So glad you're giving attention to the minor parties like Reform, Greens, and Tories.
@lipschitzlyapunov6 ай бұрын
😂
@michaelathanasiou20306 ай бұрын
Reform's policies are CONTRACTS, so when he fails to deliver you can sue this complete MORON
@jalapenogorilla55076 ай бұрын
Now this does put a smile on my face
@moonshot90566 ай бұрын
You mean the greens and the Tories.
@Kcriton6 ай бұрын
This was funny the first time you posted it, not the second or third.
@DavidBennettPiano6 ай бұрын
It's easy to make promises when you know you won't have to keep them
@rogerbennett96416 ай бұрын
You mean if you're a politician.
@andrewmackay42376 ай бұрын
@@rogerbennett9641 same thing really XD
@noworriesnoproblems63826 ай бұрын
Labour voter
@rubberduck37886 ай бұрын
It's amazing how many people think all of these Reform promises are extremely well costed and funded, it's pretty mental.
@AK-ru3sg6 ай бұрын
What would you do?
@recklessnova94906 ай бұрын
I was genuinely shocked when the small boats graph came up, that a lot more than what’s portrayed by the media.
@richymoto6 ай бұрын
Maybe at least parts of "the media" still try to resort to numbers, that can be proven? But maybe you were also shocked, by the 350 million pounds figure on the red bus.
@johndocherty-2736 ай бұрын
Msm hide and disregard any statistics about mass influx and results of unvetted men entering the country
@ionlyfearphobophobia6 ай бұрын
800 yesterday alone. The French navy escorts the boats to British waters, and then sends them on their way just before said illegal immigrants throw their passports and iphones in the sea.
@flammenjc6 ай бұрын
Well contrary to other media narratives, people's concerns are genuine and not fuelled by a hatred for outsiders but the other parties fully addressing it would mean they have to do something about it, unless you're a Tory in which case you'd pretend to do something about it and not do it, because crony capitalism wants and needs cheap labour.
@JamEngulfer6 ай бұрын
It’s basically a rounding error when it comes to the number of people already in the country
@isaacreuben29266 ай бұрын
Count Bin-Face manifesto when?
@bomoose6 ай бұрын
Thames water bosses shake in the Thames mud
@illuminati15686 ай бұрын
He is with reform, mate
@spacechannelfiver6 ай бұрын
we have it already. Thames Water bosses shake in Thames mud. Phoebe Waller Bridge. Claudia Winklemans fringe gets Grade 1 listed. Croissants price capped at £1.10 to account for inflation.
@bomoose6 ай бұрын
@@illuminati1568 knew they weren't serious
@soundscape266 ай бұрын
@@illuminati1568Reform can't buy Count Binface.
@industrialmonk6 ай бұрын
I would love manifestos to be contracts then we can take all these politicians to court for breach of contract but the penalty should be prison + reimbursement of personal & public losses.
@ivancho58546 ай бұрын
Fantasy. Who makes the laws. 🤣
@FeathersMcGraw_6 ай бұрын
Fine but remember your part of the contract is to actually vote them into power. You can't nudge them over the edge with a one seat majority and then expect them to pass every piece of legislation without issue.
@Anon-nv7bp6 ай бұрын
@@FeathersMcGraw_ disagreed. if they have a one seat majority, that's still a majority, and every single point in the manifesto should be implemented. every MP that votes against the manifesto of their party should be tried and imprisoned for lying after signing a contract saying they'd implement their manifesto if elected. Politicians need to be held accountable. there's no reason for manifesto's to just be promises rather than legally binding policy.
@FeathersMcGraw_6 ай бұрын
@@Anon-nv7bp MPs are accountable to their constituants, not their parties. The MP of Hartlepool and the MP of Tottenham might both be Labour but they'll have very different priorities because their constituants have different demands. Additionally a party with a small majority has a large opposition which has more tools too disrupt the government's agenda. For example if the Conservatives want to build a train line through Tory constituencies they'll have little problem, but if they want to go through Lib Dem or Labour constituencies they're going to face much more opposition from those MPs or councils.
@carastewart31016 ай бұрын
I agree that the party should be held responsible for broken promises. What is the point in them making claims about what they will do and then never fulfilling them. Basically, we're rewarding the ones who tell the sweetest lies.
@Snufflegrunt6 ай бұрын
Correction: The boats didn't start arriving in 2020. They've been a thing since the Arab Spring and really took off when the Libyan, Syrian and Daesh wars started. So... over a decade.
@NsnnsBabna6 ай бұрын
Older than a decade. They flooded englands cities first with Jamaicans and other Caribbean males straight after ww2. Thr middle east was first flooded in 1970. They strategically spread them equally.
@nathanstuart36776 ай бұрын
@@NsnnsBabnamost Caribbeans came to the UK legally because they were colonial citizens
@janetmalcolm61916 ай бұрын
@@NsnnsBabnaMost find better places to go and don't blame them. Not that many stay long. Why would you?
@NsnnsBabna6 ай бұрын
@@janetmalcolm6191 not that many stay long ?? Is that your way of justifying why millions have been flooded in ? Your roach. Go to London. Birmingham. Manchester. Leeds. Bradford. Luton. Peterborough. Leicester. Bournemouth. Portsmouth. Southampton. Coventry. The list goes on, and tell me they "don't stay long" You creature
@RammingSpeed-lk8kk6 ай бұрын
That's why we need Cons and Labour OUT!! Both WAR parties and they are hollowing out the fabric of this country too
@finnle54326 ай бұрын
Farage: "Manifesto" means "lie". TLDR: Let's see Farage's "manifesto".
@AA-pk6fo6 ай бұрын
@@KSzkodaGames let's not forget that when you reach that far you start eating your own ass
@mattyriddelltarot32776 ай бұрын
Trump and Putin are friends?
@Jay-xr3sb6 ай бұрын
@@KSzkodaGamestrump is friends with putin because cnn told u
@teelo120006 ай бұрын
I'd never heard politicians policies called "manifestos" before. I'd always associated that word with the wall of text mass criminals write to try and justify their actions.
@Steven-vo4ee6 ай бұрын
@@KSzkodaGames Trump's views on and admiration of the RU President are hardly confined to CNN. "Genuis", "very savvy" and "peacekeeping" come to mind of Trump's descriptions of the RU President and his recent international 'adventures'.
@MarkPTP70006 ай бұрын
'Today was the best Conservative budget since 1986' - Nigel Farage, 23/09/2022 (the day of Liz Truss' minibudget)
@abuibu6 ай бұрын
No one knows if it was a good one as it was scrapped immediately after people panicked seeing the pound devalue. They should've stuck to it for it to be judged fairly.
