Gravitational Wave Background Discovered?

[@jimmyjoe1488]

Love how you articulate things so intuitively, so that someone can understand the framework of quantum mechanics, rather than depending on confusing terms to build their internal model.

[@4kevbot3]

This is one of the best channels on space science on KZbin. Many thanks for all the great work.

[@thetobi583]

There's still something i don't understand... If we are supposed to be using simulations to explain the universe, why is it we only use gravity? Why don't we put electromagnetism in the supercomputers as well?

[@StrattCaster]

Because our primitive prequantum computers are garbage and couldn't handle it

[@NicholsonNeisler-fz3gi]

Gravity is dominate on large scales

[@Jupiterloobncj]

To exactly understand what? At the end of it, mathematical models are for you to be able to confirm what you can calculate with hand (in a super long time). But it doesnt mean that you throw everything in and the computer will find you the missing links in between different subjects. Finite element models are just complex calculators, not omniscient awareness machines.

[@No0dl_e-g2i]

because we need an equation that unifies them.

[@gcoffey223]

​@No0dl_e-g2i As long as the mass at the pointbof singularity has mass but zero volune, we won't unify anything

[@oldschoolman1444]

The more we learn the more questions we have. 😊

[@deinemutter758]

I know that i know nothing opens the door to can be know everything ❤

[@tonyjohnson8929]

Are you declaring and submitting this as a postulate for peer review? With the equations and theory to follow post haste, yes? 🤔

[@Lit_Hot_takes]

Space matters your videos constantly very impress me.🌠

[@Noobinski]

Although it's just AI?

[@AWKuhns]

The simple answer is gravity is related to mass. It is a byproduct of the positive force that holds atoms together. The question should be what holds atoms together?

[@magma90]

The positive force that holds atoms together is the strong nuclear force (not to be confused with the strong force carried by gluons). This force holds protons and neutrons together by transferring mesons which are spin 0 or 1 particles that are made of a quark and anti-quark (of different varieties so that they don’t annihilate). These mesons have been experimentally measured via particle decays that would only make sense if they exist. Because protons and neutrons are made of quarks, they can interact with the mesons via the strong force which then creates the strong nuclear force as a byproduct of quantum fluctuations and colour confinement (which is the property of the strong force that causes quarks to have to be bound to other quarks). The way that the strength of the strong force (and by extension the strong nuclear force) scales over distance does not match that of gravity (due to colour confinement), and therefore gravity is unlikely to be the byproduct of the force that holds atoms together.

[@Birkelandaurora]

Electromagnetic universe

[@DerekBarton-gl8kf]

Absolutely eye opening my friend Thank you so much for your help and hard work ❤

[@charlesemond7916]

Mass under compression is the development of gravitational pull. The greater the collective mass the greater the gravitational force.

[@zhavlan1258]

New technologies, new research tools Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)

[@keep_walking_on_grass]

Thx for the outstanding content.

[@khalid6050ify]

Great description of thoughts & wonderful movie I have seen uptill now.

[@Sebastianmaz615]

WHAT!! Holy ----! 10:45 (concerning graviton detectors) 😬

[@bobjackson6669]

Great video. I shared it with my grandsons who are majoring in physics / astrophysics.

[@rayraycthree5784]

Magnets and electrostaticly charged objects exert contiuous, measurable, attractive or repulisive forces on certain, relatively close materials but electromagnetic implies an energy that oscillates between a potential voltage field and a magnetic field while radiating from its source at the SOL through the medium of space time.

[@anieshroy]

Looks like Everything in this universe is stuck in unending loop . And Nothing can be proven absolutely .The universe is a mere appearance, and reality is hidden.

[@freshpanda7194]

Well said

[@hibbs1712]

But reality is not hidden, that's what's coming to a head here recently. We can see gravity's extra-dimensional-fabric-like qualities. Yet, we are struggling with scientific observation in the face of the unmanipulatable and unobservable. There might literally be nothing we can do with these extra-dimensions, barr creating black holes or gravity wells 50,000 years from now. Science is coming to the point where we will have an answer on whether or not quantum science is anything other than a study on hypotheticals, soon

[@austincriswell8480]

"The universe is a mere appearance, and reality is hidden" i have been trying to put that into words for a long time, thank you!!

[@zolexDackery]

Reality is saying the same thing...

