Top 10 Best Destroyers In The World | 2022

[@Hunt_GG]

055即使装备有独步世界的射程1500公里的反舰高超音速导弹，那毕竟还是一艘中国的战舰，怎么能让中国战舰排第一呢？我看中国055能排第四也太抬举了，应该排十名开外！

[@PhotoBupaGlobal]

哈哈！那些幾十年前的破爛，永遠第一

[@mingsong1491]

Zumwalt=Type055 ＞Arleigh Burke III ＞Sejong ＞ Atago ＞ Type 052D ＞Kolkata ＞Kongon ＞ 45 Type ＞ Aikizuki

[@rohitb5834]

Vishakapatnam is already in the house. So is Maya Class And they are above Atago if not Sejong. Areligh Burke III enters service in 2023. Block 2 is well inferior to Kolkata. Zumwalt > Type055 > Sejong> Maya >Vishakapatnam >Atago>Type52D>Kolkata > Arleigh Burke II > Horizon

[@morchang624]

Type055 is just a military fish boat, my friend. I know the U.S next-gen DDGX are trying to copy Type 055, but actually, you have to admit that the U.S navy just wants to catch up with the new fish boat trend and upgrade their fishing industry.

[@mingsong1491]

@@morchang624 Military fish boat，well，I love this nickname，It wasn't that long ago that I was worried about the US Empire forcing the fish boat down to the cruiser class, 😏. To Type055, the only problem is powerplant，it's electronics，even better than Zumwalt.

[@mingsong1491]

@@morchang624 The Washington Naval Treaty, 1922, a treaty signed in Washington, D.C., between the five naval powers of the United States, Britain, France, Italy and Japan, on the limitation of naval armament. The main provisions of the treaty were: the ratio of the total tonnage of the main ships of the United States, Britain, Japan, France and Italy was 5.25:5.25:3.15:1.75:1.75. For the foreseeable decade, the U.S. empire will surely do the same thing, pulling China to sit down and do similar negotiations. Because an unrestricted naval arms race would overwhelm the finances of both countries, China would also be happy to see a slowdown in shipbuilding, because after 2025, the cost of building the Chinese 055 would rise from half of the current Arleigh Burke IIA to 80%.

[@Absolut531kmh]

What kind of bias is this? The zumwalt focuses on ground targets more than surface targets.

[@higgsboson9212]

China's 055 probably the most formidable destroyer, it is the only destroyer deploying 10 mach high speed anitship missile with range over 1000 miles.

[@xutongling5077]

of couse

[@puppydude4308]

No no no

[@阿共-y3c]

中国057等离子隐身驱逐舰传出在造了，196个垂发，满载排水量1.8万吨

[@flx2463]

🇰🇷+🇯🇵>🇨🇳

[@刘禹辰-l2x]

@@flx2463日本有俄罗斯邻居，南北朝鲜也是邻居

[@danielluo7710]

The only 055 with dual-band radar is behind a few old warships, hahahaha😂

[@leejack2478]

055 is better than Burke III, even US navy themselves understand it !

[@hermesliteratus882]

True, the US Navy openly admit it. And frankly, I wouldn't take the ranking of this video too seriously.

[@TonyWang62]

055 is the best now.

[@文-x3y]

我们是渔船，你们的是战舰

[@文-x3y]

@Russia🇷🇺 will nukke Porn#o West 是的呢，我们现在除了055，也只有另外三条带飞机的渔船了

[@桑刘-x3x]

​@@文-x3y你是懂战忽局的

[@老二郑]

type 055 is a fishing boat,not warship.

[@老二郑]

@Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov that I agree. enemy.

[@清德賴-v7q]

@Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

[@清德賴-v7q]

@@老二郑 这群老外真好笑

[@mr.grinchee3277]

I agree with your profound analysis. Type 055 is for fishing boat or stealing fish from the sea of other country worldwide. They use a bomb or cannon gun to catch fish illegally.

[@清德賴-v7q]

@@mr.grinchee3277

[@hongyuzhou8935]

055 is the most powerful destroyer as far by now. The most very first outstanding, but not one of them.

[@ALWH1314]

Sejong is a larger version of Burk, same VLS, radar and most weapons, Zumwalt is an experimental failure and it’s more a land attack platform not destroyer with strong ASW. All three use single band 4.3 meter radar and old SM2 or 6 missiles. Older Burk radar is passive, only new block 2A and yet to commission block 3 have active array radar, I don’t know which Sejong has. How can these be better than 055 dual band 5 meter active array radar, larger size VLS and hypersonic missiles? I get you don’t want to be politically incorrect to praise Chinese, I suggest you should just omit both Russian and Chinese in your review instead of technically bias.

[@discordmoderator313]

Type 055 has 112 VLS cells, whilst the Sejong the Great Class has 128 VLS cells, making it the most heavily armed warship bar the Russian Kirov class battlecruisers. At least get your facts right dude.

[@MrRuoxi]

@@discordmoderator313 when you have a beast hand but a near sighted eyes, how could you be stronger

[@johnsilver9338]

Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III have the new AN/SPY-6 radar. Those are definitely better than the Type 346 radar used on Chinese Type 055. Even the older AN/SPY-1D is a bit better. Type 346B radar is comparable to UK's Type 45 SAMPSON and S1850M radar in terms of detection range. While Burke only has 96 VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. Type 055 has separate missiles for that. CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for short range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. There is also SM-6 for both ballistic and air defense, but can also target land and sea at short range. Type 55's HHH-9 is only for air defense.

[@seoul_9584]

This is the reason why china is one the most hated countries in the world. They are so nationalistic and don't know their place. Are you serious? China doesn't even have good technology. They are all copycats or stolen technologies

[@MrRuoxi]

​@@seoul_9584 you should better talk to your politicans, I see no reason they should worry about China if it is as you said. On one side guys like you say China is nothing but just a crap country, on the other side, you say China is the top one threat of U.S. in political, tech and economy. Do you feel the logical problem here?