@Helania126 ай бұрын
@@abuibu You can not cut taxes and at the same time not cut the Budget with her plan which required a lot of borrowing to compensate for it. Her plan was stupid it could have worked if she was honest and said that she also had to cut healthcare the school budget and much more to afford it but she did not she only canceled stuff that was already in progress but she did not cut anything. She would have had to borrow a lot of money to afford her budget so the market reacted negatively and her Government collapsed its as simply as that no one sabotaged her she was just incompetent.
@Alex-fm5ke6 ай бұрын
@@abuibuthe U.K. lost £1 trillion from its pension funds due to the mini budget crashing the £, increasing bond yields making government debt more expensive. It was unfounded tax cuts for the most wealthy at a time where normal people were struggling and public services have been decimated. Why would anyone keep those policies in place when we know trickle down economics doesn’t work.
@Alex-fm5ke6 ай бұрын
@@kevinh4869it shouldn’t have been allowed to happen in the first place.
@jameskilgour3876 ай бұрын
@@kevinh4869 Okay, have a look to see how Argentina's economy is doing under their nutjob ancap leader. It's basically the same as what Truss was trying to do
@margaretpainter38396 ай бұрын
Be no Country left in the year 29
@dwnsdp6 ай бұрын
I read that in the 'it aint much but its honest work' voice
@EddieJones-ts6ub5 ай бұрын
We can hope
@DragonLord199829 күн бұрын
Yes there will be.
@LoganBerry10176 ай бұрын
I didnt expect a Rudy Guliani shout out in a UK party menifesto released in 2024
@bluebelle88236 ай бұрын
I'm vaguely horrified by the thought.
@JeeWeeD6 ай бұрын
"Mister Mayor" needs the money...
@jackster25686 ай бұрын
@@bluebelle8823Only if you think putting people behind is against their human rights... Oh wait, you do?
@NTL5786 ай бұрын
@bluebelle8823 Only because you associate him with Trump administration. He was highly respected for the way he turned New York around. What do you mean vaguely horrified as well? Do you mean 'slightly horrified'? Either way, stop being so English and say what you really mean.
@Kj16V6 ай бұрын
@@jackster2568 Straw man argument moment
@JMEUTEUW6 ай бұрын
People were lied to once and they still believe these politicians... I fear for the future of the UK
@Uno-19686 ай бұрын
Because people vote for the same two parties . Nothing will get better . They are all selfish ignorant greedy pigs .
@rickclaark84596 ай бұрын
Well the alternative would be Stalinism
@_jpg6 ай бұрын
@@rickclaark8459 Didn't know Labour plans to open Gulags in the Scottish Highlands
@krakenmare6 ай бұрын
@@rickclaark8459 because obviously reform's plan of hiring loads of new police and harsher sentences doesn't sound more authoritarian than what most other parties offer?
@LOLE_Editz6 ай бұрын
@@rickclaark8459Reform would probably be closer to Stalinism since the ideology was pretty right wing.
@elmax57486 ай бұрын
How are they still asylum seekers when coming from france???
@elmax57486 ай бұрын
I totally get the draw for the refugees, you want the best life for your family, so likely we would each do the same if in their situation. But equally we should (as current citizens) be able to say no without it being taboo. Open to other opinions :)
@MemekingJag6 ай бұрын
The problem is that individually, migrants are, probably enlarge those you describe, those looking for a better life - and like a queue at the local council, it's no great sin to pick up a ticket from the floor for a single person to jump ahead a bit - but when the entire queue starts doing that, those individual, very minor and even admirable intentions turn into chaos. One person withdrawing money from a bank is regular, and even beneficial economic activity, but when everyone does it, it's a run on the bank and economic collapse. I personally think this is something where we are failed be our biology - we are highly emotionally intelligent, and many can easily empathise with wanting the best shot at life for your family, but we don't naturally have a mind for statistics, which is where issues start to arise around migration. And then there's the issue of contribution - many here have paid tax since they were 16, and "open" immigration allows individuals to receive the allotted privileges (healthcare, infrastructure, standard government programs) without having taken the calculated costs for that system prior to its use. Less money in than money out, there's a leak in the ship and while that won't sink it immediately, it won't cease to be a drain on the proverbial ship of state. Personally, I just feel bad for the many families in the camps on the Syrian/Turkish border who had been waiting upwards of a decade for legal asylum processing. From a simple standpoint of fairness, it's wrong to rewards those that skipped the line than those who have waited incredibly patiently for their own spot in the line.
@blindbrad47196 ай бұрын
That's what happens when your language is one of the most commonly spoken around the world. You'd rather claim asylum in a country where you speak the language better than learning a whole new one.
@briainappressed6986 ай бұрын
They probably want to leave the EU too.
@blindbrad47196 ай бұрын
@@briainappressed698 totally, because it's done Britain so much good 😂
@matthewtalbot-paine79776 ай бұрын
It's nice to see you have such an unbiased take on this. Or if there is bias it's not too egregious.
@CyberController-6 ай бұрын
It's hard not to be biased against those twats, but It's good he can pull it off.
@swattofficer66246 ай бұрын
Its pretty much impossible to be truly unbiased, so its always impressive when people can do their best to remove as much of it as they can.
@potatonator3436 ай бұрын
Reality has a left wing bias@marklastname1993
@matthewtalbot-paine79776 ай бұрын
@marklastname1993 Exactly it's less egregious. Like it's not "they want to stop the migrants because they are a bunch of racists" it's "they want to stop the migrants because they feel there are too many of them" and that's refreshing.
@matthewtalbot-paine79776 ай бұрын
@@swattofficer6624 Exactly, it's difficult to be unbiased but they make a good effort to do so.
@AerrowW6 ай бұрын
Of all the things in this video how the hell does it make sense that the treasury pays the bank of england.
@chrishall98926 ай бұрын
because they pay eachother with imaginary money. its just a government form of laundering. which massively increases inflation. its so much fun
@KaguyaQuincy6 ай бұрын
It doesn't. Might need a reform.
@Truth_above_everything6 ай бұрын
It is true. Educate yourself on the history of central banking and how central banks work. The Bank of England is not part of government, it is an independent public body. It was given the power in 1844 to create pound sterling out of thin air. The bank of england then lends this new created money to the Treasury(a government department) AT INTEREST. Thus explaining why the treasury pays the bank of England. It sounds absurd but its true, look into it for yourself. That's why the majority of Western nations have ludicrous amounts of national debt which they will never be able to pay, because the value of debt is higher than the total value of money in circulation. If you have any questions let me know, but i highly encourage you to do your own research:) Henry Ford himself said: "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning."
@Nick3DvB6 ай бұрын
If the average person understood our banking system there'd have been a revolution by now...
