"Oh sh!t they're onto us" *moves a lava lamp 1mm to the left* "phew that was close!"
@frostfire5335 жыл бұрын
Angel 2 years and u dont have a comment yet so i decided to change that
@mart18475 жыл бұрын
Angel 2 years one day, and you only have 1 comment so i decided to change that
@person80645 жыл бұрын
Angel 2 years, 1 day, and 5 hours and you only have 2 comments so i decided to change that
@isaachlloyd5 жыл бұрын
Heja Angel, it's been 2 years, 1 day, and 6.3 hours. You only have 3 comments! And broski, so kind of me I know, I just had to change that
@KokkusKonsul5 жыл бұрын
I love the internet, because of comment sections like this
@TomScottGo7 жыл бұрын
This is not a sponsored video. I'll always declare if something is. I just emailed and asked if I could film their lava lamps!
@Tsukiko.977 жыл бұрын
To be honest, you need a high IQ to understand that this video is not a sponsored video.
@thedude36517 жыл бұрын
Do you have to say it's a sponsored video because of British law?
@unknownemrys7 жыл бұрын
KZbin guidelines/rules- you need to disclose sponsored videos
@CybershamanX7 жыл бұрын
This reminds me a lot of that scene from Johnny Mnemonic when they encode 3 random screenshots from the TV in order to encrypt the data stored in Keanu Reeves's head.
@dm4uz37 жыл бұрын
this comment is one week old but youtube says the video was uploaded today are you a time traveler?
@stripethecatsoldier4 жыл бұрын
i can rest easy knowing that i'm being protected by a lava lamp
@zooty63 жыл бұрын
An entire wall of lava lamps
@littlefox_1003 жыл бұрын
Ikr it’s very reassuring
@simonmultiverse63493 жыл бұрын
Java lamps: randomness found on an island in the Far East Fava lamps: randomness due to beans made famous by the film The Silence of The Lambs Cava lamps: randomness due to Spanish wine Lava lamps: randomness found by analysing the glow of a volcano Lava Lamb: a model of a farmyard animal carved from solidified lava Cassava lamps: randomness from root vegetables
@hwoods013 жыл бұрын
all it takes is getting to the software engineer. Compromise him and the lamps are a distraction.
@jarrodrees72723 жыл бұрын
Lavae lampai*
@marcinchaciej7 жыл бұрын
There is no better RNG than a box with a keyboard and a cat inside.
@RICDirector5 жыл бұрын
Disagree. Cat + box + keyboard = sleeping cat on keyboard, generating one or two characters varied only when cat stretches and goes back to sleep....
@gandalf17835 жыл бұрын
onafixedincome What about Some Lion Babys or Animals that give born, and you count how many of them are coming out... 😂
@davidm.46705 жыл бұрын
nah = wall avoidance etc skews # probability
@peteranon84555 жыл бұрын
*shake shake shake*
@Kenionatus5 жыл бұрын
Also usable for quantum cryptography. The cat can both press and not press a button at the same time ;)
@YellowLAVA4 жыл бұрын
You could say, it's a firewall
@pxolqopt35974 жыл бұрын
Firewall from another mother
@Dicaso94 жыл бұрын
Lavawall
@SadikKhan-wt8cs4 жыл бұрын
@@Dicaso9 ooh that's kinda cool ya know
@azuredragonofnether54334 жыл бұрын
That's the most perfect pun I ever heard in my life.
@patstine27414 жыл бұрын
take my like and leave
@spacedoutorca45504 жыл бұрын
I was half expecting him to go “But lava lamps will only get you so far. That’s why I use D A S H L A N E”
@oopsitsdeleted69964 жыл бұрын
Lmao
@MrJason0054 жыл бұрын
Nah, Tom Scott is ethical
@dontspikemydrink93823 жыл бұрын
@@MrJason005 best joke
@MrJason0053 жыл бұрын
@@dontspikemydrink9382 What makes you think Tom Scott isn't ethical?
@dontspikemydrink93823 жыл бұрын
@@MrJason005 i didn't
@evilutionltd7 жыл бұрын
It's certainly cheaper than hiring 256 nerds throwing D16's with hex numbers on.
@MichaelGooden7 жыл бұрын
Now I want a hex d16. Internet, please let this be a thing I can order online.
@neilisbored21777 жыл бұрын
How is anything cheaper than hiring 0 nerds? GET IT? No?
@coolguy284_25 жыл бұрын
@@ferulebezel roll a tetrahedron twice
@serglian85585 жыл бұрын
@@coolguy284_2 or get a d16 and paint it
@happyfakeboulder6445 жыл бұрын
@@neilisbored2177 no, i don't get it
@smartereveryday7 жыл бұрын
Great video
@countingwithjerold4 жыл бұрын
indeed
@romandude77404 жыл бұрын
Ey
@BenjaminAnderson214 жыл бұрын
How does this comment from smartereveryday only have 40 likes!?
