This Will Make You Believe In Creation Science! with Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson | Traced: Episode 11

The scientific establishment laid out a standard for biblical creationists to meet decades ago: lay out testable scientific models that generate reliable predictions. Dr. Jeanson has met and exceeded that "gold standard" with his new genetic research confirming biblical timelines.
It’s groundbreaking scientific research that provides revolutionary discoveries about “race,” ethnicity, and even human history. And it’s only possible because the researcher, Harvard-trained Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, starts with the history and the timeline God has given us in his Word.
See the full playlist of Traced episodes here: • Traced: DNA's Big Surp...
Order the book now:
AnswersInGenesis.org/store/pr...
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world:
AnswersinGenesis.org/give.

[@rafaelshumaker1883]

Peter summed it up when he said that unrighteous people are willfully ignorant of the truth. They know what the truth is. But they wilfully ignore it anyway.

[@Standing.W.Israel]

Absolutely.... which is what I call out those people who just want to personally attack and argue with me over my beliefs without wanting to engage the reasons for my faith.

[@susanhooks2988]

My boss once told me the 6 days creation is about the amount of time in their days. I told him when I get to heaven I'm going to ask God why he took 6 days. He could have done it in a moment. People try to put God in a box and limit His power by our understanding. HE IS GOD. Stop thinking He is man!!!

[@winniecash1654]

Exactly.

[@spamm0145]

God made a human body that processes more instructions per second than every computer in the world combined, using a mere 20 watts of electricity. He is beyond comprehension, he has more thoughts in a single second then every living organism combined from the beginning of the creation to the end. Only a fool would try to constrain him by the laws and limitations that impede us.

[@susanhooks2988]

Love your answer. It's obvious He gave you some extra smart genes. Merry Christmas ❤

[@meg5333]

The reason God made the world in 6 days is because He was setting a precedent for us. We should work 6 days give a day of rest to God.

[@janeladik1580]

It seems to me the only real science being done to day supports a young earth. Evolutionist typically insult my intelligence with unsupported stories that fall inline more with myth than science. I am so impressed with not only your work, but all the work shown on the “Finding Answers in Genesis” series. Thank you for following the ‘science’.

[@AllOtherNamesUsed]

After we establish that science has been hijacked as a political, religious, philosophical attack (as documented long ago, see the video Pagan/Freemasonic roots of Evo on my list for some background) I highly suggest you waste no time and turn your focus to Revelation as it appears to be the most important document on earth (after grounding your trust in Yeshua Jesus). Do not let the enemy distract you with endless ploys, tactics and guises (incl. false Christians that frequent these boards) and keep you stuck 1000s of years in the past on Genesis 1.1. Things are developing quickly in a predictable way according to scriptures. You may want to see my latest video as a starter. God bless.

[@Travis_Trauma]

So true

[@History_MadeMe_Catholic]

It's the ridicule that ultimately shows itself as an unstable approach to science. Remember; If darwins theory of natural selection is true, it spells an end to human rationality. This idea of "God & then Science separate" was set up in Europe by the atheists/Marxist/communists, showing themselves as scientifically illiterate by standing on one theory and swearing by it. . If the mind has been cobbled together by mindless undirected processes why should we trust our cognitive faculties and the validity of anything we think and produce? Human reasoning and consciousness can't be answered for by the evolutionists but the scientists that are using theory of relativity and quantum mechanics are saying WE ARE FORCED TO SEE GOD. Check out Mathematician of Oxford, John Lennox, he talks about the validity and harmony of God and science. The Cambridge Doctorate of science and history John Hedley Brooke wrote a fascinating book called "History of science and Religion" very fascinating considering the argument doesn't go back to science and religion but to whole different things that formed into this false idea of God and science being two separate things. .

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

Why would you rely on Answers in Genesis to learn anything about any field of science? Have you read their statement of faith? They are anti-science by their own admission. Concerning biological evolution, if you don't think it's fact, you simply don't understand it.

[@History_MadeMe_Catholic]

@@travisbicklepopsicle To assume that I RELY on something because once I used a little short video that you most likely didn't listen to. . You don't understand language. .

[@anonymousone2843]

I will definitely be sending ALOT of this information to my oldest daughter. She is a biologist who believes in the Lord, yet struggles with belief in Creation. It comes as no surprise that she does struggle with it given her education, but I will not give up hope or give up on her! God Bless 🥰

[@0animalproductworld558]

God bless your daughter 🍁 and all those who have God 🐃

[@dancingnature]

Don’t waste your time . Evolving a short lived organism is a biology 101 experiment

[@rhondaadams4013]

How can she believe in the Lord of Creation, yet not believe in the Creation of the Lord??

[@jasperkloosterman747]

@@dancingnature they have been done for years, the only problem is that it doesn’t give the results that supports macro evolution. Actually quite the opposite.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

Praying for her

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

Nehemiah 9:6 “You alone are the Lord. You have made the heavens, The heaven of heavens with all their host, The earth and all that is on it, The seas and all that is in them. You give life to all of them And the heavenly host bows down before You.

[@darrenmiller6927]

I love answers in Genesis. These people have helped me so much. Coming back to the Lord after so many years has been a back and forth struggle. Don't get me wrong what a blessing to be called out of darkness by the very cross of Christ. And Answers in Genesis has been a super boost from the Lord in reading and listening to the new intelligent design guys like Demski's book, Behe, Stephen Myer. But these people have brought me back to Genesis. These young earth scientists like Jeanson and his friends have given me back Genesis and so a foundational part of God's word and so the gospel itself. I think I'm a young earther.. I think I have actually learned what that means among old earth creationists and naturalist evolutionist atheists. I actually am beginning to understand the positions and where I feel God insists I must stand as a believer. I am beginning to have defense for what I believe is the gospel. What a gift. Answers in Genisis, in my humble opinion, are equipping the saints of God to have ready defense for The Faith. What else can I say about men and women, even scientists included, such as this? Just God bless you! I pray your work will grow by the grace of God. You people are part of how we know God has not left us defenseless among the athiest and naturalist scientist wolves of our age.

[@AllOtherNamesUsed]

Welcome back to the fold. I highly suggest you turn your focus now to Revelation as it appears to be the most important document on earth (after grounding your trust in Yeshua Jesus). Don’t let the enemy keep you stuck 1000s of years in the past unable to make it past Genesis 1.1. You may want to see my latest video as a starter. God bless.

