know what you are looking for in a paper)

[@damanrique]

Between this one and Elicit, what will be your choice for literature review if your buget just allow you one of them?

[@AnswerThisio]

It has to be AnswerThis 😁

[@ChangaPradera]

i heard papergen can write lr too! and it can bypass ai checker!

[@njoroon8440]

How do AI generated writeups fair with plagiarism? AI in research isn't bad at all. It just makes work lots easier. It all depends on how one uses it. It's akin to a mathematical calculator versus manual calculations. With the search engines, one can search for the bible. With the same, one can search for adult sites.

[@drfranke]

Andy, great tool, but the free plan doesn't offer the papers. The good thing is there is a discount for educators with an EDU email.

[@shawnb4745]

Thanks Dr Andy, very efficient. Used it to strengthen a lit review for a paper that I have to revise and it even referenced a preprint that I have on the topic lol. Nice. Just have to validate the references because it doesn't reliably give DOIs on all in the reference list.

[@coldlyanalytical1351]

Almost every resume/CV I have seen contains the word "passionate".

[@neilmcbride8945]

So who’s going to be left to read this proliferation of AI generated literature reviews?

[@squib3083]

As of 2024, any AI assisted writing will generate crap.

[@username42]

thanks for the video after watching this , it is 100% clear that not worthy for 22 USD at all :D

[@organisedme]

no idea where we are heading Dr. buy another chair😇

[@KN-tx7sd]

the web site is down.

[@umoz8201]

Seems up for me

[@Foodieme610]

It's working ... New updates... Quite interesting

[@jecabarbosa76]

Reddit ❤

[@Dt.sam6665]

Every video you change your mind to a new tools we got confused

[@lifeprinciplespodcast]

Because each time a newer tool is coming to the market

[@kieranhanrahan2883]

Hi Andy, love your videos. I did a test on this in respect of a qualitative research heavy domain and the results were not good (that's me being very diplomatic).... it found just 4 cited articles over a specified 24 year period. Having studied the area, I know of around 40 papers, national plans, and other key documents that it should have found. I'll keep playing with it, but all these tools are only as good as the databases they are searching...

[@AnswerThisio]

Hello! Thank you for your feedback. I’d love to review the answer we provided and work on improving its accuracy. Please feel free to share any additional feedback on the site, and I’ll follow up with an email shortly to connect with you. I apologize for your experience; I assure you this is not typical of what our users usually encounter

[@ryancormack6934]

​@@AnswerThisioWhich databases are avavilable to this AI? If it is only open source English language journals, I would imagine there would be large and significant gaps in knowledge.

[@amartripathy]

If I have CHATGPT Plus in oaid form, do I need to pay again here?

[@Foodieme610]

Chatgpt won't give you answers with evidences.. Here you get in-line-citations and reference list

[@mohsinaziz2000]

Wow! Your doing a great job for lazy researchers ...lolx