@MrJustin21054 жыл бұрын
@@BenjaminAnderson21 Because people dont like a comment just because someone is verified
@duceysanem4 жыл бұрын
@@MrJustin2105 ps I’m joking
@SlayCC4 жыл бұрын
Just use a chicken and some pressure plates
@captaincaption4 жыл бұрын
BuT It'S CoDeD
@maggotmaskstudios71804 жыл бұрын
Bats are more random
@IndigoGollum4 жыл бұрын
@@maggotmaskstudios7180 Bats are harder to catch.
@mobzilla294 жыл бұрын
Nah chickens are too random
@Dragon-xd9em4 жыл бұрын
Villagers are better than chicken
@GnomeWrestler7 жыл бұрын
This sounds like a fact you would tell your friends on a bet to secure yourself a 100% chance of winning, because who would believe the phrase "Cloudflare is encrypting your data by using lava lamps.". This is mindbogglingly simple and genius at the same time.
@mcgaffin45067 жыл бұрын
This would result in a hour-lasting discussion between me and my friends, about how much the chaotic pendulum and the radioactive device counts into the encryption, about how true this phrase is.
@iau7 жыл бұрын
My passphrase is now "Cloudfare is encrypting your data by using lava lamps.". Nobody will guess that!
@felixhultman84107 жыл бұрын
Sounds like something Beret Guy from xkcd would pitch at a company meeting.
@RainaRamsay7 жыл бұрын
+Felix 100% true
@DanieleGiorgino7 жыл бұрын
Pendulum should be deterministic, albeit chaotic. But the radioactive source is true randomness (as random as the universe provides)
@albertbatfinder52405 жыл бұрын
Shouting “The Wall is Lava!!” at that office is the quickest way to get yourself thrown out.
@SanityDrop4 жыл бұрын
Ha. Comedy.
@espen43304 жыл бұрын
Quicker if you throw one on the ground and shatter it, and shout the floor is lava
@copterinx04684 жыл бұрын
@@espen4330 Aw I was gonna say that...
@Hidde_3 жыл бұрын
It's a firewall
@richardmillhousenixon3 жыл бұрын
Are you speaking from personal experience or....
@dang24434 жыл бұрын
I've been there. It's in their lobby at reception, so it's also a gimmicky "cool thing" to have at a tech office. It's not hidden in some back room. It's proudly on display. Having said that, imagine the technicolor carnage when the inevitable (larger than normal tremors) earthquake happens.
@kibe21343 жыл бұрын
They could just move the whole thing to South America.
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
@@kibe2134 South America would have lava for once hehe
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
Wouldn't that make for even more complex encryption?
@raimundohott97163 жыл бұрын
@@kibe2134 South america also has eartquakes.
@Srcsqwrn3 жыл бұрын
Are earthquakes just a normal thing in America??
@alekheuvel98017 жыл бұрын
Doesn't this basically mean that if a key was made during the making of this video Tom would be included in the key?
@Cobalt9857 жыл бұрын
I would assume so but it's not like that matters because it just introduces more entropy.
@billykruger83925 жыл бұрын
YES.
@hansmuller18465 жыл бұрын
@@replaceitem *algorithm
@bigironenthusiast93435 жыл бұрын
@@hansmuller1846 I think algyrthym sounds better
@EvilNeonETC5 жыл бұрын
It isn't necessarily the lava lamps themselves, but rather the code that makes up the image that the camera sees at any given time. It's an image hash. Clever idea really.
@E3kHatena4 жыл бұрын
Two fun facts: -Tom didn't necessarily need to approach Cloudflare about filming in front of the lava lamps as Cloudflare encourages people to come pass by, take photos/videos, and even put on approved demonstrations or performances in front of the lamps, as that introduces further randomness. -Their London office has a machine that utilizes the RNG data their offices have produced to spit out receipts that contain random numbers, phrases, Magic 8-Ball responses, mazes, sudokus, and QR codes.
@Nick-bb4nk3 жыл бұрын
Are the puzzles actually able to be solved?
@jusp998923 жыл бұрын
Another fun fact: no one cares
@mrrooter6013 жыл бұрын
thats freaking cool tho
@Bigjoebig3 жыл бұрын
Fun fact im homophobic
@ultragamer1353 жыл бұрын
@@jusp99892 I care though.
@antoniomargallo53175 жыл бұрын
So, this is how the KZbin algorithm works?
@m_affiliates4 жыл бұрын
Yes
@geradosolusyon5114 жыл бұрын
No
@zedaddy35304 жыл бұрын
Hopefully
@m3b024 жыл бұрын
Maybe
@qualitycroissant85274 жыл бұрын
Could be
@stevenbridges7 жыл бұрын
Damn this is clever! Who knew that lava lamps are keeping us safe 😂
@kasane13377 жыл бұрын
These lamps can't keep us safe knowing that you could easily just poke them to turn them into Aces.
@buzzlightbeer42157 жыл бұрын
Tech people, of course :)
@jebbush41027 жыл бұрын
Oi steven its nice seeing you here. I am very passionate about citrus fruit
@jenniferstill80416 жыл бұрын
FELLOW MAGICIAN!!!