[@thedebatefinisher..5521]

I am a scientist, and all scientist knows God is real.. they just deny it out of pride, and come up with a different explanation, which is according to scripture, scripture says man will deny God because of pride and science falsely so called.. see all scientist knows God exist, they just will not admit it and tell people the truth.. man doesn't like being wrong.. man doesn't like answering to a higher authority.. but I been a graduate since 1998, studying with a masters degree in science for over 20 plus years. And God is real.. now.. our science can not prove God does not exist, and it can not prove God does exist 100 percent.. but it can point towards God being real or point towards God not being real.. now.. it actually points directly towards God being the creator of everything you see.. for sure.. without doubt.. even tho science can't prove either 100 percent if God does or dont.don't.. but it does point directly towards God being the creator of everything you see on such an astronomically greater level than anything ever studied.. on an astonishingly greater level.. see our science is a natural thing.. it's a natural process, a natural study.. and something that is natural can not reveal 100 percent a God that is supernatural or unnatural... because science is a natural thing, it's our God given knowledge.. it's our flesh and mind knowledge.. it's natural.. GOD IS NOT NATURAL.. God is a spirit and our father, who manifest himself through the flesh, Jesus christ. Just to save us from hell.. that's how much our father truly loves us... science definitely points directly towards God being the creator of everything you see included me and you.. and if any man, woman, or eveb another scientist looks at you and says, I studied this and God does not exist, then that scientist has lied Straight to your face... God bless you.. but don't even trust all the scientist even like myself.. believe ok God and trust and have faith in Jesus christ, without science.. or God will seek that you needed science to prove and believe in him.. and therefore be cast into the lake of firemm because we are saved by grace through faith... but repentance is Part of that faith.. because Jesus christ himself said, repent or perish.. Jesus christ said,,, I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance... God bless you, and yes the science is good, I'm a scientist and I love it... but.bit.. let GOD BE TRUE AND EVERY MAN A LIE.. GOD BLESS YOU AND TRUST GOD, AND THE RESURRECTION OF JESUS CHRIST BEFORE ANYTHING OF MAN... GOD BLESS YOU AGAIN AND AGAIN..

[@shannaconda3434]

Don't be surprised if you get ridiculed by the two trolls that I've seen on here but don't take it to heart, they provide no explanations in their trollery.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@shannaconda3434 'they provide no explanations in their trollery' Come on, Shann😳 some people are jerks, absolutely, but others such as myself have provided plenty of information for you concerning biological evolution and other science related subjects that you could look into if you were truly interested. (Yes, I can be a jerk too sometimes and I apologize if I've said anything that you perceived as insulting) You are not interested in learning about science if it contradicts your personal beliefs. That's not the way we approach science. You have to let go of your biases and beliefs and just go with the data and evidence no matter what. No evidence supports a young earth, and no evidence falsifies biological evolution. You can either accept those facts, or not. It's entirely up to you.

[@eradutiu]

@@travisbicklepopsicle I see you ignore the aspect of our spiritual side of our being. That part of ourselves gives insight, you may say is the key to unlocking those facts you see as a scientist. Everything is done with purpose. We are created to discover what God created. You were not born knowing anything yet due to studying things on earth you declare you know how the earth was made. And yet, as you continue to study your view point will change which should be a strong indicator you really don’t know so let the Bible teach you.

[@222ableVelo]

This is very fascinating stuff! Thank you Dr. Jeanson. I ordered a hard copy of the book. And I'm looking forward to reading it!

[@debragrubbs1038]

Where is the info to order this book?

[@MrSontaran3]

Great work, Dr. Nathaniel! God bless your wit, intelligence, and thoroughness in conveying so much relevant information to us laymen. Thank you! Very well done.

[@anthonyv8190]

One testable prediction is stated in Genesis 1 regarding the reproduction of both plants and animals "after his kind" (Genesis 1:11-12, 21, 24-25). Darwin's earth-shaking "discovery" was that a finch had evolved into... wait for it... a finch!! IF Darwin's "Common Ancestor" was not a figment of his imagination, and IF Darwin's counterfeit "Tree of Life" had a scintilla of scientific merit to it, kinds (or, species) would be bearing young that would be mutating into alternate kinds, or species. But that is not the case. The Fossil Record undeniably shows that that has NEVER been the case! Kinds reproduction after their kind, and only after their kind, is a testable prediction. I defy you to produce for us all the living or fossilized contradiction of that prediction.

[@dancingnature]

You do understand that no organism evolves out of its ancestry , right? That why humans and other land vertebrates are considered to be Sarcopterygii (lobefinned fish)

[@MCHRQRD]

Well said. I've heard for years that our DNA has no traceable path from other primates. There seems to be many more alterations in DNA than could ever be generated randomly. Also, there are innovative and constructive changes that could not have arisen from random changes through out the animal kingdom. So your work is validating that the human DNA changes are only consistent with the young earth history. Each animal should be able to reflect this too, if the studies were done with this much specificity. Keep at it, and nature's written record of the flood is likely to be revealed.

[@marksmith3820]

thrre are clear priven links between primates and humans. typical christian ignore science evidence

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

Creationists have already disproved that chimps and humans have 98% similarities in DNA. You may want to look it up.

[@marksmith3820]

rubbish. clearly know nothing about evolution

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

@@Bomtombadi1 is that all you've heard? Really?

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

Human evolution has a 5 million year history and 200k in our current configuration. Being ignorant of the evidence certainly isn't an argument against it.

[@TickedOffPriest]

I actually understood most of this one.

[@shdwbnndbyyt]

Based on previous establishment science behaviors, the "standard" will be changed once it is met by the evidence by non-approved models. The "approved" models (and the massive funding and prestige wrapped up in it) must be protected at all costs.

[@MaryEllen505]

I love that Dr Jeanson lays out the already-published-by-evolutionist info, explaining clearly how it was obtained and reported, before moving on. A lot of it goes over my head, but the road he draws as he describes it all does not, and just that part, to me, is fascinating... very telling of where their faith is.

[@danfarrand9072]

I would not matter if you could prove Creation. People who do not want to believe, will not believe. Just like the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man says when the Rich Man asks that his brothers be visited and warned. Abraham replied, essentially they have all the evidence they need. That is not to say that your work is not worthwhile. Those who stand in "authority" will never concede, but those who have an ear to hear will listen. Just dont expect the priests of this age to ever say, "you were right, we see it now"

[@mattbrock124]

You’re absolutely right. But it’s awesome learning what we faithfully knew all along.

[@juiceboxmania1558]

It also doesn’t matter how much you prove evolution. Christians don’t want to believe it and therefore they won’t.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

That's not always the case, I would love to believe, but I just can't. I can't force myself to believe something.

[@mattbrock124]

@@travisbicklepopsicle if I may, what is it exactly that makes it most difficult for you to believe?

