An interesting consequence in this design is that when playing both sides the card played is a Wizard Action Lightning Instant, making Negate (Aetherize) effects much better.
@niccolopaqueo5833 ай бұрын
Great video DM! I can now say that my name has appeared in one of your videos! Keep healthy and I'll see you soon!
@supermarioblacktiger3 ай бұрын
Makes sense to me
@shoichi84743 ай бұрын
LSS: There is priority between resolutions. Wizard Players: ::twirls mustache::
@playtimetcg3 ай бұрын
Wizard math is hard
@ValariaxSword3 ай бұрын
Some of my favorite TCG cards have been split cards like Fire // Ice for example. I actually like them adding this but I get the criticism that they are copying MTG to a degree when doing this.
@burstflames3 ай бұрын
I am 100% i would love to meet u and say hi
@darth_prentiss3 ай бұрын
Doin’ the Lord’s work here. 🤘😎
@finlamor3 ай бұрын
Do you reveal both sides when fusing or just the talented side? They've already shown two oscillio cards with the name "shock" but i guess this will only matter if they print two playable shock cards with the same color
@DMArmada3 ай бұрын
@@finlamor yes, you play the card down and announce which of the two sides you're using. The card is visible, however.
@michaelc68173 ай бұрын
A split card that you are inclined to tip sideways to read is not really a good idea. Oops, I just tilted the card sideways, now my opponent thinks it must be a split card. Now I have to always tip cards sideways to keep my opponent guessing. Any card could be a split card. It's already not good that this set excludes ninjas, warriors, brutes, guardians, rangers, mechanologists, and assassins (think Bright Lights), but adding a potentially confusing unpopular split card design from MTG at the same time will possibly not be well received.
@calebhaney64513 ай бұрын
So does Volzar, the lighting rod, consider the meld card as one card when melded? For the amp X effect?
@ethanhair14603 ай бұрын
It should
@DMArmada3 ай бұрын
@@calebhaney6451 it should, yes
@christofferandersen19062 ай бұрын
right to left is weird, it would be more intuitive if it was left to right.
@tam-ka-blam97363 ай бұрын
Not a wizard or runeblade player, but with the meld cards the left side says action but the right side says it is an instant. Wouldn't Aether Wildfire only affect the action portion of the card if you meld both sides since it mentions only action cards?
@DMArmada3 ай бұрын
@@tam-ka-blam9736 The card itself is an action card and just like the rules reprise states, is considered an action card with two effects
@tam-ka-blam97363 ай бұрын
@@DMArmada Ok I know you can just activate the right side by itself as an instant, but that gets confusing when you activate both that it changes to be just an action even though both triggers happen seperately. It would make more sense to me if it was just 2 spells combined into one like an instant followed by an action.
@DMArmada3 ай бұрын
@@tam-ka-blam9736 when you mailed it, think of it like you're playing a singular card that has its first effect activating it instant speed. It is still classified as an action card however
@Zerschnitzler773 ай бұрын
what about cards like heart of fyendal? 5 value, that card is 400-500$ by the release of the new set
@DMArmada3 ай бұрын
@@Zerschnitzler77 how is that affected by split cards?
@Mortanux3 ай бұрын
Didnt like them in MTG not looking for using this
@GoblinReserve3 ай бұрын
Not really a fan of the card layout as it obviously feels too much of a straight MTG ripoff. Also not a fan of how confusing it is, but maybe I’m just old and dumb😅.
@primozin3 ай бұрын
I didn't like it at all. Killed the card design, and added an unnecessary complexity to the game flow. It is just SUPER WEIRD.
@Mortanux3 ай бұрын
yeah just like when it was done in MTG, I made an already at times filled card with text even smaller and just lose any flavour image, a bad idea copied allas