@TechDark6 жыл бұрын
Cloudflare knew
@ZORU114 жыл бұрын
I wonder what cloudflare does to keep us safe Cloudflare: haha lava lamp go blob blob
@philippbrogli7794 жыл бұрын
Xd
@chocobean_4 жыл бұрын
PewDiePie 🤗
@mohamedmusamustafa33244 жыл бұрын
@Mialisus nobody asked
@kittenmimi53264 жыл бұрын
@Mialisus nice
@Cold_Ham_on_Rye4 жыл бұрын
@Mialisus gottem
@charlottebiscuit41335 жыл бұрын
i really hope theres now some keys with encrypted pictures of tom scott standing next to the lava lamp wall now
@Sassi7997Ай бұрын
There are probably hundreds of keys with the maintenance guy changing a light bulb.
@HussainAHN7 жыл бұрын
God damn it Tom! How do you keep finding all of this interesting crap?
@catsdgs7 жыл бұрын
حسين عبدالله it's not crap
@pix_d207 жыл бұрын
catsdgs it's a good kind of crap
@gulraizfarrukh7 жыл бұрын
Its not crap if its interesting 😂😂😂
@GrantSR7 жыл бұрын
Depends on your field of study, now doesn't it?
@Merthalophor6 жыл бұрын
look a millimeter past your media bubble and you will see that _everything_ has interesting aspects to it
@hmmyesinteresting7 жыл бұрын
I need a lava lamp next to my computer.
@dragoncurveenthusiast7 жыл бұрын
I HAVE a lava lamb next to my computer. Someone wanted to throw it away years ago. I rescued it.
@coolbrotherf1277 жыл бұрын
I had one until it stopped working.
@SamuelBoshier7 жыл бұрын
I have a plasma ball next to mine. Does that count?
@nrellis6667 жыл бұрын
I need a basket of kittens
@chookax7 жыл бұрын
Ok is this the new account that appears everywhere?
@humter4 жыл бұрын
I imagine that somewhere on the internet, there's a key that contains Tom Scott
@karlyrodenburg27764 жыл бұрын
Oh my gosh yes
@JonatasAdoM3 жыл бұрын
The Red shirt encryption key.
@VivienneGucwa7 жыл бұрын
And then the company currently using a basket of kittens slowly, and surreptitiously raises their collective eyebrows...
@michaelr.75286 жыл бұрын
I personally use a erratically swinging lava kitten.
@asj34196 жыл бұрын
...that is radiocative.
@RICDirector5 жыл бұрын
Well, they HAVE to raise them slowly and surreptitiously...ever tried moving anything quickly around a basket of kittens? :P
@ThisLittleCriticSanad7 жыл бұрын
That is brilliant! And super mesmerizing!
@amany85387 жыл бұрын
This Little Critic yes!
@buzzlightbeer42157 жыл бұрын
They did not invent it. books.google.com/books?id=-yCWwricVlYC&pg=PA50. In the 1980s there were many people using fluids and lights and CCD to make random numbers. And some people used noise. (random electricity from Mic feed into a ADC). And quantum random numbers can be made with a smart phone but smart phones can be hacked
@sam236962 жыл бұрын
The one in Singapore that uses a radioactive source really interested me. The pendulum and lava lamp are macroscale versions of the Singapore one in a way, and yet using radioactive decay to generate random numbers uses such fundamental physics. It's like they have directly linked their RNG to the fabric of reality itself. The code the universe was written in is effectively interfaced directly with cloudflare servers.
@abdirahmann8 ай бұрын
cloudflare servers is part of the code of the universe
@RodrigoGraca317 жыл бұрын
"pointed a camera to a basket of kittens" ..... "that would be a high maintenance" Tom.... you know there's KZbin Live streams of baskets of kittens right.....? :P
@Satters6 жыл бұрын
and one of them is run by a guy from a software company !
@odyseya5 жыл бұрын
Link????
@lokifrostpaw2976Ай бұрын
Zelda????
@Paul_Lucas7 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on 1 million subscribers. Very well earned. 👍🏻👍🏻
@iSyriux4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@hybrid29364 жыл бұрын
@@iSyriux you're welcome
@anisht75243 жыл бұрын
@@iSyriux you're welcome
@Scampi953 жыл бұрын
you're welcome
@GintaPPE10003 жыл бұрын
Whoa, fancy seeing you here Paul.
@adamrumer27364 жыл бұрын
You’re one of the least toxic channels I follow. Genuine. Interesting. I love it.
@LiveHedgehog7 жыл бұрын
If you can start predicting those numbers, you can start breaking those locks. Which is why I'm here at the headquarters of Cloudflare, in San Francisco. Erm, phrasing XD
@Jamie-tx7pn7 жыл бұрын
Tom Scott pro hacker
@casperes09127 жыл бұрын
No. You couldn't. You could predict the lava lamp's state, yes... But the exact amount of dust, the placement of the lamps, the amount of dust in the room, whether or not a car drove by, the exact angle of the camera and the quality of the camera (i.e how often does it take a photo, how high is the resolution, what colour space is it mapping it to), all contribute to the number
@CMDrRedstone7 жыл бұрын
leave a camera in there
@bcubed727 жыл бұрын
_"Chris urquhart"_ You clearly don't understand chaos theory. Even if you had the EXACT lava lamp, and put the EXACT same bubble pattern in it, minute differences (your exact voltage heating the lamp, error in exactly approximating the lava lamp, a 0.001C difference in room temperature) would propogate and quickly have your "copy" diverge from what it is modeling. It's a CHAOTIC SYSTEM. What you are proposing is aakin to forecasting the weather, a decade in advance, from today's known data. There's NO POSSIBLE WAY you could know the data precisely enough to do that...you could be pretty damn accurate for a week, then chaos would rear it's ugly head. (You forgot to account for that one butterfly in Madagascar that flapped its wings.)
