Thornhill's POV: Gravitational Waves | Thunderbolts

[@jlsmithling]

Thanks to all the people who took the time to put this together.

[@scottwdavis193]

Wal taught me the true mechanical nature of the universe I live in.

[@PaulaHawk99]

Wal Thornhill ♥️

[@Flame-Bright-Cheer]

I think it's really cool that we still get to hear his thoughts and I think this narrator is doing a perfect job

[@davejones7632]

......was an utterly clueless mythologist.

[@benwinter2420]

@@davejones7632 What is myth ?

[@davejones7632]

@@benwinter2420 Made up fairy tales.

[@PaxAlotin]

*Q* ------- What is Gravity ? *A* ------- We don't know - but we found it's 'Gravy waves'

[@EnergyTRE]

Q what's gravity= mutual mass acceleration 🤌👍 that's craps been known for some time now. Just they aren't going to tell you its a Æther modality and like all Æther modalities there is a way to negate it. 😂

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

did you mean to type "it's"? Here the difference materially alters the meaning of your post.

[@PaxAlotin]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Well spotted. Yes it was intentional. The 'Gravy Waves' belong to the aforementioned Gravity. 🙂

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@PaxAlotin but then you meant _its,_ right?

[@kazunorimiura3526]

LIGO received SLF generated by earthquakes. SLF is a type of radio wave that cannot be blocked and has a very long wavelength that occurs during earthquakes. It was observed simultaneously in two places because it was radio waves. When looking at the data of events that are considered to be gravitational waves, in most cases, there is an earthquake nearby.

[@mcnaugha]

They conveniently found gamma ray emissions from at least one of the sources at the right amount of time to claim the speed of gravity must be close to or equal to the speed of light. I would have thought that what they’re detecting is the merger of plasmoids. Everywhere they think there is a black hole, neutron star or magnetar is actually a plasmoid. Ones that obviously vary in charge density and magnitude. These things merge and a burst of electromagnetic waves isn’t exactly a surprise.

[@davejones7632]

_"When looking at the data of events that are considered to be gravitational waves, in most cases, there is an earthquake nearby."_ Nope, you made that up.

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@davejones7632lol, I find it so amusing that you spend so much time here 😂

[@davejones7632]

@@Kaimelar8 What I find amusing is the rubbish that some people fall for on the internet. Particularly the type of transparent BS that people like Thornhill peddled. Did anyone ever think to ask him for a follow-up piece when the gravitational waves and simultaneous EM signature was received from the binary neutron star merger in 2017? How did he explain that? How did it affect his silly claim that gravity acts instantaneously (lol)? He didn't even try. He just ignored it because it showed him to be wrong. To the surprise of nobody. Just as he did with a piece he wrote on the then upcoming mission to the comet Hartley 2 in 2010. All the usual impossible nonsense about comets, but not a peep from him when the main news from that mission, a literal snowstorm of ice around the comet, was reported. It didn't fit his narrative, so he just ignored it. And then his non-existent electrical flash (lol) at Tempel 1 in 2005. Pretended that it happened, when he knew damned well that it didn't. So, don't you think it is amusing that people fall for such nonsense, when a few minutes research would show it to be trivially wrong?

[@concettaworkman5895]

RIP, Wal. I cried when you died. You changed my life.

[@JammaLamma]

🙏same here 😭 aloha bro

[@summerbrooks9922]

Such a meaningless death, too. Like out of nowhere in a violent scene, a bullet found him although he was not a part of this violent storm. Dear God, why?

[@barbmiracle]

@@summerbrooks9922 Likely because he was pointing at the man behind the curtain.

[@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858]

How did he die ?

[@cajampa]

@@anhumblemessengerofthelawo3858 Yeah I am wondering the same. I tried a quick search but failed to find those details

[@laurah1020]

Very timely release…thank you all involved in getting it out!💕

[@andrew4451]

Your videos are excellent.

[@floatingbonestaichi]

Wal Thornhill may have passed on, yet his work, his humble and humanizing brilliance, remains like a beacon of light through the darkness. Thank you Wal, and Rest in Peace.

[@davejones7632]

He doesn't have any 'work'. Just pseudoscientific gibberish on youtube and crackpot websites.

[@StanJan]

Thornhill was incredible. His words will echo in the minds of all that can see through the smoke.... Thank you for keeping his fight for science alive. Stan

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

I think his words echo in the minds of all that indulge in the smoke...

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x when you perceive your speech as a schizophrenic

[@talonthorn]

I've got a good one for you: Gravitation waves, and usually just says "goodbye."

[@TheSelf_8]

Proper title would be The Myth of Gravitational Waves

[@raycar1165]

That would take away from the word myth. 😉

[@jamesweninger3679]

Gravitational waves ARE a real thing. Einstein’s ideas wrong, no doubt, but the ideas of gravity as originally proposed by Newton, De Duillier, and LeSage, all predicted gravity waves. They are real.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@raycar1165 Yes, impossible myths about planets colliding are "true" here, so calling something that actually exists a myth loses its sting a bit.

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@jamesweninger3679 Gravitational waves would be the warping of distances;-) Nonsens;-)

[@raycar1165]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x @physicswithpark3r-x3x you’ve missed the mark, who said anything about colliding planets. That’s the Standard Model. The Electric Universe Model as far as I’m aware, only has one force and it’s balanced. The attraction of two near celestial bodies will repel when their charge is equalized, they will not crash into each other. A discharge will happen at the shortest distance between the two bodies. This is why in the myths, it was said that the gods (planets) of the ancient world used thunderbolts as weapons. These are the destructive cataclysmic events which reshaped the landscape. Depending upon the vector of the alignment and the direction of rotation and the difference between charges, it could leave a long scar like the Grand Canyon or a single point, like the Eye of the Sahara. See Bidwell’s Bee The joke is … like most modern things, society today is doing it backwards. For most of history Myth meant spoken. True story. Until it was corrupted to mean fiction in the 1840’s.

[@travispolson6156]

I remember when they claimed they found gravitional waves , one observation, and they alerted 📢 media . My main question was, if true and given the size of the universe, should we not be observing these waves constantly.

