THIS NEEDS TO BE STOPPED!! EXPLAINING WRONG CONCEPTS ❌❌

Рет қаралды 11,727

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 215

@Mr_MaqviN 5 ай бұрын

❌ No ones know everything also you, if you want Exaplaination read this - 👉 In the context of physics and electrical engineering, current is typically treated as a scalar quantity because it is described by its magnitude (the amount of charge flowing per unit time) without considering direction. However, in certain advanced theoretical or specialized contexts, such as in plasma physics or in situations involving anisotropic conductors or specific mathematical treatments, current can be described as a vector quantity. For example, in plasma physics or in materials with directional conductivity (like some crystals), current density can vary in direction and magnitude, requiring vector notation to fully describe its behavior. In such cases, current is represented by both magnitude (scalar) and direction (vector). So, while current is generally considered a scalar in everyday electrical applications, there are specialized contexts where it can be treated as a vector depending on the specific properties of the medium through which it flows.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks 😊 best of luck for ur future 😁

@carryMinaat 4 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq I support you .. NMS sir is highly knowledgeable and can be considered among top teachers ,,,,, but that doesn't mean he is 100% always correct .. he can also be wrong ,, but 99% he is right and rest of the teachers are not even closer to him ... and this is correct no one should have ego neither ' you " and nor ' Sir ' real King aur knowledgeable😎 man will easily accept his mistake 😊☺️😏😏 👍🏻👍🏻

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq bhai light v jrurat k anusar particle aur wave nature dikhata hai toh pehle tu v ye baat sikh le fir gyan peliyo SCIENCE IS WAY OF MAKING THINGS CONVINIENT NO ANY FRAME IS PERFECT . BY THE WAY BURI LGI HO TOH SORRY

@backupmaster-v3i 4 ай бұрын

current density is always a vector with direction and magnitude in all contexts.

@prajjawal4148 4 ай бұрын

@@priyanshuiit3235light is both...particle as well as wave

@prajjawal4148 4 ай бұрын

1:36 bro all physical quantities are tensor of different order. I think what he said was correct because it appears more logical. Then tell me if area is scalar, why is elemental area vector? 2:07 its like area is scalar but dA is vector😂😂...and what is current element??...its just another way to define vector current...( I think ). 2:53 he didnt said that current in current density is vector...he said that current density as well doesnt follow law of vector addition... My final question is that plz explain me if u r correct then why is current scalar even when all its characteristics are similar to current density...( Both dont follow law of vector addition.)

@motherisape 5 ай бұрын

I can say current is trivector . I can say current is tensor it all depends on use . Math is invented according to use i can make my own math and use current as vector to solve real problem

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

U can use your math to solve problems but in laws and theorems everything is defined for a reason

@motherisape 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq everything is defined for convenience of use . I think it is best to define current as trivector it solves lot's of different problems if you think it as trivector .

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

bhai light v jrurat k anusar particle aur wave nature dikhata hai toh pehle tu v ye baat sikh le fir gyan peliyo SCIENCE IS WAY OF MAKING THINGS CONVINIENT NO ANY FRAME IS PERFECT . BY THE WAY BURI LGI HO TOH SORRY

@motherisape 4 ай бұрын

@@priyanshuiit3235 vector is mathematical object that is used to describe things. While wave and particles are physical thing

@hemantkumarsingh8615 4 ай бұрын

In advanced physics, electric current is considered a vector quantity. Here's how it is understood within the context of tensors and advanced physics: ### 1. **Basic Definition:** - **Electric Current (I)** is defined as the rate of flow of electric charge through a conductor or any medium. Mathematically, it is given by: \[ I = \frac{dQ}{dt} \] where \( Q \) is the electric charge and \( t \) is time. ### 2. **Current as a Scalar or Vector:** - In simple circuits or when discussing the magnitude of current, it is often treated as a scalar quantity, which represents the amount of charge passing per unit time. - However, in the context of electromagnetism and more advanced physics, current is treated as a **vector** quantity. This is because current has both magnitude and direction, especially in the study of current flow in three-dimensional space. ### 3. **Current Density (J):** - **Current Density (\(\mathbf{J}\))** is a vector quantity that represents the electric current per unit area of cross-section. It provides a more precise description of the distribution of current in a conductor. \[ \mathbf{J} = \frac{d\mathbf{I}}{dA} \] where \( d\mathbf{I} \) is the current through a differential area element \( dA \). The vector nature of \(\mathbf{J}\) reflects both the magnitude of current density and the direction of current flow. ### 4. **Current as a Tensor:** - In even more advanced frameworks, such as in the theory of electromagnetism using special relativity, current can be represented using a **4-vector** or **rank-2 tensor** in four-dimensional spacetime. - **Four-current (\(J^\mu\))**: In relativistic electromagnetism, the electric current is part of a 4-vector: \[ J^\mu = \left(c ho, \mathbf{J} ight) \] where \( ho \) is the charge density, \( \mathbf{J} \) is the current density, and \( c \) is the speed of light. This is a 4-vector in the context of special relativity, combining charge density and current density into a single entity that transforms appropriately under Lorentz transformations. ### 5. **Summary:** - **In classical physics:** Current is often treated as a scalar when considering simple circuit analysis. - **In electromagnetism:** Current is treated as a vector quantity (e.g., current density \(\mathbf{J}\)). - **In advanced physics and relativity:** Current can be part of a 4-vector or a tensor, integrating the concept of current with charge density in spacetime. So, while electric current is most commonly a vector quantity, its representation can become more complex in advanced physical theories, where it may be part of a tensor or a 4-vector.

