"This Universe Existed before The Big Bang" | 50 Minutes of Mysteries to Fall Asleep To

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Let us know what you think of this new format!

[@hyperduality2838]

@@davemccombs Syntax is dual to semantics -- languages, communication or information. Large language models are using duality. Space is dual to time -- Einstein. The past (everything) is dual to the future (nothing) -- Time duality. We know everything about the past as we have experienced or measured it and we know nothing about the future as it has not happened yet -- everything is dual to nothing synthesizes something (the present). Cause is dual to effect -- causality or correlation. "Physics is what we know and metaphysics is what we do not know" -- Bertrand Russell. Synthetic a prior knowledge -- Immanuel Kant. Knowledge is dual. A posterior or after measurement (the past) is dual to a priori or before measurement (the future) -- Immanuel Kant. Physics (a posteriori, empirical) is dual to mathematics (a priori, rational). Physics is created from empirical observations or measurements -- knowledge (duality). The present is created from the past and the future via duality as time is dual. Absolute time (Galileo) is dual to relative time (Einstein) -- time duality. My absolute time is your relative time and your absolute time is my relative time -- time duality. Time is a dual concept. "Always two there are" -- Yoda. Physics (the past) is dual to metaphysics (the future) -- the future by definition is metaphysical. Thesis (the past) is dual to the anti-thesis (the future) creates the converging or syntropic thesis, synthesis (the present) -- the time independent Hegelian dialectic. Duality creates reality.

[@winkstudio5150]

What if dark energy changes it's behavior at a certain point in future and there will be a starting of the crunching of the universe back to the singularity.

[@Sajuuk]

​@@davemccombs...the fuck are you talking about? AI generated? Your low IQ is AI generated you dimwit. Get off the internet 😂

[@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC]

🎉the history of the universe is infinite. Meaning infinite universe combinations, till us. No room for gods

[@blackfish4147]

where is the link?

[@CatDad01]

gnight everyone. sleep tight. ive been falling asleep to documentaries since 2005.

[@StanTheman-u2z]

ONE OF THESE DAYS YOU WON'T WAKE UP!😮

[@yungswagg8848]

@@StanTheman-u2zgo sym

[@margaritabulatova7591]

Good night! I started in 2012. When I am alone I can't fall asleep without somebody talking.

[@StanTheman-u2z]

@@margaritabulatova7591 WHAT ABOUT IF SOMEBODY KEEPS TEXTING YOU, LIKE I AM DOING NOW? WILL THAT ALSO PUT YOU TO SLEEP?😚🤭

[@adefk]

Same same... it's my sleeping pill

[@silverssonyoutube8438]

What's even more fascinating is that with all the elements in space that everything is in harmony instead of tearing itself apart in chaos

[@bloodymary8540]

Yeah it's like somebody created it

[@rhensontollhouse]

Just as if it was created by an entity with infinite power and intelligence. יהוה

[@mariostroie4408]

I can’t fall asleep when I hear about astrophysics, this make me to stay up late and start thinking about the most random things

[@josephspagnola9884]

Its truly just completely mind bending to try and wrap your brain about how anything started.

[@mikemondano3624]

For my antique Chevy, it was a new carburettor.

[@kamakaziozzie3038]

@@mikemondano3624that’s as logical as what they trying to sell us. all matter once an infinite point 😅

[@fahimp3]

@@kamakaziozzie3038 That not what "they" are telling us, it's the math (+ the expansion of the universe) that points to that conclusion...

[@johnnycash578]

I have theories and opinions its just to effin deep

[@panzerblitz2140]

@@fahimp3 you realize that math is never reality, don't you? for instance a=b and a=0 is an impossibility in the physical universe.. it's just ink splotches humans have scribbled on a piece of paper.

[@jillking5876]

A cyclical universe makes far more sense than one single universe with one single big bang. There has to be something before the big bang, or there would be nothing to make a big bang with. Much of this is speculation on my part, as I am not a scientist, but it doesn't make sense to hang onto one single occurrence to happen. The universal monkey theorem is great, meaning that anything is eventual if you give it enough time, but the human mind can only imagine just so far. Great video.

[@kentonian]

It couldn’t be the universe repeats exactly the same. Always has and always will.

[@panzerblitz2140]

Except that there was no "the big bang" which is a religious belief of the science high priests.

[@kentonian]

@@panzerblitz2140 you have no proof or even local reason for there not have been though

[@ErinnnnL]

Blacks holes. We're in a black hole. That makes the most sense

[@Dave5843-d9m]

@@kentonian Religions say, “I believe X exists - prove me wrong”. BBT does exactly that.

[@zangin]

I really like how you explain things and give examples in layman‘s terms. Thank you! I love your channel.

[@BeeyondIdeas]

You are so welcome!

[@DanielEngsvang]

Well said!. The Narration is really good

[@glenmcd]

Worth not just a thumbs up but subscription as well.

[@kevlark3184]

In laymans terms, theyre making excuses in order to disprove creationalism cause science isnt supporting their beliefs. Like kids playing a game while one keeps changing the rules

[@dougiemuir]

Hahaha I just said the same about explaining the multi verse!! I'm 70 percent Irish and 30 percent Scottish that is my excuse for being daft!?👍👍😎😎❤

[@Monkeybrain3721]

Penrose is one of the most visionary physicists who is not afraid to call out theories that are just maths from those that have a physical reality.