@rogue6 ай бұрын
@@Truth_above_everythingthat was a great fucking comment
@Twiggy1636 ай бұрын
Reform wanting to get rid of the first pas the post system is a surprise and positive imo.
@numberproof72286 ай бұрын
Not quite sure why this is a surprise to anyone. Farage and his previous parties have always supported PR over FPtP. Reform would also benefit massively from a PR system as they have a lot of country-wide support, but its spread out rather than concentrated in particular areas. Under PR Reform could probably pick up over 100 seats, but in FPtP they probably wont even reach 10. Similarly to how in 2015 UKIP were the 3rd largest party by vote share, but only got 1 seat, meanwhile the SNP and Lib Dems got far more seats whilst having less votes.
@Twiggy1636 ай бұрын
@@numberproof7228 guess I missed his earlier calls to replace FPTP.
@Twiggy1636 ай бұрын
@@numberproof7228 Guess I missed his previous expressions of opinion regarding FPTP
@DaBIONICLEFan6 ай бұрын
Proportional Representation sounds great until the party you like ends up in power, then it ceases to sound like a good thing. It also leads to weak governments. Not a good thing imo.
@Twiggy1636 ай бұрын
Must have missed his previous mentions of FPtP.
@karliszemitis33566 ай бұрын
I am still baffled that anyone actually wants to immigrate to UK. Even as a successful professional, the salaries there are about the same as in Baltic states these days, almost anywhere in EU is better than UK to live, isn't it?
@ProsecutorZekrom6 ай бұрын
English is the most common second language to know. Easier to move to a country with the language you speak than learning a new language from scratch especially without the resources to do so
@narvuntien6 ай бұрын
Cambridge university is still one of the best tech universities in the world.
@ivancho58546 ай бұрын
That's why we get an incredible number of illegal immigrants who are a net drain on the economy and then resent the UK after a generation or two. U N D E S I R A B E. 🇬🇧
@ivancho58546 ай бұрын
What's the betting that my comment gets deleted. 😐
@davidpaterson23096 ай бұрын
@@ProsecutorZekrom Thats the key point - and there are many millions of people in the world still being educated in systems and on principles derived from the U.K and therefore much more familiar with it than any other country, a kind of lingering “soft power” of Empire. Anyone who has spent any time in any former colonies in eg Africa (I have) could tell you that.
@luisfilipe20236 ай бұрын
A court that has no real power and anyone can ignore its rulings truly a beacon of international law
@jonathan28476 ай бұрын
Almost no court has ever had any real power over any government.
@pebblepod306 ай бұрын
Yeah, good thing because on Forced Entry & Settlement they side with the criminal (by national law and reasonable ethics), they only care about about the offender, and give no practical alternative solution, just getting in the way.
@pebblepod306 ай бұрын
Like they are armchair polticans, except people listen to them. They have no democratic legitimacy either - I doubt they would be voted for it came to it.
@ianpokemon045 ай бұрын
This is also how the ICC works. Technically the US Supreme Court doesn’t have the powers it uses to decide if laws are unconstitutional but because the US government abides by their rulings, the Supreme Court effectively has those powers. Just like countries that are part of the ICC, they give the court powers.
@luisfilipe20235 ай бұрын
@@ianpokemon04 the Supreme Court has a mechanism to enforce its rulings because it’s a real court enforcing real laws. International law is just a legal fiction
@theoroberts70576 ай бұрын
How do people not see that these policies benefit the rich
@armaan61012 ай бұрын
Thats pretty much every party now except a few of greens, labour, lin dems
@mattharris69586 ай бұрын
As soon as they said "Reject 2 job offers" Yes Prime Minister came to mind lol
@ricardosmythe25485 ай бұрын
People should have to take what's available and if there not happy with it continue to apply for other positions in the mean time. Personally I think job seekers benefits should be stopped if 1 position is refused unless its unfeasible logistically to take it
@ailaG5 ай бұрын
@@ricardosmythe2548do you think that people prefer to live on whatever little welfare can get them, rather than have a proper job that has them better off and prepares their resumé for tough times? Would you be? Would anyone you know be? It's more of a thing you fall into... And feeling that your fall doesn't include punishment from outside may be key to feeling hope and trying to find a way to work rather than live with welfare. Whether it's physical disability, mental, results of undiscovered depression or a plethora of other things. Also, do you know of a shortage in jobs you think they should fill? And if so, won't asylum seekers make up for that? Unemployed people aren't just lazy bums. That's a myth. It may be true for a young adult for 2 months total but beyond that there are good reasons for that unfortunately
@ailaG5 ай бұрын
And I know, though I live in another country, several people with a high level of disability (100% or close to it) getting welfare from social services - so we both will agree they deserve that - who go and seek work not necessarily even for the money. Their lives would have been nicer if they didn't feel like failures on top of their major depression, PTSD, inability to walk etc. But they do try to work and even excel at what they do better. And I see them fail and try again. Because even someone with 100% disability usually prefers to have a job over being dependent. So those people who can't get a job? They tried and life kicked them in the face. Luckily aiding them is not what countries' budgets are spent on
@ricardosmythe25485 ай бұрын
@@ailaG I don't think unemployed people are lazy bums but I do know from personal experience alot of people are happy to claim jobseekers specifically just to top up there dealing or cash in hand money. Other benefits are a different matter but if your on job seekers and your offered a job its not unreasonable to be expected to take the position and continue to apply for others until your in a position your happy with. In some localities it is difficult to get a position and that's fine, you should be able to continue to claim until you can find a position. I'm not blind to reality I was out of work for 6 months years ago but because I had gaps in my employment history where I didn't claim and had shortfalls in NI over that period I wasn't eligible but If I had signed on and claimed those shortfalls should of been met. The benefits system is broken. There are to many people who abuse it and to many who slip through the net who should be able to get help but cannot.
@ianpokemon045 ай бұрын
This is a bad point. If a job isnt safe or doesnt have things you need for disability or want to work with your schedule or for a whole list of other reasons, you should loose benefits. It doesnt make sense to try to force people to get a job doesnt have good pay or benefits. It just allows companies to be worse to its workers.
@Andrew_BIake6 ай бұрын
I would be keen to know Reform's definition of "medical staff". I work in pathology in the NHS and would be keen to see if I fall under the "medical staff" as someone with both a BSc and an MSc in Biomedical Science (effectively, all those blood, pee and whatever other samples clinicians take from you, I analyse, diagnose and monitor you using that). (My student debt currently exceeds 115k)
@burnsnight16 ай бұрын
obviously ALL medical staff.
@wile1234566 ай бұрын
Probably only doctors, as far right snobs see nurses and any care jobs as beneath them and filthy
@Andrew_BIake6 ай бұрын
@@burnsnight1 Yeah, thing is, in politics, most "medical staff" are patient facing staff as people in the labs often get forgotten about as we're not seen by the public. So I somehow believe I would fall through the cracks...