[@mattbrock124]

@@travisbicklepopsicle there is something in you that wants to believe. You WANT to find a good solid, concrete reason to believe. Otherwise , you wouldn’t be here. I can give you quote a few examples of how science proves the existence of God and confirms the Bible to be tried and true. But I don’t want to step on any toes man. If you’re interested, I guess just lmk. 🤝

[@Steblu74]

When Daniel's angelic visitor informs him that "knowledge shall be increased" in the days leading up to Christ's return (Daniel 12:4), most of us never thought about Biblical knowledge being increased as well. The confirmation of the Biblical account from all true sciences is literally overwhelming! Those in Christ love it, and those still at war with God hate it. War is coming. Do NOT fear ; )

[@AllOtherNamesUsed]

I think the context of that promise points to increased understanding of the end of the age prophesies Daniel did not understand. Now after we establish that science has been hijacked as a political, religious, philosophical attack (as documented long ago, see the video Pagan/Freemasonic roots of Evo on my list for some background) I highly suggest we waste no time and turn our focus to Revelation as it appears to be the most important document on earth (after grounding your trust in Yeshua Jesus). Do not let the enemy distract you with endless ploys, tactics and guises (incl. false Christians that frequent these boards and channels) and keep you stuck 1000s of years in the past on Genesis 1.1. Things are developing quickly in a predictable way according to scriptures. Knowledge is indeed increasing and the plan is becoming very clear. You may want to see my latest video as a starter. God bless.

[@johnsanabria3279]

This will be another reason for God to tell those at the Great White Throne Judgement that they had another chance to accept Him and refused!

[@kriskhinson443]

The so-called Evolution scientists have no obligation to a higher authority like we do. They're their own gods.

[@Mockturtlesoup1]

Except many of them are Christians(or Jews, Muslims, Hindus, etc.)

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@Kris K Hinson *As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming. I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that* -- Francis Collins Led the Human Genome Project. Is a Christian creationist. Most Christians around the world have no problems accepting the facts of biological evolution.

[@shannaconda3434]

​@@Mockturtlesoup1 Really? How so?

[@krisv001]

Interesting stuff :)

[@ty2124]

Shalom and thank you for continuing gold standard science. To God be the glory. Maranatha.

[@martino8114]

Doc. … God bless ya young man! I get kinda choked up with happy tears welling just seeing all that you are and have been doing …. I truly gave up.. before I stumbled on you … lol god showed me that I wasn’t alone in my beliefs opinions and values … thank Gesù ed Dio! LoL

[@markm8188]

Thank you, sir. I enjoyed the content very much.

[@CBess]

Fascinating and encouraging! Soli Deo Gloria

[@OrthodoxKyle]

I got his book, thank you for your work!!!

[@sabhishek9289]

Hey Kyle. Love seeing you here. God bless you.

[@vincetoscano7018]

The Evolutionist can't change there paradigm, they are dependent on a paycheck. And the ones that hold the purse strings will defend there side no matter what. What was that famous quote "truth truth!!! You can't handle the Truth". Thank you Dr. Jeanson for all your hard work. I am a firm believer in " the truth will set you free", not matter where it leads.

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

The heavens declare the glory of God; And the firmament shows His handiwork. 2 Day unto day utters speech, And night unto night reveals knowledge. 3 There is no speech nor language Where their voice is not heard. 4 Their line has gone out through all the earth, And their words to the end of the world. In them He has set a tabernacle for the sun, 5 Which is like a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, And rejoices like a strong man to run its race. 6 Its rising is from one end of heaven, And its circuit to the other end; And there is nothing hidden from its heat Psalm 19:1-6

[@claytonmcclain182]

So to be honest the scientists have waisted their time in collage because their minds are closed to the truth. Thank you for that truth. God bless.

[@garywalker447]

Nope. Scientists seek the truth by way of evidence, not the fairy tales in your blood soaked bible.

[@claytonmcclain182]

@@garywalker447 Haha you just proved my point and as a defender of science your to ignorant to know you did. Haha good job. So like I said scientists of Evilution wouldn't know truth if it was told to them in a post that their to ignorant to understand.

[@captaingaza2389]

Nope You’re too dim to comprehend you’re being lied too You’re dim because belief for you is better than evidence And how do you defend that belief? With LIES, lots and lots of LIES!!!

[@feedingravens]

@@claytonmcclain182 "too ignorant" - and you are woke, you UNDERSTAND science, by your christian gut feeling. Regarding ignorant - "So to be honest the scientists have waisted their time in collage because their minds are closed to the truth. Thank you for that truth. God bless." "Haha you just proved my point and as a defender of science your to ignorant to know you did. Haha good job. So like I said scientists of Evilution wouldn't know truth if it was told to them in a post that their to ignorant to understand." Correct: "So, to be honest, the scientists have wasted their time in college because their minds are closed to the truth. Thank you for that truth. God bless." "Haha, you just proved my point and as a defender of science you are too ignorant to know you did. Haha, good job. So like I said, scientists of Evilution wouldn't know truth if it was told to them in a post that they are too ignorant to understand." And I am no native speaker Evilution cannot be evil, your guru Ken Ham desperately needs it or his miraculous diversification of species from a few thousand kinds is impossible. And to get e.g. the marsupials and the humans (all inbred descendants from Noah to Australia, he also needs a continent wandering in at least miles/year instead of the measured 1-2 inches/year. Off by a factor of at least 50,000, And we experience what happens when the earth move a few feet, massive earthquakes, tsunamis. Ken needs 15 feet/DAY to rip off America from Europe. Your triumphant "we know it, and you and all your scientists are too stupid and too stubborn and too satanic to understand" is the usual arrogance of christiance, that need not more than someone telling them "when you believe me, then I can tell you you OWN the truth. And you do not need to know or understand anything, you are always right." Ignorance, incuriosity and laziness as ultimate virtues. I heard it often enough that christians are to believe without evidence, or even better, AGAINST the evidence. That gives blind faith a very concrete meaning.

[@suelacombe7396]

So amazing! Truth, the one and only, always prevails! Thank you!

[@StandingForTruthMinistries]

Great presentation! And I loved the refutation of Dr. Herman Mays.

[@VindensSaga]

People who talk a lot of about evidence and science don't understand how getting to the evidence and science works. Scientists are also human, they have the same egotistical flaws as other people have. I find it hilarious when people think scientists do no wrong (or would do no wrong) or is a paragon of morals.

[@mariafernandez6439]

Thank you for your research, you are a thorn in the flesh to the evolutionists.