@buzzlightbeer42157 жыл бұрын
The sad thing is people think they are safe using ssl when they are not. Browsers always have " security.ssl.require_safe_negotiation" off. For mozilla firefox, in the address bar type about:config then enter. Then type ssl into the search box. Then look for security.ssl.require_safe_negotiation . Change it from false to true. *just a warning. websites with bad security won't work anymore* . And Some ads may disappear. Some insecure ssl advertisements were used by foreign governments to hack everyone's internet browsers. I don't know if they still are
@ReportSubject7 жыл бұрын
they should use edgy teens RAWR XD IM SO RANDOM
@scoomplers5 жыл бұрын
This joke is severely underrated
@RyanTosh5 жыл бұрын
1. Pay a bunch of teens minimum wage to sit at a computer 2. Run a chat program and let them talk to each other 3. Add some bots (pretending to be people) to randomly change up the conversation 4. Take the hashes of their conversation 5. Profit
@user-pc5sc7zi9j5 жыл бұрын
@@RyanTosh Why pay them? People chat in their free time.
@RyanTosh5 жыл бұрын
@@user-pc5sc7zi9j That way there's a high demand. You also can't just take it from a public chat room, or other people could access the data you use for your security protocol
@charonder5 жыл бұрын
@@RyanTosh R/whoooooooosh
@swisstroll32 жыл бұрын
When I was writing computer games in the 1970s, I used the memory refresh register as my source of random numbers. Since my games involved a lot of human interaction, there is was adequate variation in activity to ensure that different games had different outcomes. The refresh register cycles through the memory to keep it powered, and has a large number of values each second. A weakness of the register is that numbers are sequential, but using them as a seed to a pseudo random number generator give a range of values.
@williamdrum9899 Жыл бұрын
Z80?
@achu11th7 жыл бұрын
And somewhere in future these lava lamps will be replaced by randomly selected schroedinger cats, because some mathematician accidentally makes it easier to predict lava lamps. So you might be not that far off, Tom.
@Latooni7 жыл бұрын
If the singapore office is recording radioactive material, they're already using the mechanism behind the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment without the needless felicide
@achu11th7 жыл бұрын
Latooni Subota But you know, cats are bigger than splitting atoms. There are so many different cat species out there that a cat popping into existing still very random as you don’t know how big it was and it fur color. An atom is a little more predictable. But I agree, if cats (although internet’s favorite, still manages to be difficult to manage), radioactivity is a close and good second option.
@d2factotum7 жыл бұрын
They should just use videos uploaded to KZbin in order--that ought to be sufficiently random for anyone, I should think! :)
@achu11th7 жыл бұрын
d2factotum except for the fact, that you could hack youtube and filter the types of video you need to create the code for you. Nobody should know, that youtube is the source for the randomness in that case.
@achu11th7 жыл бұрын
· 0xFFF1 yeah you could film the brains of randomly selected schroedinger cats. That sounds indeed better.
@logan26697 жыл бұрын
"What do you do" "I collect randomness"
@brunosco Жыл бұрын
Tom Scott, the genius of viral videos who’s not clickbait.
@pawelabrams7 жыл бұрын
Yay! Someone uses lava lamps as source of randomness again! I've actually covered them briefly in my thesis - and then proceeded to extract randomness from movement of microorganisms :D
@foty86793 жыл бұрын
That sounds cool
@SophiaLi-pv9ec Жыл бұрын
wait sorry i didn't read the replies before i said that
@jchoi54076 жыл бұрын
1:56 top left top line "uwu"
@tienquangbinh4 жыл бұрын
n o
@mngmng_4 жыл бұрын
How serious is your ADHD?
@louisnolan87884 жыл бұрын
UwU
@tabinb.69844 жыл бұрын
Under uwu and a bit to the left is jah uwu
@AntiWeebPenguin4 жыл бұрын
You used "uwu" give me your human rights
@ticlazau70274 жыл бұрын
Step 1: get some lava lamp. Step 2: break into Nasa and the Pentagon.
@brucewayne59164 жыл бұрын
Step3: leak highly classified information Step4: fly to Moscow
@williamwalworth31514 жыл бұрын
Step5: eat pant
@aadipandey82374 жыл бұрын
@@williamwalworth3151 egg plant
@thesuperpunmaster63694 жыл бұрын
Step 6: chug paint thinner
@RKroese4 жыл бұрын
Done. Now what?
