This Teaching From the Catholic Church Is VERY Dangerous

[@PreacherwithoutaPulpit]

Thank you Pastor Walker and all those at G3 for this faithful exposition, not exegesis based in fancy and fable, but pure exposition of His Word. Col 3:10-11 "but Christ is all and in all". There's so much imported to us in the above verses, just seven words in length when getting down to the root of their meaning, One of which far outshines the others. So much more is being said in these verses than many will ever know or come to understand. Num 6:24-26 for you, yours and all those around you.

[@patrickc3419]

My family and I were very graced and edified to meet and hear Virgil Walker last year at the G3 National Conference.

[@JohnMoog-ug6bk]

“But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.” - Matt 15:9

[@kimwolf1708]

I rarely Amen things on social media, but Amen, Brother, Amen.

[@OwenBanks-zl8yt]

Well said & expressed to our family & to your flock. A fine post that speaks to the changes that have seeped into the Catholic Church & destroyed its own biblical certitude in Christ alone---also known as "sola scriptura." A welcomed post! God bless you.

[@juliescheving7951]

Perhaps one of the greatest and most solid sermons I have ever heard. (And I worked for the Southern Baptist Convention for 20+ years, so I’ve heard more than a few.) Thank you all for your rock solid faithfulness! Or should I say Solid Rock?!

[@JohnMarchione-y2p]

Great job Pastor Walker, really enjoyed working through the G3 Workshop with you!

[@ruthseilern5400]

GLORY TO GOD IN THE HIGHEST!!🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾

[@GinaRM444]

I don’t see this title as click bait. He told you what is so dangerous from the Catholics - they have added to scripture and that’s very dangerous. They have a false gospel.

[@JoySmith-MY0B]

6:50 the difference is that 1) people were a lot more amenable to “progressive” ideas two and four years ago at the height of George Floyd response, etc. 2) people had multiple years to see that their “progressive” peacocking didn’t actually amount to delivering results for their districts. Voters were sold a vision that didn’t measure up in reality, so they made a different choice this time around. Good for NYC & STL.

[@joeycrack4294]

Beautiful and Thank you....

[@benmig5037]

Love Virgil

[@LJSAZ]

Amen and amen. Thank you.

[@faiqsabir7835]

prayer from Pakistan ..

[@Randy-v9x]

And if you walk away from Roman Catholicism, they will pursue and houmd you until you cammit ?????

[@rocketscientisttoo]

Rome knows its own history which is why they are trying to distance Rome and from being identified with the church that is headquartered in the Vatican. They no longer call themselves the Roman Catholic church but the "Catholic" church, and what does the word catholic mean? It means universal, as in the universal church. God, through Peter - the supposed founder of Roman Catholicism, wrote “Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.” Acts 4:12

[@bibleman8010]

Roman Catholic Church,” The term originates as an insult created by Anglicans who wished to refer to themselves as Catholic. They thus coined the term “Roman Catholic” to distinguish those in union with Rome from themselves and to create a sense in which they could refer to themselves as Catholics (by attempting to deprive actual Catholics to the right to the term). Different variants of the “Roman” insult appeared at different times. The earliest form was the noun “Romanist” (one belonging to the Catholic Church), which appeared in England about 1515-1525. The next to develop was the adjective “Romish” (similar to something done or believed in the Catholic Church), which appeared around 1525-1535. Next came the noun “Roman Catholic” (one belonging to the Catholic Church), which was coined around 1595-1605. Shortly thereafter came the verb “to Romanize” (to make someone a Catholic or to become a Catholic), which appeared around 1600-10. Between 1665 and 1675 we got the noun “Romanism” (the system of Catholic beliefs and practices), and finally we got a latecomer term about 1815-1825, the noun “Roman Catholicism,” a synonym for the earlier “Romanism.” A similar complex of insults arose around “pope.” About 1515-25 the Anglicans coined the term “papist” and later its derivative “papism.” A quick follow-up, in 1520-1530, was the adjective “popish.” Next came “popery” (1525-1535), then “papistry” (1540-1550), with its later derivatives, “papistical” and “papistic.” (Source: Random House Webster’s College Dictionary, 1995 ed.) This complex of insults is revealing as it shows the depths of animosity English Protestants had toward the Church. No other religious body (perhaps no other group at all, even national or racial) has such a complex of insults against it woven into the English language as does the Catholic Church. Even today many Protestants who have no idea what the origin of the term is cannot bring themselves to say “Catholic” without qualifying it or replacing it with an insult.