@SherMohammad-ll5ev 6 ай бұрын

Jarurat ke hisab se hi mante hai nahi to A and dL bhi to scaler hai phir inhen kyon vector mana maje ke liye

@selimakhtar4909 6 ай бұрын

actually bro magnetic field ke calcultaion pain haam jo dl lete hain usmain dl ka direction according to the direction of current lete hain... and current density main bhi area vector ka direction current flow ke according hi lete hain ... to saari chison ka direction current ke direction se influenced hai.. and sir ka point bhi iye hi tha ki keunki hamne current ko pehle se ek scaler quantity bana ke rakha hai to jab hame vector ki jarurat padi tab scientist ne us jarurat ko mitane ke liye dorse vector quantities ka use kara ...

@PrinceSingh-ul8fd 5 ай бұрын

@@selimakhtar4909😅

@selimakhtar4909 6 ай бұрын

paar bhaiya i have question ki magnetic field ke calcultaion pain haam jo dl lete hain usmain dl ka direction according to the direction of current lete hain... and current density main bhi area vector ka direction current flow ke according hi lete hain ... to saari chison ka direction current ke direction se influenced hai.. and sir ka point bhi iye hi tha ki keunki hamne current ko pehle se ek scaler quantity bana ke rakha hai to jab hame vector ki jarurat padi tab scientist ne us jarurat ko mitane ke liye dorse vector quantities ka use kara ...

@prashantthakur113 6 ай бұрын

real

@meenalmishra1804 5 ай бұрын

Cheeso ka DIRECTION CURRENT SE INFLYENCED H, dosent mean current vector h, wo sirf influence karega😊,

@prashantthakur113 5 ай бұрын

@@meenalmishra1804 say it complete..."chizo ka direction current ke DIRECTION se influenced h"..it means current is considered as a vector in that particular scenario since we use its DIRECTION to influence "chizo ka direction" as you said... Isn't it??

@SouravKumar-st8ve 5 ай бұрын

Bro tu pahle thik se physics phad le fir Gyan dena

@selimakhtar4909 5 ай бұрын

@@SouravKumar-st8ve agar kuch galat bola hai to bata

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

Zarurat ke hisaab se hi koi cheez vector ya scalar defined hoti h. Vector is a tool in mathematics, its created to explain 3D motion. So in such mathematics u define certain things. U dont look for wajah or cause.

@aarnav3574 6 ай бұрын

1:24 bhaiya what about light we assume light to be wave in wave optics and we assume it to be like a ray while explaining reflection and refraction ( ray optics) we define lights arrcoding to pur convention?

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

Bro u are right but we consider light as particle because reflection is possible only because of particle nature and interference diffraction is only possible because of wave nature

@ThakurVanshPratap-w6v 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishqTo Bhai yaha bhi to jab interference ko explain karne ki jarurat padi to uska nature wave nature mana gaya lekin jab reflection ko explain karna pada to uska nature particle nature mana gaya To ky tujhe nahi lagta ki yaha bhi ham situation ke according hi light ka nature treat kar rahe hai Aur dushri baat aapne bola ki reflection is possible only because of the particle nature of light Lekin ham use wave nature se bhi to samajh sakte hai and explain bhi kar sakte hai Bhai NMS sir ko Gyan Dene ki kosis mat kar aapke jais hazaro bacho ko wo ab tak padha chuke hai Aur sorry agar koi baat galat lagi ho Thanks

@brainxone 5 ай бұрын

First study wave optics from good book/teacher not from KZbin teachers then you will be able to understand the difference between wave nature and particle nature aese kisi bhi cheese se compare nahi krte😂😂😂

