Top 10 Deadliest Conventional Submarines in 2025 | Ultimate Ranking

[@EurasiaNaval]

Top X ranking videos always feel like a bit of a cop out. There will be more substantive content next week!

[@bestestusername]

I have noticed that if you do a top ten and say its in no particular order it does not offend so many people lol

[@JD-dm1uj]

I love these rankings and that they’re in ranked order!

[@AOErocks3832]

These are still exceptionally well-researched and taught me a lot. Cheers!

[@geyasu20]

Could you make another one for nuclear powered subs pls

[@grampajim1595]

Finally !! Someone finally recognizes the Taigei as the worlds best sub !!

[@angelus77300]

not the best.. The best CONVENTIONAL

[@marcusfranconium3392]

And yet forgetting the swedisch and dutch subs . that have been war time proven over the past decades , and wildly acknowledged as the best conventional submarines in the world.

[@cjackmond]

True, the Dutch Walrus class is considered by some submariners the best conventional sub in the world.

[@Prometheus4096]

@@cjackmond Not true. No one considers them excellent. They were good. 15 years ago. They are too big and obsolete today. That's why no other country wanted to buy them. Just a strange design that no navy needs.

[@johnbodman4504]

I tend to like the modern Russian boats, in both diesel and nuclear. The Russian weapons of all types are practical and durable.

[@djtan3313]

A very highly advanced one u missed out is d US’ f 35 class…

[@Joshua-dt5vi]

Or the Russian Moskva class.

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

That makes no sense.

[@Triggatra4258]

@@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle it's called a joke 🤣😭 WOW

[@HTV-2_Hypersonic_Glide_Vehicle]

@@Triggatra4258 that was a joke? Oh. I thought jokes were supposed to be funny and witty.

[@justsomedude6666]

Probably in the west and allied countries, American weapons get so much exposure that it becomes firing to hear about. I like to learn more about other countries weapons, especially weapons of our ‘enemies’ since they are far more interesting and get less coverage in the west.

[@briansparks4926]

This list should include the Dutch Walrus class even though it is an older design.

[@valerianocuomo996]

They didn't even include, about to be delivered to the Italian Navy, the U212 NHS, 100% Fincantieri and Leonardo TECHNOLOGY, the best that is currently in Europe, then the Chinese in my opinion will be rubbish😅

[@hermosoloremalaga]

You forgot Spain S 80 submarine. The first one is already built and it Will enter in service in November of this year.

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

Does it compare to others? Smh

[@pedroroselperez5518]

@@alexnderrrthewoke4479 It is said it is the best conventional submarine at this moment. So yes, it should be in this list.

[@geopoliticsjunkie4114]

The underhyped but always potent conventional. Great rundown in 15 minutes. .

[@seabass9916]

Little surprised to not see the South Korean Dosan Ahn Changho. Any idea where that would fit?

[@thomas_jay]

It's based on the german Type 214 (212). Probably somewhere along those lines.

[@cosmoray9750]

Look up " Why U.S. Officials Claim 'No Evidence' of Weapons Smuggling in Ukraine " on yT. informative and insightful......

[@tjlee9308]

​@@thomas_jayThey do have 9 214 class already. Dosan AC class are twice bigger then 214s

[@ChaosphereIX]

It is not really based on the 214 at all. It is a top tier SSK and big.

[@cjackmond]

The Dosan Ahn Chango class displaces twice as much, is much longer and has six vertical launch tubes for Hyunmoo 4-4 ballistic missiles. These are very modern 500 km range ballistic missiles.

[@jwt4377]

I like your ranking very much, I hope to see the rankings of frigates, nuclear-powered submarines, military drones, fighter jets, military helicopters, etc. in the future

[@brunol-p_g8800]

7:28 the Scorpene wasn’t jointly developed by France and Spain, it was developed by France. The first hulls were jointly built by France and Spain.

[@JuanGomez-wp8gm]

Fue desarrollado y contruido por el consorcio DCN y BAZAN, es cierto que DCN tenia algo mas de % de participacion, pero eso no excluye a la actual Navantia de su diseño.

[@Erik_larsson10]

Hm hmmm the Gotland Class?

[@SoldierIberian1]

Anda the spanish s80.submarine?? With 3 weeks with her hidrogen sistem??

[@johnsmith1953x]

*Wow, Japan has 2 of the 3 tops spots!*

[@TINMANSAN_]

ありがと!