@illuminati15686 ай бұрын
Reforms idea of medical staff is British trained staff that give good jobs to British people. Simple really
@user-op8fg3ny3j6 ай бұрын
@@illuminati1568 lets be honest, farage just means white immigrants
@Grymbaldknight6 ай бұрын
Reform talks a big game, but their policies are actually pretty decent, at least on paper. Wanting to tackle immigration and welfare waste on behalf of the British people are good policies which could actually pay for themselves.
@Grymbaldknight6 ай бұрын
@@DrStrangelove-w9w Do you have a specific justification for accusing Farage of corruption, or do you just not like him?
@Grymbaldknight6 ай бұрын
@@DrStrangelove-w9w Okay, what justification do you have to suggest that Farage would embezzle government funds were he ever to become PM?
@captainweekend52766 ай бұрын
I can't help but think their approach to welfare waste is fundamentally flawed though, 38% of UC claimants are already in work, when you subtract the 29% of claimants that are disabled and unable to work, that only leaves 33% of claimants that are out of work but could work potentially, so the change only targets a minority of UC claimants and does nothing to address the majority of UC claimants. What would actually have a positive effect would be investing into upskilling people who are unemployed by not suspending UC for them whilst they retrain making it a much easier and realistic process, as well as closing loopholes that allow benefit scams to exist. Furthermore would be reviewing long time claimants' eligibility for welfare if they clearly have no interest in working and don't have a disability that prevents them from working. There's no reason why Natalie down the road should live off welfare payments because she wants to pump out five kids and has managed to convince the local authority she's not actually with her man because he only comes over on the weekends.
@itzastralz10306 ай бұрын
There is no welfare waste, and immigration is the only thing keeping Britain's economy... I wouldn't say afloat, but not at the bottom of the ocean.
@Grymbaldknight6 ай бұрын
@@captainweekend5276 33% is still a third of all claimants. Getting them into work will save the government hundreds of millions. Retraining isn't really necessary. Unskilled labour doesn't require training, by definition, which is the sort of profession most UC claimants ought to be pursuing. Plus, training millions of Brits will cost billions more in taxpayer money. Another major problem is that mass immigration is filling out all of the low-skill jobs and driving down wages, which is partly why Reform wants to stop mass immigration. Removing this obstacle will make employers more desperate to be competitive in order to hire native workers, thereby relieving the strain on UC.
@tommann94906 ай бұрын
Sounds perfect to me. Meets the needs of many UK citizens.
@maxresdefault_6 ай бұрын
These videos really have helped my family and friends make their decision on who to vote for. Thank you
@janetmalcolm61916 ай бұрын
Mine too. Won't be Reform.
@blackbird03596 ай бұрын
@@janetmalcolm6191🐑
@18T2206 ай бұрын
If they manage 10% of those promises it's better than the alternative.
@franziskagottwald6 ай бұрын
No
@chudchadanstud6 ай бұрын
@@franziskagottwaldYes
@silvafox77196 ай бұрын
They won't do any of it because they won't get into power. Anyone can promise the earth when they know they don't have to deliver it.
@franziskagottwald6 ай бұрын
No
@imasonite6 ай бұрын
@@franziskagottwald yes
@MrCaerbannog6 ай бұрын
Not sure why, but Farage's insisting on calling it a "contract" rather than a manifesto feels like the kind of thing that Ed Miliband might have done in 2015.
@lrw64476 ай бұрын
🥓
@knightshade26546 ай бұрын
As an American, I think of Gingrich’s policy from the 90s.
@Horichdaslicht18586 ай бұрын
Shades of 2016. Now who was it who said, when exit polls predicted 52-48 for remain, that that result would not be a mandate for remain? "It won't be the finish!"
@Taffsmanlive6 ай бұрын
A small loss against what was an establishment led push across all form of media and 3/4 of parliament would have been a solid result. For leave to actually win the 2016 referendum was undeniably successful
@Horichdaslicht18586 ай бұрын
@@Taffsmanlive Unfortunately Cameron & Osborne conducted a negative campaign, failing to make capital of all the advantages of having a seat at the top table where we were actually nett beneficefies of membership. Improved road lighting, farming and Humberside regeneration to name but a few. Perhaps Mr. Frage should consider that if he takes votes from the conservatives he may open the door to Ed Davey to emerge as leader of the main opposition.
@bonner-qv3mi6 ай бұрын
Great video, The first $100,000 invested was amazing. But when you hit $300,000 it’s like smashing the glass ceiling! I cried.
@rapp-in1mz6 ай бұрын
Nice. People often underestimate financial advisors' importance. Over 50 years of data reveal that those who work with advisors typically earn more than those who go it alone. I've been fortunate to work with one for 13 years, resulting in a $1 million portfolio, largely from early investments in AI and other growth stocks.
@bonner-qv3mi6 ай бұрын
I've been considering but haven't been proactive. Can you recommend your advisor? Could really use some assistance.
@bonner-qv3mi6 ай бұрын
I looked up her name online and found her page. I emailed and made an appointment to talk with her. Thanks for the tip
@DP-ic2lz6 ай бұрын
The Internet is dead
@futurecultleader30606 ай бұрын
@@DP-ic2lz it's really obvious in threads like this, not so easy on the political side, crazy times
@Lowiqpeoplethinktheyresmart3 ай бұрын
Sounds pretty normal to be honest. No country in history who faired well just said “hey if you can make it here we’ll spend a ton of tax money on you and let you do whatever”
@georged70596 ай бұрын
I was planning on voting reform, now I’m 100% going to vote reform
@aaronhuggett18936 ай бұрын
Stop believing there lies
@SpaaaaceMaan6 ай бұрын
@@aaronhuggett1893 You seem knowledgeable from your ability to spell. I trust you have a deep understanding of UK politics. You probably know better than everyone else how the Conservative and Labour party are in-fact wholly different parties; not two sides of the same coin working to game the country to maximise profits for corporations and their friends. Only THEY would never lie to the people, which of course you know. Because you're so knowledgeable, you've done your research into topics beyond your daily field of vision and experience.
@aaronhuggett18936 ай бұрын
@@SpaaaaceMaan sorry, their. I have lost trust in the ability of all our parties. And it’s on them to rebuild that trust because it is an absolute shit show. And also me watching this video is me doing my research, because their manifesto is littered with racism. Our nation is built on migration because the current government have been unable to focus money on teaching our own people to do these jobs.
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
im 100% going to avoid voting reform
@aliceglado6 ай бұрын
The boats are a disgrace.