[@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC]

Penroses theories are the ones without math.😮

[@JohnDoe-rq5bz]

@@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC Please elaborate. Ill wait.

[@ReceptiveRaptor]

​@@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC two minutes in Google. You'll need to elaborate or just stop spreading bs.

[@WokeandProud]

All evidence is against his views.

[@JohnDoe-rq5bz]

@@WokeandProud No it isnt..lol!!! Sources please. WokeandProud. I bet you are really smart..lol!!

[@YeshuaDavidson]

The more I watch these documentaries, the more I know nobody knows shiet.

[@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC]

Maybe stop thinking KZbin is truth, and stop dreaming of alien pyramids😂

[@DionPryor396]

​@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC even if man made the pyramids we know there had to been a high civilization with technology we do not have today.. many megolithic stone blocks are so heavy we could put modern cranes around them and still can't move them. obviously the mainstream folks have no clue.

[@TheCompton1963]

😂😂😂😂

[@MrAweeze]

"The first step to true knowledge is to admit you know nothing." -Socrates Now, if only I knew step 2...

[@DeecentAnimal]

@@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOChe didn’t say “sheit” about KZbin being the truth or alien pyramids but I also noticed your handle “vote Biden and AOc” well since you have trouble with comprehension I should point out the democrats have shit the bed and the right is the majority , AOC is ridiculous and Biden is literally demented. Have a nice day 😂😂😂😂😂

[@horaceosirian8993]

Constructive Criticism: The transcript is quite imprecise, and unnecessarily confusing. Examples: 00:15 _"The common understanding was that the Universe underwent rapid expansion, before cooling down."_ You've given absolutely no context about the above scenario, most importantly: when did all of this occur? I assume after the Big Bang, but, er...no data / info to go on leaves the viewer feeling a bit lost. 00:20 _"Then, the first stars and galaxies started to form, during a time we call The Dark Ages."_ What did the stars and galaxies form out of? A brief primer on hydrogen gas clouds forming / growing due to gravity, coalescing into stars, the creation of heavier elements via the solar life cycle, from a starting point of a single element (hydrogen) accounting for all matter in the Universe. 00:37 _"And in some cases, even more mature than astronomers had anticipated."_ Astronomers, or theoretical physicists? 00:40 _"Which raises one of several possibilities."_ It doesn't raise *_one_* of several possibilities; it raises *_several possibilities._* If you think I'm being picky, pls remember, the topic is *_astrophysics_* ;p 00:50 _"Apparently, this finding of ancient galaxies..."_ Is it a finding, or a hypothesis, at this stage...? 01:30 _"Astronomer Vesto Slipher noticed some nabluae were moving away rapidly."_ What are nebulae? What are they moving rapidly away from? (The centre of the Universe? Hogwarts? Cupertino? Mordor? The Bat Cave?) Who was Vesto Slipher...a Slitherin Professor, perhaps? A Harkkonnen Mentat? An agent of Ming, from planet Mongo? By what means did this nebulous Slipher character determine the vector of these so-called _"nebulae;"_ was necromancy or foul sorcery ruled out?

[@plurplursen7172]

For the individual Photon, The Universe is truly static

[@freyatilly]

So, this is truly fascinating. This isn't the first time that a cyclical theory of the universe and our beingness has been proposed. Back in the early centuries of Buddhist thought, (2nd & 3rd cent of european dating), two incredible Indian philosophers, Nagarjuna and Vasubandhu, offered a cosmalogical understanding of the impermanence of all things that also go through the stages of being conceived, born, grow, age, decline, and pass. This includes the vast universe itself. The time frames of the different cycles within cycles were described as kalpers, epochs and aeons. Seems as though science has caught up in a mini circle.

[@mikemondano3624]

Looks like the West beat them by a thousand years. Heraclitus said, "πάντα ρει", seven hundred years before they did. If a person is alive, it is actually pretty obvious.

[@rumble1925]

Two dudes guessed something kind of similar… its not impressive. Penroses theory offers actual explanation of the mechanism and tries to fit it with known laws

[@vikasjaipuria]

Indian philosophy has been screaming about this since all its ancient scriptures! Cyclical universe is something which is not unknown to Indians

[@VOLightPortal]

To undestand Big Bang, we need a Big Bong, and then we can do Big Bang again

[@jorgevial131]

Nothing can exist before existing.

[@Among_Other_Things_Be_Kind]

But is "nothing" really something? Does "existing" refer to a limited but also a specific state?

[@hellfire0332]

What even is "nothing"? Since we live in a Universe where everywhere we look something exists, we've actually no idea what "nothing" is. Therefore, how can we pretend to know anything about it?

[@Ron-l9d]

That's the conundrum....

[@Ron-l9d]

If the definition of "nothing" is the absence of every and anything, then it concludes everything had to come from nothing. I don't agree with that hypothesis but there is no other viable option other then everything is eternal and infinite which does not necessarily require any anthropomorphic robe dudes.

[@IvanTheGreat15]

This was amazing!!! Thanks for sharing it!!

[@therealCamoron]

Over a long enough time span, any degree of precision is not just plausible, but inevitable, and does not require a creator.