[@ketefe9562]

Type055 has the most powerful firepower which 112 the biggest missile silos that can hold 448 missiles and the most advanced radar which the only warship in the world has an integrated radio frequency system. The tonnage and stealth performance is second. Type055 overall performance far exceeds Zumwalt and Arleigh Burke Class and junk Sejong the Grea.

[@Big-O43]

HAHAHA Chinese junk that does not work very well, the 055 will crap itself in a real confrontation. Most Chinese made things are first stolen tech from someone else, second poorly reengineered and produced.

[@ketefe9562]

​@@Big-O43 Yes, China always steals what you don't have. All companies sanctioned by the United States against China have advanced technology than the United States. Just like the United States sanctions Huawei’s 5G technology that the United States does not possess.How is it useful? The U.S. still has to pay Huawei 5G patent fees and Huawei's 6G technology is still far ahead.

[@Big-O43]

@@ketefe9562 Keep on dreaming, chinese produce crap, always have, always will. If they cant copy or steal western tech, russia then gives them their junk tech. China cant even keep a disease contained in a lab, infected the entire world, many wonder if that was on purpose !

[@ketefe9562]

@@Big-O43 China is not as backward as you think. Even in time during the simultaneous blockade of the United States and the Soviet Union and its allies, China's technology was not backward and also could build fighter jets and artificial satellites. In addition, to use well-known knowledge does not constitute theft, just as you speak English, it cannot be said that you have stolen just because you are not British.

[@Big-O43]

@@ketefe9562 Right, yet they keep making junk and unleashed a virus on the world that many believe was done on purpose ! I'll give ya that they are the best on spying and stealing from others. What about the sub par steel that they make that when is collapses hurts others, the poison in plastic that was used to make childrens toys the list can go on and on. China cant design anything technologically advanced without stealing the ability or russia giving it to them. They put out more propaganda than N Korea and Russia combined. You want to talk about their human rights issues also, the Nation is a joke !

[@Mr68486848]

"AIKIZUKI" is misspelled. "AKIZUKI" is correct. There is no doubt that I am Japanese.

[@anderskandersson4613]

アキズキ　あきづき　😁 おはようございます コニチワ こんばんは

[@Godzilla-lo2ii]

@@anderskandersson4613 That nice!

[@Mr68486848]

@@anderskandersson4613 sorry. You are right. AKIZUKI is wrong AKIDUKI is correct I'm not good at the alphabet....

[@janusjones6519]

nobody cares

[@devicex14maxx]

don't care

[@孙飞机]

加尔各答不排第一我不服。055小破渔船连个晾衣架都没有就不要上榜了，看看人家伯克和失踪大王先进的雷达波晾衣架多高大威猛。猪母应该跟歼星舰比，毕竟有高贵的需要工匠不断打磨的综合电力系统和天国的电磁炮。

[@冬夜雪域冰莲炎]

典

[@lucisleesion8824]

典中典

[@derhaetair5574]

不知所云，哀

[@fac619]

又在这fuyoo

[@moonryan3908]

得用洋文

[@korea8746]

Korea's King Sejong the Great is 2nd place joy. 🇰🇷 🇰🇷 🇰🇷

[@tugrulzan3136]

Respect and love from TURKEY 🇹🇷🇹🇷

[@鲍先生暹罗之旅]

Your strength comes from the United States

[@tugrulzan3136]

@@鲍先生暹罗之旅 many countries strength Come from US

[@BITCO1N]

@@tugrulzan3136 thank you and It's late, but happy new year🇰🇷🇹🇷🇰🇷🇹🇷

[@thediciple40channel11]

Feel like the Zuumwalt and Arleigh Burke should trade places considering that all the complications that came with the 3 Zuumwalts made the Navy stop its production and resume production of more Arleigh Burkes

[@蓝俊毅-z6s]

Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

[@bieke780]

The Zumwalt class is a failed experiment, not combat-effective at all .The Arleigh Burke class is 40 years old and its performance is outdated！King Sejong class cannot be invisible in front of radar，So the strongest battleship is the 055 type！

[@j.m.youngquist419]

I thought they only had two of the zumwalt class

[@definitelyfrank9341]

Zumwalt lacks a long range volume search radar.

[@skyllline24]

China's type 055 is the best ocean fishing vessel.

[@埃斯顿]

Yes, as a Chinese, I agree with you. and I think India is the most powerful countries in Asia.

[@user-zhoujin]

@@埃斯顿 扯淡，大韩民国是最强大的国家

[@看见我请让我去学习]

@@埃斯顿 三哥亚州第一，韩过宇宙第一

[@cliffrunner]

I feel rankings like this are usually misleading in assumption that those destroyers are having a 1-1 battle. In fact, those destroyers are unlikely to act by themselves in a real battle.

[@zeezee968]

The Zumwalt may be the most technologically advance ship in the list but it definitely not the most powerful.

[@timothychung4811]

It has been a disaster for them so far.

[@fatdoi003]

1/2 of its radar is missing.... they're just blank panels lol

[@mysygisun3335]

使い方ではありませんか、ただズムワルトは駆逐艦とするより、 使い方＝強襲揚陸艦支援艦の立場から、フリゲイト・軽巡洋艦としたほうが正しいのでは。

[@dayanwarna5270]

and the guns...

[@spencer7404]

No, it's not.

[@anderskandersson4613]

Maya Class is the latest and baddest of Japanese Navy JMSDF, currently 2 is in service.

[@蓝俊毅-z6s]

Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

[@dipayansaha4101]

@@蓝俊毅-z6s what about new vishakhapattnam class destroyers ? Ins Visakhapatnam was commissioned in 2021 and ins murmugao will be commissioned in December 2022

[@joshuaraewa-ay9684]

@@dipayansaha4101 .....If I'm a buyer, I'll choose Renhai (Type 055) because all biases aside, it's the most gorgeous ship I've ever seen. No one can deny me that. And it's also a cruiser sized with large modules ready to be improved. Vishakapatnam is also an interesting choice for me, but I want a bigger Vishakapatnam, a cruiser sized before I can decide. But if you ask me between 052D and Vishakapatnam, I'll choose the latter. Anyway, biases aside, I would love to see more newer ships from Asia. Hope ASEAN can make its own version of destroyers.