@Sapiention6 ай бұрын
Why man? They are families from war torn countries trying to be safe, You’re lucky enough to be born somewhere safe, but if I placed you in the middle of Afghanistan you’d give You’re left bollock to go back to the UK, quit being so close minded and have some humanity
@atilla43526 ай бұрын
What's more disgrace that it's possible to create a whole political party and movement around it XD ahhh 2024
@pebblepod306 ай бұрын
@atilla4352 That's a honour not a disgrace. Immigration/high pop growth is the main cause of the Housing and NHS crisis. Also increased crime, and treats the country like a doormat, for what? I also believe in only essential Immigration, and I am an immigrant from my childhood.
@leonardskilroy38695 ай бұрын
@@atilla4352 What's pathetic are people like you defending illegal actions from a violent demographic
@MustafaKhan-fx3ye5 ай бұрын
@@pebblepod30it absolutely isnt
@MrCummings19936 ай бұрын
Nice to hear something seemingly neutral, it's refreshing from the polarised (from both sides) talking points.
@PaulRobertWilden6 ай бұрын
Contract with the people is laughable, 60% of their manifesto will never come to light.
@rdgpromotions60876 ай бұрын
5:50 If this was implemented any problems we have with immigration would disappear over night.
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
you know... they said a similar thing about brexit
@rdgpromotions60875 ай бұрын
@@DodgeThatAttack I’m not that knowledgeable on brexit to be honest so I don’t have any counter arguments for that.
@steffplaysmapping11046 ай бұрын
Looking into from outside Britain, I hope that Labour doesn't get a plain majority and has to negotiate with the pro-PR parties. FPTP is an Anglo-American joke of democracy, which always breeds a two-party system
@joriskuipers41126 ай бұрын
7:05 16th century Spain: "Hold my paella!"
@pebblepod306 ай бұрын
Only on a Gold Standard, all of which have historically failed and not been fit for purpose.
@complete_newb17185 ай бұрын
Tougher sentences for drugs. That's crazy
@1402Jon2 ай бұрын
Good ole Reform UK. Great policies. We have to make Great Britain GREAT again after the silliness of the main two parties.
@Aubrey2004-j4k2 ай бұрын
😂😂😂😂😂
@mikhaelganapolsky7556 ай бұрын
Reform all the way!
@johnnyboy24596 ай бұрын
Excellent Contract! I like it! looking after the hard working indigenous of this country!
@sarahtolliday1445Ай бұрын
Utter rubbish.
@JeeWeeD6 ай бұрын
Contract, ey? Can we sue them then for breach of ~?
@abydosianchulac26 ай бұрын
Now *_that_* is an experiment I'd like to see the courts try
@Kaede-Sasaki6 ай бұрын
If it's a contract, there should be penalty fees for failure to implement within timeframes for each policy 😂⏳️📘📑
@orestesmitas6 ай бұрын
That's how it should work. All parties should be able to be sued for not following through on their manifestos
@harrydavey98846 ай бұрын
That's the point, yes. That would be contractually accountable to the Public.b
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
@@orestesmitas the idea is that you wouldnt vote for them again... but, well, the general public arent exactly the brightest bunch
@Diovanlestat5 ай бұрын
No home office, but who will deal with police, prisions and crime? Strange
@richardbritten4926 ай бұрын
And what is the penalty clause when Reform break the contract?
@MrCalz866 ай бұрын
They lose their jobs it's registered as a limited company making them more liable. Than any otheir party
@maxwild12126 ай бұрын
@@MrCalz86 Erm... and who enforces this? Will they fire themselves, do you think?
@CaptNeeda6 ай бұрын
@@MrCalz86 Being a limited company means they can wind it up and walk away. As they inevitably will when they've sold enough magic beans.
@dkmphotography_co_uk6 ай бұрын
@@MrCalz86you think Farage is going to fire himself for not sticking to his own false promises?? It's a Limited company, he's the majority shareholder. He can't be voted out. There is no accountability. Think of it like the private water companies.
@Mute0404045 ай бұрын
Has anything happened to the Uniparties when they lie & lie again
@motuekarewaka51456 ай бұрын
I think you will find that he emphasised its not a manifesto.
@GrimmAldous5 ай бұрын
I wish you great success in your health, love and happiness!
@mikemcguinness926 ай бұрын
Very good video, will you make a playlist for all the manifesto explained videos?
@ivancho58546 ай бұрын
Great idea. 👍
@Kaede-Sasaki6 ай бұрын
Must include the monster raving loony party manifesto 😂
@philjose58696 ай бұрын
Vote Reform! Save British values
@allaamrauf82145 ай бұрын
Sheep being sheep as usual.
@GamerX13X6 ай бұрын
I love looking at the parties that know they won't win, so they can just say they'll do whatever they want, without worrying about the cost. Fix NHS, increase defense by a full percentage point, more cops, and ect while cutting taxes, by doing all sorts of things that will supposedly save or make a ton of metaphorical money.
@clickrick6 ай бұрын
"Cutting waste". As though successive governments over the past 40 years haven't been saying they'd do exactly that, only to oversee government spending increase, especially on stuff that goes directly to line the pockets of their supporters.
@Platinum_Z6 ай бұрын
Cut the waste in the public sector…
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
far right party making unrealistic promises, blaming foreigners and the poor, and hoping the general public are gullible enough to fall for it? (and it actually working) yeah thats another space off my bingo card.
@David-vn4qu6 ай бұрын
Vote Reform. This country needs change.
@lukeorlando48146 ай бұрын
Your right the country does need change. But only vote reform if your desperate to have change for the worse. This is the guy who’s pedalling hate and lies facilitated the rise of Johnson.
@floatingpeaks45842 ай бұрын
Small boats have been arriving since the Vikings.
@kentonge18126 ай бұрын
Wake up Britain, this is perfect sense.All the best from a 7th generation New Zealander of English descent.
@CCrohny6 ай бұрын
There is a lot of good here, a lot of questionable and some bad. Honestly, like every manifesto it just comes down if you believe they can pull it off. This is why I am in strong favour of proportional representation. Reform have good ideas but they shouldn't solely be in charge of the country.
@basterstw6 ай бұрын
Which ideas do you consider good?
@Tannhauser626 ай бұрын
Reform has changed my ideas on PR. When Tice, the former leader, reckons climate change is down to volcanos, it tells you all you need to know about the party's grasp of data. Lack of PR keeps these anti-science nutjobs out of power.
@andymccallum80906 ай бұрын
@@basterstw cutting inheritance tax and tax in general. stopping ILLEGAL migration, getting rid of regulations. there are quite a few things that i disagree with.
@GDP-hm5ey6 ай бұрын
@@Tannhauser62So you're an authoritarian who doesn't want people who disagree with your personal opinion to have any power?