[@bibleman8010]

Cyril of Jerusalem “[The Church] is called catholic, then, because it extends over the whole world, from end to end of the earth, and because it teaches universally and infallibly each and every doctrine which must come to the knowledge of men, concerning things visible and invisible, heavenly and earthly, and because it brings every race of men into subjection to godliness, governors and governed, learned and unlearned, and because it universally treats and heals every class of sins, those committed with the soul and those with the body, and it possesses within itself every conceivable form of virtue, in deeds and in words and in the spiritual gifts of every description” (Catechetical Lectures 18:23 [A.D. 350]).

[@markrogers7546]

@@bibleman8010Sorry, but you have turned what is simply a distinction into an insult. The Catholic Church is more than the Roman Catholic Church.. But the Church of Rome has strayed so far from the truly Catholic faith (as laid out in the Bible) that it is no longer worthy of the name "Catholic".

[@bibleman8010]

@@markrogers7546 so says the irrecoverably ignorantly heretic

[@Andy-m8b]

If anybody has a wooden "beam" in their eye trying to remove a "speck" out of another would be the Calvinists correcting the Catholics.

[@jasonc4430]

Keep worshipping that piece of bread as if it were Jesus.

[@Randy-v9x]

Sick, remorseless blasphemous idolatry. Y'all easy lighting kingsford edge charcoal. Silly cannibals, tricks are for prostitutes - NOT homosexual pedophile priests, bishops cardinals

[@toolegittoquit_001]

Preceded by an ad for The Chosen 😐

[@Et_2_Brute]

Did this Guy read Matthew chapter 5?

[@mary-xk9dc]

look at England know, God is far from then. heresy is found in the church of England.

[@Rightlydividing-wx1xb]

So is Calvinism's 9 points -not just 5 called Tulip.

[@UnknownGhost06]

Guys, please stop it with the click bait titles. Just give it a decent title and done. Seriously

[@holisticcoach.monique]

So you don't think that anything that deviates from the truth of the gospel is very dangerous?

[@paulallenscards]

@@holisticcoach.moniqueuse your brain to a fuller capacity monique

[@dove4108]

I think in this case the title is appropriate.. the Catholic Church is not named but Paul urgently warns about being taken by human philosophy and deceit. ( e.g. Catholic tradition)

[@dove4108]

But I agree with you that clickbait in general is annoying

[@paulallenscards]

@@dove4108 I do wonder how you think the doctrine of the trinity came to be established if not for some combination of human intellect and experience?

[@gracehillcolorado2668]

The Christian Gospel is GRACE. Preach anything else? And you're not getting it. GET FREE!

[@philipbuckley759]

salvation, by faith, alone....a teaching, by Luther, because he ignored both the Book of James, and Hebrews...

[@AisleofHeaven]

Any works mentioned alongside faith in the bible are works of obedience, not works of merit or works of the law. So to activate our faith, we do things that reveal our love for God and our neighbors. Such are the works Jesus mentions when He talks about separation of Sheep from goats (the righteous from the wicked). These works themselves do not save, but they are part of our sanctification. When we believe in JESUS that He is our savior and confess, we're justified. Then we go on to do works, such as prayer, worship, helping the needy, giving, etc, for our sanctification, as we wait for glorification in the end. All that is salvation.

