This is why scientists tend to be atheists

[@krishcshah]

The sheer effort you put into explaining what evidence is with patience. Props to you 🙌

[@scienceisdope]

Thanks man!!

[@krishnatyagi9881]

@@scienceisdope hello bro what is your take on buddha

[@SudeepKS]

@@scienceisdope I really like your videos... I am intrigued by the Vedas... And as Carl Sagan says we Indians have the tradition of skeptical questioning and unselfconscious humility before the great cosmic mysteries. What do you think about this ? Nasadiya Sukta (Hymn of non-Eternity, origin of universe): There was neither non-existence nor existence then; Neither the realm of space, nor the sky which is beyond; What stirred? Where? In whose protection? There was neither death nor immortality then; No distinguishing sign of night nor of day; That One breathed, windless, by its own impulse; Other than that there was nothing beyond. Darkness there was at first, by darkness hidden; Without distinctive marks, this all was water; That which, becoming, by the void was covered; That One by force of heat came into being; Who really knows? Who will here proclaim it? Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? Gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe. Who then knows whence it has arisen? Whether God's will created it, or whether He was mute; Perhaps it formed itself, or perhaps it did not; Only He who is its overseer in highest heaven knows, Only He knows, or perhaps He does not know.

[@errrrrshhhhh]

@@krishnatyagi9881 I think there is huge diffrence btw buddha and buddhism,buddha was rational but buddhism is not.

[@montysaini8602]

@@scienceisdope We now know cellular structure of creatures. We have created artificials cells in labs but have never been able to create that spark which starts life chemically. I am not talking about a complex animal or something, just a unicellular creature created by man. A question for those who beleive science is absolute and there is no pushing force that lead our planet to be habitable and create such a huge ecosystem of flora and fauna, where everything is perfect and complements each other. Can you create something artificially that nature was able to create out of nothing ? Life ?

[@vishwakumar2864]

9:31 If anyone is confused that why cant "person not getting cured even after eating the apple" be used as falsification , its because the statement says "may be cured" , not "will be cured for sure" . "May be", "probably" , "I think so" are unfalsifiable statements . They can be used for expressing probabilities or possibilities , but not for making claims .

[@theadarshguy]

Maybe God do exist 😅

[@vishwakumar2864]

@@theadarshguy yep just like that 😝. Another example : may be the creator is a cruel and sadistic devil

[@Void_from_Abyss]

@@vishwakumar2864 not maybe but sure 😂

[@vishwakumar2864]

@@Void_from_Abyss shh 🤫 ! Saying that would shift the burden of proof on us . And also it would imply that we admit that creator exists . Saying this 👇 would put us on safe side : "We have not found evidence for creator's existence, so it is irrational to blindly believe in it"

[@Void_from_Abyss]

@@vishwakumar2864 I know god doesn't exist but if you observe movement of atom that is going order to disorder then you realise that we are already living in hell I mean observe in everything every F single thing is going order to disorder for example: your bed room always gets dirty (disorder) to clean you have you to put energy by yourself to keep it clean (order) observe this in everything If you think about it deeply then you realise that God doesn't exist but if it is then this reality is hell made by devil

[@Varun4_here]

I feel even if there's any existence of God, I swear not a single religion exactly know about it 😂😂.

[@rudra20048]

That's agnostic mean. A person believe God exist but don't follow any current religion

[@Varun4_here]

@@rudra20048 Is it available anywhere on paper to opt as religion ??

[@rudra20048]

@@Varun4_here not in India but in west yes

[@damianedwards8827]

It’s Unfortunate. God is simply the Existence of Love Everybody Believes Love exists Atheists unnecessary overcomplicate it It’s a Shame

[@Varun4_here]

@@damianedwards8827 name a religion which states existence of love as idea of God ?? Islam demands to recognise Muhammad, Christianity demands to only follow Jesus. That's the problem with religion that having virtues or good values could be one of the many features but just having a good virtue and moral values is never enough.

[@kumarnarayana5105]

Scientists look for answers. Religions hide the questions. Simple !

[@zzodysseuszz]

Uhm no. Religious people do. Religion doesn’t need to hide question, it’s philosophical in nature. It answers most question. Just bc you can’t get answers from one religious person doesn’t mean studying the religion won’t eventually get you the answers. Why is everyone in this comment section such unreasonably anti-religious zealots

[@gautamsaha6368]

Riga veda start with a line 'keep asking questions ' in brief the gita is a q & a btw krishan and arjun hide the question plz elaborate 😀😀

[@bhaveshtochabbra6853]

@@gautamsaha6368 he meant islam and Christianity which are based on blind belief and no question can be asked.

[@dr.viktor5291]

@@bhaveshtochabbra6853 do u think believing in thousands of gods isn't blind

[@bhaveshtochabbra6853]

@@dr.viktor5291 if you think an average hindu believe in thousand gods and worship them regularly. Bro you need to learn about hindiusm more. Second, God in hindiusm doesnt force people to believe in it and dump disbelievers in hell eternally. Hindiusm is more of karma based rather than belief based religon.

[@Paaaaaaaaaaal]

Proud to see Dr. Saha in thumbnail, he is probably most underrated scientist from India.

[@souravdebnath5339]

Seriously bhai.

[@unimo9949]

Where is sadguru ?

[@bhimanjali]

Also he was a dalit and in india dalits are always ignored ,.... Meghnand Saha was a kohinoor ❤️

[@spyboy0076]

@@bhimanjali sahas are bengali merchant class not dalit.

[@manicsane7465]

Bro, I have a video on him in my channel..... I am a small KZbinr. I make videos on science. Please help bro...🙏🙏🙏

[@Dr.PrettyPsychiatrist]

One of the brilliant KZbin channels in todays time when reels and shorts are feeding on the dopamine pathway and decreasing the scientific temperament of the youth. This channel Deserves much more!! 🌸🌸

[@AarvinMS]

Do you think it's some kind of a purposeful concerted effort to dumb down the public by feeding such things into their brains ?

[@anonymouscode1635]

Freedom in thought, pursuit of wonder ,aperture

[@sumanagopinath]

Honestly, one of your best videos so far. Loved it. I am sure some people might still come back and say things like “we do not need science to prove one’s belief.” Or “somethings do not need proof” or “Modern Science has not reached to that stage yet” or whatever. These things should be taught in schools in my opinion. I wonder why no one teaches about evidence in schools. Isn’t that like the basis of science? How are we not teaching this to our kids?

[@scienceisdope]

Thanks a lot!!

[@ankushds7018]

The video isn't even up yet

[@scienceisdope]

@@ankushds7018 she's a channel patron. She already saw

[@krishcshah]

It's because of this lack of rational thinking people can end up saying things like "not everything is about science" or "our ancestors were ahead of today's science" among other condensing beliefs.

[@theologyrationality6556]

The entire video is based on an assumption that natural science is the parameter to judge what Exists and what doesn't. You are asking the wrong question, god's existence cannot be proved by science, you are asking empirical proof for something that cannot be proved empirically. The question for god's existence belongs to philosophy not to natural science. For eg using natural science you can't even prove that there is an external world independent of mind, nor can you prove that people other than yourself have 'mind'. Such questions belongs to philosophers not scientists because science works on physical objects it cannot go beyond it. Now there have been many scientists who believed in God, Einstein, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, bohrs,etc

[@shankhanita]

honestly, your channel is one of the best youtube channel i've came across so far, one of my friend recommended me your "how beerbiceps finds science in spirituality" and I got so interested, that I almost checked out all your vids, thank you so much for taking a step forward towards making us believe that science is REALLY dope.