[@jwilliamcase]

We do. As of August 2024, the LIGO collaboration has detected more than 200 gravitational waves during its fourth observing run.

[@MatthewHolevinski]

@@jwilliamcase Have they been independently verified?

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@jwilliamcase Wrong! You have to learn to distinguish between observation and interpretation! By the way: more than 250,000 detectable phenomena of gw were calculated by computer, based on wrong theory, before LIGO was switched on;-) It is a single circular argument in which you are also moving;-) Learn science!

[@jwilliamcase]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee What you have is an assertion, not science. LIGO detections are correlated with optical observations not computation. What predictions does this 'electric cosmos' theory make? Here's one: items in a faraday cage should float free of gravitational effects! Learn science?

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@jwilliamcase If all other causes for these observations had been ruled out...) By the way: The grinding of the mirrors was much less accurate than the claimed deviations. And the mirror calibrations have not been published, which makes it impossible to verify the experiments and the claim. And so on. I think you should start at the beginning;-) Like Einstein. He already forgot one of the two necessary observers during relativity through motion at the beginning of the genesis of his SRT;-) Now even you will recognize the gr stupidity;-)

[@daviddrew7852]

It is time to wave goodbye to General Relativity.

[@RunsWithScissorsSenior]

Gravy wave goodbye.

[@j.pershing2197]

Bye, bye Einstonian Theoretics

[@ComedianDinger]

Yes

[@MyCatJeff]

A wave only exists as a noun until observed, then it becomes a verb.

[@senatorjosephmccarthy2720]

And the great dragon was cast out - that old serpent called the devil and Satan - which deceiveth the (hole) world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Revelation 12: 9.

[@klikklakis]

Did not a "scientist" of some long gone time ago not once say, in effect that "If we knew the structure of the electron, we would know the workings of the universe", or something to that akin to that. The current crop of "settled scientist" have move along the line of scientific knowledge as far from Newton, as Newton moved from from the theologians of his time. That gives us a lot of room to work with in the direction understanding the universal laws of physics and the structure of the universe.

[@B.Cote39]

Brilliant!! Thank you guys for all your work and devotion. 🙏truly appreciate

[@beowulfshaeffer8444]

Even assuming they could detect gravitational waves, the researchers themselves have pointed out how difficult it's been for them to separate the seismic data from any vibrations they'd be interested in. They engage in ridiculous amounts of post-processing and consequently have lots of room for error (again, assuming their theoretical basis were even sound).

[@davejones7632]

And detecting a gravitational wave at three widely separated locations, along with the EM signature expected for a binary neutron star merger, kind of puts your word salad to bed.

[@TiềnHứa-h7q]

@@davejones7632 stop barking dave puppy

[@timothy8426]

If it's a wave, it has to be physically amassing of mass of fibrous material. You can't wave space. It has to be energy outside of entanglement of mass as potential renewable heat energy waves.

[@NiallOBhillie]

Something cannot both be there and not there at the same time. It's there or it's not, and if there's nothing for it to carry on...then there's something. Where's the math?!?! 😂

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Electromagnetic waves also do without the support of fibrous material.

[@robneo888]

Keep up the excellent work

[@adrianamancuso4917]

Thank goodness for humility, whole-hearted, and whole-minded logic.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

none of which is found on this channel

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x 🙂 Aside: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense. Relativity - by motion - is mirrored. Even You don't recognize it)-;

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee No, he didn't.

[@TiềnHứa-h7q]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3xno you didn’t

[@rickrunner2219]

" you cannot wave nothing " only this phrase can collapse the entire standard model.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

spacetime isn't nothing, it is spacetime

[@daviddrew7852]

We need to get back to some form of aether model.

[@realbounty5221]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Tell me, smart guy, do you know the difference between concept and object? Don't you realize that abstract concepts such as “space” or “time” do not exist physically because they have neither a location nor a form? Irrational in physics means not taking the difference between object and concept into account.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@realbounty5221 Yes, thank you, I do know the difference. The observational results tell us that, contrary to what naive intuition might suggest, spacetime belongs to the category of physical objects. Of course, our analytical approach relies on concepts, but that is as true for a brick falling in your garden or an egg cooking in your kitchen.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@daviddrew7852 You are in luck then, because GR is, in effect, " some form of aether model".

[@philoso377]

Vacuum permittivity is require to take electric charge in space. So no permittivity in space no electric field takes place. In essence, vacuum permittivity and permeability are attributes of Aether, the light medium.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Einstein joked that he had abolished the aether (as classically imagined and still imagined by the folks here) and subsequently reintroduced it by reifying spacetime itself as the carrier of gravitation. His joke is often misquoted by cranks to make the spurious point that "Einstein repented."

[@philoso377]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x nothing that he offer make sense to me, includes his jokes. Those who couldn’t find flaws and are convinced in his theories are no more than disciples who can learn extremely well but think.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@philoso377 I think understanding SR does require more than a little thought.

[@davejones7632]

Total nonsense.

[@davejones7632]

@@philoso377 Care to deal with the observational and experimental evidence for relativity going back > 100 years? Thought not. Word salad is easy. Science is hard.

[@budgarner3522]

Nice work. Simplicity and humility lie at the base of most great discoveries and their applications. Perhaps there will soon be an electromagnetic and gravity conferences based upon observable vs mathematical evidence.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Simplicity and humility are enormous virtues which this channel lacks.

[@Herb.]

Fantastic mini documentary!

[@mcasteel2112]

Awesomeness. Merry 🎄🎁 Everyone. Hang in there, we're in for a wild ride in the next 5 years!

[@craigf2696]

Oh you Contheoryspirist ! 😂 Pay no mind to the sociopaths desperately trying to hide behind a falling and tattered curtain...

[@jamesweninger3679]

Einstein’s ideas are wrong. This video gets that right. Yet if gravity is a pressure from a medium, as Newton and others originally postulated, gravity waves ARE a real thing. Wal Thornhill at least took us back to the original problems with gravity theory.

[@davejones7632]

But you cannot show where Einstein was wrong. All talk, no science.