[@dipayansaha4101]

@@joshuaraewa-ay9684 ins murmagao is coming

[@清德賴-v7q]

Our 055 is used in fisheries. . There should be no place for him on this list.

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@ironspirit3823]

If you don't put type 055 as No.1, meaning you either have zero common sense of how mordern naval warfare goes, or you are just a totally not objective military channel

[@gregbarry5875]

I am not sure the Zumwalt should even be on the list, and certainly not at #1. It was a total failure that was over budget by 200% and failed to meet its capabilities.

[@louiez7179]

@Anuj PanditaBy 'more powerful' ,did u mean those two expensive and useless 155mm cannon?

[@yili3339]

agree.

[@Star832]

Well said Greg

[@hb1338]

@Anuj Pandita In war it is not useful because it can't do anything worthwhile.

[@fatdoi003]

@@louiez7179 don't know why they don't convert them to shoot Excalibur rounds instead

[@xroadcedarhill9224]

South Korean 3 of KD-3 batch 2 is comming, it's even bigger and stronger than 3 of preceding ships. Its displacement is more than 12,000 tons, it will arm SM2ER, L-SAM, 1500 to 3000Km LACM, Super & hyper sonic ASM, Red shark and probably short or medium range ballistic missile. It's gonna be launched in 2024.

[@xroadcedarhill9224]

@silva neymar Nope, HHI started a construction of the first ship from last October 5th. ROKN rescheduled its construction to have the KD3 ships early and 6 of KDDX ships are postponed few years due to the plan

[@현숙이테레비]

@@xroadcedarhill9224 Any way, Korea is strong

[@鲍先生暹罗之旅]

Your strength comes from the United States

[@seoul_9584]

@@鲍先生暹罗之旅 Lol its not

[@musician5378]

I'm Korean. From 2023 is correct.

[@addedcheese]

I'm sure the US navy will eventually make something of the Zumwalt but as of now I highly doubt it is the most powerful destroyer afloat given the huge amount of problems with the ships

[@你不认识我-f3x]

The largest problem being technological immaturity, they fitted to much untested new technologies into it causing price overflow, unexpected systematic issues etc

[@addedcheese]

@@你不认识我-f3x somehow that sounds like a lot of military projects around the world. Great in theory but execution causes problems

[@paulchung9921]

All in all, the firepower of the Zumwalt places it as a top tier, but its survival ability is dismal and nothing like WWII destroyers.

[@addedcheese]

@@paulchung9921 just what... The zumwalts primary weapon is unusable. As it stands it it just a glorified missile boat with really good stealth. What is that comment about WW2 ships?? Modern warfare is completely different so ofc the tools employed are completely different. A modern ship doesn't need to be able to take a hit as in general not getting hit in the first place is far more effective

[@johnsilver9338]

Zumwalt is more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

[@蓝俊毅-z6s]

Talking about the comprehensive combat effectiveness is that China's 055 destroyer is the most powerful! No matter radar or stealth system, as well as the complete set of weapons! The Arleigh Burke class destroyers are all products of 40 years ago! 055 is a product after 2015. Your ranking itself is fair!! Obviously, there are double standards in the United States from the country to the people!! Where can there be notarization?? It's like taking a bag of washing powder to hit a country!

[@Galaxy-ig8si]

I wonder where China stole the technology from.

[@sunnysingha7254]

Everything in china is copy paste 🤣

[@ericshi767]

@@sunnysingha7254 or is it? Then many country can copy one for their own. Don’t be a joke here dude

[@ericshi767]

So many no brained on KZbin LMFAO

[@thunderclapps3261]

@@ericshi767 you know something call blueprint patent,Oh sorry my bad u are from china😂😂

[@wongkcmichael5]

It is a laughingstock. A 1991 US built destroyer is better than a China one made in 2019????

[@PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant]

Chynes 😂 Today a Chynes made J-10 Crashed 😂

[@刘伟真]

@@PoorPakistanisSurrenderwasFant A Indian M2000 crashed . Loser make fake news 😂

[@yuxuanliu6973]

@@刘伟真 兄弟。确实有一架歼十双座坠毁了。不过和三哥比坠毁。太没追求了吧

[@TSUTENKAKU007]

I could be wrong, but perhaps what he is thinking and comparing is based on the overall quality of internal features. As we all know by now that China rather prefers to manufacture inferior or should I say, poor quality products, anything from chop sticks to more sophisticated products. They may look very impressive from the outside, but what counts the most is how well the inside is made, reliability factor as well and overall quality of what U.S. has been making in many past years with quality in mind. Just imagine many of Chinese fighters are reverse engineered Russian products with poor performing engines. So this is what I think what this presentation is talking about, based on overall quality despite U.S. destroyers were originally designed around 1991. Also don't forget all of U.S. destroyers have went through many upgrades with much improved weapon systems to the highest standards of today's navy, so these destroyers will not be fighting with 1991 antiquated equipments. The presentation should have mentioned this factors.

[@taiwanno1wan126]

zumwalt is not really a destroyer at all this is a silly list. The US had to use the burke for the zumwalt role because the zumwalt can never shoot down ballistic missles. It is more of a cruiser or battle ship but now is just a test bed for laser weapons and rail guns etc. Why this list does not include the hobart class is beyond me, it has far better tech then half the destroyers listed. you have a 90s japanese destroyer above it and even the burke is an 80s design

[@tigerpjm]

Mainly because most people don't know Australia exists, so how are they going to know about anything to do with the Australian Defence Force?

[@jacksonteller1337]

Not rail gun they are fitting them with hypersonic missiles in place of the main land attack guns. Lasers are already on it and after 2025 they will be used for stealth attacks on land and sea targets. But you can compare them with old battle cruisers or pocket battleships. They are too expensive and too heavily armed for a destroyer. They could serve as the basis of the new cruiser type when they decided they need a cruiser. Now they are building the new destroyer type as a replacement for the Ticonderoga class first and later on to replace the older models of the Arleigh Burke class. But as near peer warfare becomes a possibility again they will probably dust these off as a stand alone platform.