@Tom-uy6te6 ай бұрын
@@andymccallum8090 I think inheritance tax should be a very large proportion, like 80% or something, or even 100%. Because inheritance is the main reason for unfairness. Also, why cut tax? If you're even paying a significant amount of income tax then you're doing alright in life and probably don't need help from politics.
@xpictos7776 ай бұрын
Smart. I have been saying for years in Australia that we should make medical school free but cap the wages of doctors (perhaps with a lower tax rate). That way you get the people who really want to help and not just ones who want to get rich and drive up health costs.
@DanPhillips-in6qn6 ай бұрын
A constant increase in the size of the population means that with each passing year when your family goes to the beach in the summer, the beach is just that little bit more crowded and its just that little more difficult to find a parking space. It means that with each year that passes there's just that little bit more traffic on the roads, and the queues in the shops are just that little bit longer. Its also just that little bit harder to get a seat on a train on the way home from a long day at work. Quality of life goes down gradually for everyone already here. Besides do we really want less countryside and wild places as more and more houses, hospitals, roads etc need to be built to keep up, if keeping up is even realistic with current numbers coming in that is. This really needs to be brought under control before overpopulation gets any worse, if you havn't given this much thought before please think about it properly. The UK already has the highest population it has ever had in its entire history, if you have kids that will grow up here you should be particularly concerned about this.
@Kaede-Sasaki6 ай бұрын
One child policy? 👶😅 Deport all people with the name starting with Muhammed? Completely random. Not sus at all. 😂
@tpalmer47576 ай бұрын
World population is gonna go down in this century, underpopulation is literally the threat that Europe faces, look at Japan and SK
@Phyt56 ай бұрын
But migrants contribute more to the tax money and take out less benefits than an average Brit, meaning they could use the excess money to improve infrastructure and grow the economy, meaning everyone benefits
@expo55836 ай бұрын
You do realise it's very much a bad thing to have a lowering/stagnant population, right? It's a problem which most likely will start to affect many developed economies in the next few decades, and means more old people who don't work, and less young people that do work, meaning more pressure on said young people. Immigration is a key element of economies, especially in the latter stages of population growth. Also, "The UK already has the highest population it has ever had in its entire history", this is literally the case in any part of the world for almost every country; I don't see why you mentioned this, because of course population has increased every year, that's how population growth works.
@Phyt56 ай бұрын
But immigrants contribute more to taxes than a British while taking less benefits than a British person meaning you could use the excess money they generate to help fund public services and grow the economy, win win
@Tylru6 ай бұрын
When I hear "Contract" I think "Not a real party, just a Limited company". Seems fitting, don't you think?
@Novabug6 ай бұрын
because 'real' parties apparently screw everything up, ref, last 30 years!
@neilbarlow27476 ай бұрын
I will be voting Reform 🗳️ I want Nigel to create some serious waves as opposition
@oxonomy23725 ай бұрын
I mean, sounds pretty good to me
@oxonomy23725 ай бұрын
@is4c_ I’m only old enough to remember Brexit party and UKIP but I can looking before that, what am I looking for?
@socire725 ай бұрын
You want the NHS privatised so that no one can afford treatment? I don’t know if you’re deaf but the manifesto clearly states that’s what they’re trying to do
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
not to me. i think it sounds like an awful way to appeal to gullible people
@The_New_IKB6 ай бұрын
The only thing I disagree with Reform on is scraping HS2
@professorlean37335 ай бұрын
Why is that out of interest?
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
@@professorlean3733 because public transport actually helps people and prevents car dependant dystopia
@darkhorse5056 ай бұрын
Can we give some more attention to the phrase “cutting taxes” Because almost all the tex cuts are not ones that really benefit people. But greatly for the privet sector and big corporations and the rich. “Tax cuts for the rich” Classic right wing policies 🤮
@geewoods65906 ай бұрын
Removing first past the post is such a good idea, everyone can agree on that.
@allaamrauf82145 ай бұрын
Why is it a good idea?
@DaBIONICLEFan5 ай бұрын
@@allaamrauf8214It isn't, it's just what people who haven't done any research think.
@geewoods65905 ай бұрын
@@DaBIONICLEFan educate me xD
@DaBIONICLEFan5 ай бұрын
@@geewoods6590 well have you seen how many hoops governments in Europe have to jump through just to pass legislation? Olaf Scholz leads a *3 party coalition* and is struggling to get a migrant bill through due to opposition from the German Greens. This is what you get with PR; constant coalitions and weak, ineffectual governments that are unable to do anything.
@StormaLorda5 ай бұрын
@@DaBIONICLEFan Here's the idea: I vote for party A, but party B get the win in my area. So everyone that didn't vote for party B -> their vote is completely wasted and thrown in the bin. Actually, also everyone Extra that voted for party B, their vote is wasted too. I mean party B won by 100,000 votes in my area, 99,999 B votes are thrown in the bin. Now we have something like Reform, a party with massive support across the entire country, but not enough support concentrated in certain areas for some reason, probably because people vote for the same party no matter what happens, like it's a fkn football team. I mean, people still vote conservative right now after they ruined the country, for example. So Reform end up getting like 30% of the country's votes, and like 5% of the seats in parliament. Excuse me??? How is this democracy? How is this fair at all? It isn't. Hence the support for removing FPTP. In what world can you just throw peoples votes in the bin and still call it a democracy? You could say, "but it means you always get an MP in your area that most people wanted" - and all I can say is that an MP isn't even a councillor, they don't control the area they "represent." Almost none of them live in the areas they represent. So there's no point on it at all.
@IDubzz6 ай бұрын
Up the reform party 🇬🇧
@Lasherluke6 ай бұрын
My question would be what about the people in low paying jobs that need benefits.
@bloodmagiclord82536 ай бұрын
Well for a start every working person earning 20k or more gets £1.5K per year in their pocket due to the tax-free allowance being raised to 20k. Anyone on over 12.5k per year sees some benefit from it. As for the rest of it, I don't recall anything about removing benefits for those who are working but still need it?
@andymccallum80906 ай бұрын
the word "need" should be removed from political discourse.
@apz2026 ай бұрын
They also want to leave the WHO.
@learningagain40946 ай бұрын
If we weren't in the WHO, then we wouldn't have been hit my mass inflation during Convid.
@jeffdady8646 ай бұрын
It would be the best thing Farage could do by leaving the echr, we can make our own decisions we dont need Brussels to tell us how to behave. Reform.
@sallykat69446 ай бұрын
For those who are voting Reform: if you became unemployed, are you confident that you could find a new job in 4 months? And if so, remember that some people will not be as lucky, due to a lacking of education or experience - do those people really deserve to starve?