[@djtan3313]

Great stuff

[@lydioconception3470]

Soryu class are on the list JMSDF made more submarines to counter China

[@sai01126]

Why would you still include those loud KILO submarines w/c was easily detected and tracked UK BTG escort on SCS back in 2021?

[@jayjackson8577]

I'm sure none of these conventional submarines would be any threat at all to the royal navy

[@thesquareofstalingrad8926]

Sweden didn't get a spot? 🙃

[@EurasiaNaval]

Good question. Probably should have included the Gotland class in there somewhere!

[@johnsmith1953x]

It sooo secret and invisible that nobody knows about it.

[@chrisdoulou8149]

Or the super Gotland class… the Australian Collins class. Basically a much bigger Gotland with all the kit from a Virginia class stuffed inside.

[@johnsmith1953x]

@@chrisdoulou8149 Not really.

[@chrisdoulou8149]

@@johnsmith1953x Explain? The Collins is based on the Gotland class, enlarged, with the combat management system of the Virginia stuffed into it.

[@미묘-m5h]

Wasn't Taigei a test bed? like the China navy Qing class

[@ChaosphereIX]

First one, yes. Rest of class, no.

[@ronbefree6771]

How about the effectiveness of their sonar??

[@mohamedayman5666]

You forgot the most modern one the F35

[@chrisdoulou8149]

In what universe does the Australian Collins class not appear in the top 10, let alone the top 3? It’s the largest diesel electric submarine in service and has the combat management system of the Virginia class. It actually bridges the capabilities of an SSK & an SSN, being used in many of the same roles as the USN Virginias.

[@TONSBERG100]

Collins does not have an API, and it did have a lot of maintenance issues. But I really think to build a new Collins series, learning form the mistakes of Collins 1 would be a better purchase than the nuclear subs of the Aukas agreement.

[@chrisdoulou8149]

@@TONSBERG100 Collins didn’t have API because the RAN did a study on it and the outcome was that for a submarine as large as the Collins, that it wasn’t worth the expense, and nor was the capability gained worth the capabilities sacrificed. Yes it did have a few issues initially due to the complexity of the design (its basically an enlarged Hokums with the combat systems of a Virginia stuffed into it), but these were all sorted by the early 2000’s and since then it has exceeded its reliability/performance expectations.

[@TONSBERG100]

@@chrisdoulou8149 Not sure that I agree with the assessment of the API. But maybe building new improved versions of the Collins might be more practical than Nuclear powered submarines. I thought I heard a cost of 239 billion us dollars, for 5 nuclear powered submarines. I am a former member of the USN. So, I do believe in Navel power. But I don't know if it is realistic for the RAN.

[@chrisdoulou8149]

@@TONSBERG100 Look, I’m sure the guys at the RAN have access to better data than either of us so I’m not going to argue their findings. As for the cost of the SSN project, the price you’re giving is for the entire project. Stage 1 is we upgrade fleet base west in Perth for the basing of 4 USN Virginias & 1 RN Astute. Stage 2 is the purchase of 3-5 interim SSN’s, likely block 1 Virginia’s till stage 3 is concluded, that being the design and manufacture of the SSN AUKUS, which we will be buying 8 of. That will be the British replacement for the Astute, basically an enlarged, advanced derivative of the Astute with a VLS and the combat management/armament of the Virginia replacement. So really it’s for 11-13 SSN, investment in both US & RN submarine production, the setup of a factory to manufacture 8 boats in Australia, all the training, maintenance, base upgrades and other costs. Also Australia doesn’t purchase by the item but rather by the cost of the life of the project, much like our F-35 buy, we didn’t just buy 100 jets, we bought 100 jets, spares, weapons, maintenance contracts, and training for all involved in one lump sum. We do this because we want to a) negotiate a single whole of life price, allowing us to get the project heavily discounted, with no gremlins appearing 10 years down the track, and b) we know a project is funded and paid for so it doesn’t suck the funds out of our defence budget 20 years from now.

[@TONSBERG100]

@@chrisdoulou8149 OK then it does not sound too expensive over long term. 11 to 13 SSN. Wow, no wonder the Chinese are upset. This will make Australia a naval power.

[@TimBrianTufuga]

Youve forgotten the Baracuda Class French Navy

[@ChaosphereIX]

That is a nuke. Conventional version does not exist yet.