[@Webedunn]

Why is it so hard for ppl to realize there is something FAR GREATER than us?? There is endless evidence of non physical, highly intelligent entities that exist and they're not from the 3rd dimension. I believe human arrogance is so vast that we must be at the top of the food chain so we're desperately trying to disprove the puppet master. The smartest man that ever lived said, "the only thing we know for certain is that we know nothing at all." The truth is so insanely BIZARRE that humans aren't capable of grasping even the surface. In fact, this world we reside in is an illusion. Particles appear and act as if they're aware. It's known that if our universe had one more or one less particle life could not exist. Haven't you noticed weird changes that don't make sense? The Mandela effect. The created illusion is making mistakes and I believe on purpose.

[@stormyandcold]

Really? So, if we wait long enough, then, it will only rain in one particular spot on earth and will continue to do so because time makes it possible.

[@Webedunn]

@@stormyandcold he's a "nothing is impossible" guy. Ok, I want someone to stand in the middle of the hywy and swallow a semi full of Oak trees and shit me a new box of Lincoln logs......

[@chriswb7]

Ever since the Big Bang was discovered, atheists have been trying to lawyer their way out of it…without ever having to describe and prove what is beyond a singularity…where math goes to die…which is ironic considering precision is what you seem to prefer…How could you ever prove a cyclical universe without being able to observe anything before the Bang…

[@TheMikesylv]

It took me until 55 to make a decision about god , after watching endless scientific videos, doing my best at looking into organized religion. After one particular realization all the pieces fell into place and I just sat there smiling and feeling quite silly and said to myself of course there’s a god . ( just to be clear nothing to do with organized religion brought me to this conclusion) also I would describe it not as a belief but a “I know “

[@rebeccarakuza2845]

I was listening to this to sleep. Now I'm up pondering life.. usually these things to help me sleep

[@aaronscott8837]

i agree with the cyclic universe concept. after the stars all that will be left is black holes. when the black holes start merging they reach a certain mass called a singularity. that singularity explodes creating a new universe until the black holes merge again and create another.

[@stellarwind1946]

Black holes don’t merge in an expanding universe. They radiate away.

[@aaronscott8837]

@@stellarwind1946 then how do you explain supermassive blackholes??? how do you explain ligo readings that point to a black hole??? yes black holes radiate away at a super slow rate, like trillions of years. however black holes can still merge together and form the supermassive blackholes like the one at the center of the milky way.

[@tazerwazerman]

The BIG BANG is just one of infinite explosions of Black Holes. Not all blow up, like stars they have many types and life cycles. The ones that do well and eat many thousand galaxies get to a point that singularity becomes impossible. I believe the center of all Black Holes rotate at the speed of light.

[@tazerwazerman]

@@stellarwind1946 Many Hubble pictures of space confirm galaxies collide, some combine. That tells me not all galaxies are moving away from each other. We live in the greatest time of discovery, anyone can go on Google and find answers, you just need to ask the correct questions.

[@tazerwazerman]

@@aaronscott8837 The BIG BANG is just one of infinite explosions of Black Holes. Not all blow up, like stars they have many types and life cycles. The ones that do well and eat many thousand galaxies get to a point that singularity becomes impossible. I believe the center of all Black Holes rotate at the speed of light.

[@philosophyforum4668]

The universe cannot be Penrose's, or anyone else's, idea of eternal, because eternity would have already been accomplished, which is a self-contradiction. Scientists can come up with all the crazy ideas they want, but philosophy will always be there to tell them they are contradicting themselves. The universe had a beginning.

[@adeelio83]

The Holy Quran explains all things. "the heavens and the earth were joined together as one unit, before We clove them asunder" (21:30). "The heavens, We have built them with power. And verily, We are expanding it" (51:47).

[@serijas737]

The only way for me to imagine that the universe was just "perfect" in it's creation, enough to neither collapse nor evaporate, is that whatever came before it must have had *alot* of time to make it so.

[@kaalen24]

There is nothing about the universe that suggests perfection. A great deal of wasted potential and stars collapsing. Incredible voids and radioactivity. Danger and chaos everywhere you look. Nothing appears to be created with life in mind. Even the majority of our planet is inhospitable to human life. On one hand you can argue that its complexity is hard to reconcile as random. On the other hand it certainly doesn’t appear to be designed with love or life in mind.

[@LarsGsanger]

No universe A huge diamond Dome is the psysical reality🍏

[@DeecentAnimal]

@@kaalen24​⁠​⁠okay it wasn’t designed around love? Literally no one said it was but it certainly exists just like radiation exists, all possibilities exist and free will exist.. I’m not sure we watched the same video but did you see penrose’s equation and every other example showing how absolutely improbable it is that our universe with these conditions could arise. It certainly doesn’t point to it being random, open like not once in this video was random even mentioned.. yet you seem to think it is.. rewatch the video bc you weren’t able to wrap your head around the topic, open your mind to more possibilities than holding solely onto yours, especially in the face of contradictory evidence…

[@kaalen24]

@@DeecentAnimal Most people believe humans and the universe was created as an act of love. I was not directly quoting the video as you keenly picked up on. I’m stating that the vast wastefulness of the universe, all the planets and areas that don’t appear to be capable of creating or sustaining life is a clue that perhaps none of this has our well being or best interests factored in. There is a great deal of life that is random and I think the universe is clearly operating similarly. I don’t see goals or objectives. I certainly don’t see divine order or the semblance of a plan. And I don’t need to watch the video again to have these observations.