[@AntonsClass]

I got his book and I love it!

[@colleenbrookes-gain6662]

Fascinating as usual ...

[@annamo6927]

Loved your book Dr. Jeanson. I will share with the brethren.

[@tinfacesful]

The Evolutionist will bend the evidence any which way to avoid God

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@tinfacesful oh, come on :-) most Christians and people of other faiths and religions around the world have no trouble accepting the facts of nature and evolution. It's just the way life on Earth works. Francis Collins is the geneticist who led the human genome project. He's a Christian creationist, not 'young Earth' of course, because all data and evidence from genetics and other related fields demonstrate all life shares a common ancestor. All life is related. *As someone who's had the privilege of leading the human genome project, I've had the opportunity to study our own DNA instruction book at a level of detail that was never really possible before. It's also now been possible to compare our DNA with that of many other species. The evidence supporting the idea that all living things are descended from a common ancestor is truly overwhelming. I would not necessarily wish that to be so, as a Bible-believing Christian. But it is so. It does not serve faith well to try to deny that* -- Francis Collins

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@tinfacesful Baylor University is a private Christian university, and a Rank 1 Research Institute. This is a statement from their biology department: *Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence and is accepted by the vast majority of scientists. Because it is fundamental to the understanding of modern biology, the faculty in the Biology Department at Baylor University (Waco, TX) teach evolution throughout the biology curriculum. We are in accordance with the American Association for Advancement of Science’s statement on evolution. We are a science department, so we do not teach alternative hypotheses or philosophically deduced theories that cannot be tested rigorously* '..Because it is fundamental to the understanding of modern biology' Any change in the inherited traits or characteristics of a population of organisms through successive generations is evolution. That's a basic definition as used by the world's biologists / geneticists. The quotes I gave you, from Francis Collins and Baylor University, are just a couple of examples out of thousands. Like I said before, most Christians have no trouble accepting the facts of biological evolution. It is *demonstrable*, it is a *fact*. That's why we have something called evolutionary theory. Theories in science explain facts. The germ theory of disease, atomic theory, evolutionary theory, etc., they all explain facts. There's a field of science called *evolutionary medicine* which is based of course on evolution and how it works in nature. *Evolutionary Medicine* ..EM.. it *works*, it's a real thing, because evolution is a real thing 👍

[@kathleennorton7913]

​@travisbicklepopsicle2108 Christians institutions are not immune to being debauched. Humans are all subject to becoming brainwashed and delusional.

[@andrewthomas2353]

Wow! This is great! I teach Comparative Worldview class and love evidence of creation!

[@iaindcosta]

..this highlights the problem with the peer review system- that it's a PEER review SYSTEM, ALL fields should be reviewing all fields to prevent circular reasoning and unproven assumptions from being part of the data supposedly testing assumptions

[@captaingaza2389]

How exactly is a cosmologist supposed to review the work done by a geologist??? What a dense suggestion

[@jimhughes1070]

They might have a difficult time "falsifying" the Big bang theory..."testing" to see if it's verifiably true 🤣... It seems to me that one animal turning into a completely different animal (kinds), should be fairly '"falsifiable".... And nobody has ever proved to me that that happened... Love these lessons brother

[@shipwright6122]

The JWST has just thrown a big wrench into the Big Bang theory. The pictures of the oldest galaxies look the same as the supposed young ones. Looks like God made them all at the same time, day 4

[@jimhughes1070]

@@shipwright6122 and another cog dissipates into the ethereal 🤣🤣🤣🙏🙏🙏🙏🤳🥰

[@shipwright6122]

@@jimhughes1070 There’s still time to repent. 🙏🏼✝️🥰

[@jimhughes1070]

@@shipwright6122 indeed!... As long as there's breath, there's hope... First they got to leave the delusion of evolution far behind🤣🤣🙏🙏🤳

[@shipwright6122]

@@Bomtombadi1 Hope to see you at the pearly gates 🙏🏼

[@bobpegram8042]

Iam reading TRACED. I am near the end. It is fascinating and riveting. I keep reading it at the end of the day.

[@paulmiller7775]

Thank you for this series examining and validating the data! I look forward to the next segment!

[@rosstemple7617]

And I love that you give them a very generous leeway. And yet the percentage still doesn’t come close to millions of years. My one question is can we find DNA jumps in mutations do to lack of nutritional information. Or bacterial infection. I know I’m getting a lot of push back because they say bacteria is evidence that evolution is possible. The second thing watching this to think of the people in the Bible that lived for 900+ years. Can we judge history from looking at data now compared with ancient DNA. I think it would even be worse for their case as well.

[@glanyan5462]

Could AIG make a 10 minute video summary of the book for the common man? Then maybe a part 2 that goes into more detail. Then part 3, etc ...

[@quickattackfilms7923]

Love what you guys are doing, really stoked… but by George I wish he would pronounce “Narrate” as “Nair-rate”. Like he’s saying “Gnar-rative” lol

[@notmyrealname2592]

Love this guy!

[@ManfredYB]

Shalom dr Jeanson, This keeps on fascinating me!! Keep up the good work, really looking forward to you responding to critics 🤗🤓🙏🏼🙏🏼 Yah bless

[@thea1ien0ntheufo94]

Thank you

[@sabhishek9289]

God bless you Dr Nathaniel Jeanson.

[@rallyl7053]

Love this series

[@misternewman1576]

Anyone who denies divine creation is in denial and will go to any length to justify their rebellious, sinful lifestyle.

[@torppatoni]

This video is excellent and shows how young earth creationists have taken the driver's seat in the scientific debate.

[@billjohnson9472]

he is arguing that the timescale of evolution had to be much longer than previously thought. how can that support young earth at all?

[@matthewaislabie7354]

What a wonderful time in which we live. Thankyou.

[@michaeljenniferbrabson6263]

YHVH bless you Dr Jeanson. Maranatha

[@edpayne2626]

You fully have proven what I have always known by faith, you see, I have this book called the bible.

[@garywalker447]

These frauds have proven nothing. They have made a fool of you with technobabble and lies.

[@nathanhalsey3969]

Awesome... Keep up the great work... Terrific book traced is... 👍👍

[@carolynbillington9018]

great content

[@jvo3777]

Get right with God friends, don't wait another day! About 500 prophecies fulfilled hundreds and thousands of years in advance prove the Bible is God's word. Believe and repent, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4!

[@philhart4849]

I have no time for the book of fairy tales known as the Bible.

[@davidyang8550]

I love thy work. That's why I started to study chemistry.

[@froggygreen2876]

Terrific!