@Storystein5 жыл бұрын
This is one of the most hilarious and amazing videos I've seen on this channel. Also the one that sounds the most like an April Fools joke.
@CryTyped7 жыл бұрын
this is a really cool way for random numbers to be generated, much cooler than atmospheric noise!
@peterdvornik7 жыл бұрын
When you're dealing with 10% of internet traffic, the cost of keeping a few dozen lava lamps plugged in is negligible
@lordcatboygaming3 жыл бұрын
I feel like a aquarium would be a perfect job for this fish never swim exactly the same in the same place with the same fish around them in the exact same spot its always totally random even the plants sway as the water currents clash with the side of the glass
3 жыл бұрын
aquarium would work, but more maintenance. have to feed the fish and all
@vibaj162 жыл бұрын
literally just pointing a camera at a blank wall would work just as well. The noise would be enough
@CalaTec2 жыл бұрын
@@vibaj16 if it was that easy they would have done it. The position of the"lava" inside the lamp counts on the number generation. Even with noise, a white wall won't give you enough variety.
@chrismanuel97682 жыл бұрын
@@CalaTec No, a blank wall would absolutely work, especially when it's in an active office reception area with changing light conditions. The lava lamps are a gimmick to draw attention. You can just use static background radiation for randomization.
@kyarumomochi51462 жыл бұрын
@@chrismanuel9768 Now add the static randomness of a wall + laval lamps randomness and you get why they use lava lamps
@colas67693 жыл бұрын
Cloudfare, this is the most insane idea I ve heard so far. Quite imagined randomly also. Who came up with the idea of videotaping lava lamps? That's really smart guys, keep up.
@aceman00000992 жыл бұрын
Nerds in the 90s did ...
@jumbazix42497 жыл бұрын
Thanks , *I feel much more secure now*
@DavidJohnson-mo7fq7 жыл бұрын
Jumbazix hahahahaha
@JohnTaylorMusicClips535 жыл бұрын
I like how you manage to smile consistently in your videos and seem to genuinely enjoy life while I get annoyed when my dad comes in to watch the tv
@henkbarnard15537 жыл бұрын
I like the Kitten idea better.
@MaraK_dialmformara7 жыл бұрын
Yeah, lava lamps are cool, but Tom's channel needs more cats.
@CircsC7 жыл бұрын
Fasten the lava lamps securely and let the kittens observe
@Skjoldmc7 жыл бұрын
Kittens are already running the internet enough.
@TorquemadaTwist7 жыл бұрын
CircsC Fasten lava lamps to kittens them observe.
@amirabudubai22797 жыл бұрын
Then cat videos will literally be the backbone of the internet.
@Seegalgalguntijak7 жыл бұрын
So if someone wanted a huge wall full of lava lamps in their own home, would they be able to point a high definition webcam at it and sell the randomness to other companies which need that for their operation, in order to get back a bit of the power cost for those lamps?
@undead8907 жыл бұрын
I don't think that would be recommended mainly because the photos could be accessed by hackers and used to generate the same random keys. This is probably on a closed network making it very difficult to hack.
@Colopty7 жыл бұрын
Anyone who cares enough about randomness to consider a solution like that are probably too paranoid to outsource it.
@p_serdiuk7 жыл бұрын
The pieces are inexpensive enough that any company that needs such setup probably already has one. Using a lava lamp to generate and re-generate your own passwords and keys is probably smarter.
@ShadowKick327 жыл бұрын
Yes they could, but, here they do it for free, so it's not gonna work.
@klaxoncow7 жыл бұрын
No, because the duplication would compromise the "randomness". Think about it. You're pointing your camera at the lava lamps, running an algorithm to get a random number - e.g. 4589237598236529870 - and then you send out that exact same number to 100 companies. They're all getting the exact same number. So let's say that you're getting this feed of random numbers and so am I. We both get the number 4589237598236529870 sent to us. You use it to create an encryption key. All I have to do is use the exact same algorithms as you and the encryption key I get will be exactly the same. Thus, I can break your encryption. You can't duplicate random numbers and hand out the same numbers to different people, because that makes them perfectly predictable. Whatever number you were given is exactly the same number I was given too. Thus, if you were doing this, then you could only sell your random numbers to a single company. Either that, or you couldn't send out the same number twice. But that has its own problems, in that you have to obtain a random number, send it out, obtain a new random number, send it out, and so forth. You'd be limited in the amount of companies and / or the rate at which you could send out numbers, simply because of the time it takes to "round robin" through all your customers to hand them each a unique random number. (To explain, imagine that it takes 0.1 seconds to take a picture, process it and produce a random number. You have 10,000 customers. So to "round robin" through all your customers, giving them each a unique random number would take 10,000 x 0.1 seconds = 1,000 seconds or 16.667 minutes. So one particular customer only gets 1 random number from you every 17-ish minutes. If they need a lot of random numbers for cryptography, then that rate would just be much too slow for them.) No, if you're serious about your random numbers for cryptographic purposes, you can't source them from the same place as anyone else. You need your own source of randomness. Like, ooh, a big wall of lava lamps, say. Sure, choosing to use lava lamps, that's "theatre" to generate publicity. But the fact that they own their own source of randomness like this to ensure that it's totally unique and can't be duplicated, that's perfectly sound and logical security.