[@kaalen24]

@ Btw, my viewpoint that you claim is falsified by “evidence” is the same view the majority of scientists share and they are keenly aware of the best evidence.

[@raymondtonns2521]

thank you expanding the small universe of my mind

[@scottbuckingham5626]

Imagine a universe much bigger than you predict and there are many big bangs over different time lapses eventually colid with each other like multiple ripple in a pond

[@THOMPSONSART]

Black holes are cosmic vacuums that suck away this universe and reduce the matter into a pin point of matter that reopens later beyond the event horizon to create a new expansion (AKA the big bang in the new universe). This supports the reason every center of galaxy clumps have a blackhole in their center.

[@dddux]

Too interesting to fall asleep to. 😆 Really good doco about stuff I wondered about many times. Thank you! Maybe after watching it multiple times I will be able to fall asleep to it. 😄

[@adilsonsf]

Great video to fall asleep😊

[@buckodonnghaile4309]

"The universe is just a spark flying out of a campfire on the first day of summer....or something...mushrooms taste awful "- my brother 30 years ago.

[@redzisan]

Big bounce!

[@firemanv1]

When you have an infinite amount of time, you're bound to get it right. Even if it was accidentally.

[@adamsetzler]

Just because it was incredibly unlikely that the universe is balanced for consciousness to evolve, does not mean or even suggest there was an architect. An infinity multiplied by anything, no matter how vanishingly improbable, is still a certainty.

[@besamelanalga]

But depends on a small improbable eventuality. What could you call that? Yeah. Something. A hp or architect of sorts.

[@Webedunn]

I love watching science so desperately try to disprove creationism. What you fail to realize is there are at least 8 dimensions with some saying possibly more. The chance that this all just happened is equated to throwing a dart from the moon to the earth and splitting a particular grain of sand exactly in half. There is solid evidence of beings, "intelligent beings" that aren't physical. Typical close minded scientists today claim it's a manifestation from our own mind. Ohhhhhhhh, okeeeeey! In fact it's far more bizarre to say we won a 1:999,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 chance than to say there is something far greater than us (the Master scientist) that started an Ant colony......

[@besamelanalga]

​@@ck58npj72 life? Irrelevant. this is about the existence of this universe.

[@jontravolta2974]

This is a misunderstanding of what infinity means. There are infinite numbers between 1.0 and 2.0. Literally, could count for all of existence and never cross the threshold of reaching 2.0 as you count the decimals in between. Its possible "Life/Consciousness" exists, in that scenario, at number "4.0". Infinity does not mean all possibilities will eventually be realized. There are infinite numbers between every number. You could have a universe that encompasses the "infinite" between 1.0 and 2.0; and it never reaches the infinite of "4.0-4.1", where consciousness could be created. Infinity does NOT mean every possible permutation of infinity is ever achieved. Its much more restrictive than you would think.

[@besamelanalga]

@@jontravolta2974 thus above infinity is the box we live in. The box was created.

[@kennethsnyder9236]

My opinion is the universe we know is not the only one in our space and time. Multiple singularities existed before our universe existence.

[@seanhewitt603]

I agree in principle with Sir Roger, in that the universe is continually expanding, but I see it as happening in similar fashion to nuclear chain reactions. That is to say, radioactive isotopic atoms seldom happen alone in nature, there are always more scattered around the same general area. The same must be true for the primordial singularity which led to " the big bang". Eventually a stray "neutron" (galaxy) is going to approach a massive blackhole at just the right angle to "split the atom" ( cause a big bang)...

[@mevenstien]

Did he just say when the protons reach infinity? I think this may be why dictionaries were invented, maybe. Okay, you calculate the exact last digit of PI and then Get back to me, big guy.

[@javadhashtroudian5740]

Thanks. Excellent video. Intuitively I have always disliked a non-cyclical universe. This idea agreasxwith all we know at this time and yet has no beginning.

[@ejkalegal3145]

Intuition has nothing to do with it 😆

[@harshadk4264]

Mr.Penrose read the Upanishads to get the ideas.

[@rhondam2571]

I don't know much except what feels right....and this feels correct to me. And if so.....then it just makes sense that every eon continually repeats itself! It has to! Hense, "eternal life" as the Bible says! Also,..... As we've ALL heard ...." Everything is exactly as it's supposed to be at this moment." 💥

[@naalsocomment9449]

how comes that in the example in this video it is said the photons travel from the source to another point 'instantanious' but the light (photons) from sun to earth need 8 minutes? Does this math only work with flashlights?

[@JhondTorstenson]

Google "double slit experiment".....

[@TIFO39]

Chapter 51 Verse 47 :”And the sky we constructed with hands, and indeed, we are the expander.”

[@mitseraffej5812]

2:04 “ If we trace back the entire universe was once contained in a singularity “ This idea makes sense only if the universe is of a finite size. So yeah the finite observable universe may have once been a point of zero volume and infinite density. But if the universe in its entirety is of infinite size, it must alway have been of infinite size even if and when it was if infinite density. Infinities certainly screw with mathematics.

[@oldmech619]

Infinite universe = infinite mass = Infinite gravity (start of inflation) = infinite time = the beginning of the universe was an Infinite long time ago.