@DanPhillips-in6qn6 ай бұрын
Reforms policy is eminently sensible. It is simply that if you are fit and able, and have two job offers and turn BOTH down in favour of staying on benefits, and furthermore if a 4 month period has elapsed , then your benefits would be cut. So the presupposition in your question doesn't work at all because in the scenario where your benefits are cut it would be because YOU have turned down the offer of paid.employment twice. Would you instead say that people who are fit and well and are turning down multiple job offers should continue to be allowed to live a free life that other people work and pay for on their behalf through taxation?
@janetmalcolm61916 ай бұрын
My point exactly. Many will also be pensioners unable to get their pension till 66 and going up.Hard to get a job within 4 months. Where are all these jobs? Money will stop. Sanctioned. Better hope none become unemployed!
@janetmalcolm61916 ай бұрын
@@DanPhillips-in6qnJobs don't grow on trees. Sometimes takes ages though loads applied for. The younger ones had better think about that! More tents will be the result.
@DodgeThatAttack5 ай бұрын
@@DanPhillips-in6qn if only it were that simple. I mean, I wish I had job offers flying through my door every day
@simon1994186 ай бұрын
The guy that breaks your legs and then proceeds to sell you crutches.
@kevoreilly65575 ай бұрын
Explained: Hansel and Gretal meets Mien Kampf
@CS-wl8yi6 ай бұрын
Vote Reform Party! 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@dkmphotography_co_uk6 ай бұрын
If you're extremely wealthy & will benefit most from their tax cuts...
@dallysinghson55696 ай бұрын
Why no one addresses these bold tax cuts claims which all require cutting of services.
@Jan-se1nd6 ай бұрын
A lot are addressing it. Perhaps not the DM et al., but everyone with a brain knows this is economic illiteracy of the worst kind.
@bloodmagiclord82536 ай бұрын
@@Jan-se1nd >Economic illiteracy From someone who is voting for one of the parties who contributed to putting the UK in 2 trillion debt
@orestesmitas6 ай бұрын
A lot of bad services do need to be cut.
@Phyt56 ай бұрын
@@orestesmitassuch as?
@Taffsmanlive6 ай бұрын
There is sizeable wastage in the public sector. Employment in HR and “transformation” service departments has been increasing year-on-year. Cutting that across local and central authorities could save billions. You could probably save £1-3m per local authority. Plus, tax cuts for working people encourage people to work harder and go for promotions. Some people are denied legal support in domestic abuse cases if they earn too much. More people are moving into higher tax brackets, simply because of inflation. You’re literally preventing economic growth by having such high tax rates, which in-term increase tax revenues if you create growth via incentives for people to work more. Please don’t pretend like anyone suggesting a reduction in tax is economically illiterate, just because you’ve read an A-level economics book on Keynesian Theory
@dump55711 күн бұрын
Reform has written these promises in stone, That is why they will get my vote.
@aki_nter8 күн бұрын
You know they are more dangerous like trump, and they are a company who just want your money
@meadandmilk6 ай бұрын
Truly unbiased video, well done. I am going to be voting Reform, but I am still trying to sponge in as much info as I can to make sure I am making the right decision. There needs to be more videos just like yours on KZbin, we have a lot of problems with echo chamber/confirmation bias algorithm these days.
@DrApocalyptus6 ай бұрын
How old are you?
@meadandmilk6 ай бұрын
@@DrApocalyptus Just turned 30.
@allaamrauf82145 ай бұрын
Why do you think voting an even farther right-wing party will be good for the UK? What'll happen when Reform ruin the country even more? Do you plan to go even farther right? Sheep being sheep as always.
@ChadThundercock-cn3ve5 ай бұрын
@@allaamrauf8214 They're all left wing. UK took the most immigrants out of any European countries under tory rule. Labor and tory is both left
@nightshade71113 ай бұрын
Don't do it. They'll wreck our country and make our European neighbours hate us even more.
@oldpal18676 ай бұрын
Vote Reform or never complain about a labour or Conservative government again - EVER!
@georgemcmeechan22846 ай бұрын
In the world of these people Scotland don't even warrant a mention
@34REDCOW346 ай бұрын
can't barrage the farage
@BillHrpr6 ай бұрын
Best of luck to Reform. I hope they get some seats, our country needs them to.
@peter_de_Jong8175 ай бұрын
Did people forget the last time he was in politics? Are his blatant lies forgotten?
@echelon2k85 ай бұрын
And what about Labour with their numerous promises to lower immigration only to consistently raise it? What about all those lies that are now negatively affecting everyone's quality of life except for those currently in power?
@shush65525 ай бұрын
@@echelon2k8labour aren’t in power??!!!
@echelon2k85 ай бұрын
@@shush6552 Yes, they are, they're part of the Uniparty.
@socire725 ай бұрын
@@echelon2k8So your solution is to vote for a party of former tories? And not WPGB or any other actual party?
@echelon2k85 ай бұрын
@@socire72 No, I'm not voting.
@Canada_Matt6 ай бұрын
THESE REFORMS ARE SO SENSABLE! GET HIM IN!
@DangerAngelous6 ай бұрын
Let’s not forget that Nigel Farage has on record said phrases such as “sussy Baka”, “big chungus sends his regards” and “ara ara”
@almasomerville10706 ай бұрын
I dislike Nigel Farage, but be better than this. Make an argument, back it up,.
@DangerAngelous6 ай бұрын
@@almasomerville1070 I’m just stating facts for people to interpret and do what they want with
@lachlanchester81426 ай бұрын
@@almasomerville1070this is true though, there’s video evidence
@clairee49396 ай бұрын
I genuinely have no idea what any of those words mean.
@DangerAngelous6 ай бұрын
@@clairee4939 good, you’re better off not knowing
@OperationsSPOperationsSP6 ай бұрын
We already have a bill of rights and common law, sovereignty, Constitution which has been ignored since 1973.
@JohnRaithby-zh8pt5 ай бұрын
all sounds good to me go reform
@shush65525 ай бұрын
bot 🤖
@julieclonan24276 ай бұрын
Reform are getting rid of the BBC licence fee too 😊
@lp53356 ай бұрын
Sounds liek some sensible policies Vote Reform !!!!
@mrgreatbritain6 ай бұрын
No matter how Reform do in this election, got to give them credit for really reforming themselves (ignore the pun!) since the days of the Brexit party. Although the finances seem a bit ambitious, they have some great ideas and seem to care about ordinary working people than just themselves. Will be interesting to see if they can match or even beat the total scored by UKIP at the height of their popularity.
@ionlyfearphobophobia6 ай бұрын
UKIP got 4 million votes. Opinion polls indicate they'll well exceed that, hitting at least 6.
@mrgreatbritain6 ай бұрын
@@ionlyfearphobophobia great news!
