This Video DISMANTLES The Big Bang Theory

Is the scientific evidence for the Big Bang really overwhelming? Does the Big Bang fit in Genesis 1? How old is the universe really? Join Dr. Terry Mortenson for the answers to these questions and more!
GET MORE ANSWERS: bit.ly/2K9I1Go
RESOURCES:
"Is the Big Bang Biblical?" by Dr. John H. Whitmore: bit.ly/2tuzTpV
"Answers Academy: Big Bang" featuring Dr. Jason Lisle: bit.ly/2lnwRA1
"The Heavens Declare: Challenges to the Big Bang" featuring Dr. Don DeYoung, Dr. Danny R. Faulkner, Dr. Russ Humpreys, Dr. Jason Lisle, and Spike Psarris: bit.ly/2M785j3

[@slaphappyone8001]

I seen a bumper sticker several years ago and I really liked it and repeat it. It said, "I believe in the big bang theory. God spoke and bang it was!"

[@usfanlovesminho5085]

Amen!

[@PortmanRd]

Billions of years ago.

[@Acularis]

@@PortmanRd roughly 6000*

[@Woopor]

@@Acularis6000 years ago was barely before the Egyptians started existing

[@Xercaii]

@@WooporGod created this earth with inbuilt age

[@Skashoon]

The good thing is that I used to believe what I had been taught in school, about the creation of the universe, evolution and it had me convinced that God didn’t exist. But now I realize the truth, that God created everything, seen and unseen. It took be just about 65 years to be set free from the distorted views that I had been taught and I praise God for His grace, patience, love and forgiveness. The realization that God created science and man’s ability to even question His existence is all the more reason to believe in the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. Hallelujah!

[@zanegib169]

Amen 🙏🏻 🙌🏻 Praise be to Him

[@841577]

I’m right there with you! My story is very similar.

[@robindew9072]

Hallelujah

[@tomislavzagreb8009]

I had a mixture of beliefs. I believed God initiated the Big bang, God started the evolution. Actually I didn't think the exact mechanism how everything came into existence was important. Since He is almighty He could do it any way He wanted to. But a couple of years back, I started encountering content (in my language) similar to this, where they were explaining why biblical description is exact (most of that content is no longer online) and why the fact that God created us directly, not that we evolved from apes is important. It really confused me and forced me to rethink all of my beliefs. Recently I found this channel and so far I am really satisfied with how here things are explained in an easy to understand manner (I'm not a scientist so it's really hard to debate someone who can use fancy words and quote some articles).

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Maybe you could figure out a way to accept the facts of nature, such as biological evolution, and incorporate those facts into your belief system? I don't know, of course :-)

[@diego8846]

It would be Fantastic to have these videos dubbed in Spanish!!! There are a lot of people here in Latin America that need this information, thank you!!

[@JB-yb4wn]

This isn't information, it is laughable and misrepresented science.

[@randomanun4278]

my favorite part of the entire ordeal is when scientists regard it wholly as a theory yet everyone who reads it and learns about it regards it as fact... despite overwhelming lack of evidence..

[@iampostal]

kinda like christianity!

[@randomanun4278]

@iampostal you seemed to have glossed over several key points of historical data that refute your point... don't worry, I'm not mad, and I won't disrespect you for it... I've become used to it happening. I'm sure you'll do a better job in the future.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@randomanun4278 don't forget that in the context of science, a *theory* is the highest level of explanation. A scientific theory is a carefully thought-out explanation for observations of the natural world that has been constructed using the scientific method, and which brings together many facts and hypotheses. Scientific theories can also incorporate scientific laws as well. Two major scientific discoveries provide strong support for the Big Bang theory: Hubble's discovery in the 1920s of a relationship between a galaxy's distance from Earth and its speed; and the discovery in the 1960s of cosmic microwave background radiation. There's other evidence as well based on our observations of the universe plus mathematics and physics. Also, remember that the Big Bang model does not describe the very *beginning* of our observable universe, it only describes what happened after. A Creator or God of some sort could have caused what we call the big bang to occur. The Big Bang did not go 'bang!'. It was not an explosion like a bomb detonating with matter flying out in all directions from a central point. It was also not 'everything from nothing'. The universe is still expanding to this day, an expansion that started with the big bang. The Big Bang is a fact to the best of our knowledge, it is the accepted cosmological model based on all the relevant data and evidence. There are many unknowns, of course, as there are with all scientific theories, and there is much we do not know about the Big Bang, but evidence indicates it is a fairly accurate model. Hope that helps 👍

[@Yamyatos]

You do realise a scientific theory is a model? The term is not used like you would use the term "theory" in everyday life. A scientific theory is the highest form any idea can reach in science. It explains all the known data and evidence without contradictions or competition. There is no standard higher than a theory in science. A model cant be "proven true" or "be a fact" since that makes no sense, but in everday terminology a scientific theory can be called a fact. It's as close to the use of the word as humans can get to truth. Electromagnetism is a theory. Germs are a theory. Cells are a theory. The big bang is a theory. Evolution is a theory. Plate tectonics are a theory. Abiogenesis or the inappropriately named string theory, are hypothesis. Those are also models, but they cannot account for all data, may include problems, may have unresolved competition, or have some other shortcomings, like being unable to make testable predictions. Or in other words, they are "ideas" that have yet to be fully fleshed out, and may not work out. Scientific models on the other hand, while not set in stone, rarely change in a meaningful way, as any new theory would have to explain the entire body of evidence the old theory explained, but be better. This usually results in new evidence making the model a bit more clear, a bit more powerful for predictions, but otherwise not change the explanation. Imagine it like a 1000 piece puzzle of which we got, say, 800 pieces put in place. A scientific theory wont ever be perfect, but any new piece we find will usually only make the overall picture clearer and wont cause it to completely change and turn out understanding of the topic around by 180°.

[@jamesbrice6619]

​@@therick363theory isn't fact

[@wdennis8]

I’ve never been more convinced that GOD, who always was, who always is and who always will be created everything for His pleasure. This is why we are here. Our purpose is to lovingly serve Him. Praise God.

[@jamesmylife6578]

Dang. God makin us suffer for his own pleasure. Fr ong messed up.

[@Sola_Scriptura_1.618]

@Jamesmylife , our suffering is not of God's doing but of Adam and Eve's sin!

[@Sola_Scriptura_1.618]

@Jamesmylife no, I am not pissed. I am happy to live a life and grateful for all that is good and bad and all that I have experienced. The alternative is unimaginable. Heaven is not for this world but the next!

[@92118]

Amen!!!

[@mcnuffin1208]

That sounds like the weirdest Stockholm syndrome I've ever heard

[@eymanbaird5847]

Almost every life begins with an egg. barnacles, corals, arachnids, old world snakes, alligators, except Darwin's children they came by stork when he was away for a year and half.

[@globalcoupledances]

You didn't mention plants. Are they not alive?

[@paulanelson9135]

Nothing can't make something. Period.

[@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060]

That isn't what the big bang theory claims.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Looking forward to Paula coming back and saying, 'oh, you were right, I did some research and now I know better. I like to learn new things, and I'm not afraid to be wrong'.. Oh, wait.. young Earth creationists don't do that. She had at least a month, and still probably never bothered to educate herself. Some people are allergic to knowledge.

[@paulanelson9135]

@@travisbicklepopsicle The earth is getting further from the moon every year. Do you get that ?

[@Dhoopstickles]

Our worlds and reality have always, and will always be what they are...including us. Our 'mental' or sensual world is a delusion. "Most will fall for the delusion and believe the lie." Amen.

[@davehamilton6104]

Well put together sir, God is amazing indeed.

[@Ocelot2009]

Yes!! I love God!! AMEN!! 😇😁

[@fredclarke801]

Well put together, by God.

[@frankie9259]

As someone who always found astrophysics fascinating, the older you get and the more you learn, the more you realize how little scientists actually know.We are brainwashed to believe in them not God

[@Davidutul]

Yes, scientists know little information in comparison with the whole information there is,but just because they don't know something now doesn't mean necessary that is "a cause of God". Something we don't know why it happens or how is neither a cause of magic, science or Godlike but a matter of "i don't know yet,but we will eventually find out,at first with theories than with experiments".

[@hawaiianwater1913]

As a christian, I'm really stuck in between this line between science and faith, I really do believe god created the universe, but at the same time, it makes sense why scientists think the big bang happened

[@adelinomorte7421]

frankie *** yes you are absolutely right, a great one in the greek antiquity once said "as much as I know only know that I know nathing". He said nothing about God, it means that knowing a lot or less has nothing to do with beliving or not in God. ***

[@stevepierce6467]

I am 75, and each day I learn more about geology, biology, and astrophysics and believe less and less in a supernatural deity.

[@technicianbis5250-ig1zd]

@@hawaiianwater1913 Explain why the Earth was created first. Read your Bible and stay true to God, time is nearly up.

[@clint8u]

Love how humans question existence - as we were created too … our God is so awesome !!!

[@user-rt9bj7zt2d]

Chapter 81 The Overthrowing - At-Takwir: Verse 1When the sun (with its spacious light) is folded up; 1 When the stars fall, losing their lustre;2 When the mountains vanish (like a mirage)3When the oceans boil over with a swell6When the world on High is unveiled;

[@reidveryan9414]

We applaud a painter for work of art, for we know it's a great skill and intelligence to make it. But any of the greatest paintings can be akin to a stick figure when compared to the wonders of the universe, yet we say it was one big accident followed by a series of lucky random chances.