[@jasondong9721]

@@tigerpjm what is Australia? A country? A prison?

[@tigerpjm]

@@jasondong9721 What is Jason Dong? A person? A penis?

[@rayjames6096]

The Zumwalt is a destroyer that specializes in land attack and operates alone.

[@thomaszhang3101]

I have no idea how Renhai 055 didn’t rank higher than King Seijong or at least Arleigh Burke. In terms of size, displacement, sensors, communications, and VLS, the 055 is clearly better. Sensor - first and only dual band radar, communication - designed and equipped as fleet command ship, VLS - largest diameter out of any VLS and the only VLS using concentric ring vents instead of the older rectangular vents on every other destroyers.

[@canda8350]

055 class is not Aegis combat system.

[@旅人途见]

@@canda8350 한국 스틱

[@russelfang7434]

@@canda8350 King Sejong can kill a star destroyer in a single shot.

[@看见我请让我去学习]

@@babycyndi3235 是的，055是一艘渔船，过段时间就把鱼送到你家😂

[@johnsilver9338]

Burke Flight IIA and Burke Flight III have the new AN/SPY-6 radar. Those are definitely better than the Type 346 radar used on Chinese Type 055. Even the older AN/SPY-1D is a bit better. Type 346B radar is comparable to UK's Type 45 SAMPSON and S1850M radar in terms of detection range. While Burke only has 96 VLS cells, the missiles that they carry are dual/triple purpose. Take for example Tomahawk can target both land and sea targets at long range. Type 055 has separate missiles for that. CJ-10 for long range land attack, YJ-18 for short range anti-ship, and YJ-21 for long range anti-ship. There is also SM-6 for both ballistic and air defense, but can also target land and sea at short range. Type 55's HHH-9 is only for air defense. Also stealth is useless for ships. Even the Zumwalt's RCS can only go as a small fishing boat. Plus even if ships are as stealthy like 5th gen planes, it's useless anyway as Tomahawks is also an anti-radiation missile and can track enemy ships' radar emissions.

[@johnjo7889]

The 055 destroyer launches ballistic missiles and can launch 90 anti-aircraft missiles with a range of 200 kilometers. The ability to detect targets is similar to that of the Burke 3 destroyer. It is called a cruiser by the United States. Your ranking is very imprecise, please allow me to laugh😆😆😆

[@看见我请让我去学习]

不许笑，韩国才是弟一👍

[@johnjo7889]

@@看见我请让我去学习 确实嗷，毕竟宇宙国确实屌，拼凑的装备都能搞好电磁兼容

[@刘鹏-w9h]

@@johnjo7889 我他妈惊了

[@左谷公]

不准笑.gif

[@pis4578]

자랑스러운 우리대한민국 🇰🇷 세종대왕함

[@猫名-v9l]

The problem is people who can't master it.

[@Teemo-_-]

@@猫名-v9l Have you lost your thinking function due to exposure to Fukushima radiation?

[@サイダー001]

There is a culture of putting a toilet in the kitchen in this country

[@theshoutingt573]

소한민국 사람 미친 사람 같다. 도량이 작아서, 비겁해서, 무엇도 작아서

[@洪宇吴]

失踪大王

[@ba-ub7fb]

谦虚了，世宗大王级应该宇宙第一才对😋

[@yuejiang4601]

哈哈哈哈哈

[@brck888]

儿子排爹前面那是僭越啊，就跟日本不敢提谁炸他一样

[@huichang2425]

排第二，现在有正祖大王了，可能将来出现先祖大王就得排第三了。

[@AK19782]

哥们，是失踪大王级😅😅😅

[@josephjun4688]

1、Zumwalt class 2、TYPE 055 CLASS 3、ARLEIGH BURKE 3 4、SEJONG THE GREAT 5、Maya Class 6、ARLEIGH BURKE 2A 7、TYPE 052D CLASS 8、Vishakapatnam Class 9、KOLKATA CLASS 10、ATAGO CLASS

[@贩卖小猪哼唧哼唧]

随他们去吧，一天到晚瞎几把排榜

[@huangshulang.ai.bainian]

@@贩卖小猪哼唧哼唧 嗯嗯 瞎排名

[@Big-O43]

The Burke Mk III would blow the 055 away easily

[@理性-p2s]

@@Big-O43 别逗了。自己相信就好，别说出来！别人会笑你无知的。

[@donchen4906]

@Hot coke Sjong is actually a obsolete destroyer in terms of electronic devices and anti-ships combat capability. Despite it has more VLS than 055 or maya, it doesn't mean Sjong is better, otherwise Ticonderoga-class would be the best isn't it

[@rohitb5834]

This channel just keeps uploading the same videos with a change in Year. A real 2022 list would be (considering the latest additions of 2021 and expected additions of 2022) - 1. Zumawalt 2. Type055 3.Maya Class 4. Vishakapatnam Class 5. Sejong the Great 6. Kolkata Class 7. Arleigh Burke Class 8. Atago Class 9.Type052D 10. Horizon Class (Hobart class can be added if its counted as a Destroyer and not Frigate)

[@donchen4906]

Don't agree. Just because Sjong the great has more VLS doesn't mean it is better. The electronic devices of Sjong is considered to be equal as burke2 or kongo class

[@robertoramirez2146]

Zumwalt solo hay 1 Por lo cuál ni debería estar en el top Ya fue cancelado Aunque sea furtivo No es perfecto. Nisiquiera tiene los cañones de riel de 155mm Ni armás láser. Porque fue demacrada costoso pará la armada de EEUU.

[@rohitb5834]

@@donchen4906 how do you measure electronics? That ranking is based off Radar, and 3 dimensional offensive capabilities - Air, Land/Ship and Sub.