[@nighthawk4028]

This is what hindu scriptures and philosophy have thought about universe. This universe has existed and will continue to exist, the maya( illusion) is base of universes, Shiva(matter) and Shakti ( energy's) are responsible for appearance of universes. They also mention of multidimensional and 5:31 multiple univers interlinked. You will never know the true nature because it's keeps evolving. Great importance is given to akash ( space) and dance of matter and energy. Anyway we have come a long way in understanding the mystery. Hope we will have clarity and brake the illusion.

[@charlesemond7916]

Centrifugal force opposes gravity

[@rrj6068]

A graviton detector will also make your car go fast .......

[@Tairngire-rb7te]

Ah, a marvelous spectrum of infinitum and yet more to learn despite our lifetime. An adept observation to share here. Extraordinary content for a view alongside this quarter of an evening. Delightful nonetheless." :TBa

[@PioLisieux]

Surely there's deeper more pround 'levels' of reality that we are not privy too.

[@Antony-ng9yj]

Yeah, I don't like how they keep things secret but shares with a few. It's not like we are going to do anything with the info other than add to our knowledge.

[@Vile_Entity_3545]

Prove it

[@Antony-ng9yj]

@@Vile_Entity_3545 prove what? Knowledge or kept knowledge, or speculation of the deep unknown.

[@PioLisieux]

@@Vile_Entity_3545 There's so much unknown and unseen. I'm not making a philosophical or religious statement. Just one of intellectual speculation. There's clearly more out there that we don't know than we do. If you need something to illustrate, *DARK ENERGY* *DARK MATTER*. It seems to be a greater reality but we *cant prove it* - only infer it. Surely, there is more to reality than our limited human senses and intellect can grasp. Thanks for engaging Vile_Entity

[@julius7949]

@@Vile_Entity_3545 im not a genius nor am i well versed in this but havent scientists transported qubits of information (i think that's corret?) through another "dimension" of space?

[@tonyjohnson8929]

These simulations recreate and represent on the larger scale. Electromagnetism, strong, and weak forces, though they are magnitude more powerful than gravity, their properties are mainly observed to interact in the quantum realm. Did that explanation do anything for comprehension? Hope so.

[@sonarbangla8711]

String theory might explain the great attractor, with great Repeller as the big bang in which strings emanate out to the web and the string recoil to form the next cycle of Penrose's CCC.

[@paradigm-gauge]

I have heard gravity explained by the difference between time dilation on the near side of an object vs the rear side of an object, creating a drag that brings an object of smaller mass quicker toward an object of bigger mass.

[@AshtonClemens]

That's 100% it

[@paalmuru9598]

🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉 wow super nice

[@pepsitwsit]

I like the confusion regarding gravity " it's not a force , it's the effect of energy on space-time" and then, for the rest of the documentary refer to it as a force .

[@Pond770]

You know maybe I have a answer or maybe I don’t but definitely I have a insane imagination:)

[@gregoryallen0001]

1:02:19 super nice graphic

[@PrashantNanda]

वर्तमान एक कृती हैं जो आकृति को संमातर करती हैं मतलब यह अनंत और निरंतर हैं पर यह अनेक नहीं हैं । वह खुद ही जुड़ती और छुटती है फिर वोह सामान्य हो व विशेष पर एक हैं । #ज्ञान

[@ryoung1111]

You guys need to edit your script. Even a casual listening reveals a number of errors. Also, you use a completely implausible graphic of a black hole in several places that misses the point of the accretion disk’s deflection effect. Cmon, guys!

[@thaidenthach9806]

I think about this all the time. Like how we have currents in the ocean. Space time is also like currents. They smash and rub against each other. Squeezing Gas into to stars. Water seems harmless, but when you get into certain depth, it can crush you to jelly.

[@robertpotvin8872]

gravity is a force ,and even if a mass does,not moove ,it still have a gravitationnal pull,,no matter what is the speed of the planets,traveling around the sun,, there gravity pull is directly related to their mass !🤔

[@eldraque4556]

so as the Universe expands, it's entropy increases as a result (more space, more possible configurations)?

[@No0dl_e-g2i]

as time goes on, the entropy increases. i guess it could be seen as correlating to more space meaning more possible configurations thus resulting in greater entropy yeah i mean at leaast on an intuitive level it makes sense, however entropy presents itself in any and all systems found within the universe that operate over time.