[@jamesweninger3679]

@ actually, Einstein’s model was wrong even on a fundamental level. Remember, the whole idea was to get away from the idea of faster than light speed propagation. If gravity was a force that propagated at the speed of light, there would be the orbital aberration problem. So, Einstein envisioned a curvature of space, which was instantaneous. So, no such thing as gravity waves then, because waves propagate. This is the problem. You can use Einstein’s model, and say space is just instantaneously curved around mass, getting away from the problem of orbital aberration, but then it means information on where an object exists is conveyed faster than light. Can’t pick both

[@davejones7632]

@@jamesweninger3679 Even by your standards, that is complete gibberish. No, Einstein said that gravity propagates at c. As was proven by the simultsaneous detection of gravitational waves and the EM signature from the binary neutron star merger in 2017. Not that most people were silly enough to think gravity acted instantaneously. A few versions of MOND did. They died that day. Unqualified crackpots like Thornhill did. However, who cares what unqualified crackpots think?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@davejones7632 answer: even more unqualified crackpots

[@Kaimelar8]

​@@davejones7632What have you shown here Dave? Belief in magical thermal effects, never proven "magnetic reconnection" 😂

[@johnchase2148]

Einsteins best theory is that imagination is more important than knowledge..

[@trygvenelson9740]

@@johnchase2148 sounds like you fundamentally don’t understand what a “theory” is.

[@weinerdog137]

What was the time delta?

[@fredzurcher7118]

Time and gravity are spiritual nature.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

If only...

[@YawnGod]

4:17 I still don't understand what item of vestiture he's saying.

[@4n2earth22]

..."wearing a mortarboard" aka an intellectual giant who just got educated to the point of stupidity.

[@raycar1165]

Mortarboard The square cap worn during a graduation ceremony. Has a resemblance a mortar board that masons would use.

[@YawnGod]

@@raycar1165 Thanks, bro.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@4n2earth22 bit of aggrieved jealousy there?

[@robertsteele474]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Struck a nerve there, did he?

[@Dubsizzla]

Wal passed away?? I had no idea. That saddens me.

[@Flame-Bright-Cheer]

I feel so incredibly fortunate to be able to understand and to open my mind to the obvious truth that is the electric Universe. ..... thank you Einstein you got us this far, but looks like we can take it from here. ⚡☀️⚡

[@davejones7632]

How are you going to take it anywhere? You have no science and you have no scientists.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@davejones7632 What they have is resentful moaning about things they don't understand.

[@OhhhhhhhBugger]

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

[@rogerscottcathey]

In other words, the refraction of the image of the sun viewed from the surface isn't what Thornhill is talking about, but the 8 minute old image is true even seen from the moon's surface. Was Earth to be arcing around the apparent rather than the actual physical position, Earth would be arcing inward towards the sun. Not sure what he meant by slingshot effect. There might be a braking effect . . .

[@markschweitzer]

we are being drug through the galaxy by our star. we do not go around the sun. our circle is an endless elispe

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@markschweitzer actually, no we have some momentum of our own going in the same direction as our star

[@davejones7632]

Thornhill really didn't have a clue what he was talking about. He and physics were strangers to each other.. He thought gravity acted instantaneously! Lol. The binary neutron star merger, and associated EM signature in 2017 finally put paid to that silly idea. Strangely, Thornhill never commented on that.

[@brendanwood1540]

Much like two balls in a ball pit are not entangled directly, two atomic particles are not entangled directly. Although, the position of one ball will translate through the entire ball pit and influence all the other balls including the balls on the furthest extremities of the pit. To expand the idea, the position of every ball in the pit will actually change the dynamics of the entire atmosphere in the room and that will be reflected around the room because the energy is mostly contained in that room. Some small vibrations will translate through the structure and out into the world. So however tiny the influence, every movement of a ball in that pit will influence everything. The signal is an energy displacement and oscillation that travels through mediums. The signal frequency is exactly determined by the physical dimensions of matter and what frequency will scale to fit those dimensions with smooth continuous wave forms. There are specific intervals that resonate and those frequencies will propagate. As mass increases the frequency is lower and the amplitude larger. Entanglement is a messy term for the harmonics and resonance of actual matter. Which is actually full of cymatic patterns and order. Transverse waves an over simplification of three dimensional vortex oscillations. Wave superposition is the so called third state of bits being both on and off at the same time. It is not possible to isolate these bits from external fields. Because all matter is intrinsically bound by and itself a source of fields. All matter can be reduced to hydrogen and the sub-components of hydrogen which are positive and negatively charged particles. Those particles generate fields and those fields are everything in physics.

[@philharmer198]

Great stuff . Not into the bits , computer part . The space and the physical is my thinking . For without which neither bits or a computer could exist .

[@kevinbyrne5037]

Any Observations here?

[@paulveenings6861]

That’s a bit suspicious 🤔

[@NitinGupta-ge8dc]

Keep up the good work 👍

[@carolinahammer9480]

👍, subscribe, share and comment

[@rwarts5150]

What really bothers me is the way science and so-teachers professors act as if there theories are scientific fact with not ever seeing it with their own eyes or taking actual measurements and repeating it

[@dextermorgan1]

It infuriates me. They are just as bad as flat earthers when it comes to not admitting they could be wrong. I don't know the subject well enough to argue it but I know the electric Universe model is very likely correct. I know that by using common sense, and listening to people smarter than I am.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@dextermorgan1 scientists talk about how they could be wrong all the time - have you ever spoken at length with a real scientist?

[@daviddrew7852]

Yes, very few are honest. "There is no model for gravity other than the mathematical model." R Feynman

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@daviddrew7852 Sure, but that is true for just about everything in physics.

[@davejones7632]

@@daviddrew7852 And the maths describes it with exquisite precision. Electric woo explains nothing.

[@talonthorn]

I've speculated that as an alternative to gravity being a force that acts on planets at extreme speeds, the planets/moons could simply be following a passageway around another body through the plasma. The plasma field, planets, and moons move with the sun, and "roll" along these "groves" or tunnels in the plasma. If by chance, one planet were to become disturbed by another large object, that could dislodge it from its "grove." However, it would seem that the electricity flow through a planet is also part of this system, and thus could be part of a yet to be identified mechanism that helps keep the planet within its"grove."

