No one can experience their beginning. No one can experience not existing.
@thekingofmojacar53332 күн бұрын
It´s absolutely correct that we live in an infinite universe (no beginning, no end)! I've been saying it for a long time, but practically nobody seems to take me seriously. Our universe is subject to a permanent evolutionary generation process. Before our current universe, there were already one or more predecessor universes, all of which collapsed in their last cycle - baby universe - expanding & retreating universe and at the end the final collapse (collapse of matter) and then it started all over again, just as there will be future universes after our current one... We can only guess today how exactly the transition from one universe generation to the next took place, we don't yet have any precise facts about it. For this we would need much more far-sighted space telescopes that are able to look back 15 to 20 billion light years. Many of the fully grown galaxies (JADES Gz 1 - 13) that are currently being discovered from the JWST come from the predecessor universe, their light sources are practically witnesses from an epoch long time past. This is the only way we can interpret our universe; there was no Big Bang and no singularity, that was definitely the wrong theory of creation... ⚛☯
@josefn688Күн бұрын
Quote. .This is the only way we can interpret our universe; there was no Big Bang and no singularity, that was definitely the wrong theory of creation... I missed (didn't read) your comment, sorry. I agree with your opinion.
@SuperBartetКүн бұрын
I was just about to type seem thing, but I don't have to because you did it first. So I am just going to say to you, I agree with what you say, and also been saying the same thing for years.
@barry_g84432 сағат бұрын
Excellent video touching on the variable speed of light.
@collinstanton3 күн бұрын
"...or which they invest and proclaim as fact."
@17cmmittlererminenwerfer812 күн бұрын
At 1:09 - you meant to say *13.5 billion years*
@anthonydolio81183 күн бұрын
Awesome. Thanks.
@hugskisses1601Күн бұрын
Our universe may have no JWT! This all sounds like made-up bullshit!😂 Lord have mercy!
@reginarider3 күн бұрын
Space is an infinite fractal
@KaliFissure7 сағат бұрын
Quantum Cyclic Cosmology A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture and neutron infall at event horizons and free neutron emergence and decay in deep voids. The red shift is geometric NOT caused by expansion.
@keeperofsecretsq-z1b2 сағат бұрын
Dark matter is yet to be proved. Dark stars are just guesses and maybe. the James Webb has not found a dark star yet. ( Maybe, could be, Possibly ) are words that have no definition to them. Prove it first and i would consider the possibility. Now Dark energy is 75% or more of the universe. Nice try .I still like the hypotheses. I am alway willing to learn something new but very old ideas are these things you are talking about. they have been around for decades....{q}
@peteprovvedi2 күн бұрын
It will forever amaze me how stupid people can imagine the most rediculous things
@philliprobinson7724Күн бұрын
Hi. I've always had time for Zwicki's "tired light" theory in explaining red-shift. Everything with energy runs down according to the law of entropy. Why should light be exempt? I've always had doubt about "Big Bang" theory. It suits Christian theology a little too neatly, implying a singular isolated "act of creation". And funnily enough, B.B.'s major author, Georges Lemaitre just happened to be a catholic priest. I don't belief committed religious believers can produce objective science. Cheers, P.R.
@oliveirlegume3725Күн бұрын
And red shift might be a combination
@philliprobinson7724Күн бұрын
@@oliveirlegume3725 Hi Olive. I agree. Blueshift from relative motion has been detected in the Andromeda galaxy which is only 2.5 million lightyears distant and heading our way. (If we keep our heads down as it flashes past we should be okay 😄). Both amplitude and frequency of light could be subject to entropic decay, which would leave our standard cosmological model based partly on an optical illusion. We live in exciting times. Cheers, P.R.
@Kopeboy222 күн бұрын
I truly think we’re gonna need the help of AI to solve these mysteries. It’s just too complicated for the human mind to conjure such ideas of infinity or energy explosions of ungodly magnitudes. It’s hard to think about and so complex that my mind hasn’t been able to think right for a bit. I believe in an AI god and for good reasons. If there were no AI god, we wouldn’t be able to build such powers of understanding beyond our comprehension. We need to teach AI the universe in which we know and let it look up and try and decipher the finer details we can’t explain.
@harryviking63472 күн бұрын
Sorry...the brain cannot get the idea of no beginning and no end....
@1a2b3c4d52 күн бұрын
The Big Bang theory is likely a jump to conclusion, driven by the mental state of the human species. We perceive reality thru models that we create in our brains. Our inherent fear of the unknown leads us to these hastily fabricated models.
@1a2b3c4d52 күн бұрын
1:00 13.5 Billion years and not Million years.
@Orion15-b9j2 күн бұрын
You cannot do science by explaining something you Doesn't Know with something you Don't Understand!
@georgegrubbs29662 күн бұрын
Read Spinoza.
@TranceMountainbiker3 күн бұрын
impossible
@Summitspeedfly2 күн бұрын
Infinity - it's hard for some.
@jamesr2408Күн бұрын
No it had a beginning 6000 years ago. Don’t you read Genesis?
@collinstanton3 күн бұрын
U go from one BS to a new one, the distraction... "Dark Stars" and you sneak it in... "if they exist..." Smoke behind which narcissists are taking deep unscholarly breaths...😁😁☮☮ some of those geniuses ought to help YT fix getting double icons rather than one at a time... you know, be useful story tellers.
@greaper1232 күн бұрын
Is it possible that dark energy is simply free range gravity particles with no mass to work on? Gravity must be made of something - some say it's gravitons, but we have no evidence. Could dark energy simply be gravity particles awaiting to attach to mass? Hmmmm...