[@eldraque4556]

@@No0dl_e-g2i i was pretty good at physical chemistry at uni and although we used entropy a lot, it's meaning less so, especially on cosmological scales. or time. Its like the expansion causes time, but then time like mind is fundamentally change ie difference as Deleuze would put it

[@ShopperPlug]

10:55 - So what does LIGO detectors are finding about gravitational waves, they've said they detect many gravitational waves all the time, so what is the difference between a "graviton" and gravitational waves? Is gravitational waves a group or a large sum bundle of gravitons? If so, it shouldn't be that complicated to figure out a thought experiment which can be applied in a lab to measure a single garviton.

[@TomisaMaker]

it is similar analogy to a light wave and photon. There are some "measurements" based on some other relations such as Einstein-Plank constant and relations (which i have read some time ago), and we have some hypothetical wave-lenghts and energies of graviton you mentioned - as a thought experiment.

[@amoremorte3330333]

Well for those who think gravity is a force ...understand that it is not gravity that holds us to the surface of matter but it's actual " down" . The curvature of space / time caused by mass . Not gravity, but the dielectric field collapse of an object. Down ...down is hard to wrap my mind around specialy understanding how objects in space know which way is down ?

[@laszlonagy3947]

this video is great example how much they not have a clou at all..

[@ltandrepants]

clue

[@charlesemond7916]

Our discovery of a single new dimension will unlock the understanding of just the one and not all. Therefore the keys need new approaches to be cut.

[@markkens9]

The entangled granular quantum metric itself supports the point-to-point replication of forces and particles..the metric becomes forces or particles as necessary. The metric structure can be deformed either emergently or under influence, redirecting the trajectories of forces and particles.

[@moe5044]

Great video

[@josecubanosantiago4724]

What if gravity is the result Of the movement Of time itself?

[@oblonghas]

Yes, yes. This is the feeling I have as well

[@RatzoBHarris]

But isn't time a function of movement?

[@josecubanosantiago4724]

@@RatzoBHarris time is the relative measurement of a secuence of events wich is constantly MOViNG forward

[@josecubanosantiago4724]

@@RatzoBHarris I’m not good at Math enough to prove it but i feel it that way

[@julius7949]

but time stops when the gravitational force is strong enough and if there's no time moving there then gravity would not emerge

[@mikeycurtin5017]

The first 10 minutes were mostly a repeat of what was stated in the first 2 minutes

[@OnlyJalenPhd]

Thank you. You saved me from losing 10 minutes of life. 😅

[@mikeycurtin5017]

@@OnlyJalenPhd 👍🤣🤣🤣

[@metaparcel]

Its already known gravity isn't a force.

[@robertpotvin8872]

@johnny71c-f4s wrong ,it,s gravity that as an effect on time and space !

[@keep_walking_on_grass]

​@@robertpotvin8872 isn't it the mass that affects time and space and that effect is what we consider gravity?

[@robertpotvin8872]

@@keep_walking_on_grass well,,once resting on the surface of a mass ,time is zero (no more traveling ),but still objects on that mass are beeing attracted ,,,hold a significative weight isn,t it a force that you have to fight to keep holding it,suspend a weight by a spring ,that weight will relatively pull down on that spring why is that?if this is effectively time and space changes by the presence of a mass that is creating gravity ,that gravity act like a force ,doesn,it? so for me gravity is a force! n,b, space for me is filled with something,,because you cannot bend the void ,,if a mass bend space that space as to be something,dark matter maybe??🤔

[@gcoffey223]

Isn't it a fundamental force?

[@kevinlemon6537]

I personally think that gravity is a attractive force . Gravity as described is a spacial pressure . The more massive a body the more pressure can be applied .

[@johnbrimmer9403]

Back inbthe 90's a brilliant Argentinian came up with ads cft correspondence, ide love to expand that into multi dimension maths. Maby each dimension requires specific maths. and the truths are in there relationships and correspondence

[@No0dl_e-g2i]

multidimensional math exists in string theory

[@unnikrishnannairkrishnannair.]

It is energy form. Mass at distance attached by higher mass releases heat

[@shanehumphrey4827]

Gravity is a Material/element that has modified/morphed or is a natural element that is super heavy or could be as light as weightless. ! BUT IT HAS A PROPERTY INNITS STRUCTURE THAT IS ATTRACTED TO EVERYTHING!! Simple as that !! THE PROOF IS IN MAGNETISM ! If a magnet can attract ferrous metal then there could be another item that attracts everything

[@Critical-Thinker895]

Since Gravity is not a true force then I often wonder why Physicists insist it has to be described in Quantum Physics.

[@amoremorte3330333]

Here is another , if you had a tube full of water and you pull the plug you get a spinning funnel shape. Much like a black hole . So why is a black hole seen as a flat warping of space and not a funnel shape?