@IAmTheRiverKing3 жыл бұрын
I almost instantly predicted what this was about when I started the video but I was like "that can't be what they are doing, that's way too weird and ingenious to actually work" but it turns out it's done exactly the way I thought it would. The world is a cool place...
@ShawnRavenfire7 жыл бұрын
I remember reading an article back in '96 about that other lava lamp random number generator company. I always thought it was an interesting concept, and I wondered if anything ever became of it.
@paramost7 жыл бұрын
Good excuse to buy some lavalamps.
@rautsaurabh7 жыл бұрын
Paramost d Vdrrtthhbh😎☕️🐱😓👍🏻🌒🌞🌛🌛🌜🌟🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌦🌒🌒🌒🌞🌞🌞🌛🌛🌛🌛🌛🌟🌛🌛🌞🌞⭐️⭐️🌟🌟⭐️⭐️🐛🐛🐺🐥🐵🦁👍🏻😄😎
@rautsaurabh7 жыл бұрын
Hi 👋 my mmkklôp
@Hidden_Seeker_7 жыл бұрын
"Hey Dave, I saw you charged 400 lavalamps to the company credit card." "Oh... Uh Yeah... It's for, uh... Cyber...security." "Brilliant! Dave you've done it again!"
@dnsbrules_01 Жыл бұрын
One thing I thougth about is someone walking in front of the lamps changes it WILDLY. Also if some lamps die out (as lava lamps tend to do) it can be replaced whenever so long as a good majority are working. That also makes it harder to simulate since you don't know when a lava lamp will die.
@AexisRai7 жыл бұрын
RANDOM.ORG uses atmospheric noise, but this is more my aesthetic.
@admkbldwn7 жыл бұрын
qrng.anu.edu.au/ uses the electromagnetic fluctuations created by quantum mechanical virtual particles bubbling in and out of existence in a vacuum. Considerably more SCIENCE!, but not as a e s t h e t i c
@DogsRNice7 жыл бұрын
Adam Baldwin I press numbers on my keypad to get random numbers 111 uhh 1
@facespkz_osu7 жыл бұрын
DogsRNice i got that reference :)
@dorukayhanwastaken7 жыл бұрын
Aexis Rai Did you mean: *_aesthetic_*
@GijsvanDam7 жыл бұрын
I read somewhere that a phone can use the static of the camera to do this, so it works even with the lens covered.
@Osira7 жыл бұрын
Thanks A LOT for all the work you put into sharing fun, strange and interesting information. I'm learning and having a lot of fun at the same time, and this has no price. Thanks again. Cheers!
@HughManatea5 жыл бұрын
Dear god Tom Scott; ten years by and I have learned a lot.
@trejkaz7 жыл бұрын
There was also that machine which rolled real dice around and photographed them to generate random dice rolls, which you'd think would work pretty well for this use case too.
@gemmsquash7 жыл бұрын
This is just one of the reason I love this world we live in. How incredibly great humans can be!
@DeathBringer7694 жыл бұрын
Years ago before this I always heard that using atmospheric weather data was the standard for a good seed/source for random number generation. This is a cool idea for an alternative though ;)
@tsm6883 жыл бұрын
It would be, but these days, wouldn't have enough bitrate.
@madsfuldgas11666 жыл бұрын
PokerStars' headquarter in Australia has a laserbeam constantly shooting at a transparent mirror/glass thing. Sometimes the beam of light shoots through this material and sometimes it gets reflected and does not go through. That system is in their own words "100% random" and will decide how the cards are shuffled in every deck. Randomness is funny!
@YeeLeeHaw Жыл бұрын
Funny how they claim that without an unbiased third party checking its legitimacy.
@NotFab7 жыл бұрын
Being a CloudFlare client myself for a long time now, that is something I really didn't know about.
@Abitibidoug3 жыл бұрын
Wow, that's amazing. I would have never thought of that idea for generating random numbers.
@Joshverd7 жыл бұрын
This is absolutely insane. I now have 1000+ more respect for cloudflare.
@real_Clone_Gordon_Freeman4 жыл бұрын
How to Destroy The Internet: Turn off all the lava lamps and when they cool down and the wax settles at the bottom you can decode EVERYTHING
@mbfinocchiaro424 жыл бұрын
The image noise
@mickys80654 жыл бұрын
@@mbfinocchiaro42 cover the camera
@Dicaso94 жыл бұрын
@@mickys8065 still image noise
@gurin37024 жыл бұрын
@Liam Durr can't make code
@MinePlayersPE4 жыл бұрын
@@gurin3702 replace camera with dummy that returns 0/black
@androuser81044 жыл бұрын
so that's how my 3AM KZbin recommendations comes
@radardjz72754 жыл бұрын
12am
@FrankieSmileShow7 жыл бұрын
If some jerk put black cardboard over the camera, then it would mean the visual component would be the same black screen! Though I imagine Cloudlfare also uses more typical randomness functions in their algorythm and are really using the image just as part of the seed for the randomness (maybe the other part being the unix timecode), so that this kind of malfunction wouldnt straight-up result in the keys becoming the same, they would just temporarily become easier to figure out, and probably not for long enough for someone to breach it. I wonder if they used a low quality camera on purpose that gets a good layer of extra noise in its image or something?