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@SohamVerma-l9s 5 ай бұрын

Bhai jitne tu saal ka nahi hai na usse zyada to unko padhate hue ho gye honge. 😂😂😂. Pehle khud kota k bade bade gyani teachers se padho phir seekhao aur humble raho nahi to yt par tik nahi paoge. Aapka concept bhale hi sahi ho par duniya maximum time usi k sath hai jo zyada famous hai

@ahmadhamzah9553 6 ай бұрын

NMS is actually right

@meenalmishra1804 5 ай бұрын

He fr explained, dont follow smone blindly

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

@@meenalmishra1804I have only corrected the concept they are thinking I am disrespecting NMS sir

@Code8564 5 ай бұрын

Sir ko beijjati krne ke baad phir bolte ho mene beijjati kaha ki sir ki, waah@@physics-e-ishq

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Mention at least one time where I disrespect Nmssir @@Code8564

@Code8564 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq Beta Thumbnail se pata chal jata he ki logo pr kis tarah effect karegi nms sir ke bare me. Zyada acting mat kr.

@v1kash955 6 ай бұрын

Jaroorat ke hisab se karte h... e- duality "12th ke syllabus ka istemal kare"... Okay as you say

@prabhakartiwari8771 5 ай бұрын

In case of alteenating current, phasor sum of currents is used, where current is treated as vector.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

In AC calculation we add two currents as a vector but in AC it is not a vector it is a sinusoidal quantity which has some phase and frequency and if we add two different sinusoids with same frequency and different phases then we are actually adding their instantaneous values and it follows phasor concepts not the vector concepts. You can say that two sinusoids of same frequency but different phases can be added with the help of phasors and it is similar to vector addition. We are actually adding two sinusoids of same frequency to get a new sinusoid.

@prabhakartiwari8771 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq you are your self saying as in a calculation we add two currents as a vector. It is what I have already discussed. Actually phasor quantity is rotating vector used for sinusoidal quantities

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

I have written it is a sinsunodual quantity

@prabhakartiwari8771 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq alternating quantities are expressed with the sinusoidal form.

@ShivaKumar-yl8jx 5 ай бұрын

I just casually watched a bit of your video and found that you wrote current density vector equal to current upon Area vector. It’s wrong way to write this way as division by vector is meaningless. 2:49

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

U wrote it absolutely right but I have considered A cos theta as A vector that is vector component of area

@arijeetpaul7960 5 ай бұрын

j=i/ a vector wtf is vector division lodde boards bhi mat pdha tu

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Bro thanks for your compliment ☺️ I have not divided it by A vector I have divided it by Acostheta that is vector component of area We have written as Avector=Acostheta

@arijeetpaul7960 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishqu wrote something else

@vidyanandsharma2655 5 ай бұрын

❤❤❤❤❤

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

Beta tum galat ho. Zarurat ke hisab se direction di jaati h. Nasa ka ek pdf h , vectors aise hi defined h

@sanayok1 5 ай бұрын

kese type karke explain karu pata nahi sir ne kis perspective se isko bola hai but tumne ek batt boli hai physics ho ya math jarurat ke hisab se nahi nikali jati hai ? according to given problem we study someone way of thinking that a how he understand the way something work. vai god ne math or physics nahi banayi hai its the human way of understanding nature. sir try to explain that pehele kisi ne current scalar treat kar ke apne theory explain kar diya hai just like current flow from positive end of the battery to negetive end but later by experiment we see the different story but still today we learn the mistake part because everything define by assuming that + to - agar currrent ko vector dikhana ho they simply trick by using dl vector the dl is so so small that the direction of lenght of wire and current is same because current move inside wire . (ab yaha pe matt batana direction current bola to mene usko vector bana diya ) now if current (ELECTRON) move in free space there is no dl vector you can assume so more precisely if we assume a AREA from here then came current density (agar e vi explain karna pare reply ke bad kar dunga). now problem is solved in free space also in wire very simple ........ another for you if two vector are in same or opp direction with same unit (magnitude =unit*number) we can treat them as scalar . inside integration we can add only same direction quantity that's why we solve x,y,z differently more example so on may be i wrong. mene ye kitab par ke and problem solve kar ke analysis kar ke sikha mene koi research paper nahi par ke likha its completely my understanding . but mah definitely ye keh sa kata hu tora par lo 😇