[@markschweitzer]

@@talonthorn safire proved that and they called it double layers. all bodies have this asin....the electric fields surrounding our planet. thus is how the tornados created by generating apprasists, ie alt. and Gen. and the like. allow us to ground through and have electricity. we take it from the air and use it. electric current is in double layers every so many feet up through the atmosphere.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

there is no evidence for such grooves

[@talonthorn]

@ so, what you're saying is it is possible, and it also may exist in a form we have not considered. The simpler explanation points toward looking for an answer where the forces are local rather than having to act over long distances at extreme speeds.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@talonthorn whichever way you turn it, even "local" forces still correlate with the presence of energy/mass at prodigious distances

[@talonthorn]

@ Certainly, but the hidden assumption with that viewpoint is that "local forces" do not exist. The viewpoint I am expressing is not compatible with that viewpoint. As with any paradigm shift, it is not possible to contemplate unless you can first find your way outside of your current box.

[@EliteRock]

Our "misunderstanding" is nothing of the sort, we've been lied to, truth deliberately hidden.

[@dcorgard]

Bravo!

[@MacLuckyPTP]

When will there be a review of the Malcolm Thunderstorm Generator ?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

you can build one yourself and enjoy all its advantages

[@dougmills3380]

AND I SAY THAT LIKE HE'S STILL ALIVE BECAUSE I KNOW HIS SPIRIT IS WITH US

[@senatorjosephmccarthy2720]

No need to yell.

[@philoso377]

Light wave is transverse displacement . Gravity is longitudinal displacement. Not all transverse and longitudinal propagation speed are equal. Yes it is easily said than done by Einstein.

[@DEVICELINK-w1z]

Those intelligentsia currently arriving/awakening in their ships have a lot of constructive information to move us from our darkness.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

ships???

[@FrankPatterson-v5n]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x This world wide disclosure of the aerial ships will ramp up as they become more visually differentiated from the "drone" distractions and bogus explanations.. The cabal know exactly what these ET's are and to admit they are here to elevate us would admit defeat.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@FrankPatterson-v5n are you saying it's aliens, then? genuine question.

[@corkygoss7403]

Have a look at Bob Greenyer's work as well. A New Kosmology is developing quite rapidly. Peace Cheers Onward. PS Thanks Mr. Thornhill, et al.

[@davejones7632]

Greenyer is a two-bit engineer with zero clue about physics. That is why his nonsense doesn't exist in the scientific literature.

[@GiraelCS]

@ThunderboltsProject Could you cover Norbert Feist's acoustic Michelson-Morley experiment (originally published in 2001 in german and later in 2010 translated to english). I believe Mr. Feist has stumbled upon the fundamental problem at the heart of this entire issue. It is baffling that his potentially revolutionary work hasn't been cited or mentioned anywhere, since it has the potential to literally resolve the entire issue concerning Relativity and the Aether. Putting Aether back on the menu, so to speak, and rendering Relativity obsolete.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

Relativistic Doppler and acoustic Doppler are distinct effects.

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

The MME is a false experiment. It cannot prove what it claims to prove. And: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee he did not - read the paper more carefully

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x He did;-) Relativity is a mirrored phenomenon! And now start using your head for more than just scratching;-))

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee okay, deranged invective

[@parodyrecord]

See the Pattern has a great critique of all gravitation theories

[@davejones7632]

Another windbag who should stick to engineering.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@davejones7632 how come so many crackpots turn out to have engineering degrees? (Note how I am not claiming that most engineers are crackpots - in fact the engineers I know personally are pretty smart folks.)

[@jasonmiller7794]

Well done.

[@johnbreen5668]

Just beginning to solve... we have hardly begun to ask the questions to solve. They are to busy 'proving they are smarter then everyone else

[@Xocarek]

If it wasn't a gravity wave, then what was it?

[@markschweitzer]

earthquake low radio signals somewhere

[@ronaldkemp3952]

@4:55 Indeed, Einstein didn't understand gravity. That's why he proposed 2 different scenarios after astronomers discovered galaxies were moving away from us in every direction. He proposed that if the effects of gravity were not infinite, then after a big bang the universe would expand at a cosmological constant. The furthest galaxies would not be affected by gravity and continue moving away from us at a constant velocity. He said if the effects of gravity were infinite, then he proposed the furthest galaxies would be slowing down, come to a halt then reverse directions and eventually the universe would end in what he called the big crunch. Edwin Hubble studying the motion of galaxies discovered galaxies were not only moving away from us in every direction, but the further the galaxy, the faster it was moving away. Proving both of Einstein's ideas about gravity to be wrong, his cosmological constant and his big crunch. Einstein also predicted what's known as look back time where because of the speed of light, big bang and the age of the universe that telescopes would be able to see back into the universe's past the further and more sensitive the telescope. Recently the JWST proved that idea wrong too when it measured old, not young but old, fully mature galaxies further than a light distance of 14 billion light years away. Einstein's equations also predicted that nothing, not even light is able to escape the gravity of a black hole, and gravitational lensing of light. In 1919 Arthur Eddington claims he measured the light of a distant star to be located in a different spot during a total solar eclipse and said it was evidence of Einstein's gravitational lensing of light. Yet no other scientist confirmed his claim. I've tried to repeat his experiment during the 2022 total solar eclipse and was unable to see any stars beyond the sun and moon conjunction because the sun's corona ring around the moon was way too bright to see distant dim stars. Which made me believe Eddington lied to get recognition. Search the internet for images of total solar eclipses and you won't find a single image showing stars behind the diamond ring effect or umbra where the sun's corona shines brightly around the moon. Eddington basically lied. Stars cannot be measured during a total solar eclipse. Einstein didn't even know what was causing gravity. sure his and Newton's equations perfectly describe the orbits, trajectories and motion of planets and other small bodies orbiting the sun, but they never addressed the action causing gravity because they didn't know. There is a simple experiment that can be done to determine if gravitational waves are the result of black holes colliding. Simply go through the radio telescope data and look for an electromagnetic event that occurred at the same moment and location of the gravitational wave detected by LIGO. If the gravitational waves were produced by a pair of black holes colliding, because nothing can escape them then they would not produce an electromagnetic signature. EM waves are light. Light is not supposed to be able to escape one black hole, let along the mass of two colliding. I wrote to NASA astronomers in 2015 after LIGO measured the first GW. I suggested they go over the radio telescope and look for an EM signature at the same time and location of the GW. I told them if it was a pair of black hole colliding it would not produce the EM signature. If it wasn't a pair of black holes colliding it would produce the EM signature. A week or so went by and they confirmed, at the same moment and location where the GW occurred they discovered an EM signature and then was required to downplay the event as a pair of neutron stars colliding, not black holes. I'm willing to bet, every time a GW is measured, an EM signature accompanies it, indicating black holes colliding are not causing the GWs they're measuring. Some other electromagnetic event is causing the so called GWs. Even today, scientists and new articles continue to claim the first GW discovered in 2015 was from a pair of black holes colliding. They refuse to accept the data from radio telescopes proving otherwise.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