[@mitseraffej5812]

@@oldmech619 Yep, and once this life is over I guess I will be dead for the rest of infinite time. Boo hoo.😢 Life is but a hiccup of consciousness between oblivions

[@oldmech619]

@@mitseraffej5812 Well put. 👏👏

[@larrygilbertreyes2258]

People people !!! GOD IS INFINITE !!!!

[@brucknerian9664]

So what's your point?

[@victormera-b2v]

If it was soo dense and compact should it not have been a super blackhole?? If soo why no big or small bang from giant black holes

[@festo8885]

It was an ultra gigantico black hole, billions times bigger

[@sprague814]

There probably is.... The other side of the black hole could just be s******* out different universes continually and they think that they're all alone and that there's no God and that we don't exist that we couldn't exist it's impossible lol

[@oANIMUSoTube]

i hate to say that you, as i scroll down, are the first to ask a relevant question. Look, a black hole is formed when enough matter coalesces to create gravity strong enough, to pull in the medium we call space (?), which light moves through, faster than light can travel through it. I would suggest checking out "lensing effeect" to understand this better. Please don't think I think you ignorant, I only will say things like this in case you, OR others reading this don't know. So please don't read me as being condescending. I would say don't think of a blackhole as you might conceive a wormhole. it's a mass that you would be smeared upon entering the event horizon. you would NOT be travelling to some other place beyond it. i would say it is your final resting place in both time/space. exspansion is not forever, if nothing else because their "x amount of energy" is finite. However i ran a simulation based upon one other factor. my simulation was based on the beginning energy not being finite. Mine was based on the idea that the energy came from an infinite source, like knocking off a cap to a fire hydrant! it burst forth at maximum frequency, and continued to a point where matter iself ultimately painted the emission point into the center of the room. An ultimate blackhole engulfed it where you'd think it would all eventually end in contraction, but a neat little surprise ended up making "at the least plausible" a kind of loop keeping it going. HINT, "Hawking", galactic center quasar pulling in matter and simultaneous ejections of matter continuing the spreading of energy/mattter {like an electron reappearing after another disappeared.} somehow the energy is preserved?. I don't understand How. The AI came to this conclusion, but I found it fascinating.

[@victormera-b2v]

@@oANIMUSoTube 👍🏻

[@DeecentAnimal]

As we all aware

[@yunusjhon651]

Out of Universe and human bodies is Infinite space,the light particle of softness,the imperceptible image of Creator who is the one uncreated and exist eternally.

[@CalvinHale-k2c]

We are in 1 big bang among billions and that's why we will always find something outside of our universe because it's only one part of billions of parts in what is really the universe

[@youtubetv5762]

Excellent video, so good I had to go back and watch the second time!

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@youtubetv5762]

@@ck58npj72 oh I am….I’m born again Christian Jesus saves! Jesus is my savior! But I think there’s many things that we don’t know, even with the Bible certain things that God didn’t explain to us, God created science so I am grateful for the scientist….not all lol medical doctors again not all, 😊

[@chandlerclary3582]

Destruction comes naturally in the universe, but we have the ability to think about our actions!

[@Thothianthot]

The bang happened all.around so what we see beyond the bang point is moving the other way .... Every galaxy also has a bang point as our universe has a central bang point or creation-point. Just as there are energy holes to keep things balanced in the various regions to keep an expansive constant and a framework that is predictable in itself regulation. The universe is alive...Inhale exhale!

[@garypugh1153]

Cosmic web of galaxies extend into infinity and has always been in existance. Galaxies form and unform over and over and over forever. No big bang, no beginning. No end, no god creation. Our " tiny region" of galaxies can be expanding, but just into other "region" of endless infinity. 😊

[@stevew278]

I hope you find God in your life

[@blackfish4147]

Prove a single thing you say and there's a million bucks and a medal waiting for you in Sweden.

[@bassmanjr100]

An infinite universe or and infinite past is unscientific and completely illogical. Other than that it makes sense. It is far more likely that we do not have an accurate accounting of the red shift and how that relates to age (whatever that even means when something is that far away and moving away from us) and how the expansion took place.

[@bloodymary8540]

You are so wrong Gary

[@lukasbrown1834]

I always fall asleep to this stuff thought I was the only 1

[@greghelton4668]

Math at our current level of understanding is most likely an approximation of what actually happens. Singularities, infinity, the concept of of zero could be approximations of what happens at a limit. We have so much left to know it may never happen.

[@karifishc3376]

Singularity is THE home. Each person has its singularity Home!

[@ThothsDaughter1]

Excellent! Well done!

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Thank you! Cheers!

[@SHAUNMELOY]

I imagined how galaxy's got to be where they are now, just like every other idea, maybe they are there own big bangs

[@larryhammer5926]

creation is a loop! Creators are going further & further into the distant past & filling emptiness by turning it into space & filling it with creation! Sincerely the senior foundation creator! Note: I am not Larry!

[@jimbstars]

6:15 That ol coot Roger Penrose oughta know what he’s talking about cuz he’s so old he WAS there at the big bang! 😅

[@f0xygem]

Why did you make Rodger Penrose look like Grandpa Munster? Asking for a friend.