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Bro u have written a great explanation 😊 Let's talk Tell me one situation where current follows vector laws. You will not find a single situation. While calculating magnetic field we don't take current as vector we take "current element" where we associate small element "dL" which has direction not the current. Similarly in current density we take projected area which is perpendicular to direction of current so that projected area makes it vector not the current. Also you can treat it like charge density times velocity, here velocity is a vector. In AC calculation we add two currents as a vector but in AC it is not a vector it is a sinusoidal quantity which has some phase and frequency and if we add two different sinusoids with same frequency and different phases then we are actually adding their instantaneous values and it follows phasor concepts not the vector concepts. You can say that two sinusoids of same frequency but different phases can be added with the help of phasors and it is similar to vector addition. We are actually adding two sinusoids of same frequency to get a new sinusoid.Tell me one situation where we take current as a vector. You will find none. Moreover it is not like "jaroorat k hisaab se define krtey hn..."everything in physics have meaning and significance. Let me tell you one more point VerySmall angular displacement can be treated as a vector coz it follows vector rules (standard) while the large or finite angular displacement can not be taken as vector coz it violates the basic rules of vectors. So it's not like" jaroorat k hisaab se define krtey hn" there are standard rules which must be followed by vectors. For deeper understanding read "The Feynman lectures on Physics volume-2"chapter-2 section 2and 3 Volume-1 Chapter-11. From where this confusion came from? When we add current in AC sinusoids (same frequency with different phases) then we can add them by taking it like a vector whose magnitude is max value and phase as single All the best for ur future ♥️😊.

@sanayok1 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishqactually I saw similar comments on sir video.. Actually sir Thora philosophy behind thinking how someone think current should be behaved like scalar or vector. Everything jo ham parte hai o kisi na kisi ke point of view hai . Agar point of view give us power of speculation and power of comparison we accept his thought. By experiment se bhi o apna level up kar ta reheta hai hypothesis to theory to law Mera point ye hai bass ye video bacho ke liye banai gayi hai naki kisi teacher keliye . Ek choti bat ko kaha sa kaha le. Ja rahe ho I give you a example Sir ne class me dx and dt ko is tarike bataya hai ye itna chota number hai ki bhagvan vi soch na sake itna chota hai (Actually dx is length=number ×unit of length and dt=number ×unit of time) Ye bass hum logo Jada se jada jaldi belive dila ne keliye ki Calculus me jo error hai o jo chotu sa o error hai koi bol I na sake . Sir Thora extra chiz ko bolte hai taki baccho ke dimag me jaldi hit kare 😊

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Alright bro mai smj gya this is a teaching peadagogy thanks for rectifying me😊

@soniakumari-k5j 4 ай бұрын

3:03 bhai puri physics tuny parrhi kahan ha.ja jaky parrh phele beta

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comments aap mujhe koi situation btao jha current ko vector mana gya

@creatoragnibhasasmal 5 ай бұрын

Acha bhaiya aapne kaha ki Physics jarurat ke hisab se nhi chalti... Thik hai aapki baat main man leta hun thodi der ke liye... To kyun aap kinematics, NLM, friction, circular motion me body ko particle treat karke padhate hain? Iska jawab bhi aapke paas hona chahiye... Bataiye jara... Aur han... Aapne kaha ki current density ek vector quantity hai jisme current to scalar hai par yahan area ko area vector treat kiya gya hai... Acha aap area ko kya treat karte hain jara bataiyega! Aur current kyun scalar hai, ye bhi bataiyega comment me. Lekin sabse pehle meri pehli sawal ka solution batana...🙏 Thank you.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Ok bro let's answer u Your first question ❓ 1.) Why we treat body as a particle?? Bodies are often assumed to be particles if the rotational motions are negligible when compared to the translational motions, or in systems where there is no moment exerted on the body such as a concurrent force system. Ok bro we don't consider as per our requirement this is because of concept of moment.. 2.) Why I treat Area as a vector quantity? Bro if u watched the full video I have not considered area as vector (by mistakenly I have written A bector that is not actually area vector it is horizontal component of area that is Acostheta we consider it as vector.. 3.) Why current is scalar ❓ It represents the direction of flow of positive charge but it is treated as a scalar quantity because current follows the laws of scalar addition and not the laws of vector addition, And bro u can explain me any situation in physics where u consider current as vector ☺️ Hope you understand it very well... I am just correcting the mistake btw Nms sir is a legend teacher!! May your dedication and hard work lead you to great success in your preparation! God bless you for your future☺️☺️

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

I have explained your query♥️

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

I have not considered area as a vector quantity I have considered component of area that is vector horizontal component as vector quantity ☺️

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

Hc verma ne bhi bola h current scalar hota h. Or tensor of order 0 Vectors are those quantities which hv magnitude and need direction to define them. Aisa kehna that they have direction , ye galat h Mujhe lagta h to galat Pandey se padhe ho

@RohitIqbal-te2hz 2 күн бұрын

NMS sir is right. Listen him carefully with learning attitude.