[@terrymckenzie8786]

I feel so lucky to be born at this time to see and understand how the universe works.

[@reidveryan9414]

@@terrymckenzie8786 I don't think we've even scratched the surface

[@ZachPlaysChess]

@@reidveryan9414As Far as I Believe I Believe we will never know, I believe the Rapture will Happen before Atheists Attempt to move to Mars. And before Anyone Can find out anything more than what God has told us. I also believe at the End times, We Will Know Because we will be able to Ask the Creator Himself.

[@miscamisca6775]

". But any of the greatest paintings can be akin to a stick figure when compared to the wonders of the universe, " What other universe have you compared ours with to know that our universe was painted?

[@Caffin8tor]

Who eroded the river deltas? Does erosion require an intelligent eroder?

[@leavyriddlespur9036]

The Big Bang Theory, in my opinion, happened. Can you imagine how Gods voice reverberated throughout the universe, in all its silence, when He said; Let there be light?!?!!

[@bibledoctor7623]

Of course, there was no universe for His Voice to reverberate in...until He created it...not even EMPTINESS. Until we know Christ as Lord and Savior we truly cannot fathom 'everything' out of 'nothing'. In Christ's Love

[@prynsh_]

James web telescope says that there was a great light shining for so long before Creation

[@joekujoecuzpro8753]

​@@prynsh_ so you know when the creation happened.

[@fenton993]

The problem is the order of events portrayed in the biblical account vs Evolution account.

[@wobblyeyez]

​@@prynsh_wow a talking telescope!

[@ernestosarmiento1273]

Surprisingly, a catholic priest Fr. Georges Laimetre postulated the bigbag and finds no conflict with the creations of God.

[@technicianbis5250-ig1zd]

Except the Earth was created first and apart from the rest of the universe so no big bang happened.

[@axisofbeginning]

I am not a theologian, but I was raised as a Christian. Therefore, I accepted the Gospels as historical records. However, what the Genesis narrative tells us of the beginning aligns differently with what science teaches. So, as a result, I accepted the story of creation on faith. Later, as an adult, I read a popular science magazine article about the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) and how its data reveals that our Earth and solar system may be cosmically aligned. Then came the Planck satellite confirming the WMAP data. Could this be evidence that the book of Genesis is based on historical events? Perhaps, but unfortunately, I am not a scientist and can only understand about one percent of the science. Nevertheless, according to cosmologists, one thing is evident, the alignments somehow exist! Moreover, because the data does not fit the Standard Model of Cosmology, scientists dubbed it the Axis of Evil. But, as reported by Genesis, would these alignments be the Axis of Beginning? Did WMAP and the Planck satellites' data of the cosmic microwave background reveal a universe aligned with the Earth and solar system that may show Genesis as history? This may be why scientists are so silent concerning these alignments. And do these alignments support the Big Bang? Could this data be relative to a possible cosmic model of Intelligent Design? Instead of an Axis of Evil, what if these alignments show an actual Axis of Beginning?

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Why would you think scientists are silent concerning this issue? Very exciting and interesting; don't know why anyone would think scientists would be 'silent' on it. .?

[@joeosp1689]

Your story/book Axis of Beginning is extremely entertaining and informative.

[@JesusisKing1414]

@@travisbicklepopsicle because of the nature of our world… the fall of Adam and Eve as a result of original sin means we withdrew from our God :( which causes us to live in a world of the Prince of the power of the air who shields all from the truth

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@JesusisKing1414 genetics and anthropology demonstrate that modern humans first arose in Africa around 200,000 or so years ago. How does that square with the Adam and Eve story? Anyway, we know from biology that there are no, or were no, first two members of any species.

[@stunnedmulletblah9714]

Its not often you see a person working completely free of bias which you seem to have accomplished Well done

[@polymorpheus9745]

Question: Would you be able to determine if you exist within a finite universe that has a perfect mirror as the border and enacts a red shift by absorbing a minute amount of energy from light to maintain its border, or whether you exist within an infinitely expanding universe? I propose that if you see patterns showing a mirror of clusters of galaxies that appear older than those closer to you, you have your answer.

[@onegreenev]

I propose we are in an infinitely large universe. Why do we assume the universe is expanding vs we are just moving through it?

[@StephenJelinek]

Please share references that support the spinning ball. Genesis 1 Psalm 33:9, 93:1, 96:10 119:89-90 104:5, 1 chronicles 16:30 Isaiah 14:7, 45:18, Zechariah 1:11, Hebrews 11:10, 2 Peter 3:5.

[@ZachPlaysChess]

I propose that That method of Dating Is Unreliable Bc it’s built upon the Assumption that the Universe is already 13.8B years, so when they see the redshift, they think that it might be All Pushed outward bc of the Big Bang. People Argue that The Universe is by chance. But if the Universe is by chance then How does The Earth Hold life by chance? At the Perfect distance from the sun, And Why is it that there is over 100 things that the Earth Needs in order to Support Life? If even one of these things are absent then Earth would never be able to support life. You have The Atmosphere that’s made up Perfectly with what we need, And you have Jupiter Which Gets rid of Most of our Incoming Projectiles/Meteors. Also The Sun is the perfect size as well not to small not to big, not to Weak, not to strong, ; But by chance for Even the ones I mentioned is like Dropping 100M Toothpicks and having Them fall and make a Detailed House with an Interior. The chances of that are Pretty Slim I’d say, I don’t think anybody has ever seen it happen. Also if everything is by chance then how do you trust your Mind? If it’s by chance then doesn’t that mean it’s random Chemicals? Yeah that’s Designed I believe.

[@Minifliek]

@@onegreenev Why is it an assumption if it's measurable? Space is expanding period.

[@Minifliek]

@@StephenJelinek Your a creationist and a flerf?

[@user-rt9bj7zt2d]

And the sun runs [on course] toward its stopping point. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing. Surah Ya-Sin verse 38

[@mirandarogers3595]

1 Corinthians 15:1-4 Moreover, brethren, I declare unto you the gospel which I preached unto you, which also ye have received, and wherein ye stand; 2 By which also ye are saved, if ye keep in memory what I preached unto you, unless ye have believed in vain. 3 For I delivered unto you first of all that which I also received, how that Christ died for our sins according to the scriptures; 4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

[@rankalot]

"It's odd you'd have gas planets if all this was from a slowly spinning gas cloud"

[@bobjerk2492]

Right! So Boyle's Gas Law applies to the more massive Gas Giants but not the less massive rocky plantets. Sure.

[@adelinomorte7421]

***physics***

[@stlmopoet]

I remember when theists were ecstatic about the big bang theory because it was a point at which one could insert "and God created the heavens and the earth." The steady state theory it replaced just assumed everything in the universe had been around forever. No place for God at all. I am a Christian who is still happy there is a big bang theory. It's a point of intersection between science and belief.

[@adelinomorte7421]

stimopoet *** if people has only a simple mind they can not connect the big bang with God Eternal wich is the only one who can create the infinite where the big bang comes from. Many of us are lost in a big city even without a map. ***

[@us3rG]

The man made world is filled with lies

[@user-rt9bj7zt2d]

And the heaven We constructed with strength, and indeed, We are [its] expander. 47 surah Adh-Dhariyat 😍

[@ClementGreen]

Which scientist or scientists said that all matter in the universe came from nothing?

[@Rambo-iz4yw]

Stephen Hawkings - "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist" - But this is absolutely nonsense, where should the law of gravity come from, this presumes a law giver, who created this, it is mind blowing for me, how such a good scientist can say something like that.

[@ClementGreen]

@@Rambo-iz4yw But it is thought-provoking (obviously😉). Observable science. My interpretation of Hawking's reference to creation would be that the Universe - in the future - can and will create itself from nothing. The law of gravity means that everything will eventually collapse into a superdense form, like the nascent seed of a huge cosmic pomegranate, and then disappear from time, as time will also be devoured by Gravity. Nothing escapes it, not an apple nor an hour. There is no thing because Gravity devours everything. Then - and only then - can and will the university create itself from nothing, as our universe is currently expanding (the redshift). Therefore it must've come from nothing, because the word 'come' means move from then till now, and because an origin without time is nothing.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@Rambo-iz4yw "Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the universe exists, why we exist," Hawking writes. "It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the universe going." Yeah, you forgot that last line, don't worry, I fixed it for you.

[@Rambo-iz4yw]

and who is the sponatneous creator? for me it remains untterly non-sense, but thank you, I indeed have not read the whole text.@@JB-yb4wn

[@technicianbis5250-ig1zd]

@@Rambo-iz4yw Since gravity depends on matter which came first? Matter or gravity?

[@Chaosism]

The term "evolution" has a broad, general meaning of "change over time" that's used in common parlance and in casual description, but that term has very specific and diverse meanings with various scientific fields. For example, in biology it means _"The change in genetic composition of a population over successive generations, which may be caused by natural selection, inbreeding, hybridization, or mutation."_ Just because Evolutionary Theory and Big Bang Theory both entail "change over time", it does not mean they are therefore related or interdependent.

