Tilak Doshi: Canceled by Forbes | Tom Nelson Pod

[@SolvingTornadoes]

Maybe the time has come to start taking legal action against the people that are discriminating against us for our beliefs.

[@stephenbrough8132]

Paul B say's wind turbs are useless after 15 yrs, shows Danish graph data indicating cost more to maintain by then than they produce.

[@Nuts-Bolts]

Just a comment to boost the YT algorithm of relevance.

[@pederjohansen2029]

Tom Nelson, CDN, Heartland Institute, Paul Burgess and many others of the climate realists need higher subscribers and views

[@stephenbrough8132]

yes indeed. PB has the best condensed info imo. playing them all right from the start. many 2 minute gems.

[@jamesdellaneve9005]

Shadow banned. Tom has the best in the field as well as experts outside of the disciplines.

[@eirikraude854]

Yet another super video from Tom Nelson!:)👍👍👍

[@Christian_Leuchtenberg]

Excellent discussion. Thank you Tom and Tilak. 👏

[@padraigadhastair4783]

Excellent guest Tom. You keep hitting them out of the park. Keep up the great work.

[@brutter602]

Keep up the great work . The REAL truth is getting out there .

[@tomnelson2080]

@@brutter602 Thanks!

[@kabaduck]

I'm with this guy, I'm a climate model denier to; every time they write a paper and publish an article I find that they've taken actual classical data which they statistically clean and then statistically normalize using techniques that no professor of mine would have ever approved of then they feed it into a model in generate what I call synthetic data which they write their papers on along with interpretations and conclusions Reminds me of the mud pies that we used to put together when we were five or six years old and then tried to go around house to house selling it

[@orsoncart802]

Tom! 😁👍👍👍

[@mike1117777]

Great

[@WhetScience]

Mr. Doshi, Thank you for differentiating between "old environmentalism" 'vs' "new environmentalism. That replacement of green space is considered "green" is a cartoonish fallacy. It's like Jessica Rabbit hitting Roger over the head with a frying pan and throwing him into a trunk so he doesn't get hurt! that makes sense for Loony tunes, but I guess I'm an "old environmentalist" that expects things to make sense.

[@davidwynne2005]

There is no such thing as "Government support"..

[@SmallWonda]

I have to wonder (as I seem to spend all my time doing these days!) at publications like Forbes, The UK Telegraph & Mail - don't they think their once loyal readers notice how the publishing landscape has changed? Or do they really hate their readers that much, that they don't care, they would rather follow the assigned Narrative rather than present a variety of opinions, research and findings. Look to Florida & the Dept of Health's new guidelines - maybe independent minded writers & publications could find safety down there?

[@rikardengblom6448]

Thanks.

[@brutter602]

Main stream media should be recategorised as the “Lame Stream Media”!

[@tim2muntu954]

According to Smil, around 1870 battery power density was 10 Wh/kg. The best batteries today are around 500 Wh/kg - have heard of 700 Wh/kg - not sure if they are scalable or economic. therefore 70x increase in 154 years. The modern go-to Moores law comparison so beloved of "renewable energy" advocates, Wikipedia shows since 1970, 1000 transistors on 1 chip, to 50 billion in 2023, a 50,000,000x increase in 54 years. (By way of additional comparison, gasoline and diesel are approx. 12,000 Wh/kg.) Batteries were widely felt to be the future in the early twentieth Century, as, like fusion, they are in the 21st. So far, always for the future.

[@janicemoore30]

Moore's Law is not applicable to battery tech. The physical constraints are too dissimilar. Mr. Doshi said that the "learning curve" is most likely "petering out" for battery tech. Regarding battery density, he said at ~ 35:07, "It's hard to see batteries playing a major role ... in the foreseeable future."

[@dks13827]

Paid by oil companies ??? yeah right.

[@kayakMike1000]

Hmmm. Doubling the energy density of batteries? Are you considering cost density? There were the liquid metal batteries that seemed interesting, round trip efficiency around 80% and they dont wear out. Still they cost 200 per kw HR.

[@janicemoore30]

He was considering the PHYSICAL limits. By the way, "round trip efficiency" is a uselessly vague term.