This WILL CHANGE How You Work With Strings - Advanced TypeScript Magic!

[@punithg1572]

This channel is just super fun! I’m super curious on how you come with these ideas though.

[@Typed-Rocks]

Thank you 😁, I like to fiddle around with the more unusual parts of languages so as soon as you start to do that, the ideas will come naturally 🤘

[@KamelJabber1]

Fantastic content and we'll presented!

[@Typed-Rocks]

Thank you 😁

[@MrAlao675]

you solve typescript types as if you don't know anything else... well done man.

[@Typed-Rocks]

Everyone needs a hobby 😝

[@LePhenixGD]

You never fail to amaze us ! This is wonderful !!!

[@Typed-Rocks]

Thank you so much for your kind words. Glad it is helpful ☺️🤘

[@danko95bgd]

Wow typescript is so cool and powerful. Maybe it can tell me if func could throw an error, oh wait.

[@Typed-Rocks]

While I see your point, many languages think checked exceptions were a mistake. Often they just get thrown further.

[@gerkim62]

This is the biggest issue in typescript by far

[@pierwszywolnynick]

every function can throw an error, a stack overflow or out of memory, checked exceptions are just irritating

[@BeeBeeEight]

Amazing work there. I remember u covered how to make sure rgb values has exactly 3 numbers with template literals. Now I feel like trying with this method to make sure those numbers are within range (0-255).

[@Typed-Rocks]

You could but it could make your types quite recursively deep and not that well readable. So always keep that in mind 🤘👍

[@precisionchoker]

Wow this is awesome Subscribed

[@Typed-Rocks]

Awesome, thank you!

[@balaclava351]

Can you explain how to limit a number to range. Currently if I want to restrict a number to be `

[@djs-vids]

hihi! How do you view the result of the type as a comment like that (3:04)? You were using a different IDE before but not it's finally VSCode I think. Great content btw!

[@Typed-Rocks]

Thank you 🤘. It‘s called „twoslash-queries“ for vscode and „witt“ for Jetbrains.

[@dave6012]

I opening a PR with this type first thing monday morning

[@Typed-Rocks]

Keep me updated if they liked it 🤘😁

[@moneyfr]

you should work with valibot

[@Typed-Rocks]

I will look into it. Looks interesting 👍🤘

[@snatvb]

it would be great to have possibility to add own error messages :)

[@Typed-Rocks]

We could make it so that instead of never, it returns an object type with an error property in

[@snatvb]

@@Typed-Rocks but it's not an really error. I mean improvement TS compiler :) but it's just kinda my "ny wish" :D

[@ИльяСтрелец-ц4к]

Think it's better to take string's "length" property directly, as it is readonly despite arrays length property which can be set directly by programmer

[@Typed-Rocks]

In types you can‘t use the length property of the string as it‘s just „string“. That‘s why you need to do that trick.

[@kettenbach]

@@Typed-Rocksthis gives compile time support also. String.length is runtime

[@pierwszywolnynick]

very cool but as always - please don't actually use it, especially for comparing large numbers; you will kill the compiler and IDE performance quickly

[@AbhiShake-pl3cf]

Counter doesnt need to be an array. It should just be a readonly number

[@Typed-Rocks]

It cant, as we need to update the counter every recursive iteration. Otherwise we would need to create an array and increment it and put it back into a number each time.

[@AbhiShake-pl3cf]

Ah yes i just tried and i cant just increment numeric type. Sorry for saying that without confirming it. You are awesome

[@Typed-Rocks]

@ no worries. Thanks for your comment 😁

[@jfftck]

Isn’t this getting outside the domain of types? I don’t understand why you would really want or need this, it is a lot of computation on something that should be a concrete type definition. This is bad practice for typing and I wouldn’t use this code in my code base, it’s also pointed out that runtime checks are necessary for any values that are not consistent.

[@kuyugama]

There are no real usage for this