[@robertpotvin8872]

sending a spacecraft near a planet or even the sun using NEWTONS LAWS with a little correction of EINSTEIN RELATIVITY does perfectly the job,, this in relation with the size of the object in space,,,what if the object is infinitely small with infinite mass, wich laws then could be applyed,??🤔

[@nnonotnow]

Overview of Gravity Gravity is a fundamental force of nature that attracts all objects towards each other. Its strength depends on the mass of the objects and the distance between them. Here are some key points about gravity: * Universal Attraction: Gravity acts on all objects, regardless of their size or composition. * Strength and Distance: The gravitational force between two objects increases as their masses increase and decreases as the distance between them increases. * Acceleration due to Gravity: On Earth, gravity causes objects to accelerate at a rate of approximately 9.8 meters per second squared (m/s²). This means that a freely falling object will gain speed at a rate of 9.8 m/s every second. * Kepler's Laws: Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion describe how planets orbit the Sun due to gravitational attraction. * Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation: Sir Isaac Newton's law of universal gravitation mathematically describes the gravitational force between two objects. * Einstein's Theory of General Relativity: Albert Einstein's theory of general relativity provides a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of gravity, explaining it as a curvature of spacetime caused by mass and energy. Gravity plays a crucial role in the formation and evolution of stars, planets, galaxies, and the universe as a whole. It is a fundamental force that shapes our understanding of the cosmos. * themirroronline.com/2023/05/03/gravity-matters-understanding-the-physics-of-space/

[@marksoffian5568]

I keep falling for this. Most accidents and mishaps are blamed for this invisible something else.

[@timmiller2476]

Einstein himself said to not rely on the geometric interpretation to describe gravity.

[@charlesemond7916]

I believe dimensions are unlimited.

[@mitseraffej5812]

1:05 “ Everything we think we know about gravity could be wrong” I’m sure everything we think we know about most things are either wrong or incomplete.

[@user-wy4mp9ts3u]

What if gravity was a results of slight variations in the attractive and repulsive electromagnetic forces which we have normally believed to be equal and opposite,cancelling each other out,that if the attractive forces where slightly stronger than the repulsive forces which would be almost impossible to detect them being so weak and impossible to block all matter being equally attractive despite charge variations which can not neutralise the underlying effect

[@jamesruscheinski8602]

might gravitons form at surface area on event horizon of black hole? carry quantum information in each Planck area?

[@terryredbourne1385]

Newton described gravitation as a universal force, and claimed that "the forces which keep the planets in their orbs must [be] reciprocally as the squares of their distances from the centers about which they revolve." I believe he was very careful to not describe gravity as an attraction, repulsive, differential or any other descriptor due to not having the evidence to support any descriptor. Why anyone would put forth some sort of magical "attraction" theory between celestial objects is I can only guess they had(/have?) an agenda to stall the discoveries of correct (complete) laws of universe physics. What about all the energy being emitted from all the stars in the universe, moving in literally every direction at the speed of light and due to being in motion for billions of years, be a sort of " push" force so that there would be a differential of these push forces between any two celestial objects? I can easily imagine that happening. Even if it isn't correct, at least it could be a possible solution. I know of no theory on the mechanics of how an attractive gravitational force could work. Doesn't anyone else see the errors that have been made? How does no one else notice the flagrant incomplete assumptions that are quite routinely made? Like the M&M exp. Showed no interference pattern so it's assumed it is the correct experiment to perform and therefore assume no aether and therefore assume red-shift is a Doppler effect and then the big assumption that the universe is expanding. Again, is this really not obvious to everyone? Light("EM") energy cannot be digital. Do the math!. It can only be a wave therefore there must be, I believe, a medium for all that energy bouncing around around the universe for only God knows how long. Big bang, what an utterly ridiculous theory. I really believe and hope all those involved in this "conspiracy" will be found out and be very embarrassed and/or roll over in their graves. Unfortunately, these people seem to have a stranglehold on this scientific institution so we may not have the correct laws for a long time, which is extremely unfair for the human race.

[@Kuwaitisnot_adeployment]

😂 he said "there may be 10 dimensions, OR EVEN UP TO ELEVEN!" 😂😂 like ten is plausible but 11 is where we draw the line 😂

[@lassoatrain]

If gravity is a force then so is inertia because what ever scale you use to measure gravity and use the same scale to measure inertia they are directly related .take away from one will increase the other by an equal measure.

