This Skill Will SAVE Your Poker Career | Introducing TRUE EV

[@nhocyuki1997]

you love your KZbin's audiances,and yeah we love your contents, thank you

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

You’re welcome. Great to have you watching

[@Radovan38740]

I honestly think that this is the best free poker content out there today, good job. I'm also guilty of overusing GTO solutions and not respecting true EV and it took quite a big toll on my results compared to my pre solver gameplan which was based on true EV even tho I didn't realize that at that time..it was superior gameplan for midstakes and lower

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Yep, my game fell to pieces back in 2015 when I got a bit too solver obsessed. That said solver work is responsible for a lot of my growth too. Once you reach a strong level of understanding WHY theory says what it says, you can take or leave a GTO play depending on the situation and that freedom is where the skill level can really increase dramatically.

[@Radovan38740]

@@CarrotCornerPoker Ye, i am at that phase when gto makes a mess of my play and working on some calibration but I know Its essential to have strong theory foundation and that this is temporary turbulance. Bit too overwhelmed right now but I believe I can benefit from this much studying long term once I create good gameplan based on this new knowledge. Gl at tables and thanks for your content:)

[@rudiscoo]

Didn't get to see the goats on stream, but I'll take them here. Thanks for the excellent poker instruction!

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Next stream maybe we can bring one up to the office…

[@Tomasz_Siwiec]

Thanks Pete.

[@Michaelperry1985]

Best poker content on KZbin. Hell, best content on KZbin

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Thanks Michael!

[@aidenmonahan1049]

Great video pete!

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Thanks Aiden my guy

[@Johnny-cz2wv]

Interesting stuff! The x bet bet line in mtts is actually underbluffed in mtts, probably because they cbet flops too much? Anyhoo, no data to back it up just 15yrs experience

[@Johnny-cz2wv]

To add; the 0 50 140 line on low flop seems like a reg who studies the game. Bad regs or recs dont take this line

[@beherapunya21]

I want to buy your courses but i don't have the master card or Visa pls gimme a simplified payment method

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

You can also pay via PayPal and Stripe on the website.

[@TradingDash]

so true EV is the EV of every spot we can deviate and exploit? if there is no profitable deviation the True EV will be always the EV of the GTO play , is that right? ty Pete

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

It’s the EV of every spot in reality due to what your opponent is actually doing / not in theory where your opponent is a solver and so are you!

[@TradingDash]

@@CarrotCornerPoker i understand 100% now , great content brother!

[@JanikaPoker]

I think 45s hand could be played much better by bluffing much smaller. Recs are very inelastic about the sizing, so whatever sizing you use on river, they ll never fold 2p+ and many of those are still not folding even Ax. So if you just bet like 80% otr they still fold everything worse than Ax.

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Yeah I think I overcooked the sizing a bit, I think a smaller overbet will just yield very similar fold equity. I think saying recs ‘never fold’ two pair plus is too strong, but I agree they’re bad at determining the relative hand strength of these hands and do under fold them in most spots.

[@supportGEM]

Do you stick to your regular bet sizes and adjust your frequency of different hand classes according to the tendency of your opponent/the pool, or do you use different sizes to "manipulate" your opponents instead? Take the 45dd overbet bluff hand as an example. If your perceive villain's checking range to be too capped and will overfold vs the overbet, do you just exploitatively overbluff using this size and value bet your strong hands using another size(e.g. B75)? Or do you still just stick to your overbet/check sizing scheme and still value bet using the overbet size but just add extra bluffs? Thanks Pete, great contents as usual. I have been following your coaching videos from runitonce. Always high quality!

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

No reason not to adapt both of these things if you see a reason to.

[@stevejerky1816]

little algo treat for the true🐐

[@The_Life_Shoequatic]

About the AJo hand on the monotone board. You are right on flop, Solver is essentially indifferent on flop. Mixes X and bet 45/55. With equities at 55 IP and 45 OOP for range. Your combo does have essentially equal EV for betting all sizes and X on flop. You are right on Turn, as well. There is essentially equal EV to X and bet all sizes on turn. Perhaps you are telling us when there is no clear EV advantage play, diverge from solver to exploit player pool tendencies. Use TrueEV!

[@samu5381]

nothing can save my poker carrer Pete, not even you

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

I will keep trying!

[@mathgrrrrl]

I am furious! JK Great video! 🤩

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

It was just one little treat though…

[@daviddivad777]

sup

[@crzytimes1]

dog

[@CarrotCornerPoker]

Shut up