@realcartoongirl5 жыл бұрын
genjus
@Dhalin5 жыл бұрын
putting a piece of cardboard over the camera, would cause the camera to capture a lot of "static noise" ... a bunch of seemingly random dots all through the picture. Not ideal but it would still be at least somewhat random. Using a low-quality camera .... could actually be a decent solution, as it would indeed cause a lot of random colored pixels in the picture.
@wojtekpolska10134 жыл бұрын
@@user-qy4lp8wp5c yea because the imperfection is steady - it stays the same
@NoTraceOfSense4 жыл бұрын
Hash functions. One bit changes everything.
@NoTraceOfSense4 жыл бұрын
Hash functions. One bit changes everything.
@alexanderthompson57134 жыл бұрын
TIL: The security of 10% of the internet is based on a wall of lava lamps.
@DavidLindes4 жыл бұрын
3:28 - I was fortunate enough to have been around for the genesis of that... to think, it all started with a lavalamp set up to play itself in a game of basketball! Back in good ol' Building 15... I've got a lot of fond memories from there. Before long, there 12 lavalamps (4 in each of 3 groups, on staggered 8-hours-on, 4-hours off cycles) in a data center (in another building). Fun times! P.S. How did I not see this video until now? Oh, I guess I wasn't subscribed... fixed! Thanks for refreshing the memories. :)
@jedidr49184 жыл бұрын
“Who I don’t know pointed a camera at a basket of kittens” Me: MILLION DOLLAR IDEA! DIBS
@spindreams7 жыл бұрын
So now all I need to do is hack into the video feed of their lava lamp wall and I have the seed for their encryption hashes.... w00t!!!
@Azettler17 жыл бұрын
SpinDreams exactly my thought
@rakerlad7 жыл бұрын
Then somehow determine the algorithm used to translate physical images into hashes, after determining the data that they transcribe them.
@shadow197 жыл бұрын
Well sort of, they probably have multiple cameras looking at the lava lamps in different directions generating even more encryption hashes seems pretty hard to do anything with just their vid feed, you would also need their exact software to generate the "random keys"
@MrLongpointlessname6 жыл бұрын
If your camera feed was timed wrong (due to network lag, different computer, etc.) by even a a fraction of a second you may not get the same random numbers. A very small variation in speed or very small deviation from their process for generating numbers from that many continuously moving lava lamps generating that long of a number would lead to failure because a 99% correct key would be useless.
@jedigrandmaster64715 жыл бұрын
ya know there are things that you can't just "hack into" right?
@沈啍 Жыл бұрын
I hate how interesting your videos are and how much I love them.
@joshuagranat48774 жыл бұрын
I’m lightly baked and this is blowing my mind. I love lava lamps. I find their service of guarding 10% of the internet is delightful.
@notprovided11312 жыл бұрын
Making security fun as well as secure!
@ceramicbird4563 жыл бұрын
I love the way Tom places a link to an issue from their blog that requires "technical background" to understand while in that very issue there is a link to a simpler one lmao Thank you for assuming we are all smart, that's so nice of you, dear Tom
@sergeychistov81624 жыл бұрын
2:52 left side mouse coursor moving! Btw nice video!
@daniellluch78814 жыл бұрын
0:25 -"Cloudflare is a-" Background noices: UUUUHHHGGGGG...
@iaial04 жыл бұрын
and right after: wewebsites
@loopingdope4 жыл бұрын
gachimuchi
@rrad81063 жыл бұрын
Awesome video!!! Being a retired cybersecurity architect, I can wholly appreciate this!
@OnlyNotes4 жыл бұрын
I would hate to be the poor sap who assembled that shelf. Imagine having to run the nuts on either side of the boards down an entire 8 foot section of all-thread...
@LordWaldema4 жыл бұрын
compressed air and lube could make this an actual fun activity... (that's a sentence I should use more often)
@UDumFck4 жыл бұрын
Yes. I immediately thought of the 1981 Hyatt Regency Collapse, which was effectively caused by contractors not wanting to do that.
@kibe21343 жыл бұрын
@@LordWaldema compressed air and lube can make anything a fun activity.
@MM-jf1me3 жыл бұрын
@@UDumFck Great reference-- applicable and evocative. (I think about that failure quite often and wish I didn't; it always makes me so sad.)
@whisk36754 жыл бұрын
This seems like something straight out of hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy.
@ZanderSwart3 жыл бұрын
This was the best video I have seen on KZbin in over 30 days
@evandermursh84103 жыл бұрын
When a firewall isn't enough, the lava wall comes out
@johnalanwalker4 жыл бұрын
You know this seems to be something thought up by Terry Practhet.
@happycamper43154 жыл бұрын
Anthill Inside? 😉
@Hyrum_Graff4 жыл бұрын
Tom managed to get into Unseen University for the making of this video.