[@ganarzon]

What you quoted when you say on evolution "in biology it means 'The change in genetic composition of a population over successive generations, which may be caused by natural selection, inbreeding, hybridization, or mutation.'" is only what Charles Darwin made in his theory, not the very meaning of evolution in terms of Biology. What you have is your own mindset and interpretation that we don't follow or uphold. So this is your OWN bias definition and that is the problem! Your own definition isn't even scientific in the first place cos it goes against nature itself!

[@k-dogg9086]

If that's true then where are the mutations? If that statement where fact we'd have werewolves and the TMNT. We both know that this is pseudo cryptic nonsense.

[@k-dogg9086]

The only mutation I can think of is cancer, and that is destructive.

[@psycronizer]

@@k-dogg9086 OK, since you ask, and don't know, which means you are uneducated in the subject, let me enlighten you ! DNA replication is not perfect, sometimes it introduces errors, but, the cell has a kind of "proof reading" that can correct errors. and some times, this doesn't work either, and the mutation is permanent. Because of the massive number of base pair s it takes to make even a simple protein, many mutations actually have no noticeable effect, the ones that do, are usually ones that are located right at the active site of a protein, not some side bit that isn't critical to it's function, so, as you see, mutations happen all the time, and most of the time, there's simply no effect. Other things cause mutations, chemicals, ionizing radiation etc. Oh, and another thing, mutations are single point alterations in a code that is billions of letters long. Even something like the hemoglobin protein that carries oxygen in your blood is coded by a sequence that is millions and millions of base pairs long, so, one simple mutation can't possibly turn a wolf into a werewolf or something like that, that's absolutely absurd. So now, hopefully, you see how your lack of knowledge makes you come across, especially when you draw some pretty wild assumptions, from things you clearly know nothing about.

[@k-dogg9086]

@@psycronizer don't prove your evolution though. But I see your point. We are wonderfully and fearfully made by God the Creator! Who knit us together in our mother's womb.

[@vincentc.mercandetti9917]

He kept complaining that none of today's scientists were around to witness the origin of the solar system. So which theologians from today were around to witness Creation?

[@AbrahamRodriguez-vc8dt]

The record is the Bible... scientists are just assuming and guessing then second guessing and repeat.

[@Michiel_de_Jong]

@@AbrahamRodriguez-vc8dt | I do believe the Bible tells us *who* created everything and *why.* I don't think the Bible mend to inform us *how* it was done and *when* (apart from _"In_ _the_ _beginning"_ ). It's a relevant statement to note that theologians, nor scientists, (or humans in general for that matter,) weren't present to observe. That means scientists have to rely on current observations in order to try to reconstruct the past events. Just as the police does in case of a crime, in order to proof the past events beyond reasonable doubt. But science doesn't give an answer to the who and why questions. Theologians have to rely on revelations. In this case mainly from the book of Genesis. But, inspired as it may be, the human that wrote the book wasn't there either. And although the book answers the question of who and why, it's a stretch to squeeze answers out if it, about questions that weren't posed. In this respect, it might be better to compare the first chapters of Genesis with an other book from the Bible discussing time periods that haven't been observed: Revelations. No christian is expecting literally dragons to rise up out of the sea. They, rightly, interpreted this as a symbol, a representation for something. And very few christians think the described time periods in John's Revelations are to be taken literally.

[@AbrahamRodriguez-vc8dt]

@@Michiel_de_Jong I agree that no man was present during the beginning of everything. The Bible is God's Word, indeed a revelation. God want us to know who He is, as He long to have a personal relationship with us (His special creation). If all people can realized how magnificent His Word is, can you imagine how many hundreds years have passed from the time the book of Genesis is written to the time the Hebrews is written. And I quote Hebrews chapter 1 verses 1 & 2 "God, who at sundry times and in divers manners spake in time past unto the fathers by the prophets, Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;" reference this now to Genesis chapter 1. For me, it is amazing how the books of the Bible corelates with each other even though the time gap was hundreds of years. This signifies that God was declaring His Word to the writers of each book. So to answer your question. Yes, no man was present but the omnipotent, omniscient God actually told us WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW NOT WHAT WE WANT TO KNOW. The problem with today's society is that we want to know everything when we only have limited capacity. If you have faith to believe God is the Creator and we are the creation, then you should also believe that you are inferior in His superiority and is surrendered to His Lordship. If this is so, do we have a right to demand from our Creator. If a parent adopts an infant, it will not know that he is adopted unless the parent reveals it to him first. It is on the parent's perspective when he will reveal it or might not at all. The moment the parent reveal it to him, he may have many questions about his existence but one thing is for sure. Only the parent have the answers. This analogy of parent-child relationship is somewhat similar but also different to a certain level with God and His creation. We will never realized the God-creation relationship if we do not believe Him as One. And we are not a god and never will be even how much we want to be. And let us not take away the credit from our ancestors, their contributions good or bad should be accounted at the present not just thrown away by any generation who are JUST ASSUMING. New things are not always good or better and this is proven over time. Science is good until you use it in a wrong way like all things in life. This is a serious topic because our time is limited and there are eternal consequences for it. Will you bet your life on the hands of men? or will you have faith to God that is longing for your repentance through the redemption of Jesus Christ, His Word, His Son. Amen.

[@Michiel_de_Jong]

@@AbrahamRodriguez-vc8dt | I totally agree with your summary of the core message of the Bible, as you described it in the first paragraph, and I have also noted and appreciated the remarkable unity within the scripture, despite the fact that it has been written over the course of millennia. I even agree that science *might* has similarities with the ongoing effort of humans to build 'towers of Babel'. But there is an other aspect to it as well. When God placed humans on earth it was in a *garden,* while we are moving toward a *city* (Rev21). That's a development and humans are involved, receiving the instructions to multiply and to rule over the earth. ...and Adam immediately embarked on the first scientific mission: giving names to all the animals. As you said: God tells us what we need to know, but he hasn't told us everything; and Adam (pre-fall) started to fill in the gaps, with Gods permission, apparently, because he blessed Adam's discovery.... (Gen2:20). So, science is a calling, and to be honest,.. my admiration of Gods work isn't diminished by the discoveries in Geology, Astronomy, Physics, Biology. To the contrary; I am in awe, looking at rock formations and the story they tell us about the fast amounts of time it took them to form. I am not sure to whom you refer ("ancestors")..., but I have Augustine on my side;-)

[@vincentc.mercandetti9917]

@@AbrahamRodriguez-vc8dt How do you know the Bible is true and it's God's word. Did you speak to him about it? We're you there when God dictated it? Maybe the talking serpent wrote it - how can you prove he did not? Scientists have observation and evidence for their beliefs - what is yours? And please don't use the Bible to verify the Bible. That's classic circular reasoning.

[@user-rt9bj7zt2d]

Surah al-Anbiya 30. Do the unbelievers not see that the heavens and the earth were joined together, and We split them apart? And We made from water every living thing. Will they not believe?

[@user-mj5bl5dy1b]

Why should we. I choose not to believe. And no one no one can prove god. Because it's just a beleif

[@whirledpeas3477]

"The God Myth" Fixed it for ya.

[@evamofid7420]

Haha

[@technicianbis5250-ig1zd]

Myth?? Explain the Cambrian explosion.

[@bibledoctor7623]

Once you have been presented with the truth and you still choose to refute it for your own convenience, God calls that behavior being "wilingly ignorant" (2 Pet. 3:5).

[@abrahambaktiar2548]

Cyclic Universe is due to Roger Penrose (not Steinhardt !), he studied WMAP (or Planck) data that describes Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB).

[@MikeAnnunziato]

The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork. Day unto day utters speech, And night unto night reveals knowledge. Psalm 19:1-2

[@radioboyintj]

In the beginning God said Let there be light Sounds like the big bang to me

[@bibledoctor7623]

Nope. Because five days (litteral) later He formed man from the dust (literally 'smallest parts') of the earth. Furthermore, nothing died until Adam sinned. That's why the Sacrifice of Christ Jesus was planned BEFORE time itself. In Christ's Love

[@radioboyintj]

@@bibledoctor7623 The sacrifice of Christ was pre-planned but the universe is still billions of years old

[@bibledoctor7623]

@@radioboyintj It's not. Exodus 20 & Deuteronomy as well as Jesus Himself attest to that fact. In Christ's Love.

[@radioboyintj]

@@bibledoctor7623 The Buddhists believe The Universe is eternal Without beginning or end But this view is incompatible With the laws of physics and the behavior of the universe. Only the Bible affirms The finite age of the universe And agrees with science That the universe Was created in the recent past. The universe is 14 billion years old and this is incredibly young on a cosmic timescale as this means that the universe is only three times the age of the sun, Which is 4.6 Billion years. In contrast to the googol years yet to go. Science proves Creation

[@radioboyintj]

@@bibledoctor7623 Young Earth Creationism Makes a liar out of God Because it teaches that God deceives us regarding The behavior of the universe. The speed of light requires time, Therefore, you cannot say God sped up the light so we Can see the universe

[@donsaxon1948]

It's amazing to me that although the sun is millions of miles away from the moon, the moon looks the same size as the sun ..cannot be a coincidence

[@donsaxon1948]

@All About Britain Yes, there are slight fluctuations...all part of the plan

[@donsaxon1948]

@All About Britain yea we know

[@tangerinesarebetterthanora7060]

That's because the sun is 400 times bigger....