[@vikasjaipuria]

Indian philosophy has been teaching this since its ancient most scriptures! What the west calls experimental philosophy, Indians have been knowing this through ages

[@schmetterling4477]

And yet, you can quote a single verse. ;-)

[@danielpallin]

I like this allot

[@apoc5412]

What I'd like to know is -> is universe expanding in some direction faster than some other direction, or is the expanding equal in every direction?

[@vebnew]

Ecclesiastes 3:15 KJV, If you have questions see James 1:5 KJV - - - enough said!

[@kilnmaster]

Amen

[@Murcans-worship-felons]

I think it always existed, and always will.

[@garyburchgb]

That's the type of video I need to fall asleep to over Google years to fully take in what was explained.

[@許右甫]

宇宙是由空間與能量兩者共同構成的，最初的宇宙是宇宙零度（地球溫度下10^22°C)的母宇宙，在此低溫下只需10^-27焦耳的能量就可以凝結成一顆光粒子質量的能質粒子，因為是自然產生的所以每顆能質粒子的能階都有所差異，在過飽和狀態下能質粒子間以能階差大的優先結合成無動能、無距離與密度無限大的粒子個體，這就是黑洞的最小單位，粒子個體間也以能階差形成了相對運動，這就是引力的起源，粒子個體間的相對運動最終以踫撞融合長大結束，在融合時動能轉化為熱能提升合體後的能階，所以黑洞體積越大其體內的能階越高，當黑洞體內的能階超過內聚力就會自爆，所以黑洞的體積是有極限的（估計有銀河系的大小，引力達50億光年），而自爆所釋放出來的能量也都差異不大，由此推得在母宇宙他處以黑洞自爆形成的子宇宙，其演化過程與本宇宙差異不大。 現在以黑洞長大到自爆其所需的時間與空間對比黑洞自爆所產生的高能量到能量消失的空間與時間，其比值可能只有百萬分之一，因此在子宇宙中再發生黑洞自爆的機率近乎為零，而兩個子宇宙同時並存於母宇宙中是可以的，但彼此相距應當有萬個本宇宙的空間，所以重疊宇宙與平行宇宙概念我是覺得不可能，但子宇宙的高能量空間是佔據低能量母宇宙中的一小部分空間，兩個高低能量空間同時存在才能有質能轉換等冷熱混合形成了各式變化，物質星球才得以誕生。

[@Tapepusher]

word 🤜🤛

[@SATERIYA-dp3wb]

👍🏼 absolutely right by mega inches 👍🏼 big bang would be like 100 tadpoles of great mustard black hole, packed together to generate an unknown number of nuclear table or out of the normal earth alchemist table's so to say, we hv a god like alchemist table only a god have known best it's not impossible to research but the chances are there 👍🏼 just the that, if we the best present time tech of all time, we merely accomplished to control the best uranium, let alone some unknown nuclear number that exist in dark hole nor a dense big bang 👍🏼

[@richardturner2455]

I always guestioned the Big Bang, from the start. Years later to learn there's no sound in space. Can it simply be an unraveling?

[@tommartens3731]

My theory is that “The Big Bang” was from a star so big it would fill half our Galaxy. It ran out of fuel, went supernova and viola, “our” Galaxy was born.

[@fransiskusentymaras9986]

Sounds phonetically close to the Floresian's Dialect: Bike= Break; Beng= Separation. Bike Beng means " Separation in either Place, or Space that was caused by certain Breaking". And this can also be applied, I think, in terms of the Universe. There were No any Dispersal entities like today's forms of universe, only there were That Single Cosmos and only a few Giant Stars. Thank you

[@UnscheduledProgram]

Non locality blows this all away. Superposition renders space and time meaningless. Its all one thingy. Relativity is a mental construct and a consequence of consciousness. Our sense of self creates a stubborn duality that is subjective. The world inside your head vs the world outside your head. Can't have relativity if there is no separation or duality. In order to have relativity one needs a partner. If there is no partner, then what are you relative too? The fact of the matter is we are not separate and apart of the reality we are made of and swim in. But your mind is certain you have a location separate and apart of the reality you are. All dualities & symmetry are suspect. Something & Nothing. Hot & Cold. Good & Evil. Everywhere & Nowhere. Light & Darkness. Life & Death. Enjoy the illusion of self while it lasts. Ashes to Ashes. Dust to Dust. I don't think Rodger explained how a expanding universe re-collapsed into a new epoch. Or perhaps I missed it in his word salad.

[@ZeldaZonk-zt8fr]

Funk to funky.

[@BlizzPort]

1. Creator argument is easily countered by the fact it creates a never-ending loop. If the universe needs a creator, then the creator needs one too, hence the loop. And if creator doesn't need a creator, then neither does the universe, hence no need for creator. Further basing this idea on a man-made house example doesn't work. Universe in no way resembles a man-made structure, but rather a natural structure like a Giant Causeway. Geometric true, but random in its nature. Nothing about the house or clock is random. 2. The argument that complex stuff can't emerge by chance is easily countered by the fact you mentioned in your video. Given enough time, every single microscopic combination imaginable can emerge by chance. For example getting a self replicating nanobe to emerge by chance on some planet in the observable universe is pretty likely given enough time. And once you have this, complex life evolves pretty rapidly on cosmic timeframe causing all sort of emergence. 3. The universe might not be as special as we think it is. It could be just a grain of sand in a far larger web, where most are completely empty or chaotic. Ours is habitable because we can't emerge in any other. Or it's the only one, but most cycles are chaotic and we can emerge only in the habitable ones. This is called weak anthropic principle. 4. I'm not saying there is no god, just that these are not very good arguments for existence of god. The most compelling argument for god is that the universe is in the process of becoming self conscious, which by all means would make it a god of all, and of course if time is just another dimension such god is already present. But this isn't appealing to religions, because it's conditional on a set of scientific assumptions that can easily turn to be untrue.