I tend to think he did alright, though.

[@ThienLuu-n3i]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x i think you get out and stop comment stupid 👌

[@robhannum]

Great stuff. Thanks for posting.. any idea on the next conference? I would love to go to one.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

love to hand over your money to grifters?

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x LIKE TROLL

[@NiallOBhillie]

Science, I realized, is lacking the old energy the Greeks had. If we gave all this to Pythagoras, which do we think he would conclude is correct? One assumes he would be lost, but if we break it down we say to him... "We measured waves in space" or we say, "All things are, in essence, in flux as energy" Show him pictures and math or show him an experiment. A philosopher of old could even tell us fools lead our inquiries.

[@pentagrammaton6793]

Yes, philosophical enquiry is sadly lacking in modern science, and you can see it writ large by one or two relativists in this comments section.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@pentagrammaton6793 bless

[@davejones7632]

@@pentagrammaton6793 Care to show where relativity has ever been shown to be wrong from experiment and observation? Course not. All you have is word salad. And word salad is easy. Science is hard. Which is why you only have the former.

[@dcorgard]

Having done enough data crunching myself, I can't see how they justify pulling a supposed "signal" out of an extremely low Signal-to-Noise ratio on the same order of magnitude as the noise itself..? Let's say it's 1:1 - you can't tell if it is signal or noise, and their data looks to have a ratio less than 1:1. It appears they took random noise as a positive signal and declared victory because they were being pressed for results or their future funding would be at stake.

[@davejones7632]

The usual crackpot word salad.

[@4n2earth22]

Everything is absolutely relative and nothing is nonexistent.

[@philharmer198]

To your first statement . How so ? To your second statement . Absolutely True .

[@senatorjosephmccarthy2720]

Peace on earth is non-existent.

[@philharmer198]

@@senatorjosephmccarthy2720 one day , when we mature enough , there will be peace . When we mingle with other peoples , cultures of our world . From Different Countries , And think nothing of it . Because we respect life and its differences . If i was capable I would want to be fluent in every language of our peoples , of our planet . I think that's 197 different languages . Some are close to being the same but there are differences obviously . 197 languages , that's a lot . But we would understand each other much better . Therefore resolve our differences . Most people just want to live a good life .

[@realbounty5221]

To exist in the physical sense, it needs two properties: location and form. Without one of these properties, there is no existence!

[@4n2earth22]

@@realbounty5221 Any perceivable reality requires (at minimum) three points of reference. Thus, the 'exist' you reference requires space, time, and energy; the various states they each possess fills out most tangible (to our available senses) states of 'exist'.

[@evawilldrive]

I just remembered in slovenian children's story, fairytale (Little Sleepy Star = Zvezdica Zaspanka. Written by Slovenian Author Fran Milčinski Ježek. Shortest synopsys: she comes to Earth to encounter a bandit, who has to remember to listen to his heart again.

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

who are you mocking ?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@trungtamienmayquocquang7233 it is pretty obvious, trung

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x IT'S OBVIOUS THAT THE THEORY OF RELATIVITY IS DYING AND THE INCOMPETENT ARE AFRAID OF BEING CUT OFF OF AID

[@jamesbarber5410]

Knowing that a “black hole” isn’t exactly what they think it is, but that something does exist, what are we actually dealing with? What kind of a galactic ground fault would it take to make something 100billion times the mass of the sun?

[@philharmer198]

A great deal of energy . Making a great deal of mass . And enormus Rotational movement , magnetic fields , vibration . Heat energy , light energy , particle energy . Galaxies do it all . So does the Sun . Just on a smaller scale . But the same idea .

[@markschweitzer]

a hundred billion times the charge of the sun minus the charge of the sun. ie it's mass

[@nadahere]