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

It is written as I/A n cap. Never in division u write vectir quantity. These days koi bhi samjhane aa jata h

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

If ia m wrong refer to Feynman lecture series available on yt the same concept you will get there 😊

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq I hv the 3 volumes of fynman lectures. I suggest u buy them. And I sent u nasa link. May be even nasa is wrong

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

@@Thephysicsplace absolutely true plz reas that 3 volumes i respect your opinion if I am wrong I am sorry but plz try to understand the point Sbt sir had also made a video on it

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq I can't even argue on this. U are wrong. Plus u made a blunder too by dividing with vector

@avijitsaha4467 4 ай бұрын

Are bhai sir current density ko vector bole hai naki current ko.

@ssssbw6337 Ай бұрын

Good

@Sonkersaab 6 ай бұрын

I've seen this video and it's completely fine that such type of ego wasn't suitable for any reputed teacher ....

@FeelingPhysics 4 ай бұрын

Those who are telling him that he needs to study more they need to get a medical check up urgently they are affected by "god teacher syndrome" 😂. I want to tell them atleast the guy making this video showed some logic and explained but your god teacher just passed a statement without any proof or logic 😂. I don't believe they are from arts or commerce stream even SBT Sir has made a video on this matter. The guy making this video is really doing good job👏

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comment someone understand it i never disrespect Nms sir he is a legend teacher . I only raise my point

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

Aur beta area vevtor tum divide mai kaise likh sakte ho

@Rohitsgrv 4 ай бұрын

😂😂😂 ye physics me hota h....

@clivd 6 ай бұрын

Aur physics mai zaroorat ke hisab se chiz lete hai, kya hi gyan pel raha hai tu, just take example of thermodynamics, we take sign convention different than chemistry's one because that convention is better suited for physics

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

Bro you are completely wrong" PHYSICS ME KOI BHI CHEEJ JAROORA KE HISAB SE NHI LETE HR CHEEJ KA SIGNIFICANCE HOTA HAI" mai ego se nhi bol rha hu aapka concept clear krta hu listen 👂 Aapne THERMODYNAMICS ki baat ki Krte hai Formula of work done = P∆Vcostheta Now in chemistry we take external work as reference and in physics we take internal work as reference.. Let's first talk about PHYSICS Let's take the case of expansion in piston system in expansion internal pressure dominate jb internal pressure badha to volume bhi badhi dono ki direction same then cos theta =1 and it is positive Then WORK DONE IS POSITIVE Now let's talk about chemistry In expansion Here external pressure dominates Jb expansion hua to volume badhi and in this case external pressure jo upar se pressure pad rha tha and volume badhi dono ki direction opposite To fir cos theta =-1 that's why work done is -PV AB PHYSICS ME KOI BHI CHEEJ JAROORAT KE HISAB SE NHI LI JATI AB agr aapko abhi bhi ye chutiyapa lga hai then God bless you with success and fortune😊

@selimakhtar4909 6 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq bro you are wrong.. thermodynamics main Jo heat ka sign ka convection physics main liya jata hai us ka logic chemistry ke logic se bohot jyada weak just because physicists don't want to change the past convection they didn't change the sign convection.... NMS sir ne isi myth ko torne ke liye videos banani suru Kari... Physics-e-ishq is good but Ishq main andha ho jana is so bad

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

@@selimakhtar4909koi na bro Maine Jo explaination diya usme aap ek mistake do but it's not your fault kyoki jee me bhut deep nhi padhna hota abhi aap jee ke syllabus se bahr nikal ke padhoge tb aapko ye apne aap clear ho jayega ye concept!! All the best for your future 😊

@selimakhtar4909 6 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq magnetic field ke calcultaion pain haam jo dl lete hain usmain dl ka direction according to the direction of current lete hain... and current density main bhi area vector ka direction current flow ke according hi lete hain ... to saari chison ka direction current ke direction se influenced hai.. and sir ka point bhi iye hi tha ki keunki hamne current ko pehle se ek scaler quantity bana ke rakha hai to jab hame vector ki jarurat padi tab scientist ne us jarurat ko mitane ke liye dorse vector quantities ka use kara ... i am not pointing that you are wornog but actually for me the logic you used is wrong and You tell us chutiya so explain me why physics main jo thermodynamics main heat ka sign convicteion liya jata hai wo physically galat hain ..(and i study in jadavpur univerty electrical engineerig and our teacher said that that sign convection is physically wrong) and iyhan koi tumhe gaali bhi nehi de raha to dusro ko gaali dene se pehle soch liiya karo AND THANKS FOR GREETINGS☺

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

First thing bro Maine kbhi bhi chutiya word aapke liye use nhi kra ya kiski ke liye bhi aap dekh skte Thanks for your reply!