[@cannibal6420]

I'm sure the haters are gonna swarm here . Pranav we love your content man .

[@ankushds7018]

Wouldn't expect anything else. No matter how f-ed up someone's opinions are, we'll deal with everything in the spirit of science!

[@nishantshade668]

If you want to stand by Science, you have to accept criticism. Otherwise you better stick to Pseudoscience.

[@cannibal6420]

@Cynic yezz , I accidentally typed critism instead of haters .

[@Xaphan01]

@@nishantshade668 well said my man

[@Yo-bk4dk]

Your*

[@maheshdocherla]

Thanks!

[@patricksperspective99]

That intro alone 👏🏿 "Your beliefs are your own" Live and let live people

[@sagarsrivastava1629]

yup that what we should do....religion should be a personal thing...why to force on other

[@hkay01]

10:56 No offense but the monkey model has already been labelled as wrong and is denied in Scientific Communities. They use a different type of evolutionary model which is similar to an horse on how we evolved (Not saying we are related to horses). Love you Videos and appreciate your work man. India really need some lecture on Science.

[@Chopped_Liver]

Yes you are right That model is misleading Because it portraits evolution as a level up process but evolution is a branching process

[@hkay01]

@@Chopped_Liver Yup, the branching model. I forgot the name and thanks for the reminder.

[@sai_69]

Yeah it's kinda misleading

[@sniper74839]

Source?

[@Chopped_Liver]

@@sniper74839 it's in every Bio book

[@pradyunmore6727]

Hey Pranav, great video as always! I have always argued with people having irrational, pseudoscientific beliefs and i always find it difficult to gather as much patience as you did while explaining all that you explained in this video. Hats off to you for that! You paraphrased Stephen Hawking at 17:15 in the video! In Stephen Hawking's book 'A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME', chapter 1 "Our Picture of the Universe" page 1, there are the words "but why do we think we know better"! And i'm happy to see you adhering to the philosophy that those words teach us; not meeting any question/statement/belief with ridicule but to actually provide a complete explanation for it to that person, no matter how stubborn that person is in accepting it. i highly recommend you and everybody else here to read that book if you haven't already, since that book doesn't delve much into calculations but simply improves your understanding of science and ultimately, moulds you into asking more and more questions about the world around us.

[@stutihem5358]

Some of us are so heavily indoctrinated since birth, that the gradual process towards questioning our beliefs and the transition towards agnosticism/atheism is super painful. When all we've been taught regarding our purpose, aim, happiness, peace, well being is god, and we no more identify as theists, the whole structure of validation comes down. Religious trauma is as real as it gets,esp if you're coming from a extremist/radical systems. Sometimes we wish we remained in the blissfully ignorant status quo of the past, bcz the ostracization from our own families/relations is unprecedented. Atheism is therefore a painful choice in our country, in our families who know no opinion that is not communally inclined. Our questions are termed as a work of the devil, or an influence of demons. Your channel gives ones like us the validation that we crave for, amidst the name calling and demonization that we face. Please keep it up 💘

[@doofenshmirtz849]

Yes exactly. Its called manipulation

[@GigaChad-kg1om]

You're undoubtedly the best KZbinr in India. You have no idea how relieved I am to know that there are people like you here. You explained scientific method awesomely.

[@meesumnaqui7930]

Thanks Pranav. I learned a lot from your videos. I am a math teacher but unfortunately can't share these videos with my students.

[@ravienraven625]

@Dalit Shiv the parents of the students maybe religious and he most important thing "WE ARE IN INDIA" and yk what it means

[@targetstudies9007]

Science is something that allow something to make it false , Whereas religions said something to be true and you can't question it ! . That's the thing that make science trustfull ! . That's why humanity becoming advance by adopting science ! .

[@drrohanfonseca]

Very well put Pranav. I believe there is place for belief in God. Life has this tendency to throw a curve ball and things can get so sad and miserable that only the belief in a higher power can give us hope, so that we can pull through. But organized religion though meh. It always comes in the garb of spreading love, but in reality is a tool to manipulate people emotionally for monetary gain.

[@quicksilverop1362]

Exactly, my thoughts

[@naveenjain7717]

crisp and precise

[@quantisednerd703]

I personally believe religion and gods as a source of morals and ethics which we must learn to impart in life, unless we consider it as a means to change our fortunes, treat our diseases or anything that involves contradicting with the practical things we are capable of doing ourselves.

[@Rahul-Jain]

Shout out to your efforts, but in criticism I want to say you lack perception, you have blocked your mind of any question which do not fall under scientific parlance and which don't come under evaluation of scientific method. theist and atheist both are same. philosophically i would say being skeptic is good and its even a natural human tendency but after some time it will make you tired because it will not lead you to all answers. science is just limited to physical aspect of universe. why someone wants to limit their thinking and prison themselves in smallness of logic and to scientific methods. yes science has achieved many things but science knows nothing about origin or end of anything but explaining something which is in between, it is just revolving around circumference and not touching its core. science just consider physical aspect of life but what about emotional, consciousness and beingness of life itself, what about most fundamental questions of life like who am I or meaning of life. it is unable to answers them because its lacks clarity and perception beyond physical. if you believe in science it would become a religion, if you limit yourself to just to some theories of science you are doing a crime towards human potential of brain. have scientific acumen but not like this otherwise being scientific would just be a ideocracy towards one's own self.

[@eusuntdracule3934]

@@Rahul-Jain I agree, people like these believe in practical things which isn't wrong but are too one sided or very close minded regarding the other aspects of life. Science is limited only to the physical reality but can't fully explain everything about this material reality, science as a tool keeps changing or updating but I still don't think it will ever precisely answer how it all started & how or when it will end. They key here is to question everything but not criticize every single thing which is not scientifically answerable.

[@PankajNaharpali]

What can be claimed without proof can be denied without proof.

[@nemesis2767]

😂😂😂 nice man

[@emceekafka]

'You hurt my sentiments by saying that the flying spaghetti monster doesn't exist , do you have 'meatballs' to prove that it doesn't exist ?'

[@sharwari24]

Your videos are awesome. And specially this one is a masterpiece. I don't know how to prove this scientifically but after learning history, philosophy and the nature of science, i can say this empirically. 😃 I seriously appreciate the efforts you put in for making people aware about scientific thinking. I hope this reaches to many people and they learn how to think.

[@harshitha3376]

Hey! Pranav, this video is absolutely fantastic. You have really explained everything with such simplicity...great job as always :)

[@Vasu-qn6kj]

Brilliant content pranav! We need more people like you! Keep up the good work❤️

[@uditmnair]

One of the most underrated channel. Rooting for you because hey science is dope and everyone should witness the grandeur of pursuit of knowledge.

[@Lunarplex]

Absolutely fantastic video! You really explained this with such simplicity. I’ve attempted it before but I don’t think I’ve managed to do the topic as much justice as you have. Awesome work!

