Reminds me of the "hot dogs" deck that used to be popular in pauper. Who ever names this needs to call it Hot wings
@carsonbos4722 ай бұрын
That name idea is awesome, bravo
@ctbarnum37922 ай бұрын
wooded foothills + Prismatic vista = 7 fetches that get mountain or forest
@Kryptnyt2 ай бұрын
Think the idea might be that every land has to be able to cast Fireblast so basic forest in a way is a no-go
@MyNameIsAlph2 ай бұрын
Love when decks get to do their thing in the first game, doubly so when its quite as spectacular as that first game
@AaronRotenberg2 ай бұрын
I love how both you and BoshNRoll immediately forget the name of that card as soon as it leaves the screen. You know, the, uh... Slickdog Sureshuck.
@ThrabenUniversity2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Kryptnyt2 ай бұрын
Put some respect on Smugshit Sherriff's name
@ReyaadawnMTG2 ай бұрын
As someone who play Death's Shadow + Berserk 10+ years ago, I love this deck!
@kyleucf2 ай бұрын
Bauble delay draw is too slow imo. Cut the 8 baubles and petals for 4 Rite of flame and 4 manamorphose. Add land grant as well. That’s where I would start.
@Ph3xian2 ай бұрын
Land Grant should be great
@keithbarlow97012 ай бұрын
Land Grant does seem like it's worth trying out.
@apocalypsecod2 ай бұрын
Land grant would be pretty spicy here.
@danielhall90502 ай бұрын
Land grant is a really good idea! The baubles seem kinda necessary for DRC, maybe trim some and go up in petals for artifact type? I think manamorphose might be too expensive but it does cycle
@kyleucf2 ай бұрын
@@danielhall9050 yea I’m not 100% convinced DRC is actually a sacred cow here. Probably still the best threat after the haste guys but unsure. You could do something like 2 bauble, 2 petal, 2 tarfire or something like that if you are really worried about delerium but you do have a pretty good mix of the main for types to hit on. Seek the beast is another option for threats.
@studentanselmus94612 ай бұрын
At 49:50, Lightning Bolt is not a concern, but didn't they just get the Fireblast you cast under their Voidwalker? Grief attack plus Fireblast would have been lethal.
@nadavperry22672 ай бұрын
hmmm, yeah guess they both missed that.
@dragemit2 ай бұрын
i also thought this. curious if there is a reason they couldn't?
@kurii-2 ай бұрын
Came to say the same thing.
@smoki1022 ай бұрын
yeep, was also thinking of that
@silphonym2 ай бұрын
so actually, for this reason would the correct line have been to swing, not cast the fireblast, go to one presumably, and then attack the following turn +fireblast? or should the fireblast be used to kill dauthi and get the opponent to five?
@OctupleThreat2 ай бұрын
49:55 you were dead on board and opponent didn't see the out. Grief hits for 3 and then Dauthi casts a free Fireblast for exact lethal!
@alexanderlewis9582 ай бұрын
I think the mindbreak trap was a mistake for the opponent in round 3. Mindbreak trap is fine against any deck looking to cast many impactful spells in a turn, but prowess is not really one of those decks. The creatures are what matter, then casting spells, but those spells don't really matter much individually. Also hurting their mana by playing a blue card instead of literally any red card for chrome mox was a big deal in game 2.
@AaronRotenberg2 ай бұрын
Rule of Law effects, on the other hand, can be very good against Prowess. I suspect the opponent just had Mindbreak Trap lumped together in their head with those and boarded it in without thinking about it enough to realize it doesn't really work that well.
@silphonym2 ай бұрын
I think there is a little more nuance here, but you're probably right overall. I would add that specifically Berserk could be answered with it, and it was quite unlikely and unlucky that it became public information due to bauble.
@oweneaston31212 ай бұрын
This has been basically my list for legacy nights for a while now, I have switched up a little to add brainstorm and ponder instead of the hyper burn elements. Thanks for showcasing something I didn’t know others were playing!
@fel_952 ай бұрын
49:42 couldn't opponent attack with Grief, and use Fireblast off Dauthi to win?
@gius80682 ай бұрын
I think so too, it seems they missed the line
@WilhelmScreamer2 ай бұрын
God I love watching decks that test when its time to go full leadfoot
@jadegrace13122 ай бұрын
53:50 you did have outs involving light up the stage. It was very very unlikely though so I don't blame you for scooping.
@p1k4nurxp13sr2 ай бұрын
He brings out a pimp named slickshot
@crucible_of_words2 ай бұрын
I played with an Izzet version that felt pretty tasty.
@USVTechnikum2 ай бұрын
19:00 bully Phil is best Phil
@RumpledNutskin2 ай бұрын
I'm so happy you got to do the thing in the very first game 😂 I love berserk so much
@olafthemoose94132 ай бұрын
Could play 4 prismatic vista 4 wooded foothills 1 taiga 1 forest
@samberry89172 ай бұрын
Was there any thought to playing Lava Dart or is that more of a Modern card?