@Abhinav0721 5 ай бұрын

Chalo tumhari baat sahi maani. 3:00 phir tum ye kyu keh rahe ho ki area is vector quantity ?????

@Abhinav0721 5 ай бұрын

Hum to bachpan se padh rahe hai, area scalar hai

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

True u have studied correct I have not considered area as vector I have considered component of area is vector which is used in calculation of current density

@Notme-gp2pg 5 ай бұрын

The word you used "CONSIDERED" itself gives you all the answers to your questions asked to nms sir@@physics-e-ishq

@Abhinav0721 5 ай бұрын

wahi to keh rahe hai NMS sir jarurat ke hisab se hame area ko bhi vector maanna pada...... Hope you understand

@Abhinav0721 5 ай бұрын

bas hamne directly ye nahi kaha ki area vector hai ,instead hamne apni baat ko parakhne ka tarika change kar diya by saying that component of area is vector .But indirectly baat to vahi hi hai na(ki hamne jarurat ke hisab se usko vector maan liya).........

@yusufahmed7168 6 ай бұрын

beta pahle physics sikho phir padho tumhe physics ki p bhi nahi atti hai , ajj kal youtube pe koi bhi teacher ban jata hai

@hustling_prodigy34 5 ай бұрын

Aaap apna dekho wo sahi sikha Raha hai usko support karo

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for ur comment 😊 Best of luck for your future

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comments Best of luck for your future 😊 aapko topic pe counter question krna chaiye this shows your knowledge and understanding

@saini1056 4 ай бұрын

Pahele tu Sikh k aa issme ek dum shu bataya h bhai ne

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

@@hustling_prodigy34wo division mai vector le gaya aur tum sahi lag raha hai. Kya galat(alakh) Pandey se padhte ho

@KeshavKumarPandeySir 5 ай бұрын

I feel you also made a mistake while defining current density. A vector can be divided ( I mean Vector can never be denominator). So actually current is dot product of current density and Area Vector. Direction of current density is taken in the direction of current. What I feel what NMS sir was trying to explain physics is Developed according to our need to understand natural phenomenon. We know current is scalar quantity and when we have to calculate maganetic field due to current we have to make it vector so we associated a dl vector along with the current.. and similarly in other cases also.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

I have divided it by Acostheta that is vector component of area I have denoted it by A vector ... Thanks for your comments 😊Best of luck for ur future

@physicscapsule5579 5 ай бұрын

True we can't divide by a vector 👍

@vaibhav_thrives 6 ай бұрын

Area is not a vector quantity Area is a scalar. Area Vector is different from Area.

@vaibhav_thrives 6 ай бұрын

HC verma sir ne ispe video bhi bana rakhi h.

@AnmolSaxena-ox6cb 6 ай бұрын

Area is not a vector quantity it's projection is vector quantity ... For calculating current density we have to take components of area that's why it is considered as area vector.

@rajwardhan.6345 5 ай бұрын

NMS sir IITIAN, and you?

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Good reply bro He is an iitian i respect him but there are plenty of successful teachers who are not iitian still they are creating big For eg. Alakh sir,Pankaj sir etc... All the best for ur future 😊

@sagekurama2777 5 ай бұрын

Double single double 😂😂😂😂@@physics-e-ishq

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

😂😂 negative single double resonance sucks😂😂

@pankajkumartowar3070 4 ай бұрын

My dear area vector can not be written in denominator

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

Thanks for ur comment I have considered acos theta horizontal component of area as area vector

@HappyIndians-q1o 4 ай бұрын

Beta tum nm sir ki baat ko samjhe bhi nahi Aur unpr tippani karne lage Zaroorat se zyada tippani karna, useless hota hai

@manassrivastav7499 5 ай бұрын

bhaia dl vector ka derivation pr video banna aap

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Sure☺️

@kartikrathore5720 6 ай бұрын

current scalar vector ki devate alag, tume area vector se divisiom kr diya. vector se divisio kv se possile hua

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

I am not dividing by area vector you are absolutely true I am dividing by horizontal component of area Acostheta we denote it by A vector

@rashmiparida5816 5 ай бұрын

Area is scalar.area ko vector bolta he.kahan se padha he.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Bro I have considered component of area that is Acostheta as vector I have denoted that as vector Best of luck for ur future ☺️