[@TimBrianTufuga]

Barracuda is a SSK, conventional Submarine.@@ChaosphereIX

[@ChaosphereIX]

@@TimBrianTufuga Barracuda (Suffren) is a nuclear attack submarine to replace the Rubis class. The Shortfin Barracuda, or proposed Attack Class for the Australians (failed bid) is a conventional version that does not exist as nobody has bought it yet (although the Dutch might be the first customers). If it does not exist yet, like the Swedish A26 or the German 212CD, it should not be on the list.

[@TimBrianTufuga]

The Barracuda is a conventional SSK. You need to specify Suffren Dipshit!!!@@ChaosphereIX

[@heyfitzpablum]

Turkish 'Reis' class are just German Type 212 submarines, not an indigenous design.

[@valerianocuomo996]

Is all tecnology germanic and italian with FINCANTIERI and tyssen krupp, italy has 4,most 2 in the 2025 + 2 in the 2030...build all from FINCANTIERI..FIRST IN THE EUROPE FOR WARSHIP S ,CRUISE, SUBMARINE S...,CHINA HAS NOT CAPABILITY STIIL FOR AIRCRAF, AIRCRAF CARRIER, SHIP, THEY ARE ONLY 30 YEARS ,FROM COUNTRY 3RT WORLD TO NOW....COUNTRY IN EUROPE THEY ARE FROM WWI WHO BUILD S SUBMARINES, SHIP...ALSO TURKEY, FROM AFTER WWI TO 20YEAR S AGO....

[@valerianocuomo996]

Also FINCANTIERI, next ,only FINCANTIERI italy...DOMINIUM roman Empire

[@bagongkelabu]

​@@valerianocuomo996 ???

[@bagongkelabu]

It's a German Type 212/214 clone. But the Turks learn fast. I kinda like the STM500 mini (or small) submarine they're building. At just 540 tons, in littoral/ coastal depths these will probably prove to be ideal complement of any 1000+ ton DE submarine.

[@heyfitzpablum]

@@bagongkelabu If you mean by 'clone' the Turks bought the design from the Germans, added a few tweaks and built it-then yeah. But the differences are small and insignificant, this is a Thyssen design for all intents and purposes.

[@dexlab7539]

How is the REIS class fueled given that it is a fuel cell powered? Hydrogen??

[@rollerrollerichson6258]

Its a Type 214 from Germany.

[@zenki4666]

Li-ion battery seems highly risky?

[@jamesdu2044]

Warfare is inherently risky, and the Japanese have judged that the increased risk from Li battery fires is offset by the reduced risk of being exposed less often/for shorter durations

[@zenki4666]

@@jamesdu2044 I didn't mean if got hit.. But simply failing.. Like a tesla battery would.. Just on its own

[@HappyGM-R]

@@zenki4666 Well there have not been a single battery failure since introduction in 2018 so seems like it’s doing its job. Plus unlike Tesla it most likely has tons of failsafe since it’s not about making profit by keeping cost low. Oh and Elon Musk sucks

[@jamesleaty7308]

The heat is easily cooled with seawater. actually really good that way.

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

What about Swedes?

[@editz_slick]

In Sweden there is nothing Swedish airplanes, tanks and submarines all are usa made and gifted. Sweden gives free noble prizes to usa and usa gives all defence equipments. Other countries can learn this. Similar is tie-up between Russia and China.

[@kakavdedatakavunuk8516]

@@editz_slick Not so sure, you are greatly underestimating Swedish ingenuity, remember John Ericsson, Berge, Bratt etc.

[@editz_slick]

@@kakavdedatakavunuk8516 - No one in the world under estimates Swedish banking systems. But remember FTCA though it was mistake in third world but it was applicable globally to each and every bank after all it was settlement worth billions of dollars.

[@Xiaojian686]

Only small information, how can chinese 039c is ranked no.2?

[@Fred-vy1hm]

The South Korean KSS lll should be on this list most of which is just derivatives of 3 or 4 classes and where are the Scandinavian boats which are some of the quietest and most capable classes out there?

[@carloseam1]

And... what about de A26 and de U212 CD?...

[@murderofcrows2179]

You have three versions of the type 414, but ignore south korea's dosan ahn class with vls, AIP, and for block II, lithium batteries? kind of wierd definition of deadly, when half your subs aree three decades old design from germany.

[@ChaosphereIX]

Agreed. As a Canadian, I hope SK will build and sell us some to replace our Victoria class.

[@mello8701]

You missed the uk?

[@terrancechilds3049]

Wow this is a list that the United states navy wouldn't be on 😮

[@jamesleaty7308]

conventional only

[@rogueshadow4960]

Astute class?