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

[@Chicken_Mama_85]

This is such exciting research. I’m very interested to see how this field continues to reveal the truth of creation as the technology improves and more research is done. So cool that you were able to pull out that data they though they hid so well. I love seeing creationists on the offensive!

[@philhart4849]

Creation is a myth that requires the existence of the fictional God of the Bible.

[@jakehickox7275]

Of course there is a Creator. After all, matter can't create itself. (Why do so many atheists reject science?)

[@drewdrake9130]

Is this Creator made of matter, or is this creator immaterial?

[@jakehickox7275]

@@drewdrake9130 "Is this Creator made of matter, or is this creator immaterial?" Red herring. The topic is 'Is there a Creator, or not?', the topic is not 'What are the attributes of the Creator?'.

[@drewdrake9130]

@@jakehickox7275 Not a red herring at all If matter can't create itself, and your creator is made of matter, then your creator didn't make itself. This is why I asked my previous question So I will ask again... Is this Creator made of matter, or is it immaterial?

[@jakehickox7275]

@@drewdrake9130 "If matter can't create itself, and your creator is made of matter, then your creator didn't make itself." I never said that the Creator was made of matter. Please stop with your red herring. "Is this Creator made of matter, or is this creator immaterial?" Red herring. The topic is 'Is there a Creator, or not?', the topic is not 'What are the attributes of the Creator?'.

[@drewdrake9130]

@@jakehickox7275 I know you didn't say the Creator was made of matter And, I didn't say you said it. My question is not a red herring, since you are suggesting that matter can't create itself, therefore it must have a creator. If this Creator is made of matter, then by the argument you are presenting, it also must have a creator.

[@RobertA-oi6hw]

Very interested to see where this is going! Good job AIG.

[@sgt.grinch3299]

Thanks for sharing your knowledge.

[@nathanmcbride1177]

Lying is not sharing knowledge.

[@nathanmcbride1177]

@Σά ββας op comment you goon

[@voiceofrezn]

Pet peeves: "Fold" is not the same "Times " - 4 Fold is NOT the same as 4 Times, but these words are often used as synonyms...errantly. From the number 2, 4-fold is 32...from 2 to 4, 8, 16, 32 -- 4 FOLD. 2 TIMES 4 is 8. Quite a difference, which difference grows greatly as one progresses...to 10 FOLDS, for instance.

[@lawrencejones1237]

fold - suffix . "having the stated number of parts, or multiplied by the stated number of times". The word in this usage is never plural. It's not 10 folds. It's tenfold.

[@mdemst]

I know this is out of scope for the case you are building here, a positive case. However, it could easily be argued that evolution creating new species at a rate that combats and overcomes rate of extinction, is unprovable. Not to mention, can science show a single, testable, repeatable example of evolution writing new genetic code?

[@Jewonastick]

Absolutely. Do you chihuahuas have the exact same generic code as wolves?

[@shannaconda3434]

​@@Jewonastick It's not a completely new genetic code! Tell me, would Chihuahuas exist without the existence of wolves?

[@yiqingwang1437]

Has anyone been able to test Darwain evolution by the same standards 🤔

[@dancingnature]

Of course, evolution has been tested , that’s why it’s accepted as an accurate description of nature by the international scientific community and is actually used in medical research! Creationists are just in denial

[@yiqingwang1437]

@@dancingnature How it can be tested for Darwain evolution took millions of years. Are you sure you understand my OP? I don't deny mutation. But it is simply impossible to test Darwain evolution because of the time required.

[@imafeltersnatch7634]

@@yiqingwang1437 Firstly there's no such thing as "Darwin evolution ". Evolution is a field of science. Evolution is a Scientific The based on the Scientific Method. So it's a self correcting method of research. It would help you immensely if you actually knew what you were trying to argue against

[@yiqingwang1437]

@@imafeltersnatch7634 Please Define scientific methods. My understanding is that it is built upon OBSERVATION AND EXPERIMENTS. As for Darwainian evolution, it is regarding the common ancestor through mutation and natural selection. Where's your scientific evidence for that? Oh, please provide me the scientific evidence of how intelligence came from non intelligence.

[@travisbicklepopsicle]

@@yiqingwang1437 it doesn't take millions of years to test evolution. Any change in the inherited traits or characteristics of a population of organisms through successive generations is biological evolution. There's an entire scientific theory built around the facts of evolution. Do you know the definition of *scientific theory*?

[@allenhunt3070]

Excellent beginning on background scientific studies. Looking forward to the rest of the series!

[@Zebhammer]

Fascinating. Especially the lengths conventional, evolutionary scientists will go to in order to preserve their precious belief. It reminds me of Copernicus and Galileo who got into trouble for different reasons, not so much with the church, an accusation by many atheists, but rather with the scientific establishment of the day who were allied with the church of Rome.

[@debragrubbs1038]

How to order this book?

[@answersingenesis]

answersingenesis.org/store/product/traced/

[@feedingravens]

And all the advertisement for the books - well, money has to come in.

[@hennyberends8521]

We can see who is doing real science and who's doing 'interpretive science. Thanks Dr Jeanson for sharing your careful research with us.

[@billjohnson9472]

his research argues that the earth is much older than previously thought. because of the mutation rates it would take much longer to see the mutations that we have. so it is not clear how that supports any theory of creation.

[@jerrylong6238]

@@billjohnson9472 Creation is not a theory, its hogwash.

[@stacey-leehattingh6957]

Hey there. Before i watch this, what is the difference between these new episodes and the history of human race (26 episodes) one that was done on this channel

[@maxpeck1962]

The 26 part series was done before the book Traced, early in the research. This current series reflects more recent data and discoveries after Traced was published.

[@stacey-leehattingh6957]

@@maxpeck1962 thank you so much for the feedback :) shalom

[@danmannz]

This is so in my camp! I know that there is probably normal people that watch this! but come on!? I'm willing to take a bet that a lot of people (like me) that watch this stuff that actually care and are deeply invested in this subject are totally on the spectrum haha. I totally think that the best "celebrity" normal open person to persuade that really would help dig a big blow in all of this is Mikhaila Peterson. Do I have another amen? oh?! there are so many reasons!

[@anselman3156]

Might she persuade her father?

[@jameshale6401]

To paraphrase from a 3s company epp Creation is cake with lots of layers Evo is all icing

[@texastexas4541]

I am convinced. our earth is only 6,006 years old. Please publish this in journals and participate in science meetings to teach other scientists. If you refuse to do that by giving excuses of many kinds, then you are preaching to the choir.

[@shannaconda3434]

Well, try getting it published in science journals and see what kind of pushback you get and from who.