[@ceelt]

because the sun is incredibly huge...

[@eifnhoj345]

The bible says god Created the sun, the moon and the stars and placed them in the firmament.

[@melissasmomglam]

I’ve always thought when taught this in school “so that’s how God did it” 😂❤

[@expressoevangelism80]

I hope you get Sheldon Cooper along to one of your presentation sometime.

[@wetshlovesusa2898]

Amazing 🎉😮 Thank you!!

[@shivli6088]

Profound and powerful lecture Thank you so much Dr Terry Mortenson and God bless you and your family. Our GOD YHWH YESHUAH IS SO AMAZING ! HOW AWESOME IS HE!!! Thank You mighty King Jesus magnificent Father God for loving us so so much. We are not worthy of your grace. Bless You precious Father God

[@bluedragon1979]

Universe means; one phrase. That phrase is: "LET THERE BE...!" And then there was...

[@ryunova6128]

What? Is that a joke ? How much science you know?

[@thetoad7367]

And the Word was with God and the Word was God. Amen.

[@apocalypticraids]

@@thetoad7367 that's just bs

[@BIaZeDaSHeLL]

God did not create people......people created god

[@bluedragon1979]

@@BIaZeDaSHeLL you did not write this comment. This comment wrote itself and put your name on it.

[@emmanuelwesseh4848]

“The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.” They are corrupt, and their ways are vile; there is no one who does good. God looks down from heaven on all mankind to see if there are any who understand, any who seek God. Everyone has turned away, all have become corrupt; there is no one who does good, not even one.” ‭‭Psalms‬ ‭53‬:‭1‬-‭3‬ ‭

[@jayh8457]

Not convinced this guy is right but there are glaring problems with the current cosmological theories

[@ccronicc88]

There's really not they use a technique to distort the actual beliefs to try to make it look like it's not as solid as it is. Because they have no argument. Same is used in politics. If a politician has nothing going for him he just try to make his opponent look bad

[@andystokes8702]

Yes, that's one of the beauties of science, it never claims anything as absolute truth, it always leaves itself open to correction as new data becomes available. Whilst we can demonstrate pretty conclusively that the big bang did actually happen and we can date this event fairly accurately what we are currently unable to explain is why it happened, what caused it to occur. There is a distinct possibility that we may never be able to answer that question but at least science is looking at the problem and attempting to find the answer. Surely that is a more healthy approach than throwing our hands in the air, claiming God did it and refusing to look any further.

[@johnbarnhill386]

He’s wrong, there isn’t. At best there are minute inaccuracies.

[@ege9458]

You get caught up in a trap with your line of thinking about origins for the universe. Let me pose a question that is more pertinent to you and see how you look at things. Many scientists have pushed the concept of macro-evolution by Darwin's work in how "man" started on this earth and through text books distributed to public schools. Well, it has been a lie that was taught to impressionable children. Science itself disproves that "life" started on its own. Many scientists for years got away with assuming things. Now we realize the complexity, the design, the functionality behind many things and it has devastated macro-evolutionary understanding. The culture has been deceived by the false wisdom of man about many things.

[@summerd7668]

What evidence would you need to convince you?

[@barrymurphy6511]

As to your comment re: the Good Old Days... I'm 74 years old, so I resemble that remark! lol

[@doyouknoworjustbelieve6694]

This man is proof that evolution is NOT linear. His 21st century body is equipped with a 1st century brain, that was never upgraded.

[@Tartersauce101]

1st century brains were pretty amazing.

[@v.prestorpnrcrtlcrt2096]

I feel like I'm in Sunday school.

[@deecook8393]

They spew bullshit there, also.

[@davidcooper1201]

That is the great thing about Sunday School and messages from God's Word, God has told us how and why He created mankind and our glorious earth, sun, moon and stars and why he created man. It always feels good to be in Sunday school because one hears the truth from God's word, not nonsensical claims of atheists.

[@Ocelot2009]

@@davidcooper1201 A M E N

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@davidcooper1201 church and Sunday school are fine, of course :-).. but why is it necessary to misrepresent science, or think that science is an enemy or something? Or to think that science equals atheism? It was a Christian man who first proposed what we now call 'Big Bang Theory', anyway🙄 Edit: Big Bang Theory has nothing to do with atheism, and is based upon direct observations and measurements of our universe plus lots of mathematics and physics. Do we know everything about it? Of course not, that's the beauty of science, it's a learning process. Also, please keep in mind that the Big Bang model does not describe the very *beginning* of our universe, it only describes what occurred immediately after. A god or creator of some sort could have created the universe.

[@davidcooper1201]

@@travisbicklepopsicle Your Big Bang theory doesn't fit the facts. Good science is confirming the Word of God continually. Evolution is not science, it is rather a failed theory based upon humanism.

[@enrique88005]

I've never heard a scientist refer to the formation of galaxies and solar systems as evolutionary

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Yeah, it seems as if, to certain religious people, all of science is about evolution, 'evolutionists', and of course the worst, 'evolutionism'.

[@markaustin3299]

He literally gives an example of a textbook with cosmic evolution in the title lol... And there are many, many examples of the word and concept of evolution being applied to the cosmos by mainstream scientists.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@markaustin3299 of course :-) The word 'evolution' can be applied in many ways. Biological evolution is not the same as 'cosmic evolution', or the evolution of the cosmos, or whatever. Just like biological evolution is not the same as the evolution of the home computer, or the evolution of the Chevy Corvette, or.. I'm sure you understand :-) You also know that words can sometimes even have different meanings or definitions depending on the context. Just like the word, 'theory', for example. A *scientific theory* is practically the complete opposite of the colloquial usage of the word, 'theory'. Edit: 'mainstream science'?.. it is *science*. 'If it isn't science, it's pseudoscience. They are polar opposites. The ultimate mission of science is to discover facts about the physical universe, no matter how complicated, disheartening, or unexpected those facts may be. In contrast, the ultimate mission of pseudoscience is to reject physical facts in order to promote ideas that are not consistent with reality. Pseudoscience is inherently dishonest and deceptive because it claims the mantle of science while *rejecting scientific methods* and *contradicting* scientific facts.' -- National Center for Science Education Example: 'creation science' is pseudoscience.

[@lance5015]

Without science.. astrology stops fast.. and God said I made the milky way and dinosaurs.. nope. new chapters to the Bible stopped many moons ago.

[@kirkkirkland7244]

That's because they cannot explain how evolution actually happened to make the universe!!!

[@JMichael2x2]

I think we can all agree that based on natural science the universe and life should not exist - it’s an impossibility. The reason I have no problem accepting the creation story in the Bible is very simple. How long does it take to do the impossible? There is no time long enough to do the impossible, in fact time is an enemy. It requires miraculous intervention. Why couldn’t the Miracle Worker do it in 6 days?

[@trumpbellend6717]

Improbable things happen There is a difference between an event that "will never occur" and one that "has a zero probability of occurring." As an example of the fallacy of looking at results and conjecturing backwards on what the probability of such occurring was, grab a set of playing cards and deal them out face up, one at a time. When the first card is dealt, the probability of it being whatever it is, is 52-1, the probability of the second card being whatever it is is then 51-1, giving a combined probability of 2652-1. Once you have got through the deck, the probability of you having dealt those cards in that order is a staggering one in 8×(10) ⁶⁷ , which is pretty much "nearly zero", yet you just managed to do it! Congratulations, you're magic - just like Jesus

[@jimhughes1070]

Another perfectly workable logical solution... Excellent!

[@perplexity8260]

That argument has been refuted time and time again. What makes you immediately say that God must have created the universe? What if there is some unwritten law of the universe that makes universes form in this way? What if there are multiple universes, and one that supported life was bound to pop up sometime? Simply saying that you don’t know the answer to something and attributing it to God is fallacious. If someone said they didn’t know how a refrigerator worked and attributed then refrigerator’s ability to cool things to God, you’d hopefully think they were mad! I, and many other atheists, see no difference here.

[@onegreenev]

In the movie Contact they elude to space being an awful waste of space if there were no other intelligent life out there. I say. What if it takes all that wasted space out there for you to exist here? Everything has a purpose and place and everything is in its proper place. Without that balance life could not work. It was all designed and placed in perfection. So all that expanse is not wasted at all.

[@albertdepeal9658]

If cognition is simply achieved by the assembly of atoms and molecules, and all the atoms and molecules that give us cognition came from the stars, do stars have cognition?