[@rahman8696]

Hey Pranav,great and quality work. A worthy Indian creator in science and other areas. And yes we got very same taste!

[@Abdullah-mn6sw]

When I saw the censored written, I thought "oog intersting, wonder whose religious symbol is controversial". Later realised it was my own religion, lol.

[@SomethingaboutScreens]

Where?

[@Abdullah-mn6sw]

@@SomethingaboutScreens Next to Jesus

[@urgenlama7302]

Little knowledge is dangerous bro, Buddhist doesn't consider Lord Buddha as Creator God nor they think there is any creator Capital GOD , who created this world .According to Buddhism every phenomenon arises due to various cause and effects.

[@youcancanyou]

That's some great content right here. I sent this on my family whatsapp group, now I'm not a part of the family group.

[@risingaditya4206]

Science is the logical analysis of the items existing in this creation based on only one authority that is perception (Pratyaksha Pramanam). Even in the ancient logic, all the authorities (Pramanas) are based on perception only. You see the fire giving smoke. This is deduction or perception. When you see the smoke coming from a distance and do not see the fire, you say that fire exists there and this is induction or inference (Anumana Pramanam). But this induction is based on your previous deduction only. Somebody says to you that fire gives smoke. If that person is your dearest, you believe it and infer the fire from the smoke. This is authority of word ‘Shabdha Pramanam’. Though you have not seen the fire, your dearest person has seen the smoke coming from fire. Like this all the authorities are based on perception only. I do not find any scripture of any Religion, which contradicts the experience of perception. There are four ways of authority. 1) Sruthi, which is the original scripture. 2) Smrithi, which is the commentaries of Scholars on the original scripture. 3) Yukthi, the logical analysis based on deduction, induction etc., 4) Anubhava, the experience based on the perception of the items in this world, which may be direct or indirect. Out of these four ways, the fourth way is the most powerful. If anything contradicts the fourth way, that is not valid or it may be a misinterpretation based on misunderstanding of the Sruthi or Smrithi or Yukthi. Thus Science and Philosophy are not separate. The very frame of the spiritual knowledge is Science only. Thus Science is the basic foundation and over all underlying structure of all the Scriptures. A true Scientist should always stand on the perception and should not deny the experience derived by perception. If he denies, he is not a scientist. All top most scientists were philosophers and spiritual people only. Those scientists have travelled along the river of Science and reached its end, which is the ocean of spiritual knowledge called as philosophy. Philosophy is pervading all the branches of Science. Every branch of Science gives Ph.D as the final degree. Ph.D means Doctor in Philosophy. If Science and philosophy are different,why this word philosophy is regarded so much by all the branches of science ? Philosophy means the essence of knowledge of every branch that is experienced when one reaches at the end of branch. Therefore, the spiritual knowledge, which is the ocean, is the Philosophy in which all branches of Science and all the Religions merge and loose their identity. A scientist who has not reached the end of Science and who is still traveling in the river only denies the existence of the ocean, since he is still perceiving the limiting boundaries of his knowledge - river. Such river-travelers are called as atheists.

[@yecto1332]

Make this video viral This is the basic things some Indians need to learn

[@scottdemarest9315]

Great content. Glad there are people all over the world spreading this message.

[@adityanrajesh2634]

Glad that you put Meghnad Saha in the Thumbnail. He is one of the most underrated Scientists of India.

[@fardinkhan09999]

Little knowledge of science makes you an atheist But in depth of knowledge makes you beleive in god

[@mangeshchalan8786]

You got deep knowledge?

[@DeepakKumar-cy7jv]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 dinosaur 🦕

[@pavanshankar8010]

What about the great Ramanujan? CV Raman, Aryabhatta , Abdul Kalam etc? Not all scientists were atheists. Including great sages like shrushruta.

[@jrStorm-ym9kq]

God word was dedicated for tathagat ☑️

[@footballbestmomentsclip]

Amazing explanation! Amazing work Pranav. Love from BANGLADESH

[@RMoves]

This channel is gold! So glad I came across it 🙌🏻

[@jiteshsharma8306]

Please don't use this 10:56 picture for Theory of evolution, it's false, it makes people think that we have evolved from monkeys/chimps, whereas theory states that humans and chimps had a common ancestor. Please use the correct picture where evolution is shown as tree branches. BTW, i like your videos, keep posting amazing videos. Thanks.

[@nihiln1343]

Thanks

[@varunnikam]

Tomorrow this video is going to be more interesting after looking at the comments of religious people. Damn 🔥 Edit- We already watched the video yesterday.

[@scienceisdope]

Lol 3 hours to go!

[@dheerajb1883]

Good precaution against Sadguru fans' whataboutery in thumbnail🤣

[@varunnikam]

@@scienceisdope yess

[@kritikagaur8248]

Amazing video man! The way you explained things in such a simple and well thaught out manner is really appreciated. Keep it up my guy! 👍👍👍

[@anuraganand8649]

"Scientists tend to be Atheists" but some scientists of India supported pseudoscience. I've heard a video in which Dawkins was saying that there was a Biologist who believed evolution never happened and life on earth started 5000 years ago. And people use these scientists as authoritative figures to justify their pseudoscience. A lot of noble-prize winner scientists used to believe in pseudo-science and people used to justify it as authority of science.

[@potentialpresident]

0:26 why the second image is censored

[@jharanagiri2195]

The statement that God works in a mysterious way is unfalsifiable as - if we decode the way then the mystery is decoded and then they will bring on more and more example to decode and will say these are the ones which are able to decode but there are some which we cannot decode

[@paramdongre5549]

I'm so glad your channel is getting recognition it deserves 👏, finally we might get a community of rationalist

[@dharmeshparikh7837]

Amazing video man although one thing I am still not sure you said at last is true or not because interestingly I find many famous scientists who were or are religious like numerous not one or two, Aryabhatta, Ramanujan, Michael Faraday, James Clerk Maxwell, Erwin Schrödinger, A.P.J Abdul Kalam, Vikram Sarabhai, Werner Heisenberg, Robert Boyle, Max Planck, John Dalton ,Carl Friedrich Gauss, J. J. Thomson, Manjul Bhargava, Christian Anfinsen 😅 And the list goes on & on. So it's difficult to conclude whether majority of scientists are atheist or not. As an atheist I would prefer that kind of thinking in all good scientists but at the end that's doesn't matter if they are contributing something good or revolutionary inventions whether they are theist or atheist. Awesome video keep making these kind of content love to see more of your content. 👍

[@Nothing-yo5uo]

We can also not deny that there are many scientists who are influenced by Upnishads and Tao te Ching.

[@dharmeshparikh7837]

@Varun thanks man for sharing your point of view on this. could also suggest any of those research paper title or name I would love to read about that .

[@errrrrshhhhh]

Being believing on religious god and believing on creator is quite diffrent thing .Mostly who believe on god is not about personal god or gods from scripture,they may believe on creator may be they are deist.

[@dharmeshparikh7837]

@Darshana Ambulkar thanks for providing info regarding royal society. Could you also share some reference link or page name for research paper I would like to read that. So basically you mean to say modern scientists are mostly agnostic or atheist. And about mentioning of past scientists well I mentioned those because Pranav also mentioned past scientists mostly in his video like Karl Sagan Stephan Hawkins, C.V Raman they are considered past only not current. 😅 If you define any specific era for scientists then I would have included that but anyway that doesn't matter.