[@donchen4906]

@@rohitb5834 Actually, u can compare them. first, the system of sjong Only allow it to launch sm2 not sm6 second, radar of sjong is A/syp-1 while maya or atago has upgraded it to a/spy-1d which is an upgraded version designed for small and stealthy objects, not mention sjong doesn't has sea searching radar Which means Only a/spy-1 can seach the sea while it has limited range when it comes to low altitude target. Third, both sjong and atago use aegis baseline 7 while maya uses baseline9 which theoretically allow it to launch sm3 and sm6. The Only strength about sjong is the umber of its VLS. But again, it can luanch tomahawk missile which means it really doesn't have land attack ability although neither maya or atago can't use tomahawk as well because Japan ia a defeated country of ww2. You can't Only use Vls to judge whobis better because in that case, ticonderoga is the best Isn't it? sjong is an old ship,built decades ago. Although it is bigger in displacement, the overall system is just obsolete.

[@rohitb5834]

@@donchen4906 1. Atago cant launch SM6 either. It can launch SM3, but yes thats better than Sejong's SM2 2. Both have A/Spy1D(V) radars. Exactly same. 3. Maya is superior i agree. But Atago is superior to Sejong or Kolkata Class? Hell no. 4. Sejong also has hanger for 2 Helicopters. Atago has 1 .

[@aryaputram]

Vishakhapatnam and kolkata Class🔥🔥🇮🇳🇮🇳

[@shaddinmalik6364]

Lol

[@aryaputram]

@@shaddinmalik6364 what lol Pakistani 🤣

[@aryaputram]

@@shaddinmalik6364 just beg china for everything even for making baby 🤣🤣😂 We are independent to make our necessities 🔥🇮🇳 जय हिंद

[@shaddinmalik6364]

@@aryaputram I'm not pakistani I'm russian

[@aryaputram]

@@shaddinmalik6364 🤣🤣shut up liar 🤣

[@karthikvj1106]

Zumwalt is not a class of destroyer class it is a TABPUS (Technologically Advanced But Practically Useless) class ship.

[@chrisdean6700]

That's what the US military wants everyone to believe. I suspect the Zumwalt is at the cutting edge of laser tech and a very dangerous warship.

[@ethanfriedrich]

Technically Zumwalt is a gunboat not a destroyer. It’s not built for naval warfare but for land attack. This guy doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

[@karthikvj1106]

@@chrisdean6700 You maybe right but we don't know I just said it based on what is out about it.

[@karthikvj1106]

@@ethanfriedrich If it was so advanced then why did Navy cut it's number from 32 to 3.US is not a country that backs out from a project for it being costly.... sorry if my comments offended you

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@thorsb606]

What a joke. The Zumwalt is a massive failure & production of this this type has been scrapped. But it's No 1? Lmao

[@NIGHTSHADE1997]

In 2016, the Navy canceled the AGS's Long Range Land-Attack Projectile because the reduced Zumwalt plan pushed the cost per round up to more than $800,000. And in 2018, the Navy said that even with the high cost of the round, the system was also failing to achieve the range the Navy was seeking

[@NIGHTSHADE1997]

That’s why they were cancelled

[@karimbenzamin2996]

america: we have the most powerful navy russia: hold my vodka

[@menlay2k]

Russia doesn't have navy wtf, 0 air craft carriers.

[@4m33rsgame4]

Wow nice editing on cn type 055 adding double gun 3 seahawk heli

[@TheGreatMarathaArmy]

Actually there's also a third gun on the top😂😂😂

[@gamertocagirl3299]

Yeah not a clickbair

[@agabuctolan7347]

bias. why don't you reveal the destroyer of Russia the best destroyers ever

[@mac2626]

Well if the Moskva is anything to go by then it’s not bias it’s just that Russia can’t build warships comrade.

[@amos325]

Nice selection, I had a good laugh today

[@大王-p6n]

055 is the best, more powerful

[@대한민국만세-s6e]

더욱 진보된 세종대왕급 3척 추가건조와 추가로 자체기술로 통합마스트적용한 6척을 추가건조 합니다 그리고... 호위함이라말하지만 톤수가 커진 5000톤급6척 4000톤급 다수가 생산 되고 있습니다. 잠수함은 비밀... 대한민국 해군입니다.

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@BuChuanNeiKu]

🤏

[@军事-s1f]

比起日本，韩国是超级大国😌

[@qwqw55556666]

@@军事-s1f 美國大兵可以說下日韓兩國 哪國服務好啊

[@rietachikawa7947]

失踪大王是吧？韩国小小国家👌，喜欢叫大韩，一个垃圾船，叫大王级。😂

[@lenthokchom]

Lol the type 055 destroyer deserve the top spot. The only destroyer with a hypersonic missile in service.

[@-philippe7647]

没有台湾的0.06万吨巨舰塔江舰？差评！熊三在手，天下我有！

[@shawnhe6180]

哥们，你别逗我了，这船进水了

[@tarkshans]

专门打渔船的那个船 那个导弹吗？

[@Seenit_73]

Playing World of warships does not make you a Naval Engineer...

[@RICK-cr8pr]

萬噸大驅055只能排第四? 我不知道作者在想什麼。 在我看來它沒有第一也有第二,055的第二批次055A還很有可能加入激光武器,全電推進系統和電磁砲,潛力無窮。 而朱艦很大意義上算是先進概念的試驗艦,只生產三隻就停止了,功能面偏向匿蹤對岸打擊,全面性不足,高度自動化讓他精簡人員不到100人,一遇到戰損,兵員太少反而成為致命傷,無力快速維修止血,只適合在友軍占據很大海空優勢下才能出擊。 很多排名要考量實戰戰績,功能性和服役數量。

[@泽野-v8c]

大王乌贼舰在第二，就知道作者是什么成分了哈哈哈哈

[@willhu3601]

Can the hybrid boat in India rank fifth? All of India’s weapons depend on foreign support. When the war begins, they will all become shit.

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@THE_VARUN_EDITZEE]

Why Chinese People are Always Living in Balck 😂😂 Foreigners Suport 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Came in War Then Understand 😁

[@simplespecial3313]

Kolkata class is indian made .....i feel Agni 5 will land in Beijing if you think this ! ....