[@TheVeteranPerspective]

As someone with practical experience, I would disagree with the rankings. I would also look at the training and technology that each country employs.

[@editz_slick]

Technology and less classified info is discussed, more submarine captains can add.

[@TheVeteranPerspective]

@@editz_slick You need to start by splitting a Diesel from the Nuclear. They are very different in their missions.

[@Scar_tisseu-86]

A fine video made, with an honost neatral sight. But i wonder if the best and most effective submarines are the ones you never hear about, like the dutch walrus class, altough there are 4 ofthem, the walrus the oldest of them is decommissioned in nov 2023, and the contract to build the next generation of dutch submarines will be given later this month march 2024. The walrus class, is always been very effective, and rarely spoken about. Wich is a reason in their multiple capabilities as intelligence gathering, and anti submarime wafmrfare and anti surface vessel capabilities belongs into this list.

[@ChaosphereIX]

Walrus is very good and deserves to be on the list, instead of 2 Type 214s and 3 Yuans, for example. Some organization could have seen them, and the Gotland or the Ula perhaps.

[@huiqinjinxi4514]

I don’t know anything about submarines at all, but I be heard about the seawolf class? Don’t see it on the list. 😊

[@EurasiaNaval]

It's a nuclear sub, so not on my list

[@magnatarbeing8749]

​@@EurasiaNavalI understand that these conventionally powered ( non nuclear) subs are actually quieter than the west's big nuke boats.

[@Dulqusley]

REIS CLASS#1

[@RaymondPexton]

Forgot gotland class and a26 from sweeden

[@ElderSwamp]

The Todaro class 🇮🇹 should had a spot... 😢😅

[@ChaosphereIX]

It did. It is a 212a.

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro 300 submarinos dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil

[@jagodiving]

base on experience and expertise producing conventionak submarine germany should be in front line years they have produced top ranks submerine like U 206, U 209 and lastly U212

[@Olistream]

s80 ? lol

[@enriquebicho7509]

yeah ... the real number 1

[@001Jonno]

Given that Israel's Dolphin II may be the only nuclear-armed conventional sub class in the world, one would have thought it would be on the list of the top 10 deadliest, probably at the top. The first boat of the Lada class has already been decomissioned as a flop while the second is on builders trials. With Shoigu saying in March that measures to ensure the timely delivery of the ship will be considered, and the timing of its state tests and commissioning into the Russian Navy will be clarified, it doesn't sound imminent to me, and I wonder if the Lada class should be on any 2023 list.

[@Chounubis]

Go back to licking the feet of your Jew overlords, goyim.

[@李白-m1m]

以色列非法拥核，最多自保

[@ChaosphereIX]

Lada is supposed to be good now that the tech has matured, and you are right Dolphin II should be on the list perhaps, very deadly subs.

[@donquixote1502]

How cannot Sweden be represented? This list is a joke of course.

[@Chounubis]

R2pe capital of Europe; migrant filled hellscapr masquerading as a country; won't be in existence for long, and probably not worth listing...

[@Dan-vb5fh]

Yes its a joke.

[@Dan-vb5fh]

The Gotland class non-nuclear submarine are among the most advanced in the world.

[@orgkampong]

Maybe cuz like Volvo & many of Sweden's asset eventually will end up in Chinese control.

[@alexnderrrthewoke4479]

Swedde subs sucks man. Smh. Sweeden army a joke too. Please stop this nonsense comment

[@dv2045]

S80 Plus submarine is not in the list!!

[@josej.pozuelo1835]

S-80 Plus!! No tenéis ni idea.

[@Mr.KB_]

i think Philippine government should consider taigei, that would be a game-changer to Phil. to deter China instead of scorpene or s80 isaac of spain

[@shawn97006]

You realize the Lada class doesn't actually work right/? Literally does not work.

[@ChaosphereIX]

Yes, it does. Kinks have been worked out bunch more being built

[@shawn97006]

@@ChaosphereIX Only 6 Maybe will be built and one is already being scrapped. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nqLWp6iKorytd80

[@JoseManuelFerreira-jk3ig]

Eu gostava que Portugal , tivesse 4 submarinos da classe Taigei ou da classe a seguir que pudesse disparar também mísseis cruzeiro, ou os alemães type 212 CD ou a classe type 216, mas já equipados com baterias de lítio ou qualquer outra bateria avançada, mas que pudesse também lançar mísseis cruzeiro, seria bom podermos ter mais 4 submarinos

[@pichupuche2474]

Doesn't make sense Type 214 is so much expensive and better submarine than 039A why they rank so low?