[@Jamesps34]

🤦‍♂️

[@mickyhaz3649]

always good to a get a bit of proto comedy. Typical hodge podge of proto accusations levelled against The Catholic Church, which is The One and Only Church that Christ established - His only Bride (He ain't a polygamist!) More than happy to field any objections anyone here has against The Catholic Church - however, I have a few conditions, and they are more than reasonable: 1. No scatter-gun approach. This is a typical approach protestants often have when raising objections with Catholics, where they come with an array of of various different objections all at the same time. More than happy to deal with various objections, but one. at. a. time. (thanks!) 2. If you can dish out objections, be open and honest enough to accept honest answers, even if they're not convenient (and perhaps cause you to question any deeply held protestant belief and/or any pre-existing anti-Catholic narrative you may have) 3. Respect and courtesy both ways 4. Have the truth - whole and undefiled - as the objective. If that causes you to re-think what you've been taught to date about Catholicism, then be big and honest enough to admit it - and all that that requires, eg. conversion (which ties in with point #2). I make these points, since I've generally encountered the same pattern in dialoging with protestants on such things in the past. Pax....

[@justfromcatholic]

According to the Reformers justification is once for all and is therefore is by faith alone. Is this teaching scriptural?The phrase "justified by faith" appears four times in New Testament (Rom. 3:28, 5:1, Gal. 2:16, 3:24). New Testament was written in Greek and the one in Rom. 3:28 is in Greek passive present tense while the rest are in Greek passive aorist tense . Both tenses do not indicate once for all justification. If Scripture teaches faith-alone justification, then the Holy Spirit would inspire Paul to write the phrase "justified by faith" in Greek passive perfect tense . According to the Reformers through faith alone justification we are counted as righteous but remains unrighteous - in Latin "simul iustus et peccator". But according to Scripture (Rom. 5:19) through Christ we are made righteous. Is being made righteous necessary for our salvation? Scripture says death is the wages of sin (Rom. 6:23) and the soul that sins shall die (Eze. 18:4). It is righteousness that delivers from death (Pro. 10:2, 11:4). “Whoever is steadfast in righteousness will live” (Pro. 11:19). “In the path of righteousness is life, and in its pathway there is no death” (Pro. 12:28). Jesus said in Mat. 25:46 that the righteous shall go to eternal life. According to the Reformers through faith alone believers get Christ' righteousness imputed on them as if it were theirs while Christ got all their sins (past, present, and future) imputed on Him as if those sins were His - it is known as double imputation. But Scripture denies double imputation in Eze. 18:20: “The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

[@anovino1992]

That's the very thing , this teaching is about, those who want to explain what they think the word of is saying in their own word. Vain, words, empty words.

[@HearGodsWord]

​@@anovino1992 vain, empty words is all they have when they don't believe the truth. That's why the Reformation was needed so badly.

[@mary-xk9dc]

Christ in me the hope of glory!

[@anovino1992]

@@mary-xk9dc Amen

[@justfromcatholic]

@@anovino1992 Can you reconcile your belief with the verses and Greek tenses I cited?

[@JRRodriguez-nu7po]

This is a solid sermon. So let no one drag you back to Moses, as the Reformers did. Shabbat was never changed to Sunday and neither is a commanded observance to Christians. If a law is not given in the newest Testament, then having been fulfilled ot is layed aside like a paid off debt.

[@mchristr]

How are you doing on the other 9 Commandments? If you really care about settling this issue, please see Hebrews. The Sabbath isn't a particular day but rather rest.

[@EphSBGGSO]

I don’t think you even understand your own comment. The Reformers did not drag anyone back to Moses. The Reformers led the world back to Christ and back to the truth of Scripture. They broke the chains of bondage to the heresies of Roman Catholicism and proclaimed the truths of the five Solas. Moses and Shabbat? Please stop majoring in minors and focus on the main thing….Christ.