[@texastexas4541]

@@shannaconda3434 You wait and see, bro. These scientists from the Christian universities are busy preparing this manuscript as we speak. It is only a matter of time before it gets published in Science, Nature and all the top journals across the globe and all universities will abandon biology and theory of evolution in favor of Genesis story.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@texastexas4541 This sounds like the second coming of Christ It aint gonna happen

[@texastexas4541]

@@captaingaza2389 That manuscript will be published when the time is right. I am convinced President Trump will publish it in Nature and Science once he is reinstated.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@texastexas4541 LOL!!!

[@csmoviles]

🙏💖🙏💖🙏💖

[@noobsaibot5285]

Great name

[@luisdasilva3879]

do we need more scientific research than to see that creation is indisputably a fact ? I don't think so .

[@quickattackfilms7923]

Could you guys do a study where you just keep going over the DNA sequence over and over and over again until the errors are all uncovered? Then you can sort of establish a standard for how many times we ought to go over the sequence to weed out errors.

[@ReRe-yl6dq]

if the evolutionists are only allowing data out that fits their narrative then shouldn't the creation scientists do their own Y chromosome mutation rate study?

[@roger-bp1nr]

I really enjoy your work. Keep it up! Looking forward to future discoveries.

[@roger-bp1nr]

@@therick363 I suspect you're just a skeptic but in the chance that you're sincere I recommend checking out Dr. Jeanson's other videos.

[@eddyeldridge7427]

@@roger-bp1nr Its very telling how you think skepticism is a bad thing.

[@Akapickles]

What would be some possible causes of a faster mutation rate? Could there be one or two significant mutations and then normalizing to approximately 3? e.g. 30 mutations in one generation making it appear as it’ll it were 10 generations and then back to 3 mutations in the following generation.

[@tommycapps9903]

Because if there is no creation their can't be any evolution. There must be a place for evolution to take place, right? A system that is suitable for evolution progression. That seems to be pretty obvious.

[@SimpleAmadeus]

Very exciting! If you are right, which appears to be the case, then any further advances in this field will surely not make it possible to deny the fast mutation rate for much longer. Evolutionists would either have to botch up their own numbers over and over to match their conclusion, completely ruining their ability to explore any new data, or they would have to declare the very concept of DNA studies as a whole to be pseudoscience. Both of those options seem untenable.

[@feedingravens]

Hmmm... as far as I know, when you join Answers in Genesis in ANY position, you have to sign a document where you commit yourself to NEVER say anything that is contradicting the claim that the Bible is LITERALLY true. After all, AiG makes his money SOLELY with that claim. It should give you to think that AiG denies the possibility that genetic diversification is possible over long times, but as their Ark story makes it unavoidable that a few thousands of nebulous, undefined "kinds" spread from one single point on earth all over the world, and at the same time diversify into thousands and thousands of species (with insects or worms we are in the millions), not leaving any trace of the path of thousands of miles where they diversified, So AiG says a super-duper-hyper-ultra-fast evolution it what the science supports. then there is the necessity (because Ken Ham wanted them on his ark) that you also lose species because there were dozens of dinosaur kinds (some of them fire-breathing like dragons) on the ark to die out a few hundred years later. Sorry, but normally science works that you observe what is in nature and then try for an explanation that fits best. And when you have a new idea that fits decidedly better to the observations, then this will be taken over after it has proven its value. For Creationism it is "What we say is true in our 2000 year old book is the ONLY possible explanation, and we will go and search to make up somthing that fits to our preconceived conclusion.". And it is not so that even though the claim is that the Bible is LITERALLY true throughout. Most flat earthers are religious and base their unmovable conviction on a handful of Bible verses. Christian apologists like Rob Skiba specialized on Flat Earth, and he gave his life for Covid denial due to religious reasons. Ken Ham says these are all idiots, God created the universe as is, with a heliocentric solar system and a globe. Spreding such christian messages pays off, the US religious industry makes 150 billions/year - tax-free.

[@SimpleAmadeus]

​@@feedingravens Your argument assumes that these people get their conclusion based on a group they join. It's the opposite. They join this group based on their conclusions. You're also attempting a sloppy equivocation between AiG and "the entirety of science" which does not make any sense. The argument they present is not "it is true because the bible says so". The argument presented here is that the DNA evidence strongly supports the biblical account, and that the secular-naturalist theory is incompatible with the observable evidence. You have not engaged with the evidence at all. Everything you said is based on your own tribal thinking. This is not only fallacious, but also hypocritical, since that is exactly what you're accusing AiG of.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@SimpleAmadeus Nope Non of these “scientists” have published any of their work for peer review They don’t because they lack empirical evidence Their whole premise is It’s true because I say it’s true And because they don’t have empirical evidence to support their claims they do what they do best Tell LIES. Lots and lots of LIES!!!

[@SimpleAmadeus]

@@captaingaza2389 Not an argument.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@SimpleAmadeus Not a valid response That what can be asserted without evidence can be be dismissed without evidence

[@terranceramirez4816]

27:05 that’s called burying the lede in journalistic speak

[@watchman2866]

When you do the critic's section deal with the evolutionist, then can you address the books of Joshua Swamidas and William Lane Craig exclusively when you deal with your critics? Because evolutionist is one thing but it's another when the attacks come from within.

[@Mellownius]

All attacks will come from within as numerous biblical and Biblical Hebrew scholars are not born again Christins nor do they believe in God …

[@watchman2866]

@@Mellownius True, but Mr. Swamidass and Mr. Craig are Christians. However, I wouldn't want the conversation to be about the individuals but the data presented.

[@222ableVelo]

Yes I was disappointed/sad to hear that Dr. Craig believes in evolution. I do not doubt his salvation or his claim as a Christian. But, as intelligent as he is, I would have thought he would know better.

[@drinno8900]

At 30:40 the DNA altering during copying I would love to test if a Christian families in wedlock may delete damaged or repair throwback to original mutations due to spiritual renewal. They say increase of mutations maybe caused by environment, disease, radiation exposure to sun or the age of father at conception. Wonder if healing and forgiveness through Christ is measurable in our DNA.

[@TheWadetube]

Believe me I appreciate anybody who can talk over my head. I am glad that a creation scientist knows how to break down DNA studies like this. Each team should review each others literature. I am a critic of evolutionary logic and data and , well, everything. I also am critical of young earth creationists holding strong to a translation of the Hebrew word for "Day" being Yom which also means Epoch and "age" and a thousand years but consider because the heaven's and the earth are already created before the first evening. What was that evening? When light came forth from the sun. As the sun is forming or BEING formed it will take a lot of compressing and build up for it to ignite. Young earth creationists insist that GOD HAD to create the whole universe in a few hours. and a few hours after that the sun ignited and made the first light for day .