@Zerbey4 жыл бұрын
Leonard of Quirm drew it in the margin of one of his notebooks.
@Verklunkenzwiebel3 жыл бұрын
Foul ole Ron's conscious smell cloud? Not so far off of a lavalamp.. Ratinnabun anyone?
@R.M.MacFru3 жыл бұрын
And they kept B.S. Johnson as far away from it as possible.
@fastst13 жыл бұрын
SGI is alive and well, lavarand was weird at the time in the late 90's but well those folks at SGI would try anything once! I'd imagine most viewers have never heard of SGI, what a great place to work.
@rjuez007 жыл бұрын
I would love to see kittens moving around for 24 hours haha
@keriezy7 жыл бұрын
Rodrigo Juez kittenacademy is the channel you want 😉
@miri28107 жыл бұрын
thanks!
@russelltalker4 жыл бұрын
Plus also, it allows us to say "we generate random numbers from lava lamps" for promo purposes
@thewhites4543 жыл бұрын
Cape Canaveral used to keep an abacus in a glass case, with a notice saying "In emergency break glass"!! So much for high tech!
@TeoTornaci7 жыл бұрын
Didn't Cloudflare just get hacked a few days back? Either way great video.
@Crazymindplow7 жыл бұрын
That was a cache overflow thing over the last six months
@neilisbored21777 жыл бұрын
They got so much money it was a cash overflow
@SatanDotExe7 жыл бұрын
Almost 1 million! :)
@xaph55757 жыл бұрын
Tis now :D
@digitaldigdug78113 жыл бұрын
Beauty given complex functionality. That's pleasing on a number of levels.
@charlesray935 жыл бұрын
Lamp company: so how many lava lamps do you need? Cloudfare: I need about... hmmm... seven thousand two hundred and sixty four.
@burnzy32107 жыл бұрын
i want to see the london office with the crazy pendulum
@hartmutholzgraefe2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for giving good old SGI credit in the end, for a nice trip down memory lane :)
@truthsmiles5 жыл бұрын
So... each lava lamp uses a 40 watt incandescent bulb. There are 100 lava lamps shown. That's 4,000 watts to run them - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. So, roughly, that wall consumes about 2,900 kilowatt-hours per month, which, in San Francisco, adds about $550 to their electric bill. But that's not all... 90% of the energy used by an incandescent bulb is converted to heat. So, in addition to the light, the wall produces about 12,000 BTUs/hr of heat, which, in summer at least, must be removed by the building's air conditioning system. If we assume a very efficient system rated at 12 EER, that's another 1,000 watts continuous power consumption to remove the heat, adding another 25% to their power use. --- Seems using something like a beehive with a window to generate the random images would be far more cost efficient, less wasteful of electricity, and maybe even profitable if they sold 'encryption honey'.
@leomadero5624 жыл бұрын
You could literally put a camera anywhere and break down each frame into code, that would work even better than this if it was in a place with people
@Kaotiqua4 жыл бұрын
I would totally buy encryption honey.
@hgeri0055 жыл бұрын
0:28 Max Headroom attempted to hijack the video for a second there.
@VirtuellJo4 жыл бұрын
Horváth Gergely Found the old guy ;)
@Dave-uniquenamehere3 жыл бұрын
This channel is so random.... I love it!!
@themongoosedog7 жыл бұрын
0:00 "Computers aren't very good" - Tom Scott, 2017
@LegoAndEntertainment4 жыл бұрын
Its true
@gtoger7 жыл бұрын
Is that Erlich Bachman?
@lilyliao95214 жыл бұрын
bruh
@Matt023413 жыл бұрын
Middle Out
@lamichhane3 жыл бұрын
Tom just got those images which were turned into data and then used to encrypt some data, what a clever fellow
@renevillarreall.r.35034 жыл бұрын
1:55 you shouldve let them go nuts trying to figure out where that "key" was for
@pxolqopt35974 жыл бұрын
Jokes on them the key isnt being used anymore
@justmace4 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see that wall lit up in the Darkness
@emjhu34863 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't be in the darkness then.
@ayeshajaved45832 жыл бұрын
I can't make sense of a single bit of this information but it made me happy and amused
@GabrielGABFonseca Жыл бұрын
So _these_ guys are responsible for me not being able to log into Discord today, huh?
@PaulPaulPaulson7 жыл бұрын
Nice to see that Wolfgang Petry got a new job.
@Verspassungsschutz7 жыл бұрын
Paul Paulson love that comment
@Hellboy_1095 жыл бұрын
Never knew it worked like this. Love learning from your videos keep it up!
@Meeminator5 жыл бұрын
_Accidentally knocks some over_ Whoops there goes 2% of the entire internet
@realcartoongirl5 жыл бұрын
but the keys are already generated
@leojenkins715 жыл бұрын
yes it would only affect new sites getting set up
@Kletterhaus5 жыл бұрын
@@leojenkins71 it would affect absolutely nothing
@noneofyourbeeswax34605 жыл бұрын
Give it to Jen
@Krawna5 жыл бұрын
Keep in mind that original post got 283 comments. That's approximately the amount of people who didnt understand the video