[@HearGodsWord]

Swing and a miss from JR

[@JRRodriguez-nu7po]

@@HearGodsWord The 10 commandments were only ever for national Israel and being fulfilled by Christ, are now as Paul says, like an honorable former schoolmaster that have no authority over us. Does that mean I am free to murder? No, because I am under the Law of Christ as given through his Apostles in this aeon. While SOME of the rules (9/10) may not only remain the same but be even stricter, the authority for those rules has changed. Moses specifically said not to listen to him once Christ came. The Jerusalem council in Acdts 15 settled that. Y'all are semi-judiezers who pick and choose what is convenient to you via traditions of men what of Moses to enforce. This adding of traditions of men to the rules of God began somewhere between Gen 2 and 3.

[@HearGodsWord]

@@JRRodriguez-nu7po you're more confused than I first thought!

[@aussierob7177]

Requirerements for salvation have nothing to do with what Christ did on the cross.

[@Hakeem597]

What!? Repentance and Faith are required for salvation. it is what the gospel requires....placing your faith in the person and work of Jesus Christ. (Ephesians 2:8-10).

[@HearGodsWord]

Christ on the cross has everything to do with salvation

[@toolegittoquit_001]

Without Christ's death on the Cross there is no salvation

[@aussierob7177]

@@toolegittoquit_001 Baptism is necessary for salvation.

[@karoleenascottage]

@@aussierob7177 Read the New Testament and see that baptism is an outward demonstration of a Christian’s conversion. Salvation is faith alone in Christ alone. Getting dunked in water does not save you.

[@timothymcdonald7407]

This poor fella has been brain washed by the chosen one, little Johnny MacArthur. Spit the koolaide out my friend!!

[@crossmethod23]

Bro wut

[@simonskinner1450]

Christ alone is our judge. But Christ can only forgive past sins as Romans 3:25. My latest video 'Is Christianity the truth of the NT? No. #32 Myths in so-called Christianity'.

[@HearGodsWord]

Fallacies are why your videos get so vires!

[@simonskinner1450]

@@HearGodsWord My friend it is mistaken beliefs, or even calculated false teaching in Christianity that has led to my teachings. Even to my just claim that neither Christianity, Judaism or Islam are legitimate as none follow the Torah of Abraham. The NT has the truth, but Christianity divorced from its roots in the 2nd century, now Christianity is plagued by; different theories of the Cross; multi-faceted views in futurism of a another return; a different meaning of faith from the OT; imagining Jesus as God the Father when he was sent by his Father as the Messiah a man under the law. To prevent interrogation of false teachings vested interests call truth as heresies. I cannot corrupt something that cannot be defended as truth.

[@HearGodsWord]

@simonskinner1450 you deny the Christ so you're the one with the mistaken belief.

[@simonskinner1450]

@@HearGodsWord Read Deuteronomy 18:18 God raises up a Prophet from among his people, born of a woman under the law as John 20:31 Jesus is the Messiah. If Jesus is God he is not the Messiah, and vice versa. He speaks the word of God, he impersonated his Father, Jesus said see Jesus see the Father. Jesus was the Godhead bodily. The actual reverse of the Holy Trinity, a man speaking for his Father, who is possessed by the Spirit that raised him to heaven as John 3:13. He was vulnerable, brave with a cause.

[@HearGodsWord]

@@simonskinner1450 he wasn't just a prophet. Read the Bible.

[@averagemanhempgars502]

No one practiced sola anything for the first 1500 years of the church 🤔

[@caroldonaldson5936]

Um....yeah, I think that was part of the problem - it needed saying!

[@meinradjeromelacap9949]

early patristic fathers disagrees with you. its like saying trinity never existed before nicea.

[@wjf0ne]

@averagemanhempgars502 Gutenberg printing press invented 1440. Then there was the problem of literacy. Being able to read and having a Bible to read changed a lot of people who changed their minds on many of the false teachings of the Roman Catholic Church.

[@johnpeavey6557]

No one had a bible except bishops znd they didn't go by it.

[@56pjr]

you are misinformed. Escape the cult of Rome before you die in your sins.