[@shannaconda3434]

Well, if you were programming a video game from outside the platform that you were going to play the game on, you could create it in any order you wanted and put it all online at one time. You wouldn't necessarily be subject to the rules of the environment that you created and you could manipulate anything inside that creation at any time you wanted and place it at any point in the game that you wanted because you created and and can see the beginning middle and end all at once. Time is a dimension withing our universe. Who knows what rules and laws exists outside of our universe.

[@TheWadetube]

@@shannaconda3434 Exactly, as a creator would do, lay the groundwork according to a plan, perhaps one used many times all over the galaxy, the order in which to seed life and what kind. Bees and flowers together, for instance, live birth and breasts and breastmilk and the reflex to succle all at once. Once your game is complete you are in charge and can effect the rules. Bring back the dead, stop sickness in it's tracs, regrow limbs, restore sight to the blind, walk on water and even stop the wind from blowing with a rebuke. Sounds like the matrix to me. But NOTHING like what evolution has to offer.

[@garywilson7992]

@@shannaconda3434 absolutely, God created time, and the physical realm that he was completely outside of, that hadn’t yet existed, and so he also created the the natural laws that govern the physical realm. But it always amazes me , in that even sincere devout believers who seem to want to believe that God is hindered and restricted in his creative Powers by the very laws that he created. And so it’s never been an obstacle to me, as if I was committing intellectual suicide, by only believing what I wanted to believe, that God only took six days to create the physical realm. Because that’s what he said, and it’s not some misunderstanding, as if that’s not what he really meant. And he wouldn’t even have needed six days and a day of rest if that had been his choice. But it’s so interesting for those who have looked into it a little deeper, for the reason’s of why he chose the number seven.

[@danmannz]

Yes! We need to abolish the FED with a new 2.0 gold standard, (crypto backed by gold but is private?)

[@KenJackson_US]

You sound like a good free market guy, Dan. So why do you have an icon that looks like Che?

[@danmannz]

@@KenJackson_US Beautiful. Exactly! because I'm an online troll that loves the truth? are you aware of the NPC meme? I'm basically trolling leftists that are a bunch of idealogues that don't think so much.

[@seanvogel8067]

You are weird

[@anonymousone2843]

How ridiculous. These trolls and algorithms need to have a human eye to check the content of where they put their nonsense. The words "gold standard" appear in a title and out comes the troll comments. Do we still meed more proof that humans are superior to machines?! God Bless 🥰

[@sarahs3980]

I have always heard that a woman is born with her eggs. Interesting to learn that they are produced at puberty! I wonder why they used to think we were born with them. Interesting to learn that they are produced at puberty! I wonder why they used to think we were born with them

[@psychtrane]

I would strongly recommending the video "Book Review: "Traced" by Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson" by KZbinr "Creation Myths" for an example of how a non-creationist scientist responds to this book.

[@maxpeck1962]

Jeanson will likely respond to that review in later videos in this series. There was already an impromptu debate between Jeanson and the CreationMyths guy on some apologetics open forum podcast. The critic did not offer anything convincing and I thought Jeanson defended his position quite well. Based on another video of his, CreationMyths has no problem resorting to blatant lies and/or grossly taking things out of context to mock creation scientists. It was shameful.

[@psychtrane]

"Jeanson defended his position quite well"? Sure, right, if you say so. LOL.

[@maxpeck1962]

@@psychtrane Listen for yourself. It's free on youtube.

[@joelebert9767]

@@psychtrane You didn't see that one?

[@psychtrane]

@@joelebert9767 The man is a buffoon. Any scientifically literate person can see that. Of course, there are lots of illiterates out there for him to fleece.....

[@tonycarreira3793]

truth

[@markdoherty9205]

Can I ask. This critics work carried out by others, generally in an attempt to destroy the content and reliability of it. Has similar investment been made to prove your position.

[@BrandonGray]

Canaan is also Noah son through the relationship of Ham and Noah's wife

[@tommycapps9903]

The problem with what the Judge said is that you can’t falsify evolution belief on how the world began to be, how time came to exist, how material things can come from nothing.

[@feedingravens]

Because all that you list is ONLY part of the Creationist strawman of evolution. Evolution as science has the field of LIVING beings adapting to their environment. NOTHING else. You list Cosmology, where the Big Bang is a part of. This current hypothesis is based on our known physics being able to work backwards until less than a billionth of a second after the Big Bang. And we constanty learn new details, new effects. And when enough counterarguments are found, and a BETTER explanation is found, than the Big Bang will be replaced. Like a static universe was replaced as space expands. As said, our universal laws of physics work for the whole 13.7 billion years to arrive at our universe. What is before this billionth of a second is hard to say, as our known universal physics do not work anymore. Cosmologists try various ideas, but none of them is really persuasive and it is hard to say something before the space and time we know and can handle existed. When you want to insert God into that billionth of a second, be my guest. But it brings nothing beyond emotional consolation. "Goddidit" explains NOTHING. it is just a placeholder for "I don't know" and as God's ways are inscrutable, it terminates curiosity. And this prime mover does not help you, because after that he is not required anymore to explain how the universe proceeded. And especially it does not console the Christians most important longing, that they are SPECIAL. That God has created the whole universe ONLY for them, and now watches us 24/7 and reads our every thought, so obsessed is he by us. Or are you content with a prime mover that did do nothing after that (ecen though apologists usually concentrate on that, on a nebulous, featureless entity instead of the Strict Father in the Sky that watches us)? Abiogenesis is also a seperate branch, while evolution is handling mainly genetics, abiogenesis is more physics and chemistry, how anorganic molecules are forming into organic molecules. Creationism is not going beyond Miller-Urey from the 1950s. In the meantime we e.g know that on the early earth it is pretty probable that there were water puddles in clay surfaces, and these clay surfaces have a somewhat catalytic effect so that on this surface naturally forming amino acids can form long strands. That is more or less an RNA molecule, and these molecules have the property that they can make copies of themselves. RNA is a predecessor of DNA. And another effect of these molecules is that they have one side where naturally occuring lipid molecules can attach, protecting the RNA strand against being broken up. That is a more or less useless molecule, having no real functionality, but the basic structure is the same as that of life. And an interesting effect is that a lot of rather primitive, old organisms have an enourmous amount of highly repetitive genetic information, as if you have random combinations by the millions until some sections got some (beneficial) functionality. And later the genetic code became more efficient, following th KIS prinsiple (Keep it simple). That is pure physics and chemistry, all the ingredients are everywhere, even in space. And pwople constantly learn, find new effects. I always get super-suspicious when people resort to rhethorical trickery to "prove" their point. Strawmanning is one of them. Then cherrypicking and quotemining, just picking out some half-sentence from something, relying that the fellowship will never check for themselves that the complete context says the opposite. Like Darwin's famous "The eye is to perfect to be formed by chance" that Creationists quote. and would you read on, there is a page-long argumentation that even though it SEEMS that way, the properties and the developmental steps make it unavoidable for almost pastor Darwin that the eye has evolved. Then you will find the gishgallop, that people throw out dozens of claims in five minutes, each one requiring 5 minutes why this is incorrect, no problem, and when the other did not make it to debunk ALL claims, but does not get to one or two, the Creationist will immediately triumph "See? Evolution has no answer for that! We WON!!!" Then you will find an enormous amount of deflection, that instead of answering to a concrete issue of THEIR viewpoint, they just ignore it and start returning to poking holes in the other side. And you cannot insist to have your question answered, then they will claim immediately "see, he has no answer to our killer gotchas, therefore he is bickering".