[@Rahul-Jain]

Shout out to your efforts, but in criticism I want to say you lack perception, you have blocked your mind of any question which do not fall under scientific parlance and which don't come under evaluation of scientific method. theist and atheist both are same. philosophically i would say being skeptic is good and its even a natural human tendency but after some time it will make you tired because it will not lead you to all answers. science is just limited to physical aspect of universe. why someone wants to limit their thinking and prison themselves in smallness of logic and to scientific methods. yes science has achieved many things but science knows nothing about origin or end of anything but explaining something which is in between, it is just revolving around circumference and not touching its core. science just consider physical aspect of life but what about emotional, consciousness and beingness of life itself, what about most fundamental questions of life like who am I or meaning of life. it is unable to answers them because its lacks clarity and perception beyond physical. if you believe in science it would become a religion, if you limit yourself to just to some theories of science you are doing a crime towards human potential of brain. have scientific acumen but not like this otherwise being scientific would just be a ideocracy towards one's own self.

[@shubhamsharma2708]

Salute to this man . For a very long time I had certain questions in my mind your videos give me idea and new perspective to look at them in a logical way. Thankyou.

[@Sagar_shetti]

0:26 which one is that censored religion?

[@lemonboy21]

Might be Islam idk

[@abdullaahyusuf782]

"Little science takes you away from God but more of it takes you to Him." ~ Louis Pasteur

[@aarthiramesh4584]

The last "why do most people believe in god?" , I was literally thinking about this today and giving the answers to myself as same as what you told in this video. And In most cases caste/ religion leading to war , discrimination and oppression.🤕 Nice video 👏 keep your work up man. It's needed 💯

[@kapilbisht1811]

Lenin ,stallion ,mao they were not rigious than why they massacred million of people's ?

[@aarthiramesh4584]

@@kapilbisht1811 Lenin, Stalin, mao aren't religious but they were strongly dictated with some other ideology. Blind faith in any means is bliss in ignorance!! being atheistic doesn't mean you're good in all ways and having pure heart. In fact, there are people who do more harm to others indirectly in name of some metaphysical indoctrination. Being theist doesn't mean you're cruel and becoming atheist doesn't mean you're an empath. It has all to do with ignorance.

[@kapilbisht1811]

@@aarthiramesh4584 thts exactly m saying ,just bcz u said religious people do discrimination so I replied , Nd yeah but religious people stuck with their religious doctrine,nd it's all about peace nd love

[@aarthiramesh4584]

@@kapilbisht1811 yup! 👍

[@adarshashok8138]

Been waiting for someone to post this video for a longtime. Now finally during any argument about athiesm all I need to do is to send link of your videos. Me as a person who believes in science and nature is fed up of people alienating me.

[@yecto1332]

This is the basic things that all indian school system should have taught before teaching science I found that, after studying science so many of indian student who learned science are just making non-sense claims I just get infuriate seeing these people

[@anish6060]

Bro what about newton, Einstein, tesla, ramanujan, Galileo and various other great scientists....

[@raptzar1148]

@DELTA DEFENCE Einstein was Tesla was agnostic Galileo was charged with false accusations of calling earth round by jews back then Newton belived in Christianity but he is over 600 years old ramunjan never opened much on religious topic but he did say he worship maths more then anything

[@Chopped_Liver]

Old time Justice by popes in church You deny the existence means you are reincarnation of Satan Then death sentences I'll recommend the book "Pale Blue Dot - A vision of the human future in space"

[@PurushNahiMahaPurush]

The thing is, even if scientists were religious, that doesn't prove anything about the religion being true or even the existence of God. Scientists are also humans and therefore are prone to all human weaknesses. Religious preaches use their quotes about spirituality as a stamp of approval from the scientific community about their religion, but those are just the belief of 1 person. Unless they provide verifiable evidence, the existence of God is as real as the existence of Santa Claus.

[@bladerize]

You mentioned Bertrand Russell's flying teapot analogy. Impressive. 👍🏻

[@shubhamsharma9671]

Hi Pranav great video as always. Please make a detailed video on Adam's bridge.

[@anirban7493]

I'm making my family to sit and watch this video. I'm from a Bengali family that has the culture of reading great works of literature, I grew up seeing my mom and dad always reading something, so I naturally developed a hobby of reading books but being a science enthusiast by book shelf only consisted of non fictions like "A Brief History of Time", "The Origin of Species" and many more. I later became an atheist after reading some of these books and my book shelf later was joined by books like "The God Delusion", "God is Not Great" and so on. My family never had any problems with me being an atheist..

[@deathstroke9944]

Don't force 'em, the intention of the video is not to sermonize atheism or question others beliefs

[@Chopped_Liver]

Bro you have 1st edition on "The origin of species" ?

[@anirban7493]

@@deathstroke9944 I'm not forcing anyone or asking them to change their beliefs... I only will insist them to watch this video to let them know when an idea or statement is called scientific...

[@jrStorm-ym9kq]

Govt should provide a option of Non-religious Atheist, agnostic, Humanity etc also.

[@idioticmonkey]

Honestly, I believe that religion and science are two different things, and should be treated as such.

[@YoursTrulyGod]

Science is explanation of reality, if God's existence is false by science then it simply means it doesn't exist

[@idioticmonkey]

To whoever replied, please send ur comment again. I cannot see it cuz utube is shit

[@pranay_dixit]

9:30 In the video, you say "can" while the text on screen says "may". That caused a lot of confusion for me.

[@sai_69]

Same

[@parthasarathyparandaman3704]

Finally something to send to family members when they ask me why I an Atheist!!!

[@rudra20048]

@DELTA DEFENCE I am Atheist because Hinduism didn't treat me equally . Most Atheist are dalits who were discriminated. You guys want to keep Dalit in Hinduism and continue to discriminate

[@rudra20048]

Tell your family to turn on TV. Current situation of country is enough to convince them

[@parthasarathyparandaman3704]

@DELTA DEFENCE you are wrong. I am not an atheist because it sounds cool, I am an atheist because based on facts presented to me I have come to conclude that there is no God and the other thing is even if there is a God I don't think I will worship that God as I have a lot of problems with organised religion itself. And to the fact that I will pray when there's something horrible that happens to me or the people around me is also not true in my case as the pandemic years have not been that great for me or my family and I didn't turn to god but to doctors and medical professionals who can help me.

[@quantisednerd703]

@@rudra20048 it's true religion just divides and divides people , they kill eachother for no reason

[@honeychillibean]

@DELTA DEFENCE people like you are immature and try to invalidate atheists everytime. Just coz you did it to be cool doesn't mean everyone is like you .

[@masterquiz143]

It's so evident that Atheists fear all Religions after the Abrahamic Cults they come to know during their lifetime ... If you experience the Dharmic traditions , you will feel different . I assure you . It will not affect the Dharmic religions , but it will surely affect you . Learn Eightfold path of Lord Buddha , you will experience Bliss . Learn Jainism , path of Mahaveer and you will be conscious about Nonviolence . Learn Hinduism , path of Bhakti , and many types of Yogas , (Not the physical yogas) ,BhaktiYoga , DnyanYoga , KarmaYoga , you will know how Sanatana Dharma is all about experiencing this body to its fullest .