It has been said on this channel many times that the electric force is 39 orders of magnitude [that's 10^39, or 10 to the 39th power, or 1 followed by 39 zeros] more powerful than gravitational force. There is no huge mass involved. Stop thinking along the old faulty paradigms MSS perpetuates. The figures and ideas/conclusions lamestream science puts out regarding BHs and most other cosmological phenomena are based of flawed physics and math and they have to be taken with a grain of salt bc they are fake/fiction. === The following touches on many past topics on Anton Petrov's vids. I write some version of this on his channel every day. === 👽👽👽 In concert w my previous comments on Anton Petrov's channel, don't say 'we don't know blah, blah...' because this is on par with Plasma Cosmology. These radio burst and 'clouds' are simply part of the Birkeland currents/plasma filaments that make up the Cosmic Web. This, along w the Fermi bubbles, will be observed everywhere. 'Black Hole'[sic] observations also support the EU hypothesis. There is so much wrong w the BigBung hypothesis that even MSS is backing off. The 'bizarre' strand corona and jets [they are Birkeland currents/filaments] of the BHs and the super hot corona of the Sun are natural features of the EU model and so are NOT unexplained [we know what these are! ]. Mapping the magnetic fields [whose source is actually electric ;-)p ] in the Uni has begun and so far it has baffled MSS but only confirms the EU model. Thanks!!! MSS just fails to learn proper physics. So the blind are leading the blind. Hey, don't sh00t the messenger. Here are a few samples of this failure: Black holes DO NOT exist and are but plasmoids which then reinforces the Electric Universe hypothesis. Birkeland currents/plasma-strands/jets in EU, on the other hand, explain the associated phenomena easily. Existence of BH's is falsified [proven false] by video: Wal Thornhill: On the Black Hole's Non-existence | Space News - Clearly Black Holes can't exist even by the principles put forth by lamestream science. They contradict themselves. See video: Stephen Crothers: The Parallax Effect on Short Hair | EU2014 Video: Exposing the Myth of Gravitational Lensing | Space News Can Stars BEND LIGHT? Hell NO! Not even it's powerful magnetic field can bend light...as some ppl erroneously believe. See video Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye! Video regarding general relativity put in question by Dr. Ed Dowdye: Solar Gravitation and Solar Plasma Wave Propagation Interaction, Einstein rings and gravitational effect on atomic clocks Edward Dowdye Jr - The Failed Attempts to Detect Macro Lensing E U Conference 2012' --- [ atoms modeled as electric charges] Eddington's light deflection observation was only due to diffraction through the solar limb outside of which no bending occurred but should have, according to Onerock! See Dr. Robitaille's latest Sun model [Video: Solid Bodies and Mercury: The Perihelion Precession Explained! ] which now posits a solid core/surface of planar metallic hydrogen. This may then account for the precession of Mercury, nullifying Onerock's theories. My derivative corollary is that the upwelling of the intercalate layers can cause mass ejecta which then form planets and other objects. == Claims of a Black Hole Image: the Day Astrophysics Died - Sky Scholar, Pierre-Marie Robitaille, Ph.D., Material That You Can Make at Home That Actually Bends Light! uses gradient indexed material - sugar water = mirages . How well does it correlate with Prof. Dowdey's critique of Arthur Eddington's gravity-light bending experiment? Video: Crazy Material That You Can Make at Home That Actually Bends Light! Video: New Images Unlock the Secrets of the Cosmic Web, It's Magnetic! 🧲⚡The filamentary structures that pervade the Uni on all scales contradict the grabbitational model which only allows spherical or discoid geometries. Blah, blah... == Einstein/Onerock has been disproved many other ways which then destroys the underlying claims of the BigBong theory, among other things. == I offer up these resources to ppl: Plasma Cosmology [Electric Universe theory] predicts and describes the Uni more completely and eloquently. See the Thunderbolts Project channel. Also 'See The Pattern', 'Unzicker's Real Physics', Ray Flemming's channel and Prof. Pierre-Marie Robitaille's 'Sky Scholar' channels... to start. As a consequence you too will find the current sciences distasteful. Naturally I don't recommend the 'conventional' physics sources as they are on the wrong path. Sciences have come to be about preserving the status quo because of $, jobs, egos, and now reputations. A great number of professionals left their fields disillusioned and now talk about the failure of the science and the system. At the top, the elite don't want their minions running around the universe...free. They want to play god. Check out these vids: ==> The censorship of cosmology | Eric Lerner [Eric disproves the BigBangGang hypothesis*!!!* Eric Lerner is saying that for a non-expanding universe, galaxy size is linearly proportional to distance, *as the evidence shows*. In the expanding universe theory, the galaxies should be much smaller in size (to the fourth power) and less bright than we actually observe. He’s correct BUT his papers have not been accepted because there are too many reputations and too much funding for the Big Bang research Gang on the line.] ==> Challenging the Big Bang: The Struggle with Inferred Reality ==> History of the Gaseous Sun with Dr. Robitaille === Me, I'm only a triple engineer rewriting the electromagnetic theory which, as you know, touches everything else. I call it the Parallax Electric Theory [PET] which dispenses with the anachronistic notion of magnetism. Everything is but charges [electric fields]. ~~~ Know plasma, know 99.999% of the Universe (No plasma, no Universe) ~~~ === PS. From where I stand, the Uni is flat[i.e. infinite], static[i.e. not expanding], eternal[albeit finite lifespan at present] and 'c' is just a number [do you know what that means?][hint, add it all up]. [It means that 'c' is not the maximal speed in the Uni... because Onerock is dead )) ]

[@daviddrew7852]

A plasmoid.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@daviddrew7852 oh, come now

[@bobann3566]

10:30 "stretching spacetime?" Did the EU return to turning an absence and a measure into a fabric?

[@markschweitzer]

was Einsteins use not eu

[@AArata63]

I remember when LIGO was in a precarious situation with money drying up and so many years without ANY results and suddenly: EUREKA, Gravitational waves were discovered left and right :)

[@gamebent]

Thank you.

[@reneestanger6923]

I think by 2026 all science will know the ether, welcome to the age of aquarius

[@cango5679]

been hoping "all science" to get there...and they will... but won't dare to predict when...

[@Entity8473]

Relativity and special relativity are both observer bias theories based on things that, at the time, were mostly untestable. The problem is that you are taught to maintain the bias in science.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

quite testable, in fact

[@pentagrammaton6793]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x models do not necessarily reflect reality, no matter how the mathematics can be made to blindside. Description is not explanation.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@pentagrammaton6793 science does not aim to explain, that's for the metaphysicists

[@kerie8614]

I never could swallow the whole notion on it.

[@davejones7632]

You mean it is beyond your ability to comprehend. That doesn't hold for everyone.

[@weinerdog137]

Isn't there also a ligo in Italy? Or am I experiencing a Mandeville moment?

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

you mean Mandela?

[@weinerdog137]

@physicswithpark3r-x3x yes, auto correct. But, it kinda works too!

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@weinerdog137 Located outside of Pisa, Italy, Virgo is a gravitational wave interferometer with arms 3km long (LIGO's are 4km long). Virgo is hosted by the European Gravitational Observatory (EGO), a collaboration of the Italian and French governments. In 2017, after completing a significant upgrade to improve its sensitivity, Virgo joined LIGO near the tail end of LIGO's second observing run, marking the first time that three comparable gravitational wave detectors were operating in unison. Within three weeks of Virgo joining the search, not only did they make their own first detection, but they were instrumental in helping to localize the source of the first gravitational waves detected from merging neutron stars, an event that also emitted electromagnetic radiation, i.e., light. That historic first "multimessenger" detection was subsequently observed by at least one-third of the world's professional astronomers. Virgo continues to observe alongside LIGO in current observing runs.