[@kissmy_butt1302]

There are a couple of items glossed over in this video. 1) The Apollo and Soviet Luna missions showed the Earth and the Moon share the same chemical makeup which does add truth to the planetary collision theory. 2) China, Russia, European space agency and NASA have satellites in the moon mapping and measuring. There is a consensus that the back side of the moon's crust is a lot thicker than the side we see. The current theory is after the collision there was a ring of debrie that formed two moons. The small moon slowly caught up to the larger moon that solidified from the post collision disk. Eventually it merged into the larger moon. 3) The exo planet search has led to believe our solar system is more unique than ordinary. Most solar systems are binary. The rarer ones has trinay suns. About 1/4 of the found solar systems in our galaxy are uniary like our solar system. 4) A very large number of solar systems we have found in our galaxy show the large gas giants are closer in where Venus and the Earth are. They also have shown there are Earth and Super Earth size planets but they are farther out usually, between Mars and Jupiter's orbits. 5) The current theory is Earth is a 2nd or 3rd generation planet. In super computer models the most common theory that came out is Jupiter and Saturn started in closer and their gravitational relationship with each other and the sun forced their orbits out, pushing material out and in towards the sun. They believe there were more smaller planet and planetoids like we see in the Kiper belt today. The reason Pluto lost it's planet designation because they have found 300 objects of the same size in the Kiper Belt. Regardless if you are religious, spiritual, atheist, etc..... our existence is a paradox. If a human lived and infinite amount of time we may get to a 99.99% reasoning of why the universe and existence is here. We will never reach 100% understanding because we did not create it. This is why we have placeholders in words such as faith, infinite, etc.... We will never truly know. How can you define what we did not create? You can explain a pencil, a car, etc.... but you can't explain an atom, time, etc.... We can observe and learn but we do not 100% understand it all.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

You've brought up some interesting *facts* The sad thing is, many people viewing this vid don't care about facts. (Nice comment; thank you)

[@Samu-xc2tc]

Can you share with me all of your information sources, please? (Excuse me if my english don't be good)

[@justdoit9596]

​@@travisbicklepopsicle that is again not true he is just listing observations but only based on observations you cant look into the past a statement about the past is always based on assumptions and that's the point of this video it also doesn't mean that viewers from this video are uneducated I have a degree math and physics and I know facts and I am also sure that the host of the video knows the facts it is not about the facts or evidence the clash of the world view is based on assumptions well hidden or not hidden.. But I admit that the host messed up with the moon theories since he declared them as wrong based on assumptions. we will never find out the complete truth but it is wrong to deceive other's into thinking that origin science is 100% true. it is always a religion to some degree and it is up to us what religion we want to believe in. but I personally prefer a creation-theory but again it is based on assumptions and not any better or different from science-religion..

[@BillMurrey]

But you can know. To quote another person who posted here: "The realization that God created science and man’s ability to even question His existence is all the more reason to believe in the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit. Hallelujah!"

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@justdoit9596 right, that's true, science is not about being 100% correct about the past, or anything else. Everything in science is tentative. Scientists can learn a lot about the past though, using data and evidence, just as scientists do when they study the present. An example would be evolutionary biology, where scientists can look at evidence from the past, make predictions based on that, and then those predictions come to fruition in the present. Geologists can look at a big hole in the ground, that formed long, long ago, and determine whether it is a dried-up lake bed or a meteor impact crater. The past leaves evidence that can be studied by scientists in the present. Just because there are assumptions made in science, does not make science a religion, or a belief system. There are a lot more criteria necessary in order to call something a religion.

[@Scentobsessedemma]

Thank God for you wonderful people and your Christian apologetics educational content. I’m learning so much. I was a Christian who believed in the Big Bang and was even eventually indoctrinated into evolution theory. Merging my Christian beliefs with secular beliefs and thinking God was behind all of it. But now I’ve started reading the Bible properly and educating myself more and the truth is so plainly clear. I completely agree with you regarding observational science and evolution. There has never been a missing link found. And now that I’m reading the Bible and seeing the truth, it’s like I’m a new person. All of my old beliefs shattered in an instant. I also really liked your point about comets, that is so powerful! Anyway, thank you and God bless you all 🤗🙏🏼 (I do wish you opened up a museum in Australia).

[@ege9458]

Your testimony is a great witness to the truth of God. It is unfortunate that the public school systems of this world are so opposed to God and the Bible. It is amazing the insight, understanding and confidence we get from reading His Word and how we should look at the world. When I think of Australia, I think of many things like alligators, sharks, jellyfish, snakes, and some other unfriendly creatures. How is it from your perspective?

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

You may want to do a bit of research. 'Missing link' is not a scientific term, and plenty of intermediates have been discovered. Why would you make a false claim like that? There's no need to be frightened of science and what scientists discover.

[@HS-zk5nn]

likewise. for me, I was an atheist for all my life. until I realized that those I trusted the most could not provide any answers. not only could they not, they denigrated any those that questioned them. I knew then that those prevailing views supposedly rooted in science were a farce.

[@dougharding5231]

​@@travisbicklepopsicleno, you are mistaken. There are, in fact, zero fossils that show a transition from one species to another. And you need that in order to prove your evolution nonsense.

[@davidoakes3905]

History and Development of the Bible: The Bible is not a single book; it is a collection of books whose complex development is not completely understood. The oldest books began as songs and stories orally transmitted from generation to generation. Scholars are just beginning to explore "the interface between writing, performance, memorization, and the aural dimension" of the texts. Current indications are that the ancient writing-reading process was supplemented by memorization and oral performance in community. The Bible was written and compiled by many people, most of whom are unknown, from a variety of disparate cultures. It wasn't written by the hand of God. It was written by mere mortals.

[@cletisdolen2653]

This is from left field, but I had to listed and relisten to a segment around 1:01; he said "peanuts" but that's NOT what I thought he said. LOL

[@shibumathai77]

Wonderful just enjoyed it, the Word of God stands as it always does.

[@davemarleymusic9153]

The Word is Jesus, not the scriptures.

[@77WATERSTONE]

This guy explains didly squat!, Just anotherembrt of the god squad trying to prove science wrong by talking crap. He never mentions that whole Dinosaur skeletons have been found that natural history has been studied since time immemorial. There have been 5000 gods throughout history and only yours is real?? Give me a break!

[@ege9458]

@@davemarleymusic9153 You need to read 2 Timothy 3 :16......there are other verses too.

[@ghostcuzibotw5605]

Didn’t the babe say earth is flat and the center of the universe 😂

[@adamboyen4727]

Ok at 7:22 as someone who studies science at University under the tutelage of PHD scientists I can tell you know the whole concept of "operation science" and "origin science" is just a made up concept derived from creationists so they can claim that certain parts of modern science aren't science and other parts are, like a cherry picker, this isn't true and science itself isn't even about facts or theories, it's about the methodology, observation, hypothesis (testable and falsifiable), prediction (novel, testable and falsifiable), experimentation (repeatable and designed to falsify the hypothesis) then if you fail to falsify the hypothesis after numerous attempts you get a theory and this is how ALL science works, ultimately however theology doesn't work in this manner so you can see why theology isn't science, if anyone claims theology to be a science please describe your theology in terms of the scientific method

[@yvesgysel9834]

Adam, you are correct. I am an atheist myself. However the Big Bang is still a theory. Most accepted theory by science and makes a lot of sense, but it's still a theory.

[@Widdowson2020]

Except that science doesn’t respect observations that fall outside of its current dogma. Thus science itself has become a religion. Complete with its own heresies

[@adamboyen4727]

@@Widdowson2020 no science doesn't accept unfalsifiable concepts such as all powerful deities, the only way to get a Nobel prize is to falsify one of the current hypothesis, maybe instead of listening to these scientifically illiterate preachers you should start listening to a real scientist on the front And I almost forgot science also only accepts useful ideas not some useless concept such as a god, evolution on the other hand is used to determine the optimal breeding patterns of cattle and crops to maximise food output

[@adamboyen4727]

@@yvesgysel9834 firstly your using theory in the wrong context, a scientific theory is a body of knowledge with a large amount of supporting evidence, it is not by any means synonymous with hypothesis and secondly the big bang theory is just a collection of concepts and other theories put together to make a coherent hypothesis as to the origin of the universe, in by saying that there is sufficient evidence to suggest that some parts of the theory are true such as Stephen Hawkings suggestion that "nothing created nothing as there is still technically nothing", basically what he means is that there is no net amount of energy in the universe as measured by the WMAP satellite and so long as a system of 0 joules of energy creates particles moving in opposite directions with exactly the same amount of energy there is no 1st law of thermodynamics violation

[@christiskingforever7235]

Science confirms the Bible, it doesn’t discredit the Bible. Theories such as the Big Bang are just that, theories. They are nonsensical, foolish and an insult to God. Just as a painting has a painter, creation has a Creator. And it’s the Lord Jesus Christ. Nothing created everything???? 😂

[@jdub6909]

If Time dilation occurs as you approach the speed of light; why do we assume that space time is billions of years old and the distance between stars so great?

[@repelsteeltje310]

Well the good thing for these Christians here is if you're able to debunk any scientific theory. You'll win the Nobelprize with a million dollars attached...... So go for it.......

[@Punchbowl403]

As a Christian of over 70 decades, a keen reader of science, and having read the entire bible over 30 times, I believe that what we call the "Bib Bang" is the best understanding of the origin of our universe!