[@masterquiz143]

@Biplab Singh You can have your say ... But Without cultural things , LIFE IS BORING AS YOU ... 👍

[@C204-e1x]

@@masterquiz143 one can have a cultural identity despite not having a regilious one. You're implicitly trying to say that following dharmic religions makes us Indian.

[@Pantheist2602]

@@C204-e1x what is culture mahnnn .. does it have any scientific background really ? 😤🥱🤭

[@antiabrahamicreligion]

They can give a good knowledge about mind and cosmos However there are faults among them too..

[@iu9130]

I just want to say that you are doing a great job. Your videos kind of turned me from an extremist to somewhat agnostic

[@scienceisdope]

No... You should remain an agnostic atheist. Not a plain agnostic, not an extremist atheist.

[@galibjamadar129]

@@scienceisdope Hey Man great video 🔥 following your channel for a long time. I had some questions though. I'm an agnostic with some bias towards the belief in theism. You very well explained the scientific method and Karl Poppers theory of falsifiability. There are some serious issues which you didn't discuss specially epistemology and specifically Philosophy of Science, like the two views in science 1) Scientific Realism 2) Scientific Instrumentalism - which proposes that science is useful and instrumental for understanding reality but doesn't give 100% accurate representation of reality. There are some presuppositions in science that can't be proven like 1) Science presumes naturalism. 2) The Scientific Method can't prove itself to be objectively true (here's why we need philosophy). 3) Reliability of the human mind (you basically have to believe and can't be proven from first principles)/ Evolutionary Reliabilism and limits of human senses to conclude empirical evidence as the only form of information to be true. If we assume that life started from non-concious chemical matter after reacting with each other. We literally can't prove how can non-concious matter give rise to concious living beings. In a perfectly naturalistic worldview it's impossible for anyone to prove that the human mind can truly understand and observe nature as it is not 100% reliable to comprehend reality, i.e. proving Evolutionary Reliabilism to be true from first principles is next to impossible. Science is great for building models that work, innovation and technology, advances in medicine, etc. When it comes to the topic of God its better to argue philosophically rather than scientifically (limited to proving unscientific claims in religious scriptures). I was a huge fan of Richard Dawkins but philosophy made me understand where he was wrong and where Atheist philosophers like Daniel Dennete were correct. What gives me a bias of there being a creator is the Argument of Existence of A Nessecary Being who is eternal because if the universe had a beginning the universe can't really be eternal. Multiverse is another but a pseudoscientific theory which lacks evidence. Believing in Multiverse is simply an alternative to Believing in a Single Creator who is eternal. Thank you looking forward towards your next videos✌️.

[@Rahul-Jain]

@@scienceisdope Shout out to your efforts, but in criticism I want to say you lack perception, you have blocked your mind of any question which do not fall under scientific parlance and which don't come under evaluation of scientific method. theist and atheist both are same. philosophically i would say being skeptic is good and its even a natural human tendency but after some time it will make you tired because it will not lead you to all answers. science is just limited to physical aspect of universe. why someone wants to limit their thinking and prison themselves in smallness of logic and to scientific methods. yes science has achieved many things but science knows nothing about origin or end of anything but explaining something which is in between, it is just revolving around circumference and not touching its core. science just consider physical aspect of life but what about emotional, consciousness and beingness of life itself, what about most fundamental questions of life like who am I or meaning of life. it is unable to answers them because its lacks clarity and perception beyond physical. if you believe in science it would become a religion, if you limit yourself to just to some theories of science you are doing a crime towards human potential of brain. have scientific acumen but not like this otherwise being scientific would just be a ideocracy towards one's own self.

[@iaminevitable5696]

@@scienceisdope you are not atheist??

[@yourajtiwary3472]

I am not an atheist anymore Lord Richard Dawkins is my god of information and rationality

[@theagnosticdeist3373]

lol

[@rahulgoswami3691]

He is really cool. Though I like Hitchens more.

[@BatmanArkham8592]

Dawkins or any New atheists are bad source(Not Always) for Rationality in this God topic I recommend atheists like Graham Oppy, Paul Draper, Bertrand Russell, Jordan Howard Sobel, David Hume, Sean Carroll,Alex malpass, Real Atheology, Wes Morriston, erik wielenberg so on

[@yourajtiwary3472]

@@BatmanArkham8592 the fact that you think Dawkins is new is just stupid

[@parthasarathyparandaman3704]

And you know what is awesome unlike most Godmen, Dawkins wouldn't approve of it. He'd rather be reasoned with and argued against than be believed blindly.

[@ChrisDsouza2003]

This is such a good video. It explains what makes something scientific or unscientific with such simplicity, so that anyone can follow it.

[@scienceisdope]

Thank you! I'm glad you liked it :)

[@ChrisDsouza2003]

@@scienceisdope And I am glad you exist, lol.

[@muhibkidwai9623]

Can't wait for this video.. You're doing awesome work man!

[@scienceisdope]

Thank you!

[@enlightenmenttruth]

@@scienceisdopeExpose bhageshwar dham sarkar....

[@roshantopno1253]

Disclaimer: I am an atheist myself. This concept of unfalsibiality is really a good way to keep actual science from pseudo science but I think now science has developed so much that if we falsify one theory we may need to change many things across different domains. Since everything is interconnected. Let's take an example of law of gravitation which you showed. Now it is accepted that gravity is not a force but an illusion due to curvature of space time.we still use newtonian gravitational theory many times while talking about gravity but it is now falsified by general relativity. I think we might need to rephrase our definition of scientific🤔 but what even I am not sure.

[@sai_69]

Newtonian theory of gravitation, though technically incorrect is pretty darn accurate in terms of numbers for the most part. This combined with the fact that it is already what an average person without much knowledge of physics, finds difficult to understand, relativity isn't something that you can explain to the masses, justifies using the Newtonian theory.

[@scienceisdope]

Newton's laws are falsified laws for sure. But it's still perfectly applicable for all earthbound mechanics and very barely differs from the results from relativity. So of course we would teach it in schools because it's much simpler than relativity. But no scientist actually pursues Newton's models today. Because we have better models

[@roshantopno1253]

A heart from science is dope 😁

[@roshantopno1253]

Yes I agree with that newton gravitational theory is still a very good approximation

[@jackyjack9660]

You even use newtonian mechanics in engineering...

[@baivabsarkar3477]

Even if you see Eastern religion is not about God Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism has nothing to do with God but with ending of suffering and attaining Moksha Now you will ask what about so many Gods in Hinduism? Actually they are not Gods, Devtas and Rishis are our ancestors who attained liberation and supernatural powers , they help us by opening many doorways You need not believe in what I am saying, but pick one Sadhana of any deity, you can experience them And even Brahman or Nirvana is a state of void So there is no God in Eastern religion Different schools of Yoga do not promise anything about God, they simply talk about experiences different states of consciousness I would suggest you to practice any one of them , it requires no belief system

[@NN94887]

A scientist can be theist , atheist , agnostic etc based on his personal experience and choice ,but I think , science is agnostic . And also , what are your views on buddha , his teachings , philosophy of buddhisam and relationship between buddhisam and india's only golden period during buddhisam before falling down.??.