[@willhu3601]

@@simplespecial3313 The power system of the Kolkata-class destroyer comes from Ukraine, the radar comes from Israel, the anti-ship missile comes from Russia, the anti-aircraft missile and close-to-air gun come from Israel and Russia, the ship management system comes from Canada, the naval gun comes from Italy, and the helicopter comes from Russia , you just put them together, don't kid yourself ok？By the way, Agni 5 is also a piece of shit compared to DF 41

[@simplespecial3313]

Okay something more ?????

[@leiabbiepercia4666]

I thought the Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers are top 3 and Type 055 is top 2.

[@dpzzkr7880]

颜值排名：1、Zumwalt 2、type055 其他的都是上个时代的

[@o_O杰克奥特洋O_o]

加尔各答和055排名挨着，笑到了

[@dddddh1]

zhumuwoerte有点太科幻了，但并不好看

[@vettellewis7768]

综合实力最强的明显是055，不清楚作者以什么排名排的，朱姆沃特更像是一艘先进技术集合试验舰并没有形成有效战力

[@chloey3492]

@@vettellewis7768 人家也知道055很牛逼但是就是不敢排到前面

[@李毅-q1z]

那个已经提前退休了，有什么资格和055比

[@danielqi7716]

055 is just a small fishing boat and cannot enter the Top 10😎

[@부린이-r7h]

형님들 정조대왕함으로 세대교체 되었습니다 ...

[@notsohandytim5090]

A far cry from the leftover WWII Tin Can I resided on back in the '60s when we were still trying to figure what a drone was.

[@gekikara_48]

KIROV-CLASS BATTLECRUISER with Hyper Sonic Zircon? Did you forget it?

[@grzegorzstyrna26]

Is it destroyer or battlecruiser?

[@gekikara_48]

in the description, can be as a destroyer

[@ser43_OLDC]

That is a battlecruiser, but yes the Goroskov class is name frigate but is clearly a destroyer

[@oldcynical2845]

Nice missiles but is a poor asw & air defense platform.

[@ser43_OLDC]

@@oldcynical2845 Excuse me what? Poor air defense? I didn't know that having a400 was a poor Ground to Air defense

[@casperlinlin3519]

When I saw Korea warship ranged as no.2, I know it’s video for entertainment 😂

[@ridoyukil17]

American destroyer no.1. So funny

[@shawnhe6180]

导弹都发射不了居然排导弹驱逐舰的第一位，funny writer

[@tigerpjm]

Zumwalt Class. You don't know what you're talking about...

[@alpearson9158]

actually the Brit is correct

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@bieke780]

The Zumwalt class is a failed experiment, not combat-effective at all .The Arleigh Burke class is 40 years old and its performance is outdated！King Sejong class cannot be invisible in front of radar，So the strongest battleship is the 055 type！🤣

[@chrisng7015]

不对啊，世宗大王级和055都不应该放在这个排行榜里面啊，世宗大王级是宇宙战舰，而055是带有鹰击21型高超音速撒网装置的远洋渔船啊😏

[@wonseberg]

055 rubbish！

[@chrisng7015]

@@wonseberg yeah yeah yeah,you are absolutely goddamn right

[@seoul_9584]

@@chrisng7015 exactly.

[@seoul_9584]

Chinese have inferiority complex to South Korea.

[@大菠蘿-d4m]

@@wonseberg 哈哈，你说得对~~

[@felix25ize]

How can you compare the Zumwalt who is in fact a cruiser with her 16000 tons and 155 mm cannon, vs 7000 tons destroyers with much more little armament ?

[@АндрейМ-ф5н]

Лутьший исминец это тип 055 , зумвалд отдыхает.

[@michaeldobson107]

Because she is classified as a Zumwalt-class destroyer, not a Zumwalt-class cruiser, regardless of what you think? In naval terminology, a destroyer is a fast, maneuverable, long-endurance warship intended to escort larger vessels in a fleet, convoy or battle group and defend them against powerful short range attackers. There is nothing said anywhere about displacement or armament.

[@fatdoi003]

Japan classified its light carrier as helicopter destroyer flying F35B lol

[@easonovo]

​@@fatdoi003lol笑死了

[@ThatsMrPencilneck2U]

Ships "weigh" anchors; they "displace" tons.

[@ThatsMrPencilneck2U]

@Dord Dord Archimedes was a land lubber.

[@오빠각시]

세종대왕 ㅎㄷㄷ 깜놀했네요

[@청바지-g9t]

일본의 최신은 마야급이죠 세종대왕 함은 실제는 아타고 에게도 많이 밀립니다 성능 대충 적으려니 글이 너무 길거 같아 패스 진짜 군사 무기에 투자 좀 더 했으면 좋겠네요

[@reconnaissance12xx]

세종대왕함이 넘버2야? ㅇ0ㅇ

[@bigeyetop10]

What is the music in video? Title?

[@muchunchen1117]

离谱的排名，055和阿利伯克怎么可能排在世宗大王的后面。而且052dl居然没有上榜。052dl至少强于45型这个四面有源相控阵都没有的东西。客观的排名应该是：朱姆沃尔特>055>阿利伯克>爱宕级。你在排名的时候如果客观的参考了雷达水平，垂直发射系统等重要参数，你就不会得到如此搞笑的排名。不如说你根本不了解军事。

[@看见我请让我去学习]

他是战忽局的😂

[@zhenghangliu3886]

人家也有大内宣的嘛

[@王轩-e3s]

让他们排，我们默默发展就好

[@勒波特]

我看着就笑一笑，朱姆沃特，这个移动的故障品。

[@muchunchen1117]

@@勒波特 讲道理朱姆沃尔特这个畸形的定位都不该进入这个榜单，只是说按照一贯的保守说法如此排，免得太多精美过来杠

[@fatdoi003]

Zumwalt can't even make it on the list..... it has no aegis radar and the gun magazines are empty....also type 052D is better than most on the bottom list.... and 055 should be above Burke

[@吾心念君颜]

055是渔船不是军舰

[@看见我请让我去学习]

要鱼吗？全球包邮😂

[@jasondong9721]

Shouldn’t the Zumwalt be last why? Why? No ammo it’s only used for sight seeing

[@kazzi5874]

@Anuj Pandita🤣

[@michaeldobson107]

Definitely take a shot at it then. lol.