[@captaingaza2389]

You most certainly can falsify evolution It’s simple Find a bunny fossil in the Cambrian

[@philhart4849]

What has evolution got to do with how the world began?

[@Max-kn9yi]

Does the new book explain why African males change in the Y chromosome is so much faster?

[@philipbuckley759]

how anyone can believe in Darwin, is a mystery, to me.....unless one asserts the reason is that the alternative, creation, is just too much...ie the judgement of a higher power....

[@Avigdor1655]

6 protons 6 electrons 6 neutrons making carbon-12 the make up of man. And all life on this world and in this world.

[@anyone9689]

where is his nobel prize?? book reviews poorly by real scientific community .

[@maxpeck1962]

I wouldn't expect a Russian soldier to have a Purple Heart, nor a US soldier to have an Order of Lenin. Why would you expect a creationist to have an award that is controlled by those who follow the evolutionist religion? Sounds like a classic "no true Scotsman" fallacy to claim only evolutionist science is "real" science.

[@kyloooooo]

yes, a really biased 'scientific' community. They don't like it when their deep-rooted evolution religious beliefs are challenged.

[@shannaconda3434]

The Nobel society is a fucking farce! Obama was given a Nobel peace prize upon entering the office of Potus. Having don't NOTHING! That tells me how legitimate the Nobel is.

[@raineeredman9614]

After hearing what you said...I have officially come to the conclusion that Evolution Science is a religion flat out. It is as belief system that "believes"in a theory...Scientist that h as ve" faith " in scientific guestimate on how we began...I think it takes a whole lot more "faith" to believe we all came into existence by a huge accident in the utopia of nothing...than to believe God created EVERYTHING.

[@oldedwardian1778]

OK, it’s a religion, are you satisfied now? Have you achieved anything? Evolution is a RELIGION, like no other, the Religion of EVOLUTION is based on KNOWLEDGE, RESEARCH and REASON. Now let’s look at the Religion of Christianity, which is based on MYTH, IGNORANCE, BLIND BELIEF, ETERNAL PUNISHMENT FOR BREAKING THE RULES. REFUSAL TO ALLOW INVESTIGATION AND REFUSAL TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE MOUNTAIN OF CONTRADICTIONS AND STRAIGHT UP LIES. Hmm, SCIENCE doesn’t seem to fit the same description as Christianity. Science admits that it does not have all the answers and when Science recognizes it has made a mistake then SCIENCE ADMITS ITS MISTAKE AND RENEWS THE RESEARCH TO FIND THE TRUTH. Oh yes admitting mistakes is also known as TELLING THE TRUTH. Just tell me ONE VERIFIABLE TRUTH IN CHRISTIANITY, JUST ONE WILL DO.

[@johannesstephanusroos4969]

@@endersdragon34 Hahahaha, good one

[@Jewonastick]

Love how you say it's a religion as if a religion is a bad thing..... Well, at least we agree on that

[@oldedwardian1778]

@@Jewonastick I was being SARCASTIC, SCIENCE IS BASED ON TRUTH AND EVIDENCE, ATHEISM USES THE SAME CRITERIA, unlike religion which is pure FICTION. That is what MATTERS you can classify IS IT ANY WAY YOUR LITTLE HEART DESIRES, what ever you want to call it. As I said what matters is TRUTH. We atheists keep asking the same question, WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT GODS EXIST and NO the Bible is NOT evidence, the Bible is just another deeply flawed mixture of Folk lore, Fairy Tales, historical accounts and BULLSHIT. So I say again for the BILLIONTH TIME, if your god exists then PROVE IT.

[@oldedwardian1778]

@@Jewonastick Oh sorry, I realized that your comments is NOT clear, but you may in fact be agreeing with me on the subject of the existence of god. If so then I am preaching to the converted.

[@lawnmowerman716]

Really appreciate this man’s work but he has to be more concise. His videos are too long and too much detail. Just give conclusions snd where we can find more. Videos should be shareable and none are. Just trying to help

[@michaelbrett3749]

What i want to know is can we trace humans back to Mt Ararat or at least the Turkey area rather that the evolutionary idea that we came out of Africa, or does the 2000 years of DNA in Noah previous to the the flood take us to the garden presumably in Iraq?

[@captaingaza2389]

DNA confirms none of that ever happened

[@michaelbrett3749]

@@captaingaza2389 Gaza .... DNA is a genetic code not a history book . You don't want to believe that's your belief stick with your belief and hold onto your belief even if your proved wrong your belief belongs to you.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@michaelbrett3749 It’s not about belief It’s about evidence Our DNA is ancient, that’s what the evidence tells us

[@michaelbrett3749]

@@captaingaza2389 Your evidence of DNA vs my evidence of DNA

[@captaingaza2389]

@@michaelbrett3749 Not mine, no The scientific community’s that has been thoroughly investigated and documented based on observations and experiments I doubt your evidence is scientific but it’s yours non the less

[@garywilson7992]

I know it sounds like I’m over simplifying things, but I have no doubt that what I’m saying is absolutely true. And that is to say, that this is a debate in hopeless complete futility, because there’s no amount of evidence, no matter how profound, how solid, and how much, that would ever be enough for them to change their minds about their ideological evolutionary and atheistic religion.

[@captaingaza2389]

@@garywilson7992 Nope The science of evolution deals with empirical evidence No belief required Creationists LIE because that’s all they have left to defend their deluded nonsense, LIES!!! Lots and lots of LIES!!!