[@ENGBriseB]

These are not not Nuclear powered. But the ones that you have picked no one really knows how good they really are especially some of the countries you've mentioned.

[@JoselitoAbrantes]

Why no us submarine in the list.

[@seoldongjun]

The sector you judged is a little questionable ㆍChina's technology is lacking a lot, but I think there is a problem with its ranking ㆍ

[@editz_slick]

China has mightest defence forces in the world if usa fights china it will lose war maximum within one month. Chaina has might and it's better equipped with weapons courtesy it's close friendship with Russia. China is 25-30years ahead of usa.

[@LyuChen94]

dude here's a news. maybe the so call 096 basically is a 094plus or Chinese version Delta4. anyway that tortoise shell probably won't disappear╭( ๐_๐)╮

[@danielnitescu3054]

the ranking....1 212 cd last german 2. A26 3. taigei class...... Scorpene is verry noisy like nuclear sub!!! same level with Lada class type 39 b is more noisy like improved kilo 2

[@simonschneider5913]

At least when it comes to objectivity, you are way ahead of HI Sutton. Just saying.

[@MrCastodian]

Sorry to say but this list failed when Gotland were off the list.

[@redrust3]

Nice list. Because of the secretive world of sub design, it’s hard to find transparency. Although older, some of the better designs include the older German 206, 209, and 212 models. Many buyers and critics. As for the Chinese and other subs, we can’t really judge them because they’ve never been studied except by the Chinese themselves. How would they perform in international waters. Probably the most telling will be the next conflict between India and Pakistan. Both have subs, and a long history of war.

[@kevinzd13]

为什么中国不再购买俄罗斯潜艇？因为中国已经拥有更好的中国潜艇！

[@redrust3]

@@kevinzd13 maybe because Chinese refuse to pay license fees, and don’t honor patents. Long history of that. That’s why Chinese jets can’t reach Mach 2 without Russian engine.

[@XkMeng]

@@redrust3 Can you tell me which military weapon design has been patented anywhere? Even one? In addition, the j20 with dual ws-15 engines even achieved a maximum speed of 2.8 Mach

[@editz_slick]

Good one.

[@redrust3]

@@XkMeng This is the latest information on Chengdu J20. Speed is still claimed to be Mach 2, although sources claim that it’s actually Mach 1.8 because of inferior metallurgy. (Engine melts at higher speeds.) No one believes China’s claims. It would help China’s reputation if J 20,was exported to an ally like Pakistan. JF 17 is antiquated, and would be wiped out by India during war. Unfortunately, Pakistan is bankrupt, like China and most of its allies. (Most default on Belt and Road loans.) As far as I know, there are zero export customers for J20. Indian Air Force claim that J20 can be detected by conventional radar, so they are not concerned about it. Perhaps donate it to Pakistan to developing its reputation. Don’t wait until it’s too late. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-20

[@licusattimarcelo6898]

KSS3

[@GTChris]

I wouldn't be surprised if ww3 ever starts that we'll see submarines fall victim to tiny cheap armed underwater drones. Before you say that could never happen, well that's what they said about tanks, then about giant battle ships and here we are. Quantum magnetometer technology could expose subs 6 kilometers away. If that technology gets fleshed out, an armed underwater drone hitting a strategic weakpoint is just about as far fetched as we thought hitting a battle ship with a modified speedboat was.

[@republicspaceagency9141]

There are no US Submarine here but why if i may asky?

[@EurasiaNaval]

US dont have conventional attack subs in service

[@republicspaceagency9141]

@@EurasiaNaval what about Ohio and Colombia Submarines?

[@usermk99]

@@republicspaceagency9141 These are nuclear powered subs Not SSKs / conventional

[@MY-zj8pb]

@@republicspaceagency9141 you are an idiot

[@DucaTech]

If there's a job description that entails: attention to details, I think you should avoid applying.

[@dianapennepacker6854]

Jesus people don't read. Guys convention means NOT NUCLEAR. You mention the Gotland but it isn't on here. For a sub that sunk a US carrier in a war game, and did so again the next year. I'm suprised it isn't on the list. How come? Also how do we know how good Chinese subs actually are?