@dkmphotography_co_uk6 ай бұрын
They're a limited company, not a political party, of which Farage is their largest shareholder. Their policies on tax cuts literally aid the richest most. They want to privatise the NHS. Barely anything supports the working class, they just pretend.
@benwratha66286 ай бұрын
I’m so torn for this election 😂. In some instances I agree with reform as they seem to be the only party that actually put immigration as a major issue however I’m very much skeptical about their plans for tax cuts and also the vouchers for private health care. Funnily enough I seem to be torn between voting for the Lib Dems and reform 😂😅
@ionlyfearphobophobia6 ай бұрын
@@benwratha6628 What's the issue with the tax cuts and Reforming the health service to be more like the French?
@a05odst626 ай бұрын
We are being replaced, i just dont understand how so many people can't see that....
@pebblepod306 ай бұрын
I think Reform are much better than Labour or Tory, just my personal opinion.
@-i10076 ай бұрын
Plaid Cymru manifesto, when?
@jameswright42366 ай бұрын
There'll only be one thing in it. Welsh independence.
@aidy60006 ай бұрын
Plaid's two policies; 1. Bum more sheep. 2. Be more Welsh.
@jamesmonkey53146 ай бұрын
@@jameswright4236 The Plaid leader seems to want more immigration so let's send the 700k immigrants to Wales.
@tom-ch5ii6 ай бұрын
@aidy6000 haha sheep joke we are all cackling at this imaginative insult
@quiquemarquez32116 ай бұрын
Would love for TLDR to cover the Scottish manifestos, starting with the SNP's manifesto would be interesting to see their collapse or decline with bald Sweeney at the top, a Scottish Greens manifesto after the fall of the Bute House agreement and their plans and even Alba with Salmond's vendetta in the background.
@GeorgeT966 ай бұрын
Why the hell is the treasury paying the BoE ?! Imagine how much investment into public services could have been made over the years with that £40B per year...
@Phyt56 ай бұрын
Do you really think the tories would invest in public services? Tho I do agree that with labour coming in thy could invest that 40 billion into funding the NHS plus on renewable energy and fixing our infrastructure
@Lockfly6 ай бұрын
Giving more funding to the current NHS would be like fixing a car with ductape. It needs massive reform not more money @@Phyt5
@GeorgeT966 ай бұрын
@@Phyt5 why renewable energy when investing in nuclear would be so much better though. Minimal waste and tons of energy
@Phyt56 ай бұрын
@@GeorgeT96 you can do both, renewables can be installed quickly and cheaply while nuclear can be for the baseline when their is energy fluctuations
@jamescollins60856 ай бұрын
@@Lockflywe're already pouring over 200 billion a year into the NHS I believe. The problem I've been told by every ex NHS worker I've spoken to is that there are far too many people in management positions, and thanks to Brexit, the NHS is now being forced to pay thousands of pounds per day to hire a single agency worker to cover the shortfall in staff.
@carastewart31016 ай бұрын
We do need change. For decades I've watched PM Q's and honestly all I hear is.... Things are broken under your party's reign... Vs .... The previous party broke this, so this mess isn't our fault. This seems to apply no matter which one of the two parties are in control. The population of Britain doesn't want to hear each one blaming the other. We just want the problems to actually be fixed. I shall be voting for Reform UK.
@silvafox77196 ай бұрын
They won't get in and they won' fix anything. They would make everything worse.
@BrazenBull916 ай бұрын
"When people hear manifesto they think lie." When i hear contract i think "trap."
@royalcrowntowing24646 ай бұрын
At least spell "contract" correctly,
@BrazenBull916 ай бұрын
@@royalcrowntowing2464 what do you mean, at least? I'm using a keypad with auto "correct." Fixed it now. Are you happy now buttercup? 🌼
@sftmol6 ай бұрын
In other words Reform policies are exactly what the vast majority of the electorate want. I think they call this concept, hmm, ahh, let me think for a moment: DEMOCRACY!
@phillipwilliams4135Ай бұрын
I’m sold Nigel 👍🏴
@oscarmccoy9102Ай бұрын
You shouldn’t be.
@atrumluminarium6 ай бұрын
Having a time limit on income welfare is surprisingly sensical. I've been saying that should be how my country implements it for ages.
@kianlakchi71826 ай бұрын
Yes but four months is Extremely short.
@abydosianchulac26 ай бұрын
And the restriction on rejecting two job offers makes little sense in societies (speaking from the US) where it's still commonplace to not be told a position's salary till a job offer is made
@johnhandy34836 ай бұрын
@@abydosianchulac2 "commonplace to not be told a position's salary till a job offer is made" - Yeah, no. That doesn't happen here.
@ifs10376 ай бұрын
@@johnhandy3483yes it does lol
@johnhandy34836 ай бұрын
@@ifs1037 Not in a way that would drastically affect you. Not in the way the American was suggesting. We can agree on the semantics. Technically the "Job offer" will have the "Offer" of the pay amount/salary. Most roles in a salaried position have a band you will fall in. You can use glassdoor and other services to get an idea. You could even email and ask "what is the salary range for this" before applying.
@j4m3zflem0076 ай бұрын
Sounds good to me
@staminizecompany6 ай бұрын
Come on Farage! Lead the UK to the splendor she used to enjoy
@MrBrendanrex6 ай бұрын
I think a Le Pen government in France will want to see as many migrants crossing the Channel as possible, I doubt Farage would have any success in persuading France to take any back, or to stop them leaving French beaches. As for deporting more and more abroad to places like Rwanda, hasn't Farage spent the last two years pooh-poohing the Rwanda plan as unworkable?
@ValleysOfRain6 ай бұрын
Knowing Farage, he would probably quietly instruct the UK border force to push the boats out to sea and leave them to the mercy of the waves. "shove it under the carpet and none will be the wiser"
@MrBrendanrex6 ай бұрын
@@ValleysOfRain I don't know he and his acolytes haven't already bought a few boats and sortied out into the channel with a few crates of Carling to show how easy it is to stop the boats.
@georgia62365 ай бұрын
This video fails to mention that Reform's other policies included making hate crimes no longer a criminal offence, scrapping all Diversity, Equality and Inclusion roles within policing, and doing away with the Equalities Act (2010) which protects people against discrimination and harrassment.
@benjamindavidscargill56335 ай бұрын
I’ve got to say as a generally left-wing person the prospect of reforming the House of Lords and introducing P.R. - especially with the state of Labour - is tempting.
@PandaKnight526 ай бұрын
How will the pay for the spending with all those tax cuts ?
@burn_burn_satellite756 ай бұрын
They won’t. We will.
@mutelarsorhougbe46065 ай бұрын
‘Replace’ the human rights act? Med student or not, lost me.👋🏽
@martinknapp76406 ай бұрын
Are there any governments which have ever been able to spend more by taxing less?