[@sai_69]

true

[@nyeebie]

Science and laws should remain secular. From a Christian.

[@booksanimeenthusiast]

You are asking his views on Buddhism. As if he is practicing Buddhist?

[@SomethingaboutScreens]

Someone - Religions hide questions. Me - Proof? Proof - TRUST ME BRO!

[@applepie6513]

god of the gaps fallacy is literally named god of the gaps because it hides questions. that's how religion hides questions. We earlier believed that eclipses occurred through ram and setu it was hiding and not understanding the question and a flawed judgement.

[@pranay561]

I just love the flowcharts and those random video of pranav in between doing experiments 😂😂😂

[@raghvendrasinghsengar8360]

A question! What if? We falsify a unfalsifiable statement with an another unfalsifiable statement? This will create a huge paradox! Just think for a moment! Listen to an imaginary agreement here A: The God Exist B: Why? A: Because, They made all of us B: How do you know? A: Because, someone made us for sure B: But who? And why? A: God brought the world into existence and as the capstone of this good work, he created people in his image so that they could share in his overflowing love, grace and goodness through their relationships with the Trinity. B: Whatever, I can't argue more... Here , "A" Gave numerous of Unfalsifiable Statements to Support his first Unfalsiable statement! And he can do that continuously! Where as "B" Asked for the evidence, which he didn't received any. This reminds me of a kid telling his friend story of a imaginary ghost incident! One lie after another. My question is, how can we brake this ULTRA MEGA SUPER DUPER TREMENDOUSLY STRONG FALLACY?

[@justasapien2620]

That's what every relegious people does this I think first they need to understand how science works

[@kanakkaradbhajne887]

@@justasapien2620 science is man made.

[@TarunKanthK]

@@kanakkaradbhajne887 Science is the observation of the rules of nature. Not man made. It's just how the universe functions.

[@TarunKanthK]

@Raghvendra Singh Sengar May be the only way is to present facts while debating. Another point is we cannot debate with a person who believes in fairy tales without asking a question and asks doubt when it comes to scientific facts. "Those who believe without a reason cannot be convinced by a reason."

[@kanakkaradbhajne887]

@@TarunKanthK Understanding Universe is beyond science.

[@hajimeisayama9842]

For me...both theist snd atheist are believe but agnosticm is fact..

[@Learner5555]

agnostics are basically clueless and they are aware of it n admit it.

[@Akira-dm3tj]

I'm an agnostic too but I disagree cuz agnosticism simply means "we don't know" Being ignorant or confused about something is not a fact it's rather an attitude towards that thing.

[@hajimeisayama9842]

@@Akira-dm3tj you do realise we are trying to find a definitive answer to the question of existence of creator...i mean just think how big and importance of this question...so answering it with your gut feeling that 'i believe' or 'i do not believe' in existence of god is pointless....i'm waiting for this qestion to be answered by science...as of now...our science is not that advance enough...and according to our current understanding of science....it neither claims or denies the existence of god cause it is not advance enough to answer this question yet...so the question is still unanswered...so i'm waiting for the day when science brings us a defintive answer....till then...the most logical thing is being clueless rather believing in something not proved yet....it is similar to question of existence of aliens....some believe they do exist and some don't...but scientists say that we don't know yet....that's exactly my point of view towards both god and aliens or any other question that is not answered by science yet..

[@hey0173]

atheism means the disbelief in god it is not a belief that god doesn’t exist

[@justasapien2620]

@@hajimeisayama9842 this is ridiculous, if science was asked a question what happen before big bang it says it doesn't know!! That's a valid answer, you, me and every life are made up of atoms which produces consciousness, intelligence, the atoms produce because some of the fundamental of the universe contants the numbers are not accuarate (G, SPEED OF LIGHT ETC) from the time of the big bang till now we clearly observe the stars, black holes, quasers, planets, solar system doesnt have any particular purpose ,if our solar system die in this galaxy there is no special in that, with repeated stimulatary, observation we conclude that, similar does with evolution of life no particular animal is chosen to solve a particular problem, out evoltionary brain made understand this way since its easy to grasp, if natural selection force to do a carnivore to eat plant based good it has to do for its survival,( natural selection doesnt care about the pain and suffering of the organism )by the way natural selection is not deterministic, (only aplicable in forest based life not to humans living in present) it has no brain, to think, from this conclusion the god is not ominipotent, diestic , he is so good etc. He is not worth to prat doing rituals etc. Nobody can certainly say god existed or not but the evidence. Clearly shows he never existed, and it is growing stronger

[@sankalanjain8597]

How about this. Suppose your general statement is all leaves are green. And this has been accepted by the world. But somehow someone was able to find a brown leaf and now that brown leaf is gone. How does that someone convince the world of the wrong that is there in the general statement ?

[@sankalanjain8597]

Basically the evidence was short-lived. How do u resolve something like this ?

[@sankalanjain8597]

Also i am a physics student so not trying to embarrass you. Just a question 😁

[@sankalanjain8597]

Love u btw

[@alexicon2006]

So in this case I'd personally say that the evidence of the original statement being false would not be considered valid, considering a very small group of people or just one person had actually observed that evidence. In the eyes of the rest of the world they have no reason to believe the guy,even if he's telling the truth. The truth will only be accepted when the observation of the evidence would be broadcasted to the authorities of the world, and that's how it should be in my opinion since that prevents any form of false truth being believed in the field of science. The only downside to this method is that the development would be slower, but if it makes the facts obtained accurate then it's a right decision. Edit:- Also wanted to say that was a really good question. Well done! It's so cool that you're a physics student. I myself am in high school rn.

[@sankalanjain8597]

@@alexicon2006 yeah my profs also said something similar. Thanks dude

[@kashishagrawal3793]

I am a Physics teacher. And an atheist. And I tell my students that if I was the first one on an island with 100 ppl who are just brought out of nowhere with a clean slate, I would first introduce religion. Bcoz it is something that holds a community/society together, makes them accountable and moral. If there was no religion, ppl would never have fear of the end result (heaven and hell) and would go on to do wrong in their life, with little or no repercussions. Btw, amazing work, job well done.

[@kagurogintsuki1620]

Why won't you introduce the concept of stability of a society? Explain them the importance of society and then explain that doing bad brings instability. If you introduce religion, bullshit will start again.

[@gentlesavage3808]

People work in hierarchy, you always need an authoritative figure to make people conscious of their actions and their consequences. God is that imaginary authority which everyone submits to regardless of his or her position in society. But the problem is people begin to justify their mindless and stupid actions as God's will. God limits an individual's growth. That's why you see an extremely religious person is a threat to society. For him, his imaginary God's will is above the truth. That's why 9/11 and many other unfortunate incidents occur because of religion. I would go as far as to say that, "RELIGION IS THE CANCER OF SOCIETY".

[@sumeetghai8867]

Religion is a mind manipulation technique . A little subtle though where you are made to beleive that an imaginary cctv is eyeing on you and will punish you once you die instead pf stopping you mischief right there and then🤣🤣🤣

[@sumeetghai8867]

@DELTA DEFENCE nothing it just that being is stupid enough to act as a watchdog but doing absolutely nothing.