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

The only part of your comment I disagree with is your age.. 700 years is pretty old:-) 😊jk

[@frederickpile3599]

Rabbi mottel Baleston read the bible many times as an orthodox israelite. Now he is messianic. I 've studied astronomy since the age of 7 or 8 years old. Quantum physics/mecanics amazed me even more. Didn't last long. The Lord sent me an angel, then I started reading scriptures. I felt like, I just lost time studying science.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@frederickpile3599 it's a shame that you felt like you just lost time studying science. Great that everything else worked out, I'm just saying, you know.. you didn't really waste time though because you were interested in those areas of science that you studying, right? And you enjoyed learning about that stuff, right?.. it all works out because you were actually learning about what you believe god created, so you were studying god's work👍 Disclaimer: the above is merely my own opinion based upon how I think I would feel if I were in your shoes 😊

[@dougharding5231]

If that's true then you are forced to dismiss the first six chapters of Genesis as fairytales. You either believe the Bible or you don't, but you don't get to cherry pick what God gave us in His Word.

[@dubstepzsi]

Whhyyyyyyyyyyy i loved that TV series, 😅 sorry i couldn't resist 😊 this is actually interesting

[@piercelee9421]

🤣

[@nickbarton3191]

There is a disconnect in the Genesis account. The earth was void, then God made light, so there was night and day, the very first day. Day 3 there were plants and trees which is fine because there was already light. Then day 4 it says God set lights for seasons, and a great light to rule the day, and a lesser light to rule the night. But at least the greater light had already been created, else "days" wouldn't have existed nor plants and trees been able to grow. So what happened, did God add the moon in orbit and put the earth on a tilted axis to create seasons?

[@jerrythompson8337]

Q: If grants where done away with would they know the answer?

[@piercelee9421]

Could you restate

[@wefinishthisnow3883]

Firstly. Respect for allowing comments on this video. Secondly, I look forward to your peer-reviewed paper that DISMANTLES the BBT. Wait... you aren't going to write one? Why not? What are you afraid of?

[@chiararomano1818]

He and James tour are going to co-write a paper so they both expound upon all their deep thinky-thoughts.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@chiararomano1818 Oh that will be bigly! Can't wait for the colouring book to come out!

[@dynamic_pointer_cast]

Then some of the scribes and Pharisees said to Him, “Teacher, we want to see a sign from You.” 39 But He answered and said to them, “An evil and adulterous generation craves for a sign; and yet no sign will be given to it but the sign of Jonah the prophet; 40 for just as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the sea monster, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

[@lawee666]

JOB :38:4 to 7 plz read

[@dalelanger3355]

Did not see how you dismantled anything. Those who cannot understand seem to go to the supernatural for their own comfort. That is fine. Many others continue the search for real answers. Keep studying actual evidence. You may get there some day.

[@ncwdane]

When science points toward a neccessity for God, to get to the Real Answer, you may want to stop having the presupposition, that whatever the "real answer is, it must not include the existence of a supernatural God" - BTW objects don't make lifeforms, & finite matter can't be infinite" plus Matter/Energy TOTALS, REMAIN Constant, not even decreasing, much less increasing. Athiest are the science deniers, in order to believe by blind faith, their scenario(s) of a "no god" - jus'sayin ;-)

[@dougharding5231]

In our world and universe, we are totally surrounded by evidence. Scientists who are Christians study this evidence just as profoundly as secular scientists do; you're just probably unaware of it because it gets virtually no coverage. As I said, evidence is everywhere. It's how you interpret it that matters. If you're honest you'll admit that believing in big bang, evolution, and millions/billions of years takes a lot of "faith." To say otherwise would be foolish.

[@us3rG]

The human nature and the human brain are not just accident. Without the human brain everything is meaningless

[@us3rG]

The human nature and the human brain are not just accident. Without the human brain everything is meaningless

[@billjohnson9472]

at 30:30. he outlines what is not known. no conclusion can be drawn about any theory based on not knowing. that is the default answer if something is not known is not "god". you have to have the evidence of your claim, not evidence that other claims are incorrect.

[@BiologicalComputer]

Or at least rule out any other possible option. Impossible to do so when choosing to believe in whatever corporeal being aligns with your morals.

[@KC.801]

God of the gaps that keeps getting smaller

[@TLO129]

Exactly. “Unexplained” means unexplained. It doesn’t mean Is explained by god

[@billjohnson9472]

@@TLO129 if everything were known and explained thousands of research faculty in dozens of departments at universities around the world would suddenly be unemployed.

[@BiologicalComputer]

@@bubba6581 Of course. But if you think about a religion and take away the divine worship and quirks, its generally just stories promoting morals that align with that faith. I never really needed religion because I can decide for myself what is right or wrong. I do think religion can be very helpful for people feeling lost or unsure, but I don’t like when it is pushed on others or taken literally.

[@philipbuckley759]

one thing that may be needed is to define the term repent, and one repent, before believing....

[@shaccooper]

This is so powerful considering the recent info from JWST. It’s always best to stick with God. And you’re right. This is why I go with creationist over other camps that compromise on what’s true

[@sebastiannolte1201]

Why does "accepting the Big Bang theory" means that you don't stick with God anymore? You are aware that the Big Bang theory was mainly invented/promoted by a Christian theologist and priest? That it was critisized by some (probably atheist) scientists who thought, that it was biased towards religion, so that it is a theory that was made up by Christians who were looking for a theory that is compatible with their belief? However, why do you believe that the earth is a sphere, orbiting around the sun, which is also just one of billion stars in a giant universe? Christian Flat earthers will disagree and argues in the exact same way that you do. But interestingly you seem to accept certain scientific discoveries. But others not.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Uh-oh... You didn't watch one of those YT vids with a title like, 'James Webb Telescope proves Big Bang never happened!'.. and then not fact check that video, did you? There's an article at space com-- one of the astronomers who works with the James Webb Telescope explains how this little piece of false information began spreading around the web starting back in August, I think. The data that has been coming in from the James Webb has been awesome, but it certainly hasn't demonstrated the Big Bang model to be false. Allison Kirkpatrick is the astronomer I am referring to; Eric Lerner is the person who 'misconstrued' (I'm being nice..) her work and started this whole mess:-) Edit: if I'm misunderstanding your comment, I apologize

[@SeattleDinghyer]

Science questions answers. When it comes to religion, it questions the questioner. We may never know how we got here, or why, but at least science tries. Richard Feynman said it best: I don't fear the questions that can't be answered, I fear the answers that cannot be questioned.

[@dickmartn]

OK, so there was a big bang...Someone had to light the fuse...

[@basedgamerguy818]

Big bank is not an explosion

[@bobjerk2492]

Here's what the Bible has to say about a Big Bang: "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a GREAT NOISE, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up." -2 Peter 3:10, King James Bible

[@robnewsome2407]

Nope, nothing lit itself and created everything. You got to have some serious faith to believe that

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@robnewsome2407 it's always interesting to me watching young Earth creationists misrepresent science. I guess they're afraid to actually *learn* or something, I don't know. It's also puzzling to me.. they believe their position is 100% correct, and that science is not a threat to them, so why the need to misrepresent and lie about science all the time? There has to be fear involved somehow.

[@robnewsome2407]

@@travisbicklepopsicle the fear of God is the beggining of wisdom. Yes, there is a lot of reasons to fear science like nuclear weapons and AI, that's some scary stuff but at least I have hope in a better world. Science can be a god thing but it can also be very destructive as well and it's not always correct. The idea of a big bang coming from nothing is ludicrous. Every day it seems science has to question itself and comes up with a new theory and when that gets debunked as it inevitably always does, some genius creates something new out of his or her imagination in order to explain the impossible. I have nothing against science but it's used to try to dismiss and reject what is pretty obvious. That the world is far to complicated and organized to have just happened out of nothing. There has to be some kind of intelligent design. Imagine a 1000 years ago someone saw someone using their cell phone and asked where it came from and the answer they get is, " oh, it just made itself but it's taken billions of years". 😂😂😂 Would you believe that? Well life and the universe is a whole lot more complicated then a cell phone but this is what you believe rather then believe there has to be a creator. In a 1000 years, if the world's still here, their will be a completely different theory to explain the world but I'm sure it would be wrong too.

[@southsoundhomepros861]

Excellent!

[@theothertroll]

And yet the acts of man can neither save nor condemn him, for man was condemned from the beginning and Christ stated only the Father chooses who comes unto Christ 😳

[@mjhardiman1207]

Very good I enjoyed this video

[@frankmerolillo3880]

The Big Bang happened when God said let there be light. Is the creation wiser than the Creator. ???

[@carlomottola3213]

Genesis doesn't say the sun was created. It sais it was made. Two different verbs that cannot be interchanged.

[@Jeremy9697]

Made and created are literally synonyms........

[@carlomottola3213]

@@Jeremy9697 not synonyms. To make is synonymous to fabricate, you make something from something else, like a table from a tree. To create is an act of will. From nothing, something comes to exist, just like God created the heavens and the earth.

[@carlomottola3213]

Specifically to the Sun, he made it, or made it possible to be, from the gasses.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

It saddens me that so many people think that an apologetics organization has actually falsified ( sorry.. 'Dismantled'😳) *anything* having to do with *any* field of science. The real world doesn't work that way:-(

[@ncwdane]

The Science is E=Mc'sq. which backs up the factual SCIENCE that Energy/matter totals remain, the same, they don't even decrease, MUCH LESS INCREASE & that put along side, The SCIENCE FACT that Finite matter, CAN NOT Be infinite! pretty much shows scientifically the neccesity for God (who through scripture, explains that HE is NOT finite/created matter subject to Time, but rather spirit, which is outside the time realm all together! How would "mere sheep hearders, way back then, know that, that's the only scenario that solves scintific problems that get descovered in the future as problems for a "no god scenario" many OTHER Religions don't work, because their "gods" are finite matter in there doctrine, & usually not outside the time realm, So God has communicated to us, through HIS Word that is 100% accurate. jus-sayin'

[@lucianobaartman4678]

You have been brain washed to think that half of the things scientists believe in our day is science thts why. He havent listened to anything this man said. You will die soon and you will have to face God if you are wrong. To be smart is too be neutral at least. These big talkers are only whistling pass the grave about things no one really can answer but to make assumptions.

