This gentleman was taking photos of you.

[@shiaras4675]

As far as I remember, because it's been a while since I saw this ep, the police were on alert around the woman because she was receiving death threats. And I think there was already an attempt on her life? So they're suspicious of the guy.

[@RoamerMovie-su5os]

yep

[@veronicacrabtreehill6608]

True. She had a threat on her life.

[@lilogonzales6625]

She's kind of dumb.....😂

[@marlenealt3597]

The camera guy freaked me out. His behavior was way off😮.

[@kirkengnath5501]

Potential stalker with overly high love or lust interest.

[@damiandavis612]

Yandere

[@waterbradone5476]

Fax

[@networkmarketingtips782]

that guy look like he paid the stalker 100%

[@sirmorosisgames7197]

At least she getting a warrant ig 🤷‍♂️

[@josephhurst4902]

Actually if they tricked him into giving permission, OR his Camera has the last photo displayed on the screen, those they need no permission to view.

[@Raccoonocity]

The dude that walked up, always just pisses me off, he gets mad at the fact the cops are doing their job, and when they do something nice yet he Still hates them I just don't understand him, he hates cops doing nothing, but then they do something and he still gets mad

[@meraj205]

He doesn't trust the police because of how they have unfairly treated his community.

[@masterblaster6703]

Realistic in that regard

[@socketyellow3]

Based off real people

[@veronicacrabtreehill6608]

​@@socketyellow3 Tell that to the script writers.

[@mr.chicken688]

Wild that the victim is on the stalkers side

[@alwaystruetoblue]

She is on the side of the law not the stalker.

[@meraj205]

She's a professor of law and ethics, so she's acting on principal, not on favor.

[@loganwalker8537]

Her life is in danger A attempt was already made And yet shed protect her potential stalker​@alwaystruetoblue

[@rb3k157]

@@loganwalker8537we don’t get to pick and choose what laws we follow and when we follow them.

[@loganwalker8537]

@@rb3k157 ahh so your a idiot that would rather be murdered than see your potentioal murderer hand over potential evidence that could save your life, got it

[@Minimish28]

Bro that guy who walked up pisses me off so much, like the guy is so mad that the cops are apparently racist for arresting people who commit crimes. Now he’s siding with the stalker just because he hates cops

[@lordvika2526]

That's a typical cop hater. They don't care what the police are doing they will find any reason, to hate on the police.

[@JamesMerlaut]

On another video I'm in a debate with a guy who is defending the criminal because Tim (same show) had a blood sample taken from him. The guy in question was DUI and killed two people.

[@lordvika2526]

@@JamesMerlaut the police can legally take a blood sample from a person to test for blood alcohol levels. Depending on the circumstances they may need a warrant to do so .

[@JamesMerlaut]

@@lordvika2526 Oh dw, I've explained it to him like 5 times by now... he's still not getting it... it's the cop hate

[@Turtleisaman]

Bro he’s married to the female cop

[@alliehereforu9933]

She's from shameless

[@ShebaB2017]

It's TV. Where is the paragraph guy?

[@lauraherzfeldswab5865]

Actually if it is on a camera than cops don’t need a warrant because it can be easily deleted

[@GrinningJest3r]

That's not true at all. Police need a warrant to search ANYTHING you own.

[@toasty8547]

Thats not how it works. Police are not supposed to delete pictures unless with a court order or would directly prevent a crime. (Insert im not a lawyer]

[@DaMunkeeking]

They need a warrant but based on suspicion they can detain you to get said warrant

[@lauraherzfeldswab5865]

@@GrinningJest3r mb guess I thought wrong

[@lauraherzfeldswab5865]

@@DaMunkeeking ohh my I though wrong then

[@rashs8907]

Waooo, I am in shock. He took pictures of her, and she and the other guy or husband or boyfriend or brother became his lawyers. OMG 😱 😱 . Maybe it is because he is ----- and they -----.

[@Iwozere]

Shoehorning race into a fictional show. Well done.

[@meraj205]

She's a professor of law and ethics, and he's a community member in a neighborhood that has been often targeted unfairly by law enforcement so he doesn't trust the police. Also, Officer Nolan is one of her students. It helps if you understand the context of the show instead of making assumptions.

[@Iwozere]

@@meraj205 read the comment above mine.

[@meraj205]

@@Iwozere your comment is the first I see under rash's. I was replying to rash.

[@lcoopcooperl]

If people think these are dumb, unrealistic dialogues, they're actually not... I think this is more intended to thoroughly explain to the public their rights rather than for pure entertainment purposes. Which I think is better than mind-numbing garbage.

[@jasigana8900]

Heh. Cops that listen.

[@madelaine3803]

The law is a double sword depending which side your on.

[@tubro541]

Based on the clip, the cops are in the wrong, but we don't have context or any background information.

[@shiaras4675]

@@tubro541 For context: the police were on high alert around the woman because she was receiving death threats and there's already been an attempt on her life. That's why the police were there in the first place.

[@jimreimers4213]

She does not know (the police) at all. Well, she doesn't care about the law at all.

[@meraj205]

She's a professor of law and ethics. She absolutely cares about the law.