[@bahaar2825]

Even with all this knowledge we still die and stop existing. If we can focus our time and energy in mastering and spreading the knowledge of love, then life is truly worth living.🙂

[@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC]

You nailed it bro. But I'm not sure I understand the self conscious universe god idea. Could you explain @@BlizzPort

[@BlizzPort]

@@ashleyobrien4937 Question is, why are you so convinced it's impossible? We are parts of the universe that have become conscious. You can easily expand on that, unless you're completely devoid of imagination..

[@xx3868]

I dissagree with you but not for reason you would think. I am a totally scientific Atheist and believe that Gods (1200 approx) are made up my man from fear and for control (works well!!) haha .You mention the argument that a God would need its own start or creator but if they were actually real, then they make everything so to our limited brain capacity, they dont have beginning as they make and are the beginning just as the BB cant have time before the start of time/space. Personally a god is problematic as counter to what i just said, a God is actually real in some way and tangible, WOULD have to have a sort of explanation and THUS like you say a backstory? So your argument and mine are 50/50 split? Of course, our universe or section of it ? could have been created by super advanced alien (s) almost same abilities of a what a God as we understand could do. Man is already gettign close to AI, Cloning humans (complex) and working on bending space so to avoid max speed limits of light speed in real time space. So the latest JWT and others are finding wrong age galaxies and also questioning if it was a BB start and not a sort of continuation of sorts which i always lent towards. I think ours is current on or parallel with others just as stars and planets are made so plentiful and killed too by their suns and roving back holes we have found now. BB may have to rewritten a bit but ideas of slavery gods and 6000 year old earths are long gone and creation is at same level as flat earth believers and as a pilot, earth is very ROUND and pain to navigate sometimes. Nothing is in stone and what you have could easily at least in part be the real facts. A god would be definition have to ALL everything OR it would need its own time going back . God would have to be a BB stand alone with no anything and that is not only very hard for many to get their head around but it goes very deep into physics and problems that cause problems as we understand how the universe works , but my explanation on that would take a while and gets really messy in the logic so one science vs 10,000 faiths all different is enough to make the point i think.. I honestly dont know if you or me or someone else is right and it may be much more difficult to quantify so simply..

[@ryanbrunson5764]

Before the big bang GOD

[@goldenbear8696]

If human beings are replaced by robots (let’s call them AI) as we probably will be in a relatively short time -universewise- what happens to god. It won’t have much to laugh at then.

[@bjarterundereim3038]

Isn't it obvious? The Cosmos is endless. It will probably have room for an endless number of BigBangs in any corner of the cornerless endlessness. Who said that our Cosmos is all there is, or the only one? Get a grip!! All older knowledge until now is mostly obsolete. Who says NOW We know it all???

[@shanedangers]

Great content/video! Subbed. This is basically "what came first, the chicken or the egg"?, but with space and time.

[@subcitizen2012]

Wow. Very good video presentation.

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Glad you liked it!

[@ornulusoundeffects6423]

Amazing effort! Amazing information! Love your video!

[@BeeyondIdeas]

Glad you liked it!

[@jackbones8920]

I had the exact same thought about eons and that our universe will at some point become the starting point of a new universe or something completely different.

[@oldmech619]

At the beginning, the universe was not a tiny ball or singularity. Time and space only existed “inside”. There is no “outside”. Much like we are today, there is us “inside” the universe. You can never look at the universe from the “outside”

[@Wtf-eva]

For all we really know we are stretching and squashing or vice versa and don’t notice it either. If everything was shrinking in the universe it would appear that it was expanding and everything was getting further from everything else. To me it seems either space is linked with time enough that as time passes, it drags space with it causing its expansion, or all visible matter is shrinking. I think things shrinking is simpler than space expanding but with all that we don’t understand about the quantum world, simpler may not be the truth.

[@Benspooky]

They can't just guess they have to go on what they know at the time until new information and technology get better. we learn more, and it never ends. If it's not open to change, is the issue

[@mevenstien]

It may seem as if I'm picky but actually do enjoy watch the videos, thank you. Just didn't want to be misunderstood.

[@letucke]

Yes, let's reconsider our understanding of how the Universe began. Oh, the Universe and everything in it was created by an entity outside of time and space. Some call that entity God. Some may only admit there is a higher power. Call it what you may, but it is one possibility!

[@sparXKuijper]

15:39 Not crazy at all . I proposed just such a thing and sent it to Stephen Hawking's office back in the late 90's, after HE said it was ridiculous to think "Before the Big Bang" !! ...Such Hubris 😆😃

[@fjmugwump]

The Divine Spirit of God The Creator of All That Is revealed that “It” is not the first Creator and we are not living in the first Universe. There have been previous Creators and previous Universes and there will be future ones. This process has been going on forever and will continue forever. No beginning and no end. Space is boundless and it expands to accommodate each new Universe. The James Webb Space Telescope is detecting remnants of previous Universes! 👍

[@robognome]

Even our greatest minds are like blind men trying to describe an elephant. Each of these great minds see only a part of a greater truth that is unfortunately too subtle and too far removed from what our senses can perceive. They are effectively trying to understand the nature of reality. None are able to comprehend the whole.