@Vaibhav_Solanki. 6 ай бұрын

Permanent Pushpa Style ✅️

@PankajTiwari-ov9dj 4 ай бұрын

Sb sahi hai jrurat k hisab se ,jo mn kre le lo🎉

@physicslover4203 4 ай бұрын

Ese to area bhi vector nhi tha but baad me physisist ne jrurat ke hisab se magnetic/ electric Flux ko define krne ke liye vector bna diya 😂

@raghav3396 5 ай бұрын

Current density ko vector bola hai undone bhai

@AniketModak-j9e 5 ай бұрын

Abe vai tu pehle padle mai iisc pe hu ,,, current element direction current jidhar hota hai udhar hi lete hai ,,,,,current rank 0 tensor hai ye vai ek quantity hai isme kaun sahi kaun galat itna debet karke fayda kya ,,,ha aur cureent tune jo likha hai 😂 wo hi galat hai pehle physics ko samajh samajhne ka bad ego vi hat jayega,,, current is simply define as q/t current ek scaler hai ,,,,aur current ke bad current density define kiya 🙂,,,aur sach batau ye hum jarurat ke hisab se hi karte hai ,,,,,kavi prasna kiya hai ki j .A hi kyu current ki equal kiya because current ko hum pehele se hi scaler mana tha ,,,,,,aur ek scaler negative positive dono hi ho sakta hai jaisa flux negative aye to incoming positive aye to outgoing aise hi to fir batayega flux ka vi direction fir vi scaler 🙂

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Bro aap iisc ho great thing I am from HBTI kanpur Ye nhi matter krta And I never disrespect Nms sir he is a legend teacher Aapne bola current tensor hai it's right sir ne jo bola apni video me ki current ko vector lete aap mujhe puri physics me 1 situation btado jha current vector jo Or rhi baat flux ki to usko bhi apni jarurat se nhi lete it is depend upon the angle between E and A . That's why it is positive and negative Best of luck for your future ☺️

@AniketModak-j9e 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq galat conception,,,accha wait apne video me bataya ki current density vector hai area vector hai isliye okay ,,let's do i=5 ampeare and suppose in 3d space the area vector of any area on 3d equal to 2 i+3j ab ap j jab niklonge kya i se divide karoge😂,,,,aur flux ki bich me positive negative wo hi to bata raha hu ki hum kahete hai outgoing aur incoming according to sign which I chose right to aise hi current ka vi hum batate hai direction hai but direction hone se hi wo vector nahi hota jab direction ki effect se hum deal karte hai tab usko rank 1 tensor bolte hai means vector and current simple scaler algebra follow karta hai isliye current scaler hai ........isme debet ka kya hi hai ,,,nms sir vi Aisa kuch galat information provide nahi ki,,,unka bolne ka najariya alag tha ,,,agar hum simple current ki bat kare to its scaler undoubtedly because it is simply define as rate of flow of charge in any cross section it's not define as j.a it is equal to j.a...

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@yusufahmed7168 6 ай бұрын

teacher nahi baana hai phale sikhna phir sikhna hai social median influncer banna hai toh physics mat padho mujara karo waise hi ban jaoge , nms sir se panga lene ki koi jarurat nhai hai

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

Thanks for your feedback Brother I am not disrespecting NMS sir Firstly understand what I am saying but u will not able to understand because abhi aap jee syllabus ke andar ho jaise hi bhr nikloge jee syllabus se aapko samjh aayega.. Thanks Wishing u a good fortune😊

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

Bro agar aap itne knowledgeable hai to concept defend kro ...😊

@sumityadav7nastik.with.science 4 ай бұрын

Jo students kuch jyada gahrai me jakar physics padega uska score gharab aayega competition me

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

Absolutely true ❣️🔥

@Fatah-m2y 5 ай бұрын

Actually your are showing your ego, kabhi NMS sir ke batch me as a student beth ke dekhna wo us beizzati ko ko "I love that beizzati" jhan unka student unhe galat prove karta h , plz dont call that unka ego kharab hai [ student of NMS sir ]

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Ok glad to hear that ☺️

@dynamitecrew8153 5 ай бұрын

Vhai what is ur level in physic and u are making video on nms sir....pehley physic samkho vhai...current kya hey u know..