[@lucianobaartman4678]

Secondly, they resort to pure fiction as theories. Something cannot come into existance from nothing. There is no debate on that. I dont know why the creationists even permit further debate. The only other options is that matter is eternal or come from an unending string of events which is also just fictional imagination. Atheist have resorted to fiction as theories. Everyone knows that something cannot come from nothing but they exempt this when it comes to origins. How is that such smart people has become so stupid? Even the big bang itself cannot be replicated in a lab on a small scale as it needs fictional states of events to occur before and after it. The theory is laughable. Since when did people start excepting such rubbish as actual against all common sense? You become a fool when you reject God.

[@morardesign2647]

So magic didn’t do it 🤷‍♂️

[@MastaE2288]

It looks like someone didn't watch the video but still decided to comment.

[@garys1967]

Beautiful! Thank you 🤗

[@1sonjohn44]

Minus going to the moon (Van Allen Belt), this was a good episode.

[@chamberlainmiller2991]

I feel the car mechanic/manufacturer analogy is not a good reference for his argument. To be fair, I’m not sure whether there is a good one. Perhaps it would be better to use an analogy about an AI and the personality of its designer that contributed to how they became a designer?

[@camia2444]

Big Bang is in Genesis it’s all about the creation of almighty GOD! Scientist are just trying to take the glory that does not belong to them! To GOD be the Glory❤!

[@Lexi2019AURORA]

Actually scientists are trying to explain everything in a subjective unbiased manner that everyone can understand. Science does not rely on religious beliefs.

[@jimmiewomble416]

Funny how he demands evidence for science, but sees no problem with believing in religion based solely on faith.

[@MCJustJ420]

Not the same thing Science makes the claim that the evidence is there, religion is based on transcendentals, the proof exists in the abstract and can't be accessed physically, demanding evidence is foolish, but evidence is the basis for science, so its normal to demand evidence Science is suppose to be demonstrable, so making a scientific claim that can't be proven, is actually unscientific

[@martyfromnebraska1045]

@@MCJustJ420 No, lol. The transcendentals themselves are evidence. These people do hold various scientific hypotheses to a way higher standard of evidence than they do their foundational religious beliefs. It’s obvious when they criticize stuff like big bang cosmology, which isn’t even in conflict with Christianity and actually serves to ground an argument for the existence of God. Or just being a Young Earther in general. If we had as many lines of independent evidence for Jesus being God as we do for the age of the Earth, they would readily accept it. Instead, we’re left with the transcendentals, various philosophical arguments for the existence of God, and a whole bunch of eye witness testimony and personal experiences (including modern miracles). Note: I’m not saying those lines of evidence are bad; they just would be dismissed by the AIG crowd if they were the evidence base we had for any of the scientific theories they think contradict Scripture.

[@adelinomorte7421]

@@MCJustJ420 ***yes science makes observations, experiments, theories, and publish the results, no claims; but who is entitled to understand what science says ? only people scientifically minded, not people who say that science is not reliable on subjects they are not qualified due to their wrong understanding of other sources like the bible, they understood only literally, and fanatically do not wont to study what they reed.***

[@MCJustJ420]

@@adelinomorte7421 The claim is that science is capable of answering all these questions Nothing you're saying really has anything to do with my point though

[@dougharding5231]

In point of fact we are totally surrounded with evidence, lots of it. It's how you interpret that evidence that counts. So yes, God's Word, although it requires faith, is also fully backed up by said evidence. If you're honest, you'll admit that the secular view of big bang, evolution, and billions of years requires at least a much faith as Bible believers.

[@paradigmbuster]

After the earth was created it was smooth and entirely covered with water. The darkness was on the sea floor, not the sea surface. Continental crust covered the entire surface under the water. The water was from the mist that watered the entire surface. Then the earth was transformed from smooth to one with continents and ocean basins with dry land apearing in 3 days. The light of the first day appeared when the water was shallow enough over the continental surface for the surface to be illuminated. The 4th day was the day when the purpose and authorship of tge celestial bodies was announced not the day they were placed. The sun had to pre exist the 4th day for there to be a 4th day.

[@onegreenev]

Here is an interesting thought which I proposed. We can only see that which is reflected into our eyes or directly from the source like a light bulb or star. We still only see that which actually reaches our eyes. Natural sensors to light. But what we perceive as dark is not actually dark but light that has not fallen on our eyes or reflected back into our eyes. So therefore the universe is not full of dark matter but full of LIGHT. Everywhere is light. There are shadows from a given light source but there is even light in the shadows because light fills the universe. It fills everything. It is everywhere all the time. God said, let there be light and it was so. Everywhere is light.

[@jerichosharman470]

When he said all that stuff about the planets, I’m surprised he didn’t also say “but no one has been there so no one knows “

[@sirsaint88]

We can know things about the planets because they're OBSERVABLE. From telescopes to advanced (and designed 😁) satellites sent into space. The strength of this speech is to show you that what is being peddled as knowledge on the BIG BANG really is speculation and guesses. (or narrative) The Big Bang is a theory in crisis, but it's the only accepted paradigm and there's real consequences for questioning it.

[@truth806]

But if he did say that he would be even MORE correct.

[@johndoh4064]

See; Russel's Tea Pot

[@jerichosharman470]

@@truth806 If he did say that it would show all the more his ignorance of science.

[@peterparker9286]

@@jerichosharman470 science is fake. There is Geology biology physics and tons more of a Real World that is Huge.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

I missed the parts of the video where astrophysicists or cosmologists presented the data that demonstrates Big Bang Theory to be incorrect, and also the part right after that where they explain why the cosmic microwave background, our expanding universe, and all the current mathematics and physics actually demonstrate something else, and then of course right after that where they explain that new theory. Time stamps?

[@WafleEnterprises]

Well, we’ve been able to accurately map the objects in the sky and the ones that move very accurately when they’re close to us, the farther we look out the harder it is. Our calculations still end up being fairly correct yet whether they were correct or not doesn’t prove the theory of expansion.

[@robmerrill3460]

According to the "bang theory", the cosmos has expanded to be larger than it's possible to be according to their own calculated data ---

[@ITPalGame]

You missed the astrophysicists giving lectures on other videos in this organization and others. Your attempts at snarkiness and sarcasm is duly noted.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@ITPalGame who cares?? This is an AIG video.. they're an apologetics ministry. They have a statement of faith on their website which quite clearly indicates they don't understand that scientists *must* follow the data and evidence before all else; beliefs and opinions must be set aside. Evidence must be followed *wherever* it may lead. They upload videos with terrible, dishonest titles like, 'scientists have LIED to us about the age of the Earth'.. and this video here, where we read the words, 'Big Bang *myth*' at the start of the video.. They deserve any and all backlash they get, especially from anyone who respects scientists and the hard work they do. Big Bang Theory has not been dismantled, and is not a myth. It is a *scientific theory* with problems and mysteries that still need to be solved. You know, like many scientific theories. That's kind of how science works. Scientists are doing the best they can. There is not a global hoax involving millions of scientists *lying* as AIG apparently seems to think. I'm sorry that you do not understand.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@ITPalGame 'your attempts at snarkiness and sarcasm are duly noted' AIG and their gross misrepresentations of various fields of science throughout the years have been, and are, duly noted by many, many people. It's a shame you are not one of them.

[@Mysticalady]

Well, as far as I see, there is no point of explanation. Believe what you want. .. Happy Easter! ❤

[@jameshughes2911]

Remember that to build a strong argument don't create a straw man of your opponents view but rather a steel man, then refute that. To forget this fundamental is to lay a trap for ones self.

[@adamboyen4727]

Let's correct this one at a time and the first error appeared in record time at 1:24 "evolution explains how the first ever organisms came to exist" (ok so I'm going to be paraphrasing a bit but we can agree that's basically what he said), no that is not evolution, that's a straw man, biological evolution is defined as "the theory of biodiversity" otherwise put evolution explains how life diversifies over time, the explanation for the origin of life is a different field of science known as 'origin of life studies' while evolution is 'evolutionary biology', let's see what's next shall we

[@cipri198zero]

Yup. A THEORY. Thats all. Still they teach that bull***t in schools.

[@adamboyen4727]

@@cipri198zero can you please define what a scientific theory is and the method behind how they become theories?

[@Piccodon]

Entropy denies evolution.

[@adamboyen4727]

@@Piccodon lol, entropy is thermodynamics, or as translated energy motion, I doubt you can even give me the entropy equation S=E/T, where S is entropy, E is energy and T is temperature, and entropy can actually decrease in local systems so long as the total entropy of the universe continues increasing, please do what I've done and do a physics course at uni

[@Piccodon]

@@adamboyen4727 Ahh the usual hubris. If a protein has a small defect it won't fold properly and becomes a problem. Complexity working correctly is not spontaneous or random. An eternity is not long enough to make it happen by random chance.