[@SuperYtc1]

Gravity is not a force. It’s an illusion of geometry.

[@jamescole3524]

vibrational shockwaves from star activity which becomes compressed around a solid object in that space and warps it pushing downward toward the center of that object...i cant believe that people think the higgsfield is just there...ask what powers the field and you can figure out everything backwards...dont just look at the result of it and just say duh

[@costrio]

If I drop a pebble into a glass of water, it displaces the water in the glass. Rasing the water level level then would increase the density at the bottom of the glass due to pressure gradients of water being denser at 100ft than at the surface of a body of water, for example. What if matter displaces space and gravity is the equivalent of some kind of surface tension on a grander scale? A whirlpool displaces water and time is affected by the distance it travels? Lots of food for thought there, perhaps? I have long wondered if space might be equivalent to a liquid, perhaps. So maybe gravity isn't a force so much as an effect of space/time. If a light ray must travel around a massive galaxy/object(s) it has to travel a longer distance. Traveling a longer distance takes time. To stay at 186 Kps but the speed doesn't change means that time must change. If a one second is longer than the last, then time slows down around the object. Does time stop at 186 Kps? Maybe the light ray has already reached its destination "relative" to the rest of the univers. If an object passes through it original flight path, that path must bend and affect the energy level of the light beam and shift to the red side of the spectrum from an observational point of view? I alos believe in the fluidity of thought. If you got this far, good for you. Keep thinking, especially if you disagree with my speculations. Good for you. ;-)

[@JungleJargon]

Gravity is the result of the formation of matter with mass that quantifies time and distance.

[@TimothyChase]

"Everything we think we know about gravity may be wrong.". Next video!

[@danielallington5152]

Touche'. It's about time someone brought this up. Electricity & magnetism DO work in space at large distances (e.g. cosmic web being electromagnetic filaments connecting galaxies, stars & planets.)

[@mohammadsareh4732]

Gravity is the result of difference in motions

[@zhavlan1258]

New technologies, new research tools Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope, fiber optic 500‡2». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 500000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 94/94/94 cm, and the weight is 94 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta)

[@apollo-r5z]

Quantum foam is merely the fluctuations of spacetime-gravity. The universe not yet being able to decide whether to come into existence or not.

[@Ryantravisaol]

10:50 so a "graviton detector" is exactly a turbo charger for an internal combustion engine? What the hell?

[@charlesemond7916]

The force of gravity is what comprised the force that preceded the so called big bang and its separation into individual galaxies.

[@Ai-he1dp]

Problem is some don't like infinity, it breaks their brain cells, so if that might be the issue it will have to wait.

[@charlesdrury9712]

It does not make sense when you think atrophy creates gravity one super reason you’re saying the planets stars the galaxies create atrophy so intern it creates gravity there’s no logic in that because it takes gravity to create stars in in the plants along with the Higgs boson and virtual particles which is a little more complex I could be wrong I think any intelligent man will admit he can be wrong

[@charlesdrury9712]

🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷🇱🇷

[@Henri-y8t]

Hi,as I say hope the communauty start to figure out I did not create hypotheses and theory juste for fun 😎 Philippe Martin so we can finaly do lots of stuff that humanity needs big Time,

[@MarkHonea-dx6mv]

Gravity is electromagnetism. It isnt dispersed homogeneously throughout timespace. Celestial bodies are the result of areas of increased gravity.

[@SeiroosFardipour-sy3sh]

Better to say as Nassim Armenian mentioned to call it space_ memory and yet to go beyond dualities memory happens in virtual space and entanglement happens in virtual space though there is only one base ground that name rest to be defined .

[@costrio]

For years the term "Einstein said/found/thought:..." I think his name may been used to say, "The science is settled" by some folk perhaps? It seems to use the "Monty Python" insinuation, "Nudge, nudge! Wink, wink! Say no more! Say no more?" Seems a bit congruent to me, maybe.

[@Kennith-sv9ve]

Just opinion maybe .the galaxies had maybe a bigbang.or came to be from singularly. Not the universe in its whole maybe all galaxies have a specific orbit .

[@TomisaMaker]

They do.

[@misbfa1]

At 10:50 why are you showing a car turbo charger as a planet sized Graviton Detector?