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Bro u are asking about level I am studying In HBTI college scoring 98% in jee mains physics and 60% marks in jee adv physics Ye sb matter nhi krta Maine bs btaya hai sir ne kya usme musconcept btaya and aap puch rhe ho current kya hai It is rate of directional flow of charge and puri detailed video jee adv 2024 ka soln channel pe hai usme bataya hai maine Thanks Best of luck for your future ☺️

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@kids_tution4890 4 ай бұрын

what was your jee rank? nms rank 368

@yaswanths1224 2 күн бұрын

Tereko 1k subscriber bi nahi hua h par bade bade log ko galat bolne ka aukat hai😂😂😂 sabse galti hoti h, no human is perfect

@rahulchennai-yd9dr 4 ай бұрын

Nms sir is an excellent teacher

@UNDERGRADPHYSICS 4 ай бұрын

3:13 Learn new concept division by vectors😅 keep it up and destroy physics 😂

@physics-e-ishq 4 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comments Great sarcasm I have considered vector component of area Acostheta as A vector 😊

@Adi-lr9lx 5 ай бұрын

beta aukat se bahar ke admi ke saath comparision nahi karte hai

@firewingff7010 5 ай бұрын

Abe jaa na yaha se jaa jake nms sir se padh le

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for ur comment 😊 mujhe lga aap topic pe counter question krenge

@dilshadraza15793 4 ай бұрын

Nice brother..mujhe bhi lgta tha ki vin Diesel 😂😂 kuch jyada hi dusre ke videos ko glt bata tha.nice work

@Thephysicsplace 4 ай бұрын

@@dilshadraza15793 tum log kya alakh ( galat Pandey) se padhe ho. Ya physics padhte time Nashe mai the. Is bachche ne video mai physics ka antim sanskar kar diya hai. Vector quantity are those which require a direction to specify. And not which have direction. Nms ne bilkul sahi bataya hai Aur pehle is bachche se bolo division mai vector nahi likhte

@SuperNilesh123 4 ай бұрын

u need to study or be a good listener. u r Moulding your lecture by your way

@rohitasl4448iiser 4 ай бұрын

Aree bachha tum unke samne 1 mahine ke bachhe ho ,tum chale ho sir ko expose karne😂😂

@anmol76 6 ай бұрын

Sahi bol rahe hai sir aap😊

@SatyamPandey-06 5 ай бұрын

😂😂😂😂😂 Good marketing technique By exposing famous people's

@utkarshsrivastava9232 6 ай бұрын

Nice editing bro and content 💫⚡️

@NoobH66 5 ай бұрын

Bhai fleming left hand 😅😅😅😅

@gulabtank7356 4 ай бұрын

Aap sikh lo pahele ... Uske bad Nms sir ko kuch bolo

@1234569312 5 ай бұрын

This video must reach to NMS sir and ideally he must make a video to respond

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Please share it to NMS sir

@1234569312 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq I don't have his personal email id.... You have raised a valid point...

@RanjanYadav-sy3gg 6 ай бұрын

Sir aap jobhi ho videos ko bich me se cut karke tej nahii bano reels chup chap banao aapki aukat nahi hai nms sir ko roast karne ki

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

So thankful of you brother Nms sir is a legend teacher but aise brainwash hone se koi fayda nhi aap ek baar concept samjho but koi na soon u will understand... PHYSICS concept ko defend kro na teacher ko nhi😂 Wishing u a good fortune

@PrashantRai202 5 ай бұрын

Bhai kisko sikha rha h tu...ab bete bhi baap ko sikhayenge...badhiya h

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Best of luck for your future bro 😊 mai kisiko nhi dikha rha and NMS sir he is a legend teacher but aapko topic pe counter question krna chaiye

@PrashantRai202 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq bhai kuchh bhi ho pr aapka comments Dil jeet liya...pr bhai aapke video me koi logic nhi tha.

@PrashantRai202 5 ай бұрын

@@physics-e-ishq bhai kuchh bhi ho pr aapka comments Dil jeet liya...pr bhai aapke video me koi logic nhi tha.

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks ♥️😊 We will work on our content

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@mrcscienceclasses2006 4 ай бұрын

tumhe abhi aur study karni chahiye

@AryanRoy-cb3hf 6 ай бұрын

Nice video and very tact explanation..... that too in the most humble way possible...🎉

@yusufahmed7168 6 ай бұрын

beta physics ke baap se panga nahi liya jata , teri aukat hi kaya hai ki nms sir ke sath tera nam liya jaye

@physics-e-ishq 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your comments hars off to your understanding 😊

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын

@physics-e-ishq 6 ай бұрын

Nms sir is a very great teacher maine unki khi bhu disrespect nhi ki But aap lig ki ye chutiya kha samjha payega mai hr comment ka clear explanation de rha hu but jb aap jee dyllabus se bhr nikloge aapko samajh aayega its not ur fault... Wishing you all ALL THE BEST for ur future 😊

@priyanshuiit3235 4 ай бұрын