[@bruhmoment1271]

This was a good content... Pranav, just a small suggestion: This video covered the topics very well, but it is only good for pseudoscience enthusiasts... I mean, people who think they are rational...cuz there is a very important point you missing in your all videos, I might tell you in somewhere else, not here in comment section ...but that's very important. Have a great day, keep making such videos, it was very helpful :)

[@shrirangsavale571]

what is the point exactly??? I guess he is trying to convey the idea to target a more general audience. He is saying that pranav should focus to target normal believers, rather his target audience is rational thinkers. And that's a very good approach. Presenting the idea in such a way, making the viewer to rethink on his beliefs and what myths they developed. Making people question their ideas and then making them realize that they were wrong. Pranav does most of it but some improvement will help him to get better.

[@shrirangsavale571]

@Neeraj ya I have experience the same thing when I tried to debate with my friends on this topic. They ignore any logic and state that god is beyond logic and senses. But i feel this mindset is a problem. Let me explain e.g If a child is born in religious environment. When he gets 3 he starts asking questions about existence and how things work. He asks for sun formed his family replies god made it. He asks more question but answer stays the same god. Then he suddenly gains infinite knowledge as answer to every question is God . He is no more curious as he already knows the answer. And he loses the scientific temperament. If this happens with enough large population he lose a large amount of great thinkers, scientists etc. I think this is a major problem and we should create a counter to it.

[@galibjamadar129]

Hey Man great video 🔥 following your channel for a long time. I had some questions though. I'm an agnostic with some bias towards the belief in theism. You very well explained the scientific method and Karl Poppers theory of falsifiability. There are some serious issues which you didn't discuss specially epistemology and specifically Philosophy of Science, like the two views in science 1) Scientific Realism 2) Scientific Instrumentalism - which proposes that science is useful and instrumental for understanding reality but doesn't give 100% accurate representation of reality. There are some presuppositions in science that can't be proven like 1) Science presumes naturalism. 2) The Scientific Method can't prove itself to be objectively true (here's why we need philosophy). 3) Reliability of the human mind (you basically have to believe and can't be proven from first principles)/ Evolutionary Reliabilism and limits of human senses to conclude empirical evidence as the only form of information to be true. If we assume that life started from non-concious chemical matter after reacting with each other. We literally can't prove how can non-concious matter give rise to concious living beings. In a perfectly naturalistic worldview it's impossible for anyone to prove that the human mind can truly understand and observe nature as it is not 100% reliable to comprehend reality, i.e. proving Evolutionary Reliabilism to be true from first principles is next to impossible. Science is great for building models that work, innovation and technology, advances in medicine, etc. When it comes to the topic of God its better to argue philosophically rather than scientifically (limited to proving unscientific claims in religious scriptures). I was a huge fan of Richard Dawkins but philosophy made me understand where he was wrong and where Atheist philosophers like Daniel Dennete were correct. What gives me a bias of there being a creator is the Argument of Existence of A Nessecary Being who is eternal because if the universe had a beginning the universe can't really be eternal. Multiverse is another but a pseudoscientific theory which lacks evidence. Believing in Multiverse is simply an alternative to Believing in a Single Creator who is eternal. Thank you looking forward towards your next videos✌️.

[@galibjamadar129]

@Darshana Ambulkar all the refutations have their own issues and they too have been refuted. Science from an epistemological level and an empirical level can't even prove Evolutionary Reliabilism. As for refuting the argument of a necessary being you will always fall either into the fallacy of infinite regress or into the belief that the universe is eternal, as for the later we have enough evidence that the universe had a beginning and is not eternal. The more you go deep into philosophy and the more you will realise why the argument for an eternal necessary being makes so much sense. Hence my bias towards it but still am an agnostic.

[@Ryan-ii8xo]

@Darshana Ambulkar Sure, caricatures of Aquinas' arguments have been utterly demolished. State your counter argument against the argument from motion and please do not start with the pseudo-premise everything that has a beginning is set in motion. Also, don't ask who caused God(It is meaningless to assert that something actualize pure actuality)?

[@Ryan-ii8xo]

@@galibjamadar129 No, we don't know that the universe has a beginning. GR breaks down when you approach the primeval atom. The universe could still be eternal. We don't know. That is a common misconception about the big bang.

[@shajjadhossainshohag1491]

Science is still growing. There are more information adding to science that were mentioned in most of the religion...

[@vijaysolanki6593]

Srinivasa Ramanujan ❤ And NDT is actually agnostic.

[@scienceisdope]

He's a proper atheist. I've heard him say

[@vijaysolanki6593]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/eau2fnZrp7yppdU

[@vijaysolanki6593]

@@scienceisdope You can search on KZbin related to this. You will definitely find couple of videos on him being Atheist or not.

[@vijaysolanki6593]

@@scienceisdopekzbin.info/www/bejne/f2PMpZ-LoalkZq8

[@scienceisdope]

@@vijaysolanki6593 I welcome you to do the same :)

[@sarthakkmishraa]

A true scientist seeks. He/she doesn't believe or disbelieve.And he/she doesn't make conclusions about the things he/she doesn't know.

[@amitkolhe4155]

Awesome video Pranav. Keep up the good work!

[@vikramkalabi3603]

This I feel is your best work so far. Delightful content.

[@carljohnsongroovestreetgang]

Counter example for simulation - We must be able to see the glitches in the simulations too

[@simplefahrenheit4318]

My answer to that would simply be that there is enough evidence for God not being there but 0 evidence for God being there.

[@asresalim6145]

Lol, the entire world is the proof of existence of someone who created it. Or do you believe that things can come out on their own? Give me evidence such thing can happen.

[@noelrodrigues8179]

@@asresalim6145 evaporation happens on its own,but ancient people thought rain was a blessing from God

[@niharranjangoswami6307]

@@asresalim6145 same thing applies to creationism. So the universe can't come out of nothing, but God can for absolutely no explicable reason. And then comes the circular reasoning. "oh god is eternal and ever existing" how do you know that? "beacuse my book said so" and why do you believe the book? "because it's god's word"

[@simplefahrenheit4318]

@@asresalim6145 my definition of 'God' is a manager not a creator which doesn't exist, even if someone created it what's the point in praying to them?

[@asresalim6145]

@@niharranjangoswami6307 Well Look at the hypocritcal reasoning here. "Well Universe came out of nowhere" "How do you know?" "Because a few people say so and few books say so" LOL

[@informationbytes]

Irrational numbers contradicts the simulation world theory as they contains infinite and non repeating digits. So it is impossible for an external being to produce such unending sequences which are mathematically correct.

[@nithinrajieasow847]

It s nice to have an athiest using this plaatform to preach atheism, like other religion. JK pranav bhai you are doing great, i have seen a lot of religious groups preaching nothing but hate but only atheist are like cool dude. I think india needs an authentic atheist voice which can counter bullshit propogated by so called mainstream religions. From a christian.

[@JonSnow-pi6jb]

He literally said in the starting of this that "HE IS NOT PREACHING ATHEISM". What the heck are you watching ?

[@nithinrajieasow847]

@@JonSnow-pi6jb bro I said JK.(just kidding) as in sarcastic way I meant.