[@shawnhe6180]

早就成为弃儿的朱姆沃尔特排第一，世宗大王何德何能能排在055和阿利伯克前面？好吧。后面那些垃圾战舰比如顶个球的45都在內，居然没有世界上拥有数量前二的052D，好吧，不愧为充满了意识形态的排名

[@michaeldobson107]

@@shawnhe6180 Thanks, Shawn. Wish I could understand what any of those characters mean.

[@johnsilver9338]

Zumwalt should not be in the list anyway as it's more like a submarine than a destroyer. Stealthy like a submarine, and carries long range missile like a submarine. Anyway, it's being repurposed and its gun will be replaced by the Navy's new CPS (Conventional Prompt Strike) hypersonic missile, which is their version of Army's LRHW (Long Range Hypersonic Weapon) that is operational since October last year.

[@Naz_i206]

Maya class destroyer(an improved Atago) should be in the list

[@lightfootpathfinder8218]

There are 6 type 45 destroyers in the Royal navy not 4

[@Wargamer_Asian]

In top 10, list destroyer at this ERA! The CN TYPE 055 Destroyer is most powerful and very dangerous opponents, this channel is pro western countries, zumwalt class destroyer is a weak warships and failed project of US NAVY the US Congress is already canceled Zumwalt class destroyer project, original contract 32, ships and Build 3 ships zumwalt. The Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer and Ticonderoga Class Cruiser is outdated and subject for retirement but remained in duty because the zumwalt class destroyer is the replacement of that ships outdated. And the other hand the CN TYPE 055 Destroyer is very advanced technology the radar Chinese destroyer is capable to detect stealthy technology aircraft or warships even spy satellite do not under estimate Chinese technologies because in this Modern ERA the Chinese Technologies is totally Surpass western countries technologies specially to the USA 🇺🇸

[@josephjun4688]

1、Kirov class battlecruiser 2、Zumwalt class 3、TYPE 055 CLASS 4、ARLEIGH BURKE 3 5、Ticonderoga class cruiser 6、SEJONG THE GREAT 7、Maya Class 8、Slava Class Cruiser 9、TYPE 052D CLASS 10、Vishakapatnam Class

[@sunx4432]

Are you kidding me ?

[@Youraveragegamer_97]

Slava should be on the bottom of the list

[@josephjun4688]

@@Youraveragegamer_97 Okay，The first Slava class cruiser Sunk on 13 April 2022

[@frankk1pro484]

How can a 30 year old destroyer be better than a 4 year old. Total nonsense.

[@user-po4ku8fo7k]

제가20년전 해군에 복무했을때 해군구호중 하나가 "오늘은필승해군 내일은대양해군"이었다 그만큼 연안해군에서 대양으로 나아가자는 신녕이었다 하지만20년이지난 해군은 괄목상대하여 대양해군이되어 감동스럽고자랑스럽습니다

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@stchane6412]

Korea navy have more destroyers than UK

[@sunx4432]

The fact that the Korean president did not meet with Pelosi shows that Korea is indeed an independent and intelligent country，love from China

[@Angelina-ie4wf]

有什么区别吗？

[@MikeAtsubo]

楼上几位缝纫机都踩完了，可以回去领盒饭了吗？😂

[@josephjun4688]

Top 10 Destroyers ＆ Cruiser in the world 2023 1、Kirov Class BattleCruiser 2、TYPE 055 CLASS( The YJ-21 is a Chinese hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile ) 3、Zumwalt Class 4、ARLEIGH BURKE 3 5、Ticonderoga Class Cruiser 6、SEJONG THE GREAT 7、Maya Class 8、ARLEIGH BURKE 2A 9、TYPE 052D CLASS ( YJ-21 ) 10、Slava Class Cruiser or Vishakapatnam Class or ATAGO CLASS

[@rafalef42]

Where is japanese Maya class??..it is superior to Atagos

[@ALWH1314]

Zumwalt should not be listed, it’s an expensive toy that doesn’t do what destroyer does. It’s doesn’t have active array radar, it doesn’t has ASW, it’s a huge ship with less VLS than the rest of the ships listed. The only thing it has is stealth so it can get close to enemy without being detected, but who is the targeted enemy? If the enemy is ships, then it’s needs powerful radar to detect them and powerful anti ship missiles which it doesn’t have. If the mission is air defense then stealth is meaningless. It doesn’t have tow sonar to chase submarine and stealth is useless in ASW. The only stealth usage is approach land without being detected and launch attack, then again if the enemy is like china with a bunch of satellites, every single US war ship is tracked no matter stealth or not.

[@constance813]

055連阿利伯克都不如我不是很讚同，還有，世宗號這麼強，韓國一定是個超級大國而且有獨立自主的軍事指揮權吧😅

[@李逸曦]

世宗大王确实我没想到。。。

[@innnnvincible]

这排名也就图一乐

[@秋雨-x9x]

我看到把朱母放第一我是没绷住，既然朱母那么强怎么只造了三艘。。。。

[@horrimaid762]

军盲频道

[@qwqw55556666]

傻子樂頻道 積極培養岡比亞神人幾天占領蘇聯那種老六

[@michaeldobson107]

Zuumwalt: "...there are only 3 of them made." Yep. And that's gonna be it, too. lol.

[@rayjames6096]

None of the other destroyers on the list were produced in more than four except for the Arleigh Burke class and they're all far less advanced as the Zumwalt.