[@zwerver6249]

Only 1 can, the creator

[@vikrantbagwe5834]

There is No God

[@adamstotsky2216]

Perhaps the singularity only looks like a point because in reality we’re looking into infinity

[@marktorch9079]

Singularity is a term usually describing what drives a blackhole, When it's used to describe to explain the beginning of the Universe, we still talking about the same type of object?

[@ACMichler]

Black hole is high entropy and big bang is low entropy.

[@krakraichbinda]

Each process in the universe is in a cycle. So the universe itself is a cycle.

[@oldmech619]

The universe does not care what you or I think. Unless you have something to back up your guess, then nothing.

[@krakraichbinda]

@@oldmech619 As a coder I'd say: we're just an instance of the universe. 🤣🤣🤣

[@HaiderAli-l5z1c]

I theorised this, 16:00 , a cycle of big bangs because as the expansion happens and u end up with nothing then because of quantum fluctuations u get infinite energies in infinitely small amounts of time existing and then something causes it become into space time and u get another big bang. I thought of this year's ago because what was b4 the big bang and what the hell are we expanding into? What is this stuff the universe is expanding into? This also effects the so called dark matter.

[@zwerver6249]

Haydar Ali, it was Him. So of course we can’t find answers.

[@JamesBlake-i1l]

This universe is only the exit emissions of the mother of all black holes🎉🎉

[@DavidMedina-lu1wf]

I heard this already, a 16B year old rogue planet on our 13.8B y.o galaxy, my theory is that we were in a massive super super nova, just how we've observe stars blow up in a smaller scale

[@sciencefirst7880]

So.... in the multiverse, we live forever?🤔

[@CS.AtheistChannel.VoteBidenAOC]

There is no YOU, beyond you. That other... thing... Is a dice roll. But so are you.

[@davidsricker2338]

Another thing is dose the higgs boson have consciousness ? What dision is made to slow down matter ? If subatomic particles seem to react to observation causing the wave function to collapse. Then one must ask if conscious in fact seems active with other particles.

[@gbalcombe]

Could black holes be lenses which reflect matter in such a way that we can only see it from certain angles and distances? Is it possible that nothing is inside a black hole, and everything exists on the surface of it, like a bubble?

[@UnscheduledProgram]

Penrose > "fast forward time to infinity" . Last I checked infinity has no end. Hence, infinity. So , "fast forward time to infinity" is blah blah blah. There is no "to". There is no half way or middle of infinity. There is no beginning. Measuring the immeasurable is missing the point of the meaning of immeasurable. Pure vanity.

[@cryptobeehive]

Great Video, One last question is "Has Forever already existed ?'. ...

[@shaunmitchell2069]

I like to believe in a cyclic universe,I like this idea. I think it is not just cycles but cycles of ever increasing complexity,would that idea fit into this hypothesis?

[@LordJove312]

17:15 reincarnation

[@TheLeonhamm]

And quite simply (in so far as Thomistic Aristotleanism is concerned) this means what we determine to 'be' the universe existed, as 'the universe', before the 'universe' - that is the one we now perceive (as we observe it). Which is, philosophically speaking, a rational supposition if, of necessity, a more or less undemonstrable one in the manner of our current capacity to observe 'stuff' in action (as it 'is' not only as we understand 'it' .. whatever it is). In short, the 'Word' aka logic or principle e.g. 'universe' i.e. the one term covering all material stuff (observed or supposed) basically holds true - with or without only one more or less arbitrarily specified starting point (among many points and pointers in general) = whether with 'a' big bang or through a 'series' of whimpers. The bang or whimper format of the 'term' (universe) - or some other notional form of starting point - requires 'some .. thing' prior to the material being considered in simmer, spew or stasis. And that is .. principle or logos, even if we do not like to call it logic. Science can be fun! Yey! ;o)

[@edwardbeksinski5810]

Penrose said his model predicts 99.98 percent accuracy of his model and you guys just lap it up. Lmao

[@JohnDoe-rq5bz]

And here you are offering no alternatives to his theory. Do everyone a favor and keep your head out of Sabiana's legs.

[@nareshlathia5334]

The present Universe is 84th. Remains of previous Universes say this.

[@stephenzhao5809]

10:07 ... 15:35 ❤👍 RP: Our big bang was the result of the remote future 【I would love to match twin primes with CCC, i.e. occurrence of inflationary big bang (IBB) is just like distribution of twin prime pairs distribution. Accordingly, we've got the result of Dirac sea is made up from 40% and dark energy 60% from the two IBBs 】 of an eon prior to ours now that's a crazy idea but this idea is crazy and often we find that ideas seem crazy turn out actaully to be right so the idea The Hope here is that this crazy idea does turn out to be right. 15:52

[@Suraknar]

A simpler explanation is that the Universe is older, in that the big bang happened earlier than we think(longer than 13.8 billion years ago), and as such we can observer galaxies where they should not exist because in reality they had much more time to evolve to the observed levels.