[@EurasiaNaval]

I forgot the Gotland, that is the only reason. Performance info on submarines are pretty sketchy in general, so it's quite subjective based on stories, articles, opinions, etc By the way, while the Gotland could have theoretically sunk the US carrier. If it did so in real life, it would be highly dangerous, perhaps somewhat suicidal, for the Gotland's crew itself, meaning in reality they may not take the shot. So, there's a bit of caveat. Not taking away anything from the boat, of course, it's no doubt a great sub

[@edwardlaw797]

Again age of the ship newest tech.

[@701e9]

Taigei is F-22 underwater

[@sambass5360]

Lol this list ain’t even close

[@enriquebicho7509]

S 80 + ... ever heard of? . lol

[@ΔωδεκάνησοςΡοδοςΣύμηΚώς]

Βάλτε μας Ελληνικούς υπότιτλους ρε παιδιά 😢 Για να μπορούμε να καταλαβαίνουμε αυτά που λέτε,......!

[@percivalpina3050]

JAPAN NAMBAWAN \m/

[@dinadina2186]

Kapal selam china masih di bawa scorpene

[@sergiodesouzajunior3962]

Compro 500.000 submarinos dessa classe para a marinha do Brasil rio de janeiro

[@MDruheITaIukdar]

💮❇️..Bangladesh..🇧🇩🤝🏻🇨🇳....China....🎇💠

[@lydioconception3470]

Yes Soryu class sunmarines. Had made it plus the Taegie Thank you JMsdf....Banzai......

[@BoAndersson-kr5oq]

Why not the Swedish submariene?????? You are amateurs

[@dennislao7406]

Defend scs from foreign invaders

[@guysutton857]

Where is the uk's vanguard

[@bluesky5542]

Germany builds the best. They are not nuclear but you can't find them under water.

[@chewycaca]

No US subs??

[@EurasiaNaval]

US only has nuclear attack subs, no conventional ones

[@boyriyan2217]

Pesenan indonesia dr frances dr 3 parian indonesia memilih no 2 senjata d kpl selam pesanan rudal torpedo dan rudal permukan pesen k frances 3 unit termsk tot 1 d bikin d indonesia d pt pal

[@allblack2019]

Wrong rankings 😂

[@Acanofbeer]

What a pile of poo this upload is.

[@Aendavenau]

Everything Ruzzia touches turns out to be shit so I doubt the Improved Kilo class or Lada is up to snuff

[@ChaosphereIX]

Oh they are good.

[@seungwooham3204]

중국 애들 중뽕은 심각하노 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 중국 제는 100위권이다 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ

[@Specter2016]

No American submarines?

[@definitelyfrank9341]

They don't have conventionally-powered submarines.

[@editz_slick]

KZbin is American it blabbers only about usa this and that while real time information about worldwide great defence products and weapons are classified and if known it's undermined by usa and KZbin.

[@ojlbrickwork8092]

USA and UK have the quietest subs this rank time is crap

[@EurasiaNaval]

'Conventional submarines'... I wish people actually read

[@GoCards512]

where is USA? lol

[@xmadxtiox]

No US, huh? The US doesn't only have nuclear powered subs. Thumbs down!!!

[@tzenzhongguo]

What disappointment Eurasia Naval Insight you gave the Japanese sub at #1. You………Hanjian! 😂😂😂 just kidding

[@EvaExplores-x2x]

Japan will always have just a slight edge in diesel sub but china also have nuclear. Also when china invades taiwan, china can create such a traffic jam of the entire shallow strait entrance with anti-sub assets that will render any foreign submarines useless to try to intervene.

[@tzenzhongguo]

@@EvaExplores-x2x it’s not invade it’s liberate and unification.

[@HappyGM-R]

@@tzenzhongguo But your still invading…

[@tzenzhongguo]

@@HappyGM-R True……Banzai Chugoku! Wansui ZhongGuo! Lol China can into “DaiNipponTeiKoku”. Hold my baijiu, and Xi told me there will be a Space Battleship Liaoling.

[@HappyGM-R]

@@tzenzhongguo The fuck did I just read. You Ok? Need some treatment? Eh? I know a good mental doctor down the street… comment here again when your in London

[@两岸一家亲-n1h]

你是中国人吗？

[@abyyy490]

Where's american subs?

[@Erfsasdfsdff]

US only has nuclear powered subs

[@filipzietek5146]

Read the title again

[@heyfitzpablum]

America has no conventionally powered subs, they're an all nuclear fleet.

[@catonpillow]

Unfortunately, they hit a mysterius reef yet again and couldn't make it on the list.

[@j.7437]

this video is about conventional subs which America no longer produces, all subs Americans have in service today are nuclear powered.