[@marcin4xm]

Ligi are like super microphones .When we put detected graw wave sygnał thru spiker the sound is similar to click in iPhone.its possibe that 2 iphines was screen clicked same time in two ligo sites that created this false signal

[@jimbones155]

The real question is; how do we know our reality is correct.

[@paulveenings6861]

It might not be correct but it is our reality.

[@efdangotu]

I know reality is real, but I don't know if you are.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

We don't but Wittgenstein postulated it

[@Bobcat-1967]

We are not "In it" we are it.

[@craigf2696]

Right freakin on!! We see the grand creator through the eyes of the creator.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@craigf2696 some hubris there

[@craigf2696]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x Stop running the program and think for yourself. It's what you're DESIGNED to do. The creator IS creation. You are part of creation and cannot be separated but by an illusion planted in your mind.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@craigf2696 Thinking for myself, it does not occur to me that I am seeing through the eyes of God. It seems to me blasphemous and arrogant to entertain such notions.

[@craigf2696]

@physicswithpark3r-x3x "Those who WILL not see".

[@dextermorgan1]

14:22 Einstein was obviously a humble man. He would probably be sickened at what "Science" has turned into due to using his theories. It sounds like he just wanted to find out the truth. Regardless if he was correct or not.

[@daviddrew7852]

Yes, others ran with his ideas, and ran, and ran....

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@daviddrew7852 well, one runs with a good idea. Some people even run with terrible ideas, eh?

[@DrOtto-sx7cp]

... he was 'controlled'.

[@maximvsdread1610]

@DrOtto-sx7cp By (((whom)))?

[@elfeiin]

He was probably a jew.

[@daemonnice]

Einstein didn't det rid of Maxwell's ether. What he did was to take the ether based on Lorentz Transformation Equations, removed the part about motion to describe what he called back in the 1920s, the static ether of general relativity or space time.this did not catch on. He also said that GR was not a mechanism for gravity, but abstract field equations. If Einstein knew back in 1905 what we have discovered during the space age with satellite technology; the plethora of electromagnetic phenomena, he, as an etherian, would not have written GR based on a hypothetical spacetime matrix.

[@ArchonOne]

Great presentation David. This was one of my favorite Wal presentations.

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

HI MATT YOU FINE ?

[@ArchonOne]

@ not bad! How about you?

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@ArchonOne DAVE COMES IN HERE TROLLS CONTINUOUSLY MAKING ME ANNOYED

[@JJ33438]

I was 9 years old when I realized that Einstein's search for a "unified field" in the complexes of gravity, was wrong. As a child I instinctively knew the "unified field" was one thing....E/M. Don't know how I knew that but since then I listen to cosmologists and physicists and I realize that most have "group think" syndrome. they work at government paid facilities and are paid for an outcomes- not true research. Same way with Tessla if we had listened to that man....and gone with his research - .we today would have free electrical power across the globe .....eliminating poverty and starvation but........we went with the "group think" money maker, the "politically pandering thinker" and still paying a fortune for what should be free. No utopia thinking allowed here folks. THANK YOU FOR THESE STIMULATING AND EDUCATIONAL VIDEOS.

[@summerbrooks9922]

You reminded me of a study of mice. Scientists built a paradise for mice. A small population of mice were given all the best food, water and shelter plus exercise wheels. Well, you can guess the outcome. Population explosion came first. Then due to food shortages, violence. I mean violence like killing their newly born. Then extinction wiped them out totally. Think about it. Sound familiar?

[@summerbrooks9922]

Guys, if you want a better world, eliminate poverty, completely. Existence is not fun. Living is. We cannot continue with this mouse paradise thing.

[@Dracula-sn3so]

He was nothing more than a math magician¥

[@davejones7632]

Want to deal with all the observational and experimental evidence that shows that Einstein was right?

[@jwilliamcase]

why am i listening to a guy who cannot pronounce 'interferometer' tell me why they don't work as expected?

[@robertsteele474]

Why should I believe a guy who does not know how to use the Shift key to capitalize on a keyboard?😱

[@jwilliamcase]

@@robertsteele474 i made a choice. it's called style, you should check it out.

[@FloydD.Barber]

Am I invisible.

[@shawns0762]

Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. Einstein wrote in 1939 - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (he was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star); whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to dilation. It's the phenomenon our high school teachers were talking about when they said "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". This does not mean mass increases, it means mass becomes spread throughout spacetime relative to an outside observer. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. It occurs wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass, this includes the centers of high mass stars and the majority of galaxy centers. Dilation is occurring in our own galactic center. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. In other words that mass is all around us. It's the "missing mass" needed to explain galaxy rotation curves. It doesn't occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 6 ultra diffuse galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 to have normal rotation rates, in other words they have no dark matter/dilated mass.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

actually, Penrose proved an interesting theorem on these matters

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

There is neither time dilation nor length contraction in motion ("relativity"). Moreover, both would correspond to deceleration at constant speed: they contradict each other. So this is also mathematical nonsense.

[@shawns0762]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x The laws of physics didn't change when Einstein died. Relativity does not predict singularities when dilation is factored in. There is no Schwarzchild radius according to Schwarzchild. He was publicly corrected multiple times and knew he was wrong. Penrose made the same mistake. The recent discovery that very low mass galaxies have predictable star rotation rates is confirmation Einstein was correct. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is not occurring in these galaxies.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@shawns0762 well, yes, strictly speaking, these singularities are in the infinite future from an outsider's point of view, which raises an interesting question when the BH finally pops out of existence. Dilation is already a part of SR, best not confuse SR and GR.

[@shawns0762]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee I have been studying physics since before you were born most likely. Everything I said is correct. Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Hence the term "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Yes, there is no length contraction. Einstein didn't agree with that. That wasn't his math, he hired someone for that. Relativity does not predict singularities/astronomical concentrations of mass when dilation is factored in. Einstein repeatedly spoke about this. Nobody believed in singularities when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrodinger, Dirac, Pauli, Feynman etc. because that would violate the known laws of physics.