[@khairulnaeim756]

Expand of knowledge is not just study same subject with section still unknown or needs more details...some of it because try to find human every day problem... solution , example energy, today already found use magnetic rotation not fusion nukes....🥸...time move... try to find something probably solution rather than reach unknown...but good for extra knowledge...I think the foundation of this knowledge was,that person have reason to find answers other words they have objective.... rather than blind... not objective to expand more but have reason for benefits humanity...that make them forward...not this day they missing real objective... just opinion

[@dyvel]

Gravity only attracts objects with a positive mass

[@juliuspekar7620]

at time stamped 3:55, thats was other things he talked about, which not part of his theory of relativity

[@RiddimLuv]

We don't understand our own reality..how are we ever gonna know what is real and what is not?

[@materialmirage]

The profundity of this information is severely stifled by the redundant Walmart advertisements.

[@slyy4096]

As "Interferometer" is not pronounced "ainter..." then "LIGO" should be "LIGO" not "LAIGO"

[@Captain271FD]

What AI bot made this? Seriously, finished product is not bad at all!

[@costrio]

What if space is a fluid? Someone bellyflops in the deep end of the swimming pool and other people experience the waves that travel back and forth until they settle down again. A supernova creates gravity waves just like a bellyflopper in a pool? The Higgs field sounds like a fluid too. It increased gravity when accelerating just like a motor boat can only go so fast on the water due to drag. Does the Higgs field also slow down time, I wonder. A whirlpool in a water can lock flotsam into circular orbits around the center. Is gravity merely accelaration created by planetary flotsam? A fluid universe opens up more questions, I think.

[@dreddj]

Is Gravitational effect Quantised? Hence, its near absence at sub-atomic levels.

[@rewardsoverwater7821]

Was it behind a space ship?

[@gloriamadaffari5404]

There is no possible way that earth is the only planet with life forms. To think that it is would be as outrageous as the flat earth theory was.

[@debnorris110]

So I'm guessing AI Will figure this out and advance our understanding by 100's of years. A new physics is coming. i wonder if it will include Tesla's energy frequency vibration to Einstein's calculation to explain how gravity affects the fabric of space-time model and that relationship to space, time, mass, and energy.

[@costrio]

What if acceleration in a Higgs field are the cause of time dilation during acceleration. If one accelaters there is an increase in mass (not weight) Mass is energy. Accelation is caused by an increase of energy. Moving at a steady rate does not increase mass further but mass increases by adding energy to the system? Mass displaces the Higgs particles? Increase of Higgs particles slow down time relative to the rest of the universe? Gravity is an increase of mass disrupting the Higgs field, perhaps? The Higgs field is displaced by the Earth's mass, perhaps, and layered like an onion at different densities? A falling object falls in an acceleration pattern disrupting those fields which picks it up at every stage as it gains acceleration mass? Sorry about this, but I think I have enough "fuzzy logic" to write a detailed scifi story, maybe? ;-)

[@dentonfender6492]

I question the concept of the "we". The future is unknown, and "me", and the "we" of the human community in which I reside are so short lived that more than likely none of "us" as a "we" will see any of this future that is so vehemently promised in the many documentaries that have been produced over the decades. Therefore, all documentaries describing the future are purely entertainment for "me". There is no "we".

[@charlesemond7916]

Gravity is what made up this singularity

[@suemullinax6664]

Could the elusive “graviton” be dark matter?

[@arielperez797]

The mind is all...the all is mind.

[@paulmicks7097]

Gravity is not a force, it's a field , thought that's been settled ?

[@charlesemond7916]

It’s not in development but rather always was and matter is being attracted by the fabric

[@patrickandrews8714]

Gravity, a null particle phenomenon? Or super single particle?

[@VRTechSims]

You mean Aether waves? Like the first dude was right? Lol... gravity is Aether displacement. Aether is quantum based.

[@robertpotvin8872]

in a way ,,AETHER is the invisible dark matter, yes mass displaces that matter creating gravity ,maybe ??

[@amoremorte3330333]

If it is an electricmagnatism, then why is it not a tyroid ? You can find tyroids everywhere in matter . From the smallest to the largest , and I guess the reason for the spin of most items.

[@Pond770]

It’s like 2012 old news

[@patrickandrews8714]

Horror story movie about a gravity experiment with particle entanglement being the theory; is it going wrong after going right with everything coming apart!

[@robertpotvin8872]

usualy gravity is related to mass ,and mass is related to the size of the object,( this is thrue with planets and suns and most stars ),but when they talk about BLACK HOLES sometime they say in the center of it there might be a singularity and the gravity is at the extreme,,,well what is going wrong in them,,and what about the singularity of the BIGBANG ?🤔