[@schmurgen5242]

This is the difference between science and religion. Science opens itself up to question. If a theory is found to be wrong, it is thought about again, it’s tested, it’s critiqued. Science is testable, demonstrable, repeatable. Does religion open itself for such debate? There is no other area in critic debate so utterly ring fenced

[@jimhughes1070]

Well that's just entirely incorrect sir... Christians have been debating anyone who will come... including each other... Science on the other hand... How did you put it? Listens to a theory test it to see if it will withstand scrutiny, and if not, change it? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Getting static on your radio is not mean you're listening to the background radiation of the Big bang.,. That is an untestable theory.... The universe is 13 and 1/2 billion years old.... That is an untestable theory... Should I go on, for like, another 24 hours or so? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 So-called science and it's journals are complete with religious ideology... And way more faith than it takes to believe in a creator

[@josephsalmonte4995]

In theory you're correct. In reality, anybody who questions modern science is belittled & ridiculed.

[@schmurgen5242]

@@jimhughes1070 ok Jim I respect your opinion. I personally can’t square the Abrahamic interpretation of God, although I live my life like there is a God. I think there is magic in the world and the universe and that science certainly doesn’t explain everything but we are on the right road with it.

[@JukeboxWithJay]

@@josephsalmonte4995 he didn’t mean questioned by idiots who don’t know how science works

[@jimhughes1070]

@@schmurgen5242 🤣🤣🤳🤳🙏🙏🥰🥰🥰

[@robertnielsen2461]

Try this in order for matter to expand there has to be space how did space begin?This is a quandary is it not?There is one supposition.What if there is no beginning or end?

[@davidhoward6450]

Mental! “He spoke and it was done!” 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 these people need locking up and throw away the key.

[@FlatsFisher73]

One of the most amazing thing god created was us! Think about how advanced our bodies are on healing and daily operations. Science still hasn’t caught up to where we are. Ty father for what you have done!

[@SimpleAmadeus]

@Jason Shearin Religious gratitude*.

[@noneyabidness9644]

In order for gravity to be the binding force, the individual gravity of each particle must be greater than it's mass. Otherwise, it would simply collect, but never compact.

[@adamrspears1981]

No. You are forgetting the role of the strong nuclear force.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@adamrspears1981 that only applies when in close proximity.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@adamrspears1981 in fact, it is only active in the space of a nucleon.

[@adamrspears1981]

@@noneyabidness9644 some particles are not stable by their self. & gravitational influence bewteen 2 or more massive bodies diminishes over the distance(s) between those bodies.

[@noneyabidness9644]

@@adamrspears1981 yes. Which is what I'm stating. Particles must attract other particles, as they expand outward from their origin. So their force needs to be greater than their combined mass to do anything more than infinitely moving away from their origin, and endlessly drawing upon one another. It is similar in nature to how the balance of an asymptote approaches, but never reaches zero. (Obviously this doesn't take into account the gravitational forces of all the other particles pulling on each other. As the over all forces would cancel out, as one particle pulls one direction, and another pulls in the opposite direction, from all sides.) There MUST be a force acting upon them, greater than that of their gravity, to bridge this gap and upset that balance.

[@user-rt9bj7zt2d]

how the world will end. Surah al-Anbiya 104. On the Day when We fold the heaven, like the folding of a book. Just as We began the first creation, so We will repeat it-a promise binding on Us. We will do it.

[@dowpman1]

first incorrect thing i heard... the earth is the only planet with liquid water. seasonal liquid water forms on mars every year.

[@totobermundo]

I don't buy that but okay. That means...?

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

I missed that part.. he actually said Earth is the only planet with liquid water? How the heck would he know? Also, H2O is rather common in the universe. The moon Enceladus has a subterranean ocean for example.. geysers of water shooting out into space. Gotta love how these people just make stuff up. Wait, no, I hate it.

[@thecaptain7238]

Love seeing a Christian with a bit of smugness and arrogance. You’re entitled to it when you’re right

[@itsjustaname7311]

31:30 .. savage statement :D

[@ghostl1124]

I had an impromtu lunch with Dr. Morenson once at the Creation Museum cafe. He was a nice, regualar, reasonable guy.

[@hugoanson2135]

??? Ahm, can you add something reasonable he said directly to you that helped you please?

[@wpochert]

Jupiter has total solar eclipses all the time with its various moons

[@georgelaforce1028]

Yes but these eclipses cover the sun completely. On earth, from our perspective, you can see a halo around the moon because the size and the distance is unique to our planet.

[@wpochert]

@@georgelaforce1028 are you aware that its only temporary? Just like the north star. The moon is moving away from us..always has been. In the ancient past the sun was completely covered, and in the not so distant future we will only get annular eclipses. That's how the solar system works

[@godergodel1649]

The YEC argument was that earth/moon solar eclipse was designed. But it happen elsewhere not just on earth, so it is not unique.

[@tiborpurzsas2136]

@@godergodel1649 also why would God design such a solar eclipse as ours ? It's not necessary for earth's biology or anything fundamental. Religious ppl just don't understand how enormous the universe is ! Among so many billions of galaxies, stars,and planets, all kind of combinations may occur between the heavenly bodies! By chance the earth moon sun relationship turned out this way ! There is nothing mysterious about it, it didn't have to be designed that way.

[@godergodel1649]

@@tiborpurzsas2136 "also why would God design such a solar eclipse as ours ?" The moon was closer before, then there was a different relationship,. In the future the moon will be further away, then it have a different relationship than now.

[@mixmastermaverick3336]

😂😂😂😂 the sheer, unprovoked ignorance of this video.

[@nphiro5030]

There is one assumption being made in the video that I dusagree with; the idea that the heavens and the earth mentioned in Genesis is the same as the entire universe. This assumption is false. The heavens and the earth can be any subset of the universe which is associated within locale of a particular created orb and need not be interpreted as the entirety of the universe.

[@seanmartin2185]

More importantly the Christians do have an answer about Starlight and how we can see that. 17 references in the Bible talk about the Lord stretching out the heavens. I am shocked that he has missed that. Great talk! Really wonderful good points and dead on accurate! Here are 17 references to how Christians are certainly able to answer distant starlight: Here are the 17 Bible verses: 2 Samuel 22:10 “He bowed the heavens also, and came down; and darkness was under his feet.” Job 9:8 “Which alone spreadeth out the heavens, and treadeth upon the waves of the sea.” Job 26:7 “He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.” Job 37:18 “Hast thou with him spread out the sky, which is strong, and as a molten looking glass?” Psalm 18:9 “He bowed the heavens also, and came down: and darkness was under his feet.” Psalm 104:2 “Who coverest thyself with light as with a garment: who stretchest out the heavens like a curtain.” Psalm 144:5 “Bow thy heavens, O LORD, and come down: touch the mountains, and they shall smoke.” Isaiah 40:22 “It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in.” Isaiah 42:5 “Thus saith God the LORD, he that created the heavens, and stretched them out; he that spread forth the earth, and that which cometh out of it; he that giveth breath unto the people upon it, and spirit to them that walk therein.” Isaiah 44:24 “Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself.” Isaiah 45:12 “I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.” Isaiah 48:13 “Mine hand also hath laid the foundation of the earth, and my right hand hath spanned the heavens: when I call unto them, they stand up together.” Isaiah 51:13 “And forgettest the LORD thy maker, that hath stretched forth the heavens, and laid the foundations of the earth; and hast feared continually every day because of the fury of the oppressor, as if he were ready to destroy? and where is the fury of the oppressor?” Jeremiah 10:12 “He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heavens by his discretion.” Jeremiah 51:15 “He hath made the earth by his power, he hath established the world by his wisdom, and hath stretched out the heaven by his understanding.” Ezekiel 1:22 “And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living creature was as the color of the terrible crystal, stretched forth over their heads above.” Zechariah 12:1 “The burden of the word of the LORD for Israel, saith the LORD, which stretcheth forth the heavens, and layeth the foundation of the earth, and formeth the spirit of man within him.” Distant starlight makes sense now, doesn't it? The whole universe has been stretched! Dimensional folding, like curtains above. The Bible has been right all along. No "static universe" out there. The former “Steady State theory" for the universe was unbiblical, and therefore in error. The scientists were wrong about science - again! Whenever the Bible and the scientists disagree … just give the scientific community more time! 😉

[@curtisreimer4592]

Well said

[@seanmartin2185]

@@curtisreimer4592 thank you I appreciate you!

[@curtisreimer4592]

@@seanmartin2185 no problem

[@curtisreimer4592]

@@therick363 correct that's why I watch Stephen Meyers not genesis

[@curtisreimer4592]

@@therick363 however of evidence continues to point toward intelligent design as it has Sean would be correct in looking to more theological explaination

[@robbanxdrums7047]

Psalms 19:1 Werner Von Braun

[@clementgavi7290]

Search like those must find and find like those who must search again, for those are at the end are just beginning. God being the infinite and man being the finite. Man's reason alone cannot allows man to reach the integral determination, in other words, the very beginning of things.