[@Nobe_Oddy]

Wal's death was one of the GREATEST LOSSES to SCIENCE and MANDKIND as a whole 😢 May he rest in peace

[@davejones7632]

He had no involvement in science, so his loss was of no import to science.

[@TiềnHứa-h7q]

@@davejones7632 stop barking out meaningless comments kid who cares about your comments go suck your mother's milk and go back to elementary school kid you only come here to troll then stop barking like a puppy kid

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@davejones7632 🙂 Aside: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense. Relativity - by motion - is mirrored. Even You don't recognize it)-;

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee you seem to be posting this very same comment a lot, so perhaps it is time you proofread it once or twice?

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x so you just troll nonsense barking nonsense words like dave the dog then

[@petrosros]

Actually, the word Space means the absence of things.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

nope

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

... ergo: no-thing. A concept only;-)

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee we only really grasp things through concepts, so you are not actually saying much

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@physicswithpark3r-x3x You claim to be able to bend centimeters;-)

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee Not by much, I only weigh about 90 kilograms.

[@paul1887]

I don't know what a mornibard is, how do you spell that?

[@dextermorgan1]

You just did...

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@dextermorgan1 but he suspects he has misspelled it (or he makes fun of the way the speaker said it)

[@philoso377]

Einstein is half right in saying gravity is not an attribute of matter but space. He is full wrong in saying gravity don’t exist, following a trend that made him famous recently in asserting that Aether the light medium don’t exist. In my opinion gravity is an attribute of space and not originate from matter. It pulls but attract. The effect support all Newton’s laws.

[@philharmer198]

Of course gravity exists in space . Where else would gravity exist ? Gravity is about spinning and directional rotation of our Earth . Centrifugal combined with rotational inward direction from above our heads . The net is that the rotation of Earth is the cause of things falling .

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@philharmer198 nope

[@bobann3566]

Gravity accelerates centripetally which is curved and so it cannot wave.

[@markschweitzer]

a big displacement of electric charge could create a wave of instability. like reversing a dual positive magnetic torus which is how field bubbles are formed

[@paulveenings6861]

👋

[@bobann3566]

@@markschweitzer That would be Magnetism waving, not gravity. Have you read Charles Proteus Steinmetz explanation of the Electric Field, which is made up of a Dielectric Field and a Magnetic Field. The Dielectric Field is centripetal, inward acceleration just like Gravity, and Electrostatics and the so called Magnetic Attraction part of magnetism which is really Dielectricity because Magnetism is like Ice to Dielectricities water, the same thing in a different pressure modality.

[@concettaworkman5895]

Gravy Waves, LOL!

[@crucifixgym]

9:03 David Shoemaker neither plays bass guitar nor knows what 20 or 30Hz sounds like.

[@dantheman9135]

Crush on Electric Universe

[@rodkeh]

Gravity is a pulling force Not a pushing force, so waves are an absolutely impossible phenomena!

[@dantheman9135]

Suppose it wouldn't hurt to let people know Einstein also was into his cousin and ger daughter...ouch

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

did you write ouch because you could not even spell the word _her_ ?

[@raycar1165]

Much ❤ Love 🌏🌎🌍☯️⚡️ Terra 🌞 Pax

[@jaykent1836]

Black Holes, Dark Matter....Absurdities of Infinitudes

[@TheIndigoKnight]

It is like a cult. I enjoy watching people react when I question these theories, it isn't far off from any other zealots of a dogma they have faith in.

[@donvincentwalters2705]

Check out Kenneth Wheeler, Tattooed Monkey. Theoria Apophisis. A bit eccentric but some great perspectives.

[@ronp5615]

"Simplicity is the key to the electric universe"

[@davejones7632]

Nope. The word you are looking for is 'impossibility'.

[@TiềnHứa-h7q]

@@davejones7632 stop barking out meaningless comments kid who cares about your comments go suck your mother's milk and go back to elementary school kid you only come here to troll then stop barking like a puppy kid

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@davejones7632 🙂 Aside: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense. Relativity - by motion - is symmetric. Even You don't recognize it)-;

[@davejones7632]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee _"Einstein disregarded one of the two observers"_ Gibberish. Just because you don't understand relativity does not mean that smarter people don't. If he got it wrong, why does all the evidence support SR? Got any science? Word salad born of ignorance doesn't cut it.

[@trungtamienmayquocquang7233]

@@davejones7632 it's funny when a theologian is saying stupid things kid should go back to elementary school

[@AshleyGraetz]

Newton and his apple would be proud.

[@davidrandell2224]

SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math. GR follows as incorrect. Gravity is simple relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything.

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

reference frame mixing?

[@Archer-NatureWorn]

How you know you're on the right track, I started thinking about neutrinos before you said it.

[@judgementhallcollections8168]

When you jump the band gap of light you begin to find a path to explain dark energy, dark matter

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

Dark energy and matter are the adaption of the observation to inadequate theories and equations only: unscientific, morons act.

[@tomladdus9264]

Einstein set science back 200 years (into the future too) I will give him credit for being somewhat humble about his ideas. The same can not be said for main stream science.

[@davejones7632]

Word salad. Care to show where Einstein was wrong? Thought not.

[@tomladdus9264]

@@davejones7632 Everything in a thing called Relativity.

[@davejones7632]

@@tomladdus9264 Is that supposed to mean something? I said show where Einstein has been shown to be wrong. Simple. It does not require more science-free word salad. Just an experiment or observation.

[@TiềnHứa-h7q]

@@davejones7632 stop barking dave puppy

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

@@davejones7632 🙂 Aside: Einstein disregarded one of the two observers (two systems through motion). At the very beginning of his SRT genesis. Everything from here on is unscientific nonsense. Relativity - by motion - is mirrored. Even You don't recognize it)-;

[@torussaga3428]

We are it for the universe is expanding into consciousness.

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

Gravitational Waves = Light Waves

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

nope

[@hollaadieewaldfeee]

Gravitational waves = nonsens;-)

[@physicswithpark3r-x3x]

@@hollaadieewaldfeee why is your spelling so odd? are you Dutch or German by any chance?

[@revcrussell]

There are no such things as neutrinos either.