[@shaunphillips1970]

4????? Type 45 Built was 6...D 32 Daring / D 33 Dauntless/D 34 Diamond / D 35 Dragon / D 36 Defender / D 37 Duncan

[@miguelmig1771]

.0 type 055 Chinese is number one, not those US junkyards

[@骑士骑士]

As a Chinese, I think China's 055 ranking is too high and should not be ranked in the top ten. I think the stereotype of Western audiences is accurate. It is a copied product, but the country to which it is copied has not been found. Until the 055 of the United States comes out, the 055 of the United States will rank first. Chinese people can only enter the ranking by copying the Chinese version of the 055 of the United States by time machine, barely ranking tenth。The science fiction ship of the United States has stopped construction. It is a failed product and is not included in the ranking. The first place should be South Korea, a cosmic power, the second place is Japan, the third place is the weak United States, and the fourth place is India, a superpower.

[@yuanchenli1901]

warships that can travel only 65 km per hour are only sitting ducks for today's advanced missiles whose speed is over 60 km per minute

[@조자룡-y9m]

대한민국 세종대왕함 2위 대한민국 화이팅 입니다.

[@傅骏宬]

现实版美国殖民地

[@kkk-tf3my]

@@傅骏宬 지구의 민폐의 중공

[@chinadidchina9117]

@@傅骏宬 Slaves of xi jinping. Just go and working for your master 💪

[@chinadidchina9117]

@@傅骏宬 kzbin.info/www/bejne/f6Ssg2WVi9Vnr7s

[@chinadidchina9117]

@@傅骏宬 kzbin.info/www/bejne/g5LbcoqVj75ra9k

[@steinfrick677]

Chinese ships are built 4 fishing, plz remove them from the list.❤

[@unudo3359]

The current order for class 055 is eight, and it is likely that additional orders will be placed. At present, the construction of the jumwalt class has stopped, and the U.S. Congress is not even willing to equip the jumwalt class with enough shells. At present, the jumwalt class will be abandoned.

[@bingbinghan6186]

朱姆沃尔特就算了，世宗大王和阿利伯克级能比055好？还有，那些速度不是最大速度，二是最大巡航速度，不是一个概念

[@xinwu5323]

i am from wuhan,China.i think the best destory is Usa ship TYPE 055just is a fishingship

[@blairshi2045]

ype 055 is a fishing boat😀

[@frankzhao4546]

yes

[@martinroberts4391]

6 type 45 destroyers and 180 crew

[@matrempit2885]

Batleship Malaysia 🇲🇾🇲🇾KD Maharaja Lele laughing seeing this video..! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Too old and slow will you..? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@madontherun]

Type 45 at 9 hahaha ! Number 1 . It can monitor 2000 targets the size of a ball travelling Mach 3

[@ENGBriseB]

Plus it has the only Ballistic missiles defense and destroy system in Europe. And UKs Dragonfire Laser weapon system.

[@MPcat-4791]

Isn't the Type 055 technically a Cruiser?

[@YaMomsOyster]

Mate if you don’t include the missile load, and each type of missile and torpedoes I think you are just Fanboying !

[@ceb2024]

There is no doubt that the video maker of this person is not a military enthusiast at all.

[@JingPan-lo2zu]

055 is only a fishing boat，we just use it to fish

[@aburetik4866]

Zumwalt is only an expensive piece of garbage. Almost nothing works, be its engine, gun or radar etc. The next gen destroyer design DDG(X) will have to copy the Chinese type-055

[@엄보스스스]

저 순위에 있는 구축함을 누가 조종하느냐에따라 순위가 또 달라질수있다~~

[@MegaLouLuo]

Seeing > arleigh burke ? Dream on boys.

[@canda8350]

055 class is not Aegis combat system. It's Hardware and software not verified. On the other hand. Aegis system has been developed for over 20 years

[@russelfang7434]

Yes, the more advanced aegis system is certainly not the same as the original one.

[@shawnhe6180]

是的，不被你美国爸爸的系统认证是不能进这个排名的

[@veidorje1681]

they are all called FREGATES nowdays thanks 4 sharing : )

[@aestradarespeto]

Curious, there are destroyers in this list that weights no more than 500 tons over spanish F-100 class and are clearly less powerfull, mainly due to the lack of a system like AEGIS, but spanish ones are named frigates when serving in Spain Nay and destroyers when in australian Navy.

[@ThatsMrPencilneck2U]

Frigate is a weird word that means different kinds of ships depending on what era and what navy. In the US Navy, it didn't describe a ship smaller than a destroy until the 1970's. What Spain and Australia call a "frigate" could be entirely different, even if the Australians speak something that resembles English. Otherwise, "frigate" used to mean a ship of the line, which was anything short of a dreadnought.

[@juanalvarez5550]

No solamente ocurre con las fragatas, sino con cosas más sencillas como la paella: ¡vas a Australia y le llaman "paella" cualquier cosa, aunque no lleve arroz! PS: saludos a los australianos, buena gente.

[@dayanwarna5270]

@@ThatsMrPencilneck2U Yes the terminology has changed. In the 1980s Frigate was used to describe a ship under 3k and destroyer more than 3 (roughly speaking) Now the next generation RN frigates displace more than a WW2 arathusa class light cruiser! I do think Frigate by the british and Australian Navy means a primary ASW role with secondary AA and AS roles, and destroyer is a AA primary role with a support function of ASW/ASM. The T 45 and the Hobart class destroyers have a heavy AA role with the T45 going for a significant weapons boost shortly. The T26 for Australia and the UK will have a massive AA role but will be primarly tasked with ASW for fleet support.

[@JMK1552]

줌월트는 인정..나머지는 다 거기서 거기..

[@BITCO1N]

줌왈트 그 비싸기만 더럽게 비싼 쓰레기를??

[@jianhaozhu5261]

I was confused about the wried accent. Since I saw Korean No 2 😅😅😅R U KIDDING ME??? Then I realized that this video is made by a Korean guy 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 No doubt

[@seoul_9584]

Well at least Korean ships has better quality and performance than Chinese ships. China's tech is not that good tho. Its "Made in China"

[@roadking1062]

old school squid, anything over 10k is a damn cruiser

[@muksindika8806]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/n369l5J4jqieb7c

[@michaeldobson107]

What is your source?