[@chillboi1476]

If there’s reasonable suspicion and it can be backed up you don’t need a warrant

[@deweyplanck9850]

If there’s reasonable articulable suspicion, there’s a difference. He has to be doing something more than exercising a right to make it articulable suspicion. Also she’s not allowed to hold him till she gets a warrant. You can’t detain a person who is not committing a crime unless you have cause that he’s about to commit a crime.

[@grimgrinners]

Probable cause. They have the right to seize and search.

[@rashs8907]

I was a real fanatic of this series until I saw this chapter and another one. Not anymore

[@xenaguy01]

The guy who walked up is correct. The COPS need a warrant to search his camera. But then the COPS are also correct, they can detain him until rheir warrant arrives.

[@deweyplanck9850]

No they can’t. It’d be thrown out in a second with a mediocre lawyer. You can’t detain a person unless he’s committed a crime or you have reasonable articulable suspicion that he is about to commit a crime. Exercising a right cannot be used as a suspicion of either. Doing something someone finds suspicious is not a crime or an indication that they are going to. Even if he’s enamored by her and is taking her picture that’s not a crime. It could just as easy be argued that since he is enamored by her he would be less likely to harm her. What they could have done is ask him about his activity but he’s not obligated to engage with them at all.

[@pasques]

they can take the camera, but not search it until the warrant

[@bananer5644]

They have the right to take your property, not sure about checking it without a warrent tho

[@Dozz03]

idk US law, but uhhhh, isn't it only a Law issue if they search without consent? like, if they asked to see i, and he said yes and showed them that he had done nothing wrong.... then that's his own doing? no? like, how its a crime to steal but if someone gives you something willingly its... ya know, not? maybe i just don't understand the issue.

[@alexandermoran7783]

Actually technically they can arrest him take the camera cause it is probable cause since he is clearly stalking and her car was broken into and he is now a suspect

[@stonedgoddess420]

Actually you can photograph anything in public. Even people. There's a whole channel dedicated to it 🤣 the difference comes in the intent. Channel does Polaroids and gives then to the person. Always positive responses. Again INTENT is key. And it also matters if youre ugly or attractive. Its creepy for ugly dudes to do it but if a cute guy does It...its fine 🤣

[@Op3ium_]

What does taking photos gotta do with breaking into her car 😂

[@user-yu7up9vg3z]

In real life they have no legal right to do what they're doing it's called the first amendment he can take pictures of whoever and whatever he wants to from a public space regardless of how anyone feels and the cops have no legal authority to do what they're doing in this scene

[@simonedegroot905]

Isn't it that because of someone feeling threatened, stalked or if the guy is being a public nuisance or if there's reasonable suspicion they can do something?

[@sinlordpink8147]

No. That's not true. Depending on the state, this can very much be illegal. For example, this show is set in a two-party consent state, which would make it against the law to actively record a specific individual like he's doing without their consent.

[@warflame5912]

​​@@sinlordpink8147 pretty sure a two party consent law only prohibits secretly recording conversations, not taking pictures of someone. Also, in the US specifically, you have a constitutional right to take pictures of anyone or anything, including private property or government building or people and anything that is viewable from public property and police aren't allowed to interfere.

[@WilliamL-vj9ed]

Dam yall out here lawyering and I’m here trying to figure out wtf is going on

[@Supreme_Dalek_]

That is not what the first amendment is.

[@rileyfang]

What episode

[@styxx5613]

Yeah she doesnt get to detain him. There is no proof he did any crime. Thats a lawsuit. Even if a warrent then comes what they find will be inadmissible because the original detainment was unlawful. Kidnapping basically.

[@iowagreen8932]

Stalking is a crime.

[@silvos8903]

​@@iowagreen8932They have no proof he had even been around her. Even if the warrant comes and the pictures prove something, it will all be tossed out. There is no lawful expectation of privacy in public. You can be photographed and recorded and there's nothing you can do about it.

[@joshuagiehll3737]

1 stalking is a crime 2 she has recieved death threats, that's why the police are keeping an eye on her. 3 the one officer watched him take photos of her and bases on his responses acting really suspicious. Arguably the cops wouldn't even need a warrant.

[@robertramsey653]

​@@silvos8903fruit of the poisonous tree.

[@hosiercraft9675]

Looks like a blatant violation of the 4th amendment to me

[@TheAussielotl]

im gonna come take pictures of you without your consent :)

[@morgancason7156]

Which is why they are going to get a warrant

[@robertramsey653]

​@morgancason7156 only because she got called out.

[@morgancason7156]

@@robertramsey653 yes, but she asked to see his camera and he was likely gonna give to her until they told him he didn't have unless she had a warrant as we see she didn't take it by force

[@NoIDontActuallyLiveInSeattle]

This is why I despise KZbinrs who go around openly filming places and people and then who get irate when questioned about it. Like it’s obviously suspicious behavior. You’re doing it for views. 😅 annoying

[@Flex_v7]

Show name?

[@RoamerMovie-su5os]

Show: The rookie

[@cheetoesfrank5131]

It's not unreasonable, he's suspected of a crime and so it's reasonable for them to get his camera. If the camera is locked like how a phone can be locked they need a warrant, but otherwise not.

[@magicplayer3001]

Good thing the weak yoga teacher and her wife don’t have a job after this for interfering in cop’s business