@JacoDeltaco2 ай бұрын
I cannot belive it took so long for you to play Slikshot
@alexvalentim14182 ай бұрын
19:00 Maniacal laugh is for the ages
@projectphyrexia2 ай бұрын
in the very last round of the last game when you conceded, in theory, if i'm not missing something, u could've cast slickshot and just thrown it infront of murktide with mutagenics through force of negation. as long as they tap out wasteland twice to not cut the price of progress damage AND deploy another land AND fail to have further interaction, there was a chance xD
@alexortiz97772 ай бұрын
15:50 am I missing something about bolt+gut shot here? They're on 5 life
@Jeremy-gy7me2 ай бұрын
They would have to force one of the bolts, which costs 1 life.
@swampybwoy2 ай бұрын
18:53 evil Phil laugh
@Buutyful2 ай бұрын
out all the bubbles for rite of flames
@papernes2 ай бұрын
With 13 lands, the MH2 card would’ve been really good. The one mana call land or non land and reveal until you hit whatever you called. Someone will know the name.
@alexortiz97772 ай бұрын
Abundant Harvest but I dont see how its good here
@amaru13612 ай бұрын
i want to play W/R ocelot soul sisters when mh3 drops. got a list ready for mtgo testing.
@colinjones53792 ай бұрын
Hell yeah, now this is some cowboy magic
@kevink.88092 ай бұрын
This deck is my shot of whiskey 🤠🤠🤠
@wowmafkees2 ай бұрын
Are plotted cards face up exiled?
@SindarinElealarАй бұрын
@49:42 Couldn't the opponent just Fireblast you wtih Dauthi and kill with Grief? O.o I think casting Fireblast there before lethal is definitely a mistake.
@austinroy-stewart12682 ай бұрын
Burn feels pretty good in the current legacy scene, especially if you don't have to fight against combo which seems like a bad MU. This deck gets a thumbs up from me
@persydiangelo84612 ай бұрын
In round 3, game 1, if I'm not mistaken, you can cast berserk at sorcery speed on the opponents tapped Broadside Bombardiers and make them sac it at the end of turn right? That way you don't end up taking extra damage.
@twodo2 ай бұрын
Has to attack and has to be cast before damage
@jasonslade62592 ай бұрын
Berserk has a really weird timing restriction where you can only cast it during the combat damage setp.
@spicyunicornmilkfarmer2 ай бұрын
If you want to kill a creature with Berserk, you can casr it in second main. The end step trigger will still resolve because it attacked this turn. You don't have to take double damage from the creature you buff.
@lonewolf9752 ай бұрын
First line of text of berserk says cast only before the combat damage step
@ThrabenUniversity2 ай бұрын
Please reread Berserk.
@jaojintalonis922 ай бұрын
6:44 "There's no nuance to this sideboard" 47:15 - "Unsure, need to see a little more of the deck to kind of sus out the nuances." [about sideboarding] 🤔😄
@SkeletonsYouControlHaveHaste2 ай бұрын
Woah your name changed to DB thrabenU?! What happened to Madea Magica?!
@ThrabenUniversity2 ай бұрын
I have two accounts. One is for the creator program.
@freya002YT2 ай бұрын
Nice
@SkeletonsYouControlHaveHaste2 ай бұрын
"Good job playing to your outs" Doesn't play to his outs, I wanted to see what would happen in that final round, It takes you 15 seconds to just see what happens. Never know, opponent could just draw lands the rest of the game and we win. Otherwise phenomenal video!
@GlichCentral2 ай бұрын
Video being an hour long for such an aggressive deck is mildly concerning, hopefully doesn’t mean it just lost a bunch of games.
@Magnivore5192 ай бұрын
In round 3, you could have Berserked the Broadside on your turn to kill it during your turn.
@Konradexius2 ай бұрын
Berserk only kills if the creature attacks
@jaytdl90412 ай бұрын
Correct but it's still considered attacking in damage after taking two, so it was possible to save two life by casting it in damage.
@dragemit2 ай бұрын
berserk only kills a creature if it attacked that turn
@ThrabenUniversity2 ай бұрын
Please reread Berserk.
@ThrabenUniversity2 ай бұрын
Please reread Berserk.
@andrewshuman68512 ай бұрын
Round 1 Match 2 the final turn burn sequencing is objectively not the optimal line. It should be Lightening Bolt to draw out the FoW and take the opponent down to 4, then follow up with Lightening Bolt and Gutshot to finish them off.
@cdadamly2 ай бұрын
This is debatable since the opponent draws a card for each spell that targets due to Leovold. That is what Phil was mulling over.
@andrewshuman68512 ай бұрын
@@cdadamly Two cards in hand are more powerful and can be played around rather than 2 cards from the top of the deck.
@Konradexius2 ай бұрын
So, you agree your initial statement is wrong?
@andrewshuman68512 ай бұрын
@@Konradexius No
@fartface89182 ай бұрын
The word objectively is a insanely huge fault point in your statement, it's not even like intrinsically wrong to say your line would be better but Leovold very clearly makes it not clear the bar of objectively better