[@nithinrajieasow847]

@@JonSnow-pi6jb plus I am not that great with my grammar so should have wrote just kidding in its entirety.😅

[@Dense197]

@@nithinrajieasow847 bro ,you are Christian and you want every hindu to be atheist ,just to save your religion .if you want atheism in mainstream ,then be atheist. If you become christian or muslim ,then I'll be proud hindu. First leave your religion

[@theagnosticdeist3373]

@@nithinrajieasow847 the irony is that you're a "Christian"

[@rupankarsen112]

This really shocks me that even after having a close relation with science and having an understanding of how everything works , how can anyone believe in God no matter how religious one's background was..... No matter what they have achieved in their lives, if you propagate lies as a "scientist" then you are not eligible to be called one.

[@What_ever-Dude]

The fact that The One Above All from Marvel comics made the list of gods😭

[@Ishangelforyou]

In these Modern days religious superstitions got disappeared but what stay here is the faith the positiveness of God As of now we have many problems like boys got p*rn addicted in very low age i was also movies now days motivate to do crimes R*pe and smocking drinking students disrespecting their teachers as a thug life but in our religion we consider teachers and parents like a god and respect them we didn't even sit on their chairs my religion taught me to do good works so that you will be offered heaven after death and respect every human as everyone has bishnu in their soul Atlast i am just sharing my experience that I was a Saraswati shishu Vidya mandir student and this is a Hindu religion school and now I am noticing that my behaviour thaughts are far better than my snooker convent school friends So better is that you should focus on those problems which I have mentioned above instead of destroying a well organised religions 🙏 By- shrikant rout neet selected candidate

[@satya7198]

Pranav, check out Abhijit Chavda. He peddles revisionist history and claims that he it's based in science.

[@rohan34]

Religion should not be community based or inherited through family ties ... It should simply be a philosophical discussion, that's it. It should not be a way of life and it should not be considered the path to truth. Science is there to do that.

[@edokan]

Meanwhile Newton, “He who thinks half-heartedly will not believe in God; but he who really thinks has to believe in God.”

[@aquatick1848]

Bruh 400 yrs ago we did not have enough understanding on the natural world, hence to render some possibility of God. Back then pretty much everyone was a theist by default. The church controlled so much of the social and political power you HAD to fall in line. To illustrate the same, one can reasonably say with some confidence newton believed in creationism, like almost everyone back then. But today we know better. Evolution by natural selection explains and examines biology precisely. Newton btw definitely believed in alchemy, which is proven to be bullshit

[@BatmanArkham8592]

Majority of scientists in human history was Theists Only recently the number of atheists increased in scientific community

[@sandeep8724]

Bro I was also atheist but concept of monism make sense

[@shashwatpandey7939]

@@sandeep8724 have u read the Upnishads? Just search about it on KZbin I bet u wont regret and will find it rational.

[@sandeep8724]

@@shashwatpandey7939 yeah I know about it iam hindu

[@raghvendratripathi1920]

Neil deGrasse Tyson has on record said that he is neither a theist nor an atheist but considers himself as an agnostic.

[@Rohanokokkk]

Which of course means that he is unsure of the presence of a higher being or God if u want to call it that way.

[@vishwakumar2864]

Many popular atheist activists define "Atheism" as "not believing in god's existence" . So it includes both : 1) Agnostic atheists (who dont believe because they dont know due to the lack of belief) 2) Gnostic atheists (who believe in god's non-existence) Universities of philosophy like Stanford includes this definition as "psychological state" . Words get their meaning by their popularity . I really dont care even if tomorrow if Neil D Tyson surprisingly starts believing in god and becomes a theist, but atleast for now , by the above definition he can be called as agnostic atheist. Even then if he doesnt wanna be identified as an atheist. Fine ! Let it be . Who cares .

[@sai_69]

@Varun All agnostic atheists are by default agnostic about a deist god. A non deistic god would've revealed himself in some material form.

[@theagnosticdeist3373]

@@sai_69 Agnostic atheism is basically that you don't know if a god exists because of lack of positive evidence so you live your life as an Atheist

[@akhiljames3435]

Material forms don't need the concept of supernatural or God to be explained. A deistic God comes into picture because of the necessity to explain why is there something rather than nothing . Read the mathematician Leibniz on this. He was a brilliant philospher who believed in a deistic God, someone who is outside of material realm i.e. space, time and energy.

[@cottoncandy6683]

There's a difference between being religious and being a theist. To be a theist a simple "I believe there is something bigger than me out there which I cannot explain" is sufficient. These aren't beliefs. They just believe in "something more". Many scientists thought this way. Einstein included. The Upanishads also follow this same principle. If you think about it, all theists were once atheists.

[@cottoncandy6683]

@Varun Einstein believed in a God that was all-encompassing. He definitely said all religions are stupid. But check the number of resources that state that he believed in something more that was responsible for the grand order in the universe. He believed in a God, a higher possibility but could not put into words what it was. He always said there was something more.

[@cottoncandy6683]

@@duckduckbro I did not say Upanishads have a definition for theist and atheist. I only said that the meaning or principles shared are similar.

[@ashbakchod]

The major flaw in science is that it can only be used in " How to Do something". But it can't tell us " How to Think / Choose something". It is done by philosophy. And all religion more or less better or worse cersions of philosophy... It doesn't matter if God exists or not, but religion helps to take most moral decision. I am an Agnostic btw. So in my opinion we should follow science in every practical aspect but when it comes to moral perspective we can take help of religious texts of philosophy....

[@DevanshBharti]

When I saw Zakir Naik on thumbnai, I knew I had to skip this bullsh*t.

[@krrrrrrr22]

Bro the last section of your video reminded me of "sapiens" by yuval noah harari! He also gave a nice explanation of the emergence of this idea of god. BTW, as always amazing video from your end i have shared it to my theist friends and relatives but am sure they'll skip it just after a min or so :))

[@stutihem5358]

Fav book 💘

[@ankushds7018]

On the Elon Musk's claim, I just have to say... It's not even based on an observation. It's based purely on probability. When something can't be observed, it's already outside the realm of science. Which is why we needn't take it seriously.

[@shreyasr5629]

How is it based on probability?

[@ankushds7018]

@@shreyasr5629 well the argument goes something like this: If intelligent lives are capable of making simulated worlds that seem real with 100% accuracy, then it's possible that they've made hundreds. And hundreds of those simulations have made their own virtual simulation. Thereby making it 1:1 million ratio of real:simulated worlds. Therefore, there's a one in a million chance that we're in a simulation. It's probability.

[@rravitejamavr6650]

@@shreyasr5629 Read on Nick Bostrom's simulation argument.

[@cauliflowerhead2735]

Gravity can't be observed but it can be quantified and "observed" through equations.

[@ankushds7018]

@@cauliflowerhead2735 I wasn't using the observed in the colloquial sense. Perhaps I should've said "able to detect" or "whose presence can be inferred"

[@kwondo_22_mars]

I'm very glad to have this channel, because when i try to explain people something who are fed up with the things and gone crazy about unscientific stuffs. They usually like to call me a mad 🤦 even i don't care about that, i tried to do good for their emotions about worrying for illogical things 🤦.

[@utkarshparashar7994]

Damn! That flying speggati monster.

[@Littlethingsk]

Thank you , Pranav ji. Please keep doing this great work. It is very much needed. :)